Polluting the Atmosphere With the Smoke of Antichrist, part ten/Circus Jorge, part two

Among the many confounding, Edgar Kennedy slow-burn inducing features of the counterfeit church of conciliarism is the occasional effort on the part of “conservative” “bishops” and to defend remnants of Catholic truth while serving as apologists for the foundational “doctrines” of the “Second” Vatican Council that make a mockery of the immutability of God and of the very Divine Constitution of Holy Mother Church. As noted most recently in Circus Jorge, part one, to think that it is possible for “conservative” “bishops” to defend the binding precepts of the Sixth and Ninth Commandments while supporting violations of First, Second and Third Commandments is absurd to point of doing one of those Edgar Kennedy slow burns by way of an exasperated reaction.

Blind to the fact that it is impossible defend the immutability of moral truth while supporting doctrinal untruths, the president of Polish conference of conciliar “bishops, “Archbishop” Stanislaw Gadecki, gave an interview that aired on the Eternally Wishful Television Network in the Federal Republic of Germany before the beginning of Circus Jorge on Sunday, October 4, 2015, the Nineteenth Sunday after Pentecost and the Commemoration of Saint Francis of Assisi:

The head of Poland’s bishops has given a lengthy and hard-hitting interview in which he upholds the Church’s teaching on marriage and the family, voices his opposition to Church decentralization, and calls gender ideology worse than Communism.

In the interview broadcast on EWTN Germany, Archbishop Stanisław Gądecki said that the Church “can’t sing with 100 different voices as postmodernity would like it to.”

“If the Church were to teach 10 or 100 doctrines,” he added, “she would break apart into 100 churches, but the Church is one, catholic and apostolic.”

The archbishop, who is one of three Polish bishops attending the Oct. 4-25 Ordinary Synod, was responding to comments made earlier this year by Cardinal Reinhard Marx, president of the German bishops’ conference.

The cardinal said Germany can’t wait for the current Synod on the Family to make this or that decision, and that the German church is not “a subsidiary of Rome.” Archbishop Gądecki was also responding to a general push by some European bishops ahead of the synod to devolve teaching authority away from Rome.

In the EWTN interview, the archbishop also quashed talk of a spirit of consensus ahead of the synod, saying he saw “no way to create a compromise” between truth and untruth. “What compromise can there already be between truth and untruth?” he asked.

As the synod got underway yesterday, some of those running the meeting were at pains to point out the general spirit of consensus that is present. Archbishop Bruno Forte, the synod’s special secretary who was criticized last year for forcing through an agenda many believed was at odds with Church teaching, insisted “there’s no division, conflict, it’s not what I feel.”* He instead criticized last year’s media interpretation of the synod as “often bipolar.”

Elsewhere in the interview, the president of the Polish bishops’ conference said gender ideology has similarities with Communism in that it has “no regard for the human person” as it doesn’t recognize human dignity as Christianity does, and is even worse than Marxism because it is “a pure ideology that is actually bent on destroying marital and familial relationships.”

“By teaching gender theory, the good of having marriage and family is thrown into doubt, the institutions of marriage and family are destroyed by being labeled as ‘oppressive’, as diminishing humanity rather than growing it,” he warned. He said the ideology may take different forms, but the aim is the same: “the pulverization of society, so that man stays alone and is more easily manipulated.”

The archbishop also highlighted the problem of discussing mercy, but with less emphasis on justice, sin and the notion of the truth. “That is a hermeneutic mistake [an erroneous interpretation],” he said. “Justice and mercy are inseparable from one another.” A person can experience mercy “by converting, by returning to the House of the Father after staring into the abyss.”

But he stressed that “no matter what situation a marriage might find itself in, be it regular or irregular, they must be aware that divine mercy accompanies them, immutably, for it is only in such a setting that they will not revert to guilt but strive to extricate themselves from sin and return to grace.” (No Compromise Between Truth and Untruth.)

“Archbishop” Gadecki said much that was true in his interview. There is no compromise between truth and untruth. This is very correct.

Unfortunately for Mr. Gadecki, the sixty-six year-old conciliar “archbishop” of Poznan, Poland, it was his own “Polish” “pope,” Karol Wojtyla/John Paul II, who appointed men such as Reinhard Marx to the conciliar “episcopate” in 1996 and it was the “restorer of tradition,” Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI, who elevated him to the conciliar college of cardinals in 2010. Most of the revolutionaries participating at the ongoing “synod of bishops” in the Paul VI Audience Hall inside the walls of the Occupied Vatican on the West Bank of the Tiber River were appointed by an influential “father” of the “Second” Vatican Council, Wojtyla/John Paul II, and one of its most influential periti, Ratzinger/Benedict XVI. The revolutionaries who are attacking what is left of any recognizably Catholic in the doctrines and pastoral practices of the counterfeit church of conciliarism at the current “synod of bishops” have not disguised their views over the decades. Each has been completely consistent, and their views were to known to the Modernist Wojtyla/John Paul II and to the “New Theologian” Ratzinger/Benedict when they appointed or promoted to the conciliar “hierarchy” and/or to the conciliar college of “cardinals.”

Moreover, it is none other than the man to whom Stanislaw Gadecki does obeisance as a true and legitimate Successor of Saint Peter, Jorge Mario Bergoglio, agrees with everything that Reinhard Marx believes on every issue, up to and including the decentralization of “doctrinal” decision-making away from the supposedly “rigid” conciliar Congregation for the Destruction and Deformation of the Faith. Bergoglio has in fact said this a number of times in his capacity as “Petrine Minister” Francis, something that he made clear in no uncertain terms in Evangelii Gaudium, November 26, 2013:

32. Since I am called to put into practice what I ask of others, I too must think about a conversion of the papacy. It is my duty, as the Bishop of Rome, to be open to suggestions which can help make the exercise of my ministry more faithful to the meaning which Jesus Christ wished to give it and to the present needs of evangelization. Pope John Paul II asked for help in finding “a way of exercising the primacy which, while in no way renouncing what is essential to its mission, is nonetheless open to a new situation”.[35] We have made little progress in this regard. The papacy and the central structures of the universal Church also need to hear the call to pastoral conversion. The Second Vatican Council stated that, like the ancient patriarchal Churches, episcopal conferences are in a position “to contribute in many and fruitful ways to the concrete realization of the collegial spirit”.[36] Yet this desire has not been fully realized, since a juridical status of episcopal conferences which would see them as subjects of specific attributions, including genuine doctrinal authority, has not yet been sufficiently elaborated.[37] Excessive centralization, rather than proving helpful, complicates the Church’s life and her missionary outreach.

33. Pastoral ministry in a missionary key seeks to abandon the complacent attitude that says: “We have always done it this way”. I invite everyone to be bold and creative in this task of rethinking the goals, structures, style and methods of evangelization in their respective communities. A proposal of goals without an adequate communal search for the means of achieving them will inevitably prove illusory. I encourage everyone to apply the guidelines found in this document generously and courageously, without inhibitions or fear. The important thing is to not walk alone, but to rely on each other as brothers and sisters, and especially under the leadership of the bishops, in a wise and realistic pastoral discernment. (Jorge Mario Bergoglio, Evangelii Gaudium, November 26, 2013.)

Bergoglio's desire to shift decision-making powers even on doctrinal matters to the level of the national "episcopal" conferences is the realization of the goals of his fellow revolutionaries and makes prophets out of them for daring to assert what I was taught by a conciliar presbyter when riding from Emmaus, Pennsylvania, to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Karol Wojtyla/John Paul II's liturgical extravaganza at Logan Circle there on Thursday, October 4, 1979, the Feast of Saint Francis of Assisi, as he envisioned a day where "Rome was nothing more than a clearinghouse for the ideas and liturgies developed at the local level." While such has been the case on a de facto basis for a long time now, Bergoglio used Evangelii Gaudium to put his "official" seal of approval on that which about which he has discoursed for decades. After having felt what he believed to have been the "stinging wrath" of "Rome" during his time as conciliar "archbishop" of Buenos Aires, Argentina from 1998 to 2013, Bergoglio desires to institutionalize this devolution of power on a de jure (a matter of law) basis. Stanislaw Gadecki is thus opposing not only Reinhard Marx. He is opposing “Pope Francis” himself as Commissar Marx and Jorge are of one mind on everything.

While reports that “Archbishop” Gadecki is making available on his Polish language blog (http://abpgadecki.pl/popoludniowa-sesja-2-dzien-synodu/) indicate that there are more conciliar “bishops” defending the indissolubility of a ratified and consummated marriage and who are opposed to the sodomite agenda than is being revealed by the propaganda machine controlled by “Fathers” Federico Lombardi, S.J., and Thomas Rosica, C.S.B., the fact that there is any kind of organized “episcopal” support for propositions contrary to the teaching of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ is entirely unsurprising as none of the “conservative” “bishops” gathered at present in the Paul the Sick Audience Hall—or anywhere else in the world for that matter—opposes the underlying false tenets of the “Second” Vatican Council and the “magisterium” of the conciliar “popes.”

