Prevost's "Messengers" of Hope Set France Aflame Yet Again

France, the eldest daughter of the Church, is being set aflame by Robert Francis Prevost/Leo XIV’s “messengers of hope,” whom he has also called “heralds of hope,” in active cooperation with French Marxists, who are nothing other than the direct ideological descendants of the Jacobins responsible for the bloodletting that began on July 14, 1789, and has continued throughout much of the time since then, especially in 1830, 1871, and more or less on a regular basis in the past four decades.

While the seventh in the current line of antipopes is likely going to call for “dialogue” with the “aggrieved” “heralds of hope,” the hard truth that he, a hard-left ideologue after the pattern of his theologically, morally, and liturgical corrupt immediate predecessor, Jorge Mario Bergoglio (aka Argentine Apostate), can never accept is that the Mohammedans rioting in France at this time have no interest in the conciliar mania for the utter waste of time by engaging in “dialogue” with those who are “different” as they, like the Mohammedans who tried to invade France on October 10, 732, are interest in conquest, not “peaceful coexistence.”

One of the saddest commentaries of our times is that Mohammedans, adherents of a false, blasphemous religion that was born in violence and bloodshed, are more outraged about blasphemies committed against their false “prophet,” Mohammed, than Catholics are about blasphemies committed against Our Lord and Our Lady and the Holy Faith in the name of “freedom of the press” and “freedom of speech.” Believing Mohammedans take the precepts of their false religion quite seriously, and those precepts teach them to kill to avenge their false “prophet.” Far too many Catholics in the world, having been brainwashed by conciliarism’s “opening to the world,” enjoy blasphemous attacks on Our Lord, Our Lady, Saint Joseph and everything to do with the Holy Faith.

Then again, it is entirely unsurprising that Catholics accept blasphemies against the Divine Redeemer and His Most Immaculate Mother in the name of “freedom of the press” and “freedom of speech” when their “popes” and “bishops” have given them a steady stream of blasphemous words and sacrilegious actions over the course of sixty-eight years.

How is it possible for ordinary Catholics to recognize and reject blasphemy when the men who are their “leaders” are blasphemers who is countenance blasphemy, indecency, immodesty and vice under cover of the civil of law and all throughout what passes for “popular culture.” The situation is so bad today that Catholics do not even think about making reparation for acts of blasphemy against Our Lord, Our Lady and Holy Mother Church.

Unlike Mohammedans and other infidels, Catholics do not seek to kill those who blaspheme the true God of Divine Revelation, the Most Blessed Trinity, although it was once the case in Catholic France that such blasphemers were punished by the civil authority (noting that Saint Louis IX accepted papal correction from Pope Clement IV for the harsh measures he, Saint Louis, had taken against blasphemers). Catholics seek to pray for the conversion of those who blaspheme as they spend time in prayer, if possible, before the Most Blessed Sacrament and to Our Lady, especially through her Most Holy Rosary, for their conversion and to make reparation for these offenses against the Divine majesty.

The hubris of the French, so very certain that the tragedies that keep befalling their nation have nothing do with the direct consequence of the War on Christ the King that was begun on July 14, 1789, and reached its most bloodthirsty levels between the years of 1792 and 1795 during the Reign of Terror overseen by The Directory, is astounding.

How tragic it is that a revolution which celebrated the “rights of man” is being used by unbaptized infidels to attack police while they burn schools, churches and anything else they feel like destroying. The devil always uses his revolutions to mock and then to destroy, whether physically or spiritually—or both, those who celebrate their false principles. Go ask Maximilian Robespierre or Leon Trotsky, for instance.

Mohammedans take their false religion, which has always been at war with the true God of Divine Revelation and which thus has been at war with those who adore Him as the true God as members of the true Church, the Catholic Church, outside of which there is no salvation and without which there can be no true social order, very seriously.

Part of this seriousness involves a hatred of “infidels,” and there are none of those they hate more than Catholics. Oh, by the way, the Mohammedans make no distinctions between baptized Catholics who believe that Robert Francis Prevost/Leo XIV is the “pope” and those who do not. 

