Governed by Remorseless Sociopaths Intent on Death and Destruction

I know.

I know.

A sociopath is by definition remorseless in the damage that he causes to others.

I know.

However, I ask you to pardon the oxymoronic redundancy as the title I have chosen expresses the truth concerning the mendacious killers who cloak themselves in the mantle of “science” and who have the protection of being civil servants who are, at least for the most part, unanswerable to the taxpayers and contemptuous of Congress’s legitimate oversight of their legendary abuse of power and their belief in the privilege of their infallibility that makes any criticism of them and their work illegitimate and beneath contempt.

Unbeknownst to most Americans, however, is that the “deep state” sociopaths such as Anthony Facui and his ilk have deep ties to the Anti-Catholicism of the so-called “Progressive Movement” of the latter Nineteenth and early Twentieth Centuries.

The “Progressive Movement,” which is more or less synonymous with the “Good Government Movement,” began in the 1880s as many WASP (White Anglo-Saxon Protestants) elitists and secular Darwinists/social “progressives” became alarmed at the growing political influence of Catholic immigrants in urban politics. There was the fear that these immigrants and their descendants could become so influential as to have a major say in national politics and thus be able to elect a Catholic as President of the United States of America. Such an event, the “progressives” believed, would make the United States of America a vassal of Pope Leo XIII.

Those who are familiar with my own writing over the decades know that the fear of these early “progressives” was unfounded as none of the Catholic immigrants who used the ward or election district political clubs of the Democratic Party in urban areas had any intention whatsoever of converting the United States of America to become a Catholic country. They simply wanted to use the local political clubs as a means of upward social and economic mobility that was being denied to them in a systematic manner by the pronounced and sometimes overtly violent anti-Catholicism that is deeply embedded in the American soil that is manifested very clearly today by the open contempt which the current generation of “progressives” has for believing Catholics. I know. I am a target of these “progressives.” (See, for example, Believing Catholics Pose No Threat to a Just Social Order.)

It was to blunt the rise of the growing influence of Catholic immigrants from Ireland (both those who arrived in the 1820s and those who arrived in the 1840s and thereafter), Italy (especially after the overthrow of the Papal States), Hungary and other places in Central Europe during the revolutions of 1848, Germany (during the Freemason Otto von Bismarck’s Kulturkampf against Holy Mother Church), and Eastern Europe (after the War between the States as the need for skilled and unskilled labor increased during the Second Industrial Revolution) that the WASPS and their Judeo-Masonic compatriots devised various “reforms” to take as much political power as possible away from the political party bosses who controlled, if not rigged, elections and who controlled the entire process of hiring government employees and awarding contracts for the provision of various services. The hiring, retention and promotion of government employees was solely in the hands of the ward bosses and their over-bosses at the county and city levels.

Such a situation, the “progressives” said at the time, resulted in institutionalized political graft and fraudulent election results. It was time, the “good government reformers believed, to “professionalize” public administration to insure a supposedly unbiased and competent set of well-trained administrators who would serve the public interest and not that of professional politicians. It was time, the “good government” do-gooders bellowed, to implement a professional civil service at all levels of government in the United States of America.

Although there were multiple other reforms designed to limit the power of political bosses and thus to produce “efficient,” “honest” and “competent administration of public policy (primary elections, which were designed to take the power of nominating candidates for public office away from professional political party bosses, nonpartisan elections at the civic level, the county or city manager system, whose goal was to place the actual administration of a city or a county under the supervision of a professionally trained “nonpartisan,” thus leaving a mayor or county executive as a ceremonial figurehead who cut ribbons when the next Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company or F. W. Woolworth store opened in the community, and what are called the direct democracy reforms—the referendum, whether binding or nonbinding, the initiative, which was proposed to take power out of the hands of boss-controlled city councils and state legislatures, and the recall, which is a petition-initiated “citizen” effort to remove an elected official from office before his term has expired), the institutionalization of the civil service by the government of the United States of America by means of the Pendleton Civil Service Act of 1883, prompted by the assassination of President James Abram Garfield by a deranged office-seeker, Charles Guiteau, two years before, provided the model that would be adopted over time by state and local governments.