Perhaps more importantly, however, is the fact that the “conservative” “bishops” for whom so many in the “resist while recognize” are “rooting” for at this time are perfectly sanguine about Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI’s philosophically absurd and dogmatically condemned “hermeneutic of continuity,” which was simply a repackaging of Karol Wojtyla/John Paul II’s “living tradition,” which was a repackaging of the false, condemned Modernist precept of the “evolution of dogma. To accept conciliarism one must be willing to “square” the circle, so to speak, by “reconciling” the Catholic Church’s consistent condemnation of such falsehoods as “ecumenism,” “inter-religious prayer” sessions, “religious liberty,” and “separation of Church and State.

Even the much-vaunted “Bishop” Athanasius Schneider, an auxiliary “bishop” of the Diocese of Astana, Kazahstan, who opposes the distribution of what purports to be “Holy Communion” in the hand in the Protestant and Judeo-Masonic Novus Ordo liturgical service and is opposed to the anti-family agenda of the current “synod” (to which he was not named by Bergoglio as a participant), supports false ecumenism, something that he made very clear in an interview last year with the Latin Mass Society of England (a group that has had, it would appear, a willingness to “obey” the devil himself if the circumstances required such “obedience”—see Was the post on the LMS an “over reaction):

On sharing Holy Communion with Anglicans and others?
BAS: ‘This is not possible. There are different faiths. Holy Communion is not a means to achieve unity. It is the last step, not the first step. It would be a desecration of the Holy. Of course, we have to be one. Yet we have differences in belief, some substantial differences. The Eucharist is a sign of the deepest unity. It would be a lie, it would be contradictory to logic sharing Holy Communion with non-Catholics.

‘Ecumenism is necessary in order to be in contact with our separated brethren, to love them. In the midst of the challenge of the new paganism, we can and have to collaborate with serious non-Catholics to defend the revealed Divine truth and the natural law, created by God.’

‘It will be better not to have such a structure when the State is governing the life of the Church, such as for instance the appointments of the clergy or the bishops. Such a practice of a state church would damage the Church itself. In England e.g. the State is governing the Church of England. Such an influence of the State can corrupt spiritually and theologically the church, so it is better to be free from such an established state church.’ (Athanasius Schneider in England)

“Ecumenism is necessary to be in order with our separated brethren.”

Ah, the great “hope” of semi-traditionalists and the resist while recognize crowd is completely wrong as Pope Pius XI specifically condemned the principle that irreligion could be fought with something akin to a pan-Christian federation:

Is it not right, it is often repeated, indeed, even consonant with duty, that all who invoke the name of Christ should abstain from mutual reproaches and at long last be united in mutual charity? Who would dare to say that he loved Christ, unless he worked with all his might to carry out the desires of Him, Who asked His Father that His disciples might be "one." And did not the same Christ will that His disciples should be marked out and distinguished from others by this characteristic, namely that they loved one another: "By this shall all men know that you are my disciples, if you have love one for another"? All Christians, they add, should be as "one": for then they would be much more powerful in driving out the pest of irreligion, which like a serpent daily creeps further and becomes more widely spread, and prepares to rob the Gospel of its strength. These things and others that class of men who are known as pan-Christians continually repeat and amplify; and these men, so far from being quite few and scattered, have increased to the dimensions of an entire class, and have grouped themselves into widely spread societies, most of which are directed by non-Catholics, although they are imbued with varying doctrines concerning the things of faith. This undertaking is so actively promoted as in many places to win for itself the adhesion of a number of citizens, and it even takes possession of the minds of very many Catholics and allures them with the hope of bringing about such a union as would be agreeable to the desires of Holy Mother Church, who has indeed nothing more at heart than to recall her erring sons and to lead them back to her bosom. But in reality beneath these enticing words and blandishments lies hid a most grave error, by which the foundations of the Catholic faith are completely destroyed. (Pope Pius XI, Mortalium Animos, January 6, 1928.)

So much for Athanasius Schneider’s “orthodoxy” on fighting paganism with false ecumenism.

Schneider was also wrong in condemning an established state church as the Catholic Church was the state church of England prior to 1534, at which time King Henry VIII created a false church, the Anglican sect, to control the process of the Anglican clergy. King Henry VIII thus corrupted the principle of the cooperation between Church and State that existed, albeit not without a good deal of conflict in many areas even during the High Middle Ages, that recognized the respective autonomous spheres of each as Holy Mother Church exercised her Divinely-given right to assure that the common temporal good is pursued in the furtherance of man’s Last End, the possession of the glory of the Beatific Vision of God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost for all eternity in Heaven.

Athanasius Schneider’s rejection of a confessional state church is contrary to Catholic doctrine. It appears that he has never read, among other papal condemnations of the separation of Church and State, Paragraph Three of Pope Saint Pius X’s Vehementer Nos, February 11, 1906:

Athanasius Schneider had better bone up on the authentic social teaching of the Catholic before he makes any more bonehead statements supporting false ecumenism and separation of Church and State.

That the State must be separated from the Church is a thesis absolutely false, a most pernicious error. Based, as it is, on the principle that the State must not recognize any religious cult, it is in the first place guilty of a great injustice to God; for the Creator of man is also the Founder of human societies, and preserves their existence as He preserves our own. We owe Him, therefore, not only a private cult, but a public and social worship to honor Him. Besides, this thesis is an obvious negation of the supernatural order. It limits the action of the State to the pursuit of public prosperity during this life only, which is but the proximate object of political societies; and it occupies itself in no fashion (on the plea that this is foreign to it) with their ultimate object which is man's eternal happiness after this short life shall have run its course. But as the present order of things is temporary and subordinated to the conquest of man's supreme and absolute welfare, it follows that the civil power must not only place no obstacle in the way of this conquest, but must aid us in effecting it. The same thesis also upsets the order providentially established by God in the world, which demands a harmonious agreement between the two societies. Both of them, the civil and the religious society, although each exercises in its own sphere its authority over them. It follows necessarily that there are many things belonging to them in common in which both societies must have relations with one another. Remove the agreement between Church and State, and the result will be that from these common matters will spring the seeds of disputes which will become acute on both sides; it will become more difficult to see where the truth lies, and great confusion is certain to arise. Finally, this thesis inflicts great injury on society itself, for it cannot either prosper or last long when due place is not left for religion, which is the supreme rule and the sovereign mistress in all questions touching the rights and the duties of men. Hence the Roman Pontiffs have never ceased, as circumstances required, to refute and condemn the doctrine of the separation of Church and State. (Pope Saint Pius X, Vehementer Nos, February 11, 1906.)

By the way, one of the correlative proofs of how the conciliar "popes" have defected from the Catholic Faith is that they have done what our true Roman Pontiffs have never ceased to do, to "refute and condemn the doctrine of the separation of Church and State. To refresh your memories on this point, please see Mocking Pope Saint Pius X and Our Lady of Fatima.

Athanasius Schneider had better bone up on the authentic social teaching of the Catholic before he makes any more bonehead statements supporting false ecumenism and separation of Church and State.

Moreover, his vouching for the “beautiful doctrine” of “Pope Francis” demonstrates that Athanasius Schneider is either intellectually dishonest or completely unaware of the fact that his supposed “pope” denies Catholic doctrine and blasphemes Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Chirst and His Most Blessed Mother regularly.

Given the limited amount of time available now, suffice it to provide just one “slight” example of Jorge Mario Bergoglio’s heterodoxy about which the likes of Athanasius Schneider or Stanislaw Gadecki have not uttered even one word of protest or criticism:

247. We hold the Jewish people in special regard because their covenant with God has never been revoked, for “the gifts and the call of God are irrevocable” (Rom 11:29). The Church, which shares with Jews an important part of the sacred Scriptures, looks upon the people of the covenant and their faith as one of the sacred roots of her own Christian identity (cf. Rom 11:16-18). As Christians, we cannot consider Judaism as a foreign religion; nor do we include the Jews among those called to turn from idols and to serve the true God (cf. 1 Thes 1:9). With them, we believe in the one God who acts in history, and with them we accept his revealed word.

248. Dialogue and friendship with the children of Israel are part of the life of Jesus’ disciples. The friendship which has grown between us makes us bitterly and sincerely regret the terrible persecutions which they have endured, and continue to endure, especially those that have involved Christians.

249. God continues to work among the people of the Old Covenant and to bring forth treasures of wisdom which flow from their encounter with his word. For this reason, the Church also is enriched when she receives the values of Judaism. While it is true that certain Christian beliefs are unacceptable to Judaism, and that the Church cannot refrain from proclaiming Jesus as Lord and Messiah, there exists as well a rich complementarity which allows us to read the texts of the Hebrew Scriptures together and to help one another to mine the riches of God’s word. We can also share many ethical convictions and a common concern for justice and the development of peoples. (Jorge Mario Bergoglio, Evangelii Gaudium, November 26, 2013.)

