Sin: More Deadly Than the Coronavirus, part seventeen

Although the plandemicists have retreated somewhat from public view, we are still suffering the effects of their well-orchestrated psychological operation to alter reality and get large numbers of people worldwide to accept a false narrative as being true while concomitantly doing all that they could to assure that people infected with the CCP/Red Chinese/Wuhan/Covid-19/Coronavirus would not receive the treatments that could cure them and working feverishly to unleash a nonstop succession of “vaccines” that are derived from fetal cell lines and have caused untold hundreds of thousands of deaths and injuries.

I. Introduction

The skillful retreat of the most of the plandemicists from public view, however, does not mean that they do not have other plans to lock us down and shut us up in the future, perhaps around election time to make sure that the same means (drop boxes, ballot harvesting, mail-in ballots, mailing in ballots days after an election has been held, etc.) What these merchants of evil have done thus far, however, has been very successful in dividing the world into various castes of people: the mask and the unmasked, the vaccinated and the unvaccinated, the “protected” and the unprotected, the “informed” and the “uninformed,” among other false divisions, and there is still the ongoing effort by the politicized United States Centers for Disease Control and teachers’ unions to keep children unfortunate enough to be placed within America’s concentration camps of ideological programming masked as though they lacked any personal identity and ere just part of a giant collectivity at the disposal of their ideological programmers, something that is the goal of “education” in nations living under the thumb of communism.

Pope Pius XI explained this phenomenon as follows in Divini Illius Magistri, December 31, 1929:

10. Communism, moreover, strips man of his liberty, robs human personality of all its dignity, and removes all the moral restraints that check the eruptions of blind impulse. There is no recognition of any right of the individual in his relations to the collectivity; no natural right is accorded to human personality, which is a mere cog-wheel in the Communist system. In man’s relations with other individuals, besides, Communists hold the principle of absolute equality, rejecting all hierarchy and divinely-constituted authority, including the authority of parents. What men call authority and subordination is derived from the community as its first and only font. Nor is the individual granted any property rights over material goods or the means of production, for inasmuch as these are the source of further wealth, their possession would give one man power over another. Precisely on this score, all forms of private property must be eradicated, for they are at the origin of all economic enslavement .

11. Refusing to human life any sacred or spiritual character, such a doctrine logically makes of marriage and the family a purely artificial and civil institution, the outcome of a specific economic system. There exists no matrimonial bond of a juridico-moral nature that is not subject to the whim of the individual or of the collectivity. Naturally, therefore, the notion of an indissoluble marriage-tie is scouted. Communism is particularly characterized by the rejection of any link that binds woman to the family and the home, and her emancipation is proclaimed as a basic principle. She is withdrawn from the family and the care of her children, to be thrust instead into public life and collective production under the same conditions as man. The care of home and children then devolves upon the collectivity. Finally, the right of education is denied to parents, for it is conceived as the exclusive prerogative of the community, in whose name and by whose mandate alone parents may exercise this right.

12. What would be the condition of a human society based on such materialistic tenets? It would be a collectivity with no other hierarchy than that of the economic system. It would have only one mission: the production of material things by means of collective labor, so that the goods of this world might be enjoyed in a paradise where each would “give according to his powers” and would “receive according to his needs.” Communism recognizes in the collectivity the right, or rather, unlimited discretion, to draft individuals for the labor of the collectivity with no regard for their personal welfare; so that even violence could be legitimately exercised to dragoon the recalcitrant against their wills. In the Communistic commonwealth morality and law would be nothing but a derivation of the existing economic order, purely earthly in origin and unstable in character. In a word. the Communists claim to inaugurate a new era and a new civilization which is the result of blind evolutionary forces culminating in a humanity without God. (Pope Pius XI, Divini Redemptoris, March 19, 1937.)

Distracted by the farce that is and will always be electoral politics as two organized crime families of naturalism (one which is committed to the pursuit of a collectivist agenda while the other is committed simply to the pursuit of its own electoral success) and by the bread and circuses of the world, most people alive today do not realize, do not care or actually support the slow, gradual triumph, albeit temporary until the Triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, of the collectivist/communist mentality in almost every aspect of social life today. This mentality has been proselytized in public and many Catholic elementary and secondary schools, in public, secular and most Catholic colleges and universities, in the fields of law, medicine, “entertainment” (included collegiate and professional athletics), the arts (including literature) and by what still goes by the name of “journalism” but is actually a tool of elitists committed to the obliteration of all concept of “bourgeois” morality and “individuality” in the service of the “global reset," which did not begin with the pladenmic’s Event 201 at the Hotel Saint Pierre in New York, New York, on Friday, October 18, 2019.

Having accustomed large numbers of people, including most of the members of the Supreme Court of the United States of America as presently constituted, around the world to accept the word of alleged “experts,” the elites in charge of shaping public perception of reality have reached the point where the career civil servants must be considered as “infallible” sources of truth on all subjects from whom there can be no legitimate dissent, disagreement, or even a rational exchange of convictions in public debate.

Additionally, our minders in the civil government have been able to bribe various “non-governmental” and even corporate entities to be boosters of its efforts to impose social control in the name of “public health” to fight a disease (and at least one of its variants, see Appendix D below or go to Experts Say Omnicron Likely Came from a Laboratory Too ) that originated as a result gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Red China that was funded in part by Anthony (“I represent science’)  Facui’s National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases that is not fatal in most cases if it is treated properly and not used as an excuse kill off large numbers of people by improper protocols as a means to instill fear and panic into the hearts of ordinary people. These bribes, of course, have meant to encourage recipients to be eager promoters of the various vaccines that killing and injuring untold thousands upon thousands of people (there are lots of sudden deaths in otherwise healthy people taking place now), and they have been documented by the valiant research of Mrs. Randy Engel in a recent expose published on the “AKA Catholic” website.

Here is a brief excerpt from Mrs. Engel’s typically well-researched and documented report that lists some of the recipients of the Federal government’s “stimulus” money during the plandemic:

Grants – 26,000 in number awarded to the following entities (partial listing):

o    States, Governor’s Offices, Departments (Education, Health, and Human Services, etc.)

o    Native American Tribal Governments and Nations (*Grants in the billions of dollars)

o    Physician and Health Care Services

o    Public School Systems and School Boards of Education

o    Government Departments of Family Services

o    Airlines (American, Delta, United, Southwest, etc. – individual grants ranged from $12 billion to $ 700 million). Some airlines received multiple grants.

o    Transit Services

o    Government Departments of Social Services

o    Housing and Community Affairs Agencies

o    Drug Stores and Pharmacies (Walgreen Co., $1 billion; Rite Aid, $507 million)

o    State and Private Universities and Colleges (examples: Duke University, $63 million; Baylor University, $182 million; Rutgers State University, $215 million; Liberty University, $52 million; Cornell University, $36 million; St. John’s University N.Y., $60 million)

o    AIDS Services

o    Government Departments of Child Services

o    Environmental Agencies

o    Guam, U.S. Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, American Samoa 

o    United Nations ($637 million)

o    Bio-Medical Research Centers 

o    Pharmaceutical Companies

o    World Health Organization ($280 million, $773 million)

o    Medical Corporations

o    Family Health International (139 million)

o    Technology Companies – General Dynamics Information Technology ($62 million)

o    Consulting Firms

o    Government Departments of Aging and Disabilities

o    Public Safety Agencies

o    Government Departments of Labor and Employment

o    Catering Services for Airlines aka Gate Gourmet

o    Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services

o    Government Departments of Military Affairs

o    Emergency Management Agencies

o    International Organization for Migration ($50 million)

o    Board of Trustees and Regents at Various Universities

o    International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies ($26 million)

o    Pontifical Catholic University of Puerto Rico ($45 million)

o    Save the Children Federation ($38 million)

o    Task Force for Global Health ($21 million)

o    Pan American Health Organization ($12 million)

Loans: Number in excess of eleven million. There is no designation as to which loans do, or do not, have to be repaid: 

o    First United Methodist Church ($32 million)

o    First Baptist Church ($17 million)

o    Catholic Bishop of Chicago * Cardinal Blase Joseph Cupich ($15,435, 082) 

o    YMCA ($17 million)

o    Trinity Lutheran Church ($14 million)

o    First Presbyterian Church ($14 million)

o    Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations ($10 million)

o    Goodwill Industries ($11 million and multi-local loans in the $10 million range)

o    Muscular Dystrophy Association ($10 million)

o    Salvation Army ($10 million) 

o    Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists ($10 million)

o    Planned Parenthood of Greater New York ($10 million)

o    March of Dimes ($10 million)

o    Los Angeles Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Center ($10 million)

o    Star Tribune Media- Minneapolis, MN ($10 million)

o    Local Medical Clinics (in the $10 million range)

Thousands of non-profits, restaurants, small businesses, and large corporations are listed in the loan category. The above is just a sampling.

Direct Payments: Number about five million, mainly to State and City Governments. Most are in the billion-dollar range, including:

o    State Governments and Executive Offices 

o    Airlines – American Airlines ($9 billion), Delta ($8 billion)

o    United Healthcare Services ($154 billion in direct payments and other contract funding)

o    Native American Tribal Governments and Nations (* Direct payments in the billions of dollars)

Other Financial Assistance – Including the:

o    World Health Organization ($279 million)

o    UNICEF ($204 million)

o    United Nations ($20 million)

o    Native America Tribal Governments and Nations (*Hundreds of grants in the billions of dollars)

Contracts: 15,000 plus in number mainly to hospitals, medical centers, institutes and corporations, pharmaceutical firms. health services, think-tanks, schools of medicine, food conglomerates, systems corporations, consulting firms, university medical schools, supply firms, and “vaccine” manufactures, including:

o    America’s Blood Centers ($523 million)

o    Life Technologies Corporation ($140 million)

o    Merck Corporation ($17million)

o    Pfizer ($37 million)

o    Mayo Clinic ($51 million)

o    Rand Corporation ($5 million)

o    Medline Industries ($9 million)

o    Boeing Company (Multiple outlays of COVID-19 funding including a $105 million contract)

o    Johns Hopkins University ($5 million)

o    St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital ($4 million)

o    Native American Tribal Governments and Nations (*Additional contracts in the millions of dollars) (From Randy Engel, U.S. COVID-19 Relief: Biggest theft in world history     .)

As Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro’s first Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, who as member of William Jefferson Clinton’s junior varsity team during the Monica Lewinsky scandal said, “Never waste a good crisis. (During the Lewinsky scandal, Emanuel, whose brother, Ezekiel Emanuel, has been in the forefront of mismanaging outbreaks of infectious diseases during the Obama administration, said, “Whose truth are you talking about?” when asked about the facts of Clinton’s nefarious behavior and perjured testimony).

Yes, these statists never miss a good crisis to use to fund their favorite ideological causes no matter the cost to the taxpayers as they want to run exorbitantly highly annual Federal budget deficits and thus increase the Federal debt, which now stands at over thirty trillion dollars (see U.S. National Debt Clock) to keep us peons in check as they plot ever more schemes to aggrandize their own power. And, of course, this is to say nothing about the moral debt that this country owes to the true God of Divine Revelation, the Most Blessed Trinity, for its promotion of religious indifferentism, Pelagianism, materialism, egalitarianism, majoritarianism, American exceptionalism (nationalism is the idolatry of one’s country as opposed to patriotism, which wills her good, the ultimate express of which is her Catholicization), usury, and each of the four crimes that cry out to Heaven for vengeance. It is a pretty easy thing to use taxpayer dollars to fund political allies during a manufactured crisis once one has accustomed the people to paying for the slaughter of the preborn by chemical and surgical means.

It is very interesting to note that the Archdiocese of Chicago under the control of Blase “Cardinal” Cupich received a loan of fifteen million dollars because, as noted by Mrs. Engel parenthetically above, Cupich imposed some of the harshest restrictions of any of the conciliar “bishops” anywhere in the world and was more than happy to serve the role as Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr.’s and Anthony Fauci’s stooge in the name of “public health.” Who cares about the evil origins of the “vaccines”? Who cares about the harm that these “vaccines” have done? Not Blase Cupich nor his boss, Jorge Mario Bergoglio, who is himself a willing stooge of the global reset as he worries about “sustainable development goals” but not about the promotion of the four sins that cry out to Heaven for vengeance under the cover of the civil law.

The whole plandemic has been a very well-orchestrated effort to condition people by the use of fear tactics, and it is truly tragic to see human beings still wearing masks as a display of fidelity to “public health experts” and the organized crime family of naturalism to their liking. 

II. A Scam from the Beginning

Dr. Joseph Mercola reviewed the origins of the plandenmic and how the mentality of the plandemicists became embedded in the psyches of so many hundreds of millions of people globally while falsehoods were told about the numbers of people who have actually died from the CCP/Wuhan/China/Red Chinese/Covid-19/Coronavirus:

For the past two years, I and many others have detailed the ways in which COVID-19 deaths have been overcounted to create the illusion of the pandemic being far worse than it actually is.

Now, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and individual states are backtracking on their death statistics, showing we were right all along. Deaths were initially exaggerated for political purposes, and now they’re being downplayed for the same reason.

CDC Removes More Than 72,000 COVID Deaths

As reported by The Defender,1 March 14, 2022, the CDC had removed 72,277 “COVID deaths” from the tally, including 24% of those attributed to children under 18.2,3 They claim a “coding logic error,” a faulty algorithm, had “accidentally” counted deaths that weren’t related to COVID. As reported by Udumbara:4

“Some of the pediatric deaths attributed to COVID-19, according to a search of the CDC’s Wonder system, include deaths where drowning or drug use was listed as the primary cause of death.”

Meanwhile, the CDC used the false death statistics among children to push for COVID shots for 5- to 7-year-olds. In November 2021, CDC director Rochelle Walensky cited that data to justify the recommendation to issue emergency use authorization for the Pfizer shot for this age group.5

Somehow, we’re supposed to believe that it took the CDC two years to realize this error. It’s simply not believable, and The Epoch Times has filed a Freedom of Information Act request for internal communications relating to the data change.6

Ironically, the adjustment comes on the heels of fact-checking articles “debunking” claims that COVID deaths have been overcounted. For example, in early March, Health Feedback claimed there’s “no evidence COVID deaths have been overcounted,” and that “the evidence suggests the opposite.”7 Yet here we are. Deaths were clearly overcounted, not undercounted. That fact check didn’t age well.

CDC Has Been Turned Into a Propaganda Agency

According to Dr. Meryl Nass, a member of the Children’s Health Defense scientific advisory committee, the CDC is cherry-picking data to justify its public health policies, and when it gets caught, it simply blames its “outdated IT systems.” In a March 19, 2022, article, she wrote:8

“CDC is not a public health agency. It is a public propaganda agency that collects a massive amount of data. CDC marshals its huge data library to create presentations that support the current administration’s public health policies …

A 2007 Senate oversight report on the CDC noted the agency spent $106 million on the Thomas R. Harkin Global Communications (and Visitor) Center, and summarized its 115-page report with the following:

‘A review of how an agency tasked with fighting and preventing disease has spent hundreds of millions of tax dollars for failed prevention efforts, international junkets, and lavish facilities, but cannot demonstrate it is controlling disease.’”

Health Officials End Reporting COVID-19 Deaths

Curiously, three months before the CDC started changing its mortality statistics, the U.S. Health and Human Services stopped collecting data on hospitalizations and deaths from COVID-19 altogether. The HHS announced9 changes to the reporting requirements for hospitals and acute care facilities January 6, 2022. The new guidelines, which took effect February 2, note “The retirement of fields which are no longer required to be reported,” which include the “previous day’s COVID-19 deaths.”

What are they trying to hide? Are they stopping the flow of data to prevent examination and analysis? According to some, the HHS hospital data are among the best we have in the U.S., so ending that data collection doesn’t make sense. January 2021, Alex C. Madrigal, co-founder of the COVID Tracking Project, wrote:10

“In a series of analyses that we ran over the past several months, we came to nearly the opposite conclusion of other media outlets. The hospitalization data coming out of HHS are now the best and most granular publicly available data on the pandemic.”

An unnamed federal health official spoke with a reporter from WSWS,11 calling the move to stop reporting COVID-29 hospital deaths “incomprehensible.” The official added:

“It is the only consistent, reliable and actionable dataset at the federal level. Ninety-nine percent of hospitals report 100% of the data every day. I don’t know any scientists who want to have less data.”

Changing Definitions Justify the COVID Narrative

From the start of the pandemic, changing definitions have allowed authorities to manipulate data in whatever way they needed. Now, states are starting to change the way they define a “COVID death,” resulting in lowered mortality rates. In Massachusetts, for example, COVID deaths dropped by 3,700 after the state changed its definition to be in alignment with that of the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists.12

As reported by CBS Boston:13

“The state said currently the COVID death definition includes anyone who has the disease listed as a cause of death on their death certificate. It also includes anyone who had a diagnosis within 60 days but did not have it listed as a cause on their death certificate. Under the new definition, the timeframe is changed to 30 days for people without a COVID diagnosis on their death certificate.”

For the record, counting someone who died of any cause as a COVID death simply because they tested positive within 30 days of their death is still a grossly inaccurate way of determining the true death toll from this virus, because we know PCR tests have a false positive rate of about 97% when run at 35 cycles or greater,14 as was the norm from the start.

Results From At-Home Tests Aren’t Reported

Case counts are also being adjusted downward. In mid-January 2022, the Biden administration started distributing half a billion at-home COVID tests to the American public,15 and the results from those are not being reported anywhere.16 As a result, case counts will be skewed downward. According to 13NewsNow:17

“… the fallibility of case counts is the reason health officials track several COVID-19 metrics, like hospitalizations, deaths, and now, even viral samples in the wastewater18 — metrics that do not necessarily rely on people to go get tested or report the results they get at home.”

And yet the HHS is no longer requiring hospitals to report COVID deaths, which is one of the metrics health officials are supposedly focusing on in lieu of tracking cases. Don’t get me wrong, PCR testing was a scam from the start and I’m not suggesting we should pay much attention to those data. The point here is that the tracking of COVID data has been fatally flawed from the start.

What they’re really trying to do is shift toward passive monitoring, starting with wastewater sampling.19 Eventually, the goal is to monitor every person’s biological processes in real-time, and this is part and parcel of the transhumanist Fourth Industrial Revolution and The Great Reset.

CDC Hides Data

To make matters even murkier, the CDC is also hiding data on COVID hospitalizations and the COVID jab. The stated justification for not making certain data public is that people are “misinterpreting” the data. In other words, the data show that the COVID jabs don’t work, and the CDC doesn’t want that to be widely known.

The CDC has collected data on the effectiveness of COVID-19 boosters, but for some reason did not include the data for 18- to 49-year-olds in any of its publications. ‘Coincidentally,’ this is also the group least likely to benefit from the boosters. As reported by The New York Times,20 the CDC has been withholding data on COVID-19 according to age, race and injection status from the public, even though it’s been collecting it for more than a year.

It has also collected data on the effectiveness of COVID-19 boosters, but for some reason has not included the data for 18- to 49-year-olds in any of its publications. “Coincidentally,” this is “the group least likely to benefit from extra shots,” the Times pointed out, adding:21

“Much of the withheld information could help state and local health officials better target their efforts to bring the virus under control. Detailed, timely data on hospitalizations by age and race would help health officials identify and help the populations at highest risk. Information on hospitalizations and death by age and vaccination status would have helped inform whether healthy adults needed booster shots.”

COVID Has Served a Purely Political Agenda

Over the past two years, the pandemic has been used to usher in a range of radical changes that would never have been accepted were it not for widespread panic. It was used to implement illegitimate voting rules, which appear to have had an impact on the 2020 elections.

It was used to announce the urgent need for a “Great Reset” and a Fourth Industrial Revolution. It’s been used to strip people of basic human rights, and to justify radical environmental policies that will result in lower standards of living.

It was also used to abruptly transition the vaccine industry from conventional vaccine manufacturing using eggs to the use of risky gene transfer technology. The only thing the pandemic has not been used for is to make recommendations that actually improve public health. And throughout, data have been massaged and manipulated to justify the unjustifiable.

Now, it appears data are being manipulated yet again — this time to artificially end the COVID crisis so that the Biden administration can take credit for it during the upcoming elections. As stated in a February 24, 2022, letter from Impact Research, titled “Taking the Win Over COVID-19”:22,23

“It’s time for Democrats to take credit for ending the COVID crisis phase of the COVID war, point to important victories like vaccine distribution and providing economic stability for Americans, and fully enter the rebuilding phase that comes after any war. Below we lay out some strategic thoughts for Democrats positioning themselves on COVID-19 …”

Strategic positioning includes declaring the crisis phase over; pushing for “feeling and acting more normal;” and taking the side of people who are burned out on COVID and don’t want to hear about it anymore. Not setting a standard of zero COVID as the “victory condition,” and to “stop talking about restrictions and the unknown future ahead.”

“If Democrats continue to hold a posture that prioritizes COVID precautions over learning how to live in a world where COVID exists, but does not dominate, they risk paying dearly for it in November,” the letter states.24

Dr. Anthony Fauci perhaps did not receive this memo, as he is out there signaling that we can expect a return to COVID restrictions at any given point. In a mid-March CNN interview, he stated that “we need to be flexible” and “if we see a resurgence, we have to be able to pivot and go back to any degree of mitigation that is commensurate with what the situation is. We can’t just say ‘We’re done, now we’re going to move on.’”

Based on what we’ve seen so far, I wouldn’t be surprised if this “pivot” back into COVID crisis mode were to occur right before the midterm elections. (How the Pandemic Was Fabricated.)

Anthony Fauci helped to create the “pandemic,” which he “predicted” in late-2017 in an address at Georgetown University might occur during the administration of President Donald John Trump:

‘If there’s one message that I want to leave with you today that is based on my experience… there is no question that there will be a challenge [for] the coming administration in the arena of infectious diseases.

‘But also there will be a surprise outbreak…there is no doubt in anyone’s mind [the administration] will be faced with challenges their predecessors were faced with.’  

Dr. Fauci, who served under five presidential administrations, later added that he cautioned former President George W. Bush to be more concerned with a potential ‘influenza pandemic’ than bioterrorism. 

‘I worry more about the natural occurrence of an influenza pandemic and the ongoing plague of HIV than I do about a bio-terror attack,’ he said, adding that people should pay attention to natural causes.  

In regards to the Trump administration, Fauci mentioned possible challenges that included a resurgence in the Zika Virus or a new flu pandemic.

He said: ‘What is for sure…history has told us definitively that it will happen because infectious diseases [are] a perpetual challenge.’ (Fauci Revealed His Fears of a "Surprise Outbreak" Three Years Before the Pandemic.)

Anthony Fauci had worked with the Wuhan Institute of Vriology BSL-4 on "gain of function" studies for at least four years prior to that talk at Georgetown University four years, four months ago. 

A new flu pandemic?

In like manner, Anthony Fauci, after whom a science hall at his baccalaureate alma mater, the College of the Holy Cross in Worchester, Massachusetts, is being renamed (see Holy Cross to Name Science Complex for Dr. Anthony Fauci), is tipping is hand once again by explaining that us poor peons in the peasant class should not become blasé about the Wuhan/Red China/Chinese/Covid-19/Coronavirus as there are other pathogens that could cause another “pandemic” later this year that would necessitate another round of lockdowns and travel restrictions:

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, warned Americans this week that they could soon face additional COVID-19 lockdown measures should a new strain of the virus cause case numbers to increase.

Fauci, who also serves as an adviser to President Biden, said the BA.2 subvariant could soon increase the rate of infections in America. He suggested that Americans should "be able to pivot" back and forth between a more common way of life and the measures that were taken in an attempt to slow the spread of the virus at the height of the pandemic.

"If in fact, we do see a turnaround and a resurgence, we have to be able to pivot and go back to any degree of mitigation that is commensurate with what the situation is," Fauci said Thursday during an interview with CNN.

We can't just say, 'We're done. We're going to move on.' We've got to be able to be flexible because we're dealing with a dynamic situation," he added, noting the new variant to be less fatal than the Omicron variant. "The overall mortality is actually down. It’s a very interesting situation where the cases are going up, but it does not, at this point in time, appear to be any degree of severity."

Fauci said he "would not be surprised in the next few weeks, given the fact that we’ve begun to open up, and we have an increase in the BA.2 variant, that we’ll be seeing an increase in cases."

During the segment, Fauci seemingly dismissed concern over the crippling economic burdens associated with lockdown measures or other precautions.

A Johns Hopkins University meta-analysis of several studies in February found that lockdowns during the first COVID-19 wave in the spring of 2020 only reduced COVID-19 mortality by .2% in the U.S. and Europe.

"While this meta-analysis concludes that lockdowns have had little to no public health effects, they have imposed enormous economic and social costs where they have been adopted," the researchers wrote. "In consequence, lockdown policies are ill-founded and should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument."

A study from the National Commission on COVID-19 and Criminal Justice last year found that domestic violence incidents increased 8.1% in the U.S. after lockdown orders were issued.

There have also been additional medical concerns over the impacts of lockdown measures.

The New England Journal of Medicine reviewed the psychological impact of people in quarantine, finding "numerous emotional outcomes, including stress, depression, irritability, insomnia, fear, confusion, anger, frustration, boredom and stigma associated with quarantine, some of which persisted after the quarantine was lifted."

Fauci has faced criticism after he shifted positions and contradicted himself on a number of guidelines, including the usage of face masks and the threat of COVID-19 in America.

Over the past day, the U.S. recorded 52,884 new coronavirus cases, as well as 1,685 deaths, according to Johns Hopkins University.  (Fauci warns Americans could face more lockdowns amid spread of new COVID-19 variant.)

 

Anthony Fauci is an insidious little man who delights in the economic pain the lockdowns imposed and in the worshipful celebrity status that he has attained in leftist circles. Just as the first round of the plandemic under President Trump, who gave Fauci carte blanche to do everything possible to undermine his administration’s economic achievements, came during Trump’s bid for re-election, so is it likely, as Dr. Mercola pointed out that the next round may come close to the 2022 Congressional midterm elections to keep voters angry with Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr., away from the polls.

III. More Vaccines at the Ready as the Toll of the Dead and Injured Continue to Rise

The jab-happy Fauci, who lives in an alternative universe populated by his fellow elitists, is cooperating with his confederates in Big Pharma to develop no fewer than twenty different vaccines to deal with the “outbreaks” of alleged variations of the Wuhan/Red China/Covid-19/Coronavirus that they envision (plan?) will occur perpetually:

  • At a virtual meeting held the first day of the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) Davos Agenda 2022, Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel and colleagues, including Dr. Anthony Fauci, detailed their plans for “vaccine mania” to persist indefinitely.
  • Moderna is actively working with “Fauci’s team” to create a new shot for fall 2022. Moderna is also developing an Omicron-specific jab that they hope to release as early as March 2022.
  • Moderna is planning to combine multiple shots, such as a COVID-19 shot, a flu shot and a respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) shot, into one injection — coming in 2023 — to help avoid “compliance issues.”
  • An agreement between Pfizer and BioNTech to develop the first mRNA shingles vaccine was reached in January 2022.
  • Additional shots are in development to target HIV, zika virus, Nipah virus, cancer, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus, influenza (mRNA) and more.

Many experts have sounded the alarm that the COVID-19 pandemic was all about the shot and a larger agenda to impose totalitarian control worldwide. Already, one shot has turned into two doses and a third booster.

A fourth booster is also being discussed, including by Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel, who said that the efficacy of the third shot is likely to decline over several months, necessitating another shot soon thereafter.

“I will be surprised when we get that data in the coming weeks that it’s holding nicely over time — I would expect that it’s not going to hold great,” Bancel said in an interview with Goldman Sachs.

Conveniently, Moderna is working on an Omicron-specific jab that they hope to release as early as March 2022 — and this is only the beginning.

Writing on Substack, contributor Eugyppius explained:

“Moderna, just one of multiple pharmaceuticals eager to exploit our new vaccine mania, are expanding their manufacturing capacity to produce as many as 6 billion mRNA vaccine doses per year.”

The information came straight from the horse’s mouth, at a virtual meeting held the first day of the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) Davos Agenda 2022, at a session titled “COVID-19: What’s Next?”

Along with Bancel, the meeting was attended by Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Richard Hatchett, CEO of the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, and professor Annelies Wilder-Smith from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, who together detailed their plans for “vaccine mania” to persist indefinitely.

Combined shots planned to avoid ‘compliance issues’

During the discussion, Bancel states that Moderna is actively preparing for “what should the vaccine be in the fall of 2022, and what should it contain.” The company is “working with public health experts like Fauci’s team to figure this out. Because soon we’re going to have to decide what goes into the vaccine for fall of 2022,” he said (6.25).

Fauci’s NIAID is part of the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), which, some may be surprised to learn, actually owns half the patent for Moderna’s COVID-19 injection.

In fact, the NIH owns thousands of pharmaceutical patents, and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention spends $4.9 billion a year out of its $12 billion budget buying and distributing vaccines.

“Tony Fauci was able to choose, to designate, four of his high-level employees who each get individual patent shares,” according to Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in an interview with James Corbett. “They will collect $150,000 a year for life if the Moderna vaccine is approved, which it has been.” (8:31)

In addition to working closely with Fauci, Moderna is planning to combine multiple shots, such as a COVID-19 shot, a flu shot and a respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) shot, into one injection — coming in 2023 — to help avoid “compliance issues.” Fauci said:

“The other piece we’re working on is for 2023, is how do we make it possible from a societal standpoint that people want to be vaccinated?

“And we’re going to do this by preparing combinations, we’re working on the flu vaccine, we’re working on an RSV vaccine, and our goal is to be able to have a single annual booster, so that we don’t have compliance issues, where people don’t want to get two to three shots a winter, but they get one dose, where they get a booster for corona, and a booster for flu and RSV, to make sure that people get their vaccine.”

When asked how soon this would occur, he continued (7:20):

“So the RSV program is now in Phase 3, the flu program is in Phase 2 and soon in Phase 3, I hope as soon as second quarter of this year. So the best case scenario would be the fall of 2023, as a best case scenario, I don’t think it would [be available] in every country, but we believe it’s possible to operate in some countries next year.”

Vaccines for at least 20 pathogens in the works

SARS-Cov-2 isn’t the only virus that Moderna and other pharmaceutical companies, along with health officials, are intent on targeting with more shots. Remember the zika virus, which Kennedy described as another pandemic fabricated for the purpose of selling pharmaceuticals and advancing totalitarian control? (34:10) There’s a vaccine on the way.

How about Nipah virus? Nipah virus, a zoonotic pathogen for which no treatments exist, is the inspiration for the film “Contagion.” The virus can only be experimented on in BSL-4 laboratories. As an aside, the National Bio and Agro-Defence Facility in Kansas will be the first biocontainment facility in the U.S. where research on Nipah (and Ebola) can be conducted on livestock.

In 2019, Nipah Malaysia was also among the deadly virus strains shipped from Canada’s National Microbiology Lab to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. If you haven’t heard of Nipah yet, you likely will soon — another vaccine is in the works for it. Bancel said (43.45):

“We’re working with Dr. Fauci’s team, we’re working with Richard [Hatchett], to work on many more pathogens … The entire scientific community has known for years that there’s at least around 20-ish pathogens that are a risk for which we need vaccines, you know we have zika vaccine in Phase 2 … we’re working on a Nipah vaccine, those are viruses that not everybody has heard of.

“Because we need to have the data. What dose, what construct from a genetic standpoint is required … so that if a new pathogen emerges from that family we can very quickly move into a Phase 3.”

More mRNA shots are coming

Many other vaccines are also under development, including a Phase 3 study looking at combining Pfizer’s COVID-19 injection with their Prevnar 20™ (pneumococcal 20-valent conjugate vaccine) for adults aged 65 and older.