The Pendleton Civil Service Act, which underwent some reforms of itself with the passage of the United States Civil Service Act of 1978, established a system requiring most positions in the Federal government to be filled by a “merit system” that selected the top candidates who had the best scores on publicly announced, competitive examination (usually the “rule of seven” or the “rule of eleven” or the “rule of three) for advertised positions. Those hired serve a probationary period of usually nine months, after which they cannot be dismissed except for a long, cumbersome process known as “administrative cause.” In other words, civil servants have life tenure as long as the positions they hold are not eliminated by budgetary restrictions, noting a few restrictions and qualifications in the cases of civil servants who have been grossly incompetent or negligent in the performance of their duties.

Although the civil service took root at the Federal level in the latter part of the Nineteenth Century, the patronage system remained strong at the state and local levels until the Great Depression, which made it very difficult for the political party bosses and their under-bosses to dole out “welfare” (government jobs and contracts, food, legal favors, etc.) in exchange for loyalty expressed by working as volunteers to elect the party’s candidates given the large number of people in need of help, it was the aforementioned Great Depression that dealt the death blow to the boss system in many places, admitting a few exceptions here and there. The Welfare State, which had some of its roots in the administrations of Presidents Theodore Roosevelt and Thomas Woodrow Wilson, arose to take the place of the boss system and, more importantly, to take the place of the extended family, which was under attack by means of liberalized divorce laws in some states and the ready access to and acceptance of contraception. The Welfare State was administered by career civil servants, who then had a vested interest in keeping their clients dependent upon “their” largesse and expanding the scope of those who would become dependent upon government support for their very existence.

Even long before the Great Depression and over forty years before the Bolshevik Revolution, Otto von Bismarck, the prototypical socialist and social engineer, sought to make large segments of the German population dependent upon the largesse of the civil state so that the citizenry would be more inclined to look the other way as it, the civil state, increased control of their daily lives over the course of time. The Eurosocialist states are all descended from Otto von Bismarck and Karl Marx, whose "radicalism," as the Freemason Bismarck saw it, he sought to preempt by the creation of his own social welfare state. It was this social welfare state that American liberals saw as the basis of creating the more “perfect” social order on purely secular grounds.

As has been noted many times on this site, one of the proximate root causes of what can be called "liberalism" is the writing of John Locke, whose views were the direct result of the Protestant Revolution that began in England under King Henry VIII in 1534 and resulted in the proliferation of Protestant sects in a kingdom that had been Catholic for nearly a millennium. Readers of this site know that I care very much about root causes.

The Protestant Revolt engendered murder and mayhem in the German states after it was launched by the hideous, lecherous, drunken Augustinian monk named Father Martin Luther, O.S.A., on October 31, 1517, when he posted his "ninety-five theses" on the door of Castle Church in Wittenberg, Germany. Luther himself was aghast to see the almost instantaneous moral degeneration of his "evangelicals" into violent mobs who pilfered and sacked formerly Catholic churches and lived riotously, oblivious to the fact that he was responsible for this degeneration by depriving those who followed his revolution against Christ the King of the Sacraments and of the true teaching that Our King has entrusted to His Catholic Church for Its eternal safekeeping and infallible explication.

In like manner, of course, the Protestant Revolt in England engendered murder and violence, much of which was state-sponsored as Henry Tudor was responsible between the years of 1534 and 1547 for ordering the executions of over 72,000 Catholics who remained faithful to the Catholic Church following the decree that Parliament has passed that declared him to be the "supreme head of the Church in England as far as the law of God allowed." As was the case in the German states as princes gave Luther protection so that they, the princes, could govern in a Machiavellian manner free of any interference from Rome or their local bishops, so was it the case in England that the Protestant Revolution provided the receipt for the unchecked tyranny of English monarchs.

Indeed, the kind of state-sponsored social engineering that has created the culture of entitlement in England and elsewhere in Europe has its antecedent roots in Henry's revolt against the Social Reign of Christ the King and His Catholic Church in the Sixteenth Century.