"Pope Francis" chose to have this "apostolic exhortation" published in the December, 2013, edition of the Acta Apostolicae Sedis.

Here are the three passages as found in the Italian language (not Latin, by the way!) in the Acta Apostolicae Sedis as it is published in its conciliar captivity:

247. Uno sguardo molto speciale si rivolge al popolo ebreo, la cui Alleanza con Dio non è mai stata revocata, perché “i doni e la chiamata di Dio sono irrevocabili” (Rm 11, 29). La Chiesa, che condivide con l’Ebraismo una parte importante delle Sacre Scritture, considera il popolo dell’Alleanza e la sua fede come una radice sacra della propria identità cristiana (cfr Rm 11, 16-18). Come cristiani non possiamo considerare l’Ebraismo come una religione estranea, né includiamo gliebrei tra quanti sono chiamati ad abbandonare gli idoli per convertirsi al vero Dio (cfr 1 Ts 1, 9). Crediamo insieme con loro nell’unico Dio che agisce nella storia, e accogliamo con loro la comune Parola rivelata.

248. Il dialogo e l’amicizia con i figli d’Israele sono parte della vita dei discepoli di Gesù. L’affetto che si è sviluppato ci porta sinceramene ed amaramente a dispiacerci per le terribili persecuzioni di cui furono e sono oggetto, particolarmente per quelle che coinvolgono o hanno coinvolto cristiani.

249. Dio continua ad operare nel popolo dell’Antica Alleanza e fa nascere tesori di saggezza che scaturiscono dal suo incontro con la Parola divina. Per questo anche la Chiesa si arricchisce quando raccoglie i valori dell’Ebraismo. Sebbene alcune convinzioni cristiane siano inaccettabili per l’Ebraismo, e la Chiesa non possa rinunciare ad annunciare Gesù come Signore e Messia, esiste una ricca complementarietà che ci permette di leggere insieme i testi della Bibbia ebraica e aiutarci vicendevolmente a scerare le ricchezze della Parola, come pure di condividere molte convinzioni etiche e la comune preoccupazione per la giustizia e lo sviluppo dei popoli. (Data presso San Pietro, alla chiusura dell’Anno della fede, il 24 novembre, Solennità i i. S. Gesù Cristo Re dell’Universo, dell’anno 2013, primo del mio Pontificato. Acta Apostolicae Sedis, December, 2013.)

If one professes belief that a particular claimant to the Throne of Saint Peter is legitimate and is indeed the Vicar of Christ on earth, a matter about which no Catholic is free to err or to profess indifference, then one must accept as binding upon his conscience and beyond all criticism even Evangelii Gaudium as part of the Universal Ordinary Magisterium of the Catholic Church without complaint, reservation or qulification of any kind.

Well, "Cardinal" Burke, is the Mosaic Covenant still valid? Has it never been revoked? You must agree with your "pope's" statement as you have not criticized him at all for having made it and caused it to be published in the Acta Apostolicae Sedis. Why the silence on this point of doctrine?

Obviously, Jorge Mario Bergoglio's "teaching" on the Jews is heretical, and it is in this and in so many other ways that he shows himself to be a perfect disciple of the falsehoods promulgated by the authority of his predecessors since the death of Pope Pius XII on October 9, 1958. Jorge Mario Bergolio lacks the Catholic Faith, He has openly denied Catholic doctrine on this subject with great boldness. Although he style is more vulgar, visceral profane that those who have perceded him, he is, of course, merely following those before him who have denied, whether implicitly or explicitly, the Catholic truth about the Old Covenant that was summarized so clearly by Pope Pius XII in Mystici Corporis, June 29, 1943:

28.That He completed His work on the gibbet of the Cross is the unanimous teaching of the holy Fathers who assert that the Church was born from the side of our Savior on the Cross like a new Eve, mother of all the living. [28] "And it is now," says the great St. Ambrose, speaking of the pierced side of Christ, "that it is built, it is now that it is formed, it is now that is .... molded, it is now that it is created . . . Now it is that arises a spiritual house, a holy priesthood." [29] One who reverently examines this venerable teaching will easily discover the reasons on which it is based.

29.And first of all, by the death of our Redeemer, the New Testament took the place of the Old Law which had been abolished; then the Law of Christ together with its mysteries, enactments, institutions, and sacred rites was ratified for the whole world in the blood of Jesus Christ. For, while our Divine Savior was preaching in a restricted area -- He was not sent but to the sheep that were lost of the house of Israel [30] -the Law and the Gospel were together in force; [31] but on the gibbet of his death Jesus made void the Law with its decrees, [32] fastened the handwriting of the Old Testament to the Cross, [33] establishing the New Testament in His blood shed for the whole human race. [34] "To such an extent, then," says St. Leo the Great, speaking of the Cross of our Lord, "was there effected a transfer from the Law to the Gospel, from the Synagogue to the Church, from many sacrifices to one Victim, that, as our Lord expired, that mystical veil which shut off the innermost part of the temple and its sacred secret was rent violently from top to bottom." [35]

30. On the Cross then the Old Law died, soon to be buried and to be a bearer of death, [36] in order to give way to the New Testament of which Christ had chosen the Apostles as qualified ministers; [37] and although He had been constituted the Head of the whole human family in the womb of the Blessed Virgin, it is by the power of the Cross that our Savior exercises fully the office itself of Head in His Church. "For it was through His triumph on the Cross," according to the teaching of the Angelic and Common Doctor, "that He won power and dominion over the gentiles"; [38] by that same victory He increased the immense treasure of graces, which, as He reigns in glory in heaven, He lavishes continually on His mortal members it was by His blood shed on the Cross that God's anger was averted and that all the heavenly gifts, especially the spiritual graces of the New and Eternal Testament, could then flow from the fountains of our Savior for the salvation of men, of the faithful above all; it was on the tree of the Cross, finally, that He entered into possession of His Church, that is, of all the members of His Mystical Body; for they would not have been united to this Mystical Body. (Pope Pius XII, Mystici Corporis, June 29, 1943.)

Pope Pius XII's Mystici Corporis was inserted into the Acta Apostolicae Sedis in 1943. Although it was nothing new whatsoever, Pope Pius XII reaffirmed an irreformable teaching that is part of the Sacred Deposit of Faith. The fact that Jorge Mario Bergoglio chose to insert a contrary teaching into the Acta Apostlicae Sedis shows that he is, in perfect communion of mind and heart with his predecessors, a heretic who is outside of the bosom of the Catholic Church, an imposter on the Throne of Saint Peter.

Beautiful doctrine, Athanasius Schneider?

Would you like to “walk” that one back just a bit?

Here is a prediction, perhaps erroneous, about the farce at the Aula Paolo Sicko that is ending its first full week of melodrama: there will be no schism. The “conservative” “bishops” and their false opposites in the Jacobin/Bolshevik camp will go home to put their own “spin” on the developments, agreeing to coexist with each other in a spirit of the miserable Anglican sect.

That is, countless have been the times when “Anglo-Catholic” non-bishops have huffed and puffed about the descent into abject moral relativism on the part of their “low church” compatriots in schism, heresy and theological relativism. In the end, however, the “Anglo-Catholic” non-bishops have, at least for the most part, stayed in the so-called “Worldwide Anglican Communion” despite their temper tantrums. No one among the corps of Girondist/Menshevik conciliar revolutionaries is going to “break communion” with their currently reigning false “pontiff.” There will be strong words of protest, to be sure. In the end, however, the “conservative” conciliar revolutionaries are just as feckless as are those who constitute the organized crime family of the false opposite of the naturalist “right” in the Republican Party.

This calls to mind once again Gilbert Keith Chesterton’s observation about the respective jobs of progressives and conservatives:

The whole modern world has divided itself into Conservatives and Progressives. The business of Progressives is to go on making mistakes. The business of Conservatives is to prevent mistakes from being corrected. Even when the revolutionist might himself repent of his revolution, the traditionalist is already defending it as part of his tradition. Thus we have two great types—the advanced person who rushes us into ruin, and the retrospective person who admires the ruins. He admires them especially by moonlight, not to say moonshine. Each new blunder of the progressive or prig becomes instantly a legend of immemorial antiquity for the snob. This is called the balance, or mutual check, in our Constitution. (Gilbert Keith Chesterton, London Illustrated Review, April 24, 1924.)

The “conservative” revolutionaries within the “hierarchy” of the counterfeit church of conciliarism have hunkered down on the issue of the Sixth and Ninth Commandments after long ago making their “peace” with the acceptance of the “good” that is said to exist within false religious sects. Some have even learned to be silent about the Holy Name of the Divine Redeemer, Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, when in the presence of Talmudists or Mohammedans or Hindus or Buddhists or other sorts of pagans.

