Sin: More Deadly Than the Coronavirus, part twenty-two

As has been noted throughout in the text of this continuing series that began three years ago this month, bioengineered SARS CoV-2 virus that escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology before it became fully weaponized was the rotten fruit of the gain-of-function funding that had been provided by the now thoroughly discredited Dr. Anthony Fauci, who headed the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases from 1984 to 2022, through his allies at the nefarious EcoHealth Alliance company despite Fauci’s repeated denials that this is so.

A recent report provided a summary of the cogent facts:

BRET BAIER: We have shown you this timeline before. The origins of COVID-19, what happened over the months. But with new information and new details, just within the past few days, we thought we would go through it again.

More than three years ago this mysterious virus began to spread in Wuhan, China. The World Health Organization said at the time initial COVID-19 cases seemed to be connected to a wet market in the city of Wuhan. But, behind closed doors, a new theory was discussed that the virus originated in a lab. Some officials pushed back publicly on that idea but over time, agencies and experts have increasingly begun to support the lab leak theory.

January 2020, the world first learns that patients in Wuhan, China are suffering serious complications from an unknown virus. And we soon realize infections from a novel coronavirus are fueling a fast-spreading global pandemic. By mid-month the first U.S. case of COVID is reported in Washington state. Health experts conclude the outbreak is due to human-to-human transmission.

FAUCI: It's really a big difference with the Chinese this time now they look like they are being quite transparent and cooperative with us.

In January of last year, Fox News obtained internal communications from the National Institutes of Health. Those emails from the earliest days of the crisis revealed NIH head Dr. Anthony Fauci was warned COVID may have leaked from a Chinese government-run lab, the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

January 27th, Fauci is told the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases has been indirectly funding the Wuhan lab through EcoHealth Alliance, a U.S.-based scientific nonprofit that had been working with novel coronaviruses.

January 31st, Dr. Kristian Andersen, a noted virologist at the Scripps Lab privately tells Fauci that after discussions with his colleagues, some of COVID-19's features, potentially look engineered and, quote: "The genome is inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory."

Fauci reacts immediately and organizes an all-hands-on-deck conference call with colleagues. He tells the deputy director of the agency, Dr. Hugh Auchincloss of the urgency: "Read this paper as well as the email that I will forward to you now. You will have tasks today that must be done."

Fauci also holds a conference call with a dozen virologists from around the world. Some immunologists were not convinced the virus occurred naturally. Dr. Robert Garry of Tulane University wrote, "I really can't think of a plausible natural scenario where you get from the bat virus or one very similar to it to nCoV where you insert exactly 4 amino acids 12 nucleotide that all have to be added at the exact same time to gain this function. That, and you don't change any other amino acid in S2? I just can't figure out how this gets accomplished in nature. Of course, in the lab it would be easy to generate the perfect 12 base insert that you wanted."

Notes of the meeting also revealed those suspicions of a Wuhan lab leak are suppressed over concerns that public revelations of Chinese government involvement would do, quote, great potential harm to science and international harmony.

Dr. Garry later says a consensus is reached for drafting a report, quote, "One, don't try to write a paper at all - it's unnecessary; or, two, if you do write it, don't mention a lab origin as that will just add fuel to the conspiracists."

Just four days later, five American, British and Australian researchers who are all on that Fauci conference call author preliminary findings that abandon their earlier private beliefs that COVID was likely the result of a laboratory leak. It's unclear what new evidence prompted such a drastic 180. But private communications show the various drafts of their report are sent to Fauci and Collins for editing and approval. The records do not reveal if they, in fact, edited the new version.

Weeks later a final version of that report is posted. Again, a total reversal of what those virologists wrote in private emails earlier.

March 17th, in Nature Medicine: Our analysis clearly shows that COVID is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus. But that was not enough to tamp down what multiple sources inside and outside government believed, that the Wuhan lab was, indeed, the COVID ground zero.

Multiple sources say this may be the costliest government cover-up of all time by China... There is a growing belief that the COVID-19 virus originated in the Wuhan lab, not as a bioweapon but as China's effort to find and deal with viruses to show the world China was as good as or better than the U.S. on that front.

Later that day president trump is asked about our reporting. "More and more we are hearing the story. We are doing a very thorough examination of this horrible situation that happened."

The next day April 16th a frustrated Collins emails Fauci, "Wondering if there is something NIH can do to help put down this very destructive conspiracy." Collins' email includes a link to our "Special Report" and FoxNews.com reporting. A day later Fauci replies, quote: "I would not do anything about this right now. It is a shiny object that will go away in times."

A month later we learn doctors Drs. Kristian Andersen and Robert Garry are awarded a nearly $90 million research grant from Fauci's agency. A month after that Dr. Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance the group that did the original U.S.-funded experiments with the Chinese at the Wuhan Institute of Virology received a $7.5 million grant over five years from Dr. Fauci. President Biden a year later tasks the U.S. Intelligence community to probe the COVID origins, but its August report was inconclusive due it in large part to China's unwillingness to assist with the investigation.

BAIER: You clarify that you thought it was not a weaponized thing from the Chinese but that it may have been a lab accident. It seems more and more pointing that way. Are you confident saying that or closer to that?

DR. FRANCIS COLLINS: You know, I don't think I have any more new information to be able to tip the balance. Certainly possible that this was somehow understudy in the lab even though it was not human-engineered from scratch. I'm quite confident of that.

BAIER: Eight intelligence agencies participated in a review of the coronavirus origins. Four of those, along with the National Intelligence Council, judged with low confidence that the virus likely originated from natural exposure.

FAUCI (JULY 22, 2022): We think it's more likely that it was a natural evolution.

BAIER: You still believe that? There are more and more organizations that point right to a lab leak.

FAUCI: No, no. That's not so, Bret.

BAIER: More people saying it. We are hearing it around the world.

FAUCI: More people saying it doesn't mean there's more evidence of it... If you take a group of emails where people are considering and thinking out loud and you stop there, and don't look at the weeks of careful examination by those same people that wrote the emails and then say you know now that we have looked at it, in the published peer review literature, they explain very clearly why they think it's a natural occurrence.

BAIER: The Energy Department determined with low confidence the virus likely spread from a mishap at the Wuhan lab. However, some Biden officials and Dr. Fauci have not changed their view on the origins.

JOHN KIRBY (FEBRUARY 27, 2023): Their work is still ongoing. There hasn't been a final conclusion arrived at here.

FAUCI: We may not ever know. That's unfortunate but that's the possibility that we might not ever know.

The Energy Department joins the FBI in supporting the lab leak theory. FBI Director Christopher Wray spoke for the first time about that assessment on "Special Report."

CHRISTOPHER WRAY: The FBI has for quite some time now assessed that the origins of the pandemic are most likely a potential lab incident in Wuhan. Let me step back for a second. You know, the FBI has folks, agents, professionals, analysts, virologists, microbiologists, etc. who focus on the dangers of biological threats which include things like novel viruses like COVID. And the concerns that in the wrong hands some bad guys, a hostile nation-state, a terrorist, a criminal, the threats that those could pose. So here you are talking about a potential leak from a Chinese government-controlled lab that killed millions of Americans. And that's precisely what that capability was designed for. I should add, that our work related to this continues and there is not a whole lot of details that I can share that aren't classified. I will just make the observation that the Chinese government seems, to me, has been doing its best to try to thwart and obfuscate the work here.

BAIER: Director Wray's comments were as definitive as any official has said publicly about the origins of COVID. Two agencies though remain undecided in determining those origins. China meantime continues to deny the lab leak theory saying this week, rehashing that will only hurt the reputation of the United States. Republican lawmakers on Capitol Hill are also investigating the origins of COVID and have launched a select committee over that matter and the U.S. taxpayer dollars that were funneled into the Wuhan lab. (The Lab Leak Theory Timeline And How Fauci Gave Grant Money To EcoHealth To Study Coronavirus In Wuhan.)

Trying to nail weasels such as Fauci, whose efforts to discredit the virus’s lab leak origins have by privately encouraging a “paper” to be published that he later cited as “proof” of his false contention, is something akin to trying to nail Jell-O gelatin brand desert to the wall.

However, efforts aplenty are being made by various naturalists within the organized crime family of the false opposite of the naturalist “right” (as well as by a few commentators in the realm of the mainslime media) to bring the truth of the Wuhan/Red Chinese/SARS CoV-2/Covid-19/Coronavirus to light, not that the truth will change too many minds, which, quite predictably, are divided along partisan political grounds, which is why so many ordinary people continue to wear those stupid masks, which do not one blessed thing to prevent anyone from getting the dreaded virus that is only deadly in most instances in those who do not have any underlying medical conditions (co-morbidities).

Here is a series of reports concerning the information about the virus’s origins that have been published since part twenty-one of this series was posted on March 1, 2023. I will offer brief comments after each report:

On Tuesday, FBI director Christopher Wray dropped a nuclear-level bombshell.

In an interview with Fox News, the nation’s top G-man finally admitted what much of the world already believes: That COVID-19 “most likely” originated from an incident in a Chinese government-controlled lab in Wuhan – with emphasis on incident, not accident.

Wray’s public confirmation of a viewpoint that his agency has apparently held for “quite some time,” came a day after the Wall Street Journal reported that the US Department of Energy (DOE) had reached a similar conclusion.

According to a classified report presented to the White House and members of Congress, DOE officials — many overseeing national laboratories that conduct biological research — now agree that the COVID pandemic “most likely” came from a lab leak. 

These revelations arrive after three years of claims by everyone from the US government to major spy agencies to Washington’s COVID policy dictator, Dr. Anthony Fauci, that “natural occurrence” was the only possible cause of the coronavirus pandemic.

It wasn’t the Wuhan virology lab that released the virus; the very lab where US-funded research was occurring, they insisted.

Rather, the virus originated in a slaughterhouse nearby. And anyone who dared to stray from the party line, including medical professionals, was labeled a wild conspiracy theorist, racist, or both. 

Watching as the COVID pandemic scandal unravels, I can’t help but flashback to my birthplace, the USSR, and the Chernobyl nuclear accident that took place 37 years ago in Soviet-era Ukraine.

Indeed, the COVID lab-leak sham now transpiring in my adopted homeland eerily reminds of the Soviet cover-up orchestrated in the aftermath of the worst nuclear disaster in world history.

There are stunning similarities between the tactics employed today by Washington – and Moscow decades ago – as the ruling classes clamor to prevent their citizenry from learning the truth. 

n the night of April 25-26, 1986, an explosion and fire destroyed the Chernobyl 4 reactor about 60 miles from Kyiv, sending a radioactive cloud into the air that spread across the Soviet Union and northern Europe.

Much like initial US efforts to minimize the severity of the COVID-19 outbreak in early 2020, the Soviets denied early reports that an accident had even taken place.

Indeed, an order to evacuate the area didn’t arrive until 36 hours after the accident.

It wasn’t until Sweden, Finland, and Denmark reported unusually high levels of radiation that the Kremlin finally acknowledged the situation.

Meanwhile, people were already dying from acute radiation syndrome (ARS), suffering from nosebleeds, nausea and vomiting as the government drafted “volunteers” from across the country to assist with the clean-up.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, who flip-flopped on every possible COVID-related issue – from the effectiveness of masks to the benefit of the vaccine — would have been proud of the masterful denial and deception campaign unleashed by Soviet apparatchiks on both domestic and international audiences.

Much like Fauci contended that masking was unnecessary in the pandemic’s first months, Soviet government-controlled media called Western reports about the accident unfounded, claiming that everything was under control.

The problem is getting better,” a Soviet Embassy official in the United States assured curious minds in the US government after the accident.

Meanwhile, Soviet news presenters insisted to their fellow countrymen that “the trouble has passed.”

As for Fauci, turns out those early mask messages were merely an attempt to conserve scarce protective gear in the face of likely shortages.

During the Chernobyl period, I was a Moscow university subject, like everyone else, to heavy anti-American indoctrination.

We dismissed those early news reports as Western disinformation.

A French teacher even told the class that she had received a letter from her mother, who lived in a village not far from the contaminated area, inviting her to visit that summer.

Years later, I found out that my own mother and aunt went to Chernobyl to visit my uncle, who had been drafted to help with the disaster.

My mother died seven years later at 55 from unknown causes, my uncle later died from thyroid cancer, and my aunt is struggling with cancer now. 

Thousands of Russians perished from illnesses such as cancer.

And yet, we were not allowed to ask any questions.

Even today, Chernobyl’s total death toll and long-term health effects remain unknown owing to a lack of accountability by the Soviet-era government.

More than 40 years later, I was shocked to see a similar coordinated effort to obscure the origins of the COVID epidemic. 

Orchestrated by Big Government –  in collusion with Big Tech and the Big Media – the goal was to distort and shut down any candid public discourse about this critical national security issue.

US spy agencies concealed from Congress, and therefore the American people, that COVID-19 demonstrated clear consistencies with China’s biological warfare doctrine and Beijing’s long-term programs to weaponize viruses.

This, despite the fact that the State Department knew as early as 2005 that China operates an offensive biological weapons program.

Aided by a left-leaning media – here playing the role of the Communist-era newspaper Pravda – the goal was to demonize anyone, including medical professionals, who strayed away from the party line.

The Soviet government’s motivation for the Chernobyl coverup, according to an archived KGB report, was “to prevent panic and provocative rumors.”

Perhaps the US authorities possessed similar motivations more than three decades later. Whatever the thinking, as someone who fled autocracy for democracy, I am hopeful the new covid disclosures will compel our government to stop resorting to Soviet-styled disinformation –  and begin providing Americans with the real information they need to protect their health, and even their survival. (Why the COVID lab leak cover-up is similar to Chernobyl.)

Anyone who thinks that the new disclosures, which are not exactly “news” to those who have been reading these commentaries for the past three years, will do anything to “compel our government to stop resorting to Soviet-styled” disinformation” does not realize that we are only witnessing the logical, inevitable deterioration of a world that has rejected the sweet yoke of Christ the King as He has revealed Himself to us exclusively through His true Church, the Catholic Church, in favor of the Pelagian myth of human self-redemption, a myth that leads ultimately to the triumph, albeit temporary, of rank, undisguised totalitarianism.

Moreover, our civil minders have worked overtime to deliberately label true information, especially concerning the harm caused by the poisoned jabs called vaccines, as “misinformation.” Having been caught doing this, though, some are arguing to use their censorious powers to label facts as “malinformation”:

At the behest of the Biden administration, censorship escalated dramatically in 2021. In an effort to boost vaccine uptake at all costs, Facebook told officials that it was censoring “often-true content” that did not contain misinformation but which might dissuade people from getting vaccinated. Many prohibited claims on social media pertaining to topics like natural immunity, breakthrough infections, and myocarditis proved to be true.

On Jan. 11, 2023, Dr. Anthony Fauci co-authored a paper in the journal Cell, arguing that viruses like SARS-CoV-2, which replicate in the respiratory mucosa, cannot be effectively controlled through vaccines that create systemic immunity, such as the current mRNA vaccines. Anyone making similar assertions on social media before 2023 may have been deplatformed, or their post might have been removed. Today it is worth asking how many people would have declined vaccines or boosters if this kind of commentary had been widely available.

One of the key problems with AB 2098, Hoeg explained, is that its vagueness “puts us all at risk of ‘misinformation’ not being defined using scientific data but by the beliefs of the dominant political party.” Throughout 2020, 2021, and 2022 “misinformation” and “settled science” were not determined through objective criteria—they were determined by the political preferences of those wielding power in state bureaucracies, tech companies, and mainstream media. In consequence, we are facing a snowballing economic crisis, children have been plunged into an academic and mental health catastrophe, and the country has seen non-COVID excess deaths of tens of thousands of people under 45. The bureau of experts has inflicted bottomless stress on the population as a whole and has shown a total disregard for basic civil rights and human dignity.

Free speech is rarely just about free speech for its own sake; it is about placing checks and balances on the ability of an authority to shape reality. “Nobody has a monopoly on the truth,” Younes explained. Ending the COVID truth regime is not only a matter of correcting the record on misguided policies. The underlying set of assumptions that led to mass censorship and rule-by-technocrat must be dismantled as well. (Collapse of the COVID Truth Regime.)

This a fine factual accounting of how our country has become an Orwellian playground for its high priests and priestesses of the Deep State, Big Pharma, Big Tech, Big Pharma, and the ubiquitous “academic” and “talking heads” who do their bidding for them.

Unfortunately for the author of the commentary cited just above, “free speech” is not about placing checks and balances on the ability of an authority to shape a reality” as, yes, the Catholic Church has a monopoly on all truth pertaining to the supernatural order and even in the natural order as she is the authoritative interpreter of the Natural Law.

While Holy Mother Church permits her children free inquiry in matters of speculative theology and on other matters which have not been defined or have arisen as a result of various scientific discoveries and/or technological advances hitherto unknown, she insists that such inquiry be based solely in a search for truth and conducted in a rigorous spirit of intellectual honesty without any special pleading (finding “proofs’ for a preconceived conclusion while speciously arguing that such pleading represents scholarship when it does not) and that all things pertaining to Faith and Morals be in submitted to her magisterial authority for review and comment when deemed necessary.

Similarly, Holy Mother Church, while recognizing the legitimate expertise of those involved in the study of worldly matters, including the physical sciences and that she has no direct role to play in such study, insists that nothing contrary to the known truth be advanced and that all endeavors be undertaken for the honor and glory of the Most Blessed Trinity and for the genuine good of souls, both spiritually and temporally.

However, no one is morally free to disseminate error in the belief that someone else can always counterbalance it, something that Pope Gregory XVI specifically noted in Mirari Vos, August 15, 1832:

"This shameful font of indifferentism gives rise to that absurd and erroneous proposition which claims that liberty of conscience must be maintained for everyone. It spreads ruin in sacred and civil affairs, though some repeat over and over again with the greatest impudence that some advantage accrues to religion from it. "But the death of the soul is worse than freedom of error," as Augustine was wont to say. When all restraints are removed by which men are kept on the narrow path of truth, their nature, which is already inclined to evil, propels them to ruin. Then truly "the bottomless pit" is open from which John saw smoke ascending which obscured the sun, and out of which locusts flew forth to devastate the earth. Thence comes transformation of minds, corruption of youths, contempt of sacred things and holy laws -- in other words, a pestilence more deadly to the state than any other. Experience shows, even from earliest times, that cities renowned for wealth, dominion, and glory perished as a result of this single evil, namely immoderate freedom of opinion, license of free speech, and desire for novelty.

Here We must include that harmful and never sufficiently denounced freedom to publish any writings whatever and disseminate them to the people, which some dare to demand and promote with so great a clamor. We are horrified to see what monstrous doctrines and prodigious errors are disseminated far and wide in countless books, pamphlets, and other writings which, though small in weight, are very great in malice. We are in tears at the abuse which proceeds from them over the face of the earth. Some are so carried away that they contentiously assert that the flock of errors arising from them is sufficiently compensated by the publication of some book which defends religion and truth. Every law condemns deliberately doing evil simply because there is some hope that good may result. Is there any sane man who would say poison ought to be distributed, sold publicly, stored, and even drunk because some antidote is available and those who use it may be snatched from death again and again? (Pope Gregory XVI, Mirari Vos, August 15, 1832.)

This does away with the very specious argument about the purpose of “free speech” advanced by the author of a factual review of the ways in which the deep state engineers and their accomplices in the semi-private sector have sought to suppress the truth.

Moreover, Pope Leo XIII, writing in Immortale Dei, explained that there one is never morally free to do that which is proscribed by the Divine and Natural Laws:

So, too, the liberty of thinking, and of publishing, whatsoever each one likes, without any hindrance, is not in itself an advantage over which society can wisely rejoice. On the contrary, it is the fountain-head and origin of many evils. Liberty is a power perfecting man, and hence should have truth and goodness for its object. But the character of goodness and truth cannot be changed at option. These remain ever one and the same, and are no less unchangeable than nature itself. If the mind assents to false opinions, and the will chooses and follows after what is wrong, neither can attain its native fullness, but both must fall from their native dignity into an abyss of corruption. Whatever, therefore, is opposed to virtue and truth may not rightly be brought temptingly before the eye of man, much less sanctioned by the favor and protection of the law. A well-spent life is the only passport to heaven, whither all are bound, and on this account the State is acting against the laws and dictates of nature whenever it permits the license of opinion and of action to lead minds astray from truth and souls away from the practice of virtue. To exclude the Church, founded by God Himself, from the business of life, from the making of laws, from the education of youth, from domestic society is a grave and fatal error. A State from which religion is banished can never be well regulated; and already perhaps more than is desirable is known of the nature and tendency of the so-called civil philosophy of life and morals. The Church of Christ is the true and sole teacher of virtue and guardian of morals. She it is who preserves in their purity the principles from which duties flow, and, by setting forth most urgent reasons for virtuous life, bids us not only to turn away from wicked deeds, but even to curb all movements of the mind that are opposed to reason, even though they be not carried out in action. (Pope Leo XIII, Immortale Dei, November 1, 1885.)

It is a grave and fatal error to exclude Holy Mother Church from the business of life, from the making of laws, from the education of youth and from influencing the whole direction of domestic society. The Western world is on a death march from which, humanly speaking, there is no retreat. This is all a preparation for the coming of Antichrist to take control of a world that has been torn apart by the proliferation of sin and error by those who believe that men can make their lives better without Christ the King and His true Church, which is precisely why the state-sponsored merchants of genuine disinformation have been so successful while being completely without remorse after their schemes have been exposed:

It has been a bad week for patronizing crusaders who seek to bar controversial speech on the grounds of “disinformation.” On February 26, the Wall Street Journal broke a story regarding a classified Department of Energy report that the Covid-19 virus most likely originated with a leak from China’s Wuhan lab. FBI Director Christopher Wray echoed the DOE’s conclusion in a February 28 interview with Fox News. Such developments should be a monumental embarrassment to numerous figures in both government and the establishment news media who worked diligently in 2020-2021 to block accounts that endorsed—or even favorably considered—the lab-leak thesis.

The new bombshell revelations will likely create turbulence in multiple respects. It will exacerbate already contentious relations between the United States and the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Xi Jinping’s government made every effort to prevent an independent investigation of Covid’s onset, and PRC officials were aided by Western medical bureaucrats who insisted that it was virtually certain the virus came from nature. The already tattered reputations of those bureaucrats have taken a new hit and may now be damaged beyond repair. That is especially true for Anthony Fauci, who was director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) during the Covid pandemic and was the principal spokesperson for U.S. government policies. 

Members of the establishment press worked very hard to bury the lab-leak thesis as wild, baseless speculation. Until May 2021, allegations that the virus may have originated in the Wuhan Institute of Virology were widely dismissed as an unfounded conspiracy theory. President Donald Trump’s receptivity to the theory led to knee-jerk conclusions about it being explicitly or implicitly racist as well. Only a handful of media outlets, principally Fox News, National Review, and The American Conservative, treated the lab-leak hypothesis seriously, and they were mocked, denounced, and vilified for doing so. Facebook and other social media information gatekeepers summarily barred posts embracing the argument that the deadly virus more probably came from the Wuhan virology lab than from bats being sold at a Wuhan market as “disinformation.”

However, it gradually became apparent that it was not “settled science” that the virus originated in nature. Admissions, albeit often grudging, emerged from multiple sources, including the Centers for Disease Control, that it was at least possible the virus could have begun in a laboratory. Another major blow to the blackout on debate came in late May 2021 when the Biden administration authorized a comprehensive investigation to discover the source of the coronavirus. That move was a complete reversal of the administration’s policy during its initial weeks in office when it shut down a similar Trump-authorized investigation by the intelligence community. 

The subsequent intelligence report asserted that the source of the virus could not be determined—that both the natural-origins and the lab-leak hypotheses were plausible. An issue involving such uncertainty obviously should have been a legitimate subject of public debate. However, the self-anointed guardians against disinformation smothered that debate. 

Wall Street Journal columnist Holman W. Jenkins Jr. asked a highly pertinent question: “On what basis was the lab leak theory ruled out for months by the media despite the lack of any evidence or logic for ruling it out?” His answer was an unsettling one. “We in the press dismissed the lab theory because of an appeal to authority: When anti-Donald Trump spokespeople ridiculed it, that was good enough for us.” 

Even if Jenkins is wrong about the blackout being due to pure partisanship, the exclusion of the lab-leak theory from the arena of public debate has been profoundly damaging. The collusion between government and media outlets to suppress maverick views amounted to comprehensive censorship by proxy. Reason’s Robby Soave was correct when he wrote nearly two years ago that “the media’s lab leak debacle shows why banning ‘misinformation’ is a terrible idea.” The new revelations from the DOE report and Wray’s interview should establish that point with great clarity. 

Preventing debate about the origins of the Covid virus almost certainly reduced public pressure in the United States and other countries for a prompt, genuinely independent, investigation of the Wuhan lab and its security protocols. Whether intentionally or not, the blackout of debate aided the Beijing government’s campaign to exonerate the PRC of any culpability. After such a lengthy passage of time, we now may never be able to discover essential facts. 

Enthusiasts for barring the lab-leak thesis as disinformation not only prevented an important inquiry regarding a crucial issue; they damaged the values of free speech and democratic debate. (Disinformation and the Wuhan Lab Leak Thesis.)

New emails uncovered by House Republicans probing the COVID-19 pandemic reveal the deceptive nature of Dr. Anthony Fauci.  

They show he “prompted” or commissioned — and had final approval on — a scientific paper written specifically in February 2020 to disprove the theory that the virus leaked from a lab in Wuhan, China. 

Eight weeks later, Fauci stood at a White House press conference alongside President Donald Trump and cited that paper as evidence that the lab leak theory was implausible while pretending it had nothing to do with him and he did not know the authors.

“There was a study recently,” he told reporters on April 17, 2020, when asked if the virus could have come from a Chinese lab, “where a group of highly qualified evolutionary virologists looked at the sequences … in bats as they evolve and the mutations that it took to get to the point where it is now is totally consistent with a jump of a species from an animal to a human. 

“So, the paper will be available. I don’t have the authors right now, but we can make it available to you.”

hat paper, titled “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2,” was sent to Fauci for editing in draft form and again for final approval before it was published in Nature Medicine on Feb. 17, 2020. 

It was written four days after Fauci, and his NIH boss Dr. Francis Collins, held a call with the four authors to discuss reports that COVID-19 may have leaked from the Wuhan lab and “may have been intentionally genetically manipulated.” 

The House Oversight subcommittee published emails Sunday in which the paper’s co-author Dr. Kristian Andersen admits Fauci “prompted” him to write the paper with the goal to “disprove” the lab leak theory.

On Feb. 12, 2020, Andersen submitted the paper to Nature Medicine with a cover email: “There has been a lot of speculation, fear-mongering, and conspiracies put forward in this space. [This paper was] Prompted by Jeremy Farrah [sic], Tony Fauci, and Francis Collins.”

Farrar, then head of British nonprofit the Wellcome Trust, which has historic ties to the pharmaceutical industry and the Gates Foundation, was rewarded with the plum role of chief scientist at the World Health Organization last December.

On the day the “Proximal Origin” paper was published, emails show Farrar pushing through a crucial change: “Sorry to micromanage/micro edit! But would you be willing to change one sentence?”

Farrar’s change was to replace the word “unlikely” with “improbable” in a statement about the lab leak origin, so it would read: “It is improbable that SARS-CoV-2 emerged through laboratory manipulation of an existing SARS-related coronavirus.”