In a related news release, Kathrin U. Jansen, Ph.D., senior vice president and head of vaccine research and development at Pfizer spoke about the importance of “raising awareness of the importance of adult” vaccinations, echoing Bancel in their desire to create combination shots so adults can get multiple vaccines at one doctor or pharmacy visit.

“As the COVID-19 vaccines and booster doses continue to be administered, we believe that health care providers have an opportunity to talk to their adult patients about other recommended vaccines in line with CDC guidance,” she said.

An agreement between Pfizer and BioNTech to develop the first mRNA shingles vaccine was also reached in January 2022. According to a Pfizer news release:

“While there are currently approved vaccines for shingles, there is an opportunity to develop an improved vaccine that potentially shows high efficacy and better tolerability, and is more efficient to produce globally, by utilizing mRNA technology.”

A Phase 1 study by Moderna for its mRNA Epstein-Barr virus shot is also underway. The first dose of the experimental shot was given to a study subject Jan. 5. In a news release, Moderna detailed their intent on rolling out additional mRNA vaccines against a number of additional viruses as well:

“The start of this Phase 1 study is a significant milestone as we continue to advance mRNA vaccines against latent viruses, which remain in the body for life after infection and can lead to chronic medical conditions. Moderna is committed to developing a portfolio of first-in-class vaccines against latent viruses for which there are no approved vaccines today, including vaccines against CMV [cytomegalovirus], EBV and HIV.

“Our research team is working to bring even more vaccines against latent viruses to the clinic. We believe these vaccines could have a profound impact on quality of health for hundreds of millions of people around the world.”

Other mRNA shots also in development include:

  • An mRNA cancer vaccine for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
  • mRNA influenza shots, which are under development by several companies, including Pfizer, Moderna, Sanofi and Translate Bio.
  • An mRNA HIV vaccine, one of which is being studied by Moderna in collaboration with the NIH.
  • Various additional mRNA cancer vaccines, including one targeting advanced melanoma — being developed by BioNTech and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals — and several being developed by Moderna, targeting melanoma, NSCLC, colorectal cancer and pancreatic cancer.

Ramping up production for billions of doses

In case there were any doubts that the powers that be intend to use injections as an increasingly integral part of your health care routine and daily life, Bancel described plans for billions of doses of shots to be manufactured in a matter of months. He said during the WEF session (43:45):

“The other piece is manufacturing. If you look in 2020, we were able to ship 20 million doses to the U.S. government when the vaccine was authorized. That is not a lot.

“But this year we’re going to have 2 to 3 billion doses of capacity in a six-month timeframe, which is what I believe it will take us to get authorization of a vaccine, if all the work has been done before … you could have 1.5 billion doses available in six months, and that’s just from Moderna. And you have other platforms, it could be a much bigger number …”

With censorship now so pervasive, and Big Tech colluding with dictators and pharmaceutical companies to bury the harms occurring through these experimental vaccines — including death — it’s now more important than ever to let your voice be heard in support of medical freedom and opposition of government health officials intimidating, threatening and coercing citizens to violate their conscientiously-held beliefs.

The ethical principle of informed consent to medical risk taking, which includes the legal right to make voluntary decisions about getting experimental injections, must be protected. For now, however, as Eugyppius explained:

“The vaccinators are a great sword of Damocles over our heads. As I type this, they are scouring the earth for the novel pathogens their products require, and they, together with their bureaucratic and academic allies, will do their level best to call into being new pandemic scares and vaccination campaigns whenever possible — pebiorhaps every flu season.” (‘Vaccine Mania’: Fauci, Big Pharma Detail Plans for ‘Indefinite’ Rollout of Shots.)

The vaccinators pretend as though the harm they are causing does not exist even though they know that it is real, which is why they are trying to bury the truth as it is their intention to cause depopulate the planet in the name of “transhumanism,” which is a vital goal of the likes of Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. Transhumanism is serious gnostic business, and it is something that Catholics, especially true bishops and priests, should take seriously when considering the abject immorality of the vaccines even apart from the illicit source from which they are derived, namely, human embryonic kidney cell lines:

According to Klaus Schwab, founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum (WEF), the goal of The Fourth Industrial Revolution1 is to change what it means to be human by merging man and machine. In short, while the term “transhumanism” is not being used, that’s exactly where the global cabal intends to take us, willing or not.

In a November 2019 interview with CNN,2 history professor and bestselling author Yuval Noah Harari, a Klaus Schwab disciple, warned that “humans are now hackable animals,” meaning, the technology now exists by which a company or government can know you better than you know yourself, and that can be very dangerous if misused.

He predicted that algorithms will increasingly be used to make decisions that historically have been made by humans, either yourself or someone else, including whether or not you’ll be hired for a particular job, whether you’ll be granted a loan, what scholastic curriculum you will follow and even who you will marry.

Profound Dangers Ahead

There’s also an ever-increasing risk of being manipulated by these outside forces that you’re not even fully aware of. Looking back over the last two years, it’s rather easy to confirm that mass manipulation is taking place at a staggering scale, and that it’s phenomenally effective.

As noted by Harari in 2019,3 the available capabilities already go far beyond Orwell’s “1984” authoritarian vision, and it’s only going to become more powerful from here. He’s certain that in short order, there will be the ability to monitor your emotional state through something as simple as a wearable wristband.

You may dutifully smile and clap when listening to a speech by a government official, but they’ll know you’re angry or don’t agree with what’s being said, and could therefore take action against you based on your most personal, internal emotions rather than what you outwardly express.

Importantly, Harari warned that if we allow the establishment of this kind of digital dictatorship, where the system, be it a corporation or a government, knows the most intimate details about each and every person, it will be impossible to dismantle it. Its control will be total and irreversible. And, Harari believes we may have only a decade, at most two, to prevent this digital dictatorship from taking over.

Reengineering Life Itself

Harari also discussed the coming transhumanism at the WEF’s 2020 annual meeting in Davos (above), and in this speech, he went even further. Not only does the global elite have the technological capability to create a global digital dictatorship, but “elites may gain the power to reengineer the future of life itself.”

“For four billion years, nothing fundamental changed in the basic rules of the game of life,” he said. “All of life was subject to the laws of natural selection and the laws of organic biochemistry. But this is now about to change.

Science is replacing evolution by natural selection with evolution by intelligent design, not the intelligent design of some god in the clouds, [but] OUR intelligent design, and the design of our ‘clouds,’ the IBM cloud, the Microsoft cloud. These are the new driving forces of evolution.”

It’s hard to determine whether Harari is for or against transhumanism. He speaks of it as an inevitability, and something that can be used for tremendous good. But he also recognizes its profound dangers, and seems to believe we need to discuss how these technological capabilities can be used, and whether they should.

In the featured Davos speech, it sounds as though he’s a proponent of this human intelligent design venture, but in his 2019 interview with CNN, he also stated that “we must never underestimate the stupidity of humans.” The fact that we have the technology to design new life forms, including new kinds of humans, does not necessarily mean that we’re smart enough to design something better than what natural evolution has come up with thus far.

In his Davos speech, Harari also pointed out that science is now enabling us to create life not only in the organic realm but in the inorganic realm as well. We’re talking about “living” robots and the like. He also raises the question as to who “owns” your DNA, if it can be charted and hacked. Does it belong to you, a corporation, or the government?

‘The Days of Free Will Are Over’

Whatever Harari’s true feelings about transhumanism, he emphatically states that the idea that we have a soul and free will, those days “are over.” In other clips that have been inserted into the featured video, Harari predicts that in the future, people will be able to look back and see that the COVID pandemic was the turning point where biological surveillance took over and became norm.

The explanation for how that was able to occur is given by Schwab, who has publicly admitted (see featured video) that participants in the WEF’s Young Global Leaders program have “penetrated the cabinets” of many world governments.

In Canada, for example, about half the politicians, including Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, have taken Schwab’s training. Schwab is all about ushering in transhumanism and changing what it means to be human, and his minions of global leaders are sure doing everything they can to make those dreams a reality. This is a dystopian future WEF and its global allies are actively trying to implement, whether humanity at large agrees with it or not.

Changing What It Means To Be Human

Schwab dreams of a world in which humans are connected to the cloud, able to access the internet through their own brains. This, of course, also means that your brain would be accessible to people who might like to tinker with your thoughts, emotions, beliefs and behavior, be they the technocratic elite themselves or random hackers.

If you believe that your thoughts and behavior are and always will remain under your own control, think again. We already have the technology to directly alter thoughts, emotions and behavior. Some of these capabilities are described in a 2021 project report by the U.K. Ministry of Defense, created in partnership with the German Bundeswehr Office for Defense Planning.

Human augmentation can ‘directly enhance behavior.’ And if you can change a person’s behavior in a positive way, you can also control it to the person’s own detriment.

The report, “Human Augmentation — The Dawn of a New Paradigm, a Strategic Implications Project,”4 reviews the scientific goals of the U.K. and German defense ministries, and they are precisely what the title suggests. Human augmentation is stressed as being a key area to focus on in order to win future wars:5

“Human augmentation will become increasingly relevant, partly because it can directly enhance human capability and behavior and partly because it is the binding agent between people and machines.”

Key words I’d like to draw your attention to are the affirmation that human augmentation can “directly enhance behavior.” If you can enhance behavior, that means you can change someone’s behavior. And if you can change a person’s behavior in a positive way, you can also control it to the person’s own detriment.

Theoretically, absolutely anyone, any random civilian with a brain-to-cloud connection and the needed biological augmentation (such as strength or speed) could be given wireless instructions to carry out an assassination, for example, and pull it off flawlessly, even without prior training.

Alternatively, their physical body could temporarily be taken over by a remote operator with the prerequisite skills. Proof of concept already exists, and is reviewed by Dr. Charles Morgan, professor in the department of national security at the University of New Haven, in the lecture below. Using the internet and brain implants, thoughts can be transferred from one person to another. The sender can also directly influence the physical movements of the receiver.

Project Immortality

Historically, the striving for immortality has been a faith-based venture, based in the idea that the soul is immortal while the body perishes, which is a concept I am in complete alignment with. Transhumanists more or less reverse this idea. They discard the notion of soul altogether and aim for the preservation of the perceived personality, first through radical life extension of the physical body, and later through the transfer of brain data into a replacement form.

According to Dmitry Itskov, the Russian founder of the Immortality 2045 project,6 only 2% of people are ready to accept death — a statistic that he uses to justify the search for immortality through things like artificial organs, artificial body constructs, the simulation of mental processes and, ultimately, the transferring of one’s mind into an artificial carrier.

The goals of this project include not only the creation of the cybernetic technologies needed to achieve an immortal body, but also the creation of “a new philosophical paradigm for humanity.” Schwab has talked about the same thing, using the term “social contract” rather than “philosophical paradigm.”

The Immortality 2045’s vision, published in 2011, starts with the creation of the first robotic copy of a human body that can be remotely controlled by 2020. By 2025, they want an avatar into which the human brain can be transplanted at the end of life. By 2035, they want an avatar with a synthetic brain, into which the human personality can be transferred and, by 2045, they imagine a holographic-like avatar. Itskov says:7

“The aim of the first project, known as ‘Avatar,’ is the creation of a robot copy of a human being controllable through a ‘brain-computer’ interface. When I’m asked to give the gist of this project, I tell people to recall the film ‘Surrogates,’ which depicts a world in which every person has an artificial body that he controls remotely.

The makers of that blockbuster put an accent on the negative side of such a scenario. Nonetheless, the film’s highly graphic demonstration of the idea allows one to get an immediate sense of what it is.”

Does living through an avatar sound like a life devoid of spirituality to you? Not so, Itskov says, because by ending our dependency on our physical bodies, “many things will open up spiritually.” I have my doubts about that, as most spiritual adepts will tell you that being hooked on technology tends to hinder rather than elevate spiritual pursuits, which are most easily achieved by living simply, in close contact with the natural world.

I just don’t foresee being able to elevate spiritually when any number of outside parties can access your brain and dictate what you think, feel and believe. Transhumanists like Itskov tend to focus only on the perceived benefits of synthetic life. For example, he promises that his avatars will be affordable for everyone who wants them, regardless of income bracket.

Yet the WEF has clearly announced that by 2030, nobody will own anything, and while not clearly stated, that will likely even include your own body. So, to think that your avatar would be “yours” is probably unrealistic.

 

Looked at through the lens of the WEF’s Fourth Industrial Revolution, it seems the plan is for the elite to literally own all of humanity, which will be refashioned to their own liking. And, if people can be hacked and controlled remotely, then we can be sure they will be. That’s particularly true for synthetic or mechanical avatars that can’t “live” or remain “conscious” without a cloud connection.

Resource to Understand the Transhuman Agenda — Blockchained

Corey Lynn is a top-notch investigative journalist who covers topics the mainstream won’t touch, including the transhumanist agenda. On her website, Corey’s Digs,8 you can find select chapters from her book, “Global Landscape on Vaccine ID Passports.”

Chapter 4 in the book is titled “Blockchained,” which explains what digital identity is all about. Digital ID is not just a piece of identification, with which you can prove who you are. It will collect and monitor ALL of your data, from your personal finances, education, work history, GPS location 24/7, everything you’ve ever typed on your computer, your search history, social media presence, emotional status and physical biometrics, down to your DNA.

I will only cover a minor part of that chapter here, the part on human augmentation and artificial intelligence (AI), so for more, be sure to browse through her website or, better yet, read her book, which can be purchased on her site. The digital PDF is only $9.95 and a print copy is $19.95.

Big Data, Data Sharing and AI

Make no mistake, transhumanism is the ultimate goal of the technocratic elite, and both “big data” and AI are integral components of that. Without one or both of those, the transhumanist dream is dead in the water. The goal of transhumanism is undoubtedly why there’s been so much focus on those two areas in the first place.

So, remember, data gathering, data sharing and AI are not about making your life more convenient. They’re to make you obsolete. The intention is to replace you with a synthetic copy of you that can be remotely controlled.

In 2021, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), an intergovernmental organization that consists of 38 countries that work with various working groups and policy makers, issued a report on the “State of Implementation of the OECD AI principles.” So far, 46 countries have adopted these AI principles.

The strategy is to develop centralized repositories of public datasets in each country, and then enable public-private data sharing to build a vast network where each dataset is connected with all the others.

Biosecurity Will Be Used to Justify Surveillance Tyranny

Another report, by the National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence (NSCAI), founded “to advance the development of artificial intelligence” and “comprehensively address the national security and defense needs of the United States,” highlights the need to combat digital disinformation and prioritizing biosecurity.

To help with that, a U.S. government-funded supercomputer is being set up at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory under the direction of the Department of Energy. This AI supercomputer can do more than 1 quintillion calculations per second.

Some of this data sharing is already taking place. As noted by Corey, NATO launched an in-house biometrics system for data sharing between nations in November 2020, and in May 2021, the U.S. military merged its biometrics-enabled watch list with the Department of Defense’s automated biometric identification system (ABIS).

“They are working on multi-modal fusion matching and improving biometric face-matching capability through AI and machine learning, and have already improved their long-range infrared cameras,” Corey writes. “Looking toward the near future, they are also focused on palm print biometrics, faces in crowds, integration to identify threats online, and non-traditional latent DNA collection.” (What You Need to Know About the Transhumanist Agenda.)

Fools.

Even Dr. Mercola is to be faulted for saying that he "aligns" with a faith-based immorality.

Excuse me?

Adam was created with a rational, immortal soul. The soul is the animating priciple of the human being. The sin of our first parents, introduced Original Sin into the world, among whose punishments is the death of the body The body will rise up again only on the Last Day at the General Judgment of the living and the dead to be glorified for all eternity in Heaven by virtue of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ's Easter victory over the power of sin and death that he wrought for us during His Passion and Death on the wood of the Holy Cross on Good Friday, the most solemn day of the year if one's soul was in a state of Sanctifying Grace as a member of the Catholic Church at the time of bodily death. If not, though, the body will rise up to be sent into the flames of hell to deprived of the very end for which it was created--that is, to enjoy the Beatific Vision of God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost for all eternity in Heaven--and to tormented in numerous and quite particular ways according to the nature of one's own sins for all eternity without relief, without cease.

Transhumanism is diabolical. It is the stuff of Antichrist, but this is what the plademicists support as they remain completely unfazed even by the official statists on the Centers for Disease Control Vaccine Adverse Effects Reporting System that are collected and analyzed by the Children’s Health Defense:

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) today released new data showing a total of 1,205,755 reports of adverse events following COVID vaccines were submitted between Dec. 14, 2020, and March 25, 2022, to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). VAERS is the primary government-funded system for reporting adverse vaccine reactions in the U.S.

The data included a total of 26,396 reports of deaths — an increase of 337 over the previous week — and 214,521 of serious injuries, including deaths, during the same time period — up 2,937 compared with the previous week.

Excluding “foreign reports” to VAERS, 799,732 adverse events, including 12,103 deaths and 78,227 serious injuries, were reported in the U.S. between Dec. 14, 2020, and March 25, 2022.

Foreign reports are reports foreign subsidiaries send to U.S. vaccine manufacturers. Under U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations, if a manufacturer is notified of a foreign case report that describes an event that is both serious and does not appear on the product’s labeling, the manufacturer is required to submit the report to VAERS.

Of the 12,103 U.S. deaths reported as of March 25, 17% occurred within 24 hours of vaccination, 21% occurred within 48 hours of vaccination and 59% occurred in people who experienced an onset of symptoms within 48 hours of being vaccinated.

 

In the U.S., 559 million COVID vaccine doses had been administered as of March 18, including 330 million doses of Pfizer, 210 million doses of Moderna and 19 million doses of Johnson & Johnson (J&J).

Every Friday, VAERS publishes vaccine injury reports received as of a specified date. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a causal relationship can be confirmed.

Historically, VAERS has been shown to report only 1% of actual vaccine adverse events.

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to March 25, 2022, for 5- to 11-year-olds show:

  • 9,771 adverse events, including 234 rated as serious and 5 reported deaths. The most recent death involves a 7-year-old boy (VAERS I.D. 2152560) from Washington who died 13 days after receiving his first dose of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine when he went into shock and suffered cardiac arrest. He was unable to be resuscitated and died in the emergency department.
  • 17 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis (heart inflammation). The CDC uses a narrowed case definition of “myocarditis,” which excludes cases of cardiac arrest, ischemic strokes and deaths due to heart problems that occur before one has the chance to go to the emergency department.
  • 37 reports of blood clotting disorders.

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to March 25, 2022, for 12- to 17-year-olds show:

  • 30,771 adverse events, including 1,771 rated as serious and 43 reported deaths.
    The most recent death involves a 17-year-old boy (VAERS I.D. 2189006) from Georgia who “suddenly died in his sleep” six months after receiving his second dose of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine. The boy had an autopsy but the results were not disclosed. He had no underlying health conditions.
  • 68 reports of anaphylaxis among 12- to 17-year-olds where the reaction was life-threatening, required treatment or resulted in death — with 96% of cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.
  • 650 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis, with 638 cases attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine.
  • 165 reports of blood clotting disorders, with all cases attributed to Pfizer.

U.S. VAERS data from Dec. 14, 2020, to March 25, 2022, for all age groups combined, show:

Woman dies from rare brain disorder after second Pfizer shot

In an exclusive interview with The Defender, Richard Sprague said his wife, Jennifer, developed Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD) after her second Pfizer shot and died within five months of the second dose.

Jennifer, a healthy 60-year-old woman from Missouri, experienced her first “event she couldn’t explain” four days after receiving the second Pfizer dose. Over the following weeks, her symptoms worsened until she could no longer work, pour coffee or walk without assistance.

Jennifer was later hospitalized and diagnosed with CJD, a fatal prion disease that causes degeneration of the brain. Her health rapidly deteriorated until she could no longer sit up on her own or communicate.

When Jennifer’s insurance would no longer cover her injury, she was placed on hospice and sent home. She died Feb. 21.

Sprague, who remains unvaccinated, encouraged others to avoid COVID vaccines unless they have full knowledge of potential adverse events and an understanding that the vaccine is experimental.

Heart damage found in teens months after second Pfizer shot

A new peer-reviewed study published March 25 in the Journal of Pediatrics showed more than two-thirds of adolescents with COVID vaccine-related myopericarditis had persistent heart abnormalities months after their initial diagnosis — raising concerns for potential long-term effects.

Researchers at Seattle Children’s Hospital reviewed cases that occurred between April 1, 2021, and Jan. 7, 2022, of patients younger than 18 who presented to the hospital with chest pain and an elevated serum troponin level within one week of receiving a second dose of Pfizer’s vaccine.

While 35 patients fit the criteria, 19 were excluded for various reasons. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the remaining 16 patients was performed three to eight months after they were first examined.

The MRIs showed 11 had persistent abnormal findings and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), although levels were lower than in previous months.

According to the study, “The presence of LGE is an indicator of cardiac injury and fibrosis and has been strongly associated with worse prognosis in patients with classical acute myocarditis.”

Pfizer’s COVID vaccine less effective against Omicron for children 12 and older

Pfizer’s COVID vaccine showed “reduced effectiveness” against the Omicron variant among children 12 and older, according to a study published Wednesday in The New England Journal of Medicine.

The study, funded by the CDC, involved 1,185 patients, 88% of whom were unvaccinated.

During the “Delta-predominant period” (July 1 to Dec. 18, 2021), researchers reported vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization for COVID among adolescents 12 to 18 years old was 93% two to 22 weeks after vaccination.

During the “Omicron-predominant period” (Dec. 19, 2021, to Feb. 17), among adolescents in the same age group, vaccine effectiveness fell to 40% against hospitalization for COVID, 79% against critical COVID and 20% against noncritical COVID. This group’s median interval since vaccination was 162 days.

The study did not assess effectiveness of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine against the BA.2 Omicron sub-variant, which is now the most dominant strain in the U.S.

Incurable neurological disorder, aphasia, linked to COVID vaccines

News Wednesday that actor Bruce Willis was diagnosed with aphasia, requiring him to “step away” from his career, cast a spotlight on the incurable neurological disorder, which has also been linked to COVID-19 and COVID vaccines.

According to the National Institute of Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, aphasia is a disorder that results from damage to areas of the brain responsible for language.

The condition often occurs suddenly, but frequently follows a stroke or head injury, or could occur as a result of a brain tumor or progressive neurological disease.

Although The Defender found no evidence Willis’ diagnosis is linked to either COVID or COVID vaccines, reports of aphasia following the vaccine continue to pile up in VAERS.

In 2019, there were only 52 cases of aphasia reported to VAERS for all vaccines combined.

According to the latest data, between Dec. 14, 2020, and March 25, 2022, there were 3,079 cases of aphasia reported following COVID vaccines, with 342 cases occurring in those aged 65 to 74.

Moderna weighing vax for kids under 6

Moderna last week said it will seek Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for its COVID-19 pediatric vaccine, after announcing its two-dose regimen reduced cases of symptomatic disease by 43.7% in children 6 months to 2 years old and by 35.7% in children ages 2 to 6.

The company said its Phase 2/3 KidCOVE study of its mRNA-1273 in children “successfully met its primary endpoint.”

However, as Politico reported Wednesday, and as experts told The Defender, some doctors and scientists question whether Moderna’s clinical trial data will be sufficient for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to grant EUA for the vaccine.

Experts cited the trials’, small sample size, low efficacy rates and reliance on a research workaround called immunobridging as weaknesses that could hinder Moderna’s case.

“Given the other data that surrounds it, I don’t know that it’s a slam dunk that the FDA will move forward in terms of releasing it for emergency use,” Peter Hotez, professor of pediatrics and molecular virology and microbiology at the Baylor College of Medicine, told Politico.

“We’re still learning about the relationship between virus-neutralizing antibodies and effectiveness,” Hotez said, adding the FDA might need to raise its standards.

Multiple experts also raised questions about the risk-benefit ratio of the COVID vaccines for an age group with a statistically insignificant risk of severe illness. (17-Year-Old Died ‘Suddenly in Sleep’ 6 Months After 2nd Pfizer Shot.)

There are untold numbers of people dropping dead suddenly, including many whose relatives have been conditioned not even to think about the possibility their loved one died from the effects of the vaccines, whether immediately or after a period of time, such as what happened to the late Mrs. Jennifer Deason Sprague (mentioned briefly in the report above but has been more thoroughly documented in a separate article):

Jennifer Deason Sprague, a healthy 60-year-old woman from Missouri, died Feb. 21, five months after receiving her second dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.

Jennifer died from Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD), a fatal degenerative brain disorder. 

In an exclusive interview with The Defender, Richard Sprague said his wife received the first dose of Pfizer on Aug. 29, 2021, and her second dose on Sept. 21, 2021. 

Although he remained unvaccinated, Sprague said his wife got the vaccine because she worked for the Perkins Restaurant Corporation, which required employees to get the shot. 

“I told her to just lie about it and if they asked for a vaccination card, then she should ask them to make everyone show proof they had the shot,” Sprague said. “She felt bad lying about it, so she went ahead and got it.”

Four days after the second dose, Jennifer experienced her first episode of a “sudden strange event she couldn’t explain,” while she and her husband were at a dinner theater.

Sprague said:

“We had just finished our meal and were just visiting. All at once, she said, ‘There is something wrong. Please take me home now. I don’t know what it is and I cannot explain it.’ So we missed the theater and went straight home.”

The following week Jennifer called her doctor and asked if the episode she experienced could be related to the COVID vaccine. 

“The doctor said if it was the shot, she would have known it after a couple of hours, not a couple of days,” Sprague said. 

Jennifer started having more episodes and her left hand and side began to tremble. On Oct. 13, 2021, Jennifer went back to the doctor, who prescribed Xanax for anxiety. 

Over the next few weeks, her symptoms worsened and her left side began to feel heavier than her right side, Sprague said. This continued throughout November and December. Jennifer’s doctor instructed her to stay on the Xanax because he thought it was anxiety. 

Jennifer experienced another episode of the “events she couldn’t explain” on Dec. 24, 2021, only this time it was worse, Sprague said. She told everyone she needed to go home and apologized. 

Later that evening, Sprague took his wife to the ER, where physicians treated her for anxiety and recommended pills she could take to “get her through the night.” The doctors could find nothing wrong with her, Sprague said.

The next morning, Jennifer went to work at Perkins, as all employees were required to work on Christmas day. But by 10 a.m., Richard got a call to pick up his wife. 

“She had a very bad episode at work,” Sprague explained. “She couldn’t hold a tray or pour coffee.”
Sprague found a new doctor. At Jennifer’s appointment on Jan. 5, the physician said she was being over-medicated and stopped everything cold turkey, thinking this would resolve her symptoms, Sprague said. 

A follow-up was scheduled for Feb. 10, but Sprague took Jennifer back to the doctor at the end of January because her symptoms were more severe. 

Sprague explained:

“By this time, I’m having to tow her along when we walk. We would go to the mall and walk laps so she was in shape when she would return to work, but around January 23, to look at my wife — if this is Xanax withdrawal I felt I needed someone to encourage me. 

“She was having a hard time dressing herself. It would take her two hours to get focused in the morning, and her brain fog was bad. She would lose her train of thought. After 30 minutes or so I’d walk in the bathroom and ask if she was okay and the shower would be cold again. At the time, we laughed about it.”

“When I took Jennifer back to the doctor, they took one look at her and knew something was going on,” Sprague said. Doctors performed blood work and MRIs, but the results came back normal. 

“They recommended a neurologist — because something didn’t look quite right — and a psychiatrist to see if it was psychological, which scared Jennifer because she said she wasn’t crazy,” Sprague said. “If this was Xanax withdrawal this thing would be turning around any day.”

Sprague said: 

“Early that evening something happened in her head. She did not like the neurologist because he wanted her to see the psychiatrist and she started repeating herself over and over: ‘This guy thinks I’m crazy. This guy thinks I’m crazy.’ She started stumbling around. She stumbled trying to get in the car. I called my son to help me and we took her straight home.”

After they arrived home, two of Sprague’s children — an RN and a chemist — came over. They persuaded Jennifer to go back to the ER.

“Doctors immediately did another MRI and admitted her around January 30,” Sprague said. 

At the time, Jennifer was still able to sit up and walk independently. 

“I didn’t know it at the time, but the neurologist had read the MRI and saw a significant change on the right side of her brain and suspected CJD,” Sprague said. “They didn’t tell me because they wanted to rule out everything else.”  

Doctors did more scans of Jennifer’s brain and entire body to rule out infections and cancer. “They said she was a 60-year-old in a 40-year-old’s body,” Sprague said. 

At the end of the week, Jennifer’s doctors said they needed to perform a spinal tap, but by this time, she was unable to get out of bed by herself.  Sprague said:

“In one week she started regressing so fast it was unbelievable. She was fogged, having a hard time, was seeing snakes on the wall — like she had dementia — and it would only last about three days until that part of the brain was gone. But she never forgot who I was. She always remembered who I was.”

The spinal tap confirmed Jennifer had CJD, a prion disease. A study published last year in Microbiology & Infectious Diseases found a potential link between Pfizer’s COVID vaccine and prion disease in humans. 

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), prion diseases are a family of rare progressive neurodegenerative disorders that affect humans and animals. Prion diseases are usually rapidly progressive and always fatal.

The CDC’s website states:

“The term ‘prions’ refers to abnormal, pathogenic agents that are transmissible and are able to induce abnormal folding of specific normal cellular proteins called prion proteins that are found most abundantly in the brain. The functions of these normal prion proteins are still not completely understood. The abnormal folding of the prion proteins leads to brain damage and the characteristic signs and symptoms of the disease.”

Sprague said the doctors hoped Jennifer had the curable autoimmune disorder known as “Brain on Fire,” which is triggered by an attack on one of the key neurotransmitter receptors in the brain. 

Brain on Fire mimics CJD but can be cured, Sprague said. So, they “immediately started treating Jennifer for it and giving her steroids, but it made absolutely no difference.”  

After Jennifer was diagnosed with CJD on Feb. 12, Jennifer’s insurance company said it would no longer pay for her care and Sprague was told his wife would not recover. 

“If I leave her in the hospital it’s out of pocket,” Sprague said. “Otherwise, it’s a care facility or I take her home on hospice.” 

Sprague said:

“I talked the hospital into allowing her to stay one more day and I suggested they try rehab one more time. But the next day, it was worse. They tried to get her to sit up and to communicate with her, but by then … she could take things in but could not take anything out.”

Sprague made arrangements for hospice care at his home. 

“During her final days, she was pretty much in a total coma,” Sprague said. “Although at times she would still try to talk or kiss me.” 

Sprague said:

“Your brain is just disappearing. It’s crazy. You’re in this perfect healthy body and your brain just dies within the course of a few months.”

Jennifer died at 12:47 p.m. on Feb. 21.

After speaking with The Defender, Sprague said he will be filing a report with the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System — a reporting system for vaccine injuries no one in the medical community told him about.

Sprague said doctors were “totally noncommittal” on whether the Pfizer vaccine caused Jennifer’s CJD, but the nurses became interested in the connection after reading an article in The Defender about Cheryl Cohen, who also experienced rapid-onset sporadic CJD and died within three months of her second Pfizer dose.

Sprague said he wants others to take the risks of COVID vaccines seriously and to understand the consequences of getting the shots.

He added:

“Never take one of these shots without full knowledge of what can happen … without full knowledge that this is experimental. This is not just something to run out and randomly do. You’re a guinea pig. Do you want to be a part of that or not?”

“I would take the consequences of not being able to do something because I’m not vaccinated over the risks of the shots,” Sprague said. “If you look at the risks and still choose to take it that’s one thing, but blindly taking it is totally wrong and unconstitutional.” (Exclusive Interview: Woman Dies of Rare Brain Disorder Six Months After Pfizer Shot.)