Believing, orthodox Mohammedans, following the example of their false prophet, Mohammed, whose bloodlust and hatred for Catholicism was such that he and his followers wiped out the Faith from most parts of North Africa where it had taken root over the course of six centuries, have a duty to kill Catholics. They do not stop to make any kind of distinctions. A person who wears a Crucifix, carries a Rosary or who is in a Catholic Church is fair game for Mohammedans, who get rather outraged when any Western government that has welcomed them in great numbers to compensate for the lack of indigenous workers caused by the ready acceptance of the chemical and surgical execution of the innocent preborn dares to respond with justifiable force after outbreaks of barbaric violence of the sort taking place in France now, not that Emauel Macron is capable of putting down the current wave of Mohammedan/Communist violence.

Indeed, it is not any exaggeration to state that the current wave of Mohammedan and Marxist violence is a direct and very organized response to Antipope Leo’s recent visit to France, something that was alluded to in a recent commentary by a writer named John Davidson of The Federalist website:

The riots in France last week stand as a warning to the United States and all western countries: mass immigration will split your country in two, and the two sides will eventually go to war.

The unrest, which quickly spread from the suburbs of Paris to encompass much of the country, stood in stark contrast to the scenes just a few days earlier when Pope Leo XIV drew massive crowds at every stop on his four-day papal visit. Some 800,000 people lined the Avenue des Champs-Élysées for an open-air Mass in Paris, catching the media and civil authorities by surprise. France is supposed to be a secular country, after all.

But the pope’s popularity on the one hand, and the riots that erupted across France a few days after his departure, on the other, illustrate the extent to which France today is not a single country or nation. It is not one people. There is ancient France, the true France, which despite the French Revolution and state-enforced secularism is still deeply Catholic, “the eldest daughter of the Church.” That is the France that showed up for Pope Leo.

The other France is the one we saw rioting in the streets last week. News reports said the unrest began in Créteil, a suburb of Paris, over the poor condition of the public schools. Disaffected high schoolers, fed up with overcrowded classes and dilapidated buildings, took to the streets spontaneously, so we’re told. From there, the rioting supposedly spread organically across the entire country in a matter of days.

There are a few problems with this narrative, beginning with the images and footage of the riots posted all over social media. What we see are not protests of classroom conditions, but the wanton destruction of schools, violent attacks on firefighters and police and even teachers, and all the indications of central organization and planning.

Among the “protesters,” we don’t see a broad cross-section of French society but overwhelmingly nonwhite males, immigrants and the children of immigrants. The barricades are being raised largely by Muslim youth of North African and Middle Eastern descent. Outside many schools, students weren’t chanting about funding cuts or classroom conditions, they were chanting “we are antifascists” and other such slogans. In Marseille, rioters flew the flag of Algeria and Hamas, not the tricolor. It was the same at a number of high schools that saw rioting.

It’s pretty obvious what’s going on, and who is behind the unrest. This is the Red-Green alliance of the socialist/Antifa left and Muslim immigrants, operationalized to bring the country to its knees through widespread rioting ahead of national elections next year. Indeed, the office of France’s prime minister, Sébastien Lecornu, on Friday made public that French intelligence is assessing the riots as orchestrated by proxies of Jean-Luc Mélenchon’s far-left party La France Insoumise (“France Unbowed”), or LFI. Mélenchon, who has denied LFI’s involvement, is running for president. 

In short, what is happening in France is that communists and Muslim migrants are joining forces, testing their strength on the eve of national elections. It might be illegal to say so in France, but these are ethnic riots, a show of force by unassimilated Muslim migrants and their hard-left revolutionary allies, who believe that together they are strong enough to overpower the native majority.

France has always been a tangle of contradictions and a center of spiritual conflict. It was the heart of Catholic Europe but also the cradle of revolutionary terror. It has been both the defender of Christendom and the Catholic Church’s greatest enemy, home of both the Jacobins and the Vendée. Today it is the same: a nation whose majority is still defined by its Catholic faith and heritage, as was plain to see during Pope Leo’s visit, but also a country whose leaders have welcomed civilizational enemies from the Muslim World that seek to destroy the true France.

The events unfolding across the Atlantic should cause alarm to us here in America, because the same forces at work there are at work here. An alliance of leftist and Muslim immigrants are emerging as a potent political force in the United States. This alliance is responsible for elevating people like Zohran Mamdani to the mayorship of New York City and driving the U.S. Senate candidacy of Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan.