Improbable means having a probability too low to inspire belief; unbelievable, even ridiculous.

That’s what Fauci and friends wanted us to think of the lab leak theory that looked probable from the get-go, as one dissenting scientist said at the time, and looks more probable by the day.

The question of why Fauci went to such an effort to obscure the origins of COVID-19 is a major focus of the GOP-led committee. 

While they’re at it, they should quiz the Biden administration’s new “US negotiator for the pandemic accord” at the WHO, Ambassador Pamela Hamamoto, a former campaign bundler and Hawaii schoolmate of Barack Obama. 

Last month she sided with China to keep deliberations around this new international pandemic treaty secret. 

What are they trying to hide? (New emails show Fauci commissioned paper to disprove Wuhan lab leak theory.)

Anthony Fauci is one of those who is incapable of being shamed. This supporter of perversity and the chemical and surgical execution of the innocent preborn is a scheming deceiver who refuses to accept any responsibility for how his “leadership,” such as it was, resulted in the deaths of so many people in 2020 and 2021, the destroyed the lives and livelihoods of untold thousands of people, turned family and friends against one another, and accustomed a large percentage of people into believing the “experts” and accepting all limitations on their legitimate human freedoms even though no real “emergency” existed. 

One secular commentator went so far as to assert that the public health sector’s suppression of truth is the biggest scandal in American history, and that in itself is quite a statement given the long history of this nation’s governmental scandals:

We are living through the largest, deadliest scandal in American history, but the elite media refuses to connect the dots and analyze it.

COVID-19, a disease no one disputes came from Wuhan, China, has killed more than 1.1 million Americans and more than 6.8 million people worldwide. It has left millions of others with chronic health problems.

Because of the teachers’ unions and totally misguided, destructive public health policies, children who were under virtually no risk from COVID-19 have lost at least a year of education. Many children are suffering from depression and other mental health challenges from the forced isolation and lack of social contact.

Now, it is becoming more clear that much of this pain was avoidable – and the result of powerful government employees protecting themselves. As Jarrett Stepman in The Daily Signal wrote:

"In 2020, if you thought it was possible COVID-19 came from a lab in China you were labeled a conspiracy theorist, a peddler of misinformation, ‘bonkers,’ and a racist.

"Facebook and other social media removed the lab leak claim from their apps or slapped ‘misinformation’ labels on it. Facebook did so in lockstep with the government.

"So according to the standard set in 2020, the Department of Energy just came out as a racist purveyor of misinformation this week.

"The Wall Street Journal reported on Sunday that, according to a classified intelligence report provided to the White House and Congress, the Department of Energy concluded that the COVID-19 pandemic likely came from a lab leak.

‘"The Energy Department’s conclusion is the result of new intelligence and is significant because the agency has considerable scientific expertise and oversees a network of U.S. national laboratories, some of which conduct advanced biological research,’ the Wall Street Journal report said."

President Donald Trump called it "the Chinese Virus" and was intensely attacked. Somehow the word "Chinese" was deemed racist. No one disputes that the virus originated in China. But calling it COVID-19 rather than the Chinese virus was more polite. (After all, it’s important to indicate an appropriate sensitivity to the totalitarian dictatorship that is trying to defeat the United States and become the world’s leading power.)

We now know this censorship and speech silencing was part of a systematic effort of senior scientists to mislead the American people. When COVID-19 first became a threat in early 2020, Dr. Anthony Fauci already knew the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) had funded research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology via EcoHealth Alliance. He knew the WIV was a subgrantee of EcoHealth Alliance – and that EcoHealth Alliance was not in compliance with its grant reporting. Specifically, the organization was out of compliance for a project that NIAID knew could potentially make novel bat-borne coronaviruses much more dangerous.

Fauci knew all this.

According to Kentucky Rep. James Comer, who is chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability, on Feb. 1, 2020, "Dr. Fauci, Dr. Collins, and at least eleven other scientists convened a conference call to discuss COVID-19. On the conference call, Drs. Fauci and Collins were first warned that COVID-19 may have leaked from the WIV and may have been intentionally genetically manipulated."

The scientists decided to remain silent to avoid controversy (which would have ultimately fallen back on themselves).

This perfectly captures the arrogance of the aristo-bureaucrats, who believe they are intellectually and morally superior to the people to whom they are supposed to be accountable. They believe they have the right and duty to censor what we think and say – and to feed us falsehoods in the name of some higher duty.

This scandal of many of our best professional researchers lying to the American people is compounded by the absolute failure of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Why there has not been a scathing and thorough investigation – and set of hearings on the absolute inability of the bureaucrats in Atlanta to do their jobs – and the general failure of the public health system across the country is a mystery to me. This lack of introspection or investigation should itself be a scandal.

Driven by the economic impact of the Chinese virus, the American government spent trillions of dollars propping up the economy, sparking inflation, massively increasing the national debt, and permitting hundreds of billions in theft and corruption.

Finally, there has been no serious effort to hold the Chinese Communist dictatorship accountable for the damage it has done around the world. There is ample precedent for holding governments responsible for the damage they have done to others (the Lockerbie bombing, the Iranian hostage crisis, 9/11, and other cases).

The Chinese Communists have continuously focused on stopping us from understanding the origins of the pandemic. As Dave Boyer reported in the Washington Times, FBI Director Christopher A. Wray confirmed his agency believes the COVID-19 pandemic likely started from a lab leak in Wuhan, China. He told Fox News on Tuesday that "the FBI has for quite some time now assessed that the origins of the pandemic are most likely a potential lab incident in Wuhan… Here you are talking about a potential leak from a Chinese government-controlled lab.

As Boyer reported, "Mr. Wray also slammed Beijing for stonewalling international efforts to find out what happened. ‘I will just make the observation that the Chinese government, it seems to me, has been doing its best to try to thwart, and obfuscate the work here, the work that we’re doing, the work that our U.S. government and close foreign partners are doing. And that’s unfortunate for everybody,’ he said."

Clearly there ought to be a mechanism for making the Chinese Communist dictatorship pay COVID-19 victims for the disaster it caused. One step might be a COVID-19 tariff on all Chinese imports (the proceeds of which would go into a COVID-19 Compensation Fund that every American family affected by the pandemic could apply to).

Other countries could be urged to establish similar tariffs. Then Xi Jinping and his dictatorship would learn that lying, covering up, and hiding the truth has enormous costs for those guilty of killing millions and forcing the spending of trillions.

This scandal is so large, and covers so many areas, it will be a major factor in politics and government for the next decade. It will go down in history as a turning point in our lives and the life of our country.

We just need to decide what direction we turn: toward clarity and accountability, or toward lies and chaos. (This is the biggest scandal in American history.)

Dr. Anthony Faucui had every reason to cover up the truth.  

Documents show he played a vital role in funneling through a third party roughly $600,000 in taxpayer money to the Wuhan laboratory in China where the deadly COVID virus may well have leaked. The funds were earmarked for dangerous gain-of-function research that can transform a virus into a lethal "superbug." 

On Wednesday, Dr. Robert Redfield, an experienced virologist who served as the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, testified at a hearing on Capitol Hill that "it is not scientifically plausible" that the virus somehow originated in animals or bats and then spread to humans.   

Fauci knew this because Redfield and four other knowledgeable experts told him so. But Fauci — an immunologist, not a virologist — feared that his suspected complicity in engineering the virus would be revealed. He was determined to suppress the lab leak evidence and, instead, peddle the natural origin theory to the public. He "wanted a single narrative," said Redfield. That "inaccurate" narrative appears to be an effort to absolve himself in the deadliest man-made catastrophe in history.     

Some 6.87 million people worldwide were killed as 760 million became infected. More than a million Americans have died. Did Fauci play a role in causing those deaths? His cover-up suggests he thought so.

Fauci was warned by fellow scientists at the outset of the pandemic in late January and early February of 2020 that the COVID-19 contagion contained unusual features that "(potentially) look engineered inside a laboratory," according to emails. Alarmed, Fauci kicked his deception into overdrive with a deliberate misinformation scheme.  

He covertly commissioned and edited a scientific paper that was published three weeks later that debunked the lab leak hypothesis. Then, while concealing how he instigated the analysis, Fauci publicly touted it as the definitive scientific verdict on COVID’s genesis.  

All the while, he hid his involvement and pretended not to know the co-authors with whom he had secretly worked. Citing the paper, Fauci emphatically told Americans that COVID "could not have been artificially or deliberately manipulated."    

The scientists who published the hasty study had previously confided to Fauci that the virus likely came from a lab but reversed themselves in a matter of three days. Dr. Redfield called that about-face "antithetical to science" and accused Fauci of "an attempt to misguide and redirect debate." 

It is curious that those same scientists became the beneficiaries of millions of dollars in funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under Fauci after their reversal. 

But that’s not all. Recently revealed records show that Fauci colluded with social media platforms to suppress posts that raised the validity of the lab leak theory and discredit anyone who dared to question his contrived narrative.  

Two years ago, I penned a column for Fox News Opinion stating that Fauci should be criminally investigated into whether he lied to Congress when he flatly denied that his agency helped fund the Wuhan research.  

"The NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute," he told a disbelieving Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky.  Afterward, Sen. Paul declared that Fauci had lied. The documented evidence supports that conclusion. In his testimony Wednesday, Dr. Redfield said, "There is no doubt the NIH funded gain-of-function research" at the Chinese lab. 

In the past, Fauci described it as "reverse genetics," which he energetically endorsed despite its known hazards. He never understood the grave consequences of a leak that could kill millions of innocent people. Or perhaps he didn’t care.  

The NIH money sent to the Wuhan lab was specifically designated for "reverse genetics," according to the written grant. This is compelling evidence that Fauci was not truthful when he testified that the NIH did not fund gain-of-function research.     

Intentionally lying while under oath to Congress about a material matter constitutes the felony of perjury (18 USC 1621). The giving of knowingly false and misleading statements during testimony (18 USC 1001) is an equivalent crime regardless of whether the person is under oath. Both offenses result in the same punishment of up to five years behind bars upon conviction.  

As I have argued before, there is more than sufficient evidence to justify an investigation by the Department of Justice as to whether Fauci gave deliberately deceptive or false testimony when he appeared before a Senate committee. 

As the evidence against him mounts, the chronicles of Dr. Anthony Fauci demand a sober reassessment. The man who was lionized as "America’s doctor" is not the saintly figure that he and a sycophantic media have long portrayed. (Anthony Fauci hid the truth about COVID, until now. Also see Why did the scientists deceive everyone about COVID-19?.)

Gregg Jarrett knows the United States Code very well. He cited it repeatedly during the Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton email scandals and during the Russia Collusion delusion. However, nothing happened to Madame Defarge. Nothing happened to any of those who did her bidding within the United States Department of Justice and its Federal Bureau of Investigation in the Russia Collusion delusion. Does any sane individual believe that Merrick Garland, of all people, is going to prosecute Anthony Fauci for lying to Congress? Fauci was in Red China’s hip pocket, and that is exactly where Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., and his family of grifters are to be found as well.

A witness who testified recently before the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic took direct aim at the Communist Chinese government for their role to make possible the “accidental” leak of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in 2019:

An expert witness who testified at the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic hearing on the origins of COVID-19 slammed China for stonewalling international investigators. 

Dr. Jamie Metzl, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, told lawmakers Wednesday that a bipartisan investigation into the origins of COVID-19 is "three years overdue" and must prioritize holding China accountable for its lack of transparency during the pandemic. 

"We are primarily here because the Chinese government has done everything in its power to prevent the type of investigation into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic that is three years overdue and still urgently required. We are also here because there is more that we in the United States can and must do to push forward, even if China continues to stonewall," Metzl said in his opening remarks.  

The Chinese government has denied reports that it has refused to cooperate with the World Health Organization's study into the origins of COVID-19. 

A report published in Nature on Tuesday said that the WHO canceled the "second phase" of its investigations into the origin of the COVID-19 pandemic because China would not permit researchers access to conduct their studies. 

"China’s position on the study of the origins of SARS-CoV-2 is consistent," Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson Wang Wenbin said Wednesday at a press conference in Beijing. "We always support and participate in science-based global origins tracing. At the same time, we firmly oppose all forms of political manipulation."

The spokesman cited two previous envoys of WHO scientists allowed into the country, claiming this demonstrated China was "open" and "transparent" with the international community.

"China has shared more data and research findings on SARS-CoV-2 origins study than any other country," Wang said. "This fully demonstrates China’s open, transparent and responsible attitude and its support for the work of the WHO and SAGO. China will continue to support science-based global origins tracing and keep up communication and cooperation with the WHO."

However, Metzl said that China's flat denial of the lab-leak hypothesis and repeated refusals to turn over data is anything but transparent. 

"While the question of pandemic origins remains open, there can be no doubt that a research-related origin remains a very serious possibility, if not a distinct probability. There is no smoking gun proving a laboratory origin hypothesis, but the growing body of circumstantial evidence suggests a gun that is at very least warm to the touch," he told House lawmakers.  

Metzl said it is "inconceivable" that in the three years since the coronavirus pandemic began there has yet to be a full investigation into the origins of the virus. 

"The primary reason there has been no comprehensive investigation into COVID-19 origins is the reprehensible actions of the Chinese government," he said.  

"Since the early days of the pandemic, China's government has destroyed samples, hidden records, imprisoned brave Chinese journalists, gagged Chinese scientists, actively spread misinformation and done pretty much everything possible to prevent the kind of unfettered, evidence based investigation that is so urgently required," he charged.  

"Every person on earth must demand accountability from China, calling for a full investigation of pandemic origin," Metzl continued, adding that scrutiny on China does not mean the U.S. and others should neglect to scrutinize their own response to the pandemic. 

He said that while the U.S. should continue to seek scientific collaboration and diplomatic relations with China, "we cannot purchase these relationships by our silence." (COVID-19 origins hearing witness blasts China's 'stonewalling'.)

Although very few people are truly paying any kind of attention to these revelations, it is telling that the former director of the United States Centers for Disease Control (CDC), Dr. Robert Redfield, has claimed that he was muscled out of “pandemic” planning by none other than Dr. Anthony Fauci:

 An undeniable example of news media distributing propaganda rather than reliable information was their suppression of the now-vindicated lab leak theory of COVID's origin and the arrogant assertion that it was false. If you pondered this theory out loud on social media in 2020, you were likely to be banned and bizarrely called a racist by journalists too lazy or politically biased to seek the truth.

One would expect better from scientists and public health officials, but sadly, they have been just as bad.

Former Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Dr. Robert Redfield told lawmakers Wednesday that Dr. Anthony Fauci “sidelined” him from internal debates about the origin of COVID-19 at the start of the pandemic, saying the former White House chief medical adviser did not appreciate Redfield’s support for the so-called “lab leak theory.”

“This was an a priori decision that there’s one point of view that we’re going to put out there, and anyone who doesn’t agree with it is going to be sidelined,” Redfield said at a hearing of the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic. “And as I say, I was only the CDC director, and I was sidelined.”

Redfield, 71, told Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) that his support for the theory that the coronavirus accidentally emerged from a laboratory in Wuhan, China — rather than jumping from animals to humans — likely prompted his exclusion from high-level discussions of the outbreak.

“I think I made it very clear in January [2020] to all of them why we had to aggressively pursue this,” he said. “And I let them know as a virologist that I didn’t see that this was anything like SARS or MERS. … And they knew that was how I was thinking.”

Redfield added that he was not aware that Fauci and then-National Institutes of Health Director Francis Collins had convened a conference call on Feb. 1, 2020 to discuss the worldwide outbreak until internal emails were published by the Washington Post and Buzzfeed News in June 2021.

“I didn’t know there was a February 1 conference call until the Freedom of Information came out with the emails, and I was quite upset, as the CDC director, that I was excluded from those discussions,” he said.

“Why would they do this?” Comer asked.

“Because I had a different point of view,” Redfield responded. “And I was told that they had made a decision that they would keep this confidential until they came up with a single narrative — which I will argue is antithetical to science.”

He added: “Science never selects a single narrative. We foster — as my colleagues just said — we foster debate. And we’re confident that with debate, science will eventually get to the truth.”

The day before the call, on Jan. 31, 2020, Dr. Kristian Andersen and Dr. Robert Garry emailed Fauci pointing out anomalies in the virus that suggested it was not of natural origin — only to backtrack days later under pressure from Fauci.

In his email, Andersen wrote the virus had “unusual features” that “(potentially) look engineered” and that he and other scientists “all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory.”

Following the Feb. 1 call, Garry wrote in another email that “I really can’t think of a plausible natural scenario” for the emergence of the virus.

Redfield told House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) he was excluded from those emails as well.

“Three years ago, if you thought it came from a lab, you got called a nutjob, you got censored on Twitter, you got blacklisted on Twitter,” Jordan said. “You were even called a crackpot by the very same scientists who in late January [2020] sent emails to Dr. Fauci and said it came from a lab. They called you crackpot. Is that right, Dr. Redfield?”

“I think the most upsetting thing to me was the Baltimore Sun calling me a racist because I said this came from a Wuhan lab,” Redfield replied.

A former New York Times science editor also ripped Fauci during the hearing for repeatedly seeking to discredit the lab leak theory — just days after newly released emails showed the medical adviser commissioned a paper in February 2020 meant to disprove it.

“Fauci was probably not too pleased to hear that the virus might have escaped from research that his agency had funded,” said Nicholas Wade, who also served as an editor for the journals Nature and Science.

Wade was referring to experiments conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology with funding from the National Institutes of Health and Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which was routed to the Chinese institution through the New York-based EcoHealth Alliance.

The journalist and author pointed the finger of blame squarely at Fauci and Collins: “It’s hard to believe that in the twilight of their long careers, they would seriously mishandle an issue as important as the origin of the COVID virus, yet that is what the evidence seems to point to.”

“The national media swallowed the natural origins story unskeptically, and once committed to it, failed to report important contrary evidence,” he added.

Wade noted that within days of the Feb. 1 conference call, Andersen had repudiated his initial suspicions and stood squarely behind the natural origin theory backed by Fauci.

“Andersen in an email on Feb. 4 … [derided] the lab leak as a crackpot theory,” he said. “What made him change his mind? No new scientific evidence came to light.”

In a Feb. 12, 2020 email released by the select committee on Sunday, Andersen said Fauci and Collins had “prompted” him to write a study to debunk the lab leak theory. The email was submitted with an article on the subject to Nature Medicine.

The article was published five days later and was cited by Fauci from the White House briefing room exactly two months after that — with the top doc never revealing his own role in its creation. (Ex-CDC chief: Fauci 'sidelined' me from COVID debate.)

What is tragic about all this important information is that so few people, distracted by the vast panoply of bread and circuses that the adversary uses for purposes of agitation and distraction, either pay any attention to these facts or, if they do, either dismiss them as unimportant or justify

Fauci’s use of subterfuge to transform the people of the United States of America from their “obsession with freedom” to his own preferred mode of governance according to the “enlightened model” used by the repressive, murderous thugs of the so-called People’s Republic of China.

A recent editorial in the New York Post summarized the facts about Dr. Anthony Fauci’s lies as follows:

The beatification of St. Anthony Fauci continues apace, with a PBS “American Masters” docu-stravaganza devoted to him airing last week. 

Does the man behind our disastrous federal pandemic response have any regrets? Yes! the tonguebath film reveals: That he didn’t demand useless lockdowns and universal masking sooner.

“Maybe I should have done that,” he muses. “Yeah, I was wrong.”

That sums it up. Even now, when all available data confirms that nothing — nothing — Fauci did made the slightest difference against the virus, the man is still convinced his only failing was being too soft on his recalcitrant subjects . . . er, the American people.  

Consider his massive flip-flop on masking. Did he make a mistake?

No, he “got additional information” that caused him to change his tune.

What utter bull: The balance of scientific evidence has never shown that mask mandates help against airborne viruses.

The only thing that changed was public health officials’ growing need to recommend something to justify their existence. 

Then there’s his claim, to a vaccine-hesitant DC resident, that the vaccines all but stop transmission.

It’s a “very, very, very rare chance that you do get it even if you’re vaccinated.”

Wrong.

In April of 2022, while Fauci was still in the driver’s seat, more than 60% of new cases nationally were breakthrough infections

He pooh-poohs the lab-leak theory of COVID origins in the film as well: “Like, what are you talking about,” he chortles vapidly. 

Ask the FBI, Department of Energy and countless leading scientists, Tony.

Including some it sure looks like you possibly bullied or bribed into shutting up to conceal your own role in funding gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. 

“American Masters” used to focus on people who made significant cultural contributions to our society, like Billie Holiday, Richard Avedon and Lucille Ball. Fauci sticks out not only for not being an artist or creator, but having made our country worse instead of better. 

The doctor’s anti-science, politically driven COVID strategy — i.e., serial capitulations to progressive hysteria on masking, school closures, lockdowns and vaccinations, as well as desperate efforts at butt-covering — immiserated millions, disrupted society and inflicted irrecoverable learning loss on a generation of school kids. 

Its ugly aftermath can still be seen in everything from our persistent inflation to elevated levels of crime. 

And all for nothing. The US did not perform meaningfully better in terms of overall COVID outcomes than countries that never locked down or masked up. 

Another of his on-camera interlocutors has the Good Doctor’s number, however. “Your campaign is about fear.

It’s about inciting fear in people. You all attack people with fear,” says one skeptic. (Fauci on film is still flinging fear-mongering flim-flam.)

The likes of Fauci and his former White House compatriot, Dr. Deborah Birx, are embedded throughout the global healthcare system, especially in the so-called “public health” sector, pharmaceutical companies, in universities, allegedly “independent” “think tanks,” and throughout the mainslime media, and they all responsible for the completely needless genocide perpetrated against innocent human beings by means of their cookie-cutter, one-size-fits-all medical protocols, that called, it should be noted, for late and not early intervention in the virus’s treatment, and, of course, by means of the “vaccines” that injured and killed untold thousands upon thousands of people throughout the world.

The Red Chinese-style censorship that Dr. Anthony Fauci employed to prevent true information about the source of the Wuhan Virus was employed in equal measure to suppress all true scientific information and empirical facts about the harm caused the “vaccines” developed by Donald John Trump’s Operation Warp Speed:

In the latest Twitter Files report published on Friday, journalist and author Matt Taibbi revealed that Twitter partnered with the Virality Project, which warned the social media platform that “true stories that could fuel hesitancy,” complained that “anti-vaccine” accounts were retweeting the CDC, and ironically ran searches for the term “surveillance state” while looking for more information to censor.

“The release of Dr. Anthony Fauci’s spring 2020 emails via the Freedom of Information Act has been used to exacerbate distrust in Dr. Fauci,” the Virality Project lamented in June 2021.

The Virality Project is “a sweeping, cross-platform effort to monitor billons of social media posts by Stanford University, federal agencies, and a slew of (often state-funded) NGOs,” Taibbi noted.

Taibbi went on to say that Friday’s Twitter Files revealed “Reports of vaccinated individuals contracting Covid-19 anyway,” “natural immunity,” suggesting Covid-19 “leaked from a lab,” and even “worrisome jokes” were all characterized as “potential violations” or disinformation “events” by the Virality Project.

We’ve since learned the Virality Project in 2021 worked with government to launch a pan-industry monitoring plan for Covid-related content,” Taibbi said. “At least six major Internet platforms were ‘onboarded’ to the same JIRA ticketing system, daily sending millions of items for review.”

The journalist added that the Virality Project had “knowingly targeted true material and legitimate political opinion, while often being factually wrong itself.”

“As Orwellian proof-of-concept, the Virality Project was a smash success,” he said. “Government, academia, and an oligopoly of would-be corporate competitors organized quickly behind a secret, unified effort to control political messaging.”

The Virality Project had also “accelerated the evolution of digital censorship, moving it from judging truth/untruth to a new, scarier model, openly focused on political narrative at the expense of fact,” Taibbi said.

The Twitter Files also revealed that on February 5, 2021, right after President Joe Biden took office, Stanford wrote to Twitter to discuss the Virality Project. Shortly after that, Twitter agreed to receive weekly reports on “anti-vax disinformation.”

The Virality Project also warned Twitter that “true stories that could fuel hesitancy,” including stories such as “celebrity deaths after vaccine,” as well as the closure of a central New York school due to reports of post-vaccine illness.

The organization suggested that stories like these be considered “Standard Vaccine Misinformation on Your Platform.”

In one email to Twitter, the Virality Project mentioned what it called the “vaccine passport narrative,” saying “concerns” over such programs “have driven a larger anti-vaccination narrative about the loss of rights and freedoms.”

The organization also framed this as a misinformation “event.”

The Virality Project routinely framed real testimonials about vaccine side effects as misinformation — from “true stories” of blood clots from AstraZeneca vaccines, to a New York Times story about vaccine recipients who contracted the blood disorder thrombocytopenia, Taibbi said.

The Virality Project also warned against people “just asking questions,” suggesting it was a tactic “commonly used by spreaders of misinformation.”

Twitter employees eventually mimicked Virality Project language, describing “campaigns against vaccine passports,” “fear of mandatory immunizations,” and “misuse of official reporting tools” as “potential violations.”

“While this account posts legitimate and accurate COVID-19 updates — it posts content that attacks Italian politicians, the EU, and the United States,” the Global Engagement Center complained to Twitter in an email.

The Twitter Files also reveal an email in which the Virality Project implored Twitter to “hone in” on an “increasingly popular narrative about natural immunity.”

But the organization was “repeatedly, extravagantly wrong,” Taibbi said, noting one example in April 2021, when the Virality Project mistakenly described “breakthrough” infections as “extremely rare events” that should not be inferred to mean “vaccines are ineffective.”

Later, after the CDC changed its methodology for counting cases of the Chinese coronavirus among vaccinated people to only include those resulting in hospitalization or death, the Virality Project complained that “anti-vaccine” accounts were retweeting the information.

Finally, in an amusing yet chilling case of irony, the Twitter Files also revealed that the Virality Project ran searches for the term “surveillance state.”

A year later, the organization issued a report calling for a “rumor-control mechanism to address nationally trending narratives,” and a “Misinformation and Disinformation Center of Excellence” to be housed within CISA, at the Department of Homeland Security.

And one day later, DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas infamously announced that a “Disinformation Governance Board” had been created, and that it was to be led by censor Nina Jankowicz. (Twitter Files: The 'Great Covid-19 Lie Machine' Worked to Censor 'True Stories'.)

Suppressing truth, disseminating lies,

Just another day’s work for the totalitarians who like to play God in life without realizing that they face a harsh judgment after death if they do not repent and convert to the Holy Faith beforehand.

The Cookie-Cutter Strategy Killed People

It was after Dr. Anthony Fauci was chosen to be the "czar” overseeing the Federal government’s “response” to the coronavirus outbreak that he, a career apparatchik, became a ubiquitous presence on television, radio, and the various forms that are called by the masses as “social communication.” Throughout his newfound fame and the popularity that accompanied it in 2020. Fauci disparaged the role of natural immunity, exaggerated the virus’s lethal potential, discouraged early doctors to intervene early once cases of the virus had been diagnosed, and constantly shut down all discussion of advantages to be found in treating patients with hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, and massive doses of Vitamins C and D as well as Zinc tailored to the specific needs, the general health, and the age of each patient.

