Sodomy is Shameful, Not a Source of Perverted "Pride" to be Celebrated

We entered the month of June, the month of the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus, three days ago, that is, on Sunday, June 1, 2025, the Sunday within the Octave of the Ascension of Our Lord and the Commemoration of Saint Angela Merici. This is the time to display our devotion to the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus in a very visible and, if possible, even public manner.

Indeed, I remember going to a barber in Texas during our nine years in the Lone Star State who was not a Catholic. However, he had an image of the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus above the counter where he kept his barbering equipment.

The barber, who was an independently wealthy rancher whose barbering (which was not that good, which is why I stopped going to him after about two years of getting uneven haircuts) was a sideline to his ranching. The barbering permitted him to keep tabs on local politics quite in the manner of the fictional Floyd Lawson on The Andy Griffith Show, but I asked him why he displayed the image of the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus in his shop given that he was not a Catholic.

“I don’t know,” the barber said. “One of my customers gave the image to me and I just thought it would be good to hang it on the wall. The Catholic who gave it to me said that he would bring me many blessings.”

Imagine if more Catholics had such a desire to display images of the Sacred Heart of Jesus as a manifestation of their Catholic Faith, doing so to taunt no one else but solely for the love of Our Divine King and Redeemer. Unlike Our Lady’s Most Holy Rosary, which is our spiritual weapon, the image of the Sacred Heart of Jesus is meant to remind us of what It suffered for our sins and thus to inspire within us and others both a deep gratitude to Our Lord for all that He underwent during His fearful Passion and Death on the wood of the Holy Cross on Good Friday and to call us to have a deep hatred of sin and a firm resolve to make reparation for our sins as His consecrated slaves through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary.

As we know, of course, this month of the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus has been coopted by the adversary and his minions to inspire those steeped in their freely chosen lives of perverse sins against Holy Purity to express their “pride” for being so steeped or, as many sodomites would claim, to express their “pride” for being “born the way” that God made them even though God does not “make” anyone to become a practitioner of the sins and vices associated with sodomy, one of the four sins that cry out to Heaven for vengeance.

The late, venal, and thoroughly morally, doctrinally and liturgically corrupt Jorge Mario Bergoglio, however, far from expression his revulsion at sins of perverse vice, enabled and emboldened such sins and those who commit them as explained time and again that sodomites are “made that way” by God, Who, he believed, does not condemn homosexuality even though the Third Person of the Most Trinity, God the Holy Ghost, divinely the human authors of the following passages from Sacred Scripture (Moses, Saint Paul the Apostle, and Saint Jude Thaddeus) to write:

[13] If any one lie with a man as with a woman, both have committed an abomination, let them be put to death: their blood be upon them. [14] If any man after marrying the daughter, marry her mother, he hath done a heinous crime: he shall be burnt alive with them: neither shall so great an abomination remain in the midst of you. [15] He that shall copulate with any beast or cattle, dying let him die, the beast also ye shall kill. (Leviticus 20: 13-15.)

For this cause God delivered them up to shameful affections. For their women have changed the natural use into that use which is against nature. And, in like manner, the men also, leaving the natural use of the women, have burned in their lusts one towards another, men with men working that which is filthy, and receiving in themselves the recompense which was due to their error. And as they liked not to have God in their knowledge, God delivered them up to a reprobate sense, to do those things which are not convenient; Being filled with all iniquity, malice, fornication, avarice, wickedness, full of envy, murder, contention, deceit, malignity, whisperers, Detractors, hateful to God, contumelious, proud, haughty, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, foolish, dissolute, without affection, without fidelity, without mercy. Who, having known the justice of God, did not understand that they who do such things, are worthy of death; and not only they that do them, but they also that consent to them that do them. (Romans 1: 18-32.)

[9] Know you not that the unjust shall not possess the kingdom of God? Do not err: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, [10] Nor the effeminate, nor liers with mankind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor railers, nor extortioners, shall possess the kingdom of God. (1 Cor. 6: 9)

[1] Jude, the servant of Jesus Christ, and brother of James: to them that are beloved in God the Father, and preserved in Jesus Christ, and called. [2] Mercy unto you, and peace, and charity be fulfilled. [3] Dearly beloved, taking all care to write unto you concerning your common salvation, I was under a necessity to write unto you: to beseech you to contend earnestly for the faith once delivered to the saints. [4] For certain men are secretly entered in, (who were written of long ago unto this judgment,) ungodly men, turning the grace of our Lord God into riotousness, and denying the only sovereign Ruler, and our Lord Jesus Christ. [5] I will therefore admonish you, though ye once knew all things, that Jesus, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, did afterwards destroy them that believed not:

[6] And the angels who kept not their principality, but forsook their own habitation, he hath reserved under darkness in everlasting chains, unto the judgment of the great day. [7] As Sodom and Gomorrha, and the neighbouring cities, in like manner, having given themselves to fornication, and going after other flesh, were made an example, suffering the punishment of eternal fire. [8] In like manner these men also defile the flesh, and despise dominion, and blaspheme majesty. [9] When Michael the archangel, disputing with the devil, contended about the body of Moses, he durst not bring against him the judgment of railing speech, but said: The Lord command thee. [10] But these men blaspheme whatever things they know not: and what things soever they naturally know, like dumb beasts, in these they are corrupted.

[11] Woe unto them, for they have gone in the way of Cain: and after the error of Balaam they have for reward poured out themselves, and have perished in the contradiction of Core. [12] These are spots in their banquets, feasting together without fear, feeding themselves, clouds without water, which are carried about by winds, trees of the autumn, unfruitful, twice dead, plucked up by the roots, [13] Raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own confusion; wandering stars, to whom the storm of darkness is reserved for ever. [14] Now of these Enoch also, the seventh from Adam, prophesied, saying: Behold, the Lord cometh with thousands of his saints, [15] To execute judgment upon all, and to reprove all the ungodly for all the works of their ungodliness, whereby they have done ungodly, and of all the hard things which ungodly sinners have spoken against God.

[16] These are murmurers, full of complaints, walking according to their own desires, and their mouth speaketh proud things, admiring persons for gain' s sake. [17] But you, my dearly beloved, be mindful of the words which have been spoken before by the apostles of our Lord Jesus Christ, [18] Who told you, that in the last time there should come mockers, walking according to their own desires in ungodlinesses. [19] These are they, who separate themselves, sensual men, having not the Spirit. [20] But you, my beloved, building yourselves upon your most holy faith, praying in the Holy Ghost,

[21] Keep yourselves in the love of God, waiting for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ, unto life everlasting. [22] And some indeed reprove, being judged:[23] But others save, pulling them out of the fire. And on others have mercy, in fear, hating also the spotted garment which is carnal. [24] Now to him who is able to preserve you without sin, and to present you spotless before the presence of his glory with exceeding joy, in the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ,[25] To the only God our Saviour through Jesus Christ our Lord, be glory and magnificence, empire and power, before all ages, and now, and for all ages of ages. Amen. (Jude 1-25.)

There are no “loopholes” in these passages.

The so-called “biblical scholars” who believe that they can deconstruct the plain words inspired by God the Holy Ghost are abject rebels who have been anathematized by the Council of Trent:

Moreover, the same sacred and holy Synod,—considering that no small utility may accrue to the Church of God, if it be made known which out of all the Latin editions, now in circulation, of the sacred books, is to be held as authentic,—ordains and declares, that the said old and vulgate edition, which, by the lengthened usage of so many years, has been approved of in the Church, be, in public lectures, disputations, sermons and expositions, held as authentic; and that no one is to dare, or presume to reject it under any pretext whatever.

Furthermore, in order to restrain petulant spirits, It decrees, that no one, relying on his own skill, shall,—in matters of faith, and of morals pertaining to the edification of Christian doctrine, —wresting the sacred Scripture to his own senses, presume to interpret the said sacred Scripture contrary to that sense which holy mother Church,—whose it is to judge of the true sense and interpretation of the holy Scriptures,—hath held and doth hold; or even contrary to the unanimous consent of the Fathers; even though such interpretations were never (intended) to be at any time published. Contraveners shall be made known by their Ordinaries, and be punished with the penalties by law established. (Canons and Decrees of the Council of Trent.)

Thus stands condemned the efforts of James Martin and his “biblical scholars” to deconstruct the following passages of Sacred Scripture that are not in the least unclear or ambiguous.

Furthermore, Pope Leo XIII explained that no one must ever doubt the fact that the Third Person of the Most Holy Trinity, God the Holy Ghost, inspired every word of Sacred Scripture, which cannot be ignored by anyone desirous of pleasing God and saving his own immortal soul.

Hence, because the Holy Ghost employed men as His instruments, we cannot therefore say that it was these inspired instruments who, perchance, have fallen into error, and not the primary author. For, by supernatural power, He so moved and impelled them to write — He was so present to them — that the things which He ordered, and those only, they, first, rightly understood, then willed faithfully to write down, and finally expressed in apt words and with infallible truth. Otherwise, it could not be said that He was the Author of the entire Scripture. Such has always been the persuasion of the Fathers. “Therefore,” says St. Augustine, “since they wrote the things which He showed and uttered to them, it cannot be pretended that He is not the writer; for His members executed what their Head dictated.” And St. Gregory the Great thus pronounces: “Most superfluous it is to inquire who wrote these things — we loyally believe the Holy Ghost to be the Author of the book. He wrote it Who dictated it for writing; He wrote it Who inspired its execution.” (Pope Leo XIII, Providentissimus Deus, November 18, 1893.)

To take issue with the clear denunciations of sodomy contained in Holy Writ, as the nefarious “Father” James Martin, S.J., continues to do (see James Martin argues there’s no conflict between Pride Month and Sacred Heart devotion), is to blaspheme God the Holy Ghost, and Pope Benedict XV, aware that innovators were trying to deconstruct the plain words of Sacred Scripture by casting aspersions upon Saint Jerome’s translation of it into the Latin Vulgate by claiming that the holy Dalmatian’s work was unreliable.

Pope Benedict XV used a good deal of Spiritus Paraclitus, September 15, 1920, to denounce innovators who were attempting to distort Saint Jerome's body of work for their own Modernist ends. One will see in the passages below an exact description of how the conciliar "popes," including Joseph Alois Ratzinger/Benedict XVI and Jorge Mario Bergoglio, have sought to reconcile the Modernist precepts of conciliarism with the truths of Catholicism by distorting the work of various Church Fathers, Doctors and saints:

24. Nor do modern innovators stop here: they even try to claim St. Jerome as a patron of their views on the ground that he maintained that historic truth and sequence were not observed in the Bible, “precisely as things actually took place, but in accordance with what men thought at that time,” and that he even held that this was the true norm for history.[44] A strange distortion of St. Jerome’s words! He does not say that when giving us an account of events the writer was ignorant of the truth and simply adopted the false views then current; he merely says that in giving names to persons or things he followed general custom. Thus the Evangelist calls St. Joseph the father of Jesus, but what he meant by the title “father” here is abundantly clear from the whole context. For St. Jerome “the true norm of history” is this: when it is question of such appellatives (as “father,” etc), and when there is no danger or error, then a writer must adopt the ordinary forms of speech simply because such forms of speech are in ordinary use. More than this: Jerome maintains that belief in the Biblical narrative is as necessary to salvation as is belief in the doctrines of the faith; thus in his Commentary on the Epistle to Philemon he says:

“What I mean is this: Does any man believe in God the Creator? He cannot do so unless he first believe that the things written of God’s Saints are true.” He then gives examples from the Old Testament, and adds: “Now unless a man believes all these and other things too which are written of the Saints he cannot believe in the God of the Saints.”[45]

25. Thus St. Jerome is in complete agreement with St. Augustine, who sums up the general belief of Christian antiquity when he says:

Holy Scripture is invested with supreme authority by reason of its sure and momentous teachings regarding the faith. Whatever, then, it tells us of Enoch, Elias and Moses — that we believe. We do not, for instance, believe that God’s Son was born of the Virgin Mary simply because He could not otherwise have appeared in the flesh and ‘walked amongst men’ — as Faustus would have it — but we believe it simply because it is written in Scripture; and unless we believe in Scripture we can neither be Christians nor be saved.[46]

26. Then there are other assailants of Holy Scripture who misuse principles — which are only sound, if kept within due bounds — in order to overturn the fundamental truth of the Bible and thus destroy Catholic teaching handed down by the Fathers. If Jerome were living now he would sharpen his keenest controversial weapons against people who set aside what is the mind and judgment of the Church, and take too ready a refuge in such notions as “implicit quotations” or “pseudo-historical narratives,” or in “kinds of literature” in the Bible such as cannot be reconciled with the entire and perfect truth of God’s word, or who suggest such origins of the Bible as must inevitably weaken — if not destroy — its authority.