Muslim immigrants to the West of course do not share everything in common with the radical left. Especially on issues like women’s right, transgenderism, gay marriage and the sexual revolution in general, they are not aligned. But those are disagreements for another day. For now, they are aligned above all in their desire to tear down western institutions and the Christian faith on which they were built. 

What that will look like in America we have yet to see in full. But if you want to get a rough idea, look at the riots in France. If we don’t put an end to Muslim immigration, that’s what our future holds. (The Riots In France Are A Warning For America.)

Leaving aside John Davidson’s acceptance of Robert Francis Prevost as “Pope Leo XIV,” Mr. Davidson’s commentary is essentially sound except for the fact that contemporary Western governments are found on Calvinist and Judeo-Masonic concepts that specifically and categorically reject the true foundations of Christendom during the Middle Ages. Contemporary Western governments have given rise to the lie of pluralism even though men need to be united by a common bond that transcends ethnicity and language, and that common bond is nothing other than Catholicism, plain and simple.

The ongoing riots are sooner any kind of legitimate “student protests” about conditions in state-run systems of mind control and programming (public schools) than was the takeover of the American Embassy in Teheran, Iran, on November 3, 1979, the work of “student militants.”

President Donald John Trump, for all his blindness about the immorality of his unnecessary war with Iran that may very well cost his hapless Republican colleagues control of both Houses of the Congress of the United States of America—and for all his refusal to condemn the Israeli genocide in Gaza and its current efforts to dispossess Palestinians from their homes in the West Bank in full violation of the Oslo Accords, was entirely correct yesterday to state that what is happening in France is nothing other than an “Islamic takeover”:

President Trump blamed the widespread student-led protests in France on Islam and “out of control mass migration” on Tuesday.

“What’s happening in France is nothing less than out of control mass migration. This isn’t about schools, this is about Islam wanting to take over a once great Country,” he wrote in a Truth Social post.

Student protests have called for more teachers and better schooling facilities, as neither immigration nor religion have been included in their demands, according to The New York Times.

Since late last month, protests have popped up across France, which has caused clashes with police and school officials. The protests began Sept. 21 at a high school in a suburb of Paris over teacher shortages and deteriorating building conditions.  

One student, Issam Makhloufi, described conditions in the classroom as “not ventilated,” and that students “can barely open the windows,” per The Times.

Since the start of the protests, more than 100 students, police officers and demonstrators have been injured, while Education Minister Édouard Geffray told France 2 at least 24 schools have been ransacked or set on fire.

A 15-year-old reportedly lost his lower arm and hand after he picked up and detonated a police stun grenade, newspaper La Voix du Nord reported. At least one student lost teeth and others suffered eye injuries during the protests, according to the BBC.

It is unclear when the protests may end, as France’s justice minister Gérald Darmanin said, “one of the difficulties of this movement is that there are no national demands. It all started with local demands.”

Conservatives have echoed Trump’s point, blaming the European Union’s (EU) immigration policies for the protests.

“I would also say as we’re sitting here in beautiful New York City, this is a cautionary tale,” Fox News co-host Tomi Lahren said on “The Big Weekend Show.”

In June, the EU enacted an overhaul of its immigration system, increasing deportations and beginning construction on detention centers abroad. Critics of the overhaul compared it to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in the U.S. which has detained a record number of people in Trump’s second term. 

French President Emmanuel Macron also alleged in January that Trump wanted to “weaken and subordinate” Europe, adding in February that the Trump administration was “openly anti-European.”

Macron’s comments spill over into issues including Trump’s push to acuire Greenland and his tariff policies. (Donald Trump blames student protests in France on 'mass migration,' Islam.)

Need it be pointed out that it was on this very date four hundred fifty-five years ago that the combined Christian naval forces under the command of Don Juan of Austria overcame the Turkish fleet and thus crushed yet another effort on the part of Mohammedans to invade and conquer Europe? (Please see the accompanying article for the details.)

Ah, the history of brave Catholic repelling Mohammedans from the time of the Seventh Century to the present is but an embarrassment to the conciliar “popes” and almost all of their “bishops,” which is why Robert Francis Prevost/Leo XIV went to great lengths fifteen months ago term migrants as “messengers of hope”:

This link between migration and hope is clearly evident in many contemporary experiences of migration. Many migrants, refugees and displaced persons are privileged witnesses of hope. Indeed, they demonstrate this daily through their resilience and trust in God, as they face adversity while seeking a future in which they glimpse that integral human development and happiness are possible. Moreover, we can see the itinerant experience of the people of Israel repeated in their own lives: “O God, when you went out before your people, when you marched through the wilderness, the earth quaked, the heavens poured down rain at the presence of God, the God of Sinai, at the presence of God, the God of Israel. Rain in abundance, O God, you showered abroad; you restored your heritage when it languished; your flock found a dwelling in it; in your goodness, O God, you provided for the needy” (Ps 68:7-10).