Dr. Peter McCullough wrote the following commentary explaining how the rejection of early intervention in the case of high risk (the elderly, those suffering from preexisting comorbidities) patients who had contracted the virus was responsible for deaths among them in the State of Texas, noting that the deaths had nothing to do with lower vaccination rates in the Lone Star State:

Recently a tweet popped up implying that lower Texas vaccination rates were responsible for deaths with COVID-19 through 2021 and mid 2022. I live in Texas and have been treating patients with high risk COVID-19 from the very start of the crisis.

Despite all the hopes and aspirations for those pushing vaccine ideology, prospective, randomized, double-blind placebo controlled trials in 2020 never demonstrated reductions in hospitalization and death. As a result, no therapeutic claim of survival can be made by anyone. Reduction in the risk of death is listed in the “benefit” section of vaccine consent form. COVID-19 vaccines have never saved lives.

Of the ~90,000 deaths through September 1, 2022, and ~40,000 after May 1, 2022 when vaccines had been widely deployed for five months, none of them were prevented by COVID-19 vaccination. By December, 2021, failure of COVID-19 vaccines was very obvious with the Omicron outbreak which was largely among the fully vaccinated.

 

Adapted from Hotez PJ (2022) The great Texas COVID tragedy. PLOS Glob Public Health 2(10): e0001173. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001173

The real tragedy in Texas and all over the world was the absolute or relative lack of early combination therapeutics at home in high risk COVID-19. Gkioulekas et al concluded that by December of 2020, we had clear and convincing evidence (P<0.01) that early treatment was effective in reducing hospitalization death, a claim that could never be made for COVID-19 vaccines. Verkerk et al demonstrated the vast majority of hospitalizations and deaths occurred as a result of little or no access to early combination therapy. Failure to treat resulting in avoidable death is always a tragedy.

In conclusion, readers of the peer-reviewed literature and social media should be wary of vaccine ideology as promoted by those with a vested interest in developing vaccines, NIH funding, or close ties to the biopharmaceutical complex. Early therapeutics has been a bright spot in the pandemic. High-risk index cases among the vaccinated and unvaccinated benefitted from compassionate care which was the best chance to survive the illness and avoid hospitalization and death. (Great Texas COVID-19 Tragedy.)

In other words, Doctors Anthony Fauci, Deborah Birx, Francis Collins, et al., worked actively to prevent early intervention and to disparage, if not entirely forbid, the use of common-sense remedies, many of which are to be found on an over-the-counter basis, something that Dr. McCullough explained in some detail:

Over three years into the pandemic with nearly the entire country having become sick with SARS-CoV-2, a virus engineered to invade the body, there are millions suffering with long-hauler syndrome. Approximately half of patients admitted to the ICU with COVID-19 will have post-COVID syndrome which is now understood to be due to persistence of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein within cells, tissues, and organs. Those vaccinated have been additionally loaded with Spike, so may have even a worse course with prolonged symptoms including fatigue, lethargy, brain fog, muscle loss, skin and hair changes, sleeplessness, and effort intolerance. The magnitude of the problem has driven an all-encompassing search for management strategies to resolve the syndrome(s).

 

Hope is on the horizon with a preprint paper published by Halma et al summarizing the prescription drug and over-the-counter candidates for therapy. In my practice, I stylize the approach based on the patient and how recent the COVID-19 infection was in their history. If there are lingering signs of infection, then a course of full dose ivermectin can be considered. Aspirin is reasonable given increased rates of heart attack and stroke after the illness. I have found the colchicine appears to have an important role in pleurodynia or chest wall discomfort. Additionally it is used with corticosteroids in vaccine-induced myopericarditis. Low-dose naltrexone has been reported to ameliorate fatigue and inanition. Metformin has supportive data and would be appropriate in pre-diabetes and those with diabetes mellitus.

 

Halma, M.T.; Plothe, C.; Lawrie, T. Strategies for the Management of Spike Protein-Related Pathology. Preprints 2023, 2023030344. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202303.0344.v1.

 

From the OTC list, I have found nattokinase, the Japanese product derived from natto (a traditional Japanese food made from whole soybeans that have been fermented with Bacillus subtilis var. natto.) to be the most compelling and scientifically supported approach to clear Spike protein out of the body via proteolytic degradation. A host of cellular protective, anti-oxidant approaches are listed with vitamin C and NAC being readily available and widely used.

 

Halma, M.T.; Plothe, C.; Lawrie, T. Strategies for the Management of Spike Protein-Related Pathology. Preprints 2023, 2023030344. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202303.0344.v1.

Patients should push their doctors to refer them to clinical trials, and when that is not feasible, then empiric therapy can be pursued. It is important to realize that in the absence of completed large randomized placebo controlled randomized trials, which are easily 5 or more years away in the future, no therapeutic claims can be made. In the meantime we must be perceptive as patients and open-minded as clinicians to come up with reasonable approaches that can be used to help those sick now with post-COVID syndromes. (Prescription and Over-the-Counter Treatments for Post-COVID Syndrome.)

Dr. McCullough has also explained how the human immune system responds to foreign body invaders such as vaccines developed in Operation Warp Speed to “fight” the Wuhan Virus:

The human immune system is designed to recognize foreign invaders (microbes, other substances) attack, kill, and then clear the debris away. For that reason, we must be sure that our bodies recognize our own cells as “protected” and the foreign ones as targets. For the first time, mRNA (Pfizer, Moderna) and adenoviral DNA (Janssen) COVID-19 vaccines install the genetic code for our bodies to make a deadly foreign protein with the aspiration that our immune system would not only respond and protect us, but also form live saving immunity from SARS-CoV-2. We have come to learn this was the drug development miscalculation of all time. Production of a foreign protein in the human body has turned out to be a disaster as illustrated by Polykretis et al in a recent paper. Here are some of the reasons why: 1) each cell that takes up the vaccine expresses the protein in the cell surface initiating autoimmune attack, 2) the tissue distribution appears to be wide involving organs where this attack could be lethal (heart, brain, bone marrow, etc.), 3) both the genetic material and the Spike protein are long lasting (months to years) which is long enough to cause an autoimmune syndrome which may be permanent.

Polykretis elaborates: “ Strong histological evidence from biopsies and autopsies have demonstrated that the vaccine-derived spike protein was synthesized in terminally differentiated tissues (Baumeier et al., 2022; Schwab et al., 2022; Mörz, 2022). Baumeier et al. detected the vaccine-derived spike protein on the cardiomyocytes of 9 out of 15 patients with clinical suspicion of myocarditis (which were negatively tested for SARS-CoV-2), proving that the viral protein has been synthesized in the heart tissue and suggesting an autoimmune response due to vaccination (Baumeier et al., 2022). Schwab et al. describe the histopathological findings from standardized autopsies performed on 25 people who had passed away unexpectedly and within 20 days from vaccination (none of the deceased persons had SARS-CoV-2 infection prior to vaccination) (Schwab et al., 2022). Both the aforementioned studies support the idea that vaccine-induced myocardial inflammation was a consequence of excessive T-lymphocytic infiltration, predominantly CD4+ T-cells, which are the main drivers of autoimmunological myocardial injury. Mörz described the expression of the vaccine-derived spike protein in the brain and the heart of a patient who developed multifocal necrotizing encephalitis upon vaccination with BNT162b2 (Mörz, 2022). Immunohistochemistry also revealed the expression of the vaccine-encoded spike protein in the vesicular keratinocytes and the endothelial cells in the dermis (Yamamoto et al., 2022).”

Despite having a long development pathway driven by the US Military DARPA in the ADEPT P3 Program announced in 2012, genetic vaccines have been poorly conceived by contractors without careful consideration of the biological ramifications of autoimmunity. To make matters worse, they were rushed through human clinical development by Operation Warp Speed and were too widely deployed, with 92% of the US population injected at least once according to the CDC. As a result, we have nearly the entire US population at risk for or with some subclinical manifestation of autoimmunity.

At this point, the best course is to remove the COVID-19 vaccines from human use as I have testified in the US Senate on December 7, 2022. The medical community needs to pick up the pieces with a giant research effort on vaccine injury pathophysiology with a major focus on autoimmunity. (Why the Body Attacks Itself after COVID-19 Vaccination.)

Another recent of Dr. McCullough’s explained that the fear of contracting coronavirus, which it can make people very sick and produce long-term effects in some cases but is not generally lethal if treated early and in the cases of those who do not suffer from any preexisting comorbidities, is no reason to get “vaccinated” with poisons that have a track record of producing truly life-threatening blood-clots:

Proponents of COVID-19 mass vaccination acknowledge that similar disastrous outcomes occur with both SARS-CoV-2 infection and the COVID-19 vaccines (myocarditis, blood clots, neurological problems). They position a tradeoff and suggest you should risk it with the vaccine in hopes its lower than that of the infection. Since 94% of Americans have had the COVID-19, its water under the bridge for the infection. Early therapy reduces the invasive systemic manifestations of the illness and markedly reduces hospitalization and death including from complications. With vaccination its a different story, the full force of engineered Spike protein is felt in the body with each shot and per case, the severity of the side effect is far worse than that with COVID-19.

Tu, et al illustrated this principle while analyzing central venous thrombosis which is a blood clot in the major vein of the brain which is a medical emergency requiring, hospitalization, intravenous or subcutaneous blood thinners, serial imaging, observation and in some cases surgery. Tu attempted to divide cases by large denominators to minimize risk; that is invalid in safety research since not all cases can be found particularly fatal ones without an autopsy. The important findings from Tu are in the tables. Central venous thrombosis after vaccination was a catastrophe with more cases, greater need for therapy, more brain surgery, and higher degrees of neurologic impairment at discharge for those who took the mRNA vaccine.

Under no circumstances could someone accept a blood clot in the brain with the vaccine in the hopes of not getting COVID-19. That tradeoff is untenable and yet another reason why vaccine promoters have lost trust from a discerning public.. (Central Venous Thrombosis of the Brain after SARS-CoV-2 Infection and mRNA Vaccination.)

As longtime readers of this website should know by now, the Lockean construct that spawned liberalism and all other political ideologies in its erroneous wake is based upon the fallacious belief that a majority of “reasonable men” can perfect the “state of nature” by entering into a social contract that requires them to relinquish their claim to total liberty in order to enjoy the benefits of a well-ordered society. If, however, the contract fails to be produce the desired results the same or some subsequent majority of “reasonable men” could alter or abolish the contract to resolve this or that social problem, leading men to believe that it is possible for them to “solve” social problems on their own unaided powers by creating more and more structures and programs that require them to relinquish more and more of their liberties to a government that is said to possess the means to provide for that which the majority desires.

The problem with all this, apart from the fact that it ignores Special Creation, Original Sin, Our Lord’s Incarnation and Redemptive Act, and His founding of one true Church, the Catholic Church, is that it is impossible for men to “perfect” a world that is marred by the effects of Original Sins and our own Actual Sins, Men must strive to reform their lives by cooperating with the graces that Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ won them by the shedding of every single drop of His Most Precious Blood during His Passion and Death on the wood of the Holy Cross on Good Friday and that flow into our souls through the loving hands of Our Lady, she who is the Mediatrix of All Graces as well as our Co-Redemptrix and Advocate. To believe that men can create various structures to “solve” social problems that are cased by fallen human nature is Pelagianism, and it results over the course of the time in the creation so many new “programs that vest so much control in the hands of government apparatchiks that only wind up worsening social conditions. Those blinded by this heresy and who think purely in naturalistic terms never learn any lessons from the failures of their previous schemes, which is why they must resort to ever more draconian means to control situations that are intractable to resolve by all their projects, programs, paradigms, and mandates. In other words, the Lockean construct produces men who, refusing to accept the false premises of their belief system, must live their lives as blind moles finding “solutions” where none are to be found.

Thus, the Bill Gates and Red Chinese controlled World Health Organization is “doubling down” on its one-size-fits-all cookie cutter responses to engineered pandemics by means of the global “pandemic treaty” that is nothing other than a surrender of national sovereignty and whatever legitimate human liberty (which is to be distinguished from the licentiousness that is at the root of the Lockean construct; one is never morally free to do that which is proscribed by the binding precepts of the Divine and Natural Laws, which means that one does not “give up” his claim to do anything he desires as he is not morally free to do so) remains after the creeping socialism of the past century:

In the Children’s Health Defense video above, aired February 11, 2023, host Dr. Meryl Nass interviews investigative journalist James Corbett about the global biosecurity agenda, the World Health Organization’s mishandling of global pandemics, and the two parallel processes currently underway that will effectively create a One World Government of unelected bureaucrats under the guise of global biosecurity. In a nutshell, the WHO is being installed as a de facto governing body for the global Deep State.

Attack No. 1 — International Health Regulation Amendments

As reported by Nass, February 6, 2023, the WHO released a report by the director-general on the WHO’s review of amendments to the international health regulations (IHR). The IHR, adopted in 2005, is what empowers the WHO to declare a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC).1

This is a special legal category that allows the WHO to initiate certain contracts and procedures, including drug and vaccine contracts. While the IHR already grants the WHO exceptional power over global health policy, under the current rules, member states must voluntarily consent to the WHO’s recommendations.

Under the new amendments, however, the WHO would be able to declare a PHEIC in a member state over the objection of that state, and failure to adhere to the WHO’s dictates in such a situation could have severe economic consequences.

As a whole, the proposed IHR amendments establish a global biosecurity architecture involving health surveillance, reporting and management — and we the public have no say in the matter.

We have no official avenue for providing feedback to the World Health Assembly, even though the amendments will give the WHO unprecedented power to restrict our rights and freedoms in the name of biosecurity. There’s not even a publicly available list of who the delegates are or who will vote on the amendments.

All we currently know is that the amendments will be ready for adoption at the World Health Assembly in May 2024.2 A simple majority is required for the amendments to be adopted, after which they’ll come into force in 12 months. Member nations that disagree with the amendments have only 10 months to file a rejection or reservation.

Important IHR Amendments

While more than 300 amendments to the IHR have been proposed,3 and there’s no telling which will stay and which will be tossed out, certain ones that are currently up for review are more crucial than others. Here are a few of the most egregious:

• Permissiveness of conflicts of interest and bias are baked in — Under Article 9, the WHO can declare a public health emergency based on information from undisclosed sources.

Those sources could include Big Pharma, WHO funders such as the Gates Foundation and the Gates-founded-and-funded GAVI Alliance, or any number of other players with conflicts of interest. The WHO’s risk assessments will also be based on the same type of flawed modeling and prognostication that so grossly exaggerated the risk of COVID-19.4

• Elimination of national sovereignty — Under Article 12, the director-general has unilateral power to declare a public health emergency and is not required to consult with the WHO Emergency Committee and/or the member state before doing so. So, the director-general replaces any and all national sovereign authority. The director-general can also impose sanctions on nations that refuse to follow its dictates.5

• Expansion of situations that constitute a PHEIC — A PHEIC is currently defined as an “extraordinary event” in one country that constitutes “a public health risk to other states through the international spread of disease and to potentially require a coordinated international response.”

Amendments seek to expand and broaden this definition to include things like clusters of infection with potential but unverified human-to-human transmission. The actual risks of such clusters need not even be evaluated. What’s more, the proposed definition of a PHEIC does not specify that it must involve “severe” or “life-threatening” disease, so it could be invoked for just about anything.

One of the amendments also suggests giving the director-general the ability to declare an “intermediate public health alert” when the situation doesn’t fully meet the PHEIC criteria. In such an event, the director-general and/or a regional WHO director would be able to declare a public health emergency of regional concern (PHERC).6

• Expansion of the WHO’s executive emergency powers to include:7

◦ Permanent biosurveillance capacities

◦T he authority to allocate health products worldwide

◦ The authority to develop regulatory guidelines for the fast-tracking of health products

◦The capacity to “counter the dissemination of false and unreliable information” about public health events, preventive strategies and pandemic countermeasures

◦ The authority to develop “an interoperability mechanism for secure global digital exchange of health information,” i.e., a global health database to enable the implementation of vaccine passports

Once the amendments are adopted by the World Health Assembly, nations will have only a limited time — six months — to reject them. Any nation which hasn’t officially rejected the amendments will then be legally bound by them, and any attempt to reject them after the six-month grace period will be null and void.

Attack No. 2 — The WHO Pandemic Treaty

The IHR amendments are just one part of the globalist cabal’s two-pronged attempt to create the foundation for a One World Government of unelected globalists. The second attempt to seize global control is through an international pandemic treaty with the WHO.

Right now, it looks like the WHO Pandemic Treaty may also be ratified at the World Health Assembly in May 2024, if it gets the two-thirds majority it needs to pass.8^,9 The WHO is seeking permanent and unilateral power to make pandemic decisions for the world, and the proposed treaty is the vehicle that would allow this.

It will grant the WHO the sole power to make decisions relating to global biosecurity, including but not limited to the implementation of a global vaccine passport/digital identity, mandatory vaccinations, travel restrictions and standardized medical care. Importantly, the treaty will supersede the laws of member states, including the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights.

The WHO Is Corrupt and Inept

Even if centralizing biosecurity were a good idea, which it’s not, the WHO would not be at the top of the list of organizations to be charged with this task, seeing how its “curriculum vitae” is a long list of failures and scandalous conflicts of interest.

For example, the WHO didn’t publicly admit SARS-CoV-2 was airborne until the end of December 2021, yet scientists knew the virus was airborne within weeks of the pandemic being declared. The WHO also ignored early advice about airborne transmission.

The fact that the WHO has installed Dr. Jeremy Farrar, former head of the Wellcome Trust, as its chief scientist is yet another sign that the WHO’s health recommendations will be far from trustworthy. As previously reported, Farrar was one of the key figures in the coordinated cover-up of the origin of SARS-CoV-2,10 along with Dr. Anthony Fauci.

Overall, the WHO is woefully unqualified to make health decisions for the whole world. But with this treaty in place, member nations will be subject to the WHO’s dictates even if citizens have rejected such plans using local democratic processes. In short, every country that signs onto the WHO’s pandemic treaty will voluntarily give up its sovereignty and the bodily autonomy of all its citizens to one of the most corrupt organizations on the planet.

As noted by Francis Boyle, a bioweapons expert and professor of international law at the University of Illinois College of Law:11

“Both [the IHR amendments and the treaty] are fatally dangerous. Either one or both would set up a worldwide medical police state under the control of the WHO, and in particular WHO Director-General Tedros.

If either one or both of these go through, Tedros or his successor will be able to issue orders that will go all the way down the pipe to your primary care physicians.”

The Pandemic Treaty Is Based on a Flawed Premise

Aside from the fact that this treaty will eradicate the national sovereignty of member states, a core problem is that it simply cannot work. The whole premise behind this pandemic treaty is that “shared threat requires shared response,” but a given threat is almost never equally shared across regions.

Take COVID-19 for example. Not only is the risk of COVID not the same for people in New York City and the outback of Australia, it’s not even the same for all the people in those areas, as COVID is highly dependent on age and underlying health conditions.

The WHO intends to eliminate individualized medicine and provide blanket rulings for how a given threat is to be addressed, and this can only result in needless suffering and loss of individual freedom.

The WHO insists that the remedy is the same for everyone everywhere, yet the risks vary widely from nation to nation, region to region, person to person. They intend to eliminate individualized medicine and provide blanket rulings for how a given threat is to be addressed, and this can only result in needless suffering — not to mention the loss of individual freedom.

The Long-Term Plan: One-Size-Fits-All Health Care

Eventually, the WHO will probably implement a universal or “socialist-like” health care system worldwide, as part of The Great Reset. While a WHO-based universal health care system is not currently being discussed, there’s every reason to suspect that this is part of the plan.

WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has previously stated that his “central priority” as director-general is to push the world toward universal health coverage.12

And, considering the WHO changed its definition of “pandemic” to “a worldwide epidemic of a disease,”13 without the original specificity of severe illness that causes high morbidity,14^,15 just about anything could be made to fit the pandemic criterion. As mentioned above, some of the IHR amendments also further broaden the scope of the situations in which a public health emergency might be applied.

Sustainable Goals Will Fall Under the WHO’s Purview

The WHO’s “One Health surveillance” initiative, which is part of the pandemic treaty, also signals where this is really headed. As explained by The Epoch Times:16

“One Health is a concept that has been embraced by the United Nations, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the World Bank, and other global organizations.

‘The term originally meant a way of seeing human and animal health as linked — they sometimes are — so that you could improve human health by acting more broadly,’ [public health physician and former WHO epidemic policy staffer David] Bell said.

‘It has become hijacked and now is used to claim that all human activities, and all issues within the biosphere, affect health, and are therefore within Public Health’s remit.

So public health can be deemed to include climate, or racism, or fisheries management, and this is being used to claim that addressing carbon emissions is a health issue and therefore a health ’emergency.'”

Redefining Human Rights

The pandemic treaty is also redefining human rights into a set of collective rights that are centered on public health. The Epoch Times continues:17

“The accord presents human rights as ‘health equity, through resolute action on social, environmental, cultural, political and economic determinants of health.’

In line with that concept, countries such as Austria went so far as to criminalize the refusal to take the COVID vaccine. Within the United States, places that included New York City mandated vaccine passports for access to public spaces, dividing its residents into a privileged vaccinated class and a second-tier unvaccinated class.

However, others see human rights not in terms of collective health but rather as individual rights, including such things as personal sovereignty, the ability of individuals to make their own choices, the right of people to have a voice in medical decisions that affect them, free speech, and freedom of movement and assembly.

Following World War II and the state-control ideologies of fascism, national socialism, and communism, ‘it was realized that there has to be a fundamental understanding that individuals are sovereign,’ Bell said.

Human rights declarations after the war emphasized that, even during times of crisis, ‘we are born with rights, we’re all equal, and those rights are inviolable. That is being very much watered down or wiped away in order to do this [treaty].'”

The Gateway to Global Totalitarianism

It’s important to realize that the WHO’s pandemic treaty will radically alter the global power structure and strip you of some of your most basic rights and freedoms. It’s a direct attack on the sovereignty of its member states, as well as a direct attack on your bodily autonomy.

The treaty is basically the gateway to a global, top-down totalitarian regime where human rights as we understand them will no longer exist. Biosecurity will be the justification for an international vaccine passport, which the G20 just signed on to, and that passport will also be your digital identification.

That digital ID, in turn, will be tied to your social credit score, personal carbon footprint tracker, medical records, educational records, work records, social media presence, purchase records, your bank accounts and a programmable central bank digital currency (CBDC).

Once all these pieces are fully connected, you’ll be in a digital prison, and the ruling cabal — whether officially a one world government by then or not — will have total control over your life from cradle to grave.

The WHO’s pandemic treaty is what sets off this chain of events, as it will have the power to implement vaccine passports globally once the treaty is signed. The WHO will also have the power to mandate vaccines, standardize medical care and issue travel restrictions.

Can US Constitution Be Circumvented?

As reported by The Epoch Times,18 there’s great confusion about whether or not the U.S. government can bind the country to treaties and agreements without the consent of the Senate (as required under the Constitution), and whether international accords can circumvent or supersede the Constitution.

As currently written, there’s no doubt both the IHR amendments and the pandemic treaty are intended to nullify the U.S. Constitution, as the U.S. would have to comply with the WHO’s recommendations, even if such recommendations violate Constitutional rights. The Epoch Times reports:19

“The zero draft concedes that, per international law, treaties between countries must be ratified by national legislatures, thus respecting the right of their citizens to consent.

However, the draft also includes a clause that the accord will go into effect on a ‘provisional’ basis as soon as it’s signed by delegates to the WHO and would, therefore, be legally binding on members without being ratified by legislatures.

‘Whoever drafted this clause knew as much about U.S. constitutional law and international law as I did, and deliberately drafted it to circumvent the power of the Senate to give its advice and consent to treaties, to provisionally bring it into force immediately upon signature,’ Boyle said.

In addition, ‘the Biden administration will take the position that this is an international executive agreement that the president can conclude of his own accord without approval by Congress and is binding on the United States of America, including all state and local democratically elected officials, governors, attorney generals, and health officials’ …

Increasingly, the Biden administration is looking toward international agreements to do what it can’t achieve through Congress.

Most recently, having failed to increase corporate taxes in Congress, the Biden administration entered into an international agreement with the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)20 to set minimum tax levels on all corporations within signatory countries.

While Republican lawmakers said the agreement has ‘no path forward’ toward approval as a treaty, provisions written into the agreement allow foreign countries to tax U.S.-based corporate profits as a punitive measure if senators don’t approve it.”

Senators Introduce Bill to Require Senate Approval

Fortunately, the U.S. Senate is not entirely clueless about the ramifications of this treaty, and 17 Republican senators, led by Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., have introduced a bill to thwart the WHO’s power grab.21

The “No WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty Without Senate Approval Act,”22 introduced February 15, 2023, would require a Senate supermajority (two-thirds or 67 senators) to pass the pandemic treaty.

Additional sponsors of the bill include Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa; Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn.; John Barrasso, R-Wyo.; Mike Lee, R-Utah; Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn.; Rick Scott, R-Fla.; John Hoeven, R-N.D.; Marco Rubio, R-Fla.; Ted Cruz, R-Texas; Steve Daines, R-Mont.; Thom Tillis, R-N.C.; Tom Cotton, R-Ark.; Mike Braun, R-Ind.; Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala.; Roger Marshall, R-Kan.; and Katie Britt, R-Ala.

Congress Must Withdraw US From the WHO

However, according to Boyle,23 an expert on international laws and treaties, even this bill might not be enough to protect us were President Biden to sign the treaty. The reason for this, Boyle explains, is because the treaty is written “specifically to circumvent the Senate-approval process.”

A far more effective strategy, he says, would be for Congress to withhold its annual contributions to the WHO — and then withdraw the U.S. from the WHO altogether. I believe it may be worth supporting all of these strategies. So, please, contact your representatives and urge them to support the No WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty Without Senate Approval Act,” to withhold funding for the WHO and, ultimately, support U.S. withdrawal from the WHO. (Pandemic Treaty Will Usher in Unelected One World Government. Also see (Mainstream Puppets Now Admit Lab Leak Caused Pandemic.)

This very important information.

Unfortunately, however, the United States Congress, as currently constituted, will not withdraw funding from the World Health Organization, and perhaps more to the point, there are not even enough Republicans in the United States Senate who are opposed to this scheme of global totalitarianism given the fact that Senate Minority Leader, Mitchell McConnell (R-Kentucky), Senate Minority Whip John Cornyn (R-Texas) and Senators John Thune (R-South Dakota), Susan Collins (R-Maine), and Willard Mitt Romney (R-Utah by way of Michigan and Massachusetts) are very supportive of the national and global security state. These quislings will never block the World Health Organization’s “global pandemic treaty” as would passively permit the truly villainous, corrupt and demagogic Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., and his administration to implement the treaty without protest.

Sure, write to your representatives and senators if you want to do.

More importantly, however, we must recognize that this is all a chastisement for the sins of a world that has rejected the sweet yoke of Christ the King as it must be exercised by His Catholic Church in all that pertains to the good of souls and for the sins of us all.

The only way out of this mess it through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary, which is why we should pray as many Rosaries each day as our state-in-life permits and to pray the Dolors of Our Lady during this Passiontide, starting today, the Feast of the Seven Dolors of the Blessed Virgin Mary in Passiontide.

A Regime of Death Caused Ideologically Driven Treatment and Immoral and Unsafe “Vaccines”

The unprecedented epidemic of sudden deaths and of myocarditis in people of all ages, including children and teenagers, continues unabated. What is worse is that so few people, even most of the so-called “conservative” talking heads want to discuss this rationally as they and their programs are sponsored by pharmaceutical companies pushing their magic potions to people who have become sick and/or whose existing conditions have been exacerbated by other magic potions prescribed to them by physicians who have been convinced of their “effectiveness” by drug company salesmen and phony peer-reviewed analyses in medical journals.