Henry had Parliament enact various laws to force the poor who had lived for a nominal annual fee on the monastery and convent lands (as they produced the food to sustain themselves, giving some to the monastery or convent) off of those lands, where their families had lived for generations, in order to redistribute the Church properties he had stolen to those who supported his break from Rome. Henry quite cleverly created a class of people who were dependent upon him for the property upon which they lived and the wealth they were able to derive therefrom, making them utterly supportive of his decision to declare himself Supreme Head of the Church in England. Those of the poorer classes who had been thrown off the monastery and convent lands were either thrown into prison (for being poor, mind you) or forced to migrate to the cities, where many of them lost the true Faith and sold themselves into various vices just to survive. The effects of this exercise of state-sponsored engineering are reverberating in the world today, both politically and economically. Indeed, many of the conditions bred by the disparity in wealth created by Henry's land grab in the Sixteenth Century would fester and help to create the world of unbridled capitalism and slave wage that so impressed a German emigre in London by the name of Karl Marx. Unable to recognize the historical antecedents of the real injustices he saw during the Victorian Era, Marx set about devising his own manifestly unjust system, premised on atheism and anti-Theism, to rectify social injustice once and for all. In a very real way, Henry of Tudor led the way to Lenin of Russia.

The abuses of power by English monarchs led to all manner of social unrest in England, especially as those Anglicans who were followers of John Calvin sought to eradicate all remaining vestiges of Catholicism from Anglican "worship" and "doctrine" (removing Latin from certain aspects of the heretical Anglican liturgy, smashing statues, eliminating high altars in favor of tables, things that have been undertaken in the past forty years in many formerly Catholic churches that are now in the custody of the counterfeit church of conciliarism). This unrest produced the English Civil Wars of the 1640s and the establishment in 1649 of what was, for all intents and purposes, a Calvinist state under the control Oliver Cromwell that became a Cromwellian dictatorship between the years of 1653 to 1660 until the monarchy under the House of Stuart was restored in 1660. Oh yes, King Charles I lost his head, quite literally, in 1649 as the "Roundheads" of Oliver Cromwell came to power in 1649 following seven years of warfare between "parliamentarians" and "royalists." Revolutions always wind up eating their own. The English monarchy itself was eaten up by the overthrow of the Social Reign of the King of Kings by Henry VIII of the House of Tudor in 1534.

King James II, who had converted to Catholicism in France in 1668 while he was the Prince of York under his brother, King Charles II of the restored monarchy, acceded to the English throne in on June 6, 1885, following his brother's death, which occurred after Charles II himself had converted to the the Faith on his deathbed. Suspicious that the property that had been acquired and the wealth that had been amassed as a result of Henry VIII's social-engineering land grab of 150 years before would be placed in jeopardy, Protestant opponents of King James II eventually forced him to abdicate the throne in 1688, his rule having been declared as ended on December 11 of that year. The abdication of King James, whose second wife, Mary of Modena, had been assigned Blessed Father Claude de la Colombiere as her spiritual director when she was the Princess of York, is referred to by Protestant and secular historians as the "glorious revolution," so-called because it ushered in the penultimate result of the Protestant Revolution, the tyranny of the majority.

It was to justify the rise of majoritarianism that John Locke, a Presbyterian (Calvinist) minister, wrote his Second Treatise on Civil Government. Locke believed, essentially, that social problems could be ameliorated if a majority of reasonable men gathered together to discuss their situation. The discussion among these "reasonable men" would lead to an agreement, sanctioned by the approval of the majority amongst themselves, on the creation of structures which designed to improve the existing situation. If those structures did not ameliorate the problems or resulted in a worsening of social conditions then some subsequent majority of "reasonable men" would be able to tear up the "contract" that had bound them before, devising yet further structures designed to do what the previous structures could not accomplish. Locke did not specify how this majority of reasonable men would form, only that it would form, providing the foundation of the modern parliamentary system that premises the survival of various governments upon the whims of a majority at a given moment.