In a world darkened by war and injustice, even when all seems lost, migrants and refugees stand as messengers of hope. Their courage and tenacity bear heroic testimony to a faith that sees beyond what our eyes can see and gives them the strength to defy death on the various contemporary migration routes. Here too we can find a clear analogy with the experience of the people of Israel wandering in the desert, who faced every danger while trusting in the Lord’s protection: “he will deliver you from the snare of the fowler and from the deadly pestilence; he will cover you with his pinions, and under his wings you will find refuge; his faithfulness is a shield and buckler. You will not fear the terror of the night, or the arrow that flies by day, or the pestilence that stalks in darkness, or the destruction that wastes at noonday” (Ps 91:3-6).

Migrants and refugees remind the Church of her pilgrim dimension, perpetually journeying towards her final homeland, sustained by a hope that is a theological virtue. Each time the Church gives in to the temptation of “sedentarization” and ceases to be a civitas peregrine, God’s people journeying towards the heavenly homeland (cf. Augustine, De Civitate Dei, Books XIV-XVI), she ceases to be “in the world” and becomes “of the world” (cf. Jn 15:19). This temptation was already present in the early Christian communities, so much so that the Apostle Paul had to remind the Church of Philippi that “our citizenship is in heaven, and it is from there that we are expecting a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ. He will transform the body of our humiliation that it may be conformed to the body of his glory, by the power that also enables him to make all things subject to himself” (Phil 3:20-21).

In a special way, Catholic migrants and refugees can become missionaries of hope in the countries that welcome them, forging new paths of faith where the message of Jesus Christ has not yet arrived or initiating interreligious dialogue based on everyday life and the search for common values. With their spiritual enthusiasm and vitality, they can help revitalize ecclesial communities that have become rigid and weighed down, where spiritual desertification is advancing at an alarming rate. Their presence, then, should be recognized and appreciated as a true divine blessing, an opportunity to open oneself to the grace of God, who gives new energy and hope to his Church: “Do not neglect to show hospitality to strangers, for by doing that some have entertained angels without knowing it” (Heb 13:2).

The first element of evangelization, as Saint Paul VI emphasized, is that of witness: “All Christians are called to this witness, and in this way they can be real evangelizers. We are thinking especially of the responsibility incumbent on migrants in the country that receives them” (Evangelii Nuntiandi, 21). This is a true missio migrantium, a mission carried out by migrants, for which adequate preparation and ongoing support must be ensured through effective inter-ecclesial cooperation.

At the same time, the communities that welcome them can also be a living witness to hope, one that is understood as the promise of a present and a future where the dignity of all as children of God is recognized. In this way, migrants and refugees are recognized as brothers and sisters, part of a family in which they can express their talents and participate fully in community life.

On this Jubilee, when the Church prays for all migrants and refugees, I wish to entrust all those who are on the journey, as well as those who are working to accompany them, to the maternal protection of the Virgin Mary, comfort of migrants, so that she may keep hope alive in their hearts and sustain them in their commitment to building a world that increasingly resembles the Kingdom of God, the true homeland that awaits us at the end of our journey. (Message of Robert Francis Prevost/Leo XIV the Holy Father for the 111^th World Day of Migrants and Refugees 2025.)

The conciliar refusal to believe, no less state firmly, that Mohammedanism is violent of its very false and blasphemous nature is why Robert Francis Prevost/Leo XIV cannot admit that the Mohammedan invasion of Europe by means of legal and illegal immigration is not the same thing as the “coexistence” that has existed in the Middle East over the centuries. Christians are in the minority of predominantly Mohammedan countries in the Middle East and Holy Mother Church has long sought their ability to practice the Holy Faith unmolested by the religious and civil authorities.