27. What can we say of men who in expounding the very Gospels so whittle away the human trust we should repose in it as to overturn Divine faith in it? They refuse to allow that the things which Christ said or did have come down to us unchanged and entire through witnesses who carefully committed to writing what they themselves had seen or heard. They maintain — and particularly in their treatment of the Fourth Gospel — that much is due of course to the Evangelists — who, however, added much from their oown imaginations; but much, too, is due to narratives compiled by the faithful at other periods, the result, of course, being that the twin streams now flowing in the same channel cannot be distinguished from one another. Not thus did Jerome and Augustine and the other Doctors of the Church understand the historical trustworthiness of the Gospels; yet of it one wrote: “He who saw it has borne witness, and his witness is true; and he knows that he tells the truth, and you also may believe” an. 19:35). So, too, St. Jerome: after rebuking the heretical framers of the apocryphal Gospels for “attempting rather to fill up the story than to tell it truly,”[47] he says of the Canonical Scriptures: “None can doubt but that what is written took place.”[48] Here again he is in fullest harmony with Augustine, who so beautifully says: “These things are true; they are faithfully and truthfully written of Christ; so that whosoever believes His Gospel may be thereby instructed in the truth and misled by no lie.”[49]

28. All this shows us how earnestly we must strive to avoid, as children of the Church, this insane freedom in ventilating opinions which the Fathers were careful to shun. This we shall more readily achieve if you, Venerable Brethren, will make both clergy and laity committed to your care by the Holy Spirit realize that neither Jerome nor the other Fathers of the Church learned their doctrine touching Holy Scripture save in the school of the Divine Master Himself. We know what He felt about Holy Scripture: when He said, “It is written,” and “the Scripture must needs be fulfilled,” we have therein an argument which admits of no exception and which should put an end to all controversy. (Pope Benedict XV, Spiritius Paraclitus, September 15, 1920.)

There is really nothing more that needs to be written about men who, barring a miraculous conversion, will wind up being “welcomed” into hell by the adversary, who will then proceed to torture them for all eternity those who were stupid as to claim that “welcoming” practitioners of perverse sins against nature important enough for them to teach that, in essence, Holy Scripture is not inerrant and can be ignored with impunity in order not to offend the tender sensibilities of those steeped, objectively speaking, in one Mortal Sin after another.

Yet it is the commission and/or celebration of Mortal Sins is, contrary to what James Martin has long contended, not compatible with devotion to the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus, it is a mockery of the pure love of Love Himself for His Co-Equal, Co-Eternal God the Father and for us as sin of any kind wounds the Sacred Heart of Jesus once in time and is a fresh source of sorrow to His Most Blessed Mother’s Immaculate Heart, out of which the Sacred Heart of Jesus was formed in her Virginal and Immaculate Womb and which beats in unison with It for all eternity.

How diabolical it is that James Martin continues to urge Catholics to do that which wounded the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus and grieves the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary afresh today:

As in previous years, Father James Martin has urged Catholics to celebrate “Pride month,” saying that “for the LGBTQ community” it is “a recognition of the human dignity of a group of people who have, for centuries been, treated with contempt, rejection and violence.”

Amid the rise of LGBT ideology in secular society, the prominence of marking June as “Pride month” has similarly grown.

For the Jesuit Martin, it is important for this to be the case. “Pride month,” he wrote, is “mainly about supporting the fundamental human rights of the LGBTQ community: the right to live in safety, the right to be treated as equals, and the right to be fully welcome in society.”

Continuing, he wrote in his pro-LGBT outlet Outreach:

For the religious person, this month is also a reminder that LGBTQ people are beloved children of God. Pride Month reminds Catholics to treat LGBTQ people with the “respect, compassion and sensitivity” that the Catechism commands, the “closeness, compassion and tenderness” that Pope Francis has taught, and the love and mercy that Jesus showed to all people, especially those on the margins, during his public ministry.

It’s especially important for churches to mark Pride Month since much of the rejection that LGBTQ people have faced has been motivated by Christianity – at least what many people think Christianity teaches. An example: One of the most common reasons for homelessness among LGBTQ teens is that they have been kicked out of their families for ostensibly religious reasons.

The Catholic Church teaches that “homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered” and “are contrary to the natural law,” adding explicitly that “under no circumstances can they be approved.” This language has drawn criticism from Martin in the past, who has questioned the Church’s choice of language.

The Church also has a special devotion to the Sacred Heart of Jesus in June, which Martin himself noted, but as in previous years he said that this devotion could easily be aligned with Pride Month:

As I see it, the two are complementary, not contradictory. The Sacred Heart teaches us how Jesus loves; Pride Month reminds us whom Jesus invites us to love today.

He also sought to distance himself somewhat from the LGBT festival that “Pride” events tend to be, attesting that “just because you celebrate Pride Month doesn’t mean that you necessarily agree with what every person, every organization or even every float in every parade has to say.”

Giving the month to “Pride,” opined the Jesuit, “is mainly about supporting the fundamental human rights of the LGBTQ community: the right to live in safety, the right to be treated as equals, and the right to be fully welcome in society.”

“For the LGBTQ person,” he added, “pride is not about vanity but about human dignity.”

“Pride month” is societally promoted as an acceptance of all things related to LGBT ideology and appears at its heart to be a rejection of traditional Catholic teaching on marriage, morality, and the family.

Pride is also listed by the Church as one of the seven deadly sins – an aspect often highlighted by clerics who warn against promoting, or participating in, “Pride month.”

Martin also condemned the sin of pride, but commented that the celebration of “Pride month” is something different:

But the second kind of pride is a consciousness of one’s own dignity. And that’s closer to what Pride Month is meant to be for the LGBTQ community: a recognition of the human dignity of a group of people who have, for centuries been, treated with contempt, rejection and violence.

He encouraged individuals to congratulate young people who declare themselves as “LGBTQ,” saying that “God wants them to be who they are”:

Maybe the best way to think about Pride Month is to imagine what you would say to a young person who finally summoned up the courage to tell you that they are LGBTQ. You know that God created them. You know that God loves them. And you know that God wants them to be who they are. So, you would probably say, “I am so proud of you for being able to say that.”

Lamenting the decline in “Pride” events this year – a marked phenomenon in contrast to 2024 – Martin also suggested that such events “may be more relevant than ever.”

Thanks in part to Martin’s own activity with his LGBT Outreach group, Pope Francis welcomed a number of LGBT groups at the Vatican in recent years and directly supported Martin’s Outreach.

Martin’s own record on LGBT issues is well documented, and among other things has promoted same-sex civil unions and has described viewing God as male as “damaging.”

Martin has previously denied that he rejects Church teaching on homosexuality and LGBT issues, although he has become the public champion of such questions in the Church. But others disagree. Raymond Cardinal Burke deemed the priest’s teaching as “not coherent with the Church’s teaching on homosexuality.” Archbishop Charles Chaput joined the ranks of prelates opposing Martin, saying that on LGBT issues, he “does not speak with authority on behalf of the Church.” (Fr. James Martin urges Catholics to celebrate LGBT ‘Pride Month’.)

Let me put the matter bluntly: James Martin is a heretic who believes that it is perfectly normal for human beings to identify themselves as being inclined to the commission of perverse sins against the Sixth and Ninth Commandments.

The sin of Sodom is one of the four sins that cry out to Heaven for vengeance and, as such, is a matter of shame, not of “pride.”

Indeed, even natural sins against Holy Purity were once matters of such great shame that Catholics who conceived a child outside of Holy Matrimony usually were married in private Nuptial Ceremony in a parish’s sacristy or rectory to avoid giving public scandal by appearing to sanction fornication as something other than shameful.

This is no longer the case within the counterfeit church of conciliarism, whose embrace of explicit classroom instruction in matters pertaining to the Holy Purity helped to predispose young Catholics to “fulfilling” their carnal desires, the resistance to which has been weakened supernaturally by the sacramentally barren nature of the conciliar sect’s invalid, sacrilegious liturgical rites.

It must not be forgotten that the “Margaret Sanger” of breaking down the innocence and purity of children, Mary Calderone, the founder of the Sex and Information Committee of the United States of America (SIECUS) worked very closely with the-then “Monsignor” James T. McHugh of the National Conference of Catholic “Bishops”/United States Catholic Conference to introduce, propagate and institutionalize “sex education” in conciliar schools (see Mrs. Randy McHugh's The McHugh Chronicles and her definitive Sex Education - The Final Plague). This was done despite the explicit prohibition against such instruction found in Pope Pius XI's Divini Illius Magistri that was reaffirmed by the Holy Office on March 21, 1931:

65. Another very grave danger is that naturalism which nowadays invades the field of education in that most delicate matter of purity of morals. Far too common is the error of those who with dangerous assurance and under an ugly term propagate a so-called sex-education, falsely imagining they can forearm youths against the dangers of sensuality by means purely natural, such as a foolhardy initiation and precautionary instruction for all indiscriminately, even in public; and, worse still, by exposing them at an early age to the occasions, in order to accustom them, so it is argued, and as it were to harden them against such dangers.

66. Such persons grievously err in refusing to recognize the inborn weakness of human nature, and the law of which the Apostle speaks, fighting against the law of the mind; and also in ignoring the experience of facts, from which it is clear that, particularly in young people, evil practices are the effect not so much of ignorance of intellect as of weakness of a will exposed to dangerous occasions, and unsupported by the means of grace.

67. In this extremely delicate matter, if, all things considered, some private instruction is found necessary and opportune, from those who hold from God the commission to teach and who have the grace of state, every precaution must be taken. Such precautions are well known in traditional Christian education, and are adequately described by Antoniano cited above, when he says:

Such is our misery and inclination to sin, that often in the very things considered to be remedies against sin, we find occasions for and inducements to sin itself. Hence it is of the highest importance that a good father, while discussing with his son a matter so delicate, should be well on his guard and not descend to details, nor refer to the various ways in which this infernal hydra destroys with its poison so large a portion of the world; otherwise it may happen that instead of extinguishing this fire, he unwittingly stirs or kindles it in the simple and tender heart of the child. Speaking generally, during the period of childhood it suffices to employ those remedies which produce the double effect of opening the door to the virtue of purity and closing the door upon vice. (Passage and double-indented quotation as found in Pope Pius XI's Divini Illius Magistri, December 31, 1929.)