Tragic stories such as this abound. Individual human beings with rational, immortal souls made in the image and likeness of the Most Blessed Trinity and redeemed by the shedding of every single drop of the Most Precious Blood of the Second Person of the Most Blessed Trinity made Man, Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, during his Passion and Death and on the wood of the Holy Cross on Good Friday are being subjected to deaths by poisoned potions developed by mad scientists in conjunction with pharmaceutical company executives and government public health apparatchiks, each of whom is as heartless to the deaths their potions cause as they are to the deaths caused by the chemical abortifacients they develop and/or manufacture to kill the innocent preborn and the cocktail of other drugs that they market to kill off living human being put into “palliative care” just as poor Mrs. Jennifer Deason Sprague above.

One author has been the matter as follows:

“The greatest lie ever told is that vaccines are safe and effective.” Dr. Len Horowitz

Be Alarmed and Warned

If one is against COVID vaccines (genetic injections), one should be against the FDA, the NIH, CDC, Dept. of Health and Human Services agencies, NIAID, etc., but also actual doctors in clinical practice, researchers, hospital administrators, and for sure against the pharmaceutical companies and their CEOs that make and sell the most dangerous vaccines in existence. They are all from the same family of rats and not to be trusted as far as you can spit into a hurricane wind.

Be very careful when taking a vaccine for COVID. Your life insurance may not pay if it determines your COVID19 jab is an ‘experimental medical intervention,’ which is how it is being widely characterized. Also, the alarm is going up from a life insurance company, which reports a 40 percent increase in deaths among people in the prime of life. So this could be the shot heard around the world warning us that COVID vaccines could be worse for the human race than a World War.

Vaccines Are Safe

Vaccines are so safe that the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) for vaccine injury and death payout $ 3.1 Billion between 1989 and 2015. Average annual payout 2005-2009: $ 75,630,051 per year. Average annual payout 2010-2014: $221,822,386 per year. In 2021, the U.S. government paid $246.9 million in vaccine-related injuries and deaths claims. Not a single cent was related to Covid-19 vaccines.

If you give a green pass to any of the above organizations, you favor the massacre of millions and are thus complicit. Tens of thousands of doctors and nurses are guilty as charged. The truth is people (and babies) have been getting hurt and dying from vaccines for a long time. I have been writing about this for over 18 years, but the message never got through, and look where we are now.

The COVID vaccines are at the apex of the wrongness in modern medicine and speak about a terrible form of terrorism inherent in the vaccine industrial complex. We should have known better. Virologists and vaccine proponents were warming up for decades for what we have now from Pfizer and friends.

James Howard Kunstler reported that Dr. Robert Malone (inventor of m-RNA technology) truth-bombing the Internet with three hours of straight talk about the U.S. health authorities’ campaign to destroy the lives of at least half a million U.S. citizens (so far). Podcaster Joe Rogan assisted skillfully in an interview that is finally rocking the world out of an epic consensus trance. (Listen.)

Kunstler said, “The American people have been played backward and forwards, inside and out, through and through, and up and down, driven to the very edge of national suicide by a combine of enemies within and without.”  (Treating Disease With Health Not Vaxxines. For an extended interview with Dr. Robert Malone conducted by a man named Art Moore, please see: Scientific Fraud and the CDC - by Robert W Malone MD, MS, which is appended below.)

This scientific fraud is such that the lives of individual victims matter not one whit the monsters have developed a veritable demonic rite of endless vaccinations replete with digital vaccine passports as the price of admission to social life. One by one the victims die, and only a few of their stories of been told. Here are ten of those stories:

10 People Whose Lives Changed After COVID-19 Shots

1. Jim Ashby — learning to walk again

Ashby was forced to get a COVID-19 shot by Dec. 3, 2021, or his employer would consider him “voluntarily resigned.” Eight days after receiving the Pfizer jab, he had a major hemorrhagic stroke.

He’s been in rehab since October 2021, suffering from complete paralysis on the left side of his body. He still has a long way to go in recovery, and still can’t feel or use his left arm or walk without assistance.

His rehab is excruciatingly painful, he says, and he spends up to six hours a day learning how to walk again.

What’s worse, his employer isn’t covering the medical bills for the costs of this stroke. “My life has been totally changed, all because of the vaccine mandate … my old life is dead,” he says, “and I have started my new life as a paraplegic.”

2. Athletes collapsing and dying

Healthy athletes around the world are dying of heart attacks and strokes. The numbers are exploding, with athletes suffering neurological problems, too.

What’s happened in the last six months to a year that’s different? Is there anything in common that’s changed that hooks all these athletes together? They all have had COVID-19 shots. Among them:

  • Abou Ali, a 22-year-old football (soccer) player, suffered from cardiac arrest in Denmark on Sept. 11, 2021.
  • Caddy Alberto Olguin collapsed and died from a heart attack on the golf course on Oct. 9, 2021.
  • 30-year-old Venezuelan marathon champion Alexaida Guedez, 30, died of a heart attack during a 5,000-meter race on Aug. 22, 2021.
  • Andrea Astolfi, 45, sports director of Calcio Orsago in Italy, died of a heart attack on Sept. 11, 2021, after returning from training.
  • Ava Azzopardi, 14, collapsed on a soccer field in the U.S. on Oct. 15, 2021, suffering from cardiac arrest — she had to be put in a medically induced coma to survive.

3. Dr. Neil Singh Dhalla, died from myocarditis

Dr. Neil Singh Dhalla fell asleep four days after he got a COVID-19 booster shot — and died from a heart attack. The autopsy stated myocarditis — inflammation of the heart muscle that’s a recognized adverse effect of mRNA COVID-19 shots. A CEO of a major health clinic, he was only 48 years old and had never had heart problems in his life.

4. Faith Ranson, 16-Year-Old Plagued by Convulsions and Tics

A happy, healthy 16-year-old girl in Australia who got the Pfizer COVID-19 shot is now crippled with convulsions, persistent nausea and visible tics. The problems began three days after her second shot and have been ongoing for months.

Health officials actually admitted “there is no question Faith has had a delayed reaction to the second Pfizer vaccination” and is suffering adverse reactions from the shot. Her story even made it to mainstream news.

5. Nurse with COVID told to go back to work

In this video, a “triple vaxxed” nurse from New York explains how she tested positive for COVID-19, and her employer told her to come back to work even though she hadn’t been in quarantine for five days — against CDC recommendations.

Since she was asymptomatic, she was cleared to go to back to work in a health care setting, but told she still had to quarantine in all other aspects of her life. In short, she can go to work to care for patients while actively positive for COVID-19, but she can’t go to a grocery store or a gas station.

Not to mention, her kids were quarantined for 10 days, but she was expected to go back to work in less than five.

6. Stroke-like symptoms in a healthy woman

Complaints of neurological problems and stroke-like reactions continue to pile up. Immediately after receiving the AstraZeneca COVID-19 shot, this previously healthy woman experienced headaches and dizziness and blacked out “a few times.”

Within days, she started experiencing numbness to the point that she couldn’t stand up. Eight days later, she’s in the hospital with loss of feeling in her left arm, left leg and face. She states that 19 women were brought in to her hospital ward with the same symptoms over the span of one weekend.

7. Two teenage boys die from myocarditis in their sleep

Note: Video may not work on all browsers

Epidemiologists have confirmed that two teenage boys from different U.S. states died in their sleep of myocarditis days after getting the Pfizer shot. Both had received second doses of the shot, and McCullough said that in his view, the shots led to the deaths of the teenagers.

In a study that examined the autopsy findings, it’s reported that the “myocarditis” described in the boys’ deaths is “not typical myocarditis pathology”:

“The myocardial injury seen in these post-vaccine hearts is different from typical myocarditis and has an appearance most closely resembling a catecholamine-mediated stress (toxic) cardiomyopathy. Understanding that these instances are different from typical myocarditis and that cytokine storm has a known feedback loop with catecholamines may help guide screening and therapy.”

8. 59-year-old woman dies hours after shot

A 59-year-old front-line health care worker in the U.K. took the COVID-19 shot and died a few hours later. In the video, her acquaintance states:

“Now I know it’s a given the vaccine’s going to have some casualties — but people are threatened they are going to lose their jobs if they don’t take it … You have the right to take that risk, but you should have the right to refuse it as well — without jeopardizing your job or your freedom of entry or freedom from discrimination.”

9. Vaccine advocate nearly goes blind

Note: Video may not work on all browsers

The man in this video describes himself as a believer in “science” and a “vaccine advocate,” but this didn’t spare him from the shot’s adverse effects. Five days after his first Pfizer COVID-19 shot, he started having blurry vision in his left eye. Within three days, he had lost 60% of his vision in that eye.

After several medical examinations, doctors, optometrists and retina specialists diagnosed him with central serous retinopathy (CSR), in which a small vein ruptured, leading fluid to accumulate under the retina, causing retinal detachment and partial blindness.

Subscribe to The Defender - It’

Other cases of CSR have also been reported following COVID-19 shots, he says, and in a case report published in the American Journal of Ophthalmology it’s stated, “Acute CSR may be temporally associated with mRNA Covid-19 immunization.”

The man’s doctor told him that the risk of getting additional COVID-19 shots outweighs the potential benefit for him and tried to help him get an official exemption from further shots, but it was denied. He states:

“I have been deprived of my human rights as a citizen … I try to gather all my strength so many times during the past few months to just go and receive my second dose in order to follow the laws.

“But the fact that the science says there is an above-average chance that I may lose more of my sight has driven me to anxiety attacks, night terrors and disabling depression … This is a direct violation of my constitutional rights as a citizen and a human being.”

10. Young Woman Suffers From Seizures, Nearly Dies

Beginning her story by stressing she is NOT anti-vaccine or pro-conspiracy theory, this young woman describes what happened to her after she received a Moderna COVID-19 shot, which she decided to get so she and her husband could join some friends on a cruise.

The day after the shot she started feeling “weird,” delirious and “disassociated from herself,” she says. Soon after, she blacked out in the bathroom, and when her husband tried to revive her, she began seizing. She had three seizures between the time her husband called 911 and when the ambulance got her to the hospital.

She was intubated and suffered other severe effects, she says. She spent days in the hospital and is now taking anti-seizure medication, while living with ongoing anxiety about her near-death experience, which she believes was caused by the shot.

“Go out there and do your research so you can make an informed decision,” she says. “Because you don’t want to put something in your body that could potentially harm you.”

Let your voice be heard

If you or a loved one has been injured by a COVID-19 shot, I will help you share your testimony. Vaccine mandates have led to injuries, devastation and deaths — while the brainwashing “get your vaccine now” campaign is being used to divide and conquer.

One spark is all that is required to start a fire. There is a revolution building — a revolution for freedom to live your life without medical mandates or dictators calling the shots.

Please share your story with us, and encourage others you know who have a story to share theirs. It’s never been more important than now, for you and your family, to take control of your health. (Ten Peoples’ Lives Changed Forever by Covid Vaccines.)

Medical researchers discovered the risk of myocarditis in young men increases after each Pfizer injection, especially after the second dose.

Two teenage American boys have died after receiving the Covid “vaccine,” according to an article in the journal Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. The children were found dead in bed three and four days after their second Pfizer injections. The boys were pronounced dead at home and never given a chance to be resuscitated.

One boy complained of headaches and stomach complaints but felt better three days after the injection. The other boy had no complaints. According to autopsies that were performed, they didn’t have corona, but they did have myocarditis. The report suggested a hyper-inflammatory cytokine response could have driven the damage.

According to The Centers for Disease Control (CDC), “Myocarditis is inflammation of the heart muscle, and pericarditis is inflammation of the outer lining of the heart.” 

Greatest Risk for Death

Medical researchers Dr. James R. Gill, Dr. Randy Tashjian, and Dr. Emily Duncanson discovered that the risk of myocarditis in young men increases after each Pfizer injection, especially after the second dose. The risk is most significant in the first week after the second dose.

“Two fatal cases of myocarditis in teenage boys a few days after the second dose,” reports US internist and cardiologist Peter McCullough on his Twitter account. They were “found dead at home, without a chance of resuscitation.”

More Deaths Coming

“I testified in US Senate on January 24 that ‘one case is one too many!’” exclaimed McCullough. “Parents and children should know that more deaths will occur.”

Even the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) safety panel determined a “likely association” between the Pfizer and Moderna shots and cases of myocarditis and pericarditis in vaccine recipients.

Japan labels Covid “vaccines” with warnings of their dangerous and potentially deadly side effects. They are particularly raising concerns about the risks of myocarditis in young men injected with Pfizer or Moderna’s mRNA gene–therapy treatment.

Proimenant Doctors Warned Parents Not to Inject Their Children

Why are healthy young people receiving the “vaccines” when teenagers are virtually immune to Covid? However, myocarditis requiring hospitalization occurs in up to 1 in 2,000 teenage boys and young men at rates following mRNA jabs, a rate far higher than the rate caused by Covid.

RAIR Foundation USA has continuously reported on the risk of myocarditis from the “vaccines,” especially in children. During an interview with RAIR, Dr. Roger Hodkinson warned that saying that the vaccines are “safe” is the “most grotesque form of medical malpractice.” The doctor explained that “In a normal clinical trial, this number of young men coming down with myocarditis, the trial would have been stopped in its tracks. Boom! Finished! Done.”

Virologist Sucharit Bhakdi tried to warn parents in a video statement not to have their children take the potentially “lethal” Covid “vaccines,”

Do not give the shot to children because they are absolutely without any possibility of defending themselves, if you give that jab to your child you are committing a crime.

Dr. Robert Malone, the highly respected inventor of mRNA vaccine technology, also released a powerful statement warning parents about injecting their children with the gene therapies,

Dr. Malone explains that if parents opt to give their children the Covid vaccine, “a viral gene will be injected into your children’s cells.” “This gene forces your child’s body to make toxic spike proteins,” he says, which “often cause permanent damage in children’s critical organs” and can “trigger fundamental changes to their immune system.” Dr. Malone continues to say that damage done would be “irreparable”. Further, he warns that “this novel technology has not been adequately tested.”

Weeks ago, whistleblowers provided information that Covid ‘vaccine’ Injuries in the military, specifically myocarditis diagnoses, were being scrubbed from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED).

How many more lives must be destroyed or lost before governments worldwide stop demanding and pressuring their citizens to receive the controversial injections. The threat to children does not seem to be Covid, but the “vaccines” meant to protect them supposedly. At what point is it considered premeditated murder to give a child an injection that has been shown to potentially kill them?  (Two Young Boys Found Dead in Bed afer Second Pfizer Shot.)

In response to the question posed by the author in the paragraph cited just above, it is very likely that the those in civil governments around the world want to see people die as part of the “great reset’s” program of depopulation. Too many “useless eaters,” you understand, people who, according to an incoming associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States of America, Ketanji Brown Jackson, do not have inherent natural rights:

A set of written questions that Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas (for whom this writer's daughter works) submitted to Jackson during her confirmation hearings asked the following: "Please explain, in your own words, the theory prevalent among members of the Founding Fathers' generation that humans possess natural rights that are inherent or inalienable."

Jackson responded: "The theory that humans possess inherent or inalienable rights is reflected in the Declaration of Independence, which states: 'We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness."

The very next written question asked Jackson: "Do you hold a position on whether individuals possess natural rights, yes or no?"

Jackson responded: "I do not hold a position on whether individuals possess natural rights." (Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson and Alienable Rights.)

It is pretty easy to dispose of people once one believes that human beings do not have any inherent natural rights, no less the binding precepts of the Fifth Commandment prohibit the deliberate, intentional taking of any innocent human life under any circumstances. Justice Jackson, who will be sworn in after the retirement of Associate Justice Stephen Breyer takes effect at the end of the Supreme Court’s term in June, therefore, has no problem supporting the killing of innocent human beings in the womb, a support she shares with the manufacturers of the poisoned potions that are killing off people around the world more by design than by accident.

Indeed, consider the list of mayors in Germany and Austria who have dropped dead unexpected since the introduction of the vaccines:

When did so many young and healthy middle-aged people, described as fit and sporty, drop dead before 2020?

Since December 2020, many sudden and unexpected deaths of mayors under 60 years old have occurred in Germany and Austria. Questions are swirling about whether these elected officials were overwhelmed by job stress, or could there be another reason for so many “fit and healthy” politicians dying?

On December 12, 2020, 41-year-old CSU Mayor Dirk Rosenbauer collapsed during a municipal council meeting and later died in a hospital in Coburg. The headline read, “At only 41 years old  – mayor from Bavaria collapses during council meeting – dead”.

We are all completely shocked and it is incomprehensible. He was fit and healthy, always walked his dog and played handball

Sadly, the headlines have been filled with similar cases for about two years. The names of Mayors being added to the list of unexpected and sudden deaths seems to be growing steadily. 

The “Freie Bremer” channel on Telegram compiled a list of several such incidents, at least 15 known deaths in Germany and Austria in the period mentioned. However, the number of unreported cases could be higher.

December. 12. 2020 41-year-old CSU Mayor Dirk Rosenbauer in Michelau, Germany. He leaves behind a wife and two children.

In September 2020, German Mayor Heinrich Suess died unexpectedly at the age of only 56.

In June 2020, the 50-year-old German Mayor of Lenggries, Markus Landthaler, died unexpectedly.

On September 15, 2021, the 47-year-old German Mayor of Limbach-Oberfrohna Jesko Vogel died. He leaves behind a wife and two daughters. From 1991 to 2014, he was a player and captain of the first handball team at BSV Limbach.

October 18, 2021, 57-year-old Deputy Mayor of Kindberg, Peter Sattler, died suddenly on a hike.

On October 21, 2021, the 60-year-old Mayor Christian Ruh of Bodolz on Lake Constance died unexpectedly.

On Saturday, October 24, 2021, Burscheid’s Mayor Stefan Caplan died unexpectedly. He was only 56 years old.

October 28, 2021, 59-year-old German Mayor Wolfgang Eckl “unexpectedly” died.

November 27, 2021, Mayor Jochim Ruppert died unexpectedly on Friday evening at the age of 59.

December 23, 2021, 54-year-old Schiltberg Mayor Fabian Streit died unexpectedly.

March 5, 2022 Mauerkirchen Mayor Horst Gerner died unexpectedly at the age of 57

On March 26, 2022, Christian Maurer, a 38-year-old mayor in Upper Austria, died. He collapsed on March 21 during a municipal council meeting and died days later in the hospital. Doctors could not repair Maurer’s cerebral hemorrhage. The local politician leaves behind his wife and their six-week-old son.

On March 29, 2022, The incumbent Mayor of Waldshut-Tiengen, Joachim Baumert, died unexpectedly over the weekend at the age of 57. 

On March 31, The third mayor of Coburg, Thomas Nowak, died suddenly and unexpectedly at the age of 53.

On April 1, 2022, the First Mayor of Pfaffenhausen and trained police officer Franz Renftle died at the age of 54.

When will authorities investigate these cases more closely? Of course, not all of these Mayors have necessarily died from the exact cause. However, when did so many young and healthy middle-aged people, described as healthy and sporty, drop dead before 2020? 

Are the numbers of the Mayor’s unexpectedly dying the same as in the past? Perhaps it could be? But shouldn’t the authorities compare previous statistics and share them with the public? Looking the other way or downplaying the number of unexpected deaths of younger and seemingly healthy Mayors only adds to people’s fears. Furthermore, it is creating even more rumors and “conspiracies.” If there is, in fact, a problem, it should be of concern to the government. After all, it’s government officials who are dropping dead in numbers.

RIP to all of the Mayors who have passed. (Epidemic: German and Austrian Mayors Under 60 Are'Suddenly and Unexpectedly' Dropping Dead.)

A whole lot of other vaccinated people are dying these days. Although most of these peoples’ relatives do not see the connection between their loved ones’ sudden deaths and the vaccines, some do. Here is yet another story:

The mother of a 34-year-old man who died suddenly two weeks after his first dose of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine said she believes her son would be alive today if he had had the information he needed to make an informed decision about the vaccine.

Victor Castillo Simoes died May 5, 2021, from an acute aortic dissection — an uncommon medical emergency in which the inner layer of the large blood vessel branching off the heart’s aorta tears. The condition mostly affects men in their 60s and 70s.

In an exclusive interview with The Defender, Simoes’ mother, Henrietta Simoes, said her son’s only symptom was the chest pain he experienced shortly before he died.

Simoes, a senior manager at Amazon, received his first Pfizer shot on April 20, 2021, at a Seattle, Washington Safeway.

Fifteen days later, he woke up feeling unwell and had chest pains, Henrietta said. He called an ambulance and told his girlfriend he “wasn’t right,” and needed to get checked out.

“When his girlfriend arrived, he introduced her to the medics and then collapsed,” Henrietta said. “He was unresponsive from that point on.”

Simoes was intubated in the ambulance and was taken to Harborview Medical Center in Seattle. Thirty minutes later he was declared dead, Henrietta said.

Simoes’ family had an autopsy performed. It showed he experienced an acute aortic dissection. (Exclusive: 34-Year-Old Died After Pfizer Shot, Mother Shares ‘Ridiculous’ Letters From CDC.)

No connection?

Just a coincidence, one of many?

Only the propagandists believe that there is no connection. The supposed “scientists” who “follow the science” only follow their own ideology, which is why, of course, that they cannot admit that most of the continuing outbreaks of the CCP/Wuhan/Red Chinese/China/Covid-19/Coronavirus are being caused by the vaccines themselves:

U.S. counties with the highest rates of vaccination against COVID-19 are currently experiencing more cases than those with the lowest vaccination rates, according to data collected by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

The 500 counties where 62 to 95 percent of the population has been vaccinated detected more than 75 cases per 100,000 residents on average in the past week. Meanwhile, the 500 counties where 11 to 40 percent of the population has been vaccinated averaged about 58 cases per 100,000 residents.

The data is skewed by the fact that the CDC suppresses figures for counties with very low numbers of detected cases (one to nine) for privacy purposes. The Epoch Times calculated the average case rates by assuming the counties with the suppressed numbers had five cases each on average.

The least vaccinated counties tended to be much smaller, averaging less than 20,000 in population. The most vaccinated counties had an average population of over 330,000. More populous counties, however, weren’t more likely to have higher case rates. (Counties With Highest Vaccination Rates See More COVID-19 Cases Than Least Vaccinated.)

Yet it is that most people go about their daily lives without giving any of this any thought at all as they have been conditioned by our civil minders to dismiss all adverse news about the “sacred” vaccines as “disinformation.”

Go tell the father of the late Ernest Ramirez about “disinformation”:

“CDC recommends COVID-19 vaccine boosters down to age 12,” says a recent CBC news headline.

The article opens as follows:

“Millions of Americans between the ages of 12 and 15 can now get a booster shot of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, after the CDC formally adopted new recommendations backed by a majority of the agency’s outside vaccine advisers. The CDC now says that Americans as young as 12 who received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine should receive a third dose as early as five months after their first two shots. The agency’s officials said that enough time has passed for around 5 million adolescents to be eligible.”

“Why in the world are they doing this?” one asks in disbelief.

Three basic facts have been well established by data and studies:

  1. Healthy children are at virtually zero risk of serious Covid.
  2. The vaccines will not prevent children from contracting the virus.
  3. Covid injections carry risk of serious side effects.

According to a cost-benefit analysis conducted by Toby Rogers, Ph.D., in the 5 to 11 age range, 117 healthy kids will have to die of vaccine-related side effects in order to save one child from perishing of Covid 19.

A study from Japan has shown that young people are seven hundred percent more likely to be killed by Pfizer jabs than by Covid.

We have been repeatedly told that we must follow facts and science when dealing with this pandemic.

The science on vaccinating children against Covid-19 is in, and it could not be any clearer: while healthy children are at negligible risk from the disease itself, they are at real risk from the shots.

Since the vaccines do not stop infection and transmission, they will protect neither children nor their communities from the spread of the virus.

It makes not scientific or medical sense to give them these shots. Vaccinating children for SARS-CoV-2 violates both the tenets of good medicine and evidence-based science.

According to Dr Robert Malone, who is one of the world’s preeminent vaccine scientists, the cost benefit analysis is not even close.

Those who want to vaccinate children follow neither the science nor logic. Subjecting children to Covid jabs needlessly exposes young lives to potentially grave risks.

The incidence of myocarditis and pericarditis may be as high as 1 in 317 in the young, especially boys, and increases further with each additional dose.

Then there is a danger of deadly blood clots as well as several other serious conditions such as Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Astonishingly, scores of children have already been injected with two doses that turned out to be ineffective, which is the reason a booster is now required.

The booster, however, already looks to be even more useless than the original offering. The booster, in fact, appears to have negative efficacy which means that those who receive it seem to be more likely to contract the virus.

Soon we will have a multitude of 12-year-olds who will have received three of these pointless and dangerous shots without any medical justification whatsoever.

Robert Kennedy, Jr. said that injecting children with the Covid vaccines is a crime. He is not incorrect.

A number of children have already been killed by the vaccines.

 

Some of the newly vaccinated children will develop serious conditions and some of them will die. The lives of these healthy children will be cut short for no good reason and their parents will be beside themselves with grief.

The deaths of these children will be completely senseless and unnecessary. They could have been easily prevented by simply not giving them the shots that they do not need.

The vaccinators know this: NIH chief Anthony Fauci knows this. The CDC Director Rochelle Walensky knows this. The vaccine makers know this and so does every other scientist and medical professional. Those who are on the take actively push for this travesty while most of the rest are afraid to speak out for fear of losing their jobs.

Those who push for child vaccination are obviously not motivated by public health. Their actions reveal their heartlessness: they are willing to sacrifice healthy children to further their own interests.

Humans can be very cruel, especially when money and power come into play.

People who allow children to die for selfish gain have no moral conscience; they are apparently willing to do anything to accomplish their insidious objectives.

Our society must wake up and stop this godless wrongdoing. (www.lewrockwell.com/2022/01/vasko-kohlmayer/sacrificing-children-to-covi...">https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/01/vasko-kohlmayer/sacrificing-children...">Sacrificing Children to Covid Vaxxines.)

Anyone who does not understand how cruel human beings can be by accepting the chemical and/or surgical execution of innocent babies in their mothers’ wombs will never be persuaded to have concern for those who are being killed by the vaccines, including such sad cases as those of Ernest Ramirez.

Not only do such stories fail to move so-called “public health” apparatchiks who are wedded to the evils of contraception, abortion, sodomy, “brain death”/human organ vivisection, the starvation and dehydration of brain-damaged human beings, “palliative care”/hospice and any number of other means to depopulate the earth but these same monsters “double down” incidences of the CCP/Wuhan/Red China/Chinese/Covid-19/Coronavirus actually increase despite all their “mitigation” efforts (lockdowns, social distancing, mask mandates). Australia and Israel are two such countries:

It’s hard to find a country that takes COVID more seriously than Australia. Their strict protocols are producing “extraordinary” results (spoiler alert: I’m being sarcastic).

They are super strict about COVID with measures that include:

  1. www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/global-hr/pages/coronavirus-wes...">https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/global-hr/pages/coronav...">mandatory vaccinations,
  2. https://coronavirus.nt.gov.au/stay-safe/slow-spread/information-about-fa...">mandatory mask use
  3. https://coronavirus.nt.gov.au/stay-safe/slow-spread/information-about-fa...">requiring the unvaccinated to isolate at home,
  4. www.nsw.gov.au/covid-19/business/nsw-rules/square-metres-rules">https://www.nsw.gov.au/covid-19/business/nsw-rules/square-metres-rules" title="Square metres rules">Density limits at indoor areas of hospitality venues and nightclubs,
  5. www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/covid-19-vaccines/getting-you...">https://www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/covid-19-vaccines/get...">free booster doses are available to everyone 18 years and over who have had their second dose of a primary dose course of COVID-19 vaccination at least 4 months ago.
  6. www.nsw.gov.au/covid-19/business/check-in/mandatory-qr-code">https://www.nsw.gov.au/covid-19/business/check-in/mandatory-qr-code">mandatory electronic check-ins

Note that these measures vary by what state you are in.

The state-specific medical countermeasures makes total sense as having the virus in NSW is completely different than having the virus in Northern Territory (I’m being sarcastic again…).

 

Almost everyone is vaccinated. Check out the box on the right for the vax rate in the ACT:

Pfizer advice to the Australian people…

“Keep it up! Do not ask any questions. Do not question the outcomes. Your government knows best.”

How the Australian government spins the results

“See it works! Those numbers would be so much worse if you hadn’t followed our advice!”

They are gaslighting you.

How the people feel about all this

The Governments asked for two weeks to 'flatten the curve' 90 weeks ago.

Melbourne, Victoria then picked up the dubious honor of becoming the most locked down city on the globe. At times the anti-terrorist squad was out on the streets firing rubber bullets and tear gas at people standing on street corners simply saying they had been locked up long enough - the audacity of these people! Tens of thousands of family businesses have been destroyed, family homes lost, and our populations mental health devastated along with our happy go lucky culture. Highly effective early treatment drugs were banned Hydroxychloroquine in April 2020, then Ivermectin in October 2021. With the stated reason that they would discourage Australians from getting the vaccination.

Forced vaccinations are the norm, with few exemptions being granted - even to those who suffered terribly from their first jab!

The Government set their targets: 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%. They were reached just as the target was increased yet again.

90 weeks on and the 'curve' has gone through the roof. All this damage, all for nothing. The salt in the wound is this was all so obviously foreseeable, yet all these fools in government, along with all their medical experts are in shock. And, guess what, more of the same BS is on its way.

Summary

If you are looking to help the virus infect people, few countries on Earth do it better than Australia. They have gone from virtually no COVID cases to a meltdown of cases.

I think it is only a matter of time before the world adopts all of the Australian counter-measures. (https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/australia-shows-the-world-the-wrong">Australia shows the world the wrong way to keep the virus under control.)

Israel could see up to nearly 40 percent of the population infected by coronavirus during the current wave, Prime Minister Naftali Bennett said Sunday, as testing facilities nationwide buckled.

"Data presented at the cabinet meeting indicates that here, in Israel, between two to four million citizens in total will be infected during this current wave," Bennett wrote on his Twitter account.

A country of just 9.4 million, www.france24.com/en/tag/israel/">https://www.france24.com/en/tag/israel/" target="_self">Israel has seen infections nearly quadruple over the past week compared to the previous one. The health ministry reported 17,518 new infections on Saturday. 

A lack of testing sites created huge pressure on the existent ones, causing the government to revise its testing policy and as of Friday designate the PCR tests, the most accurate, only for people at risk and over 60.

Anyone else is to take an antigen test, whether at home or applied by a medic.

But even the new guidelines proved impossible to follow. Antigen tests are in scarce supply at pharmacies around the country, and people spend hours in line waiting to get one administered.

Bennett reiterated he would do everything possible to avoid a lockdown, which he said has not proven an efficient measure against the spread of the highly-infectious www.france24.com/en/tag/coronavirus/">https://www.france24.com/en/tag/coronavirus/" target="_self">Omicron variant, and could deal a heavy blow to the economy.

"Our goal remains the same goal – to keep the economy functioning as much as possible, and safeguard the most vulnerable," he said.

Also Sunday, Israel began allowing vaccinated visitors into the country, six weeks after shutting its borders entirely in a bid to prepare for the inevitable fifth wave of Covid cases by www.france24.com/en/tag/vaccine/">https://www.france24.com/en/tag/vaccine/" target="_self">vaccinating and obtaining medication.

Reopening borders part of shift in Israel’s Covid-19 strategy

Health ministry data showed that more than 4.3 million Israelis were fully vaccinated with three shots, while 204 people are hospitalised in serious condition as a result of Covid-19 illness on Sunday.

More than 1.5 million Covid cases, including 8,269 deaths, have been officially recorded in Israel. (www.france24.com/en/middle-east/20220110-40-of-israel-could-be-infected-...">https://www.france24.com/en/middle-east/20220110-40-of-israel-could-be-i...">40% of Israel could be infected with Covid-19 in current wave, says PM.)