Moreover, none of the supposed “defenders” of the Sixth and Ninth Commandments at the Aula Paolo Sicko in Rome at this time has uttered a word of criticism about the nondenominational “prayer” that was recited by their “pope,” Jorge Mario Bergoglio, at “Ground Zero” in the Borough of Manhattan of the City of New York, New York, on Friday, September 25, 2015:

Consider, for example, the prayer that was prayed by a putative “pope” at “Ground Zero” in the Borough of Manhattan, City of New York, New York, yesterday, September 25, 2015:

O God of love, compassion, and healing, look on us, people of many different faiths and traditions, who gather today at this site, the scene of incredible violence and pain.

We ask you in your goodness to give eternal light and peace to all who died here— the heroic first-responders: our fire fighters, police officers, emergency service workers, and Port Authority personnel, along with all the innocent men and women who were victims of this tragedy simply because their work or service brought them here on September 11, 2001.

We ask you, in your compassion to bring healing to those who, because of their presence here that day, suffer from injuries and illness. Heal, too, the pain of still-grieving families and all who lost loved ones in this tragedy. Give them strength to continue their lives with courage and hope.

We are mindful as well of those who suffered death, injury, and loss on the same day at the Pentagon and in Shanksville, Pennsylvania. Our hearts are one with theirs as our prayer embraces their pain and suffering.

God of peace, bring your peace to our violent world: peace in the hearts of all men and women and peace among the nations of the earth. Turn to your way of love those whose hearts and minds are consumed with hatred.

God of understanding, overwhelmed by the magnitude of this tragedy, we seek your light and guidance as we confront such terrible events. Grant that those whose lives were spared may live so that the lives lost here may not have been lost in vain. Comfort and console us, strengthen us in hope, and give us the wisdom and courage to work tirelessly for a world where true peace and love reign among nations and in the hearts of all. (Prayer Service at Ground Zero, Sunday, April 20, 2008, text from the conciliar Vatican website .)

No, that link is no mistake. The text above was prayed by the great violator of the First and Second Commandments named Joseph Alois Ratzinger/Benedict XVI on Sunday, April 20, 2008, the Fourth Sunday after Easter.

Compare the supposed “restorer of tradition’s” prayer that omitted the Holy Name of Jesus to that used yesterday in the same venue by Jorge Mario Bergoglio:

O God of love, compassion, and healing, look on us, people of many different faiths and traditions, who gather today at this site, the scene of incredible violence and pain.

Yes, it was the same prayer.

This leads to a very interesting dilemma for those who held their tongues as the man who had issued Summorum Pontificum nine and one-half previously offended God by “praying” without referencing Our Lord Jesus Christ. How can those who held their tongues about the German “New Theologian’s” apostasy be quick to condemn the Argentine Apostate for “praying” the same prayer? What’s the difference? Yes, you see, there is No Space Between Ratzinger and Bergoglio: So Close in Apostasy, So Far From Catholic Truth.

Stanislaw Gadecki and Athanasius Schneider have not said anything about this prayer?

Well, then again, how can they do so as had been uttered by supposedly “orthodox” Joseph Alois Ratzinger/Benedict XVI eighty-nine months previously?

Yes, “conservative” revolutionaries such as Messrs. Gadecki and Schneider and Raymond Leo Burke, who is not a participant at the current exercise in situation ethics taking place in Rome, have been and continue to be perfectly silent about offenses committed against the Most Blessed Trinity by one conciliar “pope” after another, They have kept their mouths shut as conciliar “popes” have been afraid to uttered

the Holy Name of the Divine Redeemer, Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, in public.

The very “pope” Messrs. Gadecki, Schneider, Burke, et al, honor as a “saint,” Karol Josef Wojtyla/John Paul II, chose to be silent about the Holy Name of Jesus on a number of occasions throughout the course of his 9,666 day tenure as the universal public face of apostasy in the counterfeit church of conciliarism, including when he uttered the following so-called “prayer” in Delhi, India, on February 1, 1986, the Feast of Saint Ignatius of Antioch:

O Lord and God of all, you have willed that all your children, united by the Spirit, should live and grow together in mutual acceptance, harmony and peace. We grieve in our hearts that our human selfishness and greed have prevented your plan from being realised in our times.

We recognise that Peace is a gift from you. We also know that our collaboration as your instruments requires a wise stewardship of the earth’s resources for the true progress of all peoples. It calls for a deep respect and reverence for life and a keen appreciation of the human dignity and sacredness of conscience of every person, and a constant struggle against all forms of discrimination in law or in fact.

We commit ourselves, together with all our brothers and sisters, to cultivating a deeper awareness of your presence and action in history, to a more effective practice of truthfulness and responsibility, the ceaseless pursuit of freedom from all oppressive structures, fellowship across all barriers and justice and fullness of life for all.

Gathered in India’s Capital at this Memorial to the Father of the Nation – an outstanding and courageous witness to truth, love and non-violence – we invoke your blessings on the leaders of this country and of all nations, on the followers of all religious traditions and of all people of good will. Enable us, Lord, to live and grow as active partners with you and with one another in the common task of building a culture without violence, a world community that places its security not in the manufacture of ever more deadly weapons but in mutual trust and practical concern for a better future for all your children within a worldwide civilisation of truth, love and peace. (Prayer for peace at the conlcusion of the visit to Raj Ghat in Delhi, February 1, 1986.)

There was no mention of the Divine Redeemer, Christ the King, in Delhi, India, was there?

Where were the supposedly “Catholic” voices of Raymond Leo Burke, then a presbyter in the Diocese of La Crosse, Wisconsin, Stanislaw Gadecki, a presbyter in the Diocese of Gniezno, Poland, and Athanasius Schneider, a seminarian for the Order of the Holy Cross, then? They were oblivious to the great offense that was given to the honor, glory, and majesty of the Most Blessed Trinity, and they remain so to this very day. (Some of us who knew, however vaguely as a result of being occupied with daily work and the lack of instantly available translations about such events, that these things were wrong just shook our heads, which we quickly stuck in the sand so as to blind ourselves to the obvious: “papal” nondenominational prayers are impossible. We just wanted to make the “best” of a bad situation. We were wrong. I was wrong for far too long.)

More to the point at the present time, however, is the fact that the current crop of “conservative” “defenders” of the sanctity and inviolability of the Sacrament of Holy Matrimony remain unfazed by such acts of apostasy as exhibited by “Pope” John Paul II’s nondenominational prayer that treated the Incarnation of the Second Person of the Most Blessed Trinity in the Virginal and Immaculate Womb of His Most Blessed Mother by the power of the Third Person of the Most Blessed Trinity, God the Holy Ghost, in a completely Judeo-Masonic manner of religious indifferentism. It is more than a little cheeky for anyone to consider such men to be defenders of the Catholic Faith as (a) they themselves defect from the Faith on a number of points; and (b) they support “John Paul the Great’s” “personalist” view of the Sacrament of Holy Matrimony that invert its ends, thereby providing “justification” for the use of “natural family planning.” Some defenders of the Holy Faith.

Perhaps even more importantly, of course, the frequency of “papal” nondenominational prayers and other “ecumenical” events at the diocesan and parish levels has desensitized most Catholics who adhere to the counterfeit church of conciliarism in the tragically mistaken belief that it is perfectly acceptable in the eyes of the true God of Divine Revelation, Who hates all false religions, for putative Successor of Saint Peter to sit patiently as prayers to all manner of devils are read in his presence as occurred at “Ground Zero” on September 25, 2015.

Here is a listing of those “prayers” and of those who read them:

Hindu

Dr. Uma Mysoreka

Ms. Ishanaa Rambachan

Om...May He protect us both (gug and disciple).

May he cause us to enjoy (the Supreme).

May we both work with great energy.

May our study become brilliant.

May we not hate each other.

Om...peace, peace, peace.

Lead me from unreal to real;

lead me from darkness To light

lead me from death to immortality.

Om...peace, peace, peace. (Let There Be Blasphemy on Earth, and Let It Begin With Jorge.)

Oy! That's what I have got to say. Oy!

Well, I suppose that I should let Saint Francis Xavier, one of the original members of Saint Ignatius of Loyola's Company of Jesus, have a word or two concerning his delight in watching his converts destroy the temples of the false gods of the Hindus in India.

Saint Francis described his work in Goa--and the effects of paganism on the people there--in letters he sent to his superiors in Rome:

As to the numbers who become Christians, you may understand them from this, that it often happens to me to be hardly able to use my hands from the fatigue of baptizing: often in a single day I have baptized whole villages. Sometimes I have lost my voice and strength altogether with repeating again and again the Credo and the other forms. The fruit that is reaped by the baptism of infants, as well as by the instruction of children and others, is quite incredible. These children, I trust heartily, by the grace of God, will be much better than their fathers. They show an ardent love for the Divine law, and an extraordinary zeal for learning our holy religion and imparting it to others. Their hatred for idolatry is marvellous. They get into feuds with the heathen about it, and whenever their own parents practise it, they reproach them and come off to tell me at once. Whenever I hear of any act of idolatrous worship, I go to the place with a large band of these children, who very soon load the devil with a greater amount of insult and abuse than he has lately received of honor and worship from their parents, relations, and acquaintances. The children run at the idols, upset them, dash them down, break them to pieces, spit on them, trample on them, kick them about, and in short heap on them every possible outrage. (St. Francis Xavier: Letter from India, to the Society of Jesus at Rome, 1543.)