I) Can the method be approved, which is called "sexual education," or even "sexual initiation?"

Response: In the negative, and that the method must be persevere entirely as set forth up to the present entirely as set forth up to the present by the Church and saintly men, and recommended by the Most Holy Father in the Encyclical Letter, "On the Christian Education of Youth," given on the 31st day of December, 1929. Naturally, care must especially be taken that a full and solid religious instruction be given to the youth of both sexes without interruption; in this instruction there must be aroused a regard, desire, and love for the angelic virtue; and especially must it be inculcated upon them to insist on prayer, to be constant in the sacraments of penance and the Most Holy Eucharist, to be devoted to the Blessed Virgin Mother of holy purity, with filial devotion and to commit themselves wholly to her protection; to avoid carefully dangerous reading, obscene plays, associated with the wicked, and all occasions of sin.

By no means, then, can we approve what has been written and published in defense of the new method especially in these recent times, even on the part of some Catholic authors. (Henry Denzinger, Enchirdion Symbolorum, thirteenth edition, translated into English by Roy Deferrari and published in 1955 as The Sources of Catholic Dogma--referred to as "Denziger," by B. Herder Book Company of St. Louis, Missouri, and London, England, Nos. 2183-2185, pp. 597-598.)

It does not get any plainer than that.

Yet it is that the conciliar revolutionaries have miseducated several generation of young Catholics to place themselves openly in occasions of sin. This is a denial of the efficacy of the graces won for us by the shedding of every single drop of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ's Most Precious Blood on the wood of the Holy Cross and that flow into human hearts and souls through the loving hands of Our Lady, she who is the Mediatrix of All Graces.

How do children learn to grow in purity?

By being taught to love God with their whole hearts, minds, bodies, souls, and strength.

By eliminating, as far as is humanly possible, the incentives to sin as found in popular culture (eliminating the television as a starting point, of course), refusing to expose children to the near occasions of sin represented by immodestly dressed relatives or friends, refusing to permit them to associate with playmates whose innocence and purity have been undermined by the culture and by "education" programs that serve in public schools to be instruments of promoting sin and that serve in conciliar schools as the means of justifying it. By keeping our children close to the Sacraments, which means, of course, getting them out of the counterfeit church of conciliarism, and making sure that the family Rosary is prayed every day with fervor and devotion.

Too Catholic?

Too unrealistic?

Just take a look at the statement issued by the Holy Office on March 21, 1931.

Do we need "theft instruction" in order to keep our children from stealing?

Do children, who are naturally curious, have to learn about the various forms of thievery available to them in order to know that it is wrong to violate the Seventh Commandment? Might such "theft instruction" actually serve as an incentive to the mischievous to steal?

The fact that the conciliar authorities in the Occupied Vatican on the West Bank of the Tiber River have seen fit to defy the prohibitions against explicit classroom instruction in matters pertaining to the Sixth and Ninth Commandments because they are penultimate naturalists. Although the social revolutionaries have been at work for a long time to undermine Holy Purity by promoting contraception, abortion, smut and, in more recent decades, every degrading perverse practice under the sun, it is nevertheless true that the conciliar revolutionaries have given a green light and a wink and a nod to impurity in defiance of both the Divine Positive Law, which God has revealed to Holy Church directly, and of the Natural Law of which He is the Author.

It is no act of “love” to engage in any kind of impure behavior as our love for others must be premised upon a love of God and a due submission to His Holy Commandments.

Moreover, the love of the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus for us is not a matter of empty sentimentality but of His own Divine Will that seeks our sanctification and salvation. No one loves another authentically if he says or does anything, either by omission or commission, which reaffirms someone else in their Mortal Sins. Authentic love wills the good of others, the ultimate expression of which the sanctification and salvation of their immortal souls.

Catholics used to understand all this, but the conciliar revolutionaries have destroyed the sensus Catholicus, making it more possible than would otherwise be case for Catholics to be catechized by what passes for the “popular culture” and thus become so oblivious to the true Catholic teaching on Faith and Morals as to recoil in horror when someone explains to them the errors of their ways.

Indeed, the so-called “popular culture” has become so suffused with the lavender agenda that it is considered “shameful” to express opposition to sodomy as the sin that is, no less to oppose its shameless advance in law, politics, education, and in every aspect of social life.

The ready willingness to “out” “closeted” critics of sodomy is an inversion of all reality, but this inversion is so ingrained in the social consciousness that a man identified as a “Christian activist” who served as a vice president of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts was “outed” by Cable News Network after “investigating” his past criticism of sodomy, thus resulting in his summary dismissal from the Kennedy Center:

A former vice president at the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts says he was fired by the organization following a CNN investigation into his previous comments on gay marriage.

Floyd Brown, who served as the center’s top fundraiser for only several weeks, wrote in a social media post this week he was fired after being contacted by a CNN reporter inquiring about his comments on his personal website and other platforms criticizing homosexuality and floating conspiracy theories about former President Obama.

“Comments rooted in my personal Christian views, which I have made in the past, have no impact upon my work here at the Kennedy Center nor do they impinge on my interactions with colleagues who do incredible work for the patrons of the Center,” Brown wrote in a statement he said he provided to CNN and included in his post on social platform X. “As a Christian I am called to work with others of different beliefs and worldviews.”

Brown said he asked for an explanation for his firing and to speak with Richard Grenell, a President Trump ally and the interim Kennedy Center president, but “both of those requests have been ignored.”

“My only conclusion is [Grenell] was intimidated by a CNN story … so he preemptively fired me for my Christian beliefs on marriage,” Brown said.

The CNN story laid out Brown’s history of attacking Republican leaders and activists for an “acceptance of the open promotion of the gay lifestyle inside the tent of conservatism” and comments calling gay marriage “a hoax” and “godless.”

A source familiar with the Kennedy Center told The Hill Brown’s tweet was not accurate and noted CNN reported “Grenell had not met with Brown, did not know him, and was not involved in his hiring.”

A representative for the Kennedy Center declined to comment on Brown’s dismissal. (Ex-Kennedy Center VP says he was fired over anti-gay remarks.)

Richard Grenell, of course, is an open sodomite who served “proudly” as President Donald John Trump’s first administration as the United States Ambassador to the Federal Republic of Germany and then as the Acting Director of the United States Central Intelligence Agency.

Grenell led a Trump-Pence administration effort to fight against laws in nations that “criminalized” sodomy. A review of this effort is included below in Appendix A, but it should be pointed out that Grenell is so intolerant of opposition to his perverse vice that he said in an interview last year that those who opposed sodomy should be “read out” of the Republican Party:

“I’ve watched how [conservatives have] changed on gay issues.… at this point, there’s no debate about [gay] equality,” the openly gay Grenell told former President Donald Trump’s son, Don Trump, Jr., in a May 2, 2024 interview on the latter’s show, Triggered. “And now I really believe that you can’t be anti-gay in the Republican Party and not be run out of the party.”

“It’s really important for people to understand … that the [pro-gay] growth in the Republican Party has been enormous. Donald Trump has blown the doors off this process to really welcome gay conservatives in,” Grenell said excitedly, before tearing into the “gay Left.”

Grenell is widely popular in MAGA world for his Trump loyalty and his strong defense of Trump’s “America First” foreign policy. In the current administration, Trump appointed Grenell as Special Presidential Envoy for Special Missions of the United States.

Grenell’s cocksure assertion about the unpopularity of Republicans who oppose homosexuality – in line with pro-homosexual “marriage” and pro-“gay parenting” statements by other leading homosexual conservatives (also called “HomoCons” or “GayCons”) like Dave Rubin – signals a growing confidence, bordering on arrogance, among this tiny portion of the Republican “big tent.”

With a shared self-interest in rationalizing their disordered sexual lifestyle, the GayCons have skillfully exploited Trump’s social liberalism and apathy toward GOP “culture war” politics. Trump’s nonchalance toward homosexuality goes way back; in fact, he was “introduced to conservatives at the annual CPAC (Conservative Political Action Committee) conference in D.C. in 2011 by activists with GOProud, a splinter group for homosexual Republicans that is now defunct.

Most Republicans probably are unaware that Trump as a New York city businessman once strongly advocated for “gay rights,” as he did most emphatically in a 2000 interview with the homosexual magazine The Advocate, in which he proposed making homosexuality part of U.S. civil rights law.

“I like the idea of amending the 1964 Civil Rights Act to include a ban of discrimination based on sexual orientation. It would be simple. It would be straightforward. We don’t need to rewrite the laws currently on the books,” Trump told The Advocate, responding to the question: “What would you do to combat antigay prejudice?”

“But amending the Civil Rights Act would grant the same protection to gay people that we give to other Americans – it’s only fair,” he said. “I actually suggested this first, and now I see [then-Democrat presidential candidate Senator] Bill Bradley has jumped on the bandwagon and is claiming the idea as his own.”

Twenty-five years later, with their legion of conservative media followers and allies, the GayCons make up a powerful force that could propel the Trump-dominated GOP to permanently abandon its longstanding platform defending traditional marriage and opposing legal “rights” based on sex-and-gender aberrance. (Trump adviser Ric Grenell says 'anti-gay' voices not welcome in GOP.)

The poor chap who wrote the article quoted just above must either be very young or living under a rock as the Republican Party long ago made its peace with “gay marriage” and almost the entirety of the sodomite agenda, something that is amply demonstrated in the appendices below.

For the moment, though, consider the fact that forty-seven Republican members of the United States House of Representatives voted for the “Respect for Marriage Bill,” known colloquially as the “Marriage Equality Act,” on July 19, 2022, that was later passed by the United States Senate and then signed into law by the poster boy for political, moral, and ethical corruption named Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr. on December 13, 2022, that codified the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States of America in the case of Obergefell v. Hodges, June 26, 2015:

The House of Representatives voted Tuesday to affirm the legality of same-sex marriage after the Supreme Court last month reversed its position on abortion rights, sparking concern that other major rulings might be revisited.

Forty-seven Republicans, including New York Reps. Elise Stefanik, Nicole Malliotakis, Andrew Garbarino and Lee Zeldin, joined all Democrats in the 267-157 vote.

It’s unclear, however, if the Democrat-controlled Senate will vote on the measure to make permanent the effect of the Supreme Court’s 2015 ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges, which allowed gay and lesbian couples to wed in all 50 states.

Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said Tuesday that there may not be enough time to send the bill to President Biden’s desk this year — even if there’s enough Republican support to clear the 60-vote threshold required to proceed.

Durbin said, “We have more priorities than we have time,” Igor Bobic of the Huffington Post reported on Twitter.

The Supreme Court on June 24 voted in Dobbs v. Jackson to rescind federal abortion rights and return the issue to state governments, overturning the 1973 ruling in Roe v. Wade in a decision that attempted to tamp down fears that other rights would be next.

The five-justice majority opinion accused dissenting justices of attempting to “stoke unfounded fear that our decision will imperil” other rulings that legalized the use of contraceptives, sexual relations between people of the same sex and same-sex marriage.

The majority opinion said, “to ensure that our decision is not misunderstood or mischaracterized, we emphasize that our decision concerns the constitutional right to abortion and no other right. Nothing in this opinion should be understood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion.”

However, one conservative justice voting in the majority, Clarence Thomas, submitted a concurring opinion that said “in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell.”

Same-sex marriage currently has overwhelming public support — with 71% of US adults favoring the practice being legal, according to a Gallup survey released in June. However, there are significant regional differences and support for the policy was considered politically toxic just a decade ago.