The Mohammedans who have been invading Europe in the past thirty to forty years want to supplant the few remnants of Catholicism that have not already been uprooted by Eurosocialists, who continue to do everything possible to permit Mohammedans the widest possible latitude in the observance of their false religion, up to and including the use of Sharia Law in some instances in the United Kingdom, and to turn a blind eye to violent crimes against persons and property by underreporting crimes committed by Mohammedans, thus creating the false perception that the number of such crimes have been “exaggerated” by xenophobic “hates” who are opposed to migration.

Indeed, Prevost/Leo himself implied in an answer to a question posed to him during his return flight to Rome from Lebanon ten months ago it is xenophobia that has inspired opposition to the presence of large numbers of Mohammedans in Europe

Often, fear of Muslims in the West is "generated by people who are against immigration and are trying to keep out people who may be from another country, another religion, another race," he said. "In that sense, I would say that we all need to work together." (Prevost tells reporters dialogue is always the answer to tense situations.)

This is so facile as to defy comprehension.

It would appear that “Pope Leo” pays no more attention to the reality of Mohammedan violence and to its Christophobic nature as he does to the incidents of violent crimes committed by illegal immigrants/asylum seekers here in the United States of America.

Robert Francis Prevost/Leo XIV does not think that it is necessary for nations to be united by the ties of the true Faith, to say nothing of linguistic and cultural unity, as the conciliar worldview rejects the immutable Catholic teaching that all men must submit themselves in humility and docility to the entirety of the Sacred Deposit of Faith that Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ has revealed exclusively to His true Church for Its infallible explication and eternal safekeeping.

Moreover, the conciliar “popes” and many of their “bishops” welcomed Mohammedans for “returning God to Europe” even Mohammedans, along with Talmudists, of course, do not believe in the Most Holy Trinity and the Incarnation of the Second Person of the Most Blessed Trinty made man in the Virginal and Immaculate Womb of the Blessed Virgin Mary.

For example, the late Jean-Louis Tauran said the following almost exactly nineteen years ago while welcoming the “benefits” of the hordes of Mohammedans who have taken full advantage of Europe’s collective demographic suicide by means of contraception, sterilization, abortion, and, in recent decades, the public celebration, protection, and promotion of the sin of Sodom and its various mutations as a matter of human “rights” and public policy:

A senior Vatican cardinal has thanked Muslims for bringing God back into the public sphere in Europe and said believers of different faiths had no option but to engage in interreligious dialogue.

Cardinal Jean-Louis Tauran, head of the Catholic Church’s department for interfaith contacts, said religion was now talked and written about more than ever before in today’s Europe.

“It’s thanks to the Muslims,” he said in a speech printed in Friday’s L’Osservatore Romano, the official daily of the Vatican. “Muslims, having become a significant minority in Europe, were the ones who demanded space for God in society.”

Vatican officials have long bemoaned the secularisation of Europe, where church attendance has dwindled dramatically in recent decades, and urged a return to its historically Christian roots. But Tauran said no society had only one faith.

“We live in multicultural and multireligious societies, that’s obvious,” he told a meeting of Catholic theologians in Naples. “There is no civilisation that is religiously pure.”

Tauran’s positive speech on interfaith dialogue came after a remark by Pope Benedict prompted media speculation that the Vatican was losing interest in it. Some Jewish leaders reacted with expressions of concern and the Vatican denied any change.

The “return of God” is clearly seen in Tauran’s native France, where Europe’s largest Muslim minority has brought faith questions such as women’s headscarves into the political debate after decades when they were considered strictly private issues.

“GOD IS AT WORK IN ALL”

Tauran said religions were “condemned to dialogue,” a practice he called “the search for understanding between two subjects, with the help of reason, in view of a common interpretation of their agreement and disagreement.”

That seemed to clarify Benedict’s statement on Sunday that interfaith dialogue was “not possible in the strict sense of the word”. Church officials said a strict definition would include the option that one side is ultimately convinced by the other.

Dialogue participants could not give up their religious convictions, Tauran said, but should be open to learning about the positive aspects of each others’ faith.

“Every religion has its own identity, but I agree to consider that God is at work in all, in the souls of those who search for him sincerely,” he said. “Interreligious dialogue rallies all who are on the path to God or to the Absolute.”

The uncertainty about the Vatican view coincided with increasing contacts among world religions.

Early this month, the Vatican held a pioneering conference with a delegation from the “Common Word” group of Muslim scholars who invited Christian churches to a new dialogue.