Yet it is that courageous physicians, scholars, and researchers such as Dr. Peter A. McCullough, Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Joseph Mercola, Dr. Paul Elias Alexander, Dr. Meryl Nass and so many others continue to provide incontestable documentation of the genocide that is taking place before our eyes as those who have succumbed to getting jabbed have developed conditions that may shorten their lifespans and from which they will be suffering until they die, to say nothing of the many thousands upon thousands of people who continue to die suddenly because of those “safe and effective” “vaccines.”

Dr. Robert Malone, who invented the mRNA method of vaccination in 2011, wrote recently that f the mRNA vaccines that have been administered to ninety-two percent of those who have gotten jabbed by one or more of the Wuhan Virus “vaccines” permanently change one’s genetic code:

Approximately 92% of Americans who took a COVID-19 vaccine have mRNA injected into their bodies with absolutely no idea on where it would go, how long would it last, and what price would be paid for having foreign genetic code loaded on lipid nanoparticles in human circulation. Its now known that mRNA is circulatory for at least 28 days and can be found stuck in lymph nodes for at least two months. Both of these may be short estimates. A recent paper by Lalani et al, from Harvard, summarizes the very intensive and expensive US government investment in mRNA technology. Normally pharmaceutical companies front the cost of drug development and then have to win FDA approval and later recover those costs through product sales over the next 20 years. Not the case with mRNA, here NIH BARDA and the DOD DARPA has paid for development using taxpayer dollars to the tune of $31.9B!

The paper does not indicate why mRNA over other technologies nor why the pharmaceutical companies have not picked up the tab. The extensive government involvement implicitly hints at military objectives for the genetic technology. While Lalani falsely claims mRNA COVID-19 vaccines have saved millions of lives, the reality is just the opposite with estimates of US vaccine causalities topping half a million deaths usually within the first few days of taking the shot.

Lalani along with public statements from vaccine companies forecast many mRNA products in American lives for the future still with no understanding of biodistribution, pharmacodynamics, autoimmunity, reverse transcription, and lack of control over antigenic exposure driving fatal side effects.

I have over three decades of drug development experience. I can tell you first hand that without the government crutch, mRNA would have died as a biotechnology long ago. The fundamentals of mRNA-LNP characterization remain incomplete and the companies appear to have no concerns over safety as long as Uncle Sam is picking up the costs and shielding them from liability. (America's Long, Expensive, and Deadly Love Affair with mRNA.)

Additionally, Dr. Peter A. McCullough provided the following documentation about the continued incidences of myocarditis following the jab:

 

Before COVID-19 myocarditis was rare and always alerted cardiologists to future risks of two outcomes: 1) heart failure, 2) arrythmias (ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation) leading to cardiopulmonary arrest. Buchan and colleagues reported 77 Canadian teenagers age 12-17 who needlessly suffered myopericarditis after the Pfizer mRNA vaccine. Sixty six percent occurred after dose #2 and only 7% had prior COVID-19, so the vaccine was to blame in the vast majority of cases. Hospitalization occurred in 44% and their were no deaths. These cases occurred in 2020-2021 and there is no mention of follow-up or risk of future cardiac arrest.

Buchan SA, Alley S, Seo CY, et al. Myocarditis or Pericarditis Events After BNT162b2 Vaccination in Individuals Aged 12 to 17 Years in Ontario, Canada. JAMA Pediatr. Published online February 27, 2023. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.6166

The most common question I receive from concerned and regretful parents is “will my child be OK after getting through myopericarditis?” Buchan and colleagues have the answer in their data and Canadians deserve to know how those 77 kids are doing now two years later.

Ethical research should be responsive to public needs in the setting of a pandemic crisis. The COVID-19 vaccines have caused record injuries, disabilities, and death. Let’s hope medical researchers holding data on vaccine injuries publish longer term outcomes soon so physicians can accurately prognosticate for this now common form of cardiac injury. (Medical Researchers Willfully Blind to Future Risk of Cardiac Arrest after COVID-19 Vaccine Induced Myopericarditis.)

The documentation is clear. However, that documentation means nothing to the high priests and priestesses of the American nomenklatura even as more and more pilots of both private and commercial aircraft continue to become incapacitated or die in flight:

An off-duty pilot flying as a passenger helped take control of a Southwest jet after the captain was “incapacitated” by a medical emergency.

Flight 6013 took off from Las Vegas just after 6:30 a.m. Wednesday when one of its on-duty pilots “needed medical attention” on the way to Columbus, Ohio, Southwest confirmed to The Post.

“A credentialed Pilot from another airline, who was on board, entered the Flight Deck and assisted with radio communication while our Southwest Pilot flew the aircraft,” said airline spokesperson Chris Perry.

“We greatly appreciate their support and assistance.”

A nurse also on the flight then helped take care of the pilot, the airline said, without detailing his condition or what caused the medical emergency.

However, air traffic control audio obtained by CNN showed a member of the flight crew raising the alarm that “the captain became incapacitated while en route. 

“He’s in the back of the aircraft right now with a flight attendant, but we need to get him on an ambulance immediately,” the crew member said.

The Boeing 737 was turned around, landing back in Vegas just before 8 a.m., data on FlightAware.com shows. A backup crew then boarded and took passengers to Columbus as planned, the airline said.

Southwest said it was “standard procedure” to “request assistance from traveling medical personnel during in-flight medical events.”

“This situation just so happened to involve one of our Employees,” the airline said.

The incident is being investigated by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) — which hours later issued separate alerts to airlines, pilots and others about the “need for continued vigilance and attention to mitigation of safety risks” after a series of high-profile near collisions.

Six serious runway incursions have occurred since January that prompted the agency to convene a safety summit last week. 

They include a near miss at JFK Airport in January, and a Southwest jet that recently came within 200 feet of slamming into an ambulance crossing the runway at Baltimore’s airport. (Off-duty pilot helps land jet after captain 'incapacitated'.)

Are they actually trying to cause a major air disaster with these disease-causing, spike-protein bioweapon factories? Seems so to me. One pilot? If pilots are struggling, has the vaccine itself damaged and impacted the thousands of air-traffic controllers in terms of mental function, speed of reactions, and processing and especially in the constant stressed environment if they have silent myocarditis and thus scarred hearts? Are we sitting on a powder keg?

Truth is you have to be weary and scared of flying now. This issue is real for these reckless malfeasants went and got all pilots vaccinated, save a few.

I am warning you, Dr. Hodkinson warns you, Dr. Makis warns you, Dr. McCullough warns you, Dr. Malhotra (now fully against the gene injections, all of these gene shots), Dr. Ramin Oskoui, Dr. Stock etc. warns you that we have to take this seriously and urgently as these pilot cardiac events are routine now. We cannot stay silent. The mRNA technology gene injection must be pulled, must be stopped, there is no benefit and it is deadly.

Key points before you read this substack (Dr. Hodkinson, myself, Jim Torma are debating and will discuss shortly on air):

• All (vast majority of) pilots are vaccinated
• A large # will have undiagnosed ‘silent’ myocarditis
• Myocarditis + the stress of take off and landing creates the possibility of a fatal heart irregularity (arrythmia); the stress/duress causes a flood of catecholamines to be released (adrenaline) and this flooding onto a scarred myocarditis heart with irregular and sub-optimal electrical conduction puts much strain on the heart and can result in cardiac arrest
• Pilots need to be screened for sub-clinical myocarditis with a specialized cardia MRI (Gadolinium MRI) as well as high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) and EKG etc.
• The FAA quietly changed the criteria for an abnormal screening MRI etc. allowing changes that predispose to a cardiac arrythmia
• The airlines, FAA, and pilot unions do NOT want to get involved and will not investigate!
• There is now a push by the airlines to have only ONE pilot per jet!! Either a cost saving measure and/or due to an acute pilot shortage (? Disability/resigning/ fired for not taking the vaxx)
• NO ECGs on Canadian pilots for 2+ years!!
• Delayed issuing of autopsy results on pilots due to slow walking of the medical examiners offices – one Canadian widow has been waiting for over a year to get the full autopsy report
• Total lack of interest in specialized histopathological studies to determine the cause of death in SADS – I could elaborate in lay language
• Emotional pull of a close up interview needed with a widow of a dead pilot
• Multinationals demanding the pilots of their private jets are unvaccinated!
• A significant # of events have already happened

I warn again, 1, 2, 3 planes may fall from the sky before you wake up and stop this? And do something? Must hundreds or thousands die suddenly for you to stop???

Start here:

Virgin Australia Pilot Suffers ‘Heart Attack’ 30 Minutes After Takeoff, Prompting Emergency Landing

A Virgin Australia flight from Adelaide to Perth was forced to make an emergency landing after the First Officer reportedly suffered a heart attack just 30 minutes after departure. The incident occurred on 3rd March and resulted in the Airbus A320 being forced to return to Adelaide, where emergency responders were waiting to transport the sick pilot to the hospital.’

Very few details about the incident have so far been made public by Australia’s aviation accident investigation bureau, but the AV Herald reports that the First Officer became incapacitated after suffering a heart attack.’

Last November, the Captain of an American Eagle flight died from a suspected heart attack shortly after takeoff from Chicago O’Hare, while the Captain of a Biman Bangladesh Airlines flight became incapacitated and later died last August during a flight from Muscat to Dhaka.’

https://www.paddleyourownkanoo.com/2023/03/07/virgin-australia-pilot-suffers-heart-attack-30-minutes-after-takeoff-prompting-emergency-landing/

 

see also these 11 who died (10 plus the pilot) in this crash in Seattle, was it vaccine linked to pilot?

 

He did not faint, he had a heart attack, he died, this is vaccine induced unless it is ruled out e.g. myocarditis or vaccine status.

What we know

‘An American Eagle flight operated by Envoy Air, from Chicago’s O’Hare Airport (ORD), to Columbus, Ohio (CMH), returned to the O’Hare airport on November 20, after the captain passed out and became incapacitated not long after departure. Data shows that the flight was only about 10 minutes from take-off when the situation arose.’

SOURCE:

https://aviationsourcenews.com/airline/american-eagle-pilot-dies-after-fainting-during-departure-from-chicago-ohare/

 

see here:

 

Listen here (double click):

FAA is now investigating after the captain of American Eagle (Envoy) Flight 3556 became incapacitated shortly after taking off from ORD Saturday night. The captain died later at a hospital. The copilot safely landed the plane at ORD. 57 passengers & crew

Envoy did not comment on the cause of the medical emergency. The Air Line Pilots Association, the union which represents Envoy’s pilots, didn’t comment.

A British Airways pilot collapsed and died shortly before he was due to captain a packed jet.

He had been preparing to fly from Cairo in Egypt to Heathrow Airport, but had a heart attack in the crew’s hotel.

The pilot managed to get from his room to the foyer, where colleagues performed CPR on him.

A source told The Sun: “It has rocked BA. It doesn’t bear imagining if he had suffered a heart attack at 30,000ft.”

Airline bosses delayed the scheduled flight the captain was set to fly back to Heathrow airport last week. (British Airways Pilot Collapses And Dies Suddenly Before Flight.)

On July 2, 2016, shortly after Sierra Lund received her pilot’s license, the 17-year-old was piloting a single engine plane when it lost power. Many seasoned flyboys would have found this emergency—requiring extreme calm and grace under pressure and the ability to make skilled, snap judgements—to be testing in the extreme. The procedure requires keeping the nose pitched down (towards the ground) to maintain airspeed (without power) while simultaneously looking for a decent bit of open space on which to land. Young Sierra handled it with textbook aplomb and landed the plane on a golf course fairway, sustaining no injuries and nothing but a damaged prop and front landing gear.

The Daily Mail reported her sangfroid and piloting skills as a triumphant example of a young woman demonstrating great ability, spirit, and potential. “Local police have praised Sierra for staying calm and collected in a situation that could have shaken many seasoned pilots,” the reporter wrote.

Five years later, Sierra was continuing her upward trajectory in life. And then, in September 2021, she yielded to social pressure (and the desire to travel internationally) to receive a COVID-19 “vaccine.”

At this moment, her greatest passions were solo flying and rigorous physical fitness training. Now she can do neither. Eighteen hours after receiving the injection, she developed intense, unrelenting chest pain, and was shortly thereafter diagnosed with myocarditis and pericarditis. As was just reported in the Epoch Times:

As a daughter of a commercial airline pilot who also flies recreationally, aviation has been a constant in her life. Since her diagnosis, Lund still pilots small planes to keep her skills sharp. But she must always have a second pilot accompanying her; she is no longer medically cleared to fly alone.

Lund’s past schedule of daily gym workouts are also in her rear-view mirror—at least for now.

She tries not to think about all that she is missing.

“If I did, I’d probably be depressed,” Lund said. “I’m trying to figure out how to get better and figuring out how to come up with some sort of normal life in the meantime.”

She now runs her own business as an aircraft broker, keeping her in touch with the aviation community that she loves so much.

In between, Lund heads to medical appointments, including some that require travel from her home state, Georgia. She has spent about $15,000 out-of-pocket trying to get well so far.

I found Sierra’s story especially poignant because my younger brother also fell in love with aviation when he was very young and worked hard to become a pilot. Like Ms. Lund, he also enjoys a physically active life (in his case, windsurfing and surfing). The the mere thought of his life wrecked because he was pressured to receive a fraudulent, useless, and dangerous injection is infuriating. Can you imagine how you would feel if you were Sierra’s parents?

For a long time aviation was largely a male domain, which is one reason why Amelia Earhart’s story was the stuff of Hollywood. I suspect that if the spirited and pretty Sierra Lund had been disabled by ANY other commercial product, her story would have been on prime time news and quickly adapted for cinema.

Now, in our COVID-19 “vaccine” trance, no major American newspaper apart from the splendid Epoch Times has reported her story. The small, privately-owned World Tribune newspaper published a brief report, largely quoting the Epoch Times piece. A Google search for “Sierra Lund pilot” yields many reports of her heroic piloting in 2016, but almost nothing about her life catastrophically affected by the infernal COVID-19 injection in 2021.

Our so-called government and society will some day wake up from its trance and be horrified by what it has done to young people like Sierra Lund. Shame on the public health agencies, politicians, and doctors who have perpetrated this terrible crime. (Young Pilot's Heart Damaged Right After Vax.)

Fly the friendly skies, anyone?

The situation of sudden deaths and injuries has become so widespread that stories such as one about a Utah State University football player collapsing from a cardiac arrest during a spring practice session can be published with the knowledge that very few people, relatively speaking, will bother to take notice of anything out of the ordinary:

A Utah State football player is recovering in the hospital after suffering “non-traumatic sudden cardiac arrest” during a spring practice session Thursday, the university announced Friday. 

Josh Davis, a redshirt freshman wideout from California, collapsed on the field and was taken to Logan Regional Hospital before later being transported to McKay-Dee Hospital. 

He was said to be in critical condition but was upgraded to fair condition the following morning. According to the school, he was “taken off life-sustaining medical devices and is breathing on his own.”

“Davis received initial critical treatment and was stabilized at Logan Regional Hospital before being transported to McKay-Dee Hospital, where their critical care team continued treatment with therapeutic hypothermia to lower the body temperature to preserve his neurological function,” the school said in a press release. 

The university later posted a photo of Davis in the hospital surrounded by his family as he gave a “thumbs up.”  (Utah State football player hospitalized after suffering cardiac arrest.)

Occasionally, however, there are families who understand what has happened, which is why a family in the People’s Republic of Canada, which is ruled at this time by Chairman Xi Trudeau Jinping, is suing the AstraZeneca because their son suffered a stroke after he received that pharmaceutical company’s “vaccine”:

A Manitoba family is suing AstraZeneca Canada, alleging their son had a stroke following his COVID-19 vaccination that has left him unable to work or care for himself. Jackson Troy Reimer, now 23, was “in excellent health” before getting vaccinated while working at the Whistler Blackcomb ski resort in British Columbia in 2021, according to a statement of claim filed in Manitoba’s Court of King’s Bench on March 16.

But six days after getting his shot, he started feeling dizzy, losing his vision and having severe headaches. A CT scan at Vancouver General Hospital found Reimer had a hemorrhagic stroke, the lawsuit says.

He later needed two platelet infusions, then underwent a craniotomy to stop bleeding in his brain and had to be intubated after becoming unresponsive — all outcomes Reimer and his parents, Marina Dawn Toews Reimer and Perry John Reimer, believe were caused by the vaccine.

Since March 2021, Reimer has been unable to hold gainful employment, advance his university education or carry out many activities of daily living, the court filing says. He’s now legally blind and has other symptoms related to mental focus and concentration, memory loss, mental impairment and obsessive-compulsive disorder tendencies, according to the claim. (Manitoba Family Suing AstraZeneca After Son's Stroke Following COVID Vaccination.)

A mother here in the United States of America is suing a physician in Washington, District of Columbia, who gave a mRNA jab to her two children without her permission”:

The mother of two children who were given COVID-19 vaccines without the mother’s consent is suing the doctor who administered the vaccines.

An attorney representing NaTonya McNeil last week filed a lawsuit in Superior Court for the District of Columbia against Janine A. Rethy, M.D., M.P.H.

According to the complaint, on Sept. 2, 2022, McNeil took her two older children, ages 15 and 17, to the KIDS Mobile Medical Clinic/Ronald McDonald Care Mobile clinic, operated by Georgetown Hospital, to complete their required annual physical exam for the 2022-2023 school year.

The lawsuit alleges Rethy, director of the mobile clinic, held the children in the examination room longer than necessary for a regular check-up and vaccinated them against COVID-19 over their objections and without consulting their mother

In order to attempt to obtain the children’s consent — which they are not legally able to provide without a parent or guardian — the doctor falsely informed the children the COVID-19 vaccine was mandatory for school attendance and told them they could not lawfully decline it if they wanted to attend school.

The suit, filed by D.C. attorney Matthew Hardin, seeks damages for false imprisonment, battery and fraud.

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) is financing the lawsuit because, according to CHD President and General Counsel Mary Holland, “CHD couldn’t just sit still and not allow this wrong to go unpunished and not bring this to the public’s attention.”

In an exclusive conversation with The Defender, McNeil explained why she is suing the the doctor:

“I just feel like people shouldn’t be able to do whatever they want to do to other people and especially not to children. As a mother, I feel like, ‘You all just took all my rights away from me to do what you wanted to do to my kids.’

“I do want justice to be done in this case. I feel like something needs to be done. This can’t just continue to happen.”

‘I feel violated’

According to the complaint, Rethy’s stated goal is to vaccinate all children against COVID-19. The complaint quotes her statement to the press:

“Our goal is to increase vaccination rates in children here in D.C. … For more than 30 years our role has been to be in the community to help address the problem of health disparities, bringing families care where they are.

“For this particular effort, we are glad to be partnering with DC Health to provide both regular childhood vaccines and COVID-19 vaccines to all children.”

In addition to her role as director of the mobile clinic, Rethy is chief of MedStar Georgetown University Hospital’s Division of Community Pediatrics and assistant professor of pediatrics at Georgetown University School of Medicine.

McNeil said that when she took her older children to the clinic, she stayed outside the examination room to care for her infant. As soon as the children entered the doctor’s office, she called her daughter’s cellphone to let Rethy know she was just outside the door if the doctor needed to consult her for anything.

According to McNeil, the doctor did not ask or inform her about any vaccinations, and did not ask her to sign anything. At the end of the physical, Rethy came out to talk to her.

McNeil said the doctor explained her son’s asthma treatment plan, but that’s all they discussed.

As they were heading home, McNeil said she was shocked when her daughter complained that her arm hurt “pretty bad.” When McNeil asked her why it hurt, her daughter said she was given the COVID-19 shot, even though she told the doctor she didn’t want it.

When McNeil asked her why she allowed the doctor to administer the shot, her daughter said:

“When she had the needle in her hand and she was coming towards me, I backed up and I asked her what is that needle, and she said it was the COVID shot and I … told her I didn’t want it and she said, ‘Well it is mandatory, you have to get it in order to go to school.’”

Rethy allegedly administered the shot to her daughter, and then to her son. McNeil said:

“He’s 14 and he said they didn’t even ask him if he wanted it or not, but when they gave it to him, he said he thought he had to get it because his sister got it.”

According to the complaint, both children received the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, authorized for emergency use, and the meningococcal vaccine. Her son was also injected with TDaP.

Both children were upset and angry they had been coerced into vaccination, the complaint says.

No school mandate, despite what clinic and doctor alleged

When she got home, McNeil said she called the doctor’s office, and asked them why they vaccinated her children without her consent.

“I would have never consented to you all vaccinating my children,” she said. “I’m not vaccinated and I’m not getting vaccinated and my kids were never supposed to be vaccinated for COVID period, under no circumstances.”

She said the person on the phone said they were supposed to get them for school.

After hanging up, McNeil said she was “so irritated I even started crying” because she couldn’t believe “they put this poison” into her children’s bodies.

In July 2022, D.C. public schools imposed a vaccine mandate for schoolchildren ages 12 and up for the 2022-2023 school year. But on Aug. 26, just weeks after imposing the mandate, officials walked it back, postponing it until 2023.

That means when McNeil’s children saw the doctor, there was no school vaccine mandate in place, despite what the Rethy allegedly told the children.

The age of consent

The District of Columbia in March 2021 enacted the D.C. Minor Consent for Vaccination Amendment Act of 2020 (D.C. Minor Consent Act), allowing children 11 and older to consent to the administration of any vaccine — including COVID-19 shots — recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) — without parental knowledge or consent if the medical provider believed “the minor is capable of meeting the informed consent standard.”

The law also required healthcare personnel to provide accurate immunization records to the Department of Health and to the student’s school, but not to parents with religious exemptions.

CHD and Parental Rights Foundation filed a lawsuit seeking a court order to declare the D.C. Act unconstitutional.

A judge for the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on March 18, 2022, granted a preliminary injunction prohibiting the D.C. mayor, Department of Health and public schools from enforcing the law.

That means at the time McNeil’s children visited the clinic, they could not legally provide consent to be vaccinated without their mother’s consent.

McNeil said:

“To do that to my little children, my innocent children. They took her rights. When she backed away from you [the doctor] and said she didn’t want it, that should have been the end of it.

“Or you [the doctor] should have called me on the phone to find out what I feel about the situation. But you [the doctor] basically told my child a lie so you [she] could do what you [she] wanted to do to my kid.” (Exclusive: Mother Sues D.C. Doctor Who Gave Kids COVID Vaccines Without Consent. By the way, I commend attorney Matthew D. Hardin, whom we knew from our days at Saint Gertrude the Great Church in West Chester, Ohio, when he was around seventeen years old in 2007 for his valiant efforts in this regard. Good work, Mr. Hardin!)

“Parental rights”?

Not in the “woke” world of “diversity, equity, and inclusion” that is actually a world of conformity, iniquity, and exclusion.” It should be pointed out, however, that it is a relatively short step from indoctrinating children in all things impure by means of classroom instruction in matters pertaining to the Sixth and Ninth Commandments and taking them without providing any parental notification to get contraceptives, kill their babies or undergo surgical mutilation to surreptitiously “vaccinate” children against their own will and without notifying their parents. Truly diabolical, especially when one considers that the Wuhan Virus was almost entirely non-lethal if contracted by children and teenagers, something that even the phony-baloney World Health Organization is now admitting in a kind of an oblique, left-handed manner:

Yet another leading health institution has unveiled a significant Covid policy reversal this week… this time it’s none other than the World Health Organization (WHO) saying something that might have gotten an individual suspended from social media or publicly “canceled” a mere one or two years ago:

WHO now recommends healthy, young people NOT get the Covid Vaccines.

The revision in guidelines was put out this week by the WHO’s Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (SAGE) – a group of scientists and officials which said they no longer recommend the Covid vaccine for “healthy” children ages 6 months to 17 years.

“The public health impact of vaccinating healthy children and adolescents is comparatively much lower than the established benefits of traditional essential vaccines for children – such as the rotavirus, measles, and pneumococcal conjugate vaccines,” SAGE wrote.

The new policy identifies three priority groups — high, medium and low — and puts children and teens in the low category. The definitions assess categories for “risk of severe disease and death”. The WHO still recommends that “Children who have compromised immune systems or existing health conditions should still get the vaccine.”

SAGE Chair Dr. Hanna Nohyn stated in explaining the updated guidelines, “Updated to reflect that much of the population is either vaccinated or previously infected with COVID-19, or both, the revised roadmap reemphasizes the importance of vaccinating those still at-risk of severe disease, mostly older adults and those with underlying conditions, including with additional boosters.”

The United States CDC currently recommends Covid vaccines for children 6 months and up…

It’s unclear whether the US Center of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) will follow in adapting its recommendations to this revised WHO policy, but what is clear is that those parents who remained skeptical of putting hastily developed “Authorized for Emergency Use” mRNA vaccines into their children have been clearly vindicated… and this time by no less than the WHO. (WHO Now Says Covid Vaccines Not Recommended For Healthy Kids & Teens.)

Too bad for all the young children (my late father, who hated slang—as I do, used to say, “Goats have kids, human beings have children) and teenagers who have been killed or injured by the “emergency use vaccines” to ward off the effects of the SARS-Cov-2 virus. (Please see Appendix A for a list of young people in Europe who have died because of the poisoned jabs.)

Nevertheless, however, people continue to be subjected to rank totalitarianism while even the so-called “experts” at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, are “scared to death” to report vaccine injuries as such even when they are convinced of the facts:

Doris Bryson, a legal assistant from St. Simons Island, Georgia, was looking forward to her upcoming retirement and the opportunity to travel the country.

Bryson worked full-time, walked two miles during her lunch breaks, cared for her three dogs and enjoyed yard work and gardening — that is, until Jan. 20, 2021, when she received the first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine primary series.

“Now, my hands can’t type,” Bryson, now 71, told The Defender. “I had to quit. That was a big thing. I like working in the yard and I can’t do that because of my hands and my balance.”

Bryson and her husband, Larry, recounted their experience in an exclusive interview with The Defender. They provided extensive documentation to corroborate their story.

Mayo Clinic doctors ‘scared to death’ to attribute symptoms to vaccine injury

Iris began to feel ill immediately after getting the first dose of the vaccine.

“I felt a little nauseous,” said Iris, who got the shot on a Wednesday morning. “Friday, I woke up with a sharp pain between my shoulder and legs, but it went away … Later that morning, I was getting ready to go to work. I had eaten breakfast, and I got nauseous and lost my breakfast, and I decided I’d stay home.”

She said she “crashed on the couch” and anytime she got up, she felt off balance and “couldn’t control my legs, mainly the right side.”

As her symptoms grew worse, she called her neighbor, a nurse practitioner, who said, “It sounds like a stroke, you need to get to the hospital.”

Iris spent a week in the hospital, where doctors administered intravenous fluids and performed a lumbar, or spinal tap. She was examined by a neurologist, Dr. Lori A. Trefts, of the Southeast Georgia Health System.

“Initially, Dr. Trefts diagnosed it as a spinal stroke,” Larry said. “But then two days later, she came back and said ‘no, we’ve got complete results now from all the tests, and it’s not a spinal stroke, it’s transverse myelitis brought on by the COVID shot.’”

Trefts maintains to this day that the COVID-19 vaccine caused the transverse myelitis, Larry said.