Biden, as a Delaware senator, voted in 1996 to ban federal recognition of same-sex marriage. But as vice president, Biden in 2012 abandoned his opposition in what was seen as a possible gaffe that forced then-President Barack Obama to also drop his resistance to the reform.

Massachusetts in 2004 was the first state to allow same-sex marriage and the Supreme Court’s 2015 ruling in Obergefell ended a protracted struggle that included state and federal lawsuits, voter initiatives and state legislation.

Former President Donald Trump, a Republican, was “the first president to start as president approving of gay marriage,” his adviser Kellyanne Conway said in 2019. Trump appointed the first gay Cabinet-level official, acting intelligence director Ric Grenell, in 2020 after posing with a rainbow flag during the 2016 campaign.

Some Republicans who voted against the bill Tuesday said it wasn’t necessarily because they oppose same-sex marriage.

“In a fit of hysteria triggered by one sentence in a concurring opinion by Justice Thomas, Democrats have moved to introduce a bill codifying Obergefell v. Hodges,” tweeted Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.). “This holding is not in jeopardy. Gay marriage doesn’t offend me nearly as much as offending federalism does through this legislation.” (House codifies same-sex marriage, 157 GOP reps vote 'no'.)

Perhaps it should be noted here that the then former President Donald John Trump celebrated Biden’s signing of the “Respect for Marriage Act” into law with a big hootenanny at Mar-a-Lago:

(LifeSiteNews) – Just two days after Joe Biden signed the so-called “Respect for Marriage Act” [RMA] into law, LGBT Republicans celebrated its enactment at a gala event at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort home, hosted by the former president himself.

Trump was joined by Arizona’s 2022 GOP gubernatorial candidate, Kari Lake, and an array of high profile “GayCons” (homosexual “conservatives”) including former Director of National Intelligence Ric Grenell, a Trump appointee, and frequent Tucker Carlson guest commentator Chadwick Moore.

Fox News’ Tammy Bruce, a lesbian, received the “Spirit of Lincoln Award” from the Log Cabin Republicans, the GOP LGBT organization which sponsored the event. Last year’s recipient was former First Lady Melania Trump.

Here’s the thing: Instead of celebrating the passage and enactment of the new law, President Trump and Kari Lake should’ve seized the opportunity to renounce it.

And instead of congratulating the 500 or so “GayCons” gathered in Mar-a-Lago’s ballroom, Trump and Lake should’ve asked these men and women to show that they truly are conservatives by affirming the immutable definition of marriage – as conjugal and complementary – and repudiating RMA.

Although Trump reportedly did not mention the new law in his speech, he did proclaim, “We are fighting for the gay community, and we are fighting and fighting hard.”

“With the help of many of the people here tonight in recent years, our movement has taken incredible strides, the strides you’ve made here is incredible,” added the former Republican president and declared 2024 candidate.

According to Politico, Kari Lake employed foul language to address the crowd, saying, “We just had such a huge movement going into Election Day, to watch these people — these evil b*stards, can I say that here? To watch them steal this election in broad daylight, and if they think they’re going to get away with it, they messed with the wrong b*tch.”

Among the other presenters and award recipients at the LGBT GOP gala were outgoing U.S. Senator Rob Portman, a Republican who defected from social conservatism to become one of 12 GOP Senators who voted for the RMA, and Newsmax host Rob Schmitt, formerly of Fox & Friends First.

“The Log Cabin Republicans attacked Matt Rinaldi for faithfully representing the socially conservative views of Texas Republicans. They launched a full-court press to demonize Rinaldi but it failed,” wrote Pedro Gonzalez in a long Twitter thread critical of the Mar-A-Lago event.

“These are the people Trump is hosting.”

“The purpose of the Log Cabin Republicans is to move the GOP further left on the sexual revolution, to browbeat the socially conservative grassroots scene with LGBT nonsense—and Trump is acting as their *vehicle*,” he noted.

Gonzalez continued:

It’s not just that Trump is indistinguishable from Biden on this issue, it’s that he is elevating the Log Cabin Republicans and LGBT ideology to a level it has never seen on the right.

The Log Cabin Republicans tried to destroy a grassroots Republican movement in Texas because it was too socially conservative—and Trump hosts them at his Winter White House to celebrate “gay rights.”

Does it feel like that’s what we need right now? More LGBTism?

“Tell me one more time that Trump is not the most pro-gay President in American history,” tweeted Gala attendee David Leatherwood.

“One cannot simply be MAGA, one must be ULTRA MAGA,” wrote Leatherwood in another tweet, featuring an oddly posed picture with Kari Lake and others. (Trump hosts gala for homosexual Republicans at Mar-a-Lago after Biden signs same-sex 'marriage' law.)

Although the author of this article believes that “conservatism” must be saved from the growing influence of sodomites, lesbians, mutants and other deviants, any and every form of Judeo-Masonic naturalism, including “conservatism” in all its multiple variations and permutations, is incapable of retarding the influence of evil within its ranks and/or that of society-at-large, something that Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ made abundantly to clear to us in all the circumstances of our lives when he said:

I am the true vine; and my Father is the husbandman. [2] Every branch in me, that beareth not fruit, he will take away: and every one that beareth fruit, he will purge it, that it may bring forth more fruit. [3] Now you are clean by reason of the word, which I have spoken to you. [4] Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, unless it abide in the vine, so neither can you, unless you abide in me. [5] I am the vine: you the branches: he that abideth in me, and I in him, the same beareth much fruit: for without me you can do nothing.

[6] If any one abide not in me, he shall be cast forth as a branch, and shall wither, and they shall gather him up, and cast him into the fire, and he burneth. [7] If you abide in me, and my words abide in you, you shall ask whatever you will, and it shall be done unto you. [8] In this is my Father glorified; that you bring forth very much fruit, and become my disciples. [9] As the Father hath loved me, I also have loved you. Abide in my love. [10] If you keep my commandments, you shall abide in my love; as I also have kept my Father's commandments, and do abide in his love. (John 15: 1-10.)

Moreover, Holy Mother Church has taught us consistently that it is impossible for there to be any kind of well-ordered society if men sin wantonly, celebrate it openly and then endeavor to institutionalize it under cover of law while seeking to shame anyone who opposes their shamelessness into silence.

Our cause is not the Republican cause or the “conservative” cause or the American cause.

Our one and only cause is Catholicism as the sole means of personal sanctification and salvation and as the only legitimate, but given fallen human nature, never an infallible guarantor of, foundation of a just social order.

We stand for Christ the King and His Holy Catholic Church no matter what it may cost us in terms of human respect, career security, financial stability, or even relationships with friends and family, and rely upon Our Lady to send us the graces to remain faithful in the truth as we discharge the Spiritual Works of Mercy and thus avoid becoming complicit in the sins of others:

To instruct the ignorant.
To counsel the doubtful.
To admonish sinners.
To bear wrongs patiently;
To forgive offences willingly;
To comfort the afflicted;
To pray for the living and the dead.

Catholics also believe that there are nine ways that they can be accessories to the sins of others:

1. By counsel.
2. By command.
By consent.
By provocation.
By praise or flattery of the evil done.
By silence.
By connivance.
By partaking.
By defense of the ill done.

Conciliarism is by its very false nature uncharitable as it makes a mockery of the authentic, immutable teaching that Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ by making it appear that it is somehow opposed to tenderness and mercy to follow these words that Saint Paul wrote in his Second Epistle to Saint Timothy:

[1] I charge thee, before God and Jesus Christ, who shall judge the living and the dead, by his coming, and his kingdom: [2] Preach the word: be instant in season, out of season: reprove, entreat, rebuke in all patience and doctrine. [3] For there shall be a time, when they will not endure sound doctrine; but, according to their own desires, they will heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears: [4] And will indeed turn away their hearing from the truth, but will be turned unto fables. [5] But be thou vigilant, labour in all things, do the work of an evangelist, fulfill thy ministry. Be sober. (2 Tim. 4: 1-15.)

A physician does not "judge" anyone if he warns him what might happen if he does not stop engaging in a certain course of behavior that is deleterious to his bodily health.

Similarly, one who warns another about the state of his soul as he persists in a life of unrepentant sin is simply performing a fundamental Spiritual Work of Mercy, and those who are inclined to and/or steeped in perverse sins against nature are not to be left without being remonstrated as this is a duty of a Catholic before God and to the eternal and temporal good of the sinner.

It is one thing to sin and to be sorry and then to seek out the mercy of the Divine Redeemer in the Sacred Tribunal of Penance. It is quite another to persist in sin, no less perverse sins against nature, unrepentantly and to expect others to reaffirm him in those sins, whether explicitly by words of approval or implicitly by silence, which betokens consent. Catholics must judge the states of their own souls every night in their Examen of Conscience, and they have a duty to help others to recognize the serious states of sin into which they have plunged themselves, praying beforehand to God the Holy Ghost to fill them with wisdom and prudence so as to provide a warning in such a way that could plant a seed to get an unrepentant sinner to a true priest in the Sacred Tribunal of Penance.

Let us continue to pray to Our Lady of the Sacred Heart of Jesus in this month of June as we pray as our many Rosaries each day as our state-in-life permits to console the good God and to make reparation for our sins and those of the whole world as sin must be abhorred, not celebrated publicly and codified as “right” under the cover of the civil law.

Our Lady of the Rosary, pray for us.

Saint Joseph, pray for us.

Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.

Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.

Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.

Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.

Saints Caspar, Melchior, and Balthasar, pray for us.

Saint Francis Caracciolo, pray for us.

Appendix A

Reviewing Richard Grenell’s Global Effort to Decriminalize Sodomy During the administration of Donald John Trump and Michael Richard Pence

BERLIN — The American ambassador to Germany plans to lead what his embassy said Wednesday was a new and “specific push” to decriminalize homosexuality worldwide.

The ambassador, Richard Grenell, rumored to be a candidate as the next American ambassador to the United Nations, invited about a dozen gay and transgender activists from around Europe to a dinner at his Berlin residence Tuesday night where the effort was discussed.

Guests from the Lithuanian Gay League posted a photo on its Twitter account showing two members posing with Mr. Grenell at the event, thanking him and calling on their country and other European Union members to support the effort, which the Lithuanian guests described as a “Global US campaign.”

The State Department in Washington has not announced a new global campaign for gay and transgender rights, raising questions about the official status of the ambassador’s plan. A department spokesman described the effort as a continuation of longstanding American policy.

The undertaking by Mr. Grenell, the most prominent openly gay diplomat in the Trump administration, was first reported by NBC News on Tuesday.

In recent public statements, Mr. Grenell has denounced Iran in particular, among the 71 countries where homosexuality is outlawed, for its persecution of gay people.

But in an interview with NBC, Mr. Grenell sought to portray the effort as much broader. “This is not just about Iran,” he said in the interview. “This is about 71 countries, and Iran is one of them.”

Mr. Grenell also declined in the interview to answer whether he was interested in the United Nations ambassador post, which has been vacant for nearly two months. “I serve at the pleasure of the president,” he told NBC.

The ambassador was traveling on Wednesday and was unavailable for comment. But the American Embassy in Berlin confirmed in a statement that he had met with the European gay and transgender rights activists and that Mr. Grenell had viewed the meeting as “the start of a specific push” to decriminalize homosexuality everywhere.

“We are working with European allies on a brand-new launch to decriminalize homosexuality,’’ Mr. Grenell told NBC, despite other issues that divide relations between Europe and the United States. He also said he had spoken to senators supportive of using American foreign aid as part of the effort, although he declined in the interview to specify which senators.