There are none so blind as those who refuse to see, and our civil minders, being blind to the truths of Divine Revelation as they have been entrusted by Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ exclusively to His Catholic Church for their infallible explication and eternal safekeeping, are being willfully blind to the harm caused by the vaccines and by their own “mitigation” efforts because that have bladders puffed up with pride and desire to increase, not decrease, their draconian control over ordinary human beings.

Studies, such as one summarized in the report below, showing the harmful effects of the vaccines and their absolute ineffectiveness to provide protection about the CCP/Wuhan/Red Chinese/China/Covid-19/Coronavirus:

Instead of bringing an end to this pandemic as promised, the widespread rollout of the experimental vaccines has actually https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/new-big-data-study-of-145-countries" target="_blank">caused a sharp increase in Covid-19 cases and deaths across the world, according to a www.researchgate.net/publication/356248984_Worldwide_Bayesian_Causal_Imp...">https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356248984_Worldwide_Bayesian_Ca..." target="_blank">recently published preprint study that looked at data from the 145 of the most vaccinated countries in the world.

The 99-page study titled www.researchgate.net/profile/Kyle-Beattie/publication/356248984_Worldwid...">https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kyle-Beattie/publication/356248984_..." target="_blank">“Worldwide Bayesian Causal Impact Analysis of Vaccine Administration on Deaths and Cases Associated with COVID-19: A BigData Analysis of 145 Countries” found that in the US specifically, the jab has caused a whopping 38% more Covid cases per million – and an even more astonishing 31% increase in deaths per million.

Results indicate that the treatment (vaccine administration) has a strong and statistically significant propensity to causally increase the values in either y1 [variable chosen for deaths per million] or y2 [variable chosen for cases per million] over and above what would have been expected with no treatment.

y1 showed an increase/decrease ratio of (+115/-13), which means 89.84% of statistically significant countries showed an increase in total deaths per million associated with COVID-19 due directly to the causal impact of treatment initiation [vaccines].

y2 showed an increase/decrease ratio of (+105/-16) which means 86.78% of statistically significant countries showed an increase in total cases per millionof COVID-19 due directly to the causal impact of treatment initiation.”

Researchers performed a causal analysis comparing both pre- and post-treatment periods to come up with the difference in cases and deaths since the implementation of the vaccine by analyzing publicly available COVID-19 data to determine the effect of their widespread rollout. After eliminating all results from countries with low vaccination rates or incomplete data, there were 128 countries with sufficient data on deaths (y1) and 103 countries to examine total cases (y2), which comprised a total of 145 unique countries.

“Countries with few COVID-19 deaths in the year 2020 appear to have fared the worst of all countries after vaccine administration (e.g Thailand, Vietnam, Mongolia, Taiwan, Seychelles, Cambodia, etc.).

The causal impact results from vaccine administration seen in these countries [is] hundreds or thousands of percentage increases in total deaths and cases per million.

we can be most statistically confident in due to the direct increase of COVID-19 associated deaths and cases after vaccine administration, where prior to vaccine administration there were few or none.”

In the study’s conclusion, researchers warned that the substantial increase in deaths and cases should be “highly worrisome” for the policymakers around the world who have been promoting the experimental vaccines as the “key to gain back our freedoms.” (www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/01/massive-145-country-study-shows-sharp-i...">https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/01/massive-145-country-study-shows...">Massive 145-Country Study Shows Sharp INCREASE of Transmission and DEATH After Introduction of COVID Vaccines.)

Who cares about facts such as these?

Not anyone in the federal government in the United States of America who is prominent enough to speak on these issues.

Not anyone in the mainslime media.

Not anyone at the United Nations, World Health Organization, World Economic Forum, or the European Union.

As has been reported on this site so many times in this series, which I thought I had ended with part twelve (!), not even the examples of breakthrough cases of the Red China/Wuhan/Chinese/Covid-19 Coronavirus in “fully vaccinated” individuals who hold positions of public prominence can dent the protective armor that they wear against being infected with the truth:

South Carolina U.S. House Rep. Nancy Mace will work from home in Charleston after she reported a breakthrough COVID-19 case, marking the second time the Lowcountry congresswoman has tested positive for coronavirus. The Daniel Island Republican said she tested for coronavirus after one of her children tested positive. Mace, who has been fully vaccinated since last spring, has now tested positive for COVID-19 twice, after the first time on June 23, 2020.

“I’m feeling OK. This is more mild than the first time. I’m completing quarantine and working from home as I recover,” Mace said in an official statement. “We are all frustrated with our common enemy COVID-19. I am praying everyone can stay healthy and we can all get past this soon.” Mace is at least the second House member from South Carolina to report a breakthrough case, and she is among a growing list of members of Congress who have tested positive for COVID-19 and who are vaccinated.

House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn reported his breakthrough case in December. The Columbia Democrat also was fully vaccinated and received his booster shot in September. Positive coronavirus cases have surged in recent weeks after the emergence of the highly transmissible omicron variant. (www.thestate.com/news/politics-government/article257197652.html">https://www.thestate.com/news/politics-government/article257197652.html">SC’s US Rep. Nancy Mace reports breakthrough COVID 19 case.)

Triple vaccinated Swiss marathon record holder and Olympic athlete Fabienne Schlumpf was diagnosed with myocarditis and may never be able to compete again.

The 31-year-old Swiss runner announced on her Instagram account Thursday that she developed myocarditis. At the time being, she is not allowed to play any sports and participate in training.

“BAD NEWS! Unfortunately a myocarditis is holding me back right now. It’s definitely not an easy time for me but I’m not giving up. I hope to be back soon, chasing my dreams… and competitors.”

A local newspaper confirmed that Schlumpf has been vaccinated and boosted and has never been infected with Covid before.

Translation: Most often, a viral infection leads to myocarditis, Schlumpf does not see a connection with Corona. She has been vaccinated and boostered and has not been infected so far. Actually, she wanted to travel to the training camp in Portugal at the beginning of the year, but nothing came of it. “Nobody can say how long I will have to take a break,” she said.

“The 31-year-old was reported to be feeling ‘fatigued‘ in everyday life and after her heart rate skyrocketed during an easy endurance run last month, she sought out a doctor who diagnosed her with myocarditis,” according to https://thecovidworld.com/fabienne-schlumpf-triple-vaccinated-olympic-at..." target="_blank">the COVID world. (www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/01/triple-vaccinated-swiss-olympic-athlete...">https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/01/triple-vaccinated-swiss-olympic...">Triple Vaccinated Swiss Olympic Athlete Fabienne Schlumpf Diagnosed with Myocarditis - May Never be Able to Compete Again.)

Joe Biden’s fully vaxxed *and boosted* Surgeon General Vivek Murthy on Friday announced he tested positive for Covid.

Murthy’s wife and two young children – Three of which are VAXXED AND BOOSTED – also tested positive for Covid and are experiencing symptoms.

Recall, Vivek Murthy said vaccinated Americans need to wear masks to protect the unvaccinated.

Perhaps Murthy should have worn a mask at home and in the shower to have better protected his family?

Murthy says he is experiencing muscle aches, chills and sore throat.

After lecturing Americans on Covid safety measures, it appears nothing Murthy said actually works because his entire family got the virus anyway.

“And let’s not assume those who get sick are careless. We don’t know people’s circumstances. They may not be able to protect themselves the way we can,” Murthy said.

Last month Dr. Vivek Murthy called for Joe Rogan’s podcast to be censored in order to end the pandemic.

Murthy complained that social media companies are not doing enough to ‘stop the spread’ of Covid misinformation before calling on Spotify to silence Joe Rogan.

“A critical part of how we get through this pandemic” is “limiting the spread of misinformation” from shows like Joe Rogan, Murthy said on Tuesday. (www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/02/bidens-fully-vaxxed-boosted-surgeon-gen...">https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/02/bidens-fully-vaxxed-boosted-sur..." target="_blank">Biden’s Fully Vaccinated Surgeon General and Entire Family Test Postive for the Virus.)

Neither Vivek Murthy nor Anthony Fauci would ever admit it, but many of the "vaccinated" are contracting cases of the CCP/Wuhan/Red Chinese/China/Covid-19/Coronavirus because of the spike proteins contained in the poisoned potions that they have jabbed into their bodies and fully twenty percent of those who are dying or have been injured from those poisoned potions (vaccines) are dying from myocarditis or other cardiac related problems (see https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/cardiac-disorders-injuries-r..." style="font-size: 15px;">Cardiac Disorders Account for 20% of 1.2 Million Injuries Reported After COVID Vaccines, VAERS Data Show).

All the propaganda about the “protection” provided by the gene therapy treatments (“vaccines”) continues to be disproved. The truth of what is happening cannot even penetrate the proud skull of former President Donald John Trump, who continues to pat himself on the back in public for the “success” he realized in starting “Operation Warp Speed.” The only truth in that title is that the whole enterprise was and continues to be warped as it originated in the bowels of hell and has brought untold heartache into hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of families worldwide.

Mind you, there are people who do not what is going on and have given up their jobs to avoid any contact with the poisoned potions. Among them are the world’s airline pilots:

Listen to my interview with airline pilot Latane Campbell to get insight into the current thinking of airline pilots. They now know masks don't work and the vaccines are dangerous.

I interviewed https://rumble.com/vsa2ky-airline-pilot-latane-campbell-interview-a-pilo...">Latane Campbell who is a pilot for a major US airline. Watch it on Rumble:

Key points:

  1. He knows about 100 pilots and 80% are not going to take the booster. They’ll quit if they are forced to take it.
  2. Virtually all of the pilots know that masks are completely useless.
  3. The pilots all take off their masks as soon as they close the cockpit door. Wearing masks makes flying dangerous.
  4. If 20% of the pilots walk off the job, it’s the end of the commercial airline industry.
  5. The airlines tried to strong arm the pilots into taking the vaccines or else. The pilots resisted and the airlines immediately recanted allowing religious and medical exemptions.
  6. The more you vaccinate, the sicker people get. Most pilots have figured this out.

Also, in talking to other commercial airline pilots I learned that it takes two pilots to comfortably fly the plane. If one of them dies from a cardiac arrest, there is only one pilot left to handle everything. That puts that pilot in a very stressful situation and passenger safety is at risk. The plane is designed to be flown by two pilots.

Note:

  1. American Airlines www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLM3ykwmmig">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLM3ykwmmig">just dropped their vaccination requirements.
  2. Don’t be fooled. An unvaccinated pilot is far safer to fly with than a vaccinated pilot. And if you fly privately in a one pilot plane, if you fly with a vaccinated pilot, you are risking your life. Make sure it has a parachute. (https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/80-of-airline-pilots-arent-going">"80% of airline pilots aren't going to take the booster".)

Although our civil minders have back down a little bit in recent months, one can be assured that, as noted at the beginning of this commentary, they stand ready to ramp up the propaganda and the “mitigation” efforts, including intensified repression of what of they call “disinformation” in their Orwellian vocabulary to condition people into accepting their dystopic plans of creating that “brave new world” about which Aldous Huxley had written, as the Congressional midterm elections approach and thereafter. All in the name of “public health,” you understand.

A writer name Steve Kirsch has composed twenty questions that he would like the promoters of the antiseptic world of dystopia to answer concerning their use of Orwellian language to disguise lies as truth and to attack truth as lies:

An open letter to the White House, Surgeon General Murthy, Twitter censors, Medium censors, LinkedIn censors, YouTube censors, the medical community, the mainstream media, all members of US Congress, world leaders, all public health officials anywhere in the world, all “fact checker” organizations, and members of the California legislature especially Assemblymember Evan Low and Senator Dr. Richard Pan.

Dear folks,

I know you want to stop COVID misinformation. I agree. It’s a problem.

In my view, you are the ones spreading it, not me.

Unfortunately, not everyone sees it the same way. www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/jan/27/anti-vaxxers-making-at-least-...">https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/jan/27/anti-vaxxers-making-a..." target="_blank">According to CCDH, who is arguably a world authority on misinformation spreaders (they created the original Disinformation Dozen list relied on by the White House), I’m one of the worst offenders: I’m #3 on their list.

The problem I have is simple: the data clearly shows that it is the CDC and other government agencies that are spreading misinformation, not me.

In order to resolve the conflict, I’m going to make the following offer in good faith: I will happily stop spreading “misinformation” if you all would just take a few minutes to answer a few questions for me. Fair enough? Will you do that?

If not, please tell me why not since this is your only chance of convincing people like me to get the jab.

I know this is important to you because you have a list of misinformation spreaders you want to silence. Just answer all these questions and you’ll silence us (the right way).

Here are my questions:

  1. Why no debates? Why won’t any mainstream doctors or scientists or public health officials (or any other health authority for that matter) debate me or https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/my-team-of-vaccine-safety-experts?s=w" target="_blank">any of my colleagues in a live, recorded debate? I even offer some people (members of the ACIP and VRBPAC committees) $1 million just to come to the debate table and it made no difference. We can’t even get any of them to propose any ground rules that they will accept! For example, https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/johns-hopkins-professor-marty-makary?s=w" target="_blank">Professor Makary proposed debate terms (which weren’t a debate) and then ignored me when I tried to accept them.

  2. VAERS safety signals flashing red since January 2021. How could the CDC and the FDA possibly miss all the https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/the-cdc-knew-in-january-2021-that?s=w" target="_blank">safety signals in VAERS which have been flashing red since January 2021 for thousands of symptoms, some elevated by 1,000X or more? Why did they ignore all attempts to bring this to their attention (if it wasn’t already obvious). They clearly must have known in January that the data coming in didn’t match the claims in the clinical trials.

  3. Risk benefit calculation. I have more than 10 methods that show that www.skirsch.com/covid/Deaths.pdf">https://www.skirsch.com/covid/Deaths.pdf" target="_blank">over 150K people have been killed by the vaccine and the www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2110345">https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2110345" target="_blank">Pfizer trial showed we’d save 1 life from COVID for every 22,000 vaccinated. So after vaccinating 220M people, we kill 150,000 people or more and we save 10,000 lives. If this is wrong, where is the mistake and what are the correct numbers?

  4. Why no investigation into Maddie de Garay? Why did the FDA not investigate the Maddie de Garay case after agreeing to look into it? Why is the press silent on this as well? She was 12 years old in the Pfizer clinical trial and became paralyzed less than 24 hours after injection. Why were her symptoms reported as mild abdominal pain and not paralysis? What is causing her to now progress to being a quadriplegic? And if her symptoms weren’t caused by the vaccine (as claimed by the “fact checkers,” then why are her symptoms virtually identical to other vaccine victims and not explainable any other way?

  5. More people died who took the drug than those who didn’t take the drug. The www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2110345">https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2110345" target="_blank">Pfizer 6 month study showed that more people died who got the drug than who got the placebo (they conveniently forgot to mention this in the abstract or conclusion). Isn’t it supposed to be the other way around? Where is the RCT showing an all-cause death benefit? See https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/more-people-died-in-the-key-clinical" target="_blank">this article for updated numbers in the pre-unblinding phase showing 21 dead who took the drug vs. 17 dead who took the placebo. And how was Pfizer certain that none of the people who got the drug was killed by the vaccine? What tests were done during the autopsies that exonerated the drug? These tests were never revealed and they are still being kept hidden for some odd reason. Since the vaccine wasn’t the cause, why not make the autopsy reports and tests done public that prove this?

  6. Elevated myocarditis rates. How is a 559-fold increase in the reporting rate of myocarditis in VAERS (see https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Ghq_PzxJkMJVoCRLnkmVFWLqhRKFALKV..." target="_blank">slide 19) considered to be a “slightly elevated risk” of myocarditis? Why wasn’t this noticed in January 2021? How did the CDC completely miss this signal (they admitted it was the DoD who spotted it). How do you explain 4 cases of myocarditis at the https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/there-are-now-4-myocarditis-cases?s=w" target="_blank">Monte Vista Christian School (with only 800 students, half of them male and perhaps half of those not vaccinated)? That’s a 1 in 50 rate. Is that just bad luck? And how is it possible that multiple military doctors I’ve asked about the rates in the military both give me numbers over 1%? Am I just unlucky?

  7. How do you explain Schirmacher’s study? Dr. Peter Schirmacher, one of the world’s top pathologists, reported that in 40 cases examined 2 weeks after vaccination, the vaccine killed 30% to 40% of them. Immediately after he reported this, his family was threatened if he spoke out. So Dr. Schirmacher has been silenced. See https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/a-simple-way-to-end-vaccine-misinform..." target="_blank">my article for details. Do you support intimidation techniques to silence legitimate scientists with dissenting views? The Federal Association of German Pathologists has called for autopsies, but the government has silenced them as well. https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/a-simple-way-to-end-vaccine-misinform..." target="_blank">Do you support my call for autopsies? If not, why not? Also, Schirmacher’s results have been validated by https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/bhakdiburkhardt-pathology-results?s=w" target="_blank">Bhakti and Burkhardt. Did all of them get it wrong? How were they fooled?

  8. What is causing the telltale clots? Embalmers have seen https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/exclusive-embalmer-reveals-93-of?s=w" target="_blank">odd blood clots, never before seen before the vaccines rolled out, in up to 93% of cases. These are not normal clots and have never been seen before the vaccines rolled out. What are they caused by and why are they killing so many people?

  9. Excess deaths. What’s causing the excess deaths observed by insurance companies? Insurance company deaths rose in Q3 and Q4 of 2021 at the same time the boosters rolled out. The www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/feb/11/blog-posting/no-covid-19-vacci...">https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/feb/11/blog-posting/no-covid-..." target="_blank">fact checkers say it is due to COVID, but the data doesn’t line up which they fail to point out. Delta started in June and was 93% by August. You’d never know that from https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/ed-dowd-millennial-age-group-25-to?s=w" target="_blank">the graph:

  1. The more you vaccinate, the worse the outcomes. Why do https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/incriminating-evidence?s=w" target="_blank">over 10 studies (including one covering 145 countries) all show that the more we vaccinate, the worse the infection and fatality rates?

  2. Negative efficacy. The https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploa..." target="_blank">latest UK government report shows that for most age groups, you are now more than 3 times more likely to get COVID if you are triple vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. It seems the more you vaccinate, the worse the disparity. It’s clearly tied to the number of vaccinations. How do you explain this if the vaccines are protective?

 

  1. CDC paper admits to negative vaccine efficacy. This is big. Finally, a paper by nine CDC authors published in JAMA in January 2022 (https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2788485" target="_blank">Association Between 3 Doses of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine and Symptomatic Infection Caused by the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron and Delta Variants) shows in Fig. 3 that the vaccines create negative efficacy for Omicron at month 7, just like the https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/reuters-fact-check-of-the-denmark?utm..." target="_blank">Denmark study showed too (in Denmark it was after 3 months). In other words, the CDC authors admit that the vaccines make you more likely to get Omicron starting in month 7. Isn’t this contrary to what the CDC has been telling us? The vaccines aren’t supposed to make things worse, right?

  2. VAERS underreporting factor. What is the URF for VAERS this year? Why didn’t anyone calculate it? Why didn’t the FDA simply admit they don’t know what it is when asked by a reporter? Why does John Su never talk about the proper URF when he talks about the VAERS data?

  3. How can you do risk benefit calculation without estimating the VAERS URF? This is elementary, yet none of the outside committee members of the CDC or FDA ever asks about this. Why not? I keep bringing this up in my public testimony, but they just ignore me.

  4. Pfizer Phase 3 trial exclusions. How do you explain the gaming in the Pfizer trial on exclusions (311 vs. 60)? (see https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1m10LArf525tCPP2tz4-3OIDjEF99W8YK..." target="_blank">Slide 65). That couldn’t have happened by chance. And while you have that slide deck open, if you can answer any other questions in that deck, that would be super helpful.

  5. Every randomized trial shows masks make no difference at all. If masks work, then how come the https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/masks-dont-work?s=w" target="_blank">graph for purple cloth masks in the Bangladesh study showed absolutely no effect and www.poverty-action.org/publication/impact-community-masking-covid-19-clu...">https://www.poverty-action.org/publication/impact-community-masking-covi..." target="_blank">why did they omit this graph from the published paper? I read through all 111 pages and couldn’t find the graph. Not only did they omit the graph, but nowhere in the paper did they point out that the purple cloth masks had no effect. Isn’t that scientific fraud? Also, if masks work, then https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/foia-request-reveals-the-mask-policy?s=w" target="_blank">why isn’t there any data supporting the mask policy in Israel?

  6. Why don’t we have any autopsies done by a competent authority? Why don’t we just do autopsies of 100 people who died within 2 weeks of vaccination? We can have people like Peter Schirmacher, Ryan Cole, Sucharit Bhakdi, and Arne Burkhardt observe this work. That would settle the argument and end the vaccine hesitancy for sure.

  7. Why is there a 5% rate of neurological damage after vaccination? If the vaccines are perfectly safe, then how do you explain how a California neurologist can have 1,000 vaccine injured in their practice of 20,000 patients. That’s a 5% neurological injury rate. This closely matches the vaccine injury rate discovered by the https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/how-rare-are-vaccine-side-effects?s=w" target="_blank">Israeli Ministry of Health (which was 4.5%).

  8. How do you explain https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/incriminating-evidence?s=w" target="_blank">this data?

  9. Can you answer any of the https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/100-questions-they-dont-want-to-answe..." target="_blank">questions on this list?

I look forward to hearing from you. I’d love to get back to technology.

Bonus questions:

  1. Brook Jackson. www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaLxhFiOBYk">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaLxhFiOBYk" target="_blank">Watch the video. Explain to me why there isn’t an independent investigation into the allegations in this video. And how is it possible that the day after Brook went to the FDA that she was fired from her position?

  2. UVGI technology. Why wasn’t UVGI technology (ultraviolet light) recommended by the CDC when the outbreak happened? Why aren’t they saying anything about it now? It’s quite effective everywhere it has been deployed as far as I’m aware. Industrial hygienists have been using this technology for their clients since early 2020. Here’s a note I received:

I know the CDC had a page early on that had controls listed in the various control categories but I haven't seen anything this specific about prioritizing engineering controls like this, especially with the UVGI technology. We started rolling that tech option out to our clients in 2020. Nobody in government was touting UVGI tech at all. We've had that in our office since 2020 and have seen first hand how successful that option is. Our UVGI equipment is set to sanitize the air and surfaces every 6 minutes. Though we had infected people in our office at times, there was never an outbreak. Clients that implemented this system had similar success. This would've been a game changer for schools, instead of them shutting down and putting PPE on kids. It’s been difficult to watch this buffoonery from public health officials who are clearly out of their lane of expertise. (https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/20-questions-they-dont-want-to-answer...">Twenty Questions They  Don’t Want to Answer.)

Don’t hold your breaths waiting for an answer to these very fine questions. Those of us in the peasant class are expected to give our uncritical assent to the “experts.” Those who dissent are to be castigated, persecuted and thrown into the outer darkness as disseminators of “disinformation.”

We live in a world where truth on the natural level has been replaced by sophistic sloganeering of the sort that was described as follows ninety years ago by the philosopher Simone Weil:

"It is as though we had returned to the age of Protagoras and the Sophists, the age when the art of persuasion--whose modern equivalent is advertising slogans, publicity, propaganda meetings, the press, the cinema, and radio--took the place of thought and controlled the fate of cities and accomplished coups d'etat. So the ninth book of Plato's Republic looks like a description of contemporary events." (Simone Weil, quoted in Russell Kirk, The Roots of American Order.)

This even truer today than it was ninety years ago.

Alas, the work of the neo-Sophists of the Renaissance could not have been as triumphant as it has been had it not been for Martin Luther’s revolution against the Divine Plan that God Himself instituted to effect man’s return to Him through the Catholic Church that was aided and abetted by Talmudists to make possible the reign of “man” that is nothing other than the reign of the adversary himself.  

Pope Leo XIII explained that it was indeed the theological relativism of the Protestant Revolution in the Sixteenth Century that made possible the triumph of philosophical, political and moral relativism in the centuries thereafter:

But that harmful and deplorable passion for innovation which was aroused in the sixteenth century threw first of all into confusion the Christian religion, and next, by natural sequence, invaded the precincts of philosophy, whence it spread amongst all classes of society. From this source, as from a fountain-head, burst forth all those later tenets of unbridled license which, in the midst of the terrible upheavals of the last century, were wildly conceived and boldly proclaimed as the principles and foundation of that new conception of law which was not merely previously unknown, but was at variance on many points with not only the Christian, but even the natural law. (Pope Leo XIII, Immortale Dei, November 1, 1885.)

 

The conciliar attack on the nature of dogmatic truth, which leads to the undermining of a belief in all natural truths, is one of the central themes that I have addressed in the past eleven years, two months since coming to accept the true state of the Church Militant in this time of apostasy and betrayal concerns. This attack on the nature of dogmatic truth is nothing other than an attack upon then nature of God Himself, Who is without any shadow of change or alteration.

IV. Jorge Mario Bergoglio: Antichrist’s “Papal” Enabler of the Global Reset

Readers of this website know full well that Jorge Mario Bergoglio, whom most people alive today believe is “Pope Francis,” has been allied with the forces of globalist evil throughout his career as a lay Jesuit revolutionary, and he has used his reign in the conciliar seat of apostasy to advance every globalist shibboleth imaginable in the name of “sustainable development goals” and “saving our common home.” Saving souls, which is the first law of the Catholic Church, after all, is not one his priorities as he believes in the heresy of “universal salvation” for almost everyone save for those who are not onboard the globalist team.

Jorge Mario Bergoglio has been in the vanguard of promoting vaccines to “protect” against the CCP/Wuhan/Red Chinese/China/Covid-19/Coronavirus and in supporting the most draconian “mitigation” measures enacted and fascistically enforced by his statist, globalist comrades worldwide. No exceptions are made for individual conscience, no consideration at all is given to the demonstrable harm being caused by the vaccines/gene therapy treatments, and the conciliar Vatican’s “ethicists” long ago swept any qualms about the use of those human embryonic kidney cell lines that were derived from butchered babies because of the “remoteness” from the time that the babies were killed and the vaccines developed (for my commentary on this in general times, please see www.christorchaos.com/?q=content/antipapal-appointees-always-advance-ant...">http://www.christorchaos.com/?q=content/antipapal-appointees-always-adva...">Antipapal Appointees Always Advance Antichrist’s Anti-Catholic Agenda              from 2019). Bergoglio has even demanded the resignation of a “bishop,”  Daniel Fernandez Torres, in Puerto Rico who disagreed with other “bishops” on the American commonwealth concerning vaccine mandates (see www.christorchaos.com/?q=content/jorge-sure-knows-how-lower-boom-fast-wh...">http://www.christorchaos.com/?q=content/jorge-sure-knows-how-lower-boom-...">Jorge Sure Knows How to Lower the Boom Fast When He Wants to Do So).

Dr. Peter McCullough, a prominent cardiologist and well-published medical scholar who has sacrificed much to oppose the treatment protocols of the “public health” “experts” and the vaccines that have done and are continuing to do so much harm, has warned the conciliar authorities, which he believes represent the Catholic Church, in the Vatican they are complicit in vaccine deaths:

Do you think that the emergency’s lessening now with the omicron variant, that it’s not as serious as it was?

Right, and it’s easily treatable, that’s my experience too. So the emergency phase of the pandemic is now over. Many countries have recognized that. Across the UK, they’ve dropped mandates. Sweden has done the same. Eight states now that have gone against the US president and dropped the mandates, and eight Democratic governors have done that. We’ve always been divided. You know something’s wrong when states within a certain country don’t all behave the same way. We all use the same currency. We all have similar criminal laws and stuff, but we’re widely divergent on COVID-19. We could be in New York State, and people won’t let you go into a building unless you have a mask and a vaccine card, but we can be in Dallas, Texas, and you can walk in and there’s no mask, no vaccine and no discussion. What does that tell you? We’re the same country, with the same virus, so what’s going on, if the virus is the same and the people are the same? The difference is what’s in the minds of people. So there’s two diseases: there’s COVID-19 the disease, and then there’s the mental disease of what we call https://malone.substack.com/p/mass-formation-psychosis">mass formation psychosis.

Do you think that the Pope, the Vatican and the bishops in general are adequately informed about these vaccines? From what you say, they seem not to be, but do you think they need to be listening to wider sources because at the Vatican they now have www.ncregister.com/news/vatican-s-covid-mandate-part-2-december-decree-r...">https://www.ncregister.com/news/vatican-s-covid-mandate-part-2-december-...">some of the strictest mandates in the world: You cannot enter unless you are vaccinated, or you’ve recovered, and you have to wear the N95 masks. What advice would you give to the Vatican about their policy on COVID?

The Vatican should drop all mandates, drop all restrictions, and drop all advocacy or concern for the vaccines. The Vatican immediately should start a public interest campaign on vaccine injuries and vaccine deaths. They should formally apologize for taking a position on the vaccines that’s been deleterious and they will have to account for potentially hundreds of thousands of lives lost due to the vaccine worldwide because the Vatican has violated what’s called the Nuremberg Code — the Vatican has violated a critical code of bioethics and they must immediately recognize this. They must immediately apologize for this grievous error that they’ve committed. The Nuremberg Code states that no one under any conditions must apply any pressure, coercion or threat of reprisal for any medical treatment or procedure done, and particularly when the procedure is new, it’s investigational, it’s experimental, and we don’t know the outcomes.

I’ve just gone over with you that this is genetic material injected in human bodies, and we have no idea how long this is going to last and how great the injuries are going to be. They look catastrophic just at the early view of this. The Vatican must reverse their position. They must listen to people in positions of authority, including myself — immediately. And I’m happy to talk directly to the Pope. This is not a problem of lack of education. The Vatican and all religious leaders have all the information they can possibly have. These systems are open systems. A group from France said in March of 2021, “Shut down the program, it’s not safe.” The https://edwardpentin.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Bruno-et-al-SARS-C...">paper that I published with [Roxana] Bruno and colleagues, a worldwide paper including Europe, implored all governments to install safety boards and start reviewing the safety data. An evidence-based consulting group in the UK in June of 2021 https://edwardpentin.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Lawrie-Unsafe-For-...">reported officially to the MHRA and said, “shut down the program.” We’ve had petitions calling for the program to be shut down. This is not a matter of lack of education. This is a problem of complicity. This will go down in history as the Vatican is complicit in the mass loss of life of people by injections.

The Vatican’s Pontifical Academy for Life has also https://edwardpentin.co.uk/vaticans-pontifical-academy-for-life-pushes-c...">advocated vaccines for children. What’s your view on that?

The younger we go in age group, the risk of COVID-19, the viral illness, progressively goes down. In fact, most children don’t even get it because they’ve already had it and it’s milder than the next common cold that they have. That means the relative harm of the vaccines is even greater. So it is abhorrent. It violates every bit of sacred, religious belief that we have in terms of protecting our family and protecting our children, that the Vatican is abrogating one of its principle, Old Testament beliefs which is to protect the children. This is not protecting children. This is overtly harming children. And the Vatican must immediately reverse its course.

The Pope has called vaccination “www.vaticannews.va/en/pope/news/2021-08/pope-francis-appeal-covid-19-vac...">https://www.vaticannews.va/en/pope/news/2021-08/pope-francis-appeal-covi...">an act of love” and a “www.voanews.com/a/pope-francis-calls-covid-19-vaccination-moral-obligati...">https://www.voanews.com/a/pope-francis-calls-covid-19-vaccination-moral-...">moral obligation” — would you be willing to offer your advice to the Vatican?

I would be more than happy. As you mentioned, I have 54 peer-reviewed publications on COVID-19. I have over 660 peer-reviewed publications in the National Library of Medicine. I’ve chaired or participated in 2000 days of safety monitoring boards. I’ve had COVID-19 myself twice. I’ve had a family member lose their life to COVID-19. I am an expert commentator on national TV every week for the last two years. I consider myself the most qualified person to opine on COVID-19 and the vaccines than anybody in the world and that can be messaged directly to the Pope. If he wants to talk to the top authority in the world, I am open to a conversation, but it won’t be comfortable for him. So he needs to be warned about this. This is important. One life lost is too many. This idea that it’s a gift, that the Pope is giving a gift of loss of life, is absolutely unacceptable, and it must be met with the strongest of all resistance.