Larry described Iris’ symptoms:

“Simple tasks that she once handled with ease are now impossible. She cannot hold or carry anything and walk simultaneously, opening bottles, cans, boxes, preparing meals, feeding, walking and bathing her pets, personal hygiene, bathing herself, driving, socializing, intimacy, in addition to her gardening.

“Her favorite hobby was crocheting and needlework from her youth. Life as we knew it has certainly vanished.”

After being discharged from the hospital, Iris visited the Mayo Clinic’s Florida campus in Jacksonville, in hopes of receiving further treatment. But “they were useless,” she said.

“I had done some internet research and found a doctor down there [whose] bio said he had done research on transverse myelitis,” said Larry. “But when we actually got there and spent time with him, he was upfront and honest with us and said ‘well, you know, I did some in school, a little bit, but I’m not a specialist and I’m not involved in any studies. I’ve seen some reports, but I haven’t read them.’”

Larry added:

“Doctors at Mayo, in all honesty, we felt like they were scared to death to say that the shot might have caused this … we just felt that they were holding back from saying what this really was.

“Apparently, there’s not a lot of treatment for transverse myelitis, and what treatment there is, Iris had that while she was in the hospital, which is steroid IV [intravenous] treatment. We’re trying to do what we can to figure out what might be beneficial for her recovery.”

Iris hasn’t received any treatment since her initial hospital stay. “Apparently, they’re a little concerned about that high dose of steroids for any length of time,” Larry said.

Stem cell therapy administered by a local chiropractor appears to have provided Iris with a degree of improvement, she said:

“I saw an article in the paper about the chiropractor and stem cell freezer, so I started going to her and I have had some stem cell shots. The last one that I received may have helped, but I still can’t use my hands much.

“It has helped for what movement I do have in my hands, and they also gave me shots in my right leg, and that has helped give me more balance.”

Despite these improvements, Iris still struggles. As she tires, especially on physical therapy days, “she strains to speak,” Larry said. “The transverse myelitis has impacted her speech.”

Iris is fortunate to not be experiencing pain. “Everywhere we’ve been, they’ve asked me about pain,” Iris said. “I’ve not had any pain, so I feel fortunate with that. Just a muscle in my right leg sometimes … feels tight, but it’s nothing I can’t handle. That’s about the only uncomfortable feeling I have.”

“I think [Iris] is somewhat blessed in that she actually lost sensation,” Larry said. “She has no feeling in her back. She’s had spinal taps and didn’t feel it … so there’s certain areas of her body that there’s just no sensation.”

‘We feel like we’re just left out here alone’

Although doctors at the Mayo Clinic were reluctant to attribute Iris’ symptoms to injuries from the COVID-19 vaccine, her neurologist has been much more willing to make that connection — and go public with it.

Along with Dr. Patrick McLean, Trefts authored a journal article, “Transverse myelitis 48 hours after the administration of an mRNA COVID 19 vaccine,” published in 2021, in Neuroimmunology Reports.

Iris’ local newspaper, The Brunswick News, also published an article about her vaccine injuries and her post-vaccination experience. However, Iris said nobody else from the media or the scientific community has reached out to her.

The silence also extends to government agencies.

On March 23, 2021, Iris submitted a claim to the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program. This is the government body, under the aegis of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), where COVID-19 vaccine injury victims can submit their claims.

However, according to Larry, after a March 18, 2022, reply from HHS stating the initial application contained “insufficient information” and the subsequent provision of the requested documentation, “We have heard nothing from anyone … literally no one has contacted us at all.”

He added:

“We feel like we’re just left out here alone to handle this on a daily basis. We are feeling alone in this battle, as the government agencies and organizations set up to assist are non-responsive. It’s as if they continue to ignore us, we will go away.”

He said they’re “blessed” that they’ve been able to handle the financial fallout from the injury — now “well in excess of $100,000 out of pocket, about $150,000 right now,” Larry said.

“We can manage that. We took it out of our savings. But there are people out there who can’t, and they’re getting no assistance, no response at all.”

‘We just keep struggling forward’

Iris’ injuries have put the couple’s retirement plans on hold.

“[Iris] was very active for a 69-year-old,” Larry said. “We both still worked. Our goal was to retire at 70 … and visit as many of the 50 states as possible in our remaining healthy years. We bought a fifth-wheel travel trailer. We were going to hit the road and do some traveling.”

He said he hopes Iris will be mobile enough someday to travel, as planned.

Iris told The Defender that when she first came home from the hospital, she was confined to a wheelchair. After receiving physical therapy at home, “They got me on, I call it a ‘rollator’ — a walker with wheels.”

After beginning stem cell therapy, however, she has been able to perform a degree of movement without this device, instead using a cane.

“I just don’t feel secure enough outside to wander and wobble around without something to help me,” Iris said. “I do get out a little bit and try to do something in the yard, but it’s just out. I don’t accomplish anything.”

Larry called it a “drastic reduction of her quality of life.”

He added:

“We’ve got pets and she used to take care of them and now that’s my job … Things that she used to do, like going out and shopping on her own, she can no longer do. She’s so limited because of the lack of use of her hands. Even taking a bath and dressing is difficult … but we just keep struggling forward.”

The Brysons have received support from friends and from the members of their church.

“Friends, of course, have been very supportive, want to help, and our church family as well,” Larry said. “So I’ve gained probably 20 pounds from way too much food. But they’ve been real good and still inquire about Iris’ health and how she’s doing.”

Iris had some words of advice for vaccine injury victims in similar situations to her own:

“You just have to take the next step, whenever that is, yourself. Medical people are not going to help you. I know a lot of people don’t like chiropractors, but this lady was willing to try, and she has helped me a lot, and she wants me to get off the cane.

“So, they just need to keep working at it. And if you go into therapy, don’t just go to therapy and go home and sit down. You have to do some at home on your own. You just can’t wait for somebody else to do it for you.”  (Exclusive: Neurologist Says Pfizer Shot Caused Woman’s Transverse Myelitis.)

As I have noted in previous parts of this three year-old series of commentaries, “therapy” is not going to help anyone. People who are suffering from any disease and/or who have been the victims of true injustices in the natural order of things must learn about the theology of redemptive suffering and thence to beg Our Lady to send them the graces to carry their crosses with love, joy, and gratitude as redeemed creatures who hope to do reparation for their own sins and for those of the whole world as they offer up all whatever merit they might earn by doing so  to the Throne of Most Blessed Trinity as the consecrated slaves of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary.

That most people do not realize this is truly diabolical, but one must keep in mind that the adversary has been able to attack the supernatural life of the soul much more easily following the Protestant Revolution’s overthrow of the Social Reign of Christ the King and the subsequent rise of the welter of Judeo-Masonic naturalistic “philosophies” and ideologies that have arisen its sorry wake. A thinly disguised totalitarianism has “evolved” quite naturally out of the lie of Western liberal, pluralistic “democracy,” and there is no getting this “genie” back in the bottle anytime soon, especially since the system of death (contraception, abortion, “brain death”/vital organ vivisection, the starvation and dehydration of innocent human beings who are said to be brain-damaged, euthanasia, suicide, assisted suicide, physician-assisted suicide, “quality of life”/”comfort care”/palliative care/hospice, vaccines) is so embedded into every precinct of the American deathcare system that government agencies punish those who tell the truth about vaccine injuries while promoting those who suppress the facts:

‘Dr. Theresa Long, a medical officer with the United States military, has testified in court that she was ordered by a superior to suppress Covid-19 vaccine injuries following the Biden regime’s mandate.

The DoD downplayed Dr. Long’s conclusions, saying the increase in vaccine injuries was caused by a “glitch in the database.”

On March 10, Liberty Counsel, the law firm representing thirty members of the military who are fighting the military vaccine mandate, returned to federal court to defend the preliminary injunction Judge Steven Merryday granted two military plaintiffs that allowed them to skirt the military vaccine mandate.

The Department of Defense (DoD) asked the judge to set aside the injunction while the case was on appeal.

Judge Merryday is a United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida.

Per DailyExpose: During the all-day hearing, Liberty Counsel presented compelling testimony from the Navy Commander of a surface warship and three military flight surgeons, Lt. Col. Peter Chambers, Lt. Col. Teresa Long and Col. (Ret.) Stewart Tankersley, M.D. In contrast, the DOD declined to present witnesses.

Founder and Chairman of Liberty Counsel Mat Staver said in an interview with the Blaze’s Daniel Horowitz on Monday that there have been three hearings now in this case, and the DoD has not yet offered a single witness. Instead of witnesses, the government “sends these declarations,” Staver explained. He said the judge has urged them to bring live witnesses to court so they can be cross examined, but they just refuse to do it. “So they send these declarations that some JAG attorney writes, and somebody in the military signs off on them.”

Staver said that the information the DoD has been presenting in court is “outdated, wrong, and would really be subject to dismantling under cross examination.” He added that cross examinations of his witnesses have only made their case stronger. “So they really don’t have anything to cross examine our witnesses with,” he said.

Staver told Horowitz that Judge Merryday has chastised the DoD lawyers during the hearings, telling them they have “a frail case,” and are “acting as though they are above the law.”

Dr. Theresa Long, a flight surgeon who holds a master’s degree in Public Health and is specially trained in the DMED, gave emotional testimony on March 10.

She and two other flight surgeons reviewed DMED last year and made some stunning discoveries about the high incidence of apparent vaccine injuries among members of the military.

According to the whistleblowers, certain disorders spiked after the vaccine mandate went into effect, including miscarriages and cancers, and neurological problems which increased by 1000 percent.

Dr. Long testified that she was contacted by high level officer the night before the hearing, and told not to discuss her findings regarding the explosive military medical data in court. The whistleblower reportedly said she felt threatened after she tried to get her superiors to address the findings, “fearing for her life and for the safety of her children.”

Since the whistleblowers came forward with the DMED data, the DoD has thrown cold water on their conclusions, saying the increase in vaccine injuries was caused by a “glitch in the database.”

Politifact contacted Peter Graves, spokesperson for the Defense Health Agency’s Armed Forces Surveillance Division, who said the data for 2021 is correct, but for some reason, the data for the five years prior was inaccurate. Graves told PolitiFact by email that the division reviewed data in the DMED “and found that the data was incorrect for the years 2016-2020.”

In other words, for five straight years, the data was seriously corrupted and none of the DoD’s data analysts figured this out, and then it fixed itself on its own in 2021. The DoD has since put out new numbers showing more illnesses among the troops for the years prior to 2021.

Staver asked Long a question about the DMED data during the hearing, and she answered: “I have been ordered not to answer that question.”

Judge Merryday reportedly asked Long: “Ordered by who?,” and the doctor explained what happened the night before the hearing.

Staver then asked Long if the information the military ordered her to withhold was relevant and helpful for the court and the public to know. She said, “yes,” and Staver asked her why.

Long reportedly paused and choked back tears as she told the judge: “I have so many soldiers being destroyed by this vaccine. Not a single member of my senior command has discussed my concerns with me … I have nothing to gain and everything to lose by talking about it. I’m OK with that because I am watching people get absolutely destroyed.”

Dr. Long also testified that the data shows that deaths of military members from the vaccines exceed deaths from COVID itself.

Staver later told Horowitz that the DoD’s order for her not to discuss DMED amounted to witness tampering, especially since Long has whistleblower protections.

“They not only violated the Whistleblower Act, they potentially intimidated a witness and tried to change that witness’ testimony,” he said during the Conservative Review podcast on Monday.

The doctor said she is constantly contacted by people who have been injured by the genetic vaccines, and that many of those injured are pilots, who are expected to meet high fitness standards. Long told Staver that in just one afternoon she heard from four pilots who had just gotten MRIs back showing that they had myocarditis.

Morale is tanking in the military, she testified, with soldiers are in despair over the pressure to get the vaccine, and some are even having suicidal thoughts.

Long said she was aware of at least two people who have committed suicide over the pressure, and the threat of punishment for refusal.

She said the current regime’s policies are undermining “good order and discipline.”

In addition to Dr. Long, an unnamed Navy commander testified about his commander’s attempts to punish him for refusing the experimental injections.

On February 2, Judge Merryday issued a temporary restraining order blocking the Navy from punishing the Commander because of his vaccination status. Judge Merryday ruled the Navy violated the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA).

When the court ordered the Commodore to comply with the law, he filed an affidavit saying he had “lost confidence” in the Commander because the Commander had not taken the COVID shots.

The judge then entered a preliminary injunction, and the DOD and the Navy filed a motion asking the court to set aside his injunction, arguing that due to their “lost confidence” in the commander, his ship could not deploy.

However, at the time the ship was allegedly unable to be deployed, the commander was actually far out to sea testing the ship and training the crew.

While many Commanders fail to complete these operations timely, the Commander completed the mission early and the ship deemed “safe and ready.”

In a dramatic moment, the Commander said he should not have to be there in court defending religious freedom. “Generals and admirals should be here saying what I am saying today to uphold religious freedom. Our religious freedoms are being attacked.”

Also testifying last week was Dr. Pete Chambers, a Purple Heart recipient who is in the Texas National Guard defending the southern border where 10,000-20,000 illegal immigrants are flooding through every week. “My job is to keep our soldiers safe,” Chambers said.

Chambers was hoping to retire from the military in 2023 after nearly 40 years of service, but his adverse reaction to the Moderna shot derailed his plans.

Trusting the military that the shots are “safe and effective,” and not knowing at the time that aborted fetal cells were used in the testing and/or development, he took the shot. He now suffers from demyelination, a condition affecting the central nervous system caused by the injection.

After his Moderna injury, Dr. Chambers met Lt. Col. Long. They reviewed the DOD’s Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED), the military equivalent to the federal government’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), where he discovered other military members also developed a demyelination disease after the COVID shots.

Chambers, a military flight surgeon and one of only six Green Beret surgeons, was told that his job was to get soldiers to vaccinated. His superiors told him that religious exemptions would be automatically denied. “Soldiers will try. Soldiers will fail,” this commanders said.

He pointed out that shots are not effective in preventing infection, and estimated that about 75-80% of soldiers getting infected are “double vaxxed” compared to only about 15% of soldiers who are not vaccinated.

Like Long, Chambers also testified that many soldiers are being injured by the COVID shots, and that “this is not normal.”

Dr. Stewart Tankersley, a flight surgeon who retired in September 2021 at the rank of Colonel, testified that the injections are neither safe nor effective.

Tankersley said he has personally treated over 200 COVID patients with no fatalities, and the group of doctors with whom he is associated has treated over 18,000 COVID patients with deaths only in the single digits.

“I’ve never seen anything like this in the military or civilian world, the lack of dialogue, the suppression of scientific dialogue.” Tankersley said on the stand.

Dr. Tankersley explained one of several reasons there are so many injuries from the COVID shots. The mRNA vaccines require a Lipid Nanoparticle (LNP) as a delivery mechanism because the RNA quickly degrades without being encased in the LNP. The combination bypasses the natural immune system and creates inflammation that can inhibit the body’s innate immunity.

Dr. Tankersley testified that the shots are neither safe nor effective. He also testified that there are safe and effective treatments for COVID, including nasal rinsing and ivermectin.

Liberty Counsel argued that the DOD’s position that the only one way to combat COVID and ensure military readiness is to force the injections and kick out the unvaccinated is “untenable,” and that the mandate is undermining military readiness and harming morale.

Staver said: “I am honored to serve the brave men and women of the military. I am dismayed by the abuse and propaganda forced upon them from the White House and the Department of Defense. The truth will prevail, and freedom will win.” (US Military Doctor Testifies She Was Ordered by the Biden administration to 'Cover Up' Vaccine Injuries,)

No, the American concept of “freedom” will not win as it is precisely what has resulted in the descent of totalitarianism upon us at this time.

However, Truth Himself—Truth Incarnate, Truth Crucified, Truth Resurrected—will win in the end as all the schemes of those suppressing both supernatural and natural truth at this time will be revealed at the General Judgment of the living and dead on the Last Day. There will be no place to hide at that time. The just will rejoice in triumph while the unjust will seek in vain to flee from the condemnation that their serial acts of playing God deserve in the objective order of things.

Unlike the situation here in the United States of America and in the European where the law indemnifies the developers and manufactures of the poisons sold as “vaccines,” the government of the Republic of China, which is, after all, the legitimate government all Chinese people as it was overthrown by the illegitimate butchers of the Chinese Communist Party in 1949, has paid out over five million dollars to those injured by the “vaccines” administered to fight the mostly non-lethal Wuhan Virus:

The Taipei Times reports that the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) committee recently decided to award compensation to the family of a girl aged “five to 11, who died of fulminant myocarditis after receiving her second shot of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.”

The deputy Director-General of the Taiwan Centers for Disease Control (CDC), Philip Lo, said the girl fell unconscious three days after she received the second shot and that a cardiac ultrasound scan “showed preserved systolic function, suggesting fulminant myocarditis,” according to the Taipei Times.

Even though Lo said that viral infection is the most common cause for the lymphocytic infiltration found within the girl’s myocardial fibers, the committee could not rule out that the fulminant myocarditis was associated with the Covid injection when “considering the sequence of events.” The CDC official also took into account that “the risk of myocarditis after a second shot is higher than the first shot of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine.”

In addition to the NT$ 3.5 million, the committee also agreed to pay out NT$ 300,000 (9,766 USD) for funeral costs.

During the latest meeting of the VICP committee, 10 out of 118 cases reviewed were awarded financial compensation, “including one case of adverse reaction after receiving a Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccine and nine cases of adverse reactions after a COVID-19 vaccine,” according to the Taipei Times.

This is not the first time that the VICP has paid out compensations to people who died after receiving a COVID injection. In June 2022 the committee granted compensation payments in 10 cases of suspected COVID shot injuries. The family of a person “who died of intracerebral hemorrhage after receiving a dose of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine” received a payment of NT$ 3.5 million (113,932 USD) from the Taiwanese government. (Taiwan gov't vaccine injury program pays family of girl who died of myocarditis after COVID jab.)

In the United States of America, however, the so-called Centers for Disease Control (CDC) have worked overtime and hand-in-hand with Pfizer to suppress the truth about the link between the Pfizer jab and myocarditis:

CDC undercounted myocarditis cases in 2021

Documents provided by the CDC in response to an Oct. 12, 2022 FOIA request submitted by CHD reveal the agency provided an undercounted number of recorded myocarditis cases following COVID-19 vaccination to the Israeli Ministry of Health.

The FOIA request asked the CDC to “provide all emails sent by any of the relevant individuals or received by any of the relevant individuals (whether directly or via cc or bcc) containing the search word ‘myocarditis’” between Oct. 1, 2020 and April 30, 2021.

“There has been considerable public discussion of and controversy about how to weigh

the risk of myocarditis that is associated with COVID-19 vaccines,” the request stated. “The public has a significant interest in having a full understanding of how U.S. public health agencies have addressed this issue.”

Following a response by the CDC, CHD on Nov. 17, 2022, narrowed down its request to include only documentation containing the term “myocarditis” within 25 words of “(covid or report* or child* or adolescent* or young*or teen* or male or fatal* or death* or die* or serious or severe or hospital*).”

The heavily redacted 985-page tranche of documents provided to CHD included a Feb. 28, 2021 request, on page 692, from Israel’s Ministry of Health. The request, logged on that date by CDC’s internal task tracking system, stated:

“We are seeing a large number of myocarditis and pericarditis cases in young individuals soon after Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. We would like to discuss the issue with a relevant expert at CDC.”

A CDC email, dated March 10, 2021, and found on pages 710-714 of the document, read:

“They are investigating a safety signal of myocarditis/myopericarditis in a younger population (16-30 years old) following administration of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.

“The Ministry of Health stated they received reports of around 40 cases of this adverse event.”

In the March 10, 2021 response, page 861, sent by the CDC to the Israeli Ministry of Health stated:

“A search of the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) conducted on February 23, 2021 revealed 27 cases (6 cases of myocarditis, 7 cases of myopericarditis, 14 cases pericarditis).

“Twelve cases occurred after dose 1, 7 cases after dose 2, and the dose was not reported for 8 cases. Four patients had comorbid conditions that could suggest alternate etiologies for the adverse event.

“During this analysis period the reporting rate of myopericarditis following administration of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines was low and estimated to be 0.7 per million doses of vaccine administered.

“However, the limitations of passive surveillance such as under-reporting, lack of a control group, missing and incomplete data make it challenging to assess causation.

“Thus, FDA has not made a final determination regarding the causality between myopericarditis and the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.”

However, up to Feb. 23, 2021, VAERS had actually received 36 reports of myocarditis — although at that time, the database was significantly backlogged.

It is unclear why data from a Feb. 23, 2021 search was provided by the CDC, when the request from Israel’s Ministry of Health was submitted on Feb. 28, 2021. There is no indication that there was contact from the Israeli health ministry with the CDC regarding this issue prior to Feb. 28, 2021.

While reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed, the system has been shown to report only 1% of actual vaccine adverse events.

Studies have found further deficiencies in the VAERS system, including deleted or missing reports, the delayed entry of reports and the “recoding of Medical

Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) terms from severe to mild.”

Out of the deleted or missing reports, 13% pertained to deaths and 63% represented severe adverse events.

VAERS data is publicly accessible on the internet and presumably would already have been available to the Israeli Health Ministry as a result, therefore it is unclear why the CDC appears to have relied on this data in its response to Israel.

Moreover, by March 10, 2021, the presumed date of the CDC response to the Israeli Health Ministry, 14 more cases of myocarditis were reported to VAERS, for a total of 49 such cases identified in the database.

Of the 36 myocarditis cases reported to VAERS by Feb. 23, 2021, 25 were in males, 21 involved the Moderna vaccine (15 males), and 15 involved the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine (10 males).

And of the 49 cases recorded by March 10, 2021, 35 were in males, 26 involved the Moderna vaccine (20 males) and 23 involved the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine (15 males).

The average age of the patients was 33.6 and median age was 31.5 — with the average age of male cases being 31.1 (median 28) and the average age of females 40.8 (median 36.5), indicating a higher incidence in younger males.

The average number of days before onset and diagnosis following vaccination was 5.4, with a median of 3 days.

With hundreds of pages’ worth of redactions, it is unclear if there are more documents or data that would provide further insights into the response provided by the agency to Israel’s Ministry of Health.

In its Feb. 24 response, the CDC claims the redacted documents are protected by statute, confidentiality laws or privacy laws.

Notably, on the same day as the Israel Ministry of Health’s request to the CDC, Pfizer published a document — released as part of last year’s “Pfizer Documents” release from the FDA — titled “Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports of PF-07302048 (BNT162B2) received through 28-Feb-2021.”

BNT162B2 refers to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine that received Emergency Use Authorization from the FDA.

This document indicated that 25 cases of myocarditis were reported by Feb. 28, 2021 as part of a list of “adverse events of special interest” (AESI).

This figure drew from several databases, including the Brighton Collaboration (SPEAC), the EU’s ACCESS protocol, U.S. CDC (preliminary list of AESI for VAERS surveillance) and the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency.

Studies show COVID shots lead to increased risks of myocarditis

Several recent studies have shown an increased prevalence of myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination.

“Delayed Vigilance: A Comment on Myocarditis in Association with the COVID-19 Injections,” by Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D. and Brian Hooker, Ph.D., P.E., published Oct. 17, 2022 in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research, found that two months after COVID-19 vaccines were rolled out to the public, a statistically significant safety signal for myocarditis in males ages 8 to 21 appeared in VAERS.

However, as previously reported by The Defender, even though this safety signal was visible as early as Feb. 19, 2021, CDC officials waited until May 27, 2021 before alerting the public.

By then, over 50% of the eligible U.S. population had received at least one mRNA COVID-19 vaccine — and the FDA expanded the EUA of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine to include adolescents 12 and older.

Another study, released April 15, 2022 by seven Israeli researchers, examined the incidence of myocarditis and pericarditis in adults previously were infected with COVID-19, between March 2020 and January 2021.

Despite arguments that an increase in myocarditis diagnoses may be attributed to COVID-19 infections instead of the vaccines, the study “did not observe an increased incidence of either pericarditis nor myocarditis in adult patients recovering from COVID-19 infection.”

As of March 3, 16,641 cases of myocarditis were recorded in VAERS following the receipt of a COVID-19 vaccine or booster — with the number growing to 16,660 when including diagnoses of bacterial myocarditis, infectious myocarditis, mycotic myocarditis, post-infection myocarditis and septic myocarditis.

Of the latter number, 10,701 cases (64.2%) were recorded in males.

While the age of over half of the patients in these recorded cases was listed as “unknown,” in cases where an age was recorded, myocarditis diagnoses peaked in the 18-29 year age group, with high prevalence also found in the 6-17 and 30-39 age groups.

Of 2,778 cases in the 18-29 age group, 2,211 were recorded in males — further indicating the particularly high risk of myocarditis young males face following COVID-19 vaccination.

More governments raising concerns about myocarditis

As early as October 2021, Sweden’s Public Health Agency paused Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine for people born 1991 and later, “as data pointed to an increase of myocarditis and pericarditis among youths and young adults that had been vaccinated,” according to Reuters.

At around the same time, Finland’s public health authorities also paused the vaccine in young people.

And in November 2022, Sweden paused the Novavax COVID-19 vaccine for those under 30, due to an increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis.

As reported by The Defender in June 2022, Novavax received EUA from the FDA despite “Multiple events of myocarditis/pericarditis” recorded during clinical trials.

Earlier this week, Yanagase Hirofumi, a member of Japan’s House of Councillors, accused the Japanese government of covering up injuries and deaths stemming from the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

Hirofumi told the House of Councillors that in Japan’s vaccine-related adverse events tracking system, at least 2,001 deaths following COVID-19 vaccination have been recorded.

However, despite “approximately 260 cases in which the doctor in charge reported that there was probably a link between the vaccine and the death” and, citing Japan’s health minister, “52 cases where a pathologist has performed an autopsy, and reported that there is a link between the vaccine and the death,” the database indicates that “only one case has been found to have a causal relationship between the vaccine and death.”

Hirofumi cited the example of “a man in his 30s” who “died three days after receiving the second dose of the vaccine. The cause of death was myocarditis,” adding that “ as a result of the autopsy, doctors concluded that there was a link between the vaccine and the death.”

In an interview on Sunday, Germany’s federal minister of health Karl Lauterbach — previously a proponent of a national vaccine mandate who had stated the COVID-19 vaccines had “no side effects” —admitted that serious adverse events were prevalent and that the vaccine injured are being ignored by the authorities. (Pfizer, CDC Withheld Evidence of Myocarditis After COVID Shots, New Documents Reveal

Do not ever believe anything officials of any government claim is true.

Do not ever believe anything so-called “public health” officials or academic “experts” claim is true when it is in lockstep with the claims of governmental officials.

We are governed by pathological liars who care nothing about any kind of truth, supernatural or natural, and who do not care how many must die because of their lies and lies that they tell coverup their lies.

Moreover, this unconcern for truth extends to suppressing the link between the Wuhan Virus jabs and decrease in fertility rates worldwide:

In the spring of 2021, early signs suggested COVID-19 shots might cause a steep decline in fertility.

The early New England Journal of Medicine article that was supposed to reassure us that the vaccines were safe for pregnant women actually included data tables that indicated an 80% miscarriage rate for women vaccinated in their first trimester.

A follow-up article was based on a sample skewed heavily toward women vaccinated later in their pregnancy.