We have in these parts a class of men among the pagans who are called Brahmins. They keep up the worship of the gods, the superstitious rites of religion, frequenting the temples and taking care of the idols. They are as perverse and wicked a set as can anywhere be found, and I always apply to them the words of holy David, "from an unholy race and a wicked and crafty man deliver me, O Lord." They are liars and cheats to the very backbone. Their whole study is, how to deceive most cunningly the simplicity and ignorance of the people. They give out publicly that the gods command certain offerings to be made to their temples, which offerings are simply the things that the Brahmins themselves wish for, for their own maintenance and that of their wives, children, and servants. Thus they make the poor folk believe that the images of their gods eat and drink, dine and sup like men, and some devout persons are found who really offer to the idol twice a day, before dinner and supper, a certain sum of money. The Brahmins eat sumptuous meals to the sound of drums, and make the ignorant believe that the gods are banqueting. When they are in need of any supplies, and even before, they give out to the people that the gods are angry because the things they have asked for have not been sent, and that if the people do not take care, the gods will punish them by slaughter, disease, and the assaults of the devils. And the poor ignorant creatures, with the fear of the gods before them, obey them implicitly. These Brahmins have barely a tincture of literature, but they make up for their poverty in learning by cunning and malice. Those who belong to these parts are very indignant with me for exposing their tricks. Whenever they talk to me with no one by to hear them they acknowledge that they have no other patrimony but the idols, by their lies about which they procure their support from the people. They say that I, poor creature as I am, know more than all of them put together.

They often send me a civil message and presents, and make a great complaint when I send them all back again. Their object is to bribe me to connive at their evil deeds. So they declare that they are convinced that there is only one God, and that they will pray to Him for me. And I, to return the favor, answer whatever occurs to me, and then lay bare, as far as I can, to the ignorant people whose blind superstitions have made them their slaves, their imposture and tricks, and this has induced many to leave the worship of the false gods, and eagerly become Christians. If it were not for the opposition of the Brahmins, we should have them all embracing the religion of Jesus Christ. (St. Francis Xavier: Letter from India, to the Society of Jesus at Rome, 1543.)

My own and only Father in the Heart of Christ, I think that the many letters from this place which have lately been sent to Rome will inform you how prosperously the affairs of religion go on in these parts, through your prayers and the good bounty of God. But there seem to be certain things which I ought myself to speak about to you; so I will just touch on a few points relating to these parts of the world which are so distant from Rome. In the first place, the whole race of the Indians, as far as I have been able to see, is very barbarous; and it does not like to listen to anything that is not agreeable to its own manners and customs, which, as I say, are barbarous. It troubles itself very little to learn anything about divine things and things which concern salvation. Most of the Indians are of vicious disposition, and are adverse to virtue. Their instability, levity, and inconstancy of mind are incredible; they have hardly any honesty, so inveterate are their habits of sin and cheating. We have hard work here, both in keeping the Christians up to the mark and in converting the heathen. And, as we are your children, it is fair that on this account you should take great care of us and help us continually by your prayers to God. You know very well what a hard business it is to teach people who neither have any knowledge of God nor follow reason, but think it a strange and intolerable thing to be told to give up their habits of sin, which have now gained all the force of nature by long possession. Saint Francis Xavier, Letter on the Missions, to St. Ignatius de Loyola, 1549.)

Saint Francis worked as a Catholic, not as a conciliar revolutionary who believes that the Catholic Church and false religions that worship the devil must "peacefully coexist." He would not have sat back idly at the "temple of doom" that is the hideous "Ground Zero" memorial where the Cross of the Divine Redeemer is not to be found. Saint Francis Xavier would have excoriated everyone there, including the lay Jesuit revolutionary, Jorge Mario Bergoglio.

All right, back to the invocations to the devils:

Buddhist

Reverend Yasuko Niwano

Bhante Hennbunne Kondañña

Victory begets enmity;

the defeated dwell in pain;

the peaceful live happily

Discarding both victory and defeat.

One should not do any slight wrong

Which the wise might censure,

May all beings be happy and secure!

May all beings have happy minds! (Let There Be Blasphemy on Earth, and Let It Begin With Jorge.)

A slight interjection at this point.

“May all beings have happy minds”?’

Well, this was certainly “music” to apostate ears of Jorge Mario Bergoglio and the happy “bishop”, who was with him, Timothy Michael Dolan, the conciliar “archbishop” of New York.

“May all beings have happy minds”?

Back to the listing of prayers to the devils.

Sikh

Dr. Satpal Singh

Dr. Gunisha Kaur

God judges us according to our deeds, not the coat

that we wear: that Truth is above everything, and the

highest deed is truthful living. Know that we attain

God when we love, and only that victory endures,

in consequence of which no one is defeated. (Let There Be Blasphemy on Earth, and Let It Begin With Jorge.)

“No one is defeated?

Consider the words of the great defender of the City of Mary Immaculate, Father Maximilian Kolbe:

“In other words” Saint Maximilian insisted, “there is no greater enemy of the Immaculata and her Knighthood than today’s ecumenism, which every Knight must not only fight against, but also neutralize through diametrically opposed action and ultimately destroy. We must realize the goal of the Militia Immaculata as quickly as possible: that is, to conquer the whole world, and every individual soul which exists today or will exist until the end of the world, for the Immaculata, and through her for the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus.” (Father Karl Stehlin, Immaculata, Our Ideal, Kansas City, Missouri, Angelus Press, 2007, p. 37.)

Father Kolbe knew that Our Lady wanted to defeat false ecumenism. Each of the conciliar revolutionaries, including the so-called “defenders” of the Sacrament of Holy Matrimony within the counterfeit church of conciliarism, are as one with Bergoglio and his equally heretical predecessors in promoting false ecumenism.

Isn’t this clear by now?

Well, here comes a nondenominational Christian reflection that was read by two Protestants, and that’s a statement given the fact that the man known as “Pope Francis” did not even give any indication that there was such a thing as Christianity when he spoke at “Ground Zero” fifteen days ago:

Nondenominational Christian

Archbishop Demetrios

Reverend A.R. Bernard, Sr.

Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom

of heaven. Blessed are those who mourn, for they shall

be comforted. Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit

the earth. Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for

righteousness, for they shall be satisfied. Blessed are

the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy. Blessed are

the pure in heart, for they shall see God. Blessed are

the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God.

Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness’

sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. (Let There Be Blasphemy on Earth, and Let It Begin With Jorge.)

Well, this is a corrupted version of Our Lord Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ’s Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5: 1-10) that did not identify Our Lord and most conveniently omits verses eleven and twelve, which qualifiy verse ten.

Here is the Douay-Rheims translation of the Latin Vulgate, including verse eleven:

[1] And seeing the multitudes, he went up into a mountain, and when he was set down, his disciples came unto him. [2] And opening his mouth, he taught them, saying: [3] Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. [4] Blessed are the meek: for they shall possess the land. [5] Blessed are they that mourn: for they shall be comforted.

[11] Blessed are ye when they shall revile you, and persecute you, and speak all that is evil against you, untruly, for my sake: [12] Be glad and rejoice, for your reward is very great in heaven. (Matthew 5: 1-12.)

Those who died on September 11, 2001, were not persecuted for the sake of Our Lord Jesus Christ. They were victims of a tragic set of events. Their immortal souls are in need of our prayers. The Sermon on the Mount is not about what happened on September 11, 2001, and to omit the fact that one is blessed when he is reviled and persecuted for the sake of Christ the King is simply inexcusable. The sad part of this is, of course, that the recitation of the corrupted version of the Sermon on the Mount was as “Christian” as things got at “Ground Zero” as the Mohammedans and Talmudists closed out the “prayer service” before Jorge gave a Judeo-Masonic address:

Mohammeda

Imam Khalid Latif

Dr. Sarah Sayeed

O Allah! You are Peace, and All Peace is from You; and all

Peace returns to You. Grant us to live with the salutation

of peace, and lead us to your abode of Peace. You are

blessed, our Lord, and Exalted, O Owner of Magnificence

and Honor!

Talmudic

SUNG BY CANTOR AZI SCHWARTZ

Jewish Prayer in Honor of the Deceased

G-d, full of compassion, Who dwells on high,

grant true rest upon the wings of the Shechinah,

in the exalted spheres of the holy and pure,

who shine as the resplendence of the firmament,

to the souls of Victims of September 11th

who [have] gone to their eternal home;

may their place of rest be in Gan Eden.