We are at a very, very important point in human history. You can tell by the gravity of these findings and these revelations, this is not a debatable thing. People are losing their lives due to this vaccine.

And I can tell you this much: even if the vaccine really worked, which it doesn’t, but even if it really worked, people still could take their choice: That they could die with a vaccine or die with a respiratory illness, and it would be a choice. It would be a very difficult choice, but they could take a choice. But the fact that the vaccines don’t work and they simply offer an opportunity, a stochastic opportunity to die within a few days from taking the injection, they are wholly unacceptable.

There’s an analysis of mortality, and I’m glad we’re still on mortality because I think that’s the most primal thing that we can consider, published by Ron Kostoff, and the title of the paper is “www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221475002100161X">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221475002100161X">Why Are We Vaccinating Children?.” This is in the peer-reviewed literature. This has been presented twice by the way at the USFDA meetings in September, and October by external presenters. The cost of analysis says someone at age 65 is more likely to die with the vaccine than taking their chances with COVID-19 and dying of COVID-19 respiratory illness. There’s a fivefold greater chance of dying with the vaccine. This is because if you take your chances with COVID-19, you may or may not get the illness. You could be fastidious and not get much contact and get low exposure, and that doesn’t even factor in early treatment which according to my estimates means 90-95% reductions in hospitalization and death. So you can imagine that it’s a much better choice to just take your chances with the respiratory illness than take your chances with the vaccine. And people say, “well, it’s rare.” Well, I have to tell you when we’re up to 21,000 Americans, this is actually worse than a war. We never said war casualties were “rare.” We took note of every war casualty. Every single vaccine death should be taken seriously. We can’t just write off human life with a casual stroke of a pen. It’s unacceptable, it’s immoral, it’s illegal.

What is your view on the mandates? Given what you say about the vaccines, would you consider them grossly unjust?

There are other mandates. In our US university system, we have requirements for the students to [get] the meningococcal vaccine for meningitis. This is a standard. There’s a waiver system. You can opt out of it, but most people don’t, and 20 million kids a year take them meningococcal vaccine. You don’t see any protests over that. Why? Because it’s an antigen-based vaccine that doesn’t go everywhere in the body. It has a safe mechanism of action. It has a safety track record that’s pristine. Nobody dies of the meningococcal vaccine. It effectively eliminates the chances of getting meningococcal meningitis. So we don’t have outbreaks in colleges anymore. So I’m telling you, a perfectly safe and effective vaccine people would accept. And if the COVID-19 vaccines were perfectly safe and effective, number one, COVID-19 would be gone by now, it wouldn’t be around, and two, people would widely accept it. There wouldn’t be any debate. If the vaccines were safe and effective, nobody would be wearing N95 masks in the Vatican. Things ought to be self-apparent at this point.

There’s a self-apparency here that I think we can’t deny. We ought to start looking at this and be saying, “You know what, let’s just examine ourselves here, this is just not adding up.” Even internal behaviors are not adding up.

What has been the personal cost to you of involving yourself in this cause?

I had no interest in becoming a public figure on this. My entire career and personal finances have been absolutely destroyed through this but I cannot stand by and watch this happen without speaking out. I do not see how any Christian can. It boils down to this idea of complicity. The Bible is loaded with phrases like this. If you stand by and you’re quiet and you watch it happen, you are participating in the crime. It’s clear.

The Church therefore has a duty to speak up.

Yes, there’s no doubt about it. (https://edwardpentin.co.uk/top-covid-19-expert-vatican-violating-code-of...">Top COVID-19 Expert: Vatican Violating Code of Bioethics, Must End Vaccine Mandate Now. The full interview is a must read. It is appended below in Appendix E.)

Dr. McCullough is indeed very correct, of course, as the vaccines to “protect” against the coronavirus are indeed the “most lethal biological product ever used in human history—period.”

What Dr. McCullough, who is a Methodist, does not realize, though, is that a man who has no care for the binding, immutable nature of dogmatic truth will not have any care for empirical truths on the merely natural level. It is for this reason that Jorge Mario Bergoglio has appointed numerous population-controlling pro-aborts to “pontifical” councils and academies. Here is a brief reminder of some of those appointees:

ROME, Italy, June 16, 2017 (http://lifesitenews.com/">LifeSiteNews) — The head of the Vatican’s Pontifical Academy for Life defended Pope Francis' appointment of a new Academy member who is pro-abortion and has expressed qualified support for euthanasia. Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia has, moreover, accused Catholic media of “sensationalism” for highlighting the pro-abortion pick.

When a Twitter user pointed out to Paglia that English Catholic media outlets were focusing on the pro-abortion appointee, he suggested Catholic media was falling victim to “sensationalism.” 

“[W]e pray that Catholics and Catholic media not fall victim to sensationalism,” he tweeted. “Love for life must mean love for each other.”

University of Oxford Professor Nigel Biggar, who was appointed to the Academy for a five-year term, stated in a 2011 dialogue with pro-infanticide ethicist Peter Singer that a preborn baby is “not … the same kind of thing as an adult or a mature human being” and therefore does not deserve “quite the same treatment.”

I would be inclined to draw the line for abortion at 18 weeks after conception, which is roughly about the earliest time when there is some evidence of brain activity, and therefore of consciousness,” he said as http://standpointmag.co.uk/node/3990/full">reported by Standpoint magazine.

Then, one year later, when he was the http://mcdonaldcentre.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/biggar-mayo-clinic-sec...">keynote speaker for an event at the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota, he said "it is not true that all abortion is equivalent to murder."

When LifeSiteNews asked Biggar if his appointment to the Academy indicated that the Church under Francis is shifting gears on abortion, he said that as someone who is not Roman Catholic, he did not think it appropriate to comment on the Church's position.

"I am very sorry to disappoint you, but the issue of abortion is one on which I have views, but it is not one that I have thought about for a very long time," he said. 

"I believe that the reason for my recent appointment lies in my sustained work on the issues of voluntary euthanasia and assisted suicide. On those issues, my conclusions are consonant with the Church's," he added.

But Biggar’s position on euthanasia is not, in fact, consonant with Catholic teaching. 

In a review of Biggar's 2004 book titled Aiming to Kill: The Ethics of Suicide and Euthanasia, reviewer David Jones wrote for the periodical New Blackfriars that Biggar would allow some people to be euthanized who were so damaged that they could be excluded from being called “human.”  

“If someone’s brain is irreparably damaged so that he or she cannot think, then according to Biggar we should conclude that he or she is no longer a human ‘person’ and no longer part of the human community. Biggar even describes such individuals as ‘irretrievably inaccessible to human care’ so that it means nothing to protect them from being killed nor therefore (and this is my deduction) to visit, clothe or feed them,” wrote Jones. 

Christopher Ferrara, author and head of the American Catholic Lawyer’s Association, said an appointment of a pro-abortion member to the Vatican’s highest pro-life institution means that Pope Francis, “as incredible as it may seem, is programmatically committed to accommodating … the toleration of abortion in the life of the Church.”

“[He has] demolished John Paul II’s Pontifical Academy for Life by sacking every one of its members and having its new president, the ‘pro-gay’ Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia (of www.lifesitenews.com/news/vatican-archbishop-defends-cathedrals-x-rated-...">https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/vatican-archbishop-defends-cathedrals-...">obscene mural fame), draw up new statutes for the Academy,” he wrote, adding: “Bear in mind that Pope [Francis] has abolished the pro-life oath formerly taken by members of the Academy.”

Former Academy member Judie Brown, president of American Life League, said the Academy under Pope Francis’ leadership has lost its way. 

“Pope Francis has created a revised version of the sainted Pope John Paul II’s vision that is not only scary, but also in many ways ugly to behold,” she www.all.org/death-and-the-pontifical-academy-for-life/?CategoryId=1">http://www.all.org/death-and-the-pontifical-academy-for-life/?CategoryId=1">wrote.  

While there are many positive appointments to the Academy, such as Cardinal Willem Eijk, Georgetown ethicist John Keown, and Knights of Columbus Supreme Knight Carl Anderson, there are many former members, high-caliber pro-lifers, who were not invited back. Many of these were specifically chosen by Pope John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI for their pro-life-and-family credentials as well as their fidelity to Catholic teaching. 

Some of those not invited back include Australian philosopher John Finnis, German philosopher Robert Spaemann, Professor Luke Gormally of England, and Austrian Professor Josef Maria Seifert. Many of those not invited back had previously been openly critical of the direction the Academy was being pushed in recent years. (www.lifesitenews.com/news/pontifical-academy-for-life-chief-defends-pro-...">https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pontifical-academy-for-life-chief-defe...">Pro-Abort to Head "Pontifical" Academy for Life.)

What the well-intentioned, incredulous author of the report from several years ago did not understand is that everything about the counterfeit church of conciliarism is ugly, and that includes the conciliar “popes’” aforementioned warfare against the nature of dogmatic truth and his incessant acts of obeisance to false religions, false places of worship and the idols and symbols of false religion. Those who do not see this are forever expressing “outrage” at what are simply the logical consequences of endorsing dogmatic evolutionism and of making a mockery of the First, Second, and Third Commandments. Once you do that, of course, it is relatively easy to make a mockery of the Fourth through Tenth Commandments.

It is really as simple as this: attack the immutable nature of God and His Divine Revelation lead inevitably to attacks upon each of the Ten Commandments, including the Fifth, Sixth, and Ninth Commandments. It is my own personal hope and prayer that Dr. McCullough will come to see this truth that is, truth be told, as simple to accept as the truths concerning the origins of the coronavirus and the harmful nature of the vaccines as the Protestant Revolution against the Divine Plan that God instituted to effect man’s return to Him through His Catholic Church is what got us into this mess in the first place.

Nevertheless, however, Dr. McCullough is absolutely correct about the moral culpability of those within the walls of the Occupied Vatican on the West Bank of the Tiber River concerning the ongoing genocide that is taking place in the name of “love,” to cite Bergoglio’s own description of getting jabbed with these poisoned potions.  They all bear moral culpability in the vaccine genocide taking place at this time.

The Argentine Apostate, however, is as impervious to the truths about the harmful nature of these recently developed gene-therapy treatments (vaccines) as many anti-sedevacantists are to plainly stated facts of Catholic doctrine concerning the nature of the papacy and the inerrant nature of Holy Mother Church on all that pertains to Faith and Morals. Bergoglio continues to “double down,” as the saying goes these downs, on his support for Big Pharma’s ceaseless efforts to inject more and more poisons into the bodies of more and more people as its executives and shareholders reap handsome profits in the process.

As Dr. McCullough pointed out, the fake news is all on the side of the vaccinators and their apologists in every nook and cranny of what passes for popular culture globally. Nothing can seem to penetrate what a reasonable person must conclude is a conscious decision to ignore the actual facts of the great harm, some of which was documented above in this commentary as it has been in previous entries in this series, done by the “vaccines” that will continue to have consequences on those who have received them and will continue to receive them whenever the “experts” say they must do so to “protect” themselves and others long after many of us are dead and buried. To blind oneself to the reality of what is happening and then to denounce those who are telling the truth as purveyors of “fake news” is the work of the devil himself.

Indeed, religious sisters in English whose community’s founding charism is to adore Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ in His Real Presence (even though, obviously, it is the case Our Lord is not in hosts “consecrated” at the Novus Ordo liturgical abomination) have been reported to the Gestapo—excuse me, the conciliar authorities in the Vatican—for merely having stepped out onto their front steps to signify their support for an anti-lockdown, anti-vaccine mandate protest in London:

DURING the anti-lockdown Unite for Freedom rally London in May last year, protesters were greeted by Benedictine nuns who www.newsflare.com/video/431363/cheerful-london-nuns-hug-anti-lockdown-pr...">https://www.newsflare.com/video/431363/cheerful-london-nuns-hug-anti-loc...">emerged from their convent on the north side of Hyde Park to hug them and shake their hands. 

None of the nuns wore a mask and, without doubt, some were not vaccinated; they shared the scepticism over the restrictions on freedom held by the people they embraced on Bayswater Road.  

Now the ‘www.tyburnconvent.org.uk/">https://www.tyburnconvent.org.uk/">Tyburn Nuns’ have been reported by the Archdiocese of Westminster to the Vatican following external complaints in connection with views some of them expressed about the Covid vaccination programme.  

The archdiocese has no jurisdiction over the order – properly called the Adorers of the Sacred Heart of Jesus of Montmartre OSB – because it is a Congregation of Pontifical Right, answerable directly to Rome. So the complaints were referred to the Vatican’s Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life.  

This dicastery, or department, could decide to initiate a visitation of Tyburn Convent. If anyone has it in for the nuns, they will now be rubbing their hands at the prospect of a severe penalty coming their way. This is because a visitation is a very serious matter carrying potentially grave consequences.  

Only last week it emerged that the Benedictine Monastery of Santa Caterina in Perugia, Italy, was closed following a visitation which found the community to be functioning spiritually, economically and liturgically, but whichwww.churchmilitant.com/news/article/cardinal-shuts-down-convent-of-unjab...">https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/cardinal-shuts-down-convent-..."> objected to the refusal of the nuns to be vaccinated.

The last time a high-profile English religious house was subject to a visitation was in 2009, some four months before Pope Benedict XVI came to Birmingham to beatify St John Henry Newman.  

It resulted in the evisceration of the Birmingham Oratory, the community founded by Newman, with three of its prominent members not only expelled, but removed from the UK. One was exclaustrated (banished and confined) to a monastery in Ireland, another was sent to join a religious house in South Africa and a third was packed off to a community in Canada.  [Droleskey note: For a separate story on those presbyters, please see http://freethebirminghamoratorythree.blogspot.com/2010/09/priest-is-excl...">Free the B3: Justice for Fr. Dermot Fenlon: Priest is excluded from the Birmingham Oratory.]

Similar ‘internal housekeeping’ against the Tyburn Nuns would threaten one of the most successful female religious orders in the Catholic Church at a time when vocations among women have steeply declined.  

Since the foundation of their order in Paris in 1898, and relocation a few years later to the site of the Tyburn gallows (upon which 105 Catholic men and women died as martyrs between 1535 and 1681), the nuns have opened convents in France, Ireland, Scotland, Italy, Australia, New Zealand, Colombia, Peru and Ecuador.  

Pope Francis sent the nuns the gift of a golden chalice when the sainthood cause of their French foundress, Mother Marie Adele Garnier, was opened by the Bishop of Langres, France, in 2015 and three years later they welcomed the first Tyburn Monks as the order extended to accept men.  

It would not be unreasonable to expect the Church might want to know more about the secret of the nuns’ success, to find out what makes them attractive and to learn from them. But its attitude to the pandemic is beyond the pale.  

Even before the complaint was made against them, their position triggered correspondence between Mother Marilla Aw, the Mother General of the order and the daughter of two Australian doctors, and Auxiliary Bishop John Sherrington of Westminster.  

An archdiocesan spokesman explained that ‘with respect to vaccines, the Catholic Church’s position is clear that take-up of the Covid vaccine is to be encouraged for the good of all’.  

This was ‘clearly stated on a number of occasions’ in the correspondence, she added, and the bishop ‘shared the Pope’s comments and the guidance from the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of England and Wales in support of the vaccine programme.  

‘He also expressed concern about the support that Mother Marilla had given to anti-vaccine protests and comments she had made criticising the vaccine programme.’  

Mother Marilla responded by saying that as far as she was concerned the nuns have a right to make up their own minds about vaccination and by pointing out that Church teaching does not support coercive medication.  

She cited the position set out clearly by the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in December 2020 when it stated that www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_...">https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con...">vaccination was not a ‘moral obligation’ and must be ‘voluntary’. It also said vaccines must be ‘safe and effective’. 

The latest figures from the UK Government’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), reported on this website, show however that one in every 117 people injected reported an adverse ‘Yellow Card’ reaction and www.conservativewoman.co.uk/covid-vaccine-damage-figures-head-for-half-a...">https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/covid-vaccine-damage-figures-head-fo...">more than 2,000 people have died directly as a result of a Covid jab. The MHRA itself says these figures could be only 10 per cent of the actual numbers.

The position of the Tyburn Nuns is further supported by the Oxford-based Anscombe Centre for Healthcare Ethics, the bioethics institute serving the Catholic Church in the UK and Ireland. It has opposed vaccination of children and has defended NHS and social care workers who www.bioethics.org.uk/detail/resources/press_statements">http://www.bioethics.org.uk/detail/resources/press_statements">refused to accept vaccine mandates, describing coercive vaccination as ‘profoundly unethical’. 

It could be argued, therefore, that the Tyburn Nuns are simply following their consciences as well as the teachings of the Church.   

This is more than can be said for the Vatican, which in December flouted its own rules by declaring that all employees must be vaccinated against the coronavirus or show proof of having recovered from it. Bishops in some US dioceses as well as in Austria, Germany, Australia and New Zealand have shown a similar appetite for vaccine mandates.  

Bishops in the most liberal areas of the Western world are showing the greatest propensity for authoritarianism and the treatment of some sceptics has been heavy-handed indeed.  

Take, for example, that of Father Emanuele Personeni, suspended because he made an anti-mandate pilgrimage across Italy in www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/bully-bishop-fires-anti-vax-mandate-...">https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/bully-bishop-fires-anti-vax-...">protest at all over-50s being forced to accept a Covid vaccination.

Bishop Francesco Beschi of Bergamo disowned him, declared vaccination to be a moral as well as a legal obligation and forbade parishes from hosting any of his talks.  

The mayor of Bergamo urged Bishop Beschi to go further and to also suspend Father Alessandro Nava and Father Andrea Testa because they had joined Father Personeni in co-authoring a pamphlet against forced vaccination.  

Yet surely it is not wrong to point out that while the vaccines may be effective in modifying the symptoms of Covid-19 and reducing hospital admissions, ventilation and death in some people, they are not wholly safe to others.  

Nor is it offensive to say that not one of the vaccines has completed a phase three drug trial, so there is no data on any potential long-term adverse effects, such as what they might do to the fertility of young people.  

Free and informed consent is the nub of the issue. But this, like in so many other areas of life and society, has been increasingly obscured within the Church by a global pandemic of healthcare demagoguery.  

It doesn’t seem to matter to many people that both the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki – the cornerstone document on human research ethics – and the Nuremberg Code of 1947 embraced the principle of informed consent as an ethical and legal obligation of medical care.  

But it does matter. People need to know about the efficacy and the safety of any medication for their consent to be informed, and if they are not convinced then none – nuns included – has a duty to accept it.  

Consent not only means that any person with capacity may make a choice to accept treatment, but also that they may refuse treatment for any reason or for no reason. Even if their decisions seem unwise to others, they must be legally entitled to make them. It is what helps to keep everyone else free.  

The official teaching of the Catholic Church in support of this is, as it stands, sound and correct. For those in authority to ignore such teaching while accusing others of misconduct is tantamount to hypocrisy. Jesus had quite a lot to say about that. (www.conservativewoman.co.uk/anti-vaccine-tyburn-nuns-stand-up-to-authori...">https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/anti-vaccine-tyburn-nuns-stand-up-to...">Anti-vaccine Tyburn Nuns stand up to authoritarian Vatican. For a story about the presbyter in the Diocese of Bergamo, Italy, please see: www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/bully-bishop-fires-anti-vax-mandate-...">https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/bully-bishop-fires-anti-vax-...">Bully Bishop Fires Priest Leading Vax Revolt.)

Yes, Jorge Mario Bergoglio, the false “pope” of false “mercy,” has limitless tolerance for those of his “bishops” who go beyond even his own outlandish, heretical statements and actions as they are playing their roles as perverse prophets to make it possible for him to perversely claim that the “holy spirit” is “clearly” leading his false religious sect in the direction of (fill in the blank) whatever “change” Bergoglio himself believes should be adopted in the name of “mercy” or “updating” or “listening to the people.” Countless are the numbers of these “bishops,” who are scattered all throughout the world. Perhaps the most prominent examples in this country today are Rene Cupich (Chicago), Joseph Tobin (Newark, New Jersey), John Stowe (Lexington, Kentucky), and Wilton Gregory (Washington, District of Columbia), a direct acolyte of the late, corrupt Joseph “Cardinal” Bernardin. These are Jorge’s boys, and they can make whatever outlandish statements they want as they only doing his bidding for him. They are his enforcers and his field agents in making messes of things.

Men such as these are congregated all over the European continent and all throughout Asia. There is Jean-Claude Hollerich in Luxembourg, Reinhard Marx in Munich-Freising, Germany, Rainier Woelki in Cologne, Germany, Peter Kohlgraf in Mainz, Germany, Franz-Josef Overbeck of Essen, Germany, and so many scores upon scores of others, most of whom are full-throated supporters of the entire panoply of the sodomite agenda, women priests to be bound thereby, have been kept "safe" by Jorge, wo is busy promoting a “synodal way” that makes it appear that the process of Divine Revelation is “ongoing” and there must be a constant process of “discernment” concerning how what purports to be Catholic teaching should be “adjusted” in light of what the “people” want.

If anyone dares to dissent from the lie that the profit-making, experimental gene-therapy potions (vaccines) that were created to “protect” against a mostly non-lethal virus IF, as Dr. Peter McCullough, it is treated properly in its early stages, however, then the authorities in the conciliar Vatican and their apparatchiks worldwide stand at the ready to lower the boom without any mercy, toleration or hesitancy whatsoever.

Mother Marilla, though, is no wilting wallflower. She has come out swinging against the false representations made against her by the Sunday Times of London and by the officials within the Archdiocese of Westminister in its conciliar captivity. Mother Marilla took no prisoners as she pointed out the conciliar Vatican’s violation of its own “official” position in opposition to coercing people to get vaccinated while instituting just such a policy within its own walls and she was just as fearless in tackling the English equivalent of the supposed “newspaper of record”:

LONDON (www.lifesitenews.com/">https://www.lifesitenews.com/">LifeSiteNews) — The Mother Superior of London’s Tyburn convent issued a statement in response to an article saying she was reported to the Vatican after sisters complained they felt “under pressure not to have the vaccine.”

Mother General Marilla, whose revelation that she had received 50 prayer requests for people who died after COVID jabs went viral last year, responded yesterday to the Sunday Times www.thetimes.co.uk/article/55187558-a798-11ec-a0e9-23fd932feb90?shareTok...">https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/55187558-a798-11ec-a0e9-23fd932feb90?..." target="_blank">article “Antivax Mother General reported to the Vatican,” to correct misinformation about her and her convent, and provide missing information about her approach to COVID “vaccination” for her sisters.

Marilla explained in her statement, shared with LifeSiteNews, that one of the authors of the Times article, David Collins, had called her prior to its publishing, telling her “that there were sisters from the convent making allegations” that she was “bullying them into not taking the vaccine.” According to Marilla, this was the first time she had heard of these allegations, but Collins was “not able to tell” her which sisters were making them.

Marilla wrote, “Throughout 2021 I have expressed clearly to every sister in our Institute that it is my right and also a moral duty to express my opinion regarding these anti-Covid injections, but they have the complete freedom of choice of whether they wish to take the anti-Covid injections or not. I have communicated this by email, by writing on the community chalkboard and also verbally to a few individual sisters.”

“I, in fact, do not know the vaccine status of any of our sisters because I have not asked them. It is their own business and I do not pry into it,” she continued.

Marilla, who is the worldwide leader of the Benedictine congregation of the Adorers of the Sacred Heart of Jesus of Montmartre, then shared her “most recent email to the entire Congregation” regarding the subject, which was sent on April 28, 2021:

Subject: Free Choice

“Dear RM Prioress,

Would you please explain to the sisters that they have the right to choose whether they wish to take the Covid 19 vaccine or not.

I do not force anyone to take the vaccine nor do I force anyone not to take the vaccine. If any sister wishes to take the vaccine she is free to make an appointment to have the injection of the vaccine.

I only ask for the safety of the community that any sister who has taken the vaccine that she isolate for a period of time.

With my blessings to all.

Yours devotedly in the Eucharistic Heart,

Mother Marilla OSB

Mother General

Marilla called out the Sunday Times’ “misinformation” contained in the following statement from their article: “While many of the nuns at the convent have taken a vow of silence and rarely set foot in the outside world, Marilla has taken to the streets during anti-lockdown protests, filmed by demonstrators preaching about the vaccine being extremely dangerous.”

She corrected this claim, writing, “None of our sisters have taken a vow of silence. In addition, it is quite clear on the videos taken during the particular demonstration mentioned that I was on the front doorstep of Tyburn Convent. I strongly defend my right to be standing on our convent’s front doorstep.”

She also reproved the article’s title description of herself as “antivax,” pointing out that she has www.lifesitenews.com/news/brave-nun-warns-people-away-from-covid-jab-cit...">https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/brave-nun-warns-people-away-from-covid...">shared publicly that before COVID-19 she would “most likely have described” herself as “Pro-vax,” since she has “had many, many vaccines from early childhood.”

“However, regarding the anti-Covid injection I would most definitely consider myself vaccine hesitant,” she added.

Marilla said she had “been threatened on numerous occasions to be reported to the Holy See and in particular to the [Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life] for reasons of perceived non-compliance.”

In these cases,” she wrote, “those who have issued such threats have almost entirely ignored fundamental rights.” She further explained that the “opinions” she has expressed about the COVID injections “have arisen out of a genuine and reasonable concern for the safety and health issues” arising from these shots.

Marilla shared with LifeSiteNews last summer that in addition to prayer requests regarding post-injection deaths, her convent had received prayer requests “for over a hundred people who have been injured” after the injection, adding, “we have lost count of how many because there are too many.” Reported injuries shared with the sisters included blood clots, incidents of blindness, and even one case of paralysis in a young woman who took the jab in order to keep her job.

She had also told LifeSiteNews that while she saw that people were dying from what she called a “manipulated virus” — including some family members of the convent’s sisters — they were “asked to pray for many more people who have died from the COVID-19 vaccines than the virus itself.”

“It is deeply disturbing that instead of a willingness to investigate or even take seriously these concerns I have received instead reprimands, threats, and vilification,” Marilla wrote in yesterday’s statement.

She concluded with an appeal to those who been killed or injured by the COVID jab:

“​​I speak up now for those who have asked our prayers, who are grieving for loved ones who have died shortly after taking the anti-Covid injections. I speak up now for the hundreds of people who have asked our prayers for ongoing, painful and serious injury after taking the anti-Covid injections. In conscience I must speak up.”

“Who has the liability for any death or injury resulting from these anti-Covid injections? Who is to compensate for all that they have suffered? It is long past the time to speak up for them. They are ignored, they are dismissed, they have no one to turn to. They have turned to us to ask our prayers, and we are praying for them and sacrificing for them,” Marilla wrote. (www.lifesitenews.com/news/783073/">https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/783073/">Mother Superior responds to Sunday Times article on complaints against her submitted to Vatican.)

Indeed, “who has the liability for any death or injury resulting from these anti-Covid injections? Who is to compensate for all that they have suffered?”

Well, we know as Catholics that those responsible for the deaths and injuries caused by the vaccines/gene therapy treatment will be held accountable by Christ the King, Our Divine Judge, when they die if they do not repent and convert beforehand. Those responsible for the vaccine genocide that

We must pray for Mother Marilla to come to accept the true state of the Church Militant on earth in this time of apostasy and betrayal as she is completely unafraid to stand up against powerful newspapers and even the hypocrisy of the ideologues who work for the Vatican in its conciliar captivity. (For a story about the foundress of the Tyburn Sisters, whose cause is being advanced within the conciliar structures, please see: www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/34742/nun-who-witnessed-multiple-euchari...">https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/34742/nun-who-witnessed-multiple...">Nun who witnessed multiple Eucharistic miracles on path to sainthood.)

For our part, of course, we must continue to beg Our Lord to continue here to the truth, and truth is that the counterfeit church of conciliarism is not and can never be the Catholic Church. It is easy to regress. We know too many people who have sought out advice from neo-Gallicanists because they want to give up the truth, whether because of a desire for “peace” with their family members or just so that they will no longer be told that they are "outside of the Church" for refusing to accept the legitimacy of the conciliar officials.

However, we must look at the evidence as to who is truly outside of the Catholic Church, and it is not those who reject the legitimacy of the spiritual robber barons of conciliarism.

Yet it is that many in the "recognize but resist" movement continue to attack sedevacantism as not being a canonical doctrine of the Catholic Church, no less that it applies in these incredible times of apostasy and betrayal, even though a conciliar "cardinal," Mario Francesco Pompedda, who headed the Occupy Vatican Movement's Apostolic Signatura for seven years, said seventeen years ago that sedevacantism is indeed part of the Church's canonical doctrine:

It is true that the canonical doctrine states that the see would be vacant in the case of heresy. ... But in regard to all else, I think what is applicable is what judgment regulates human acts. And the act of will, namely a resignation or capacity to govern or not govern, is a human act. (www.zenit.org/article-12193?l=english">http://www.zenit.org/article-12193?l=english">Cardinal Says Pope Could Govern Even If Unable to Speak, Zenit, February 8, 2005; see also see also Gregorius's www.novusordowatch.org/the_chair_is_still_empty.htm">http://www.novusordowatch.org/the_chair_is_still_empty.htm" target="_blank">The Chair is Still Empty.)

Unlike what many traditionally-minded Catholics have heard from the theologians of the Society of Saint Pius X, however, Pompedda was intellectually honest enough to admit that sedevacantism is indeed a part of the canonical doctrine of the Catholic Church. Only a handful of Catholics, priests and laity alike, accepted this doctrine and recognized that it applied in our circumstances in the immediate aftermath of the "Second" Vatican Council. I was not one of them.

To claim that we cannot know what is "heretical," as some priests/presbyters and members of the laity attached to the stuctures of the counterfeit church of conciliarism contend with great vehemence, is to endorse a form of the Kantian belief that it is impossible to know what is true.

Truth is.

Truth exists, and truth exists independently of human acceptance of it and in spite of the bad and perhaps even scandalaous witness that those embrace and profess it may demonstrate at times.

We separate ourselves from the conciliarists because they offend God by defecting from the Faith, starting with their rejection of the nature of dogmatic truth and their making complex what it is: the knowledge of Him that He has deposited in Holy Mother Church.

Here is a stark truth: Attack the nature of dogmatic truth, open the doors wide to the likes of George Soros as those who are responsible for the slaughter of souls of Catholics and non-Catholics alike, will wind up allying themselves with those who human beings in the name of "compassion."

Although there are those who tell us that we should "stay and fight" in once Catholic parishes that now in the hands of apostates (or their enablers who refuse to speak out against them), we must recognize that offenses against the doctrines of the Faith and offenses against the moral order are never the foundations upon which God will choose to restore His Holy Church. Truth in the moral order is as black and white as truth in the doctrinal realm. Conciliarism consists of its very nature in a rejection of various parts of the Catholic Faith, and it is this rejection that leads in turn to the same sort of despair and hopelessness in the souls of so many men now as existed at the time before the First Coming of Our Lord at His Incarnation and, nine months later, His Nativity.

We do not need to conduct a "search" for the "true meaning" of the doctrines contained the Sacred Deposit of Faith. We accept what has been handed down to us as docile children of Holy Mother Church.

We must hate heresy. Hate it.

Why?

Because God hates heresy and everything to do with it, a point that will be made yet again in part two of this series tomorrow.

The only way to deal with the Antichrists in the world, men and women who have a set of "values," if you will, to which they are absolutely committed without any compromise or exception whatsoever, and their enablers in the counterfeit church of conciliarism is to adhere and to profess openly the truths of the Social Reign of Christ the King without fear of the consequences. We are not likely to see "results" in our lifetimes. That does not matter. The only thing that matters is that we persevere in a State of Sanctifying Grace as a member of the Catholic Church until the point of our dying breath while simply planting the seeds for the conversion of conversion of men and their nations to the true Faith, outside of which there is no salvation and without which there can be no true social order.