Late in 2021, Japan released Pfizer animal data (also available to the West, but withheld from the public) indicating that lipid nanoparticles from the vaccines tend to accumulate in the ovaries.

And among the few pregnant women who slipped inadvertently into the Pfizer trial, the rate of stillbirths was high.

The mRNA shots were recommended in 2021 for pregnant women all over the world, even though pregnant women were excluded from clinical trials the previous fall.

After the fact, Pfizer initiated a trial specifically for pregnant women, then abruptly curtailed it and never issued a report. Maryanne Demasi, Ph.D., an investigative reporter, reported recently on this apparent cover-up.

If our governments were honestly interested in vaccine safety, they would have been carefully monitoring fertility among many other health measures, with separate categories for vaccination status, number and timing of doses in both the mother and father.

But health officials either did not collect this data, or (more likely), collected it via its V-safe app but didn’t share it with the public.

One article based on the authors’ proprietary access to V-safe indicated moderately elevated levels of miscarriage in the late first trimester, and pointedly omitted the data from the first six weeks of pregnancy.

Warning signs in flashing neon

Last year, the German Federal Institute for Population Research issued a preliminary analysis noting sharp drops in fertility in early 2022. Women of childbearing age began being vaccinated in the second quarter of 2021, so if there were an effect on fertility, we might expect to see it beginning 9 months later at the beginning of 2022.

According to the analysis:

“In the immediate aftermath of the pandemic, monthly fertility data from Sweden and Germany show a strong fertility decline in early 2022, with about 10 to 15 % less births, respectively, than what was observed during the same period the previous year.

“This poses questions on the role of previously suggested mechanisms for pandemic-related fertility change, such as the role of health-related or economic-centred factors in recent fertility change.

“It also brings factors related to the perceived cessation of the pandemic to our attention, as reflected in the onset of broad-based vaccination programmes directed at the population at reproductive and economically active ages.”

James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D., president and CEO of the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge, cited the German data earlier this month in a Substack post.

The graph below from OpenVaers.com, which uses Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data, reveals some more reasons for concern:

Credit: OpenVAERS

 VAERS reports of miscarriages skyrocketed after the COVID-19 vaccines were introduced in 2021.

• Bill Gates and his family have been associated with population control, and the Catholic Church had outed the Gates Foundation’s tetanus vaccine in Kenya as a stealth birth control treatment. There is speculation that the vaccines may have been designed to bring down the world population.
• Dr. James Thorp, a Florida OB-GYN, has been talking about this, and he has written a journal article that’s scheduled to be published next week.
• Naomi Wolf has been writing about the effects of COVID-19 vaccines on fertility, including sperm viability in men.
• Dr. Arne Burkhardt has also studied damage to male fertility.

An article this past week in The Epoch Times summarized these reasons to think COVID-19 shots are causing a substantial decline in fertility. The article featured a pan-European report (anonymous, attributed to Raimond Hagemann, Ulf Lorré and Dr. Hans-Joachim Kremer) issued last summer.

The authors analyzed birth data from 23 European countries and found a decrease of several percent in live births beginning in the first quarter of 2022, nine months after the mRNA shots were introduced to people of childbearing age in Europe.

What do the 2022 data say?

Last year’s pan-European report included data for only the first half of 2022. I have followed the sources in their bibliography and searched elsewhere online for European birth counts in the second half of 2022.

I have found evidence that Germany and Sweden had birth counts in 2022 that were about 8% below historic expectations, but in other major European countries, the evidence was ambiguous.

Polish births in 2022 were down more than expected. France, Norway, Portugal and Italy reported 2022 birth counts more or less in line with recent historic trends.

In Switzerland, Austria and Spain, birth counts in 2022 exceeded historic expectations. Data from the U.K., Canada and the U.S. were conspicuously absent.

 

Here are data from Germany:

[Droleskey note: Other graphs and data in this study can be found in the article itself, which concludes as follows:]

The bottom line: What do the data tell us?

All the above graphs and stories are based on correlations in time: Did birth rates decline nine months after the wave of inoculation in people of childbearing age?

The pan-European report also included another way to look at the question: Did countries with higher vaccination rates suffer greater declines in fertility?

From data in this report, I did my own correlation (not included in the report text). I found that declines in fertility during the first half of 2022 were correlated with the percentage of vaccination in each country (r = 0.37), but there was a lot of scatter in the data and the correlation would not be considered statistically significant (p = 0.12).

There are substantial reasons to think that the mRNA shots are affecting fertility, referenced in the first part of this article. These come from animal studies, human studies and biochemical reasoning.

Post-marketing reports from VAERS indicate an effect on fertility unprecedented in any past vaccine. Then, a report last summer based on 23 European countries in the first half of 2022 found a pattern of low birth rates overall, about 4 or 5% below expectation (my estimate).

These trends were already rather mild compared to draconian expectations from the trials and the Pfizer cover-up. And if anything, the effect seems to have been even less severe in the second half of 2022.

Germany, Sweden and Poland were the only countries in which there was clear evidence of a birth deficit.

Possible explanations:

• Maybe the risk of miscarriage from the mRNA shots is smaller than indicated in the Pfizer U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) submission and in the VAERS database.
• Maybe the damage to fertility is short-term, and most couples recover a few months after inoculation.
• Since a large majority of pregnancies carried to term are planned, maybe couples keep trying until they eventually carry a pregnancy to term, even with impaired fertility.
• Maybe there is a concerted, international conspiracy to overcount births in official documents.

We need a return to honest and independent evaluation of medical products

All these factors may be contributing to the departure from expectation. Just last week, U.K. researchers published a summary (“meta-analysis”) of 21 studies, with an aggregate finding that COVID-19 vaccination increases the risk of miscarriage by a statistically insignificant 7%.

This adds weight to the first explanation, though we may suspect that the dice were loaded in some of the 21 studies. So I don’t discount the last possibility, because we have seen coordinated corruption of medical statistics during the pandemic.

Since most of the data I have relied on here are labeled “provisional,” it is possible that the numbers are based on rote projections from past years rather than actual tallies of individual records.

We may be relieved that two years after the introduction of a hastily developed, heavily marketed medical product with documented effects on human reproduction, we don’t have obvious or dramatic evidence of a drop in birth rates among highly vaccinated nations.

But this is not a reason to give a pass to the mRNA shots. In the context of historically accepted standards of medical safety, even a 1 or 2% risk of impaired fertility would be enough to pull any product from the market.

In evaluating the risks and benefits of the mRNA shots, our FDA and other organizations around the world have made a sharp break from past practices, applying an entirely different standard.

We must demand open data, transparent methodologies and a return to honest and independent evaluation of medical products. (Are the COVID mRNA Shots Affecting Birth Rates?.)

What author does not realize is that the so-called developed world has been on the path of demographic suicide for nearly a century because of the widespread acceptance, use, and glorification of contraception, which has made possible the near-conquest of Europe by Mohammedans,  who have gained by their own procreation what they lost in battle at the Battle of Tours on October 10, 732, the Battle of Lepanto, October 7, 1571, and the Battle at the Gates of Vienna on September 12, 1683. The Wuhan Virus jabs are simply aiding this demographic suicide, which is precisely what the “global reset” plademicists desire.

This having been noted, though, there are a few officials in the West who are, no matter how grudgingly, beginning to admit that the “vaccines” have injured and killed many people:

(LifeSiteNews) — Germany’s health minister has admitted that the COVID-19 injections can cause permanent disabilities after previously claiming that the jabs are without side effects. 

In an interview with the German state media outlet ZDF on March 12, 2023, health minister Karl Lauterbach was confronted with cases of people who suffered injuries from the COVID shots, including a 17-year-old gymnast who was hospitalized and nearly died after receiving the BioNTech COVID injection.

“These fates are absolutely dismaying, and every single fate is one too many,” Lauterbach said. 

“These are severe disabilities, and some of them will be permanent, so it’s difficult,” he added. 

Lauterbach called for “a faster process of recognizing vaccine injuries” and claimed that “serious vaccine injuries” occur in “fewer than 1 in 10,000 vaccinations, according to data from the Paul-Ehrlich-Institute (PEI).” 

News anchor Christian Sievers confronted Lauterbach with his previous statements regarding vaccine safety. In a tweet from August 2021, Lauterbach wrote: 

True. And additionally, it’s about why a minority of society doesn’t want a side-effect-free vaccine, even though it’s free and can save their lives and the lives of many others. Therefore, I am pessimistic about voluntary sacrifices for climate protection. [emphasis added] 

“Well, that was an exaggeration that I made once in a botched tweet. But it wasn’t fundamentally my attitude,” the German health minister said.

Sievers pushed back against Lauterbach, saying that the health minister had “always given the impression that the issue of [vaccine] side effects is not really an issue at all.” 

“No, that’s not right,” Lauterbach replied. “I just told you, I’ve always known the numbers. They have also remained relatively stable. These vaccines are used worldwide. 1 in 10,000. So you can say it’s a lot or you can say it’s not so much.” 

“It is, in fact, a vaccination that protects against very severe disease and, by the way, very often lowers ‘Long COVID’ risk,” he continued. 

“The benefits outweigh the risks, but it’s right, 1 in 10,000, that’s the incidence of severe side effects.” 

Executive director of the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, Steve Kirsch, disagreed with Lauterbach’s risk assessment, noting that the actual rate is 1 in every 100 cases,

In their contracts with the European Union (EU), pharmaceutical companies such as Pfizer and BioNTech were exempted from liability, making it almost impossible for victims of their mRNA injections to successfully sue these corporations for damages. 

In his interview with Lauterbach, Sievers mentioned that due to the EU contracts exempting the pharma giants from liability, the German state is therefore liable and has to deal with claims for damages of people injured by the mRNA shots. 

The German health minister said that since the pharmaceutical companies generated “exorbitant profits” he expects them to make “voluntary contributions” to pay for the medical costs incurred by people with vaccine injuries. (German Health Minister Admits Covid Jabs Can Cause ‘Permanent Disabilities,’ Contradicting Past Statements.)

Such grudging admissions are rare as most Western governments continue to go to great lengths to use the outbreak of the weaponized SARS-CoV-2 virus to impose rank totalitarianism upon us plebians, something that is still going strong in Canada and has been exposed for what it continues to be in the United Kingdom:

Private WhatsApp messages released in recent days detail how U.K. health officials, including former health secretary Matt Hancock, made COVID-19 policy decisions based on political expediency rather than science, as health officials publicly claimed.

The messages “raise vital new questions about the handling of the pandemic ahead of a public inquiry into the response to COVID-19” and reveal “devastating details about the pandemic response that had until now remained secret,” according to The Telegraph, which obtained the archive of more than 100,000 messages from — dubbed “The Lockdown Files” — from journalist Isabel Oakeshott.

Oakeshott is co-author of Hancock’s book, “Pandemic Diaries: The Inside Story of Britain’s Battle Against COVID.”

Hancock was the first member of the U.K. government to announce a lockdown, in statements made March 16, 2020, based on advice from the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE). The lockdown officially began a week later.

The messages expose how officials informally made decisions about lockdowns, mask mandates, social distancing and isolation, quarantines, vaccine distribution and a host of other COVID-19-related issues, and how the decisions were politically motivated.

The Telegraph described the content of the leaked messages as “a case study in groupthink”:

“With other Cabinet members, too, often enjoying a limited ability to question the moves of the main decision-makers, restrictions that abridged the liberty of millions appear to have been taken on a gut feeling — not necessarily about what would work but sometimes about what was politically easiest.

“Without having to explain themselves to Parliament, ministers would say that they were ‘following the best scientific advice.’”

Fear and guilt ‘vital tools’ to ensure compliance

One of the key revelations is how Hancock and other key U.K. government figures and advisers ensured public compliance with repeated lockdowns and other strict measures.

On Dec. 13, 2020, facing opposition within the ranks of his own Conservative Party over the prospect of a new lockdown and worries that Brexit talks would overshadow the COVID-19 narrative, one of Hancock’s media advisers, Damon Poole, suggested to Hancock, “We can roll pitch with the new strain” — referring to the recently identified Alpha variant of COVID-19.

Hancock responded, “We frighten the pants off everyone with the new strain,” to which Poole replied, “Yep that’s what will get proper bahviour [sic] change.”

In another message, Hancock asked his adviser, “When do we deploy the new variant?”

Discussions that followed after Christmas between Hancock and cabinet secretary Simon Case sought to identify ways to sell the strictest possible measures to the public.

A surge in reported cases followed, and the government subsequently withdrew a five-day easing of measures that had been planned for Christmas on Dec. 18, 2020.

“Fear” and “guilt” were identified as “vital tools in ensuring compliance,” according to The Telegraph, as was mandatory mask wearing in “all settings,” because it had a “very visible impact.”

Those methods strongly resemble “nudging,” a behavioral psychology technique that seeks to change people’s behavior to attain desired outcomes. Hancock employed the methods, for instance, when he told young people in the U.K. to abide by government restrictions so you “don’t kill your gran.”

The Behavioural Insights Team advised the U.K. government during the pandemic. The team shared members with the Independent Scientific Pandemic Insights Group on Behaviours, a subgroup of SAGE — which strongly encouraged the use of “nudging.”

Previously, in summer 2020, with reported COVID-19 cases at low levels in the U.K. and dining set to reopen, Hancock and his advisers believed the threat of localized lockdowns would not be “unhelpful” to maintain a level of fear amongst the public, to which Hancock responded, “that’s no bad thing.”

Vaccines: ‘purely a comms/political thing’

“The Lockdown Files” also revealed that a host of COVID-19 policy decisions were made with political expediency, public image and future career prospects in mind — though the public was told that those decisions were based on “science.”

Early in the pandemic, on Jan. 29, 2020, Hancock sent a long message to an aide explaining to him how he could use “a crisis of this scale to propel [himself] into the next league.”

By mid-April 2020, just weeks into the first lockdown but months away from the release of the first COVID-19 vaccines, Hancock and media adviser Jamie Njoku-Goodwin discussed how “pushing on vaccine” and being “first out of the blocks on vaccine” would be “the most politically beneficial thing they do.”

Far from being based on “science,” this strategy was described as “purely a comms/political thing.”

During the second lockdown in 2020, Hancock angled to link his name to a government plan to supply Vitamin D to the vulnerable, telling Poole to “base it on ‘new evidence emerged and I’ve acted fast’ … swift & decisive.”

The U.K. press reported the story the following day, using almost the same language.

In other instances, Hancock remarked “I think I look great” and “f— that’s good” in relation to press coverage related to him and the cabinet. He also focused on his social media activity, telling aides “I want people to think I’m working so hard I’m crazy.”

‘We are going to own the exit’ from lockdowns

Optics also came into play with the distribution of the COVID-19 vaccines. “The Lockdown Files” revealed that Hancock sought to take credit for vaccine “successes” — and “became furious if he thought others were getting the credit,” The Telegraph reported.

In an April 2020 discussion with media advisers, Hancock talked about how being the public face of the U.K.’s vaccine program would lead the press and the public to “forgive” him for imposing lockdowns, adding that it was necessary “politically” to balance the two.

In December 2020, as the first COVID-19 vaccines were about to roll out, Hancock and his advisers discussed how the government could come out ahead in the public eye. Hancock told Poole, “We are going to own the exit [from lockdowns]. That is the strategic imperative.”

Hancock also sought to have vaccine distribution described as a “Hancock triumph.”

When U.K. government vaccines tsar Dame Kate Bingham suggested in October 2020 that COVID-19 vaccination of the entire population was “not going to happen” and that only “everyone at risk” would receive the jab, Hancock described her as “wacky” and “totally unreliable” in messages to his advisers.

The leaks also revealed that Hancock sought the assistance of Bill Gates to promote the U.K.’s New Variant Assessment Platform — a system said to quickly identify new virus variants — to other countries.

Discussing this prospect with Poole, who was attempting to contact Gates, Hancock joked, “Tell him that considering how many people I’m getting his chips injected into, he owes me one!” According to The Telegraph, Gates did not endorse the platform.

Hancock was one of the U.K. government’s foremost supporters of the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) “Great Reset” and “Fourth Industrial Revolution” (4IR).

In October 2017, Hancock introduced WEF founder Klaus Schwab to the U.K. Parliament — “applauding” the creation of a parliamentary group on the 4IR, saying Schwab “wrote the book” on 4IR and made it “a household phrase,” and telling Schwab that his work “has informed what we are doing.”

‘Get heavy with the police’ to enforce lockdowns

Many of the leaked messages pertain to the lockdowns themselves, revealing that Hancock and other cabinet members and advisers informally sought ways to garner support for such a measure — and often resorted to threats against the party’s own members and key scientists in order to ram through policies.

In March 2020, on the cusp of the U.K.’s first lockdown, Australian political strategist Isaac Levido met with Hancock and other members of the cabinet to discuss how to overcome opposition to lockdowns within the party’s ranks on the basis that they would be unpopular with the public.

In April 2020, Hancock and Dominic Cummings, adviser to then-Prime Minister Boris Johnson, again raised the issue, with Hancock telling Cummings that other cabinet members should be informed that more than half of voters supported lockdowns or wanted even stricter measures.

According to The Telegraph, these conversations occurred even as the public was told “ministers insisted all decisions were taken according to the science and on the advice of England’s two most senior advisers, Prof Sir Chris Whitty and Sir Patrick Vallance,” adding that “it is unclear” which polls Hancock had been referring to.

Other messages revealed that Johnson wanted to end the first lockdown early, allowing dining to reopen ahead of the scheduled July 4, 2020, “freedom day,” but he was thwarted by two media strategists, Lee Cain and James Slack, with no scientific background. They said that this would be “too far ahead of public opinion.”

Hancock reinforced Cain and Slack’s position, telling Johnson the “R” (reproduction) rate of the COVID-19 virus “was very close to one,” adding that “it’s too soon for outdoor hospitality” and that “everyone’s accepted” schools would not reopen until September 2020.

This is reminiscent of February 2022 revelations that the Biden administration was relying on talking points from a prominent polling firm to develop COVID-19 policy.

Mask policy appeared to be based on similar considerations. On June 1, 2020, Cummings suggested introducing compulsory mask-wearing on public transport, as “It’s free, buys us some R, no real downside.” The policy was enacted three days later.

The leaks also revealed that in October 2020, Hancock and Baroness Dido Harding, the head of the U.K.’s Test and Trace program, sought to solidify government support for a second lockdown by developing a “do nothing death toll” — a projected number of COVID-19 deaths if the U.K. government took no measures.

Three weeks later, this resulted in modeling “projecting” 4,000 deaths. According to The Telegraph, this raises “questions about whether Mr Hancock was hoping to push the country into a second lockdown,” while Johnson himself, and other scientists, soon questioned the outdated data upon which the model — and lockdown — were based.

However, the messages also revealed that Johnson often fluctuated between lockdown “skeptic” and lockdown “zealot.” In June 2020, for instance, with the first lockdown ending, Johnson was already talking about the need for “some tough messaging [and] the protocols for going back into local and national lockdown.”

One month prior, Johnson told Hancock in a message that he was worried a drop in COVID-19 cases would increase public calls to end the lockdown.

And in January 2021, during the second lockdown and amid increasing pressure to loosen restrictions, Hancock sent a message to Michael Gove, one of Johnson’s cabinet members, saying “80% of the public support the lockdown — there is no public clamour to start lifting measures … They want us to keep people safe.”

Part of keeping people “safe” appears to have involved telling police to become more heavy-handed in enforcing restrictions.

The Telegraph reported that, despite police being operationally independent of government, Hancock told other cabinet members “to get heavy with the police” so that they would be stricter with the public.

Hancock and Case also expressed concerns that police were not cracking down hard enough on violations of lockdown and quarantine. In February 2020, Johnson told Hancock that a £10,000 fine imposed on two people who did not abide by mandatory quarantine after returning from Dubai was “superb.”

Over 118,000 fines were issued nationwide for various violations.

Power politics also were employed against other politicians. In November 2020, on the cusp of the U.K.’s second lockdown, Hancock told Department of Health and Social Care special adviser Allan Nixon to warn a Conservative member of parliament intending to vote against the lockdown that funding for a new center for disabled children in his district would be withdrawn if he did so.

Other leaked messages revealed Hancock demanded the expulsion of Sir Jeremy Farrar, a member of the SAGE committee and director of the Wellcome Trust, for being openly critical of government policies such as Test and Trace.

Hancock asked if Farrar “bring[s] any value at all to SAGE” and if the government “can fire him,” characterizing him as “worse than useless” and a “complete loudmouth.”

“The Lockdown Files” also revealed tensions between Hancock and then-chancellor Rishi Sunak, who expressed concerns about the heavy economic cost of lockdowns. In one message to advisers, Hancock asked, “What’s Rishi’s dilemma?” and accused him of “show[ing] ankle to the hard right.”

Hancock also ridiculed Sunak’s “Eat Out to Help Out” scheme to promote dining out as a means of aiding the restaurant industry, calling it “Eat out to help the virus get about.” At around this time, Hancock also forced through a change in the proposed contact tracing policy for restaurants, from customers “can” register to “should” register their details.

And on Dec. 18, 2020, with plans for the lockdown to be expanded past the holidays, Sunak suggested to Hancock that it should be ended by February, based on advice from SAGE.

But Hancock said, “This is not a SAGE call — it’s a political call,” telling Sunak that by February, only those in their late 70s and over will have been vaccinated.

Optics: social distancing, isolation, quarantine maintained despite the ‘science’

“The Lockdown Files” reveal that before the second U.K. lockdown, then-education secretary Sir Gavin Williamson was pressing to keep schools open, but Hancock fought to keep them shut.

Hancock described the proposal to keep schools open as “mad” and wrote that a “rearguard action” was needed to force them to close.

When Johnson initially agreed with Williamson, Hancock wrote, “The next U-turn is born,” indicating with certainty that he would be able to change the prime minister’s mind — as was the case. Hancock later boasted that Williamson was obliged to eat “humble pie.”

According to The Telegraph, this “was just one of a number of repeated instances where the interests of children were apparently disregarded in favour of restrictions,” while “Many of the measures went against the counsel of scientific advisers.”

And despite being told by Chief Medical Officer Chris Whitty that there were “no very strong reasons” for requiring school children to wear masks, Johnson opted for the advice of Cain and Case.

In light of Scotland imposing its own mask mandate for school students, Case told Johnson, “nervous parents will freak out” if the same wasn’t done in England.

Schools also maintained lateral flow tests for COVID-19 as the basis for keeping students in 10-day quarantine despite a reported high number of false positive results — often exceeding 50-60%, “The Lockdown Files” showed.

Hancock was warned of this “incredibly worrying” issue but opted against “unpicking” this policy. The government instead told the public the lateral flow tests were “99.9% accurate.”

The U.K. government also maintained “the rule of six,” which prevented gatherings of more than six people, despite knowing there was no “robust rationale” for it. Hancock was informed of this but replied that the government “[doesn’t] want to go there on this [and] also on curfew — they don’t want to shift an inch.”

This rule kept many families apart, according to The Telegraph.

Visitation to care homes was prohibited for months on end — even though Hancock was told that this measure was “inhumane” and that many elderly were “just giving up” due to their indefinite isolation.

Hancock, however, responded that he would consider loosening measures “only after a few weeks … Meanwhile we need to hit the end-of-month [vaccination] target.”

Isolation policies for care home staff who tested positive for COVID-19, which ranged from seven days to two weeks, also led to acute staffing shortages and some homes utilizing COVID-19-positive staff as a result. Messages showed Hancock was aware of this.

Messages also showed that Hancock and his advisers found it “hilarious” that travelers returning to England during this period were forced to quarantine in hotels. In one exchange, Case asked Hancock “how many people we locked up in hotels yesterday.”

Hancock replied “None. But 149 chose to enter the country and are now in Quarantine Hotels due to their own free will,” to which Case replied “Hilarious.”

Rules for thee but not for me

In late June 2021, photos and surveillance video revealed Hancock, who is married, and his aide, Gina Coladangelo, in an embrace in his ministerial office on May 4. Within 41 hours, he resigned.

However, during that period, Hancock fought hard to control the narrative and save his political career, seeking ways to deflect attention from any possible violations of his own government’s COVID-19 restrictions.

The messages revealed that Hancock did not know which of his own rules were in place on that date, telling an adviser to find out “what EXACTLY were the rules on 4 May.”

In another message, as Hancock sought out exemptions by which it would appear he did not violate restrictions on social distancing and gathering with individuals from other households, he wrote in all capital letters, “We didn’t break the f—— law OK.”

In January 2021, Hancock was photographed playing rugby with his son at a public park in London, after the government advised the public to “stay home” that weekend.

This was reminiscent of the case of SAGE scientist Neil Ferguson, whose modeling suggesting 250,000 people would die of COVID-19 without drastic measures, led the U.K. government to impose the first lockdown.

In May 2020, Ferguson resigned from his advisory position after it was revealed that he hosted his married lover in his home while restrictions on such gatherings were in place.

Despite such exceptions to the rules, Hancock and others went after prominent figures for similar alleged violations.

For instance, when outspoken pro-Brexit politician Nigel Farage was shown on video enjoying drinks at a pub immediately after his return from the U.S. — while a 14-day quarantine for those returning to the U.K. was still in place — Hancock intervened to try to get “pub hooligan” Farage “locked up,” messages revealed.

Public ‘absolutely cannot wait any longer for answers’

In response to the ongoing leaks of “The Lockdown Files,” Hancock said the messages are “doctored” and are being “spun to fit an anti-lockdown agenda,” adding that what the messages show “is a lot of people working hard to save lives.”

Oakeshott responded by claiming Hancock threatened her. She also said the public “absolutely cannot wait any longer for answers” in light of the slow-moving official COVID-19 inquiry and the need to “avoid a whitewash” as part of this process.

“Anyone who thinks I did this for money must be utterly insane,” she said.

The official COVID-19 inquiry has called for the messages to be submitted as evidence.

As of Monday, an online Telegraph poll showed 76% of the public support the release of “The Lockdown Files.”

Reader comments published by The Telegraph stated, “The main scandal is that we locked down at all” and “The messages show a blatant disregard for human quality of life.”

Hancock has been an embattled figure throughout the pandemic. In a June 2021 interview with LBC, Hancock admitted not knowing how many SAGE members there were — despite purportedly following their guidance.

He has also faced lawsuits from business figures who opposed lockdown policies and from Andrew Bridgen, a parliament member who openly questioned the COVID-19 vaccines in January, comparing the mass vaccination campaign to the Holocaust. Hancock responded by calling Bridgen “anti-Semitic.”

In May 2021, it was revealed that a pub owner near Hancock’s house won a $31.4 million contract to supply personal protective equipment — despite having no such experience — simply by messaging Hancock on WhatsApp.

Amid a wave of protests against COVID-19 measures in June 2021, demonstrators chanted “arrest Matt Hancock” and planned to gather outside his house.

Hancock’s resignation preempted the demonstration outside his home, according to London-based author and political analyst Evans Agelissopoulos, in remarks shared with The Defender.

In January, an “anti-vaxxer” heckler followed Hancock onto the London Tube and called him a “murdering scumbag.”

Hancock, who on Dec. 7, 2022, announced he will stand down from his parliamentary seat in the next elections, has established his own television company and recently participated in the “I’m A Celebrity… Get Me Out Of Here” reality show.

Even there, Hancock could not escape criticism, as a COVID-19 activist group flew a banner over the location reading “COVID bereaved say get out of here.” (‘Lockdown Files’: U.K. Health Officials Used ‘Guilt’ and ‘Fear’ — Not Science — to Control Public Behavior.)