A number of American allies are among the nations that outlaw and severely penalize homosexuality, including Saudi Arabia, and it remained unclear how the effort led by Mr. Grenell would persuade the Saudis or others to end deep-seated discrimination.

Mr. Grenell told NBC that the activists, from Turkey, Ukraine, Bulgaria and other European countries, had joined him and an Iranian expatriate around a large table to discuss the effort. The ambassador said it would require “71 different strategies.”

Also unclear was whether the decriminalization effort was, in fact, new. A State Department spokesman in Washington, Robert Palladino, queried after the NBC report on the effort was broadcast, said: “This really is not a big policy departure. This is longstanding and it’s bipartisan.”

American-led diplomacy to promote gay and transgender rights internationally expanded under President Barack Obama, well before the Trump administration took office. The United Nations Human Rights Council passed its first resolution establishing L.G.B.T. rights as human rights in 2014.

David Pressman, a former American diplomat who is a partner at the Boies Schiller Flexner law firm, who helped lead the Obama administration’s international L.G.B.T. rights strategy, said that despite his contacts among groups who work on such issues, he first heard about Mr. Grenell’s undertaking from news reports.

“What’s surprising is that no one who works these issues within the U.S. government appears to be aware of this effort,’’ Mr. Pressman said. “No one in the groups who have been engaged on these issues appears to be aware of this effort.”

Some leading European rights groups, including the Brussels-based ILGA-Europe, which represents L.G.B.T. people across the Continent, said they had not been invited to the dinner.

“We don’t know the plans or the content of the decriminalization campaign,” said Markus Ulrich, a spokesman for Germany’s largest gay and lesbian rights association, LSVD.

The Trump administration, wary of alienating evangelical conservative members of the president’s base, has a mixed record on L.G.B.T. rights. While Mr. Trump has said he “is fine” with a Supreme Court ruling that same-sex marriage is legal, the administration has taken steps to roll back civil rights for gay and transgender people. He also has reversed an Obama administration policy allowing transgender people to serve in the military.

American critics of Mr. Trump expressed skepticism of Mr. Grenell’s effort. Jeremy Kadden, senior international policy advocate at the Human Rights Campaign, an L.G.B.T. advocacy group in Washington, said that the administration had “consistently worked to undermine the fundamental equality” of gay and transgender people.

“If this commitment is real, we have a lot of questions about their intentions and commitments, and are eager to see what proof and action will follow,” Mr. Kadden said in an emailed statement. (Grenell Starts Global Putsch to Decriminalize Sodomy.)

This is very significant as Richard Grenell would not have spoken about this effort to advance the homosexualist agenda under the cover of forcing mostly Mohammedan nations to end what he considers to be archaic and unjust laws criminalizing sodomite behavior without at least the tacit support of the man, Donald John Trump, who appointed him knowing full well that he is a “married” practitioner of sodomy. It is clear that President Trump’s administration is continuing the efforts undertaken by the administration of former President Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro to act as an imperial promoter of sodomy globally, although this was true also of the administration of William Jefferson Blythe Clinton and the supposedly “pro-life” George Walker Bush.

President Trump, for his part, only said that he had not seen the report of Grenell’s remarks in the Federal Republic of Germany, which is not the same thing as saying that he disagrees with them or that his administration is not trying to work for “liberty” of sodomites in Mohammedan countries. Giving further credence to Grenell’s campaign is the fact that Vice President Michael Richard Pence, the Catholic apostate turned “evangelical” Protestant (he terms himself as a “evangelical Catholic”), has lent his own support to the effort of the government of the United States of America to get Mohammedan countries to change laws not to the liking of the homosexualist collective:

A day after the highest-profile openly gay person in the Trump administration revealed his push to decriminalize homosexuality around the world, the president was caught on camera seemingly unaware of the effort.

Richard Grenell, the U.S. ambassador to Germany, said Tuesday that he has total support from the administration for his gay rights program focusing on 71 countries where homosexuality is still illegal. But Wednesday, a reporter asked President Donald Trump in the Oval Office, “Mr. President, on your push to decriminalize homosexuality — are you doing that? And why?”

"Say it?” Trump responded.

“Your push to decriminalize homosexuality across the world,” the reporter repeated.

Trump responded: "I don't know, uh, which report you're talking about. We have many reports."

Vice President Mike Pence, on the other hand — who has long drawn criticism from gay rights advocates who argue he has supported policies that are anti-LGBTQ, such as opposing same-sex marriage and gays serving in the military — told NBC News on Wednesday that he is in support of Grenell's recently announced policy.

In a briefing with reporters at the State Department on Tuesday, deputy spokesperson Robert Palladino downplayed Grenell’s new effort, describing it as “long-standing,” “bipartisan” and “really is not a big policy departure.”

“I would say that this is a good opportunity to listen and to discuss ideas about how the United States can advance decriminalization of homosexuality around the world, and that’s been our policy,” Palladino said.

Many LGBTQ rights groups were skeptical of Grenell's global efforts, noting that a number of the Trump administration's broader policies have attempted to roll back gay and transgender rights in the United States.

“We’d believe that the Trump administration will work to protect LGBTQ people around the world if they had not attacked LGBTQ people in the U.S. over 90 times since taking office,” LGBTQ media advocacy group GLAAD said.

The Log Cabin Republicans, one of the few right-leaning LGBTQ advocacy groups, praised Grenell's effort.

“By taking this action the administration brings attention to a major human rights violation and positions the United States as the leader to end this injustice,” Jerri Ann Henry, the group's executive director, stated.

Grenell was asked about some of the skepticism surrounding his initiative and the Trump administration’s record on LGBTQ rights, such as efforts to eject transgender and HIV-positive people from the military. “Save the other fights for later,” the ambassador responded. (Trump Asked About Grenell's Putsch for Decrminalization of Sodomy.)

Richard Grenell is a clever man. He is attempting to use the cover of a supposedly “pro-life” administration that is under attack by coup plotters working in conjunction with the mainslime media to further mainstream the acceptance of sodomy as “normal” and “natural” by concentrating on something that he knows even most “pro-family” “conservatives can support, namely, the elimination of civil penalties, up to and including the death penalty, for the sodomite behavior. This is quite a clever strategy as it based on an emotional appeal to support the supposed “right” of people to practice sodomy openly universally without any civil penalty and without any social reprobation or revulsion.

Furthermore, Grenell knows full well that he can count on the full support of establishment Republicans who have surrendered on the “social issues” in order to curry favor with “moderate” voters and, quite specifically, with the monied campaign donors who are “proud” and fully “out in the open” sodomites:

BERLIN — U.S. Ambassador to Germany Richard Grenell says the Trump administration has strong backing at home from Republicans and even religious conservatives for its push to end laws that criminalize homosexuality in foreign countries, telling NBC News that he’s “wildly supported by both parties.”

In an exclusive interview in Berlin, Grenell says he has no concerns that the campaign he announced this week could trigger resistance from elements of President Donald Trump’s base, such as evangelicals who have pushed back against policies like gay marriage in the United States. He says the new global effort is focused narrowly on ending criminalization.

“This is a bipartisan push. People understand — religious people, individuals who may not always be in the LGBTI fight — they understand that criminalizing homosexuality is absolutely wrong,” Grenell said. “It is unbelievable to believe that in today’s world a 32 –year-old man in Iran can be hanged simply for being gay. That’s unacceptable.”

Grenell says he’s spoken with senators who support leveraging U.S. influence by conditioning American economic aid on countries eradicating laws that outlaw homosexuality, but he declined to say which senators supported that measure

“That’s certainly not going to be an easy task, but I think we’ve got some great support on the Hill,” Grenell says.

While the campaign thus far has largely emphasized criticism of Iran for reported executions of gays, Grenell says the issue is much larger.

“This is not about Iran. This is not just about Iran,” he says. “This is about 71 countries, and Iran is one of them.”

Grenell sat down with NBC News as three U.S. officials say he is under consideration to be Trump’s next ambassador to the United Nations, a post for which he was also considered previously. Trump’s initial pick to replace Nikki Haley, Heather Nauert, withdrew from consideration over the weekend, creating an opening for one of the most prominent roles on Trump’s foreign policy team.

“I serve at the pleasure of the president,” Grenell said when asked if he was interested in the U.N. job. Pressed again on whether he would consider taking the position, he said: “I really serve at the pleasure of the president.”

The Trump administration effort, first disclosed Tuesday by NBC News, aims at pressuring the 71 countries that still penalize homosexual activity to change their laws, including those that subject gay people to the death penalty or imprisonment. U.S. embassies in Europe and the State Department’s human rights bureau are organizing the effort, which kicked off Tuesday with a strategy dinner that included a dozen LGBT activists from Europe flown in by the U.S. Embassy in Berlin.

The vocal push from Grenell, the highest-profile openly gay person serving in Trump’s administration, stands in contrast to the administration’s perceived record on gay rights. Vice President Mike Pence, in particular, has faced intense criticism from LGBT groups who argue he’s supported policies that are anti-LGBT, such as opposing same-sex marriage and opposing the lifting of the ban on gays serving openly in the military.

Asked whether Pence, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Trump himself were on board with his efforts, Grenell said that “decriminalizing homosexuality is something that people absolutely agree is a policy that we have to move forward on.”

Pence’s office told NBC News Wednesday afternoon that the vice president supports the policy that Grenell is advocating and note that Pence had criticized Iran as recently as last week in Warsaw, where he said: "The authoritarian regime in Tehran represses the freedom of speech and assembly, it persecutes religious minorities, brutalizes women, executes gay people, and openly advocates the destruction of the State of Israel."

Yet some LGBT groups were quick to dismiss Grenell’s efforts, with some suggesting the Trump administration was trying to paper over its broader policies that have rolled back gay rights.

Stuart Milk, an LGBT activist and nephew of civil rights leader Harvey Milk, said it was “unique” to have a right-leaning administration “leading the charge on an issue that does make a difference in people’s lives.” Milk attended the strategy dinner with Grenell and said he would support anyone who wanted to take on decriminalization.

“My criticism of the Trump administration has been steady. I have actually said that policies coming out of the White House and statements have been life-negating, not just for LGBT people but for many, many communities,” Milk tells NBC News. “But when any administration does something right, we’re going to be there.”

At Tuesday’s dinner, activists from Turkey, Ukraine, Bulgaria and other European countries joined an Iranian expat and Grenell around a large table to hash out strategy for the campaign. Grenell says it will require “71 different strategies” to change the laws in countries that in many cases are dictatorships and monarchies where even domestic public pressure can be ineffective at exacting change.

While the campaign dovetails with the administration’s longstanding efforts to isolate Iran diplomatically and shame its government for its behavior, it also risks creating new tensions with important U.S. allies if the same standard is applied consistently.

Homosexuality is also punishable by death in Saudi Arabia, whose monarchy Trump has defended in the face of human rights allegations. Pakistan, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates and other U.S. partners also have laws on the books used to penalize same-sex activity.

“No one is saying this is going to be easy,” Grenell says. “We can have these conversations of human rights with our allies that clearly make homosexuality a crime and are not great on women’s rights as well. We have to be able to do both.”

Nevertheless, the outsize emphasis on Iran — the Trump administration’s top geopolitical foe — came into clear focus as the activists gathered with Grenell at the U.S. ambassador’s residence.

Hourvash Pourkian, who was born in Iran but left for Europe before the 1979 Iranian Revolution, says it’s incumbent upon the U.S. and European countries to call more attention to Iran’s rights abuses against gays. But she suggested there was little likelihood anything would change while the current Tehran government is still in power.