V. As Always, To See All Things in Light of the Holy Faith

As good as the secular commentators whose works have been quoted in this commentary are, expertise on the natural level only takes one so far. As Pope Saint Pius X noted in Singulari Quadam, September 24, 1912, we must see all things exclusively through the light of the Holy Faith at all times and without any exception whatsoever:

Accordingly, We first of all declare that all Catholics have a sacred and inviolable duty, both in private and public life, to obey and firmly adhere to and fearlessly profess the principles of Christian truth enunciated by the teaching office of the Catholic Church. In particular We mean those principles which Our Predecessor has most wisely laid down in the encyclical letter "Rerum Novarum." We know that the Bishops of Prussia followed these most faithfully in their deliberations at the Fulda Congress of 1900. You yourselves have summarized the fundamental ideas of these principles in your communications regarding this question.

These are fundamental principles: No matter what the Christian does, even in the realm of temporal goods, he cannot ignore the supernatural good. Rather, according to the dictates of Christian philosophy, he must order all things to the ultimate end, namely, the Highest Good. All his actions, insofar as they are morally either good or bad (that is to say, whether they agree or disagree with the natural and divine law), are subject to the judgment and judicial office of the Church. All who glory in the name of Christian, either individually or collectively, if they wish to remain true to their vocation, may not foster enmities and dissensions between the classes of civil society. On the contrary, they must promote mutual concord and charity. The social question and its associated controversies, such as the nature and duration of labor, the wages to be paid, and workingmen's strikes, are not simply economic in character. Therefore they cannot be numbered among those which can be settled apart from ecclesiastical authority. "The precise opposite is the truth. It is first of all moral and religious, and for that reason its solution is to be expected mainly from the moral law and the pronouncements of religion." (Pope Saint Pius X, Singulari Quadam, Sepetember 24, 1912.)

The modern world, shaped as it is by the anti-Incarnational lies of Judeo-Masonry and its hatred for the Social Reign of Christ the King and of the true Social Teaching of the Catholic Church, she who is our mater and magister (mother and teacher), is shaped by amorality in almost every aspect of public life and what passes for “popular culture” in these wicked times that celebrate every form of licentiousness, including wanton misuse of the gift that God has given to man to bring forth new souls to give Him honor and glory in this life and to spend all eternity with Him in Heaven after dying as faithful sons and daughters of Holy Mother Church and the subsequent killing off of children by self-centered parents who live without regard to their Particular Judgment and of outright perversity of the sort that destroyed the cities of Sodom and Gommorha.

Amorality is practiced by the members of each of the two major organized crime families of naturalism in the United States of America. Violations of the Seventh and Eighth Commandments are the norm, not the exception, today as politicians of the false opposites of the naturalist “right” and the “left” outdo each other in stealing what rightfully belongs to the taxpayers to aggrandize the power of the civil state and in lying about each other with a shameless disregard, borne of ignorance in many instances, of the fact that they will have to make an accounting of everything that they have ever thought, done or said when they face the Divine Judge, Christ the King, at the moment of their Particular Judgments.

Saint Alphonsus de Liguori explained that no one, including those who justify a fission between “private belief” and public action, will escape the strict scrutiny of every aspect of his life after he dies:

2. It is the common opinion of theologians, that at the very moment and in the very place in which the soul departs from the body, the divine tribunal is erected, the accusation is read, and the sentence is passed by Jesus Christ, the Judge. At this terrible tribunal each of us shall be presented to give an account of all our thoughts, of all our words, and of all our actions. "For we must all be manifested before the judgment seat of Christ, that every one may receive the proper things of the body, according as he hath done, whether it be good or evil." ( 2 Cor. v. 10.) When presented before an earthly judge criminals have been seen to fall into a cold sweat through fear. It is related of Piso, that so great and insufferable was the confusion, which he felt at the thought of appearing as a criminal before the senate that he killed himself. How great is the pain of a vassal, or of a son, in appearing before an angry prince or an enraged father, to account for some crime which he has committed! Oh! how much greater shall be the pain and confusion of the soul in standing, before Jesus Christ enraged against her for having despised him during her life! Speaking of judgment, St. Luke says: "Then you shall see the Son of Man." (Luke xxi. 27.) They shall see Jesus Christ as man, with the same wounds with which he ascended into heaven. "Great joy of the beholders!" says Robert the Abbot, "a great terror of those who are in expectation!" These wounds shall console the just, and shall terrify the wicked. In them sinners shall see the Redeemer’s love for themselves, and their ingratitude to him.

3. "Who," says the Prophet Nahum, "can stand before the face of his indignation ?" (i. 6.) How great, then, shall be the terror of a soul that finds herself in sin before this Judge, the first time she shall see him, and see him full of wrath! St. Basil says that she shall be tortured more by her shame and confusion than by the very fire of hell. ”Horridior quam ignis, erit pudor." Philip the Second rebuked one of his domestics for having told him a lie. ”Is it thus," said the king to him, ”you deceive me?" The domestic, after having returned home, died of grief. The Scripture tells us, that when Joseph reproved his brethren, saying: ”I am Joseph, whom you sold," they were unable to answer through fear, and remained silent. ”His brethren could not answer him, being struck with exceeding great fear." (Gen. xlv. 3.) Now what answer shall sinners make to Jesus Christ when he shall say to them: I am your Redeemer and your Judge, whom you have so much despised. Where shall the miserable beings fly, says St. Augustine, when they shall see an angry Judge above, hell open below, on one side their own sins accusing them, and on the other the devils dragging them to punishment, and their conscience burning them within? “Above shall be an enraged Judge below, a horrid chaos on the right, sins accusing him on the left, demons dragging him to punishment within, a burning conscience! Whither shall a sinner, beset in this manner, fly ?"Perhaps he will cry for mercy? But how, asks Eusebius Emissenus, can he dare to implore mercy, when he must first render an account of his contempt for the mercy which Jesus Christ has shown to him?” With what face will you, who are to be first judged for contempt of mercy, ask for mercy?" But let us come to the rendering of the accounts. . . .

11. How great shall be the joy of a soul when, at death, she hears from Jesus Christ these sweet words: ”Well done, good and faithful servant; because thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will place thee over many things. Enter thou into the joy of thy Lord." (Matt. xxv. 21.) Equally great shall be the anguish and despair of a guilty soul, that shall see herself driven away by the Judge with the following words: ”Depart from me, you cursed, into everlasting fire" (verse 41). Oh! what a terrible thunderclap shall that sentence be to her!”Oh! how frightfully," says the Carthusian, "shall that thunder resound!" Eusebius writes, that the terror of sinners at hearing their condemnation shall be so great that, if they could, they would die again. “The wicked shall be seized with such terror at the sight of the Judge pronouncing sentence that, if they were not immortal, they should die a second time." But, brethren, let us, before the termination of this sermon, make some reflections which will be profitable to us. St. Thomas of Villanova says, that some listen to discourses on the judgment and condemnation of the wicked with as little concern as if they they themselves were secure against these things, or as if the day of judgment were never to arive for them. "Heu quam securi hæc dicimus et audimus, quasi nos non tangeret hæc sententia, aut quasi dies hæc nunquam esset venturus!" (Conc, i., de Jud.) The saint then asks: Is it not great folly to entertain security in so perilous an affair? "Quæ est ista stulta securitas in discrimine tanto?" There are some, says St. Augustine, who, though they live in sin, cannot imagine that God will send them to hell. ”Will God," they say, ”really condemn us ?" Brethren, adds the saint, do not speak thus. So, many of the damned did not believe that they should be sent to hell; but the end came, and, according to the threat of Ezechiel, they have been cast into that place of darkness. "The end is come, the end is come... and I will send my wrath upon thee, and I will judge thee." (Ezec. vii. 2, 3.) Sinners, perhaps vengeance is at hand for you, and still you laugh and sleep in sin. Who will not tremble at the words of the Baptist: ”For now the axe is laid to the root of the trees. Every tree, therefore, that doth not yield good fruit shall be cut down and cast into the fire." (Matt, iii. 10.) He says, that every tree that does not bring forth good fruit shall be cut down and cast into the fire; and he promises that, with regard to the trees, which represent sinners, the axe is already laid to the roots that is, chastisement is at hand. Dearly beloved brethren, let us follow the counsel of the Holy Ghost "Before judgment, prepare thee justice." (Eccl. xviii. 19.) Let us adjust our accounts before the day of accounts. Let us seek God, now that we can find him; for the time shall come when we will wish, but shall not be able to find him. ”You shall seek me, and shall not find me." (John vii. 36.)” “Before judgment," says St. Augustine, ”the Judge can be appeased, but not in judgment." By a change of life we can now appease the anger of Jesus Christ, and recover his grace; but when he shall judge, and find us in sin, he must execute justice, and we shall be lost. (www.freewebs.com/wallmell/LiguoriSermonsForSunday.pdf">http://www.freewebs.com/wallmell/LiguoriSermonsForSunday.pdf">Sermons for All the Sundays in the Year by St Alphonsus Liguori in .pdf format; a sermon on the death of the sinner is appended at the end of this article.)

No one in public life today recognizes or accept this as true. More accurately, of course, almost no one in public life today knows of the terror that awaits them by their use of amorality in every aspect of their lives. Not Donald John Trump. Not Charles Schumer. Not Nancy Patricia D’Alesandro Pelosi. Not anyone, including many well-meaning Catholics who have been swept up in the falsehoods of the counterfeit church of conciliarism and its propagation of the heresy of universal salvation.

Permit me a slight digression as it is important to drive home the point that one cannot do whatever he wants without regard to the binding precepts of the Divine Positive Law and the Natural Law and expect to escape the fires of Hell for all eternity.

Even though Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ shed every single drop of His Most Precious Blood during His Passion and Death on the wood of the Holy Cross to redeem mankind, it is up to each person to avail himself of the merits of Our Lord’s Redemptive Act. Actually, of course, the number of those who are saved is very few:

Woe to you who command others! If so many are damned by your fault, what will happen to you? If few out of those who are first in the Church of God are saved, what will happen to you? Take all states, both sexes, every condition: husbands, wives, widows, young women, young men, soldiers, merchants, craftsmen, rich and poor, noble and plebian. What are we to say about all these people who are living so badly? The following narrative from Saint Vincent Ferrer will show you what you may think about it. He relates that an archdeacon in Lyons gave up his charge and retreated into a desert place to do penance, and that he died the same day and hour as Saint Bernard. After his death, he appeared to his bishop and said to him, "Know, Monsignor, that at the very hour I passed away, thirty-three thousand people also died. Out of this number, Bernard and myself went up to heaven without delay, three went to purgatory, and all the others fell into Hell."

Our chronicles relate an even more dreadful happening. One of our brothers, well-known for his doctrine and holiness, was preaching in Germany. He represented the ugliness of the sin of impurity so forcefully that a woman fell dead of sorrow in front of everyone. Then, coming back to life, she said, "When I was presented before the Tribunal of God, sixty thousand people arrived at the same time from all parts of the world; out of that number, three were saved by going to Purgatory, and all the rest were damned."

O abyss of the judgments of God! Out of thirty thousand, only five were saved! And out of sixty thousand, only three went to heaven! You sinners who are listening to me, in what category will you be numbered?... What do you say?... What do you think?...

I see almost all of you lowering your heads, filled with astonishment and horror. But let us lay our stupor aside, and instead of flattering ourselves, let us try to draw some profit from our fear.

Is it not true that there are two roads which lead to heaven: innocence and repentance? Now, if I show you that very few take either one of these two roads, as rational people you will conclude that very few are saved. And to mention proofs: in what age, employment or condition will you find that the number of the wicked is not a hundred times greater than that of the good, and about which one might say, "The good are so rare and the wicked are so great in number"? We could say of our times  what Salvianus said of his: it is easier to find a countless multitude of sinners immersed in all sorts of iniquities than a few innocent men. How many servants are totally honest and faithful in their duties? How many merchants are fair and equitable in their commerce; how many craftsmen exact and truthful; how many salesmen disinterested and sincere? How many men of law do not forsake equity? How many soldiers do not tread upon innocence; how many masters do not unjustly withhold the salary of those who serve them, or do not seek to dominate their inferiors? Everywhere, the good are rare and the wicked great in number. Who does not know that today there is so much libertinage among mature men, liberty among young girls, vanity among women, licentiousness in the nobility, corruption in the middle class, dissolution in the people, impudence among the poor, that one could say what David said of his times: "All alike have gone astray... there is not even one who does good, not even one." (Saint Leonard of Port Maurice,www.olrl.org/snt_docs/fewness.shtml">http://www.olrl.org/snt_docs/fewness.shtml"> The Little Numbr of Those Who Are Saved.)

These are words that should terrify each one of us. The spiritually lax and outright moral reprobates do not enter the Kingdom of God. We must pray to Our Lady every day to help us to save our souls as it is far easier to go to Hell for all eternity than it is to go to Heaven. The conciliar revolutionaries preach the exact opposite.

The standard of one’s Particular Judgment becomes higher if he has authority over others. One duly invested with the authority to govern must do so justly as he seeks to foster the common temporal good in light of man’s Last End, namely, the possession of the Beatific Vision of God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Ghost for all eternity in Heaven. Yes, woe to those who govern who do not make provision for the eternal well-being of those entrusted to their governance.

Pope Saint Pius X summarized the entirety of the duties of just governance and statecraft as he condemned the Protestant and Judeo-Masonic precept of the “separation of Church and State” in Paragraph Three of Vehementer Nos, February 11, 1906:

That the State must be separated from the Church is a thesis absolutely false, a most pernicious error. Based, as it is, on the principle that the State must not recognize any religious cult, it is in the first place guilty of a great injustice to God; for the Creator of man is also the Founder of human societies, and preserves their existence as He preserves our own. We owe Him, therefore, not only a private cult, but a public and social worship to honor Him. Besides, this thesis is an obvious negation of the supernatural order. It limits the action of the State to the pursuit of public prosperity during this life only, which is but the proximate object of political societies; and it occupies itself in no fashion (on the plea that this is foreign to it) with their ultimate object which is man's eternal happiness after this short life shall have run its course. But as the present order of things is temporary and subordinated to the conquest of man's supreme and absolute welfare, it follows that the civil power must not only place no obstacle in the way of this conquest, but must aid us in effecting it. The same thesis also upsets the order providentially established by God in the world, which demands a harmonious agreement between the two societies. Both of them, the civil and the religious society, although each exercises in its own sphere its authority over them. It follows necessarily that there are many things belonging to them in common in which both societies must have relations with one another. Remove the agreement between Church and State, and the result will be that from these common matters will spring the seeds of disputes which will become acute on both sides; it will become more difficult to see where the truth lies, and great confusion is certain to arise. Finally, this thesis inflicts great injury on society itself, for it cannot either prosper or last long when due place is not left for religion, which is the supreme rule and the sovereign mistress in all questions touching the rights and the duties of men. Hence the Roman Pontiffs have never ceased, as circumstances required, to refute and condemn the doctrine of the separation of Church and State. Our illustrious predecessor, Leo XIII, especially, has frequently and magnificently expounded Catholic teaching on the relations which should subsist between the two societies. "Between them," he says, "there must necessarily be a suitable union, which may not improperly be compared with that existing between body and soul.-"Quaedam intercedat necesse est ordinata colligatio (inter illas) quae quidem conjunctioni non immerito comparatur, per quam anima et corpus in homine copulantur." He proceeds: "Human societies cannot, without becoming criminal, act as if God did not exist or refuse to concern themselves with religion, as though it were something foreign to them, or of no purpose to them.... As for the Church, which has God Himself for its author, to exclude her from the active life of the nation, from the laws, the education of the young, the family, is to commit a great and pernicious error. -- "Civitates non possunt, citra scellus, gerere se tamquam si Deus omnino non esset, aut curam religionis velut alienam nihilque profuturam abjicere.... Ecclesiam vero, quam Deus ipse constituit, ab actione vitae excludere, a legibus, ab institutione adolescentium, a societate domestica, magnus et perniciousus est error. (Pope Saint Pius X, Vehementer Nos, February 11, 1906.)

Human societies have, sadly, become criminal because most people, including those who govern, do indeed “act as if God did not exist or refuse to concern themselves with religion.” The consequences of such disorder are deadly to men and their nations. As has been noted many times previously in this website, we are witnessing the perfection of the inherent degeneracy of the false, naturalistic, Pelagian and religiously indifferentist principles of the American founding. Disorder in the souls of men leads to disorder in one’s nation and hence in the world. No nation will ever know a just social order domestically and the world-at-large will never enjoy a genuine peace as long most men are at war with the true God of Divine Revelation, the Most Blessed Trinity, by means of unrepented sins and by enshrining grave sins as a “civil right” in public law and celebrating them throughout the nooks and crannies of “popular culture.”

As Silvio Cardinal Antoniano noted in the Sixteenth Century:

The more closely the temporal power of a nation aligns itself with the spiritual, and the more it fosters and promotes the latter, by so much the more it contributes to the conservation of the commonwealth. For it is the aim of the ecclesiastical authority by the use of spiritual means, to form good Christians in accordance with its own particular end and object; and in doing this it helps at the same time to form good citizens, and prepares them to meet their obligations as members of a civil society. This follows of necessity because in the City of God, the Holy Roman Catholic Church, a good citizen and an upright man are absolutely one and the same thing. How grave therefore is the error of those who separate things so closely united, and who think that they can produce good citizens by ways and methods other than those which make for the formation of good Christians. For, let human prudence say what it likes and reason as it pleases, it is impossible to produce true temporal peace and tranquillity by things repugnant or opposed to the peace and happiness of eternity. (Silvio Cardinal Antoniano, quoted by Pope Pius XI in Divini Illius Magistri, December 31, 1929.)

No, no one on the naturalist "right" understands this, which makes it impossible to turn back the tide of evil advance by their opposite numbers among the ranks of the naturalist "left," most of whom are proud to boast of their support for the very evils that undermine justice in their nations and peace in the world.

Pope Leo XIII, writing in Immortale Dei, November 1, 1885, taught that it is impossible to produce a just social order if the civil law permits all kinds of licentiousness:

Whatever, therefore, is opposed to virtue and truth may not rightly be brought temptingly before the eye of man, much less sanctioned by the favor and protection of the law. A well-spent life is the only way to heaven, whither all are bound, and on this account the State is acting against the laws and dictates of nature whenever it permits the license of opinion and of action to lead minds astray from truth and souls away from the practice of virtue. To exclude the Church, founded by God Himself, from life, from laws, from the education of youth, from domestic society is a grave and fatal error. A State from which religion is banished can never be well regulated; and already perhaps more than is desirable is known of the nature and tendency of the so-called civil philosophy of life and morals. The Church of Christ is the true and sole teacher of virtue and guardian of morals. She it is who preserves in their purity the principles from which duties flow, and, by setting forth most urgent reasons for virtuous life, bids us not only to turn away from wicked deeds, but even to curb all movements of the mind that are opposed to reason, even though they be not carried out in action. (Pope Leo XIII, Immortale Dei, November 1, 1885.)

As has been noted on this website so many hundreds upon hundreds of times, the world is a mess because fallen men have rejected the infallible voice of Holy Mother Church ever since Martin Luther’s revolution against the Divine Plan that God Himself instituted to effect man’s return to Him through His Catholic Church, and it has been accelerating down into the abyss these past sixty years because we have lacked the Principle of Unity represented by a true and legitimate Successor of Saint Peter. There is confusion even within sedevacantist circles because of the lack of the Universal Pastor to guide us all.

In case you have not noticed, we are in the midst of a chastisement that shows no sign of abating. Although I, for one, pray for a mitigation of this chastisement, I know that this chastisement, as terrible as it is in all of its dreadful details, is what we deserve for our lukewarmness, our worldliness, and for the general belief held by so many Catholics that politics and elections provide the key to “saving” the nation. They are not. We must first seek to save our own immortal souls by making reparation for our sins as we pray for the conversion of others to the true Faith, outside of which there is no salvation and without which there can be no true and enduring social order.

What most people alive today, including many poorly formed Catholics within the conciliar structures, do not understand is that there is no need to fear even genuine outbreaks of disease and/or the exploitation of such outbreaks by statists intent on the institutionalization of a Red Chinese-style dictatorship in partnership with Big Pharma, Big Tech, Big Ag, Big Banking, Big Show Business, Big Sports, Big Law, Big Media, Big Education, Big Everything Bad and Immoral.

Why fear disease?

The frailty of the human body is a consequence of Original Sin. Suffering is the path to Heaven, and each of us must suffer because each of us is a sinner and must repay the temporal debt that we owe God for our forgiven Mortal Sins, our Venial Sins, and any attachment we might have to our sins. Even though have walked more perfectly along the path of perfection by cooperating lovingly with the graces Our Lady has sent to them must suffer so as to be even more perfected than they have become and to help make reparation for the sins of others and to effect their conversion to the Catholic Faith if non-Catholic or their return to the Sacred Tribunal of Penance and the practice of the Holy Faith if baptized therein.

Although our civil minders and the mad scientists whom they have empowered believe that they can eradicate disease by an endless success of vaccines and the aggressive use of “comfort care” to “ease out” the diseased made sick by all manner of nutritional, mineral and vitamin deficiencies caused by Big Ag’s overly processed foods and the effects of Big Pharma’s drugs that make sick people even sicker and thus more dependent upon their products, we know that they will fail in the “Project Immorality” as no one is as foolish as those who think that they can ape the Omnipotence and Omniscience of the true God of Divine Revelation, the Most Holy Trinity.

This will sound trite because I have written this over a thousand times of this website, but I will write it again anew: there is nothing we can suffer—there  is nothing anyone can say about us, post about, write about us, gossip about us, attack us physically, nothing—that is the equal of what one of our least Venial Sins caused the Second Person of the Most Blessed Trinity made Man in Our Lady’s Virginal and Immaculate Womb by the power of the Third Person of the Most Blessed Trinity, God the Holy Ghost, at the Annunciation of Our Lady to suffer in His Sacred Humanity during His Passion and Death on the wood of the Holy Cross on Good Friday and that caused His Most Blessed Mother to suffer in perfect compassion with Him as our Co-Redemptrix.

Those who manufactured and who are continuing to exploit the so-called “pandemic” are thus helping us get home to Heaven IF we offer up the sufferings they are imposing upon and pray for their conversion.

This does not mean that we must not oppose them and try to expose them and their schemes. Of course not! One of the best ways in situations such as we face at this time to correct malefactors is oppose them vigorously and to denounce their words and actions for what they are. Doing this is a Spiritual Work of Mercy as our opposition to their lies and nefarious schemes is an effort to admonish the sinner, noting as well that we also have a civic duty to oppose such evils for the establishment of a just social order.

Alas, a just social order can only be established on the basis of the Catholic Faith—the true Catholic Faith, not the conciliar variety—if men convert, quit their sins and seek to make reparation for them. Until this happens, though, we must bear our share of hardship which the Gospel entails as we remember that this is the time that God has known from all eternity that we would be living, meaning that this is the time that He has chosen for us to be alive and to work out our salvation in fear and trembling as members of His Holy Catholic Church.

There is no ruing the fact that we are alive at this time as to lament the realities of the world in which we live to is rebel against the ineffable wisdom of the Providence of God and to cast away the graces He sends to us through the loving hands of Our Lady, she who is the Mediatrix of All Graces, with which we are meant to sanctify and save our immoral souls, which have been redeemed at so great a cost, the cost of the shedding of every single drop of Our Divine Redeemer, Christ the King, as He paid back in His own Sacred Humanity the debt of sin that was owed to Him in His Infinity as God in all the sacred events of the Paschal Triduum we will be calling to mind and celebrating liturgically during next week, the very week of weeks, Holy Week.

It is one of the most firmly established and most consoling of the truths that have been revealed to us that (apart from sin) nothing happens to us in life unless God wills it so. Wealth and poverty alike come from Him. If we fall ill, God is the cause of our illness; if we get well, our recovery is due to God. We owe our lives entirely to Him, and when death comes to put an end to life, His will be the hand that deals the blow.

But should we attribute it to God when we are unjustly persecuted? Yes, He is the only person you can charge with the wrong you suffer. He is not the cause of the sin the person commits by ill-treating you, but He is the cause of the suffering that person inflicts on you while sinning. God did not inspire your enemy with the will to harm you, but He gave him the power to do so. If you receive a wound, do not doubt but that it is God Himself who has wounded you. If all living creatures were to league themselves against you, unless the Creator wished it and joined with them and gave them the strength and means to carry out their purpose, they would never succeed. You would have no power over me if it had not been given you from above, the Savior of the world said to Pilate. We can say the same to demons and men, to the brute beasts and to whatever exists — You would not be able to disturb me or harm me as you do unless God had ordered it so. You are sent by Him, you are given the power by Him to tempt me and to make me suffer. You would have no power over me if it had not been given you from above.

If from time to time we meditated seriously on this truth of our faith it would be enough to stifle all complaint in whatever loss or misfortune we suffer. What I have the Lord gave me, it has been taken away by Him. It is not a lawsuit or a thief that has ruined you or a certain person that has slandered you; if your child dies it is not by accident or wrong treatment, but because God, to whom all belongs, has not wished you to keep it longer.  (Blessed Father Claude de la Colombiere, S.J., Trustful Surrender to Divine Providence, p. 40, as found online at: https://archive.org/stream/TrustfulSurrenderToDivineProvidence/TrustfulS...">Trustful Surrender To Divine Providence.)

Conscious of our need to make reparation for our sins, which are far more deadly than the coronavirus--or any sickness for that matter-- as the consecrated slaves of Christ the King through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary, may the Rosaries we pray each day to console the good God in this time of apostasy and betrayal help to plant a few seeds for the Triumph of the same Immaculate Heart of Mary when a true pope is restored to the Throne of Saint Peter and fulfills her Fatima Peace Plan consecrates Russia, thus ceasing the spread of the errors we see so manifest before us today, with all of the world's bishops to this very heart out of which the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus was formed and with which it beats as one.

The following prayer, which has a plenary indulgenced attached to it and is found in The Raccolta, is one that I pray every day for the restoration of all things in Christ the King:

O Christ Jesus, I acknowledge Thee to be the King of the universe: all that hat been made is created for Thee. Exercise over me all Thy sovereign rights. I hereby renew the promises of my Baptism, renouncing Satan and all his works and pomps, and I engage myself to lead henceforth a truly Christian life. And in an especial manner do I undertake to bring about the triumph of the rights of God and Thy Church, so far as me in lies. Divine Heart of Jesus, I offer Thee my poor actions to obtain the acknowledgment by every heart of Thy sacred kingly power. In such wise may the kingdom of thy peace be firmly established upon the earth. Amen. (The Raccolta: A Manual of Indulgences, Prayers and Devotions Enriched with Indulgences, approved by Pope Pius XII, May 30, 1951, and published in English by Benziger Brothers, New York, 1957, No. 272, p. 189. A plenary indulgence on the usual conditions once daily, S.P., Ap., February 21, 1923.)

May each Rosary we pray help to bring this miracle that the devil fears and for which we must be uncompromising in working to achieve as soldiers in the Army of Christ so that we will not be crushed by the weight of the errors of Russia, which are the errors of Modernity and Modernism, now and quite possibly, for all eternity.Bottom of Form

 

Our Lady of the Sorrows, pray for us.

Saint Joseph, pray for us.

Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.

Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.

Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Jude, pray for us.

Saint John the Beloved, pray for us.

Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.

Saints Caspar, Melchior, and Balthazar, pray for us.

Appendix A

Scientific Fraud and the Centers for Disease Control

Mr. Art Moore:

I'm Art Moore in Gig Harbor, Washington, here with Dr. Robert Malone, Dr. Ryan Cole. And we're here with parents and activists and lawmakers who are really concerned about this safety issue regarding the COVID vaccines. And we've talked about the CDC data that's on the VAERS database and the fact that it is in spite of accusations that it's not reliable.

It is giving us some alarming safety signals. But now we come to a blockbuster story. The New York Times has interviewed CDC officials who admit that they have data that goes beyond this VAERS data. They have granular data that is indicating how many people have been hospitalized deaths. Other data regarding the impact of these vaccines that they admit they've been hiding and hiding because they're concerned about vaccine hesitancy.

Dr. Cole, what's your reaction to that?

Dr. Ryan Cole

Well, as an ethical physician who took oaths to the human race, this is incredibly disturbing. These are the people that are entrusted to share with us the truth, to know that they're withholding safety data signals all in the name of trying to prevent a hesitancy over something experimental that's being used not only on adults, but trying to push this forward on children with no long term safety record.

We can't advance the clock and know what the long term outcomes are. We now to know that they know that there are problems and they're withholding it from the American people, that is scientific fraud.

Dr. Robert Malone

I completely concur. So I'm just going to read the title and a couple of clips from this blockbuster New York Times piece. And by the way, what I find fascinating is The New York Times is trying to normalize what has been going on at the CDC. They're trying to make it sound like it's acceptable practice. And I strongly concur with Ryan.

This meets the criteria of scientific fraud. Withholding data is scientific fraud. So reading from the title, “The CDC isn't publishing large portions of the COVID data it collects”. New York Times February 21st 2022 just an amazing title. Read that again. “CDC is not publishing large portions of the COVID data it collects.” Then there's a quote from Samuel Scarpino, managing director of the Pathogen Surveillance at the Rockefeller Foundation's Pandemic Prevention Institute. This is somebody who is deeply in the non-governmental sector, speaking on behalf basically of the scientists at the CDC that have failed to disclose this up till now. Here's what he says. Direct quote, "The CDC is a political organization as much as it is a public health organization." I mean, that is totally inconsistent with their charter. He's speaking the truth of the situation, and that's where we're at, the CDC.

He is saying the the CDC is overtly functioning as a political arm of the executive branch as opposed to serving its mandate from Congress. To protect the health and collect the information. In this, as the Centers for Disease Control and Surveillance that is their mission. This guy, Samuel Scarpino, goes on to say, “The steps that it takes to get something like this released are often well outside of the control of many of the scientists who work at the CDC”. Now think that quote through.

Basically a non-governmental spokesperson for the official public health scientific community is throwing Rochelle Walensky, the CDC director, under the bus. What he is saying, if you read think through his words is that the governmental leadership of the CDC has stifled CDC scientists and preventing them from disclosing key information to the public about the risks of the vaccine.

That is stunning.

Art Moore

Dr. Alan, you're well connected. I imagine, you know, many of these scientists, these scientists who are working with the CDC or advise or consult the CDC tell us just from your your experience and your standpoint what this really means Okay.

Dr. Robert Malone

I'm going to speculate because that's what you're asking me to do is kind of give you a sense of what I infer. I mean, right now, nobody's talking to me from inside the government for some reason -except my buddies at the DOD. And even that's a little limited. The CDC staff is a bureaucracy; the physicians and medical scientists sit underneath a political operation.

And for them, you know, this is their paycheck. They are focused on security. Otherwise they wouldn't work for the government at 80% of market rate. They often find themselves in positions where they're not able to really say what they're seeing and what they're experiencing. They're often very frustrated, in my experience, by having to operate underneath this political leadership organization.

And what we've got here is that they're not having the courage, unlike what folks like Ryan and I are doing. We're sticking our careers online. They haven't had the courage to come out and say, “No. This is not right.”

What's going on? So it appears that what they're doing is using a surrogate at the Rockefeller Foundation, an NGO, non non-governmental organization, to speak what they are observing and what they don't have the courage to speak about.

It's time, in my opinion, for the scientists and physicians of the CDC to come clean. It's way past time. But that's what seems to be happening is they have been undercover, observing these things and haven't had the courage to speak out about it. And as the narrative is crumbling, this a bunch of them apparently have gone to the press anonymously, because there's nobody cited on record here.