In other words, England's "problem" in 1688 was King James II. The solution? Parliament, in effect, declared that he had abdicated his throne rather than attempt to fight yet another English civil war to maintain himself in power as the man chosen by the parliamentarians to replace him, his own son-in-law William of Orange, who was married to his daughter Mary, landed with armed forces ready to undertake such a battle. The parliamentary "majority" had won the day over absolutism and a return to Catholicism.

Unfortunately for Locke, you see, social problems cannot be ameliorated merely by the creation of structures devised by "reasonable men" and sanctioned by the majority.

All problems in the world, both individual and social, have their remote causes in Original Sin and their proximate causes in the Actual Sins of men. There is no once-and-for-all method or structure by which, for example, "peace" will be provided in the world by the creation of international organizations or building up or the drafting of treaties.

There is no once-and-for-all method or structure by which, for example, "crime" will be lessened in a nation by the creation of various programs designed to address the "environmental" conditions that are said to breed it.

The only way in which social conditions can be ameliorated is by the daily reformation of individual lives in cooperation with the graces won for men by the shedding of the Most Precious Blood of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ upon the wood of the Holy Cross and that flow into our hearts and souls through the loving hands of Our Lady, she who is the Mediatrix of All Graces. And to the extent that social structures can be effective in addressing and ameliorating specific problems at specific times in specific places those who create and administer them must recognize their absolute dependence upon God's graces and that there is no secular, non-denominational or inter-denominational way to provide for social order. Social order and peace among nations depend entirely upon the subordination of the life of every person and the activities of every nation to the Social Reign of Christ the King as it is exercised by the Catholic Church. 

There is, therefore, amongst American Catholics who adhere to some kind of "leftist" worldview a belief that it is indeed the role of government to "solve" social ills, most of are the result, over and above the after-effects of Original Sin, the systematic, planned breakdown of the stability of the family that was one of the chief goals of Freemasons in state legislatures, starting in North Dakota, in the late-Nineteenth Century to liberalize divorce laws.

This systematic, planned breakdown of the family was expedited by the spread of contraception in the 1920s, leading ultimately to an epidemic of divorce and remarriage as spouses felt "free" to violate the Sixth Commandment injunction against adultery. Husbands abandoned wives. Wives abandoned husbands. Children became lost and confused. Entire classes of people became dependent upon the largesse of the civil state as a result. And this is to say nothing of the direct effort on the part of Margaret Sanger to break down the stability of the families of black Americans so that they could enjoy the benefits of her sort of social engineering, a fact that has been documented on this site in several articles.

If one believes in the leftist paradigm, however, one will be absolutely convinced that social "problems" are the result of not enough government spending and not enough government programs and not enough government regulations and not enough efforts to direct the daily lives of those who are dependent upon them and, ultimately, of us all as the "experts" and the bureaucrats know better as to how we should live than we do. Former President William Jefferson Blythe Clinton said as much in the late-1990s (I believe that it was when making a speech in Buffalo, New York). Let me see if I can find the quote. All right, here it is:

Clinton: "I can spend your money better than you can."

In a post-State of the Union speech in Buffalo, NY on January 20, 1999, Bill Clinton was asked why not a tax cut if we have a surplus. Clinton's response:

"We could give it all back to you and hope you spend it right... But ... if you don't spend it right, here's what's going to happen. In 2013 -- that's just 14 years away -- taxes people pay on their payroll for Social Security will no longer cover the monthly checks... I want every parent here to look at the young people here, and ask yourself, 'Do you really want to run the risk of squandering this surplus?' "Source: Washington Times, January 21, 1999. (Quote and commentary found at: Bill Clinton - Stupid Quotes and Statements.)

As the leaders of the “Good Government” (or “Progressive” or “Reform”) were shaped by the Lockean/Pelagian belief that it was possible to reform human behavior by the creation of structural reforms without any reliance upon Sanctifying and Actual Graces, however, these do-gooding nincompoops did not believe that their great ideas would create what was destined to become a fourth branch of government unaccountable even to the elected officials and their political appointees (Cabinet and sub-Cabinet appointees, for instance) who had nominal authority over them. Civil servants know that elected officials come and go while they stay, which is why they are usually pretty immune to any kind of pressure to change their ways, including the alliances that many of them form with leftist, Soros-funded “community organizations” who drink to the point of inebriation from the trough of taxpayer funding.