A week later, Saudi King Abdullah gathered world leaders at the United Nations as part of a dialogue he launched with a conference of faith leaders in Madrid last July.

Christianity and Islam are the world’s two largest faiths, with two billion and 1.3 billion followers respectively. The latest interfaith efforts are meant to counter growing tensions between these two after the Sept. 11 attacks.

An Indian prelate, speaking after the Mumbai attacks began, said in Rome that a lack of courage to meet across faith lines was often behind religious violence in his country.

Archbishop Felix Machado of Nashik diocese, just east of Mumbai, told Italian priests the violence was caused by “inequality, a lack of justice and understanding and, above all, a lack of courage to dialogue,” the Vatican daily reported. (Vatican thanks Muslims for returning God to Europe.)

An author of a 2025 New York Post article noted that what he thinks is the Catholic Church’s benign view of Mohammedanism is Louis Massignon, a Frenchman who believed it was his mission to unite the "Abrahamic religions.” Massignon worked for a “reconciliation” with Mohammedanism about the same time as Marc Sagnier’s Sillon was condemned by Pope Saint Pius X in Notre Charge Apostolique, August 15, 1910, for its efforts to “reconcile” Catholicism with the anti-Theistic principles of the French Revolution:

Leo’s comments express more than blissful sentimentality. They reveal the Vatican’s role in encouraging open borders and exempting migrants from accountability.

In Europe’s case, that involves deliberate blindness to the violent, totalitarian nature of Islam and many of its followers.

This Catholic approach toward Islam reflects the ideas of Louis Massignon, a French scholar from the early 20th century. Massignon described Islam as “the faith of Abraham revived with Muhammad,” and asserted that Muslims “have the right to equality among the monotheisms descended from Abraham.”

French Catholic scholar Alain Besançon described the results.

“An entire literature favorable to Islam has grown up in Europe, much of it the work of Catholic priests under the sway of Massignon’s ideas,” he wrote.

Besançon attributed that posture to “an underlying dissatisfaction with modernity, and with our liberal, capitalist, individualistic arrangements,” a dissatisfaction that the Vatican embodies.

“Alarmed by the ebbing of religious faith in the Christian West, and particularly in Europe,” Massignon’s advocates “cannot but admire Muslim devoutness,” Besançon wrote.

“Surely, they reason, it is better to believe in something than to believe in nothing, and since these Muslims believe in something, they must believe in the same thing we do.”

The Catholic Church officially embraced Massignon’s ideas at the Second Vatican Council in two documents. One, Nostra Aetate, focused on the church’s relationship with Judaism but additionally addressed Islam:

“The Church regards with esteem the Muslims. They adore the one God . . . they take pains to submit wholeheartedly to even His inscrutable decrees, just as Abraham, with whom the faith of Islam takes pleasure in linking itself, submitted to God. Though they do not acknowledge Jesus as God, they revere Him as a prophet.”

The other, Lumen Gentium, declared that “the plan of salvation also includes those who acknowledge the Creator. In the first place among these there are the Muslims, who, professing to hold the faith of Abraham, along with us adore the one and merciful God.”

That passage made the Catholic catechism.

But what Besançon called “indulgent ecumenicism” toward Islam goes beyond words. During John Paul II’s papacy, the church embraced outright appeasement.

Catholic bishops sold underutilized churches and schools to Muslim groups; many of the churches became mosques.

In October 2006, the Capuchin Franciscan friars agreed to help the Union of Islamic Communities and Organizations in Italy (UCOII) build a mosque in Genoa next to a monastery. The friars even helped build the mosque’s foundation.

But the UCOII — affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood — advocates “an extremist version of the Quran, where Christians, Jews and Westerners are criminalized, as well as women and other Muslims who don’t submit to their rule,” Magdi Allam, a convert to Catholicism from Islam, reported for Milan’s Corriere della Sera.

In 2006, the group also demanded Islamic schools, banks and clerical review of textbooks. Its president, Mohamed Nour Dachan, refused to sign a document pledging Muslims to accept Italy’s constitution, denounce terrorism and recognize Israel’s right to exist.

Seven months earlier, a Vatican cardinal even suggested that Muslim students receive Islamic religious instruction in the hour reserved for Catholic instruction in Italian schools.