Multiple scientists are being quoted as sources by the New York Times, but they're all on background. You know what that means? None of them are having the courage to stick their necks out. And they're using a surrogate at the Rockefeller Foundation to to be their spokesperson.

And they got a problem because now they're work, their records, their careers are on the line because it's coming out that what we have is suppression of key public health information for political purpose and they may well have to confront legal consequences at some point in time.

Art Moore

I think I've been listening to you health care scientists over the last couple of days talk about what you're seeing. And so Dr. Cole in your lab and Dr. Malone, you have a big picture view of really horrific signs that there are many people who not only are being severely injured in these vaccines, but dying. And so I wonder, Dr. Cole, just from the standpoint of a physician, you went into this profession because you wanted to help people, and it just seemed that something horrible a scenario is is emerging that that could be beyond comprehension.

What's your sense of what's happening now?

Dr. Ryan Cole

Thank you. And that is the moral and ethical responsibility in all of this. I went into medicine to be a healer, to take care of people. And when I started seeing these signals early on, I knew right away I have one thing and one thing only to do. And that's to tell the truth, whether it's convenient or inconvenient, you have to follow the truth where it goes.

So these players within the CDC, within government agencies, if they see that signal, instead of protecting their career or being worried about what's going to happen to me if I say something, what about the human being that's going to be harmed and damaged by you not saying something? So we as physicians and scientists have one responsibility only, and that's the health and wellness of humanity, no matter the inconvenient cost of telling that truth.

So in a scenario like this, yes, in the lab I started seeing the clotting damage. Yes. I started seeing upticks in autoimmune disease. Yes, I started seeing an uptick in cancers. Did I sound the alarm? You bet I did. And what did I hear from most of my colleagues? Crickets.

Dr. Robert Malone

I'd like to amplify on that. We both come from a background of pathology. I taught pathology at the medical school level for well over a decade, and the historic role of pathologists in the medical profession is basically quality control. We're the final arbiters of truth, and it may be one of the reasons why we've been comfortable speaking out is because that is the nature of our discipline.

That is the historic nature of the role of pathology in medicine is to be the final arbiters of truth. That's what we do. That's what pathologists are about.

Dr. Ryan Cole

Yeah, we don't cause the disease. We're the reporters at the scene of the crash. And when we see the crash, we report on the crash. And very often in medicine, the first person to observe there's a difference in the pattern. And the signal here is the pathologist saying, I'm seeing something new. And then you sound the alarm and you get other colleagues to look at that same signal.

Are they seeing that signal as well?

Art Moore

"Yeah. So when I think back, what I remember is the rebuttal is, “well, you know, we don't have the studies." This is anecdotal.” bBut what you're saying is there's a process. You begin with anecdotal and then you move towards studies.

Dr. Robert Malone

And I wouldn't even say anecdotal, anecdotal as a pejorative.

Dr. Ryan Cole

I would say it's the early signal.

Dr. Robert Malone

Bingo. And when you hear about signal detection.

Dr. Ryan Cole

And worse, we detect that signal and then the signal is starting to amplify because now when we go to conferences and we talk to say, I talked to a surgical oncologist surgeon last night, he's saying he has a young gastric cancer patient, who is a 28 year old, an esophageal cancer who is 31 year old. A radiologist called me yesterday from a multi-center unit, with another 31 year old person dead - within a couple of weeks of their shots. And so when you see these unusual signals and then it gets amplified every time you get another colleague saying thank you for speaking up. “I'm seeing the same signal.” “I'm seeing the same signal.” Now you have an overwhelming amount of evidence that you can call and draw on scientifically.

Dr. Robert Malone

What happens a lot of times is the problem is pattern recognition.

Dr. Ryan Cole

Yes.

Dr. Robert Malone

And pattern recognition is really tough when you're at the tip of the spear because you have no preceding metaphor. And once somebody like Ryan speaks out and saying, says, things like, I've seen signs of these viral diseases cropping up. It's sounds and looks like immunosuppression. I'm seeing signs of unusual cancers cropping up that fits with the immunosuppression” then we're starting to build a pattern.

Okay. And then we say to our colleagues, we're observing this pattern. Are you seeing it also? And when that starts coming back, from people like oncologists and surgeons, then, then then we're starting to say this is looking a little alarming. And it's time to really dig in. What happens that I've seen is once those those ideas, that initial pattern recognition is gone out there, then other people are often able to perceive things that before they might have noticed subconsciously, but they not might not have been aware of.

And that's how medicine progresses.

Dr. Ryan Cole

Now, they may have had a subconscious blind spot, but when you realize that that pattern is clicking upward, they open their eyes and say, I am seeing that. And then the frustration is knowing that we have large data gather gathering agencies for the which we pay with our tax dollars, who say nothing. I pay, we all pay. And then public information coming out saying, oh, we've been seeing those patterns, but we feel like you don't need the whole truth because we need to hide those things.

Dr. Robert Malone

This has been what's gone on all the way through. With Tony Fauci talking about, “well, I told them that you would be reach herd immunity at 70% vaccination because “I thought that's what they could handle and then oh it's 80%”. If you run the calculations, even with Delta it was 140% vaccine coverage to get to herd immunity.

In other words you can't achieve herd immunity when you run the calculations. This is what what we've seen. And we saw this lying really early on - as “the noble lie.” That's what we've been dealing with all the way through and this is just the latest embodiment of the government feeling like the way they need to manage us is with the noble lie of spoon feeding us what they think we can accept, not giving us truth.

Art Moore

The truth is that because they went all in on the vaccines, as if there's no other way to treat this. And it's just easy. One, fix the vaccines. Is that why they're defending? And also, you know, why they're not why they're suppressing the trigger?

Dr. Robert Malone

This gets into the the dangerous territory of thinking that we can get inside of Rochelle's and Tony's head.

Dr. Ryan Cole

It's always hard to answer somebody else's “why?” I can observe data and report data, and my job in medicine is always to follow that data, whether convenient or not, the data tells the truth. If you have the full data, so when full data is being withheld, then the data becomes a partial lie.

To Dr. Malone's point saying, “well, you're not prepared for the truth or we know better.” This is paternalistic and paternalistic. “You're just little children” is really an improper way to treat patients. These agencies are saying “we let you know what truth you're allowed to have or not.” And then you get policymakers, you get governors, you get school boards, saying, well, our policy will be this based on this.

Dr. Robert Malone

You get medical licensing boards.

Dr. Ryan Cole

Coming after people like you and I.

Dr. Robert Malone

Who (medical licensing boards) are often appointed by politicos coming after us, trying to take our license because we've been speaking truth. Because as pathologists, we are trained folk who are able to pick out signal from noise. And we've done it earlier and we haven't been constrained in speaking the truth that we see. The problem is then a lot of the other docs that aren't trained in this kind of signal detection world and only hear the messaging from the government.

Pathologists apply information in science to medicine daily. We're the folks that have to give that truth to them (other doctors). So they know how to manage things clinically. But what's happened is that everybody has assumed that the CDC and the NIH are speaking truth, and as a consequence, they felt justified in attacking us for observing these signals giving these warnings.

And we've had to bear the brunt. And as opposed to our esteemed colleagues inside the government at the CDC, who have failed to disclose what they're observing, we've been the ones at the tip of the spear, taking it from the press, from our licensing boards. And now we find out that, in fact, we're being validated that what we have observed is been hidden from the regular the general community.

And that's the the key point that it bothers me here is that the CDC has a responsibility to communicate accurate information. It represents that it's doing so, and it's communicating both to the general public and to the medical community. And they are now admitting through this New York Times article, multiple sources, that they've been lying to the medical community and that is scientific fraud.

That is the definition, withholding data, scientific data, medical data - that is fraud.

Art Moore

So it sounds essentially like what the government is saying to us non-scientists is you can't handle the truth. Correct?

Dr. Robert Malone

Precisely. It couldn't be any more overt.

Dr. Ryan Cole

And with an article like this coming out, coming out now, we should invite our colleagues who aren’t seeing what they've been told to stand up and say it. They should wake up.

Dr. Robert Malone

They must.

Dr. Ryan Cole

Say it. It is an ethical responsibility to humanity to do so.

Art Moore

And you've been doing that for some time, trying to to wake up and encourage your colleagues from all across this nation.

Dr. Robert Malone

In the world.

Art Moore

And we've heard numbers like there are maybe 500 physicians in America who are awake and nobody can know for sure, but that's a handful or I just a small portion of the physicians here. Tell me, though.

Dr. Robert Malone

I think that was a Pierre Kory quote, and that was four months ago. Okay. But the numbers have been building.

Art Moore

Yeah. What are you seeing?

Dr. Robert Malone

I'm getting calls all the time. You're getting calls. People are coming out of the woodwork. They're hearing this messaging. It is not about us. We are really adamant this is not about us. It's about you and the community and our fellow physicians. But remember, that we're not just two. We represent an organization, the global COVID Summit Group that is over 17,000 physicians and medical scientists from all over the world.

We have all been speaking. But the problem is that there's a concerted effort to censor us and prevent us from speaking. You know, I've been de-platformed on LinkedIn and Twitter. There's all the blowback over the Joe Rogan podcast, a concerted effort in mainstream media. We're so grateful for the at least the conservative media has been willing to talk to us.

But on there has been a concerted effort to keep key information from physicians, scientists and the general public. And now it's out in the open.

Art Moore

And it really begins to make a lot more sense when you look at this New York Times article and just the admission of the direct connection between information and worrying that people will get the vaccine, that seems pretty simple. Yeah. Now, this is going to be a huge issue that I know you two will be talking about in the days to come.

But if we could just briefly move to another issue so back in December, Dr. Malone, you were talking about the Omicron variant. That this wave will have a silver lining. That Omicron itself could act kind of like a natural vaccine. And now just in the last few days, we hear Bill Gates is on video saying, sadly, it seems that Omicron is acting like a natural vaccine.

Dr. Robert Malone

Bill Gates has bragged about how much money he's made off of this outbreak. He made strategic investments based on his situational awareness and somehow had foreshadowing that something like this was coming and placed his financial bets. He's made a lot of money on this.

So there's this odd use of language I think is kind of a Freudian slip. It's us seeing into his mind. And, you know, what it reveals is that this gentleman has purported to be an advocate for humanity, the champion of global health, is working another agenda. Why else would he say, “sadly”, that this natural phenomena of Omnicom is acting as a natural vaccine and has virtually vaccinated the entire world to generate mucosal immunity. Exactly what I predicted. If anybody wants to fact check me, they all I got to do is look up the Laura Ingram clips from before Christmas.

Frankly I went out line on that prediction. I was a little worried that I was going a little too far. But the thing about being a professional and doing this for a living for decades is it gives you a certain amount of confidence in reading the data and as a virologist and a vaccinologist, I knew when I heard the data coming out of South Africa that this looked like it could play out in a good way. When I looked at how the virus had evolved to infect upper airways. So I said that this looked like a Christmas present.

And now we've got Bill Gates confirming it, in his own interesting way, which which reveals his own personal agenda. But I again, I really don't like to get into people's heads. I'm not a psychiatrist. Yeah, but it's a fascinating statement.

Art Moore

Yeah. Just one thing really quickly to add, I think to that a Dr. Cole, you've been talking about natural immunity and its superiority. The studies show us over vaccine immunity. So when we talk about Omicron being like a natural vaccine, that's pretty good news.

Dr. Ryan Cole

That's fantastic news. https://brownstone.org/articles/79-research-studies-affirm-naturally-acq...">Brownstone Institute has 150 articles showing how natural immunity is far superior to vaccine immunity. And we've known this for a long time. Omicron is, to Dr. Malone's point, even even more so that added blessing to humanity as this virus has changed and is our new “Funny Uncle” Variant. It is less deadly than earlier variants but spreads more readily. Natural immunity has provided that broad natural immunity. COVID recovered immunity has mucosal immunity. Now when it comes into your body, your body says, “Hey, I remember that I can fight that off.” So yeah, it's a blessing to humanity. We've been saying this for a long time. And now the data is supporting that.

Dr. Robert Malone

There is one nuance in the current data that that is a little worrisome. And I'm not comfortable that it is fully verified yet. But the signal is there and it's very worrisome to many of us.

There is data from all over the world coming direct from government databases suggesting that the risk of the current infection and disease is higher in people that have been previously vaccinated. And it's a function of the number of doses. So this gets to a whole issue of whether it makes a lot of sense to keep boosting people, because this is it.

The risk of enhanced disease and infection is still here. That is something the FDA worried about in their very first emergency use authorization documents. They told the pharmaceutical industry that they had to follow this issue and analyze whether or not it was happening. Pharma decided not to do that, even though the FDA recommended it. And the FDA didn't force them to do it.

And now we're seeing the signal. So that's the thing that I think got both of us a little bit worried is these signs exist and the concern is that we may see future variants. We have to be very vigilant right now. But this knee jerk reaction to just do more vaccination has significant risk for making things worse rather than better.

Dr. Ryan Cole

And we knew this historically with the trials of prior coronavirus vaccines, which all failed for pathologic and immunologic reasons. And we know the history of this family of viruses. So kind of to your original question, was a vaccine strategy the prudent thing to do well, in retrospect and to Dr. Malone's point that we know that more doses doesn't seem to be helping, it rather seems to be having a detrimental effect on those who have had more doses in terms of acquisition of future variants and adverse outcomes with those variants.

So our concern is from a pattern point of view that and that the CDC is hiding the data. They know that this is an issue and the point of this conversation.

Dr. Robert Malone

Well, and then there's then there's this chief immunologist in Israel, which is ground zero for rolling out the Pfizer vaccine with the extra booster. You talked about that.

Dr. Ryan Cole

This is key. Dr. Cohen, the chief immunologist of Israel, who created their vaccine roll out program. Not they have given shot after shot and booster with another booster. Dr. Cohen now says, “look we've made mistakes. We thought this was going to be better than it was with these shots. That there would be no more passports, no more boosters. It is not working.”

If you want to see where diseases going off the charts, look at where they've received a third and a fourth booster that's Israel.

So their chief immunologist is saying “stop, we have to stop.” Of course the media attacked him for saying it but he has the data and the science saying this is prudent time to stop.

Dr. Robert Malone

And if I can't know there's another buried lead in that bill Gates interview. He acknowledges that they blew it by suppressing early treatment and drug alternatives and just focusing on the vaccines. It's a fascinating interview. And that's another message that our group has been putting out through Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. Dr. Zelenko and so many other doctors - that early treatment saves lives.

And now we got Bill Gates, the champion of vaccines, acknowledging that the public health community worldwide blew it by suppressing early treatment. And by the way, one of the ways they've suppressed it is through this propaganda campaign in the press that we've seen both on hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin early treatment, They have blocked papers about early treatment in the scientific literature, and most scientific journals requiring that there be these little statements genuflecting to the efficacy of the vaccine if you want to publish anything.

But now the data is coming out anyway.

Art Moore

Is that in line with this whole idea of the vaccines or the way to do this? And if you have alternative treatments, I understand you can't get emergency use authorization because that's one of the criteria.

Dr. Robert Malone

There is that. The problem with that argument is that I tested that directly with the CDC and asked them to get back to me. And they did. And basically, they said yeah, that's the way the law reads. But they said to me directly, they don't care they're going to do whatever they want to do. They disregarded the actual language of the emergency use authorization.

So they didn't really see that as an obstacle. That gets to this whole point of what is functionally under this emergency declaration that has just been reactivated by the Biden administration. They're able to suspend law. At least they believe that they are. They believe that they're able to circumvent the Constitution and the statutes enacted by Congress, including the bioethics statutes that we call the common rule.

That has been one of the things that's upset me the most all the way through this is the government is acting in a lawless fashion, and they believe they have the right to do it because of this emergency declaration, which in our opinion is no longer valid. There is no medical emergency here. So if there's any emergency, it's that the truckers are rolling on DC that's what's got them really worried.

Dr. Ryan Cole

There is no medical emergency now that Omicron is here, acting as a blessing for humanity. We know we have early treatments. We know how to stop the disease and treat the disease. So to declare that there's a medical emergency is pure governmental fraud. We as physicians and tens of thousands of physicians know that this no that that declaration of emergency is fraudulent.

So they are violating constitutional principles and the law. We know the CDC is lying to us. Now, who else was lying to us? This is the frustration in all of this, is that we are the scientists. We see the disease. We know what's happening. The truth needs to be told that there is no emergency. The emergency powers need to end yesterday.

And we support those who use their constitutional rights to protest for freedom. We are all truckers now.

Dr. Robert Malone

Well put. (https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/scientific-fraud-and-the-cdc?token=eyJ...">Scientific Fraud and the CDC - by Robert W Malone MD, MS.)

Appendix B

  • During a February 4, 2022, interview with Time magazine, former National Institutes of Health director Francis Collins blamed me for the government’s inability to bring the COVID pandemic to a close
  • Collins also, in apparent confusion, misidentified me as the inventor of the mRNA vaccine
  • It seems Collins is desperately trying to deflect from the NIH’s involvement in the pandemic. From the start, Collins denied the possibility of a lab leak, even though most of the evidence pointed straight in that direction
  • Collins has also denied that the NIH funded risky gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, despite documented evidence of such funding
  • For now, Collins appears to be protected by political powers, including the Department of Homeland Security, which recently labeled free speech as domestic terrorism and criminalized truth telling. According to the DHS, people who “undermine public trust in government institutions” are the primary “threat actors”

During a February 4, 2022, interview with Time magazine,1 former National Institutes of Health director Francis Collins accused me of being to blame for the government’s inability to bring the COVID pandemic to a close.

In his mind, the COVID-19 deaths experienced in the U.S. were not due to the lack of appropriate treatment but, rather, our failure to get a needle into every arm in America. In other words, vaccine resistance is the reason COVID-19 is still with us, and people who share basic facts about the COVID jabs are to blame for that.

Time’s editor-at-large Belinda Luscombe asked Collins why so many of those who distrust vaccines are Christians, to which he replied, in part:

“I don’t want to blame any of those people who have been somehow seduced by misinformation into a position that is not good for them. I want to blame the people who are spreading the misinformation especially those who know it’s not true and are doing so anyway ...

I look at what happens in social media, at the top 12 distributors of false information on Facebook. And some of them are doctors who are making a lot of money on this.

They’re the people who I have the hardest time forgiving, physicians who have given an oath to do no harm and are now saying ‘These vaccines are dangerous,’ and ‘Here is an alternative approach and that if you buy from me, you’ll be fine.’ Look at Dr. Joseph Mercola from Florida.”

Before correcting the article, Luscombe interjected at this point, asking, “The one who claims to be the inventor of mRNA?” to which Collins replied, “Yes.” In the corrected copy, Collins reply is changed to, “No that’s Dr. Robert Malone ...”

But originally, both of them somehow managed to get the two of us confused. I guess it’s hard to keep all the facts straight when you’re trying to cover up lies with more lies.

Evidence Does Not Support Collins’ Denials

To me, it seems Collins is desperately trying to deflect and hide the NIH’s own involvement in the pandemic — both its creation and its continuation — which is getting more obvious as time goes on. From the start, Collins2 and Fauci denied the possibility of a lab leak, even though most of the evidence pointed straight in that direction.

In January 2022, House Oversight Committee Republicans released National Institutes of Health emails that show Drs. Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins led the effort to bury the lab leak theory, even though the scientific consensus in early February 2020 was that the virus likely leaked from the Wuhan lab.3 For example, a note from professor and microbiologist Robert (Bob) Garry, Ph.D., read:

“Before I left the office for the ball, I aligned the nCoV with the 96% bat CoV sequenced at WIV. Except for the RBD the S proteins are essential identical at the amino acid level — well all but the perfect insertion of 12 nucleotides that adds [sic] the furin site.

S2 is over its whole length essentially identical. I really can’t think of a plausible natural scenario where you get from the bat virus or one very similar to it to nCoV where you insert exactly 4 amino acids 12 nucleotide [sic] that all have to be added at the exact same time to gain this function — that and you don’t change any other amino acids in S2?

I just can’t figure out how this gets accomplished in nature. Do the alignment of the spikes at the amino acid level — its [sic] stunning. Of course, in the lab it would be easy to generate the perfect 12 base insert that you wanted.”

That was a private note; yet, publicly — and in retrospect, duplicitously — Garry was claiming it came from nature, and even cowrote a paper in March 20204 stating that, “plausibly,” the virus could not have come from a lab. A year later, in May 2021, in a video interview with the American Society for Microbiology,5 he again insisted the virus came from nature and not a lab.

One can only speculate why he had one story for Fauci’s eyes only, but another for the public. Then, again, Collins and Fauci also denied ever having funded gain-of-function (GOF) research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in China, despite documented evidence of such funding.6,7,8,9

As reported by The Federalist,10 while Fauci insists that the NIAID’s funding of research on bat coronaviruses at the WIV (through grants to the EcoHealth Alliance) could not possibly have led to the creation of SARS-CoV-2, the records that could actually prove this assertion — the complete lab records — have never been disclosed. Why is that?

It’s also worth noting that the natural origin theory does not automatically dismiss the lab leak theory. Even if SARS-CoV-2 had a natural origin, it still could have escaped from the Wuhan lab — if it was kept and/or studied there.

So, why are Fauci and Collins so adamant about denying both scenarios? And why are they not cooperating and releasing relevant information if that information can clear them of suspicions of wrongdoing?

Criminalizing Truth

For the time being, Collins and his underling, director of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Dr. Anthony Fauci, are protected by political powers, but that could — and hopefully will — eventually change. For now, they’re relying on a combination of projection, censorship and intimidation to keep the truth under a tight lid.

According to the DHS, Americans who ‘undermine public trust in government institutions’ are the primary ‘threat actors.’ With that, they have literally labeled free speech a ‘terrorism threat’ to the U.S.

To that end, February 7, 2022, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) raised the terrorism threat level a notch:11

“The United States remains in a heightened threat environment fueled by several factors, including an online environment filled with false or misleading narratives and conspiracy theories, and other forms of mis-, dis- and mal-information (MDM12) introduced and/or amplified by foreign and domestic threat actors.”

According to the DHS, Americans who “undermine public trust in government institutions” are the primary “threat actors.” With that, they have literally labeled free speech a “terrorism threat” to the U.S.13

Anyone who presents information that results in people losing confidence in government institutions is “a terrorist.” The problem with this is that it’s THE TRUTH that is triggering this loss of confidence. So, they’re actually criminalizing truth telling!

National Security Apparatus Targets Citizens

DHS claims that “domestic violent extremists” have and may continue to use COVID measures, such as mask and vaccine mandates, “to justify violence” against “government, health care and academic institutions that they associate with those measures.”

Strangely enough, the DHS then goes on to cite threats directed at synagogues, mosques, Jewish facilities and Black colleges, as well as rumors of election fraud, as examples of events that can inspire and mobilize this kind of violence. Just what race, religion and election fraud concerns have to do with how people feel about COVID measures is unclear.

To keep Americans safe, the DHS urges everyone to maintain the “digital and media literacy” required to “recognize and build resilience to false or misleading narratives.”

For their part, the DHS and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) are sharing information with partners “across every level of government and in the private sector.” They’ve also established a “new, dedicated domestic terrorism branch to produce the sound, timely intelligence needed to counter related threats.”14

In the same vein, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has a dedicated “MDM team,” a special taskforce “charged with building national resilience to mis-, dis-, and malinformation ...”15 In short, national security agencies are being weaponized against the American public itself. They’re openly being used to shut down Constitutional rights.

DHS Bulletin Cannot Be Allowed to Stand

In response to the DHS bulletin, Malone writes:16

“In the United States, our right to free speech and the right to assemble is paramount to who we are. [The DHS National Terrorism Advisory Bulletin] has some of my colleagues as well as myself very worried. Those who are writing and speaking about science and health policy are now in danger of being targeted by the U.S. government as domestic terrorists for spreading ‘mis-, dis- and mal-information (MDM).

The manipulative linking of election violence to COVID-19 policies is disingenuous. It is a calculated strategy to allow government authorities to crack down on those people who are going against the Health and Human Services narrative that there are no early treatments for COVID-19 and that everyone must get vaccinated, and that the lockdowns and mask mandates were necessary.

The U.S. government must be held accountable for their failed policies and authoritarian behavior during this pandemic. Scientists, the press, physicians and yes, laypeople, must be able to speak and write freely ...

As a people, we cannot allow ourselves to be censored in this manner. It is time that our legislative and judicial branches of government do their job to protect our first amendment rights. This bulletin cannot be allowed to stand or we will no longer have freedom of speech in this country.” (https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/02/17/covid-cri..." target="_blank">Covid Criminal Network.)

Appendix C

The Blood of the Vaccinated

I recently met with a functional medicine doctor. Among other things, functional medicine doctors have been known to use darkfield microscopes and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_blood_analysis">live blood analysis which is shunned by the mainstream medical community as quackery.

OK, now that we’ve gotten that out of the way, let’s get to what the slides show.

First off, using a microscope to look at blood is not an unreasonable thing to do. Using a darkfield microscope just provides additional contrast.

In my case, the doctor took a blood sample from me, put it on a glass slide, and covered it with a glass cover. We weren’t in his office so the sample dried out before he looked at it, but he said what he saw was consistent with what he’s observed in every COVID vaccinated patient he’s looked at.

Here is the first image he sent.

What’s odd are what I’m calling the “land masses.”

Note the two large “land masses” in the photo. These “land masses” (my terminology not his) are what he says he only sees in vaccinated patients. The circles are red blood cells and the “spikes” are just because they are flattened and dehydrated (since hours passed from the time he took the sample).

Here’s another slide of my blood. The lower left part (to the left of the dark diagonal “line”) is just an air bubble).

Again, we see a strange “land mass” here just above the line and below the blood cells. That is the area of concern.

Whatever this is, it’s unusual.

What’s troubling is that I was vaccinated 1 year ago and my blood is still easily distinguishable as “vaccinated” blood.

I talked to Ryan Cole and he’s not sure what it is either, but thinks that it is important to find out.

Does anyone think they know and can confirm it?

The last part is the most important.

The graphene oxide hypothesis

There are people who think the sheets are graphene oxide, but they haven’t proved it.

Some people think you can do the identification using mass spectroscopy, but other experts say that graphene oxide is just carbon, oxygen, and hydrogen so it isn’t going to be easily detectable.

However, there are clever ways we can look for graphene oxide in the vials themselves but we don’t have vials to examine.

Personally, I don’t have a horse in this race. There are a lot of people who think it is graphene oxide and others who think it is something else.

Reader comments

There are a variety of opinions from readers. Some are certain these structure appeared before the COVID vaccines and are nothing to worry about. Others are confident they weren’t.

For example, https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/the-blood-of-covid-vaccinated-people/...">Phil Walsh writes:

I worked for a few decades as a microscopist and tissue culture specialist and examined my own blood quite often with the use of very high quality research scopes. Large blood inclusions like this just weren't seen pre-COVID. My best guess is that these are, indeed, atom-thick layers of graphene oxide/hydroxide which will easily fold multiple times into one "land mass" structure. I believe the reason for keeping the vials at such low temperatures before use is because the tiny nanometer-sized graphene flakes will begin to self-aggregate into larger and larger hexagonal honeycomb-like sheets at room temperature and above. This would explain the micro-coagulation at the delicate capillary vessels, with the concomitant rise in troponin levels in vaccinated people. I'd suggest repeating the blood examination and viewing immediately before desiccation occurs. You also might want to bring a magnet close to the slide to see if any movement can be detected. From the literature, it seems that GO has interesting paramagnetic properties. As for the purpose of the GO, I can only speculate that these sheets can form the substrate for the construction of nano-level biocircuits/sensors for tracking/control/etc. The state-of-art of this type of tech is thoroughly mind-blowing. Accessible information in the public sector is alarming enough. What DARPA and other entities have come up with over many decades is probably beyond what any of us can even imagine.

Vials analysis done by others

These analyses reveal self-assembling structures and hypothesize about graphene oxide:

www.algora.com/Algora_blog/2021/10/25/dr-carrie-madej-took-a-look-at-the...">https://www.algora.com/Algora_blog/2021/10/25/dr-carrie-madej-took-a-loo...">Dr. Carrie Madej

https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/nz-scientist-examines-pfizer-jab-under...">Dr Robin Wakeling

We can resolve the debate if I can get a vial of the vaccine to test

If someone can get me a vial of vaccine we can test, we can end the debate. Nobody seems to want to do that. I wonder why?

The most reasonable assumption is because they are afraid of what we might find. Which makes it all the more important to get at least one vial to examine.

Others have gotten vials to look at, but the analysis I want to do will be quite different and hopefully more revealing. (https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/the-blood-of-covid-vaccinated-people?s=r">The Blood of the Covid Vaccinated.)

Appendix D

The Origins of the Coronavirus and Omnicron

For the past two years, I and many others have detailed the ways in which COVID-19 deaths

When Omicron emerged, many scientists were bowled over by the lightning speed with which it spread. Although public health officials had warned that the original Covid-19 was highly contagious and fast-moving— it looked like it was standing still next to the Omicron variant.

Now, some scientists examining the virus have concluded “vast” genetic mutations that likely occurred in a lab setting are what makes Omicron spread so quickly.

Omicron was first detected in Botswana, South Africa, https://tass.com/world/1370605?utm_source=google.com&utm_medium=organic&...">reported to have been brought by a foreign delegation from a country officials will not identify, making it more difficult for outside observers to track its origin.

To many scientists, the genetic differences that made Omicron so quickly transmissible caused it to immediately stand out as unlikely to be a result of a natural evolution. Some note the “rapid accumulation of mutations in the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant that enabled its outbreak.”

“There was a large number of mutations in this variant—many more than we would expect from the normal evolution of this virus,” said https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2021/the-omicron-variant-of-covid-19-a-qa-w...">virologist Andrew Pekosz, Professor of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology at the Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health. “Importantly, many mutations occurred in the spike protein—the protein the virus uses to bind to and enter cells—which is the target of the vaccine.”

“It did not follow the trajectory of the outbreak,” says a researcher studying the virus for the US government who did not wish to be identified because he is not authorized to speak publicly on the topic. “One of the hypotheses is that there's been a cryptic, a completely separate outbreak going on,” or a “cryptic transmission” independent of mice. “Perhaps someone immune-compromised was infected, and active replication of the virus was maintained for a very long time.

But there is another disturbing theory— one considered more likely by some scientists working on the issue: that Omicron was bred in a lab and escaped.

It is possible “that serial passaging in mice was done in a laboratory somewhere, and add[ed] an accidental or on purpose release on the back end,” says a scientist with knowledge of the matter. “The short version is that the least likely scenario is that this was a natural human transmission chain that created the lineage and we just failed to detect it. The number and makeup of the changes would have required a vast number of infections to support.”

But how?

With Covid so prevalent, the statistical chances of a lab release are exponentially higher than they were in 2019. In the words of one scientist, “Every lab in the world is now working on Covid. It’s highly contagious and risky even with the best conrtrols. The odds of an accidental release are pretty high.”

“It's very hard to attribute where these things occur, but this is an unprecedented time we're living in,” he says, “where there are a lot of lab facilities working on the virus at the same time. And so at any point, we have safety controls to try to keep the pathogens in the lab. But with so many people working under different conditions, different restrictions, different rules, the potential for lab release of some COVID related work is plausible. It's something we need to consider.”

If Omicron came from a lab, there is the possibility of a nefarious or an accidental release. Further lab releases of genetically-altered versions of Covid, say some, are not only possible but likely.

"Suspicious features"

One scientist tells me the features that seem to set Omicron apart from a natural virus evolution include “acquiring genetic features that didn't exist or don't have a precedent historically, suddenly appear in a very short timeframe” and “a change in the amount or the acquisition of change in a virus beyond what the expectation is.” 

Scientists have identified no fewer than “45 point mutations that Omicron acquired since divergence from the B.1.1 lineage.” The mutations represent what some consider to be an implausibly high number of changes for natural evolution that has resulted in Omicron’s greater transmissibility. 