Although the senior career civil servants who do much of the actual implantation of public policy do not run for office, they are political creatures who develop alliances with key members of Congressional committees that have oversight responsibility over their work and with lobbyists who work with constituencies affected by the policies they administer. This “iron triangle” or “unholy alliance” as it has been called in political science literature is quite adept at thwarting any and all efforts on the part of a presidential administration whose leadership is intent on changing policies and/or the way in which they are administered.

What we are seeing at this present time, therefore, is just an open manifestation of a phenomenon that is now one hundred forty-one years old at the Federal level, admitting that the situation is a little different in some urban and suburban areas where there are still vestiges of the old-time political machine, something that is particularly true in my own native County of Nassau, New York.

Career bureaucrats in the Federal civil service who did not like former President Donald John Trump when he was in office made gargantuan efforts to coopt the president’s political appointees to follow their lead, not his, in the administration of public policy. This cooptation was most successful in rendering United States Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions into little other than a bureaucratic functionary who was afraid to offend the sensibilities of senior career Justice Department officials, most of whom are, shall we say, decidedly to the “left” of center and were working actively to effect Trump’s ouster. Although the names have changed, these career bureaucrats remain at the epicenter of the lawfare being that have been employed since the moment he announced his candidacy for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination nine years ago and is being used with particular glee right now before our very eyes.

Ironically, it was Trump himself who fell victim to the deep state apparatchiks during the coronascam plandemic four years ago. He gave those who were contemptuous of him carte blanche power to act as little caesars and caesarettes. They played him for a fool as he held his daily press conferences before yielding the microphone to his Big Pharma-owned vice president, Michael Richard Pence, and, of course, to Drs. Anthony Fauci and Deborah Birx. Fauci and Birx were the public faces of a global scheme to engage in monstrous lockdowns and “social distancing” and masking mandates that divided families and helped to destroy a vibrant economy during, quite “coincidentally,” a presidential election year.

Trump was convinced to start “Operation Warp Speed,” and he is still utterly incapable of seeing the harm that the so-called “vaccines” developed under this draconian program have injured and killed so many who thought they were simply following the “science” and doing what the experts said was in their own best interests. This inability to admit error is one of the former president’s most glaring personality defects, and, in this case, his unwillingness to look dispassionately at the evidence that scholarly medical practitioners have presented to him is damnable in the face of so many people being maimed and killed by the depopulation jabs called “vaccines.” Dr. Robert Malone was one of those who made an effort to educate the forty-fifth president and it was because the latter refused to listen that Malone stated last year that he could not support Trump’s election this year.

No. Donald John Trump chose to believe the “experts” who played him for a fool, and the chief among those experts, Anthony Fauci, is still clinging to his sociopathic ways even in the face of the testimony of some of his former confederates in the National Institutes for Health, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and his own National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases:

It’s a shame that Congress—both Democrats and Republicans—have been less interested in learning from America’s response to Covid-19 than in turning it into a political football. Yesterday, Dr. Anthony Fauci testified before a House subcommittee, but the lack of curiosity and understanding about the virus allowed the good doctor to walk away unscathed.

Fauci, who retired as the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases in late 2022, was the personification of the establishment’s response to the pandemic. It was he who insisted that schools needed to be closed, that lockdowns needed to be enforced, that vaccines should be mandated. Most blue states believed they were “following the science” in following Fauci’s recommendations. (Didn’t Fauci once say “I represent science”?) And though many Democrats now admit that this approach was a mistake, Fauci never has. 

Yet not a single Democrat called him out on these recommendations that did so much harm to so many people. Instead, Jill Tokuda, the Democrat from Hawaii, asked Fauci a series of questions designed to portray him as the indispensable man, without whom many more would have died. “I want to thank you, not blame you,” Tokuda said. “Thank you for your science.” Indeed, Fauci went so far as to claim that his primary role during the pandemic was to help roll out the vaccines in record time. In fact, he had nothing to do with the vaccine effort—but of course, no one called him on that either. 