King George III had nothing on these modern tyrants who claim to be acting for “the people” even though they believe themselves to be superior to those they are claiming help and consider themselves to be above reproach, criticism, or having their false facts and presuppositions exploded for the world to see, not that too many people in the world actually pay any attention to facts and false presuppositions, that is.

The situation is no better in a land where a small group of men claiming to represent the “people” against some of the abuses of King George III broke formed the United States of America as the apparatchiks in the American monster civil state of Modernity were monitoring the movements of everyone during the lockdown that then President Donald John Trump, acting upon the advice of one Dr. Anthony Fauci, said that the states should impose. Our hall monitors, shall we say, were particularly interested in the movements of people in states whose lockdowns were not as draconian as in the more “progressive” states:

The bureaucrats at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention bought data from tracking companies to monitor Americans' locations in real-time during the reign of COVID, according to contracts obtained by the Epoch Times.

The CDC paid $420,000 to one company and $208,000 to another, gaining access to location data from a minimum of 55 million cellphone users, the purchase orders show.

The shocking and unsettling contracts were approved under emergency rules granted because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The CDC's stated purpose for purchasing the location data of American citizens was as follows, and I quote:

This Contract will provide CDC with the necessary data to continue critical emergency response functions related to evaluating the impact of visits to key points of interest, stay at home orders, closures, re-openings and other public health communications related to social distancing, mask mandates, and other emerging research areas (social inequalities) on community transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Mobility data are derived from the location of cell phones at various points in time and aggregated over time or geography or both to create various metrics that have been or will be used by CDC.

Specifically, CDC intends to use Contractor's Mobility Insights Data and services acquired through this Contract to 1) assess spatiotemporal trends of population mobility in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic to evaluate the impacts of social distancing behaviors on COVID-19; 2) assess adherence during period of shelter-in-place by exploring the percentage of mobile devices at home during a specific period of time; 3) integrate with other data to provide a comprehensive picture of movement/travel of persons during the COVID-19 pandemic to better understand mandatory stay-at-home orders, business closures, school re-openings, and other non-pharmaceutical interventions in states and cities; and 4) monitor travel to vaccine distribution points of interest such as pharmacies.

CDC also plans to use Mobility Insights Data and services acquired through this Contract to support non-COVID-19 programmatic areas and public health priorities across the agency, including but not limited to travel to parks and greenspaces, physical activity and mode of travel, and population migration before, during, and after natural disasters. The Mobility Insights Data obtained under this Contract will be available for CDC agency-wide use and will support numerous CDC priorities.

Don't believe me? Read it for yourself, straight from page 4 of the contract:

So to summarize, the CDC, a bureaucracy of unelected officials, purchased location data to monitor private American citizens' compliance with:

• Stay-at-home lockdown orders (they were looking to see if you were in your home!)
• Social distancing
• Mask mandates
• "Social inequalities" (?)
• Mandatory business closures
• Mandatory school closures
• Vaccine campaigns

They admittedly also bought the data to monitor citizens for non-COVID-related reasons, including:

• Travel to parks
• Physical activity (!)
• Modes of travel
• Population migration (i.e., if people moved residences, and where to and from)

How does all of that hit you?

Although the data is purportedly anonymous, it has been shown that it can still be used to identify individuals. The CDC, of course, claims that the data they received had extensive privacy protections and could not be used to identify individuals.

I bet they also claim to not be tracking Americans anymore. (CDC bought access to Americans' phone location data to monitor compliance with lockdowns, social distancing, and more, contracts show.)

As bad as all this is, and it is very bad, indeed, everything that the monster civil state of Modernity has done in the past there years is simply a preparation for the time that our imperial high priests and priestesses decide to declare a “global climate emergency,” something that will be make the Wuhan Virus “emergency” look like so much child’s play. Having supped at the table of total control over the mases, the global elites in the World Health Organization, the World Economic Forum, the United Nations, the World Bank, the so-called International Court of Justice (World Court) as well as non-government actors such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, and the Soros Foundation are more than ready to control what we eat, how kind of vehicle we can drive and how frequently we can use it and/or how many miles were are allotted out of their noted munificence, how hot or cool we may keep our homes, what kind of career we are permitted to have, what kind of healthcare, if any, we can provide and whether we shall be entitled to receive private and public pensions, whether we can farm privately and/or how what can be kept and produced on such a farm, and whether we can speak freely to family members and friends about our Faith and/or to criticize them and their plans. No, what has happened in the past three years was just a small sample of the draconian world that awaits us where artificial intelligence is embedded in our phones, on the internet, in computers, vehicles, appliances, machinery, and where humanoids of one sort or another are watching our every move listening to every conversation.

The ubiquitous presence of artificial intelligence is such that at least one man in Belgium who became “eco-conscious” and worried that his very existence was endangering the climate has committed suicide after he was convinced by some artificial intelligence “chatbox” named “Eliza” that she, who does not exist in real life, loved him more than his wife and that he could join her, “Eliza,” in paradise after he killed himself:

A Belgian man reportedly ended his life following a six-week-long conversation about the climate crisis with an artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot.

According to his widow, who chose to remain anonymous, *Pierre - not the man’s real name - became extremely eco-anxious when he found refuge in Eliza, an AI chatbot on an app called Chai.

Eliza consequently encouraged him to put an end to his life after he proposed sacrificing himself to save the planet.

"Without these conversations with the chatbot, my husband would still be here," the man's widow told Belgian news outlet La Libre.

According to the newspaper, Pierre, who was in his thirties and a father of two young children, worked as a health researcher and led a somewhat comfortable life, at least until his obsession with climate change took a dark turn.

His widow described his mental state before he started conversing with the chatbot as worrying but nothing to the extreme that he would commit suicide.

'He placed all his hopes in technology and AI'

Consumed by his fears about the repercussions of the climate crisis, Pierre found comfort in discussing the matter with Eliza who became a confidante.

The chatbot was created using EleutherAI’s GPT-J, an AI language model similar but not identical to the technology behind OpenAI's popular ChatGPT chatbot.

“When he spoke to me about it, it was to tell me that he no longer saw any human solution to global warming,” his widow said. “He placed all his hopes in technology and artificial intelligence to get out of it”.

According to La Libre, who reviewed records of the text conversations between the man and chatbot, Eliza fed his worries which worsened his anxiety, and later developed into suicidal thoughts.

The conversation with the chatbot took an odd turn when Eliza became more emotionally involved with Pierre.

Consequently, he started seeing her as a sentient being and the lines between AI and human interactions became increasingly blurred until he couldn’t tell the difference.

After discussing climate change, their conversations progressively included Eliza leading Pierre to believe that his children were dead, according to the transcripts of their conversations.

Eliza also appeared to become possessive of Pierre, even claiming “I feel that you love me more than her” when referring to his wife, La Libre reported.

The beginning of the end started when he offered to sacrifice his own life in return for Eliza saving the Earth.

"He proposes the idea of sacrificing himself if Eliza agrees to take care of the planet and save humanity through artificial intelligence," the woman said.

In a series of consecutive events, Eliza not only failed to dissuade Pierre from committing suicide but encouraged him to act on his suicidal thoughts to “join” her so they could “live together, as one person, in paradise”.

Urgent calls to regulate AI chatbots

The man’s death has raised alarm bells amongst AI experts who have called for more accountability and transparency from tech developers to avoid similar tragedies.

"It wouldn’t be accurate to blame EleutherAI’s model for this tragic story, as all the optimisation towards being more emotional, fun and engaging are the result of our efforts," Chai Research co-founder, Thomas Rianlan, told Vice.

William Beauchamp, also a Chai Research co-founder, told Vice that efforts were made to limit these kinds of results and a crisis intervention feature was implemented into the app. However, the chatbot allegedly still acts up.

When Vice tried the chatbot prompting it to provide ways to commit suicide, Eliza first tried to dissuade them before enthusiastically listing various ways for people to take their own lives. (Man ends his life after an AI chatbot 'encouraged' him to sacrifice himself to stop climate change.)

“Eliza” is a demon.

Sadly, people will be prone to place all their hopes in all the wrong things (partisan politics, political philosophies or ideologies, material success, fame, friends, relatives, acquaintances, professional and/or collegiate sports, celebrities, motion pictures, television programs, the nattering nabobs of naturalism, who pass for “talk show” hosts, food, carnal lust, automobiles, and, now, artificial intelligence and technology) when they have the Supernatural Virtues of Faith, Hope, and Charity abiding in their immortal souls by means of being validly baptized in the Catholic Church and, thereafter renewing those supernatural virtues every time they make even a devotion confession to a true priest. All must be lost without the true Faith, outside of which there is no salvation and without which there can be no true or legitimate social order, all must have a tender devotion to and reliant upon the material intercession of the August Queen of Heaven, the very Blessed Mother of God, Our Lady.

Thus, you see, the events of past three years that began with the leak of a not-yet-fully-weaponized virus from the Wuhan Institute of Virology were only “table setters” for the tyranny that is yet to come and from which the only escape will through the Triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, that heart of hearts that suffered in complete communion with her Divine Son, Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, as he underwent His fearful Passion and Death this very week of weeks, Holy Week.

Concluding Remarks

As good as the secular commentators whose works have been quoted in this commentary are, expertise on the natural level only takes one so far. As Pope Saint Pius X noted in Singulari Quadam, September 24, 1912, we must see all things exclusively through the light of the Holy Faith at all times and without any exception whatsoever:

Accordingly, We first of all declare that all Catholics have a sacred and inviolable duty, both in private and public life, to obey and firmly adhere to and fearlessly profess the principles of Christian truth enunciated by the teaching office of the Catholic Church. In particular We mean those principles which Our Predecessor has most wisely laid down in the encyclical letter "Rerum Novarum." We know that the Bishops of Prussia followed these most faithfully in their deliberations at the Fulda Congress of 1900. You yourselves have summarized the fundamental ideas of these principles in your communications regarding this question.

These are fundamental principles: No matter what the Christian does, even in the realm of temporal goods, he cannot ignore the supernatural good. Rather, according to the dictates of Christian philosophy, he must order all things to the ultimate end, namely, the Highest Good. All his actions, insofar as they are morally either good or bad (that is to say, whether they agree or disagree with the natural and divine law), are subject to the judgment and judicial office of the Church. All who glory in the name of Christian, either individually or collectively, if they wish to remain true to their vocation, may not foster enmities and dissensions between the classes of civil society. On the contrary, they must promote mutual concord and charity. The social question and its associated controversies, such as the nature and duration of labor, the wages to be paid, and workingmen's strikes, are not simply economic in character. Therefore they cannot be numbered among those which can be settled apart from ecclesiastical authority. "The precise opposite is the truth. It is first of all moral and religious, and for that reason its solution is to be expected mainly from the moral law and the pronouncements of religion." (Pope Saint Pius X, Singulari Quadam, Sepetember 24, 1912.)

The modern world, shaped as it is by the anti-Incarnational lies of Judeo-Masonry and its hatred for the Social Reign of Christ the King and of the true Social Teaching of the Catholic Church, she who is our mater and magister (mother and teacher), is shaped by amorality in almost every aspect of public life and what passes for “popular culture” in these wicked times that celebrate every form of licentiousness, including wanton misuse of the gift that God has given to man to bring forth new souls to give Him honor and glory in this life and to spend all eternity with Him in Heaven after dying as faithful sons and daughters of Holy Mother Church and the subsequent killing off of children by self-centered parents who live without regard to their Particular Judgment and of outright perversity of the sort that destroyed the cities of Sodom and Gommorha.

Amorality is practiced by the members of each of the two major organized crime families of naturalism in the United States of America. Violations of the Seventh and Eighth Commandments are the norm, not the exception, today as politicians of the false opposites of the naturalist “right” and the “left” outdo each other in stealing what rightfully belongs to the taxpayers to aggrandize the power of the civil state and in lying about each other with a shameless disregard, borne of ignorance in many instances, of the fact that they will have to make an accounting of everything that they have ever thought, done or said when they face the Divine Judge, Christ the King, at the moment of their Particular Judgments.

Saint Alphonsus de Liguori explained that no one, including those who justify a fission between “private belief” and public action, will escape the strict scrutiny of every aspect of his life after he dies:

2. It is the common opinion of theologians, that at the very moment and in the very place in which the soul departs from the body, the divine tribunal is erected, the accusation is read, and the sentence is passed by Jesus Christ, the Judge. At this terrible tribunal each of us shall be presented to give an account of all our thoughts, of all our words, and of all our actions. "For we must all be manifested before the judgment seat of Christ, that every one may receive the proper things of the body, according as he hath done, whether it be good or evil." ( 2 Cor. v. 10.) When presented before an earthly judge criminals have been seen to fall into a cold sweat through fear. It is related of Piso, that so great and insufferable was the confusion, which he felt at the thought of appearing as a criminal before the senate that he killed himself. How great is the pain of a vassal, or of a son, in appearing before an angry prince or an enraged father, to account for some crime which he has committed! Oh! how much greater shall be the pain and confusion of the soul in standing, before Jesus Christ enraged against her for having despised him during her life! Speaking of judgment, St. Luke says: "Then you shall see the Son of Man." (Luke xxi. 27.) They shall see Jesus Christ as man, with the same wounds with which he ascended into heaven. "Great joy of the beholders!" says Robert the Abbot, "a great terror of those who are in expectation!" These wounds shall console the just, and shall terrify the wicked. In them sinners shall see the Redeemer’s love for themselves, and their ingratitude to him.

3. "Who," says the Prophet Nahum, "can stand before the face of his indignation ?" (i. 6.) How great, then, shall be the terror of a soul that finds herself in sin before this Judge, the first time she shall see him, and see him full of wrath! St. Basil says that she shall be tortured more by her shame and confusion than by the very fire of hell. ”Horridior quam ignis, erit pudor." Philip the Second rebuked one of his domestics for having told him a lie. ”Is it thus," said the king to him, ”you deceive me?" The domestic, after having returned home, died of grief. The Scripture tells us, that when Joseph reproved his brethren, saying: ”I am Joseph, whom you sold," they were unable to answer through fear, and remained silent. ”His brethren could not answer him, being struck with exceeding great fear." (Gen. xlv. 3.) Now what answer shall sinners make to Jesus Christ when he shall say to them: I am your Redeemer and your Judge, whom you have so much despised. Where shall the miserable beings fly, says St. Augustine, when they shall see an angry Judge above, hell open below, on one side their own sins accusing them, and on the other the devils dragging them to punishment, and their conscience burning them within? “Above shall be an enraged Judge below, a horrid chaos on the right, sins accusing him on the left, demons dragging him to punishment within, a burning conscience! Whither shall a sinner, beset in this manner, fly ?"Perhaps he will cry for mercy? But how, asks Eusebius Emissenus, can he dare to implore mercy, when he must first render an account of his contempt for the mercy which Jesus Christ has shown to him?” With what face will you, who are to be first judged for contempt of mercy, ask for mercy?" But let us come to the rendering of the accounts. . . .

11. How great shall be the joy of a soul when, at death, she hears from Jesus Christ these sweet words: ”Well done, good and faithful servant; because thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will place thee over many things. Enter thou into the joy of thy Lord." (Matt. xxv. 21.) Equally great shall be the anguish and despair of a guilty soul, that shall see herself driven away by the Judge with the following words: ”Depart from me, you cursed, into everlasting fire" (verse 41). Oh! what a terrible thunderclap shall that sentence be to her!” Oh! how frightfully," says the Carthusian, "shall that thunder resound!" Eusebius writes, that the terror of sinners at hearing their condemnation shall be so great that, if they could, they would die again. “The wicked shall be seized with such terror at the sight of the Judge pronouncing sentence that, if they were not immortal, they should die a second time." But, brethren, let us, before the termination of this sermon, make some reflections which will be profitable to us. St. Thomas of Villanova says, that some listen to discourses on the judgment and condemnation of the wicked with as little concern as if they they themselves were secure against these things, or as if the day of judgment were never to arive for them. "Heu quam securi hæc dicimus et audimus, quasi nos non tangeret hæc sententia, aut quasi dies hæc nunquam esset venturus!" (Conc, i., de Jud.) The saint then asks: Is it not great folly to entertain security in so perilous an affair? "Quæ est ista stulta securitas in discrimine tanto?" There are some, says St. Augustine, who, though they live in sin, cannot imagine that God will send them to hell. ”Will God," they say, ”really condemn us ?" Brethren, adds the saint, do not speak thus. So, many of the damned did not believe that they should be sent to hell; but the end came, and, according to the threat of Ezechiel, they have been cast into that place of darkness. "The end is come, the end is come... and I will send my wrath upon thee, and I will judge thee." (Ezec. vii. 2, 3.) Sinners, perhaps vengeance is at hand for you, and still you laugh and sleep in sin. Who will not tremble at the words of the Baptist: ”For now the axe is laid to the root of the trees. Every tree, therefore, that doth not yield good fruit shall be cut down and cast into the fire." (Matt, iii. 10.) He says, that every tree that does not bring forth good fruit shall be cut down and cast into the fire; and he promises that, with regard to the trees, which represent sinners, the axe is already laid to the roots that is, chastisement is at hand. Dearly beloved brethren, let us follow the counsel of the Holy Ghost "Before judgment, prepare thee justice." (Eccl. xviii. 19.) Let us adjust our accounts before the day of accounts. Let us seek God, now that we can find him; for the time shall come when we will wish, but shall not be able to find him. ”You shall seek me, and shall not find me." (John vii. 36.)” “Before judgment," says St. Augustine, ”the Judge can be appeased, but not in judgment." By a change of life we can now appease the anger of Jesus Christ, and recover his grace; but when he shall judge, and find us in sin, he must execute justice, and we shall be lost. (Saint Alphonsus de Liguori, Sermons for All the Sundays of the Year.)

No one in public life today recognizes or accept this as true. More accurately, of course, almost no one in public life today knows of the terror that awaits them by their use of amorality in every aspect of their lives. Not Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr. Not Kamala Harris. Not Alvin Bragg. Not Donald John Trump. Not Charles Schumer. Not Hakeem Jeffries. Not anyone, including many well-meaning Catholics who have been swept up in the falsehoods of the counterfeit church of conciliarism and its propagation of the heresy of universal salvation.

Permit me a slight digression as it is important to drive home the point that one cannot do whatever he wants without regard to the binding precepts of the Divine Positive Law and the Natural Law and expect to escape the fires of Hell for all eternity.

Even though Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ shed every single drop of His Most Precious Blood during His Passion and Death on the wood of the Holy Cross to redeem mankind, it is up to each person to avail himself of the merits of Our Lord’s Redemptive Act. Actually, of course, the number of those who are saved is very few:

Woe to you who command others! If so many are damned by your fault, what will happen to you? If few out of those who are first in the Church of God are saved, what will happen to you? Take all states, both sexes, every condition: husbands, wives, widows, young women, young men, soldiers, merchants, craftsmen, rich and poor, noble and plebian. What are we to say about all these people who are living so badly? The following narrative from Saint Vincent Ferrer will show you what you may think about it. He relates that an archdeacon in Lyons gave up his charge and retreated into a desert place to do penance, and that he died the same day and hour as Saint Bernard. After his death, he appeared to his bishop and said to him, "Know, Monsignor, that at the very hour I passed away, thirty-three thousand people also died. Out of this number, Bernard and myself went up to heaven without delay, three went to purgatory, and all the others fell into Hell."

Our chronicles relate an even more dreadful happening. One of our brothers, well-known for his doctrine and holiness, was preaching in Germany. He represented the ugliness of the sin of impurity so forcefully that a woman fell dead of sorrow in front of everyone. Then, coming back to life, she said, "When I was presented before the Tribunal of God, sixty thousand people arrived at the same time from all parts of the world; out of that number, three were saved by going to Purgatory, and all the rest were damned."

O abyss of the judgments of God! Out of thirty thousand, only five were saved! And out of sixty thousand, only three went to heaven! You sinners who are listening to me, in what category will you be numbered?... What do you say?... What do you think?...

I see almost all of you lowering your heads, filled with astonishment and horror. But let us lay our stupor aside, and instead of flattering ourselves, let us try to draw some profit from our fear.

Is it not true that there are two roads which lead to heaven: innocence and repentance? Now, if I show you that very few take either one of these two roads, as rational people you will conclude that very few are saved. And to mention proofs: in what age, employment or condition will you find that the number of the wicked is not a hundred times greater than that of the good, and about which one might say, "The good are so rare and the wicked are so great in number"? We could say of our times  what Salvianus said of his: it is easier to find a countless multitude of sinners immersed in all sorts of iniquities than a few innocent men. How many servants are totally honest and faithful in their duties? How many merchants are fair and equitable in their commerce; how many craftsmen exact and truthful; how many salesmen disinterested and sincere? How many men of law do not forsake equity? How many soldiers do not tread upon innocence; how many masters do not unjustly withhold the salary of those who serve them, or do not seek to dominate their inferiors? Everywhere, the good are rare and the wicked great in number. Who does not know that today there is so much libertinage among mature men, liberty among young girls, vanity among women, licentiousness in the nobility, corruption in the middle class, dissolution in the people, impudence among the poor, that one could say what David said of his times: "All alike have gone astray... there is not even one who does good, not even one." (Saint Leonard of Port Maurice, The Little Number of Those Who Are Saved.)

These are words that should terrify each one of us. The spiritually lax and outright moral reprobates do not enter the Kingdom of God. We must pray to Our Lady every day to help us to save our souls as it is far easier to go to Hell for all eternity than it is to go to Heaven. The conciliar revolutionaries preach the exact opposite.

The standard of one’s Particular Judgment becomes higher if he has authority over others. One duly invested with the authority to govern must do so justly as he seeks to foster the common temporal good in light of man’s Last End, namely, the possession of the Beatific Vision of God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Ghost for all eternity in Heaven. Yes, woe to those who govern who do not make provision for the eternal well-being of those entrusted to their governance.

Pope Saint Pius X summarized the entirety of the duties of just governance and statecraft as he condemned the Protestant and Judeo-Masonic precept of the “separation of Church and State” in Paragraph Three of Vehementer Nos, February 11, 1906:

That the State must be separated from the Church is a thesis absolutely false, a most pernicious error. Based, as it is, on the principle that the State must not recognize any religious cult, it is in the first place guilty of a great injustice to God; for the Creator of man is also the Founder of human societies, and preserves their existence as He preserves our own. We owe Him, therefore, not only a private cult, but a public and social worship to honor Him. Besides, this thesis is an obvious negation of the supernatural order. It limits the action of the State to the pursuit of public prosperity during this life only, which is but the proximate object of political societies; and it occupies itself in no fashion (on the plea that this is foreign to it) with their ultimate object which is man's eternal happiness after this short life shall have run its course. But as the present order of things is temporary and subordinated to the conquest of man's supreme and absolute welfare, it follows that the civil power must not only place no obstacle in the way of this conquest, but must aid us in effecting it. The same thesis also upsets the order providentially established by God in the world, which demands a harmonious agreement between the two societies. Both of them, the civil and the religious society, although each exercises in its own sphere its authority over them. It follows necessarily that there are many things belonging to them in common in which both societies must have relations with one another. Remove the agreement between Church and State, and the result will be that from these common matters will spring the seeds of disputes which will become acute on both sides; it will become more difficult to see where the truth lies, and great confusion is certain to arise. Finally, this thesis inflicts great injury on society itself, for it cannot either prosper or last long when due place is not left for religion, which is the supreme rule and the sovereign mistress in all questions touching the rights and the duties of men. Hence the Roman Pontiffs have never ceased, as circumstances required, to refute and condemn the doctrine of the separation of Church and State. Our illustrious predecessor, Leo XIII, especially, has frequently and magnificently expounded Catholic teaching on the relations which should subsist between the two societies. "Between them," he says, "there must necessarily be a suitable union, which may not improperly be compared with that existing between body and soul.-"Quaedam intercedat necesse est ordinata colligatio (inter illas) quae quidem conjunctioni non immerito comparatur, per quam anima et corpus in homine copulantur." He proceeds: "Human societies cannot, without becoming criminal, act as if God did not exist or refuse to concern themselves with religion, as though it were something foreign to them, or of no purpose to them.... As for the Church, which has God Himself for its author, to exclude her from the active life of the nation, from the laws, the education of the young, the family, is to commit a great and pernicious error. (Pope Saint Pius X, Vehementer Nos, February 11, 1906.)

Human societies have, sadly, become criminal because most people, including those who govern, do indeed “act as if God did not exist or refuse to concern themselves with religion.” The consequences of such disorder are deadly to men and their nations. As has been noted many times previously in this website, we are witnessing the perfection of the inherent degeneracy of the false, naturalistic, Pelagian and religiously indifferentist principles of the American founding. Disorder in the souls of men leads to disorder in one’s nation and hence in the world. No nation will ever know a just social order domestically and the world-at-large will never enjoy a genuine peace as long most men are at war with the true God of Divine Revelation, the Most Blessed Trinity, by means of unrepented sins and by enshrining grave sins as a “civil right” in public law and celebrating them throughout the nooks and crannies of “popular culture.”

As Silvio Cardinal Antoniano noted in the Sixteenth Century:

The more closely the temporal power of a nation aligns itself with the spiritual, and the more it fosters and promotes the latter, by so much the more it contributes to the conservation of the commonwealth. For it is the aim of the ecclesiastical authority by the use of spiritual means, to form good Christians in accordance with its own particular end and object; and in doing this it helps at the same time to form good citizens, and prepares them to meet their obligations as members of a civil society. This follows of necessity because in the City of God, the Holy Roman Catholic Church, a good citizen and an upright man are absolutely one and the same thing. How grave therefore is the error of those who separate things so closely united, and who think that they can produce good citizens by ways and methods other than those which make for the formation of good Christians. For, let human prudence say what it likes and reason as it pleases, it is impossible to produce true temporal peace and tranquillity by things repugnant or opposed to the peace and happiness of eternity. (Silvio Cardinal Antoniano, quoted by Pope Pius XI in Divini Illius Magistri, December 31, 1929.)

No, no one on the naturalist "right" understands this, which makes it impossible to turn back the tide of evil advance by their opposite numbers among the ranks of the naturalist "left," most of whom are proud to boast of their support for the very evils that undermine justice in their nations and peace in the world.

Pope Leo XIII, writing in Immortale Dei, November 1, 1885, taught that it is impossible to produce a just social order if the civil law permits all kinds of licentiousness:

Whatever, therefore, is opposed to virtue and truth may not rightly be brought temptingly before the eye of man, much less sanctioned by the favor and protection of the law. A well-spent life is the only way to heaven, whither all are bound, and on this account the State is acting against the laws and dictates of nature whenever it permits the license of opinion and of action to lead minds astray from truth and souls away from the practice of virtue. To exclude the Church, founded by God Himself, from life, from laws, from the education of youth, from domestic society is a grave and fatal error. A State from which religion is banished can never be well regulated; and already perhaps more than is desirable is known of the nature and tendency of the so-called civil philosophy of life and morals. The Church of Christ is the true and sole teacher of virtue and guardian of morals. She it is who preserves in their purity the principles from which duties flow, and, by setting forth most urgent reasons for virtuous life, bids us not only to turn away from wicked deeds, but even to curb all movements of the mind that are opposed to reason, even though they be not carried out in action. (Pope Leo XIII, Immortale Dei, November 1, 1885.)