“If there are 100 Muslim children in a school, I don’t see why they shouldn’t be taught their religion,” said the late Cardinal Renato Martino, then the president of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace. “If we said ‘no’ until we saw equivalent treatment for the Christian minorities in Muslim countries, I would say that we were placing ourselves on their level.”

In 2008, the Catholic bishops of England and Wales asked Catholic schools to reserve prayer rooms for Muslim students and to adapt bathroom facilities for ritual cleansing before prayer. But the worst example of appeasement took place in Belgium.

As part of a campaign to force the government to grant amnesty, Belgium’s Catholic bishops turned their churches into homes for Muslim migrants, making them squatters.

In May 2006, more than 30 Belgian churches served such a purpose. About 300 Africans occupied Antwerp’s Magdalena Chapel. Other churches held as many as 700 squatters.

At Our Lady of Succor Church in Brussels, squatters lived in small tents donated by Catholic relief agencies, conducted Muslim services, erected computer tables near the pulpit and even set fires on the floor.

Friar Herwig Arts described a scene at Antwerp’s Jesuit chapel: migrants “removed the tabernacle [and] installed a television set and radios, depriving us of the opportunity to pray in our own chapel and say Mass.”

He went on, “For me, the place has been desecrated. I feel I cannot enter it anymore.”

Belgium’s bishops were not amused. Arts was chided by Belgium’s leading clergy. “Solidarity cannot be limited to one’s own nation, said the late Cardinal Godfried Danneels, then the country’s leading prelate. Monsingor Luc van Looy, then the bishop of Ghent, even said “illegal fugitives” were “entitled to a good place in our society. Arts has been silent on the topic ever since.

But two decades later, Kazakhstan’s Bishop Schneider refuses to stay silent: “This is a global political agenda by the powerful of the world to destroy Europe.”

Leo thus faces an existential challenge, one that blissful sentimentality cannot answer: Will he allow a church that played a pivotal role in creating European civilization to perform a more decisive part in destroying it? (Pope Leo must stand up to Muslim immigrants seeking to remake Europe.)

It is utter fantasy to think that any conciliar “pope” is going to “stand up” to Mohammedan immigrants nor to denounce the use of “sharia law” in the courts of one formerly Catholic country another, no less condemn Mohammedan violence in France currently for what it is.

Yes, the Mohammedan migrants have brought great "hope" to Europe, haven't they?

No, of course not.

No, the conciliar "popes" and their "bishops" have existed in a delusional world that is detached from the reality of the fact Mohammedanism is a religion of violence of its very perverse nature and that those of its adherents who commit violent acts are simply being faithful to their blasphemous "holy book," the Koran, and to the bloodthirsty example of their false prophet, Mohammed. 

As noted at the beginning of this commentary, his is the logical result of the Protestant Revolution’s overthrow of the Social Reign of Christ the King five hundred years ago that made possible the rise and the triumph of the anti-Incarnational civil state of Judeo-Masonry that trumpets pluralism but is mean to lead to the intolerant totalitarianism of Antichrist himself.

The Europe of Modernity and the conciliar sect of Modernism are thus as one in order to appease men no matter how much they offend Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ and to reject the great patrimony of how Catholic kings and princes defended Christendom from Mohammedan invasions, starting, as mentioned before, with Charles Martel’s defense of France at the Battle of Tours (Poitier) on October 10, 732.

The readings in Matins for today’s Feast of the Holy Rosary of the Blessed Virgin Mary teach us about the origins and the power of Our Lady's Most Holy Rosary:

When the heresy of the Albigenses was making head against God in the County of Toulouse, and striking deeper roots every day, the holy Dominic, who had but just laid the foundations of the Order of Friars Preachers, threw his whole strength into the travail of plucking these blasphemies up. That he might be fitter for the work, he cried for help with his whole soul to that Blessed Maiden, whose glory the falsehoods of the heretics so insolently assailed, and to whom it hath been granted to trample down every heresy throughout the whole earth. It is said that he had from her a word, bidding him preach up the saying of the Rosary among the people, as a strong help against heresy and sin, and it is wonderful with how stout an heart and how good a success he did the work laid upon him. This Rose-garden (or Rosary) is a certain form of prayer, wherein we say one-hundred-and-fifty times the salutation of the Angel, and the Lord's Prayer between every ten times, and, each of the fifteen times that we say the Lord's Prayer, and repeat tenfold the salutation, think of one of fifteen great events in the history of our Redemption. From that time forth this form of godly prayer was extraordinarily spread about by holy Dominic, and waxed common. That this same Dominic was the founder and prime mover thereof hath been said by Popes in divers letters of the Apostolic See.