As for the Republicans, they have had one obsession for years: to show that Covid-19 was the result of a lab leak. Republicans have long accused Fauci of using government funds to help pay for research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology that could have led to the creation of the virus. And he has long denied it, including at yesterday’s hearing. 

Remarkably, though, Fauci maintained that he had always kept an “open mind” about the origins of the virus causing Covid-19 and that he never attempted to censor or discredit opposing voices on the policies he spearheaded during the pandemic. This is laughable. Until the hearing, Fauci had consistently dismissed the lab leak hypothesis. And as for those opposing voices, after three dissident scientists published the Great Barrington Declaration, calling for a strategy of protecting the vulnerable and letting life resume otherwise, Fauci compared them to the doctors in the 1980s who claimed HIV didn’t cause AIDS.

One of those three dissident scientists, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, an epidemiologist and professor of health policy at Stanford University, told The Free Press that Fauci is “incapable of intellectual honesty” and of “honest engagement with his critics.” 

“I see no capacity for him to admit error at all throughout the entire pandemic. I just see arrogance,” Bhattacharya said, adding that no person “should ever have the kind of power that Fauci had” while he was director of the NIAID.

Republicans also tried to hammer Fauci over the fact that his senior adviser, David Morens, had actively evaded the Freedom of Information Act, writing in emails that he learned “how to make emails disappear” and suggesting to others they contact Dr. Fauci through a “secret back channel” or through his personal email address to avoid their communications becoming available to the public. In one email, Morens wrote to one recipient that there was “no worry about” the media finding out because Fauci “is too smart to let colleagues send him stuff that could cause trouble.” 

That last part appears to be true. Fauci spent much of the hearing distancing himself from Morens—condemning his behavior but stating repeatedly he “knew nothing” of his “actions.” There was nary an email to suggest otherwise. Tony Fauci came through intact, as usual. (‘Thank You for Your Science:’ Democrats Fail to Challenge Tony Fauci.)

Former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) director Dr. Anthony Fauci contradicted several of his past statements from the COVID-19 pandemic when he testified before Congress on Monday.

The former top pandemic adviser to two presidential administrations, who retired in 2022 after nearly four decades at the head of NIAID, faced sharp questions about the reversals from Republican members of the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic.

• “Americans were aggressively bullied, shamed, and silenced for merely questioning or debating issues such as social distancing, masks, vaccines, or the origins of COVID,” Chairman Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio) said in his opening remarks to Fauci, 83. “Anybody who’s looking at this carefully realizes that there’s a distinct anti-science flavor to this,” Fauci said in a Nov. 28, 2021, interview on CBS News’ “Face the Nation.” “So if they get up and criticize science, nobody’s going to know what they’re talking about. But if they get up and really aim their bullets at Tony Fauci, well, people could recognize there’s a person there. There’s a face, there’s a voice you can recognize, you see him on television. So it’s easy to criticize, but they’re really criticizing science because I represent science. That’s dangerous.”​
• “It sort of just appeared. I don’t recall,” Fauci said in a January congressional interview of the social distancing mandate imposed on federal agencies, businesses and schools. “Just an empiric decision that wasn’t based on data or even data that could be accomplished.”
• “When I say it was not based in science, I meant a prospective clinical trial to determine whether 6-foot was better than 3-, was better than 10-,” Fauci said Monday during his testimony, adding that it was a “CDC decision.”
• “We had discussions in the White House about that,” he acknowledged when asked why the mandate wasn’t changed. “But the CDC’s decision, it was their decision to make and they made it.”

Masking is necessary — even for children as young as 5 years old

In March 2020, Fauci said in a “60 Minutes” interview, “Wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better, and it might even block a droplet, but it’s not providing the perfect protection.”

Fauci went on to flip to support masking, even calling for it to be imposed on schoolchildren as an “extra step of caution” in a July 2021 interview on “CBS This Morning.”

“All of that is in the context of, at the time, 4,000, 5,000 people a day were dying,” Fauci said in Monday’s hearing before admitting: “There was no study that did masks on kids.”