Therefore, may the All-Merciful One

shelter them with the cover of His wings forever,

and bind their souls in the bond of life.

The Lord is their heritage; may they rest in peace;

and let us say: Amen. (Let There Be Blasphemy on Earth, and Let It Begin With Jorge.)

No, not one mention of the Holy Name of Jesus.

Not one.

Where are the likes of Stanislaw Gadecki, Athanasius Schneider, and Raymond Leo Burke now that they have been elevated to positions of prominence that they did not have in 1986 when “Saint John Paul II” was offending the honor, glory and majesty of the Most Blessed Trinity on a seemingly endless basis while globetrotting all over the world?

These poor men are trying to fight a “rear guard” effort to “defend” the “purity” of Catholic doctrine on the Sacrament of Holy Matrimony that they have helped to undermine and corrupt by their acceptance of the false, revolutionary principles contained in Giovanni Battista Enrico Antonio Maria Montini/Paul the Sick’s Humanae Vitae, July 25, 1968, and “Saint John Paul II’s” and “Blessed” Mother Teresa’s” ceaseless exhortations in behalf of “natural family planning.” It is impossible for anyone to defend part of the patrimony of the Catholic Faith when he accepts offenses against the very nature and glory of the Most Blessed Trinity and when he himself supports a teaching on Holy Matrimony that is false and thus contrary to the good of souls, both temporally and eternally.

Yes, it is tough business being a “conservative” or a “traditionally-minded” Catholic in the structures of the counterfeit church of conciliarism as a putative “pope” delivers an “Oprah Winfrey” soliloquy to provide Judeo-Masonic “comfort” to those whose family members, friends and coworkers were killed in the former Twin Towers of the World Trade Center on Tuesday, September 11, 2001.

Jorge did not mention Christ the King or His Holy Cross at any point on Friday, September 25, 2015, no less to beg for prayers for the souls of those Catholics who might as yet be detained in Purgatory as none of those killed fourteen years ago died for the Holy Faith and are not to be heroized as martyrs of It.

This fact takes nothing away from the fact that there was heroism displayed by many who were killed or injured in the Twin Towers on Tuesday, September 11, 2001, both on the part of those who worked in the buildings and, of course, on the part ofthe first responders. Such bravery, however, is not martyrdom, and thus the souls of those who were killed that day are in need of our prayers, noting that General Absolution was administered at the scene by at least two true priests, including the late Father Benedict Groeschel, C.F.R., and the late Father Mychal Judge, O.F.M. Nevertheless, however, we pray for the souls of the dead and for the needs of their families.

Bergoglio, of course, was not in the least bit concerned about anyone dying for the Catholic Faith. He is a Judeo-Masonic sentimentalist, and a review of his "Orpah Winfrey"-type remarks fifteen days ago proves this to be the case:

I feel many different emotions standing here at Ground Zero, where thousands of lives were taken in a senseless act of destruction. Here grief is palpable. The water we see flowing towards that empty pit reminds us of all those lives which fell prey to those who think that destruction, tearing down, is the only way to settle conflicts. It is the silent cry of those who were victims of a mindset which knows only violence, hatred and revenge. A mindset which can only cause pain, suffering, destruction and tears.

The flowing water is also a symbol of our tears. Tears at so much devastation and ruin, past and present. This is a place where we shed tears, we weep out of a sense of helplessness in the face of injustice, murder, and the failure to settle conflicts through dialogue. Here we mourn the wrongful and senseless loss of innocent lives because of the inability to find solutions which respect the common good. This flowing water reminds us of yesterday’s tears, but also of all the tears still being shed today.

A few moments ago I met some of the families of the fallen first responders. Meeting them made me see once again how acts of destruction are never impersonal, abstract or merely material. They always have a face, a concrete story, names. In those family members, we see the face of pain, a pain which still touches us and cries out to heaven.

At the same time, those family members showed me the other face of this attack, the other face of their grief: the power of love and remembrance. A remembrance that does not leave us empty and withdrawn. The name of so many loved ones are written around the towers’ footprints. We can see them, we can touch them, and we can never forget them.

Here, amid pain and grief, we also have a palpable sense of the heroic goodness which people are capable of, those hidden reserves of strength from which we can draw. In the depths of pain and suffering, you also witnessed the heights of generosity and service. Hands reached out, lives were given. In a metropolis which might seem impersonal, faceless, lonely, you demonstrated the powerful solidarity born of mutual support, love and self-sacrifice. No one thought about race, nationality, neighborhoods, religion or politics. It was all about solidarity, meeting immediate needs, brotherhood. It was about being brothers and sisters. New York City firemen walked into the crumbling towers, with no concern for their own wellbeing. Many succumbed; their sacrifice enabled great numbers to be saved.

This place of death became a place of life too, a place of saved lives, a hymn to the triumph of life over the prophets of destruction and death, to goodness over evil, to reconciliation and unity over hatred and division.

In this place of sorrow and remembrance I am filled with hope, as I have the opportunity to join with leaders representing the many religious traditions which enrich the life of this great city. I trust that our presence together will be a powerful sign of our shared desire to be a force for reconciliation, peace and justice in this community and throughout the world. For all our differences and disagreements, we can experience a world of peace. In opposing every attempt to create a rigid uniformity, we can and must build unity on the basis of our diversity of languages, cultures and religions, and lift our voices against everything which would stand in the way of such unity. Together we are called to say “no” to every attempt to impose uniformity and “yes” to a diversity accepted and reconciled.

This can only happen if we uproot from our hearts all feelings of hatred, vengeance and resentment. We know that that is only possible as a gift from heaven. Here, in this place of remembrance, I would ask everyone together, each in his or her own way, to spend a moment in silence and prayer. Let us implore from on high the gift of commitment to the cause of peace. Peace in our homes, our families, our schools and our communities. Peace in all those places where war never seems to end. Peace for those faces which have known nothing but pain. Peace throughout this world which God has given us as the home of all and a home for all. Simply PEACE. Let us pray in silence.

(a moment of silence)

In this way, the lives of our dear ones will not be lives which will one day be forgotten. Instead, they will be present whenever we strive to be prophets not of tearing down but of building up, prophets of reconciliation, prophets of peace. (Interreligious encounter at the Ground Zero memorial.)

There was not one remote hint of Catholicism in any of this. Not even anything buried in a “find the hidden characters” in Highlights Magazine for Children. Bergoglio’s address at “Ground Zero” fifteen days ago was completely pagan. How can one who is a Catholic speak of suffering and death and without mentioning the Redemptive Act of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ and His Easter Victory over the power of sin and eternal death? He cannot do without betraying himself to be a blaspheming apsotate and heretic.

This calls to mind a “homily” that the late Edward “Cardinal” Egan gave at the Cathedral of Saint Patrick in the Borough of Manhattan in the City of New York, New York, on Wednesday evening, September 11, 2002, in which he mentioned the word “Lord” once without ever mentioning the Holy Name of Jesus. Indeed, Egan, who was a true priest and had a sober, priestly bearing about him, could have given the address that Bergoglio gave at ‘Ground Zero” on September 25, 2015, as he did not mention Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ when he addressed an “ecumenical” gathering at Yankee Stadium II in the Borough of the Bronx, City of New York, New York, on Sunday, September 23, 2001, emceed by one of Jorge Mario Bergoglio's own media advisers, Oprah Winfrey, and James Earl Jones, of all people, twelve days after the tragic events of September 11, 2001. Egan kept his peace about Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ in the presence of a pro-abortion Talmudic rabbi, Arthur Schneier, who blew a ram's horn (the Blowing of the Shofar), and representatives of Protestantism, Orthodoxy, Mohammedanism, Hinduism and of the Sikhs. Egan, a paragon of conciliar orthodoxy, sat as an "equal" with these charlatans. In other words, he did fourteen years ago what Bergoglio has done throughout his revolutionary presbyteral career, including on Friday, September 25, 2015.