“I don’t know if there is any possibility to negotiate with Iranian diplomacy,” Pourkian says. “I don’t think so. They refuse. For them, it doesn’t eist.” (Grenell has Pence's Support.)

Although I will return to Richard Grenell’s bold push in behalf of the homosexual collective, it is very important to note that Vice President Michael Richard Pence emphasized the importance of “moving forward," although I will note at this point that a person in a Mohammedan country that penalizes sodomite behavior who chooses to engage in sodomite behavior or to publicly identify himself by means of his shameful affections is no hero of "human rights." Such a person is just plain stupid to be so obstinate in his sins of perdition. To make it appear that people in Mohammedan countries are being "victimized" because of their freely chosen lives of wickedness is to make it appear that laws against sodomy are immoral and unjust, a veritable violation of "universal human rights." Sodomy is not a matter of "universal human rights." It is a sin that cries out to Heaven for vengeance.

The “moving forward” phrase is nothing new for Michael Richard Pence as he used it to excuse his own surrender to the homosexual collective as he backed down from a bill passed by the State Legislature of Indiana to afford “religious liberty” protections for merchants who were being targeted by sodomite activists for compliance with their agenda and silence about their beliefs in exchange for those merchants being able to stay in business without massive fines and constant acts of harassment.

This is what I wrote in April of 2015 when Indiana Governor Michael Richard Pence played the part of Pontius Pilate and said that it was important to “move forward” after he cave in the face of the threats of economic boycotts made by the homosexualist lobby and their corporate stooges:

Last week, Holy Week, saw the Indiana State Legislature’s efforts to use the heresy of “religious liberty” as the foundation to provide merchants such as the O’Connors with a legal defense if sued for refusing to serve practitioners of perversity on religious grounds come under national fire. As Judge Napolitano noted, the original "restoration of religious freedom" law would not have withstood constitutional muster at the Supreme Court of the United States of America. The ensuing maelstrom was such that Indiana Governor Michael Richard “Mike” Pence, whose mother’s family were Catholics, backed off from the “religious freedom restoration” bill that he had signed on Thursday, March 26, 2015, and used Maundy Thursday, April 2, 2015, to sign a “fix” to the law that makes it illegal for service providers to deny service to customers on the basis of “sexual orientation”:

Indiana Gov. Mike Pence urged residents to "move forward together" Thursday after signing off on revisions to a new religious objections law that had sparked criticism that it would allow discrimination against gays.

Lawmakers and business leaders worked together to craft an amendment that prohibits service providers from using the law as a legal defense for refusing to provide services, goods, facilities or accommodations. It also bars discrimination based on race, color, religion, ancestry, age, national origin, disability, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or U.S. military service.

The measure exempts churches and affiliated schools, along with nonprofit religious organizations.

Many groups that had criticized the version of the law signed by Pence hailed the new language. But others said it was worse than the original and could lead to bigger problems.

"There will be some who think this legislation goes too far and some who think it does not go far enough," Pence acknowledged in a statement after signing the amended legislation. "I believe resolving this controversy and making clear that every person feels welcome and respected in our state is best for Indiana."

SHOW OF SUPPORT

Two of Indiana's largest business groups praised the changes.

Indiana Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Kevin Brinegar said Indiana "has suffered tremendously" during the past week's uproar and that the new language is "what businesses and individuals from around the state, country and world needed to hear."

Indy Chamber President and CEO Michael Huber called the changes "a major step in the right direction in efforts to protect the rights of all Hoosiers."

And NCAA President Mark Emmert said the association was "very pleased" with the changes. The Indianapolis-based NCAA was among the first to express concern about the law when it was passed last week. The Final Four is being held in Indianapolis this weekend, and Emmert said the NCAA would consider moving future events out of state if the law wasn't revised.

The women's Final Four is scheduled to be held in Indianapolis next year.

OPPONENTS BRISTLE

Opponents of the changes said they didn't go far enough and could do more harm than good.

Democratic lawmakers called for a repeal of the law Thursday, urging lawmakers to start from scratch.

"I want to hear somebody say, 'We made a grave mistake, and we caused the state tremendous embarrassment that will take months, if not years, to repair,'" House Minority Leader Scott Pelath said. "I want to hear one of the proponents 'fess up, because the healing cannot begin until that happens."

Consumer reporting agency Angie's List, which announced it was putting a planned $40 million expansion on hold over the law, also called for a repeal.

"Employers in most of the state of Indiana can fire a person simply for being lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender or questioning. That's just not right and that's the real issue here. Our employees deserve to live, work and travel with open accommodations in any part of the state," said CEO Bill Oesterle.

Micah Clark of the American Family Association of Indiana said the Legislature's actions didn't clarify the law as Pence had requested but instead changed it in "a way that could now erode religious freedom across Indiana."

"If this revised law does not adequately protect religious liberty for all, it is not really a religious freedom act," Clark said.

Mark Rienzi, senior counsel of the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty in Washington, D.C., said the new language "carves up religious rights" and that the state would be better off if it adopted the language in the 1993 federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

Many groups said the changes are a good first step but urged lawmakers to do more, including adding protections for sexual orientation and gender identity to the state's civil-rights law.

The American Civil Liberties Union said the changes have lessened the harm of the law but that "significant problems" still need to be addressed, including whether the law can be used to deny rights to others, including in education and access to health care.

The group's state affiliate noted that the amendment marks the first time that Indiana law has included positive references to sexual orientation and gender identity. But it said statewide civil-rights protections are still needed.

Two gay rights groups, Freedom Indiana and Lambda Legal, also called for broader protections.

Freedom Indiana campaign manager Katie Blair said the changes "represent an important step forward" and reduce the threat to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender residents.

But she said that without statewide anti-discrimination laws for the LGBT community, "discrimination is still legal" in most of Indiana. (Pence signs religious freedom bill fix.)

One wonders if Governor Pence has his finger bowl handy on Maundy Thursday as he signed the "fix" into law.

In other words, Indiana Governor Mike Pence threw in the towel as a result of the financial pressure, much of it engendered by the same insidious organization that supports illegal immigration, the United States Chamber of Commerce, and lobbying by lavender Nazis such as Apple Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook, who is an aggressive, in-your-face advocate of the perversity that he practices, and the usually array of “human rights” organizations. Absent the true Faith, good readers, sentimentality must triumph as sins of all manner, including those against nature, are celebrated culturally and protected under cover of the civil law. The fact that such a monstrous thing as “gay marriage” has swept its way into law and into widespread public approval is the result of the very heresy of “religious liberty” that the conciliar “popes,” including Jorge Mario Bergoglio, have told us repeatedly is the “key” to “peace” even though Pope Pius VI called it a “monstrous right”.

No, the “moving forward” slogan from the apostate named Michael Richard Pence is nothing new.

Mr. Vice President, how is it “moving forward” to impose on other nations a blithe acceptance of the sin of Sodom, which is one of the four sins that cry out to Heaven for vengeance?

Lost in this exercise of pure emotional manipulation to curry sympathy for “persecuted” sodomites worldwide, especially in Mohammedan countries, is the fact that the death penalty for sodomy was imposed in the era of Christendom during the Middle Ages, and its imposition upon clerics found to be recidivist sodomites was urged by none other than the Pope of the Holy Rosary, Pope Saint Pius V:

That horrible crime, on account of which corrupt and obscene cities were destroyed by fire through divine condemnation, causes us most bitter sorrow and shocks our mind, impelling us to repress such a crime with the greatest possible zeal.

Quite opportunely the Fifth Lateran Council [1512-1517] issued this decree: "Let any member of the clergy caught in that vice against nature . . . be removed from the clerical order or forced to do penance in a monastery" (chap. 4, X, V, 31). So that the contagion of such a grave offense may not advance with greater audacity by taking advantage of impunity, which is the greatest incitement to sin, and so as to more severely punish the clerics who are guilty of this nefarious crime and who are not frightened by the death of their souls, we determine that they should be handed over to the severity of the secular authority, which enforces civil law.

Therefore, wishing to pursue with the greatest rigor that which we have decreed since the beginning of our pontificate, we establish that any priest or member of the clergy, either secular or regular, who commits such an execrable crime, by force of the present law be deprived of every clerical privilege, of every post, dignity and ecclesiastical benefit, and having been degraded by an ecclesiastical judge, let him be immediately delivered to the secular authority to be put to death, as mandated by law as the fitting punishment for laymen who have sunk into this abyss. (Pope Saint Pius V, Horrendum illud scelus, August 30, 1568.)

Death, not "respect," "brotherhood" and "mainstreaming" for the sake of "inclusivity," was what Pope Saint Pius V, faithful to the teaching of Saint Paul the Apostle in his Epistle to the Roman cited above, believed should be imposed on the clergy as well as the laity who were caught in "such an execrable crime" that caused him "such better sorrow" shocked his papal mind as he sought to "repress such a crime with the greatest possible zeal."

Obviously, it is neither possible nor advisable in the midst of the madness produced by the religiously indifferentist civil state of Modernism to impose the sort of penalties upon sodomites who flaunt their behavior openly and unrepentantly that existed during the era of Christendom and that the Apostle to the Gentiles, Saint Paul, noted in his Epistle to the Romans that deserve death:

For this cause God delivered them up to shameful affections. For their women have changed the natural use into that use which is against nature. And, in like manner, the men also, leaving the natural use of the women, have burned in their lusts one towards another, men with men working that which is filthy, and receiving in themselves the recompense which was due to their error. And as they liked not to have God in their knowledge, God delivered them up to areprobate sense, to do those things which are not convenient; Being filled with all iniquity, malice, fornication, avarice, wickedness, full of envy, murder, contention, deceit, malignity, whisperers, Detractors, hateful to God, contumelious, proud, haughty, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, Foolish, dissolute, without affection, without fidelity, without mercy. Who, having known the justice of God, did not understand that they who do such things, are worthy of death; and not only they that do them, but they also that consent to them that do them. (Romans 1: 26-32)

Perhaps Vice President Michael Richard Pence missed this in a Protestant Wednesay evening heretical "Bible Study” program as he was probably too busy trying to “move forward” now as he had done in Indiana four years ago when he played the role of Pontius Pilate by washing his hands of his surrender to the homosexual collective and, perhaps even more pertinently, also played the role of Judas Iscariot by taking the thirty piece of silver that American and multinational corporate entities threatened to take away from the State of Indiana if he did not agree to “move forward.”

While it is true that not every sin can is to be punished by the civil state, it is also true that the civil state has a duty to foster those conditions that make it more possible for citizens to sanctify and to save their immortal souls. Scandalous acts of sodomites committed in public and efforts on the part of sodomites to promote their wicked, perverse and unnatural behavior as an expression of “love” that does not “hurt” anyone else are punishable by the civil state. This is simply a statement of the right of states to preserve a just public order that is part of its duties under the binding precepts of the Natural Law.

Mind you, each human being, including unrepentant sinners, are to be treated with respect and kindness. However, it is no work of kindness to reaffirm sinners in their lives of perdition and it is not work of true Charity to do anything, either by omission or commission, that reaffirms them in their sins, including daring to attend “wedding” ceremonies.