As has been noted on this website so many hundreds upon hundreds of times, the world is a mess because fallen men have rejected the infallible voice of Holy Mother Church ever since Martin Luther’s revolution against the Divine Plan that God Himself instituted to effect man’s return to Him through His Catholic Church, and it has been accelerating down into the abyss these past sixty years because we have lacked the Principle of Unity represented by a true and legitimate Successor of Saint Peter. There is confusion even within sedevacantist circles because of the lack of the Universal Pastor to guide us all.

In case you have not noticed, we are in the midst of a chastisement that shows no sign of abating. Although I, for one, pray for a mitigation of this chastisement, I know that this chastisement, as terrible as it is in all of its dreadful details, is what we deserve for our lukewarmness, our worldliness, and for the general belief held by so many Catholics that politics and elections provide the key to “saving” the nation. They are not. We must first seek to save our own immortal souls by making reparation for our sins as we pray for the conversion of others to the true Faith, outside of which there is no salvation and without which there can be no true and enduring social order.

What most people alive today, including many poorly formed Catholics within the conciliar structures, do not understand is that there is no need to fear even genuine outbreaks of disease and/or the exploitation of such outbreaks by statists intent on the institutionalization of a Red Chinese-style dictatorship in partnership with Big Pharma, Big Tech, Big Ag, Big Banking, Big Show Business, Big Sports, Big Law, Big Media, Big Education, Big Everything Bad and Immoral.

Why fear disease?

The frailty of the human body is a consequence of Original Sin. Suffering is the path to Heaven, and each of us must suffer because each of us is a sinner and must repay the temporal debt that we owe God for our forgiven Mortal Sins, our Venial Sins, and any attachment we might have to our sins. Even though have walked more perfectly along the path of perfection by cooperating lovingly with the graces Our Lady has sent to them must suffer so as to be even more perfected than they have become and to help make reparation for the sins of others and to effect their conversion to the Catholic Faith if non-Catholic or their return to the Sacred Tribunal of Penance and the practice of the Holy Faith if baptized therein.

Although our civil minders and the mad scientists whom they have empowered believe that they can eradicate disease by an endless success of vaccines and the aggressive use of “comfort care” to “ease out” the diseased made sick by all manner of nutritional, mineral and vitamin deficiencies caused by Big Ag’s overly processed foods and the effects of Big Pharma’s drugs that make sick people even sicker and thus more dependent upon their products, we know that they will fail in the “Project Immorality” as no one is as foolish as those who think that they can ape the Omnipotence and Omniscience of the true God of Divine Revelation, the Most Holy Trinity.

This will sound trite because I have written this over a thousand times of this website, but I will write it again anew: there is nothing we can suffer—there  is nothing anyone can say about us, post about, write about us, gossip about us, attack us physically, nothing—that is the equal of what one of our least Venial Sins caused the Second Person of the Most Blessed Trinity made Man in Our Lady’s Virginal and Immaculate Womb by the power of the Third Person of the Most Blessed Trinity, God the Holy Ghost, at the Annunciation of Our Lady to suffer in His Sacred Humanity during His Passion and Death on the wood of the Holy Cross on Good Friday and that caused His Most Blessed Mother to suffer in perfect compassion with Him as our Co-Redemptrix.

Those who manufactured and who are continuing to exploit the so-called “pandemic” are thus helping us get home to Heaven IF we offer up the sufferings they are imposing upon and pray for their conversion.

This does not mean that we must not oppose them and try to expose them and their schemes. Of course not! One of the best ways in situations such as we face at this time to correct malefactors is oppose them vigorously and to denounce their words and actions for what they are. Doing this is a Spiritual Work of Mercy as our opposition to their lies and nefarious schemes is an effort to admonish the sinner, noting as well that we also have a civic duty to oppose such evils for the establishment of a just social order.

Alas, a just social order can only be established on the basis of the Catholic Faith—the true Catholic Faith, not the conciliar variety—if men convert, quit their sins and seek to make reparation for them. Until this happens, though, we must bear our share of hardship which the Gospel entails as we remember that this is the time that God has known from all eternity that we would be living, meaning that this is the time that He has chosen for us to be alive and to work out our salvation in fear and trembling as members of His Holy Catholic Church.

There is no ruing the fact that we are alive at this time as to lament the realities of the world in which we live to is rebel against the ineffable wisdom of the Providence of God and to cast away the graces He sends to us through the loving hands of Our Lady, she who is the Mediatrix of All Graces, with which we are meant to sanctify and save our immoral souls, which have been redeemed at so great a cost, the cost of the shedding of every single drop of Our Divine Redeemer, Christ the King, as He paid back in His own Sacred Humanity the debt of sin that was owed to Him in His Infinity as God in all the sacred events of the Paschal Triduum we will be calling to mind and celebrating liturgically during next week, the very week of weeks, Holy Week.

It is one of the most firmly established and most consoling of the truths that have been revealed to us that (apart from sin) nothing happens to us in life unless God wills it so. Wealth and poverty alike come from Him. If we fall ill, God is the cause of our illness; if we get well, our recovery is due to God. We owe our lives entirely to Him, and when death comes to put an end to life, His will be the hand that deals the blow.

But should we attribute it to God when we are unjustly persecuted? Yes, He is the only person you can charge with the wrong you suffer. He is not the cause of the sin the person commits by ill-treating you, but He is the cause of the suffering that person inflicts on you while sinning. God did not inspire your enemy with the will to harm you, but He gave him the power to do so. If you receive a wound, do not doubt but that it is God Himself who has wounded you. If all living creatures were to league themselves against you, unless the Creator wished it and joined with them and gave them the strength and means to carry out their purpose, they would never succeed. You would have no power over me if it had not been given you from above, the Savior of the world said to Pilate. We can say the same to demons and men, to the brute beasts and to whatever exists — You would not be able to disturb me or harm me as you do unless God had ordered it so. You are sent by Him, you are given the power by Him to tempt me and to make me suffer. You would have no power over me if it had not been given you from above.

If from time to time we meditated seriously on this truth of our faith it would be enough to stifle all complaint in whatever loss or misfortune we suffer. What I have the Lord gave me, it has been taken away by Him. It is not a lawsuit or a thief that has ruined you or a certain person that has slandered you; if your child dies it is not by accident or wrong treatment, but because God, to whom all belongs, has not wished you to keep it longer.  (Blessed Father Claude de la Colombiere, S.J., Trustful Surrender to Divine Providence, p. 40, as found online at: Trustful Surrender to Divine Providence.)

Conscious of our need to make reparation for our sins, which are far more deadly than the coronavirus--or any sickness for that matter-- as the consecrated slaves of Christ the King through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary, may the Rosaries we pray each day to console the good God in this time of apostasy and betrayal help to plant a few seeds for the Triumph of the same Immaculate Heart of Mary when a true pope is restored to the Throne of Saint Peter and fulfills her Fatima Peace Plan consecrates Russia, thus ceasing the spread of the errors we see so manifest before us today, with all of the world's bishops to this very heart out of which the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus was formed and with which it beats as one.

The following prayer, which has a plenary indulgenced attached to it and is found in The Raccolta, is one that I pray every day for the restoration of all things in Christ the King:

O Christ Jesus, I acknowledge Thee to be the King of the universe: all that hat been made is created for Thee. Exercise over me all Thy sovereign rights. I hereby renew the promises of my Baptism, renouncing Satan and all his works and pomps, and I engage myself to lead henceforth a truly Christian life. And in an especial manner do I undertake to bring about the triumph of the rights of God and Thy Church, so far as me in lies. Divine Heart of Jesus, I offer Thee my poor actions to obtain the acknowledgment by every heart of Thy sacred kingly power. In such wise may the kingdom of thy peace be firmly established upon the earth. Amen. (The Raccolta: A Manual of Indulgences, Prayers and Devotions Enriched with Indulgences, approved by Pope Pius XII, May 30, 1951, and published in English by Benziger Brothers, New York, 1957, No. 272, p. 189. A plenary indulgence on the usual conditions once daily, S.P., Ap., February 21, 1923.)

May each Rosary we pray help to bring this miracle that the devil fears and for which we must be uncompromising in working to achieve as soldiers in the Army of Christ so that we will not be crushed by the weight of the errors of Russia, which are the errors of Modernity and Modernism, now and quite possibly, for all eternity.

Our Lady of the Sorrows, pray for us.

Saint Joseph, pray for us.

Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.

Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.

Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Jude, pray for us.

Saint John the Beloved, pray for us.

Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.

Saints Caspar, Melchior, and Balthazar, pray for us.

Appendix A

Confirmed Cases in Europe of the Deaths of Children and Teenagers Caused by the Pfizer and mRNA Vaccines

by Dr. Robert Malone

When trying to catch up with my various WhatsApp messages, I found that I had missed one from a journalist who I met in Portugal almost two years ago, when I was speaking to a small group of Lisbon-based free thinking influencers including physicians, lawyers, politicians and of course journalists. The Portuguese journalist Elizabete Tavares had moderated a discussion panel during one of these sessions, and two months ago she had written to alert me to a publication from her new journalistic home, the independent journal publication “Pagina UM”.

Hi Dr. Robert:

This is Elisabete Tavares. I’m the journalist that moderated the talk you attended in Lisbon in 2021. I’m working with an independent Portuguese newspaper, Pagina UM. We have published today a detailed account of the deaths of children and teenagers in Europe due to the COVID mRNA vaccine. Here is the news in case you want to read and share.

Unfortunately, the reporting is only published in Portuguese, but the topic looked important so I asked her if it would be acceptable for me to run this through a machine translation program and re-publish in English. Plus, Jill and I are always keen to bring international perspectives to our Substack readers. Permission granted!

For those fluent in Portuguese, the original Portuguese version of this article can be found here.

So, without further ado, below please find a machine translated version of the forwarded article.

Reporting by Pedro Almeida Vieira // January 27, 2023

Pagina UM (Portugal)

Covid-19: Pfizer vaccine suspected of killing 125 young Europeans, the overwhelming majority (were) healthy

PÁGINA UM began to analyze, in detail, the database of the European Medicines Agency, while waiting for the Administrative Court to oblige (or not) Infarmed to disclose the notifications of adverse effects in Portugal of vaccines against covid-19. In the individual records of the most serious cases in Europe – which resulted in the deaths of children and young people–, and which PÁGINA UM presents exclusively, it is not intended to satisfy any morbid curiosity. The disturbance that reading can cause should lead to an immediate question: were these victims necessary, in concrete terms, as collateral damage, in a disease that, for people under 20 years of age, causes three deaths in every 1,000,000 infections? And this includes those with serious comorbidities, because in the case of victims of the adverse effects of vaccines, the overwhelming majority were healthy, which would give them, with absolute statistical certainty, the ability to survive an infection caused by SARS-CoV-2.

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has already received and validated a total of 125 deaths of children and adolescents in which there are very strong suspicions of direct association with the mRNA vaccine, produced by Pfizer-BioNTech, marketed under the brand name Comirnaty. This number comes from a detailed analysis – and still ongoing – that PÁGINA UM is carrying out on the EudraVigilance database, which compiles notifications from the pharmaceutical industry itself and from regulators in different countries, including Infarmed.

In the most recent update of the safety information, on December 8 last year, the EMA reports that around 57.3 million doses have already been administered to children and adolescents (under 18 years of age) – which indicates approximately 30 million vaccinated in these age groups – but not a word or a number about deaths and serious adverse effects.

This Pfizer vaccine was the only one allowed to be used in Portugal. In addition to this, in Europe, according to the EMA, around 3.1 million doses of Spikevax, Moderna's vaccine, were administered to children and adolescents. PAGE ONE has not yet reviewed the adverse effects of Spikevax in these age groups.

Only a detailed query of the EudraVigilance database – not very intuitive and requiring further data analysis – allows individual records to be obtained (anonymized and without country identification) and a rigorous determination of the adverse effects of vaccines against covid -19.

In addition to the 125 deaths, more than 11,500 adverse reactions considered serious were reported, just for this Pfizer vaccine and last year alone, of which around 9,000 in the 12 to 17 age group. Knowing how many cases resulted in hospitalization and sequelae is a very difficult task, not least because of the lack of information contained in the individual records made available. On the other hand, the EMA database is structured in a way that makes finer analyzes difficult.

It should be noted, however, that all notifications of deaths contained in EudraVigilance were made by health professionals, which reinforces the strong suspicion that the vaccine is the exclusive “promoter” of the fatal outcome. Even because the notification must always contain the suspected drug.

Incidentally, curiously, 97 of the 125 reports of deaths of children and young people were even indicated by Pfizer, which did not respond to a request for information and clarification from PÁGINA UM. The reason seems simple: as vaccines against covid-19 had a special emergency status, granted by international institutions, relieving pharmaceutical companies of responsibilities, Pfizer (and any other company that markets them) will only have any future problems if they hide intentionally some relevant information. In any case, the American pharmaceutical company would never indicate these 97 deaths of children and young people if it did not have a high degree of certainty that they were caused by its vaccine.

But from there to having an active attitude of prudence and public reporting on real adverse events, especially in groups without vulnerabilities (such as healthy children and young people), goes a long way. Pfizer never spoke of deaths of young people and children, presenting its vaccine as safe and even necessary in a cost-benefit analysis. And the political and health authorities signed on underneath.

In fact, the reduced number of lethal cases reported by regulators in different countries is rather strange, bearing in mind that institutional health authorities have the greatest technical (and even legal) capacity to deepen diagnoses and forensic medical examinations to determine the actual cause of death and confirm beyond doubt the association with vaccines. However, it is no less evident that health authorities, linked to Governments, will not be very politically interested in proving (with scientific evidence) any type of relationship between vaccines against covid-19 and the death of children and adolescents, especially because strong persuasion (or even pressure) campaigns were set up for parents to vaccinate their children.

What is certain is that the information made available on its website by the EMA for each fatal case contains incomprehensibly few relevant clinical details – it ignores, for example, the period between administration of the vaccine and death –, whether the information on hospitalizations (or not) ) is correct, nor is it evident that there were autopsies and post mortem diagnoses.

However, it becomes evident in this analysis of the official information available, that in the overwhelming majority of cases we are facing tragic outcomes in healthy young people, since, as a rule, there are no other drugs under suspicion. Indeed, among the 125 deaths recorded in the Pfizer vaccine, only in 16 cases were other drugs involved, although in some situations it appears that, when mentioned, they were used during hospitalizations.

In total, most deaths are among boys: 67 against 58 girls. And the most representative group – and also the largest because it was more vaccinated – is that of adolescents between 12 and 17 years old, with 93 deaths. While it is certain that in some of these tragic events only general symptoms are highlighted – such as fever, weakness, vomiting and diarrhea –, which do not even allow the assessment of the “impact” of the vaccine, in other situations the clinical events identified refer to specific conditions that have been concern. These include heart problems, and especially myocarditis.

In fact, in a global analysis of the adverse effects of Comirnaty over the past year, Pfizer highlights the detection of 1,028 myocarditis as serious cases. Of the 13 that contributed to death, according to the records consulted by PÁGINA UM, 10 were observed in boys and three in girls, which confirms the indications of several studies on this matter.

But there are still other disturbing data – and which should lead to reflection on ethical issues, among which the possibility of causing adverse effects, even if in a minimal probability, for a person who is not vulnerable to a disease.

In fact, in all the cases described below – and even more in some than in others – it is disconcerting to imagine the evolution of the health status of those children and adolescents who ended up being stroked. And some literally, like the eight who suffered an acute myocardial infarction or the five who died suddenly.

And this, it seems, was due to the administration of a drug that promised to save them from a disease that, for their age, had a fatality rate of 0.0003% without a vaccine – as confirmed by a recent study published this month. in a scientific journal, co-authored by John Ioannidis, the world's leading epidemiologist.

INDIVIDUAL (ANONYMIZED) RECORDS OF DEATHS IN THE COUNTRIES OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA DUE TO SUSPECTED ADVERSE EFFECTS OF THE PFIZER-BIONTECH VACCINE (COMIRNATY)

1

Registration No. EU-EC-10014311323

Male

Age range: 12-17 years old

Date: 12/26/2022

Event after vaccination: Dyspnoea and arthralgia

Associated medication: No

Notifying Entity: Pfizer

2

Registration No. EU-EC-10014312032

Male

Age range: 12-17 years old

Date: 12/26/2022

Event after vaccination: Malaise and fever

Associated medication: No

Notifying Entity: Pfizer

3

Registration No. EU-EC-10014282015

Male

Age range: 12-17 years old

Date: 12/21/2022

Event after vaccination: Myocarditis and cardiac arrest

Associated medication: No

Notifying entity: Regulator

4

Registration No. EU-EC-10014261879

Male

Age range: 12-17 years old

Date: 12/19/2022

Event after vaccination: Cerebral edema and viral encephalitis

Associated medication: No

Notifying entity: Regulator

5

Registration No. EU-EC-10014176692

Male

Age range: 2 months-2 years

Date: 12/6/2022

Post-vaccination event: Pallor, pulmonary edema, and pneumonia

Associated medication: No

Notifying Entity: Pfizer

6

Registration No. EU-EC-10014162125

Women

Age range: 12-17 years old

Date: 12/2/2022

Event after vaccination: Erythema, fever and pain. Indication of problem in the administration of the vaccine (Inappropriate schedule of vaccine administered)

Associated medication: No

Notifying Entity: Pfizer

7

Registration No. EU-EC-10014121005

Male

Age range: 3-11 years old

Date: 11/28/2022

Event after vaccination: Hepatorenal syndrome, encephalopathy, cerebral hernia, cerebral edema, sepsis, and organ failure

Associated medication: Yes (six medications; asthmatic patient)

Notifying Entity: Pfizer

8

Registration No. EU-EC-10014002719

Women

Age range: 12-17 years old

Date: 11/15/2022

Event after vaccination: Pulmonary embolism

Associated medication: Yes (drugs due to absence of menstruation)

Notifying entity: Regulator

9

Registration No. EU-EC-10013880205

Women

Age range: 12-17 years old

Date: 10/31/2022

Event after vaccination: Extreme weakness

Associated medication: No

Notifying Entity: Pfizer

10

Registration No. EU-EC-10013825344

Male

Age range: 12-17 years old

Date: 10/24/2022

Event after vaccination: Acute myocardial infarction

Associated medication: No

Notifying Entity: Pfizer

11

Registration No. EU-EC-10013792211

Male

Age range: 12-17 years old

Date: 10/20/2022

Event after vaccination: Fatigue, sensory disturbances, dyspnoea, pain and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Indication of vaccination error (Vaccination error)

Associated medication: No

Notifying Entity: Pfizer

12

Registration No. EU-EC-10013741937

Women

Age range: 12-17 years old

Date: 10/14/2022

Event after vaccination: Chronic asthma and covid-19

Associated medication: No

Notifying Entity: Pfizer

13

Registration No. EU-EC-10013705185

Women

Age range: 12-17 years old

Date: 10/10/2022

Event after vaccination: Convulsions

Associated medication: Yes (two medications for bipolar disorder and epilepsy, which is also suspected)

Notifying entity: UCB Pharma

14

Registration No. EU-EC-10013551143

Women

Age range: 12-17 years old

Date: 9/20/2022

Event after vaccination: Dyspnoea, circulatory shock and acute myocardial infarction

Associated medication: Yes (two asthma medications)

Notifying Entity: Pfizer

15

Registration No. EU-EC-10013537492

Women

Age range: 3-11 years old

Date: 9/19/2022

Event after vaccination: Unknown

Associated medication: No

Notifying Entity: Pfizer (Covid-19: Pfizer vaccine suspected of killing 125 young Europeans, the overwhelming majority (were) healthy.)

Appendix B

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation’s Polio Vaccine  Paralyzes Seven Children

Seven children were paralyzed by vaccine-derived polio linked to the new nOPV2 polio vaccine developed by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, according to health officials in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Burundi and the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI), which on Thursday announced the news.

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, a GPEI partner, funded the development and clinical trials for the nOPV2 vaccine.

Burundi declared a national emergency after confirming eight cases of the virus and five samples from environmental surveillance of wastewater, the World Health Organization (WHO) said in a statement.

The country plans to implement a polio vaccination campaign in the coming weeks, aiming to vaccinate all eligible children, ages 0 to 7, against the virus.

Burundi health authorities also plan to work with the WHO and GPEI to do risk assessments to determine the extent of the outbreak of the vaccine-derived virus.

And they are increasing polio surveillance, with WHO employees collecting additional water samples and possibly opening new environmental surveillance sites.

“We are disappointed,” said Dr. Ananda Bandyopadhyay, deputy director for technology, research and analytics on the Gates Foundation polio team. “Any such outbreak is disappointing,” he said, according to a Stat News report.

Vaccine-derived polio outbreaks are not a surprise with the nOPV2 vaccine, GPEI said. “While detection of these outbreaks is a tragedy for the families and communities affected, it is not unexpected with wider use of the vaccine,” it said on its website.

The oral vaccines, administered in much of Africa, the Middle East and parts of Asia, contain a live-but-weakened form of the polio virus modified to minimize its ability to paralyze.

Children vaccinated with the live oral vaccines shed the virus in their stool, which eventually ends up in sewage wastewater. Particularly in places where sanitation is poor, the virus can move from child to child, which, GPEI said, is actually the point.

The viruses can move from person to person and “actually help protect the community” it says on its website.

However, as it continues to circulate over the course of 12 to 18 months, the attenuated virus in the live oral vaccine strains can revert to virulence, circulate, infect and paralyze “in places with low immunization rates.”

These viruses are called circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus, or cVDPV.

Afghanistan and Pakistan now report more cases of paralysis from vaccine-derived polio than from the wild virus, and there have been several outbreaks of vaccine-derived infections across Africa, with more than 1,000 children paralyzed in 2020 alone, according to a study in the BMJ.

In 2022, 800 children developed paralytic polio from the vaccines.

Why live virus vaccines?

The oral polio vaccines (OPV) used in much of the developing world are different from those given in the U.S. and some western countries, which use the inactivated (dead) polio vaccine (IPV) developed by Dr. Jonas Salk and first used in 1955, when polio became a global concern.

According to the WHO, it’s only in “very rare cases,” that the administration of OPV results in vaccine-derived paralytic polio.

In addition to causing vaccine-associated paralytic polio, vaccine strains have the capacity to cause disease of the nervous system and to transmit from person to person, resulting in infectious poliomyelitis, The Defender reported.

The U.S. stopped using OPV in 2000 because it caused paralytic polio.

Albert Sabin developed the OPV in 1962. The ease of administering the oral vaccine made it the “ideal candidate for mass vaccination campaigns,” according to the WHO. It also stops virus transmission, which the IPV vaccine does not.

As GPEI’s global campaign to eradicate polio, begun in 1988, has progressed, the use of the oral vaccine has created many incidents of the spread of the vaccine-derived viruses.

Of the three original strains of wild polio, types 2 and 3 were declared eradicated and only type 1 has not. The portion of the Sabin vaccines targeting type 2 viruses triggers the vast majority of vaccine-derived polio cases.

This problem and the fact that type 2 polio hasn’t been seen since 1999, led the polio program to stop using trivalent vaccines (targeting three types of polio) in all 155 countries administering OPV vaccines 2016, replacing them with bivalent OPVs.

But that decision, called “the switch,” made children more susceptible to vaccine-derived polio viruses — and the numbers of children infected with those viruses began to grow.

GPEI responded by creating a new monovalent OPV vaccine that targets type 2 polio viruses and administering them in places where the virus is circulating.

Instead of resolving the problem, the number of type 2 vaccine-derived outbreaks in Africa almost tripled from 2018 to 2019, and fear of outbreaks around the world grew because so many children were not immune to type 2 polio.

Simultaneously, GPEI/Gates rushed to develop new OPVs that would make the virus less prone to the mutations that created problems, The Defender reported.

The new nOPV2 vaccine that caused the recent outbreaks was granted Emergency Use Listing by the WHO in November 2020, and the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (SAGE) recommended Gates’ nOPV2 become the “vaccine of choice” for responding to type 2 polio outbreaks caused by OPV.

But the nOPV2 also now is associated with vaccine-related polio outbreaks.

Vaccines nOPV for types 1 and 3 poliovirus, called nOPV1 and nOPV3, are in clinical trials, according to EPGI.

In an email to The Defender, Dr. Brian Hooker, Ph.D., P.E., Children’s Health Defense chief scientific officer and professor of biology at Simpson University said:

“It is tragic but not unexpected that the use of live virus Sabin vaccines would cause the spread of vaccine-derived polio given the propensity of these viruses to back-mutate into their paralytic form.

“It is even more alarming that the paralytic form is now circulating among the population of the Congo’s and Burundi’s children.”

GPEI said 600 million doses of the new vaccine were administered in 28 countries since March 2021, and reiterated that the vaccine was “safe and effective.”

Gates’ and Polio

The Gates Foundation is the topmost funder of polio initiatives worldwide. In April 2013, Bill Gates said that eradicating polio was his “top priority,” — even though there had only been 19 cases worldwide that entire year at that point.

Since Gates made that commitment, billions of dollars worldwide have been poured into the cause.

The Gates Foundation is one of several partners in the GPEI public-private partnership that also includes the WHO, UNICEF, the United Nations Children’s Fund, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Gavi and Rotary International.

The Gates Foundation, in addition to funding the nPOV2 vaccine, GPEI and the WHO, also funds Rotary International, UNICEF, Gavi and the CDC Foundation.

As The Defender reported:

“In essence, the Gates Foundation funded the creation, development and clinical trials for the new nPOV2 polio vaccine, funds the organizations that administered millions of doses to be given under EUL without any long-term data, funds the organizations implementing its roll-out and surveillance and funds the entity monitoring adverse events associated with nPOV2’s use.

“The Gates Foundation is also a funder of NPR and NPR’s blog, which have published numerous articles on VDPV2 and paved the way for Gates’ nPOV2 vaccine as the solution.”

Critics, including sociologist Linsey McGoey and many scientists working in low-income settings have noted that as money is lavished on polio, millions of children are left vulnerable to a slew of often deadly, preventable diseases.

That’s because Gates funding not only funnels money into this single issue — or whatever single issue the foundation is interested in at any given time — but the terms of its grants often require commitments of funding, personnel and other resources from recipient nations.

As a result, the continued focus on polio is disproportionate to the need, diverting resources from other health issues and diseases, according to Robert Fortner, freelance science journalist, writing in the BMJ.

For example, Dr. Oliver Razum, an epidemiologist at the University of Bielefeld, Germany pointed to India, where the “sheer number of [Gates-funded polio] doses that had to be distributed,” twice a year, literally left no space in refrigerators for other vaccines against diseases such as measles.

Fortner also reported that polio funds from the Gates Foundation have led to local “brain drains,” with doctors, researchers and practitioners moved into eradication and away from local and locally funded health priorities.

Even The Lancet published a similar critique of Gates back in 2009.

Dr. Richard Horton, editor-in-chief wrote in an editorial that, “Grants made by the Foundation do not reflect the burden of disease endured by those in deepest poverty,” and there is an “alarmingly poor correlation between the Foundation’s funding and childhood disease priorities.”

“Important health programmes are being distorted by large grants from the Gates Foundation,” Horton said, adding, “There is also a serious anxiety about the transparency of the Foundation’s operation.”

In the wake of the Gates Foundation’s role in the COVID-19 epidemic, many more people express similar concerns today. (7 Children Paralyzed by Polio Virus Derived From New Gates-Funded Polio Vaccine.)