Here is what "Cardinal" Egan prayed on September 23, 2001:

Almighty and eternal father, we are gathered here as your people and your children. Out of love you brought us into existence, out of love you fashioned each and every one of us in your own image and likeness. Thus we come to you with the greatest measure of confidence, we come to you with the greatest measure of trust. We come as well with heavy hearts for just 13 days ago our beloved city and our beloved nation were violated. We lost women and men and children whom we sorely needed, whom we greatly admired, whom we dearly cherish. In our hospitals hundreds are in pain, in our homes thousands are in mourning, and in all of us there abides an urgent need for you and your grace. Heavenly father, wrap us in your providential care. Take our deceased brothers and sisters into your divine presence forever, strengthen our injured, console our families from whom so many have been taken so brutally. And make us all here in New York, in Washington and across the length and breadth of this land your noble people, your virtuous people. Yes, Lord, your holy people. We need courage to deal with our pain, we need justice to deal with the evil doers who have harmed us so fiercely. We need faith, wisdom and strength of soul for ourselves, each and every one, for our president and those who work with him, for our governor and those who work with him, for our mayor and those who work with him, for our police officers, heroes all, for our firefighters, heroes all, for our health care and emergency workers, heroes all. Gracious God, guide us, hear us. We are yours and yours we have a wish to be. Draw us closer to you in this hour of tragedy and pain. This we beg as your children with the utmost of trust, the utmost of confidence, the utmost of love, now and forever. Amen (applause). (Yankee Stadium Prayer Service. Although he should not have been at this ecumenical travesty, it is to the credit of the conciliar "bishop" of the Diocese of Brooklyn at the time, Thomas Daily, that he did mention the name of Our Lord Jesus Christ once and did invoke Our Lady under the title of "Mary, Queen of Peace." The Armenian Orthodox bishop, Anania Arapajian, started his prayer with an invocation to Our Lord, Who was also invoked by two Protestant ministers, meaning that four speakers of twenty-seven mentioned Our Lord's Holy Name. A member of the conciliar "college of cardinals" refused to do, as did a representative of the Greek Orthodox Church in the United States of America.)

Who yet attached to the conciliar structures can criticize Edward Egan for not mentioning the Holy Name of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ?

Karol Wojtyla/John Paul II represented himself as an "equal" with representatives of false religions repeatedly throughout his false "pontificate." So did Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI. Jorge Mario Bergoglio has done so throughout his career, including during his visit to the United States of America. The staid, clerical Egan was indeed "right with" the teaching and example of the conciliar "popes", including the one who came here just six months after he died.

Silence about the Holy Name is a grave sin, especially so on the part of a priest. Jorge Mario Bergoglio is not a priest or a bishop, no less a true and legitimate Successor or Saint Peter. He is yet another anti-Saint Peter whose betrayals of Christ the King are legendary. Unlike Saint Peter, Bergoglio would have denied Our Lord as he voluntarily refrains from speaking the Holy Name of Our Lord Jesus Christ to those who reject His Sacred Divinity.

The Apostles, on the other hand, rejoiced when they were deemed worthy ill-treatment for the sake of the Holy Name of the Divine Redeemer, Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ:

And they indeed went from the presence of the council, rejoicing that they were accounted worthy to suffer reproach for the name of Jesus. And every day they ceased not in the temple, and from house to house, to teach and preach Christ Jesus. (Acts 5: 41-42.)

Bergoglio thus does voluntarily what the Sanhedrin ordered the Apostles to do under threat of death: to refrain from any public mention of the Holy Name of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ:

And calling in the apostles, after they had scourged them, they charged them that they should not speak at all in the name of Jesus; and they dismissed them. (Acts 5: 40.)

"Pope Francis" does voluntarily what the Roman emperors and other pagan potentates and barbarians and the Protestants and Freemasons and all social revolutionaries have sought to do from the time of French Revolution to the present, to keep Christ the King from reigning over nations as He is recognized as the King of individual men and of all nations on the face of this earth as He has revealed Himself exclusively to men through His Catholic Church that He founded upon the Rock of Peter, the Pope.

Anyone who thinks that what is going on in Rome is the “breaking point” for “full communion” within the counterfeit church of conciliarism ought to ask why Jorge Mario Bergoglio’s rejection of the Sixth and Ninth Commandments is clearer than his own rejection—and that of his predecessors in the “Petrine Ministry of his false religious sect—of the binding precepts of the First, Second and Third Commandments?

What can we do about all of this?

Well, we can make reparation to the Holy Face of Our Lord Jesus Christ for the crime of blasphemy and for other violations of the First, Second, and Third Commandments by praying the Golden Arrow Prayer (which is found, along with other devotions to the Holy Face, in the appendix below).

It was Our Lord Himself Who made the request of a consecrated French religious woman, Sister Mary of Saint Peter, in the Nineteenth Century to spread devotion to His Holy Face, Which was so disfigured by the sins of men, especially by sins of blasphemy and false worship.

Dorothy Scallan provided an account of the origin of the Holy Face devotion and of the Golden Arrow Prayer in her book on the life of the Venerable Leo Dupont, a layman who was known in his lifetime as The Holy Man of Tours:

Then a change occurred her mystical life. The Saviour made known to the Carmelite that he wanted something more from her than her own personal sanctification through prayer and penance. The day was August 26, 1843. Sister Marie Pierre had been at Carmel about four years. When she knelt down for the regular prayer in choir at five o'clock in the evening, the Saviour revealed to her the first of a series of communications pertaining to a special mission with which He intended to entrust her. As usual, Sister Marie Pierre set this message down in writing and turned in in to the prioress who, preoccupied with other matters, gave it but slight attention.

However, a few days later when Sister Marie Pierre returned with more written accounts of further communications on the same subject, Mother Mary of the Incarnation realized that she was faced with something that was meant to reach beyond the confines of the cloister. She therefore decided to consult some reliable person outside the convent, and turned to Leo in her difficulty. “Mr. Dupont, in the last few days something quite unusual has taken place in our Carmel. Sister Marie Pierre tells me that our Lord has given her a special assignment. He told her that He was being gravely insulted by the sin of blasphemy and that He wanted reparation.”

“Blasphemy!” repeated Leo, thoughtfully. “What exactly did our Lord say?” he asked interested.

“Let me read you that written account which Sister Marie Pierre gave me, explaining precisely what transpired,” the prioress said, reaching for a sheet of paper.

“Yes, Reverend Mother, I am listening,” said Leo on the other side of the iron grating.

“Here is what the sister writes: 'Gathering the powers of my soul, Our Lord addressed me in these words: My name is everywhere blasphemed! Even children blaspheme! He made me understand that this frightful sin more that any other grievously wounds Him. By blasphemy the sinner curses Him to His Face, attacks Him openly, annuls redemption, and pronounces his own condemnation.'”

The prioress paused for a moment and then asked, “Mr. Dupont, what do you think of this? To us the very word blasphemy, is frightful!”

“Yes, Mother, but there is no running away from the fact that blasphemy is rife in our midst,” replied Leo.

“Of course, you would know better than any of us in the cloister who are shut off from wordly contact. But let me read you the rest of the written account Sister Marie Pierre has given me,” the prioress said and then began to read further, “to heal the wound inflicted on the heart of the Saviour by the poisoned arrow of blasphemy, the Master offered me a prayer which He called the Golden Arrow.

The words of this short act of praise are as follows: May the most holy, most sacred, most adorable, most incomprehensible ad ineffable name of God be praised, blessed, loved, adored and glorified in heaven and on earth, by all the creatures of God, and by the Sacred Heart of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ in the most Holy Sacreament of the Altar. Amen. What do you think about this, Mr. Dupont?”

“I think the prayer is a stiking act of praise to the Holy Name of God,” at once answered Leo who saw in the Golden Arrow a fitting reparation for the outrages of modern free thinkers, anarchists, atheists, and fallen-away Catholics.

“But let me tell you the rest, Mr. Dupont. According to Sister Marie Pierre, our Lord charges her to see to it that news of this revelation be given out to the public and that the 'Golden Arrow' be printed on leaflets and distributed so that people can recite this prayer in reparation for blasphemy.” explained the prioress.

“Well, in a case of that kind,” replied Leo, thoughtfully, “where distribution of printed prayers is involved, we shall need the approval of His Excellency, Archbishop Morlot. There may be delays and difficulties . . . “

Precisely, and according to Sister Marie Pierre, our Saviour already warned her that she would have a great deal to suffer in this work entrusted to her that the more agreeable anything is to God the more bitter does Satan try to make it, that thereby the soul may be disgusted and give way to discouragement.”

Leo listened attentively but said nothing, and the prioress went on, “But our Lord also assure Sister Marie Pierre that although Satan would do everything in his power to annihilate the work, his efforts would be in vain.”

“Mother, it seems you kept the most consoling part for the end,” Leo said cheerfully, but the prioress pressed on for a conclusion.

“Mr. Dupont, how shall we commence? Would you have some sort of plan?”

“Plan? But Mother, don't you see that deciding on a plan in this Work has not been left to our individual choice?”

“What do you mean?”

“Simply that our Lord Himself outlined a plan. He designated the press to be the means of establishing the Work! Isn't that right?”

“Yes, Sister said that our Lord told her expressly to have the prayers of reparation printed and distributed!” agreed the prioress.

“But to print and distribute these leaflets, we must first secure the Archbishop's permission,” countered Leo.

“Why do you think so?”

“I think it will be difficult because I know that the world loves flattery and dislikes correction. Because Sister Marie Pierre's revelation point a finger of blame at the sins of our modern society, it will require a good deal of fortitue not to shy away from making this message known.”

“Yet, we must do it. Mr. Dupont, do you think you could lay the matter before the Archbishop at your convenience?” the prioress asked hestitatingly.