Another suspicous feature of Omicron, according to multiple scientists, is its apparent mouse origin. 

The fact is, Chinese and American scientists who had partnered up on research for years prior to the pandemic, had found it exceedingly difficult to get the bat coronavirus they were studying to infect lab mice. So the researchers were, in essence, altering lab mice to give them human cells and attributes to get them to catch a genetically-manipulated version of Covid so that they could try to invent vaccines and treatments for it. 

“The original virus had difficulties establishing infections in mice, and for laboratory use we had to have ACE2 transgenic mice [also known as] humanized mice that expressed the human ACE2 receptor,” says a scientist.

In other words, experts say rodents aren’t known to naturally catch and transmit Covid-19, so if Omicron came from a mouse host, it likely happened in an experimental lab.

The www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.14.472632v1">https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.14.472632v1">Chinese are reporting much the same. And although US scientists take research by communist Chinese scientists with a grain of salt, the fact that they’ve appeared to reach a similar conclusion bolsters the case.

In a scientific https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34954396/">paper www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1673852721003738?via=ihub">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1673852721003738?via=...">entitled: “Evidence for a mouse origin of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant,” authors Changshuo Wei, Ke-Jia Shan, Weiguang Wang, Shuya Zhang, and Qing Huan say the evidence indicates (progenitor of Omicron) jumped from humans to mice, where it somehow “rapidly accumulated mutations conductive to” [quick infection], “then jumped back into humans.”

“We found that the Omicron spike protein sequence was subjected to stronger positive selection than that of any reported SARS-CoV-2 variants known to evolve persistently in human hosts,” reports the analysis. “The number and frequency of mutations “was significantly different from the spectrum for viruses that evolved in human patients.” 

“The molecular spectrum (i.e., the relative frequency of the twelve types of base substitutions) of mutations acquired by the progenitor of Omicron was significantly different from the spectrum for viruses that evolved in human patients, but was highly consistent with spectra associated with evolution in a mouse:

  • The molecular spectrum of pre-outbreak Omicron mutations is inconsistent with an evolutionary history in humans
  • The molecular spectrum of pre-outbreak Omicron mutations is consistent with an evolutionary history in mice
  • Human SARS-CoV-2 variants reported to date could not provide a backbone for Omicron. 

Translated, experts say, a lab experimenting on human Covid in mice could have produced the incredibly more infectious Omicron, and it somehow made it into the general population.

“Natural origin is the least likely scenario,” says one governent scientist who is studying Omicron.

Second lab release?

If Omicron came from a lab, it could be the second such release.

As I’ve https://sharylattkisson.com/2021/06/covid-19-origins-the-wuhan-lab-us-fu...">previously www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2021/04/27/sharyl_attkisson_investigates...">https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2021/04/27/sharyl_attkisson_inve...">reported, many scientists around the world who studied Covid-19 from the start have said they found hallmarks of man’s manipulation, pointing strongly to a lab origin.

With the Chinese uncooperative in investigations after the pandemic, and with no public accountability among or investigation of the U.S. reserachers, including Dr. Anthony Fauci, who funded with taxpayer money or participated in the research with the communist Chinese scientists, it remains unprovable as to whether Covid-19 was cooked up in the Wuhan, China research lab. The Chinese never allowed in US or other inspectors access to the lab and documentation that would have been needed to learn the truth, even though the US helped support, inspect and bolster the lab, and partnered with scientists from the lab on controvresial and dangerous gain of function research using taxpayer dollars.

In the U.S., the group that watches for the possibility of a nefarious source turning an easily-accessible sample of Covid-19 into a bioweapon are the experts at the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) at Ft. Detrick, Maryland.

Major Jeffrey Kugelman is Division Chief of Molecular Biology there. As to whether they’ve detected anything suspicious, so far, Kugelman told me, “There's an ongoing discussion about Omicron and we don't have enough evidence to say, but it did not follow the trajectory of the outbreak.” 

“We’re still looking into why Omicron is so different,” says Kugelman, “but it is quite different than we were expecting.”  (https://sharylattkisson.com/2022/03/exclusive-experts-omicron-covid-19-l...">Experts Say Omnicron Likely Came from a Laboratory Too.)

Appendix E

Edward Pentin’s Interview with Dr. Peter McCullough

A leading authority on COVID-19 has called on the Vatican to immediately drop its vaccine advocacy and mandates, warning that its position on the jabs makes it complicit in vaccine deaths and in violation of a critical code of bioethics.

Dr Peter McCullough, a Dallas-based internist, cardiologist, and epidemiologist who has 54 peer-reviewed publications on COVID-19 to his name and has www.hsgac.senate.gov/hearings/early-outpatient-treatment-an-essential-pa...">https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/hearings/early-outpatient-treatment-an-esse...">testified in front of the U.S. Senate on the pandemic response, has also called on the Vatican to “immediately start a public interest campaign on vaccine injuries and vaccine deaths.”

Speaking over the phone on Feb. 11, the Feast of Our Lady of Lourdes, he said he believes the Vatican will already “have to account for potentially hundreds of thousands of lives lost due to the vaccine worldwide” because it has violated the www.ushmm.org/information/exhibitions/online-exhibitions/special-focus/d...">https://www.ushmm.org/information/exhibitions/online-exhibitions/special...">Nuremberg Code — a set of ethical principles that rule out any pressure, coercion or threat of reprisal for any medical treatment, especially if it’s new and experimental.

The American specialist has offered to advise the Pope on the vaccines in the future.

A Methodist, McCullough said he has felt compelled to speak up as he sees the loss of life from the vaccines and their adverse effects as unacceptable and those who fail to resist as complicit in a crime. “I cannot stand by and watch this happen without speaking out,” he said. “I do not see how any Christian can.”

Despite the Vatican www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_...">https://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con...">teaching that vaccination “is not, as a rule, a moral obligation and that, therefore, it must be voluntary,” it now mandates all employees and visitors — except for those attending liturgies and papal audiences — to be fully vaccinated or have recently recovered from the virus in order to enter Vatican territory.

Pope Francis has also been a leading global advocate of the COVID-19 vaccines, calling vaccination “www.vaticannews.va/en/pope/news/2021-08/pope-francis-appeal-covid-19-vac...">https://www.vaticannews.va/en/pope/news/2021-08/pope-francis-appeal-covi...">an act of love” and a “www.voanews.com/a/pope-francis-calls-covid-19-vaccination-moral-obligati...">https://www.voanews.com/a/pope-francis-calls-covid-19-vaccination-moral-...">moral obligation” and www.reuters.com/article/us-pope-diplomats-idAFKBN2JK0XH">https://www.reuters.com/article/us-pope-diplomats-idAFKBN2JK0XH">frequently urging equitable vaccine distribution worldwide, especially to the world’s poorest. Last year, he held two www.ncregister.com/blog/pfizer-and-the-vatican">https://www.ncregister.com/blog/pfizer-and-the-vatican">secret meetings with Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, which has a contract with the Vatican to distribute its COVID-19 vaccine.

Francis’ support for the vaccines has also been used to reject religious exemptions, most recently in a Supreme Court www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-wont-block-vaccine-...">https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-wont-block-...">decision last Friday that upheld vaccine mandates for public school teachers in New York City.

Here below is the full interview: 

Dr McCullough, as an www.americaoutloud.com/the-mccullough-report/">https://www.americaoutloud.com/the-mccullough-report/">expert internist, cardiologist, and epidemiologist, you have examined closely the cardiovascular complications of both the viral infection and the injuries developing after the COVID-19 vaccine. You have also produced 54 peer-reviewed publications on COVID-19. As someone therefore eminently qualified in this area, please could you briefly summarise what your concerns are regarding the vaccines, and the mRNA vaccines in particular?

The vaccines are now known to have a dangerous mechanism of action. That means that unlike other vaccines that are safe and effective, these vaccines, based on their biochemical and physiochemical properties, are expected to be dangerous. And what I mean by that is they are forms of genetic material, either messenger RNA, or adenoviral DNA, that are loaded onto lipid nanoparticles.

Lipid nanoparticles, by design, go to places in the body, go to organ systems in the body, where it would be deleterious to have genetic material delivered. So this is known, and it was known before the advent of these vaccines.

Papers from China studied lipid nanoparticles and it was known that they would go to the adrenal glands, they would go to the human ovaries, go to the brain, the heart, the bone marrow, other vital organs. We have great concern about any vaccine that leaves the arm after the shot and circulates through the body like that, and actually deposits genetic material into cells in the body. Having genetic material delivered into these organs is extremely concerning, also because that genetic material is then taken up by these cells. These cells are not supposed to have that genetic material. The cells have the God-given genetic endowment that’s passed down from generation to generation to generation. We don’t take some exogenous genetic material and then sprinkle it through the body and have a mosaic of cells start to produce a new substance that the human body has never produced before. This is extremely disturbing.

And then there is now the discovery that this genetic material doesn’t go away quickly. Dr. Tony Kyriakopoulos and I recently published a paper on the theoretical concerns, which is in the National Library of Medicine, that [shows] the genetic material of these vaccines could last in the body several months. Now it’s been proven that several months later the genetic material is found in the lymph nodes, so it’s still there.

The genetic material codes for a very dangerous protein are called the Wuhan wild-type spike protein which are the spines on the surface of the virus. These spike proteins confer all the danger of COVID-19. They confer all the lethality of COVID-19. So in a sense, we’ve taken the lethal component of the virus, then we’ve found the genetic code for this, and now we’re injecting the genetic code into human bodies on a mass scale. This spike protein is produced by the body in an uncontrolled fashion for an uncontrolled quantity and duration of time. What’s cohesive with the recent discovery that the genetic materials in the body for months, is that the spike protein is present in the body for months. In fact, the spike protein may be present in the body for over a year.

So what is the order of magnitude of risk, do you think, getting, say myocarditis and strokes and heart attacks from these vaccines? Are these really serious risks and could they become commonplace place because of the vaccine?

Let’s take death as the most serious concern. We’ll use the US, which has 330 million residents, as an example. If we look at all the vaccines combined per year in the United States, across all the multiple injections — and I personally have taken all the vaccines — it’s about 278 million shots per year. That’s a lot. It’s not everybody in the country, but it’s 278 million shots administered to at least a broad group of people.

The number of deaths that would be considered rare, and that we just have to live with, that can happen due to very unusual circumstances, like an allergic reaction, would be about 150 per year. So our Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) per year records about 150 deaths through all the years up to 2021.

What happened in 2021 is that by January 22 we had already hit 182 deaths — we were already 30 deaths too many. And looking back on it, if we would’ve had a proper data safety monitoring board and proper human ethics committees in place looking at this, we would’ve stopped the US program in February and said, “Listen, there’s too many deaths.”

Now, as we sit here today, we’re at over https://edwardpentin.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/VAERS-Data-COVID-1...">21,000 deaths in the same system. So I’m telling you, rare would be 150 for all the vaccines combined, and per product 50. So typically for a drug, if there’s five unexplained deaths within 30 days, it’s a black box warning [the FDA’s most stringent warning for drugs on the market, alerting the public and health care providers to serious side effects, such as injury or death]. If there are 50 deaths within 30 days, irrespective of causality — because we can never really assess causality, just if it happens temporally — if we get to 50 deaths, the product’s off the market.

As we sit here today, we are at 21,000 deaths in our CDC vaccine safety reporting system. So I am telling you, death under no circumstances can be considered rare. Now, the correct way to describe this is that this is the most dangerous and lethal biological product ever used in human history — period.

The after-effects of COVID-19 are often said to affect the heart and in some cases lead to a heart attack. Can we be sure that these deaths are caused by the vaccine, and not by the after-effects of suffering from COVID?

You know, hopefully people who have had COVID haven’t taken the vaccine. The FDA excluded those people from the trials since they had some modicum of immunity. So it’s reasonable to assume that these deaths are people who are trying to protect themselves against COVID and they took these vaccines with the intent of trying to protect themselves.

The exercise that we go through to understand whether the vaccine really caused it is called the Bradford Hill Tenets of Causality. It’s an epidemiologic analysis and I’m a trained epidemiologist. I do this work so I’m very familiar with it.

The first criteria is, is there a dangerous mechanism of action? Is it really conceivable that someone could take up too much genetic material in the wrong location and have it be lethal? Well, I’ve already reviewed that. Absolutely. This is the most dangerous mechanism we’ve actually ever seen.

Number two, is it a large signal? Yes. 21,000 deaths, that’s more deaths than have ever happened in US human history with any product. This is the largest signum we’ve ever seen.

Number three: Is it temporally related to getting the vaccine [the effect has to occur after the cause]. Well, there are two analyses, one by [Jessica] https://edwardpentin.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Rose-J-Sci-Pub-Pol...">Rose and the other by [Scott] https://edwardpentin.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/McLachlan-86-Pct-V...">McLachlan, and then there’s CDC data, which is released every week in the open VAERS system. They all agree that 50% of the deaths occur within 48 hours, 80% of deaths occur within a week. So it’s very tightly temporally related.

The next criteria, number four, is it internally consistent? Are there other events that are potentially fatal near misses that occur that are recorded in the system? The answer is yes. There’s been hundreds of thousands of ER visits, hundreds of thousands of severe allergic reactions, over 30,000 cases of heart injury, a large number of cases of heart attacks, strokes, blood clots, because the spread protein causes blood clotting. So the answer is yes, it’s all internally consistent within the same system with non-fatal events.

Now the fifth criteria is whether it is externally consistent, meaning is it seen anywhere outside the United States? So yes, it’s seen https://yellowcard.mhra.gov.uk/">in the yellow card [vaccine adverse effect reporting] system in the UK. The same exact pattern is seen. It’s also the same pattern seen in the www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/research-development/pharmacovigil...">https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/research-development/pharm...">EUDRA [vaccine adverse effect reporting] system in EU. So that meets criteria 5 and 6.

Then the final criteria would be if you do a randomized trial and you just randomize people to the placebo [a substance that has no therapeutic effect used as a control in testing new drugs] or the active product. What do you see? The answer is that with the Pfizer program, where we have enough extension data, there are more deaths with the Pfizer vaccine than there are with the placebo from the clinical trials. And if you extrapolate that out, it’s consistent.

So we have fulfilled the Bradford Hill Tenets of Causality, and therefore I’m telling you beyond a shadow of doubt that the vaccines are causing loss of human life and it’s not rare. And so because of this, the entire world is protesting these vaccines and you see these protests all over the world. No one wants to take these vaccines. Now they’re being mandated. People are fearful they’re going to lose their lives with the vaccine. So this is about human survival.

Things brings me to my next question, which is we now have www.informedchoiceaustralia.com/post/1000-peer-reviewed-studies-question...">https://www.informedchoiceaustralia.com/post/1000-peer-reviewed-studies-...">1000 peer reviewed studies questioning Covid-19 vaccine safety and in some countries, such as the United Kingdom, government data appears also to https://edwardpentin.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/photo_2022-02-10_1...">show the negative efficacy of vaccines. And yet the UK authorities and other governments continue to push ahead with vaccination programs and enforce mandates, which in some cases are very stringent, such as in the www.ncregister.com/news/vatican-s-covid-mandate-part-2-december-decree-r...">https://www.ncregister.com/news/vatican-s-covid-mandate-part-2-december-...">Vatican, www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60155635">https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60155635">Austria, www.politico.eu/article/italy-coronavirus-vaccine-mandatory-over-50-omic...">https://www.politico.eu/article/italy-coronavirus-vaccine-mandatory-over...">Italy, www.france24.com/en/europe/20220121-weekly-protests-against-mandatory-va...">https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20220121-weekly-protests-against-mand...">Germany, and https://healthpolicy-watch.news/france-vaccine-pass-law-covid-19-eu-fine/">France. Is there an alternative interpretation of the data which explains this course of action? Are they reading some other data perhaps to come to these policy decisions?

If they are, they don’t present it. I mean, one of the things that’s difficult in the scientific community to accept is that the authorities that are advocating the vaccines provide no justification for them. They don’t justify, they don’t, they don’t prove to the public that they’re safe or effective.

And also there’s an absence of clinical trials?

Right. Their clinical trials have not been updated. So the vaccines continue to mutate, and they continue to use the same products. So all the products were keyed against the original Wuhan strain, the wild-type strain. Now it’s mutated so dramatically that all the studies suggest the vaccines have lost control. So we have two good reports from the United States: first from the CDC, www.cdc.gov/library/covid19/12102021_covidupdate.html">https://www.cdc.gov/library/covid19/12102021_covidupdate.html">on December 10, and then the www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.01.11.22269045v1">https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.01.11.22269045v1">second one from [Dr. Joseph] Lewnard et al done at the University of California Berkeley School of Public Health in January of this year, showing over 70% of Americans hospitalized with the omicron variant are fully vaccinated, which is rare, but it can happen,. And that’s consistent with the data in the UK, Denmark, Germany, South Africa, and Israel. The majority of people hospitalized with COVID-19 [in countries] with good data systems are fully vaccinated. It should become relatively self-apparent that the vaccines don’t stop hospitalization, and they don’t differentially provide new benefits. We conclude the opposite: those who did not take the vaccines are doing much better.

Why is it, though, that so much of the mainstream media and the vast majority of doctors and clinicians seem to take a very different view to yours? They still promote these vaccines and dismiss you, https://substack.com/profile/49176289-robert-w-malone-md-ms">Dr. Robert Malone and others as giving out https://eu.examiner-enterprise.com/story/news/2021/10/06/doctor-fired-ba...">misinformation. How can the average person with no expertise in this area be sure what the truth is when this is the sort of state of affairs that we’re in?

Those who are advocating the vaccines do not give any support for their safety or efficacy, doctors included. So that is the problem. The public must demand that they justify what they’re telling the public, just like I have to justify. That’s the reason why I went through the Bradford Hill Criteria with you. What the public is not getting is fair, scientific information, and the public can see this. That’s the reason why the public is protesting. The public has actually decided who to believe, and they’re not believing the government authorities and the large body of doctors. It’s obvious.

The Food and Drug Administration is partly funded by user fees from companies, many of them pharmaceutical companies, by as https://theconversation.com/why-is-the-fda-funded-in-part-by-the-compani...">much as 45%. Is this part of the problem?

I don’t know. The pharmaceutical funding is part of it, but these struggles are occurring anyway, independent of pharmaceutical funding. They’re occurring in all parts of the world and it doesn’t have to do with Pfizer and Moderna. It doesn’t even have to do with these genetic vaccines. In some parts of the world it’s the Coronavac vaccine from Sinovac which is the Chinese vaccine, and it is a “killed virus vaccine” [a traditional vaccine consisting of virus particles, bacteria, or other pathogens that have been grown in culture and then killed to destroy disease-producing capacity].

So I think there’s some people jumping to some easy conclusions, like, “Oh, it’s just the pharmaceutical companies, they want to kill everybody to push their vaccine.” Well is the Chinese company the same as the American Pfizer and Moderna? The governments are paying for all this anyway. It’s not like people are paying for it. I think tomorrow, if they put this on the open market and say, “Listen, you have to pay money to get your vaccine,” no one would buy these vaccines. I think if they were just electively offered, I don’t think anybody would take the vaccines. In fact back when they were elective in April, no one took them. The word came out that the vaccines were dangerous, people started seeing their family members die, and because of that people didn’t take the vaccines. So we don’t need a lot of data. There was an informal internet survey done last summer on Twitter and the question was asked, “Do you know somebody who’s died after the vaccine?” The answer was about 12%. That’s enough. That is enough.

People talk in the church and on social media that people have lost family members. Everyone knows, no one wants these vaccines. That’s the reason why they’re protesting. That’s the reason why people are walking off the job. The vaccine mandates are leading people to take an injection and they don’t know if they’re going to die or not. They don’t know, in a sense, if they have committed their fatal act.

It just can’t be understated how critical this is. And so what happens is that doctors are telling patients to take the vaccine and patients are running for the hills. They’re changing doctors and saying, “I no longer trust my doctor. My doctor is no longer a trustworthy, believable person. They’re asking me to take a potentially lethal injection and I won’t do it.”

You often see www.forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2021/07/12/report-covid-19-vaccines-h...">https://www.forbes.com/sites/niallmccarthy/2021/07/12/report-covid-19-va...">studies coming out, and they’re often published in the mainstream media, saying that these vaccines have saved hundreds of thousands of lives and that the number of lives they’ve saved from COVID far exceeds the number lost by the vaccines. What do you say to that?

Well those are assumptions. The first false assumption is that the vaccines protect against COVID mortality, which they don’t. Not a single randomized trial has shown that. Then you make the next false assumption: that COVID-19 itself is untreatable and we’re just going to let everybody die with COVID-19. And then you put all those false assumptions into analysis, and you’d say, “Well, gosh, the vaccines have saved hundreds and millions of lives.” It’s all a series of false assumptions. The vaccines look like they haven’t stopped COVID at all. They haven’t reduced mortality of COVID at all. We’ve already reviewed the hospitalization data. Anywhere where we actually analyzed hospitalization, they haven’t stopped hospitalizations. They never stopped hospitalizations in randomized trials, they’re not doing that observationally, but the vaccines effectively have caused a massive loss of life, injury and permanent disability. That’s really where we’re at right now.

You’ve promoted for a long time the https://lymediseaseassociation.org/covid-19-and-lyme/peter-a-mccullough-...">effectiveness of early treatment over the vaccines.

Right, I was developing and promoting early treatment before the vaccines ever came along. So I was actively engaged in leading the world in treating COVID-19 before the vaccines were ever invented. This  is the stake in the ground and the vaccines never supplanted early treatment. Early treatment just got better and better and better. We have new products, new effective things we have. A recent analysis with omicron now in this paper by Lewnard in southern California shows that zero patients need a mechanical ventilator — zero — and this is the unvaccinated. You don’t need the vaccines. Zero people need to go on the ventilator.

Why hasn’t that message, your message, got through to public health policy in so many countries?

I’ll give you the data. So, there’s roughly 160 countries in the world. Let’s take hydroxychloroquine, the very first product. Now it’s modestly effective, about 25% benefit. Right now hydroxychloroquine is officially adopted for early treatment in 36 countries and by 53 medical organizations worldwide. Let’s take ivermectin. These were the first two early treatments. It’s now officially adopted for early treatment in 22 countries and 39 medical associations worldwide. So the answer there is that it’s partial, right? It’s not that these haven’t be adopted, it’s partial. The question is why haven’t all the countries done it? And what are the characteristics of the countries that have adopted compared to those who haven’t? That’s the real question. So it is interesting that the most westernized and lucrative types of biopharmaceutical markets, which would be the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, EU, South Africa, Australia, two South American countries, those are the ones who haven’t adopted [early treatments]. The countries that are not big biopharmaceutical markets, the Caribbean, the equatorial region around the world, they have adopted them.

So it’s a very interesting. There’s partial adoption of early treatment in the United States. We have four chartered, early treatment medical organizations. We have four and that’s pretty solid. We have treated in our prescription pharmaceutical use of hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin and monoclonal antibodies and we hope [these] will continue to be very robust as we treat patients, to reduce hospitalization death. And we have to treat vaccinated and unvaccinated, there’s no difference because the vaccines don’t work and people get COVID anyway, so we still need to treat them. So it’s imperative for those who have accepted the vaccine to understand that we still need to treat them anyway.

Do you think that the emergency’s lessening now with the omicron variant, that it’s not as serious as it was?

Right, and it’s easily treatable, that’s my experience too. So the emergency phase of the pandemic is now over. Many countries have recognized that. Across the UK, they’ve dropped mandates. Sweden has done the same. Eight states now that have gone against the US president and dropped the mandates, and eight Democratic governors have done that. We’ve always been divided. You know something’s wrong when states within a certain country don’t all behave the same way. We all use the same currency. We all have similar criminal laws and stuff, but we’re widely divergent on COVID-19. We could be in New York State, and people won’t let you go into a building unless you have a mask and a vaccine card, but we can be in Dallas, Texas, and you can walk in and there’s no mask, no vaccine and no discussion. What does that tell you? We’re the same country, with the same virus, so what’s going on, if the virus is the same and the people are the same? The difference is what’s in the minds of people. So there’s two diseases: there’s COVID-19 the disease, and then there’s the mental disease of what we call https://malone.substack.com/p/mass-formation-psychosis">mass formation psychosis.

Do you think that the Pope, the Vatican and the bishops in general are adequately informed about these vaccines? From what you say, they seem not to be, but do you think they need to be listening to wider sources because at the Vatican they now have www.ncregister.com/news/vatican-s-covid-mandate-part-2-december-decree-r...">https://www.ncregister.com/news/vatican-s-covid-mandate-part-2-december-...">some of the strictest mandates in the world: You cannot enter unless you are vaccinated, or you’ve recovered, and you have to wear the N95 masks. What advice would you give to the Vatican about their policy on COVID?

The Vatican should drop all mandates, drop all restrictions, and drop all advocacy or concern for the vaccines. The Vatican immediately should start a public interest campaign on vaccine injuries and vaccine deaths. They should formally apologize for taking a position on the vaccines that’s been deleterious and they will have to account for potentially hundreds of thousands of lives lost due to the vaccine worldwide because the Vatican has violated what’s called the Nuremberg Code — the Vatican has violated a critical code of bioethics and they must immediately recognize this. They must immediately apologize for this grievous error that they’ve committed. The Nuremberg Code states that no one under any conditions must apply any pressure, coercion or threat of reprisal for any medical treatment or procedure done, and particularly when the procedure is new, it’s investigational, it’s experimental, and we don’t know the outcomes.

I’ve just gone over with you that this is genetic material injected in human bodies, and we have no idea how long this is going to last and how great the injuries are going to be. They look catastrophic just at the early view of this. The Vatican must reverse their position. They must listen to people in positions of authority, including myself — immediately. And I’m happy to talk directly to the Pope. This is not a problem of lack of education. The Vatican and all religious leaders have all the information they can possibly have. These systems are open systems. A group from France said in March of 2021, “Shut down the program, it’s not safe.” The https://edwardpentin.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Bruno-et-al-SARS-C...">paper that I published with [Roxana] Bruno and colleagues, a worldwide paper including Europe, implored all governments to install safety boards and start reviewing the safety data. An evidence-based consulting group in the UK in June of 2021 https://edwardpentin.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Lawrie-Unsafe-For-...">reported officially to the MHRA and said, “shut down the program.” We’ve had petitions calling for the program to be shut down. This is not a matter of lack of education. This is a problem of complicity. This will go down in history as the Vatican is complicit in the mass loss of life of people by injections.

The Vatican’s Pontifical Academy for Life has also https://edwardpentin.co.uk/vaticans-pontifical-academy-for-life-pushes-c...">advocated vaccines for children. What’s your view on that?

The younger we go in age group, the risk of COVID-19, the viral illness, progressively goes down. In fact, most children don’t even get it because they’ve already had it and it’s milder than the next common cold that they have. That means the relative harm of the vaccines is even greater. So it is abhorrent. It violates every bit of sacred, religious belief that we have in terms of protecting our family and protecting our children, that the Vatican is abrogating one of its principle, Old Testament beliefs which is to protect the children. This is not protecting children. This is overtly harming children. And the Vatican must immediately reverse its course.

The Pope has called vaccination “www.vaticannews.va/en/pope/news/2021-08/pope-francis-appeal-covid-19-vac...">https://www.vaticannews.va/en/pope/news/2021-08/pope-francis-appeal-covi...">an act of love” and a “www.voanews.com/a/pope-francis-calls-covid-19-vaccination-moral-obligati...">https://www.voanews.com/a/pope-francis-calls-covid-19-vaccination-moral-...">moral obligation” — would you be willing to offer your advice to the Vatican?

I would be more than happy. As you mentioned, I have 54 peer-reviewed publications on COVID-19. I have over 660 peer-reviewed publications in the National Library of Medicine. I’ve chaired or participated in 2000 days of safety monitoring boards. I’ve had COVID-19 myself twice. I’ve had a family member lose their life to COVID-19. I am an expert commentator on national TV every week for the last two years. I consider myself the most qualified person to opine on COVID-19 and the vaccines than anybody in the world and that can be messaged directly to the Pope. If he wants to talk to the top authority in the world, I am open to a conversation, but it won’t be comfortable for him. So he needs to be warned about this. This is important. One life lost is too many. This idea that it’s a gift, that the Pope is giving a gift of loss of life, is absolutely unacceptable, and it must be met with the strongest of all resistance.

We are at a very, very important point in human history. You can tell by the gravity of these findings and these revelations, this is not a debatable thing. People are losing their lives due to this vaccine.

And I can tell you this much: even if the vaccine really worked, which it doesn’t, but even if it really worked, people still could take their choice: That they could die with a vaccine or die with a respiratory illness, and it would be a choice. It would be a very difficult choice, but they could take a choice. But the fact that the vaccines don’t work and they simply offer an opportunity, a stochastic opportunity to die within a few days from taking the injection, they are wholly unacceptable.

There’s an analysis of mortality, and I’m glad we’re still on mortality because I think that’s the most primal thing that we can consider, published by Ron Kostoff, and the title of the paper is “www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221475002100161X">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221475002100161X">Why Are We Vaccinating Children?.” This is in the peer-reviewed literature. This has been presented twice by the way at the USFDA meetings in September, and October by external presenters. The cost of analysis says someone at age 65 is more likely to die with the vaccine than taking their chances with COVID-19 and dying of COVID-19 respiratory illness. There’s a fivefold greater chance of dying with the vaccine. This is because if you take your chances with COVID-19, you may or may not get the illness. You could be fastidious and not get much contact and get low exposure, and that doesn’t even factor in early treatment which according to my estimates means 90-95% reductions in hospitalization and death. So you can imagine that it’s a much better choice to just take your chances with the respiratory illness than take your chances with the vaccine. And people say, “well, it’s rare.” Well, I have to tell you when we’re up to 21,000 Americans, this is actually worse than a war. We never said war casualties were “rare.” We took note of every war casualty. Every single vaccine death should be taken seriously. We can’t just write off human life with a casual stroke of a pen. It’s unacceptable, it’s immoral, it’s illegal.

What is your view on the mandates? Given what you say about the vaccines, would you consider them grossly unjust?

There are other mandates. In our US university system, we have requirements for the students to [get] the meningococcal vaccine for meningitis. This is a standard. There’s a waiver system. You can opt out of it, but most people don’t, and 20 million kids a year take them meningococcal vaccine. You don’t see any protests over that. Why? Because it’s an antigen-based vaccine that doesn’t go everywhere in the body. It has a safe mechanism of action. It has a safety track record that’s pristine. Nobody dies of the meningococcal vaccine. It effectively eliminates the chances of getting meningococcal meningitis. So we don’t have outbreaks in colleges anymore. So I’m telling you, a perfectly safe and effective vaccine people would accept. And if the COVID-19 vaccines were perfectly safe and effective, number one, COVID-19 would be gone by now, it wouldn’t be around, and two, people would widely accept it. There wouldn’t be any debate. If the vaccines were safe and effective, nobody would be wearing N95 masks in the Vatican. Things ought to be self-apparent at this point.

There’s a self-apparency here that I think we can’t deny. We ought to start looking at this and be saying, “You know what, let’s just examine ourselves here, this is just not adding up.” Even internal behaviors are not adding up.

What has been the personal cost to you of involving yourself in this cause?

I had no interest in becoming a public figure on this. My entire career and personal finances have been absolutely destroyed through this but I cannot stand by and watch this happen without speaking out. I do not see how any Christian can. It boils down to this idea of complicity. The Bible is loaded with phrases like this. If you stand by and you’re quiet and you watch it happen, you are participating in the crime. It’s clear.

The Church therefore has a duty to speak up.

 

Yes, there’s no doubt about it. (https://edwardpentin.co.uk/top-covid-19-expert-vatican-violating-code-of...">Top COVID-19 Expert: Vatican Violating Code of Bioethics, Must End Vaccine Mandate Now.)