Believing Catholics do not seek to inflict violence upon hardened sinners. They seek to call such sinners to conversion, mindful that they themselves are sinners in need of conversion on a daily basis and to seek to make reparation for their own many sins that have all-too-frequently made them poor witnesses in behalf of Christ the King and His Holy Church, Our Lady and the binding precepts of the Divine Positive Law and the Natural Law. We will the good of all people, but the ultimate expression of the true good all people is the sanctification and salvation of their souls as members of the Catholic Church who confess their sins regularly, firmly resolve to amend their lives and to do penance for their sins.

There is no contradiction between treating all people with respect without respecting their sinful lives, and it is not against true Charity to shun people who desire to evangelize our children into accepting moral behavior that is base, perverted and degenerate. Remember, admonishing the sinner is one of the Spiritual Works of Mercy. It is only after all efforts to exhort and remonstrate with recidivist sodomites fail to bring them to repentance and an amendment of their lives that notorious public sinners would subject to the penalties of the civil law in a state organized on Catholic principles.

There is a distinction between the boogeyman represented by Mohammedan countries enforcing the precepts of the blasphemous Koran against sodomites and the efforts of true Catholic bishops and priests in the past to win the souls of notorious sinners to repentance before—and only as a last resort—they had been turned over to the civil authorities for the penalties due to their perverse behavior. The imposition of such penalties is meant to remove a notorious malefactor from continuing to infect the body politic and to serve as public notice of deterrence to those others who refuse to reform their lives.

Thanks to the Protestant Revolution’s overthrow of the Social Reign of Christ the King and the rise of Judeo-Masonry’s welter of naturalist and anthropocentric philosophies and ideologies, of course, civil states have been founded on false premises that give rise to the triumph of emotionalism, relativism and practical atheism over the course of time.

As to Richard Grenell’s putsch in behalf of the homosexual collective, it is perhaps best to focus on his desire for “conversations” about the sodomite agenda, which is probably his secular version of the conciliar revolutionaries’ penchant for “dialoging” about everything contained in the Sacred Deposit of Faith.

Conversations?

About what?

Is sodomy a matter of “human rights”?

Grenell is using the non-crisis of intervening in the internal affairs of sovereign nations, most of which are founded upon a false religion but whose leaders attempt to be faithful to the precepts taught by that religion, as a “wedge” issue” to start the sort of “conversation” that has resulted in the widespread acceptance of sodomy and its promotion here in the United States of America and elsewhere in the supposedly “civilized” Western world.

The “conversation” here began with using the Stonewall riots that began on June 28, 1969, the Solemnity of Saints Peter and Paul, as an example of how those who choose to identify themselves on the basis of one of four sins that cry out to Heaven for vengeance were being “targeted and persecuted” by the Police Department of the City of New York.

The “conversation” then “moved forward” to seek the repeal, both by legislative and judicial means, of long-unenforced laws at the state level that criminalized sodomite acts.

Simultaneously, the “conversation” involved the use of “Gay Pride Parades” in various cities across the United States of America during the month of the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus, June, to commemorate the Stonewall riots as well as to militate in behalf of “gay rights.”

The “conversation” also relied upon motion picture and television producers to break down the natural revulsion that human beings are supposed to have about unnatural acts in violation of the binding precepts of the Sixth and Ninth Commandments. It was on November 1, 1972, All Saints Day, that the American Broadcasting Company television network (ABC-TV) telecast “That Certain Summer,” starring the late Hal Holbrook and one Martin Sheen as sodomites, thus marking the first full-length effort by a major American television network to mainstream sodomy as an expression of “love.” However, the promoter of all things evil, Norman Lear, had already pushed the envelope on sodomy in a February 9, 1971, episode of All in the Family, “Judging Books by Covers,” that guest-starred the rugged, manly Philip Carey as a high school friend of Archie Bunker who revealed himself to be a homosexual, and such efforts became commonplace in the early-1980s and has reached the point now where each of the four major television networks have produced programs displaying perversity as normal and natural.

Significantly, a cornerstone of the “conversations” as they progressed into the 1970s and 1980s was to introduce the vocabulary of “gayspeak” into the public consciousness. A perfectly good English word, gay, was coopted to refer to people who have chosen to identify themselves on the basis of a personal, volitional predilection to the commission of morally repugnant and perverse acts in violation of the binding precepts of the Divine Positive Law and the Natural Law. This vocabulary has been institutionalized into educational programs and is an integral part of so-called “diversity” indoctrination by American and multinational corporate entities. The situation has reached a state beyond even that of a “twilight zone” as a couple in Texas recently decided to raise a “gender neutral” “theyby.” That’s right, “theyby,” not baby. It will take a while. However, this new effort to distort reality and culture a veritable Dr. Moreau’s Island of Lost Souls will become part an accepted part of the lavender in due course.

As noted tangentially just above, American and multinational corporate entities have been in the vanguard of what Richard Grenell calls the “conversation” about “moving ahead,” and one of the most significant corporate donors (George Soros is a “financier,” of course) has been a certain Robert Kraft, the owner of the New England Patriots football team that won some kind of bowl three weeks ago today, I believe. Here is why the Catholic Action League in Massachusetts was not celebrating that victory:

With the 2019 Super Bowl victory by the New England Patriots, should Catholics join in celebrating a capitalist corporation which promotes moral depravity and sexual perversion, and which opposes religious freedom?

The New England Patriots, as a corporation, and the Kraft family, as individuals, as foundation sponsors, and as corporate donors, have a long history of publicly supporting and copiously funding organizations which advocate the deformity of marriage, the homosexual agenda, and so-called “transgenderism.”

Patriots owner Robert Kraft was one of the most prominent public figures in a group of 165 Massachusetts business and banking leaders who opposed the Protection of Marriage Amendment in 2006.

The New England Patriots, as a corporate entity, and Bob and Myra Kraft, as individuals, after being solicited by MassEquality, signed on to an amicus curiae brief in the Obergefell case, in which the U. S. Supreme Court in 2015, in a majority opinion written by then Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy, overturned the laws of thirty-one states banning same sex so-called marriage.

Both the Patriots and the Kraft owned New England Revolution were part of the coalition which advocated for a “Yes on 3” vote in the 2018 referendum which upheld the coercive Massachusetts “transgender rights” law.

The late Myra Kraft was a major financial supporter for Keshet, an organization which promotes homosexual acceptance in the Jewish community.

BAGLY—the Boston Alliance of Gay Lesbian Bisexual Transgender Queer Youth—a vile organization which proselytizes minors for sodomy—reportedly boasted that they received a $100,000 grant from the Kraft family.

All of these Kraft supported groups oppose conscience clause protections and religious freedom rights for those who have moral objections to the deconstruction of traditional marriage.

Catholic Action League Executive Director C. J. Doyle made the following comment: “The Catechism of the Catholic Church, promulgated by Saint John Paul II in 1992, describes homosexual behavior as “grave depravity,” while Catholic tradition characterizes the sin of impurity against nature as the second of the four sins “which crieth to heaven for vengeance.”

“Catholics, to be faithful to their Redeemer, must learn to be counter-cultural. They should neither celebrate or subsidize individuals or corporations which undermine Divine and natural law, which promote mortal sin, which oppose the liberty of the Church, and which encourage the persecution of Christians.”

“The easy going social conformity of previous generations of American Catholics, with their ethic of assimilation and their tradition of accommodation, is no longer adequate for a time when Christian civilization is being targeted for cultural extinction. American Catholics must defend the Faith as their ancestors did in Europe, with the cardinal virtue of fortitude, and with the understanding that if they are ever to be members of the Church Triumphant in heaven, they must first be members of the Church Militant on earth.” (Catholic Action League.)

This is a very good analysis, noting only Karol Josef Wojtyla/John Paul II, who enabled and protected clerical abusers galore in his hierarchy, was no “saint” and that the Catholic Church is not the same thing as the counterfeit church of conciliarism, which is headed at this time by an apostate who made his “peace” with the lavender agenda years ago.

That having been noted, however, Robert Kraft is just of one many corporate titans who support what Richard Grenell’s “conversation,” another aspect of which has included the mainstreaming sodomy in the United States of America and elsewhere in the “civilized” world has centered around brainwashing children from the tenderest ages into an acceptance of all things lavender by means of explicit classroom instruction in matters pertaining to the Sixth and Ninth Commandments. This “conversation” has been the foundation of such classroom instruction in public centers of ideological indoctrination and programming (public schools) and in formerly Catholic schools in the control of the homosexuals and lesbians and mutants within the structures of the counterfeit church of conciliarism. (See, for example, No Pot O'Gold At The End Of This Rainbow.)

These “conversations” produced a cultural environment that was “ready’ for the acceptance of “civil unions” and then “marriage” between members of the same gender by means of popular referenda, legislative action and judicial fiats.

The “conversation” has reached such a state of degeneracy now that even “conservative” talk show hosts such as Sean Hannity think nothing of referring to two men who believe themselves to be “married” as an example of a “New York City power couple.” Perhaps this “couple” is the same one that donated heavily to Rafael Edward Cruz’s presidential campaign three years ago and arrange tours for sodomites to Israel (see Antichrist's Interchangeable Spare Parts, part two: False Opposites within False Opposites.) Then again, I suppose that there are many such “couples” within the Borough of Manhattan in the City of New York, New York.

Finally, at least for present purposes, these “conversations” have produced a new class of “victims”—sodomites, lesbians, mutants and other practitioners of moral deviancy—who have sought—and largely won—legal recognition as a protected group of citizens entitled to special considerations because of their self-identification as practitioners of sins that cry out to Heaven for vengeance. This victimology has reached such levels of absurdity that a man whose name I have never heard before, Justin Smollett, who is filled with hatred for Donald John Trump and his supporters, went to the lengths of orchestrating an attack” upon himself while he sought pity as victim of “homophobia” and of Trump’s “Make America Great Again” supporter in that notorious Trump stronghold known as the City of Chicago, Illinois. The truth is that Smollett, who was denounced by the Commissioner of the City of Chicago Police Department for his filing a false police report of a crime that he had staged, is filled with anger because he is in rebellion against his own nature, which God made to know, to love, and to serve Him for all eternity in Heaven as a member of His Catholic Church. Those who sin and do not have repentance for their sins will perforce become filled with hatred over time it is they hate themselves and all of their agitation and efforts to convince others to accept their foul deeds is nothing other than displaced anger. Period.

There is no further need for anyone to read the rest of this commentary if you do not find this to be sickening and revolting. Very few people care for the offense given to the Most Blessed Trinity and how souls are being lost for all eternity as unrepented sins that cry out to Heaven for vengeance destroy the domestic cell of the Church Militant on earth, the family, and create conditions of social disarray and a displaced anger by sodomites against all the few remaining people who dare to call them to correction and to call their behavior by its proper name, evil.

Furthermore, what does Richard Grenell mean when referring to nations that “are not great on women’s rights”?

Is he talking about contraception and the surgical execution of preborn babies in their mothers’ wombs?

Perhaps Richard Grenell would agree with the notorious late-term baby-butcher, LeRoy Carhart, that a woman is free to think of her preborn baby as a “problem” (see LeRoy Carhart says that for some women they have a "problem," not a baby even after they deliver a living child) and not as what he is, a human being with his own immortal soul and his own distinct genetic code that God Himself has willed into existence from all eternity.

“Women’s rights”?

Here is another question for you to consider: Why is Richard Grenell even serving in the administration of Donald John Trump?

Well, this last question is really, really easy to answer. Permit me to take you down a trip on memory lane:

Nonetheless, however, the fact remains that Donald John Trump has surrounded himself with homosexuals throughout his business career, and he was guided in the early part of that career by the sodomite Talmudist named Roy Cohn. He is, as he termed himself with Lesley Stahl in a 60 Minutes interview that aired on Sunday, November 13, 2016, a “supporter.” Trump's election and his presidency, impeded as it continues to be by the agents of deep state, thus far are said to have "transformed" the Republican Party. This is very true, but an important part of this transformation is a silent acceptance of the rights of those steeped in the sin of Sodom and its related vices.