“Well, Mother, I may as well tell you that I'm not accustomed to paying visits to bishops. However, if in the last resort it should devolve on me to make this errand, I will certainly not refuse. But if I may say so, I think the convent's spiritual director ought to be the person to carry this matter to His Excellency.”

In three months that followed nothing was done to further the work of reparation. The matter was kept secret inside and outside the convent. Only the religious superiors and leo and a few intimate friend of Carmel knew anything about it. However, Sister Marie Pierre in the meanfime plunger herself deeply in the new Work.

“Since that communication, my soul is completely changed, she wrote in her diary. “Our Lord has inspired me to add to the 'Golden Arrow” some other prayers of reparation, and He has condescended to let me know that He accepted this exercise . . . “

Then, after Communion on the Feast of St. Jon of the Cross, November 24, Sister Marie Pierre received another revelation concerning the new Work. As soon as Jesus had entered my soul, He made me hear these words: Until now, I have shown you only in part the designs of My Heart, but today I will reveal them to you in in all their fulness. The earth is covered with crimes, this violation of the First Three Commandments of God has irritated My Father; the Holy Name of God blasphemed, and the Holy Day of the Lord profaned fills up the measure of iniquities; these sins have risen unto the Throne of God and provoked His wrath, which will soon burst forth, if His justice be not appeased; at no time have these crimes reached such a pitch! I desire and most ardently, that there be formed, to honor the Name of My Father, and Association, properly approved and organized. Your superiors are right in not wishing to take any steps concerning this devotion but such as are well based, for otherwise My designs would not be fulfilled. Then I said; 'Ah, if I did but know beyond a doubt that it was Thyself who has spoken to me, it would not be so difficult to lay these things before my superiors.' He answered me: “It is for them and not for you to make this examination. To who should I address Myself it not to a Carmelite, whose very vocation enjoins upon her the duty of unceasingly glorifying My Name.” (Dorothy Scallan, The Holy Man of Tours, republished by TAN Books and Publishers, 1990, pp. 119-123.)

As has been demonstrated amply in this one commentary alone, Jorge Mario Bergoglio is among the world’s foremost transgressors of the First, Second, and Third Commandments, and he is joined at the hip in this regard by the very “conservative” revolutionaries who are seen by so many now as the “defenders” of the binding precepts of the Sixth and Ninth Commandments.

We turn to Our Lady in this time of terrible sacrilege, apostasy and blasphemy, begging her help, especially through her Most Holy Rosary in this month of October, the month of her Holy Rosary, trusting that the acts of reparation that we offer her through the Golden Arrow Prayer and her Most Holy Rosary for the blasphemies of the day will be used as she sees fit to help usher in the day when a true pope will be restored to the Throne of Saint Peter to defend, not defame, the honor, majesty and glory of the Most Blessed Trinity.

Viva Cristo Rey! Vivat Christus Rex!

Our Lady of the Rosary, pray for us.

Saint Joseph, pray for us.

Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.

Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.

Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.

Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us.

Saints Caspar, Melchior, and Balthasar, pray for us.

Saint Francis Borgia, pray for us.

Appendix

Devotions to the Holy Face of Our Lord Jesus Christ

(As found at: Holy Face Devotion.)

PRAYERS OF REPARATION TO THE HOLY FACE OF JESUS

As requested by Our Lord Jesus Christ. These prayers are to be said on Sundays and the Holy Days of Obligation, publicly (if possible), and preferably before the Blessed Sacrament or before the picture of the Holy Face.

Dear Lord, through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary, I (we) offer You these prayers in reparation for the sins which offend God the most in these modern times--the sins of BLASPHEMY and the PROFANATION OF SUNDAY and Your Holy Days of Obligation:

One Our Father, Hail Mary,
and Glory Be To The Father

THE "GOLDEN ARROW" PRAYER
dictated by Our Lord to Sister Mary of St. Peter

May the most holy, most sacred, most adorable, most incomprehensible and unutterable Name of God be always praised, blessed, loved, adored and glorified, in Heaven, on earth, and under the earth, by all the creatures of God, and by the Sacred Heart of Our Lord Jesus Christ in the Most Holy Sacrament of the Altar. Amen.

After receiving this prayer, Sister Mary of St. Peter was given a vision in which she saw the Sacred Heart of Jesus delightfully wounded by this "Golden Arrow", as torrents of graces streamed from It far the conversion of sinners.

LITANY OF THE HOLY FACE OF JESUS

    I salute Thee, I adore Thee and I love Thee, O adorable Face of Jesus, my Beloved, noble Seal of the Divinity! Outraged anew by blasphemers. I offer Thee, through the heart of Thy blessed Mother, the worship of all the Angels and Saints, most humbly beseeching Thee to repair and renew in me and in all men Thy Image disfigured by sin.

    O adorable Face which was adored, with profound respect, by Mary and Joseph when they saw Thee for the first time, have mercy on us.
    O adorable Face which did ravish with joy, in the stable of Bethlehem, the Angels, the shepherds and the magi, have mercy on us.
    O adorable Face which did transpierce with a dart of love in the Temple, the saintly old man Simeon and the prophetess Anna, have mercy on us.
    O adorable Face which filled with admiration the Doctors of the law when Thou didst appear in the Temple at the age of twelve years, have mercy on us.
    O adorable Face which possesses beauty always ancient and always new, have mercy...
    O adorable Face which is the masterpiece of the Holy Ghost, in which the Eternal Father is well pleased, have mercy on us.
    O adorable Face which is the ineffable mirror of the divine perfection, have mercy on us.

Adorable Face of Jesus which was so mercifully bowed down on the Cross, on the day of Thy Passion, for the salvation of the world! Once more today in pity bend down towards us poor sinners. Cast upon us a glance of compassion and give us Thy peace.

     O adorable Face which became brilliant like the sun and radiant with glory, on the Mountain of Tabor, have mercy on us.
    O adorable Face which wept and was troubled at the tomb of Lazarus, have mercy on us.
    O adorable Face which was rendered sad at the sight of Jerusalem, and shed tears on that ungrateful city, have mercy on us.
    O adorable Face which was bowed down to the ground in the Garden of Olives, and covered with confusion for our sins, have mercy on us.
    O adorable Face which was covered with the sweat of blood, have mercy on us.
    O adorable Face which was struck by a vile servant, covered with a veil of shame, and profaned by the sacrilegious hands of Thy enemies, have mercy on us.
    O adorable Face which by Its divine glance, wounded the heart of St. Peter with a dart of sorrow and love, have mercy on us.

Be merciful to us, O my God! Do not reject our prayers, when in the midst of our afflictions, we call upon Thy Holy Name and seek with love and confidence Thy adorable Face.

    O adorable Face which was washed and anointed by Mary and the holy women and covered with a shroud, have mercy on us.
    O adorable Face which was all resplendent with glory and beauty on the day of the Resurrection, have mercy on us.
    O adorable Face which is hidden in the Eucharist, have mercy on us.
    O adorable Face which will appear at the end of time in the clouds with great power and great majesty, have mercy on us.
    O adorable Face which will make sinners tremble, have mercy on us.
    O adorable Face which will fill the just with joy for all eternity, have mercy on us.
    O adorable Face which merits all our reverence, our homage and our adoration, have mercy on us.
    O Lord, show us Thy Face, and we shall be saved!
    O Lord, show us Thy Face, and we shall be saved!
    O Lord, show us Thy Face, and we shall be saved!

Note: The Litany of the Holy Face above, and the same Litany in our pamphlets, is the abridged version, as the full version is quite lengthy. Here is the full-length Litany of the Holy Face.

PRAYER TO OFFER THE HOLY FACE OF JESUS TO GOD THE FATHER TO APPEASE HIS JUSTICE AND DRAW DOWN MERCY UPON US

Almighty and Eternal Father, since it has pleased Our Divine Savior to reveal to mankind in modern times the power residing in His Holy Face, we now avail ourselves of this Treasure in our great need. Since our Savior Himself promised that by offering to You His Holy Face disfigured in the Passion we can procure the settlement of all the affairs of our household, and that nothing whatsoever will be refused to us, we now come before Your throne.
Eternal Father, turn away Your angry gaze from our guilty people whose face has become unsightly in Your eyes. Look instead upon the Face of Your Beloved Son; for this is the Face of Him in whom You are well pleased. We now offer You His Holy Face covered with blood, sweat, dust, spittle and shame, in reparation for the worst crimes of our age, which are atheism, blasphemy, and the desecration of Your holy days. We thus hope to appease Your anger justly provoked against us. The All-Merciful Advocate opens His mouth to plead our cause; listen to His cries, behold His tears, O God, and through the merits of His Holy Face hearken to Him when He intercedes for us poor miserable sinners.

(As found at: Holy Face Devotion.)

You are here

Polluting the Atmosphere With the Smoke of Antichrist, part ten/Circus Jorge, part two

Support Christ or Chaos