From this healthy exercise have grown up numberless good fruits in the Christian Commonwealth. Among these deserveth well to be named that great victory over the Sultan of Turkey, which the most holy Pope Pius V, and the Christian Princes whom he had roused, won at Lepanto, (on the 7th day of October, the first Lord's Day in the month, in the year of our Lord 1571) The day whereon this victory was gained was the very one whereon the Guildbrethren of the most holy Rosary, throughout the whole world, were used to offer their accustomed prayers and appointed supplications, and the event therefore was not unnaturally connected therewith. This being the avowed opinion of Gregory XIII, he ordered that in all Churches where there was, or should be, an Altar of the Rosary, a Feast, in the form of a Greater Double, should be kept for ever upon the first Lord's Day of the month of October, to give unceasing thanks to the Blessed Virgin, under her style of (Queen of) the (Most Holy) Rosary, for that extraordinary mercy of God. Other Popes also have granted almost numberless Indulgences to those who say the Rosary, and to those who join its Guilds.

In the year 1716, Charles VI, Elect-Emperor of the Romans, won a famous victory over countless hordes of Turks, near Timisoara, in the kingdom of Hungary, upon the day when the Feast of the Dedication of the Church of St Mary of the Snows was being kept, and almost at the very moment when the Guild-brethren of the most holy Rosary were moving through the streets of Rome in public and solemn procession, amid vast multitudes, all filled with the deepest enthusiasm, calling vehemently upon God for the defeat of the Turks, and entreating the Virgin Mother of God to bring the might of her succour to the help of the Christians. A few days later, (upon the Octave of the Feast of the Assumption,) the Turks raised the siege of Corfu. These mercies Clement XI devoutly ascribed to the helpful prayers of the Blessed Virgin, and that the memory and the sweetness of such a blessing might for all time coming endure gloriously, he extended to the whole Church the observance of the Feast of the most holy Rosary, for the same day and of the same rank, (as it had already been in the places before mentioned.) Benedict XIII commanded the record of all these things to be given a place in the Service-book of the Church of Rome; and Leo XIII, in the most troublous times of the Church and the cruel storm of long pressing evils, by fresh Apostolic letters vehemently urged upon all the faithful throughout the earth the often saying of the Rosary of (the Blessed Virgin) Mary, raised the dignity of the yearly festival, added to the Litany of Loretto the Invocation Queen of the Most Holy Rosary, and granted to the whole Church a special Office for this solemn occasion. Let us all then be earnest in honouring the most holy Mother of God in this form which she liketh so well, that even as the entreaties of Christ's faithful people, approaching her in her Garden of Roses, have so often won her to scatter and destroy their earthly foes, so she may gain for them the victory over their hellish foes likewise. (Matins, Divine Office, Feast of the Most Holy Rosary of the Blessed Virgin Mary.)

We must be earnest in our efforts to use Our Lady's Most Holy Rosary and devotion to her Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart, and through that Heart, which we pierced by our sins with Seven Swords of Sorrow, to the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus to make reparation for our own sins and those of the whole world.

We must make sacrifices to the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary for the conversion of sinners.

We must be truly sorry for our own sins and to grow to despise them so much that we lose all attachment even to our least venial sins, which is, after all, one of the conditions for gaining a Plenary Indulgence (and those who are totally consecrated to Jesus through Mary, either according to the formula of Saint Louis de Montfort or Father Maximilian Kolbe, recognize that whatever merits they gain, including Plenary Indulgences, as a result of their prayers and actions are not theirs, that they belong totally to Our Lady to be disposed of as she sees fit to make use of them). We must also understand that even the slightest attachment to heresy and error, including those being propagated by Robert Francis Prevost/Leo XIV at this time, is displeasing to God and makes our souls less capable of seeing the world clearly through the eyes of the true Faith and of choosing the good in accordance with that same Holy Faith.

Our Lady of the Rosary, pray for us.

Saint Joseph, pray for us.

Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.

Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.

Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.

Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.

Saints Caspar, Melchior, and Balthasar, pray for us.

Pope Saint Mark, pray for us.

Saints Sergius, Bacchus, and Apeluius, pray for us.