Here is a review of his statements and actions in support of sodomites and their agenda, starting with the statement he issued after the Orlando, Florida, nightclub massacre on Sunday, June 13, 2016, and including statements he made later during the general election campaign against Madame Defarge, aka Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton:

We express our deepest sympathies to the victims, the wounded, and their families. We mourn as one people for our nation’s loss, and pledge our support to any and all who need it. I would like to ask now that we all observe a moment of silence for the victims of this attack.

Thank you. Our nation stands together in solidarity with the members of Orlando’s LGBT community. They have been through something that nobody could ever experience. This is a very dark moment in America’s history. A radical Islamic terrorist targeted the nightclub, not only because he wanted to kill Americans, but in order to execute gay and lesbian citizens, because of their sexual orientation.

It’s a strike at the heart and soul of who we are as a nation. It’s an assault on the ability of free people to live their lives, love who they want, and express their identity. It’s an attack on the right of every single American to live in peace and safety in their own country. (Donald John Trump's Remark on the Orlando Shooting.)

Moreover, it must be mentioned that the man who believes in statist security measures that violate the privacy of innocent citizens and who believes that what is best for businesses will "make America great again" expressed has expressed his true beliefs about those steeped in perversity on a number of occasions.

All right, you asked for it:

Lesley Stahl: One of the groups that’s expressing fear are the LGBTQ group. You--

Donald Trump: And yet I mentioned them at the Republican National Convention. And--

Lesley Stahl: You did.

Donald Trump: Everybody said, “That was so great.” I have been, you know, I’ve been-a supporter.

Lesley Stahl: Well, I guess the issue for them is marriage equality. Do you support marriage equality?

Donald Trump: It-- it’s irrelevant because it was already settled. It’s law. It was settled in the Supreme Court. I mean it’s done.

Lesley Stahl: So even if you appoint a judge that--

Donald Trump: It’s done. It-- you have-- these cases have gone to the Supreme Court. They’ve been settled. And, I’m fine with that. (60 Minutes Interview With Donald Trump and Family.)

Please note that Donald John Trump is very sanguine about so-called “marriage equality,” calling himself a “supporter” of the “LGTBQ” agenda. A supporter, something that he indicated very clearly in his acceptance address at the Republican National Convention in Cleveland, Ohio, on Thursday, July 21, 2016:

“49 wonderful Americans were savagely murdered by an Islamic terrorist. This time, the terrorist targeted LGBTQ community – no good and we're going to stop it.

As your President, I will do everything in my power to protect our LGBTQ citizens from the violence and oppression of a hateful foreign ideology – beleive me.”

And as a Republican, it is so nice to hear you cheering for what I just said. Thank you. (Donald John Trump Acceptance Address, Republican National Convention, Cleveland, Ohio July 21, 2016.)

Donald John Trump considers that one can base his identity by his willful decision commit and to persist in the commission of sins that cry out to Heaven for vengeance, a a belief that he shares with many of the conciliar revolutionaries, including Jorge Mario Bergoglio, who is otherwise at odds with the new president on almost every other issue.

Remember also this important post at Call Me Jorge just before November 8, 2016, presidential election: A person holding a rainbow flag</p>
<p>AI-generated content may be incorrect.

This is just one facet of the insecure narcissist, Donald Trump. There is much more to the man which is better left to writing about if he is elected — his connections to Likud, the Jewish Russian mafia, the New York mob, key 9/11 players, etc...

If Trump is elected, will he get his wall? It’s doubtful but who knows. One thing which will happen is the alchemical transformation of the right into a pro-zionist, pro-pedophile, and pro-homosexual party as is currently being done in Europe. Another trend which will continue is the growth to epic proportions of the panopticon which laughably calls itself the most free country in the world. (This was posted on the now defunct Call Me Jorge that Google summarily deplatformed despite the protests of the blogger.)

Not important?

Says who?

Not Christ the King.

Appendix B

The Longstanding Republican Embrace of Sodomy (as excerpted from Giving Free Passes to the “Lesser of Two Evils” When They Promote Grave Evils)

Trump himself did send out a series of “tweets” in 2019 recognizing the month of the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus as “pride month”:

President Donald Trump on Friday recognized LGBTQ Pride Month — something he didn't do during the first two years of his presidency.

"As we celebrate LGBT Pride Month and recognize the outstanding contributions LGBT people have made to our great Nation, let us also stand in solidarity with the many LGBT people who live in dozens of countries worldwide that punish, imprison, or even execute individuals on the basis of their sexual orientation," Trump tweeted.

"My Administration has launched a global campaign to decriminalize homosexuality and invite all nations to join us in this effort!," the president said.

....on the basis of their sexual orientation. My Administration has launched a global campaign to decriminalize homosexuality and invite all nations to join us in this effort!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 31, 2019

Trump pointed to his administration's efforts to decriminalize homosexuality worldwide that are being led by the U.S. Ambassador to Germany, Richard Grenell, who is gay. But when Trump was asked about that effort shortly after its roll out in February, he said, "I don't know."

Trump's recognition of Pride Month — he's the first Republican president to do so after President Bill Clinton established Pride Month in 1999, since President George W. Bush never recognized it during his time in office — comes amid a flurry of anti-LGBTQ activity in the past few months. Trump rolled back healthcare rules aimed at helping LGBTQ people and also opposed the passage of the Equality Act.

Rep. David Cicilline, D-R.I., tweeted a response: "Nice Tweet. Now, how about telling Mitch McConnell to bring up the Equality Act?" referring to the bill passed last month in the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives.

At the 2016 Republican National Convention, Trump noted the Pulse nightclub shooting and became the first GOP presidential nominee to directly address the LGBTQ community from a convention podium.

"As your president, I will do everything in my power to protect our LGBTQ citizens from the violence and oppression of a hateful foreign ideology," Trump said at the time. (Trump recognizes LGBTQ Pride Month for first time.)

Lest the forgetful Biden forget little things called facts, which he has done throughout his wretched career as a leech on the public dole who has taken a lot of loot from his side gigs and those of his family members who are ever on the lookout for the “big guy” to cut a cut of the bounty, it should be remember that Trump’s first appointee to the Supreme Court of the United States of America, Neil Gorsuch, rendered the Court’s decision in the case of Bostock v. Clayton, June 15, 2020, which, flying in the face of Title VII of the United States Civil Rights Act of 1964 as written, established “sexual orientation” as a “civil right”:

The same holds here. There is no way for an applicant to decide whether to check the homosexual or transgender box without considering sex. To see why, imagine an applicant doesn’t know what the words homosexual or transgender mean. Then try writing out instructions for who should check the box without using the words man, woman, or sex (or some synonym). It can’t be done. Likewise, there is no way an employer can discriminate against those who check the homosexual or transgender box without discriminating in part because of an applicant’s sex. By discriminating against homosexuals, the employer intentionally penalizes men for being attracted to men and women for being attracted to women. By discriminating against transgender persons, the employer unavoidably discriminates against persons with one sex identified at birth and another today. Any way you slice it, the employer intentionally refuses to hire applicants in part because of the affected individuals’ sex, even if it never learns any applicant’s sex. (Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch, Opinion of the Court, Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia, June 15, 2020.)

Even Brett Michael Kavanaugh, who dissented from the decision because Gorsuch had done by judicial fiat what, Kavanaugh contended, belonged to Congress to do even though no human legislative body has any authority from God to recognize indecency and perversity as civil rights, “congratulated” those steeped in perversity for their “hard won” victory:

Notwithstanding my concern about the Court’s transgression of the Constitution’s separation of powers, it is appropriate to acknowledge the important victory achieved today by gay and lesbian Americans. Millions of gay and lesbian Americans have worked hard for many decades to achieve equal treatment in fact and in law. They have exhibited extraordinary vision, tenacity, and grit—battling often steep odds in the legislative and judicial arenas, not to mention in their daily lives. They have advanced powerful policy arguments and can take pride in today’s result. Under the Constitution’s separation of powers, however, I believe that it was Congress’s role, not this Court’s, to amend Title VII. I therefore must respectfully dissent from the Court’s judgment. (Associate Justice Brett Michael Kavanaugh Dissentng Opinion, Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia, June 15, 2020.)

Brett Michael Kavanaugh used the language of the adversary to refer to people engaged in sins that brought down fire and brimstone upon the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah and played a very large role in the internal corruption that made possible the fall of the Roman Empire.

What did “Father” Frank Pavone say about any of this.

Well, the exact same thing that he said when the administration of President George Walker Bush promoted the sodomite agenda: Nothing:

Are not the sins of Sodom and Gomorrha being promoted under cover of law and in many aspects of our popular culture today? Do we think that God is pleased with the fact that each of the four sins that cry out to Heaven for vengeance, including the sin of Sodom, is glorified in popular culture and actually protected by means of the civil law in many states of the United States of America. Is God pleased that the current presidential administration of the United States of America has voted to afford two militantly pro-perversity "non-governmental organizations" (NGOs) recognition at the United Nations?

BUSH BACKS OFFICIAL STATUS AT U.N. FOR MILITANT HOMOS

“The United Nations has accepted two radical gay-rights groups as official non-governmental organizations, or NGO’s. The vote to include them was made against the recommendation of a UN-panel. In favor: The United States.

“The Swedish Federation for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Rights and the Gay and Lesbian Coalition of Quebec are now officially able to have input into United Nations policy. …

“The U.S. was among the nations that voted for the groups’ inclusion. Thomas Jacobson of Focus on the Family says it’s been U.S. policy since last year.”

GWB DRAWS THE LINE TO EXCLUDE PEDOPHILES

“ ‘There was a decision made that the US would support non-governmental organizations that were homosexual and lesbian based as long as there were not direct connections to pedophilia.’

“As NGO’s, the groups will have a say in UN decisions and international policy. ‘They can do enormous damage. The primary battles that we’ve had for years at the UN are over sexual issues and over the construct of the family.’ ” Source: Steve Jordahl, Focus on the Family’s Family News in Focus, 7/30/07

BUSHIES ARE CONSISTENTLY SOFT ON SODOMY

“Austin Ruse, the director of C-Fam, a UN focused pro-family group, responded to the Bush Administration’s decision. ‘We are distressed that the Bush administration continues to cast these votes for radical homosexuals. The vote is to be condemned,’ Ruse told LifeSiteNews.com. Ruse pointed out that this is not the first time that the current administration has chosen to vote in favor of pro-homosexual groups. …

“Asked why he thought that the Bush Administration would [choose] to alienate its supporter base in this way, Ruse responded, ‘There is a large and influential homosexual lobby within the state department.’

“Americans for Truth also issued a statement asking, ‘Why the President would alienate his conservative, pro-family base at this critical juncture. This continues Bush’s misguided policy of recognizing homosexuality-based “rights” organizations at the U.N.’ ” Source: John Jalsevac, www.LifeSiteNews.com, 7/31/07 (Howard Phillips Issues and Strategies Bulletin, Number 819, August 15, 2007, 9520 Bent Creek Lane, Vienna, VA 22182.)

The Reverend Frank Pavone was silent about George Walker Bush's promotion of sodomy from January 20, 2001, to January 20, 2009, and he continues to be silent about former President Donald John Trump's active support for it today.