“You took the position that you presented ‘the science’ and your words came across as final and as infallible in matters pertaining to the pandemic,” the chairman added before he and other Republican panel members recounted those statements.

COVID vaccine opposition is ‘ideological [garbage]

• “It’s been proven that when you make it difficult for people in their lives, they lose their ideological [garbage] and they get vaccinated,” Fauci said in an October 2020 audiobook recording of his biography, “Fauci,” written by New Yorker journalist Michael Specter.
• On Monday, Fauci said “that’s not what I was referring to” and the objections to COVID vaccines “were not,” in fact, “ideological [garbage].”

Lab leak proponents are promoting a ‘conspiracy theory’

“Not on my part,” Fauci said when asked whether he participated in efforts by federal public health agencies and White House officials to downplay of the lab leak theory and put pressure on big tech companies to censor its proponents.

“But look at the facts. I’ve kept an open mind throughout the entire process,” Fauci also said.

Then-NIH director Dr. Francis Collins, in an October 2020 email to Fauci, called for a “quick and devastating” takedown of leading epidemiologists, including Stanford’s Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, who authored the Great Barrington Declaration in opposition to COVID lockdowns and other mitigation measures.

Fauci and Collins also participated in efforts to produce a controversial research study, titled “The Proximal Origins of SARS-CoV-2,” that was pushed to debunk the lab leak theory.

“I’ve heard these conspiracy theories,” Fauci said in a February 2020 podcast appearance of concerns raised about the Chinese military’s ties to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which was later confirmed by a US intelligence assessment. “They’re just conspiracy theories.”

Vaccines are ‘a dead end’ to COVID

• “When you get vaccinated, you not only protect your own health and that of the family, but also you contribute to the community health by preventing the spread of the virus throughout the community,” Fauci said on CBS News’ “Face the Nation” in May 2021. “In other words, you become a dead end to the virus.”
• Asked Monday, the former NIAID chief answered: “Vaccines save lives. It is very, very clear that vaccines have saved hundreds of thousands of Americans. … In the beginning, it clearly prevented infection in a certain percentage of people, but the durability of its ability to prevent infection was not long, it was measured in months.”
• “It did not,” he added, “prevent transmission when the ability to prevent infection waned.” (The key moments when Dr. Anthony Fauci contradicted himself during heated COVID hearing.)

In late 2020, with the world now entirely locked down and the threat of forced or nearly-forced injections rising daily, the extraordinary Dr. Stefan Lanka, a former virologist, emailed out a short paper by a mathematician in Hamburg with astounding consequences.

Dr. Lanka and his colleagues’ many decades of work exposing the foundational problems with virology were now being echoed and built upon by a small group of doctors, scientists, journalists and thinkers in a quickly growing manner in 2020, and his revelations were beginning to reach the public in a significant way.

Yet a refrain was growing among the apologists for virology against many of Lanka’s claims. The refrain was simple – that perhaps he was correct about the pseudoscience of the earlier period of virology – but that recent virology was much more advanced and was based on the mathematical complexity of genomics – a complexity that critics simply couldn’t comprehend.

Desperate to show this canard for what it was – that the so-called genetic sequencing of the SARS-CoV-2 “virus” was an illusion at best and a fraud at worst — Dr Lanka had approached an eminent mathematician to blow the smoke away from this mathematical complexity hiding the fraudulence behind the claims that a SARS-CoV-2 “virus” had ever been found at all.

The paper was sent out to a handful of Lanka’s friends, myself included, but with Substack still in its infancy and most covid-critical doctors and scientists still without even a website, somehow the paper was never published on the internet.

Below is a reprint of the entire paper, published here in English, I believe, for the first time. Hopefully it can garner some attention from mathematics professors, geneticists, and lay people alike.

The mathematician Lanka turned to, calling himself only “A Mathematician From Hamburg” to avoid reprisals against his career, examined the central academic paper authored by the now infamous Dr. Fan Wu et al in Wuhan, China and printed in the February 2020 issue of the journal Nature: “A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China” which claimed to have genetically sequenced a “novel virus” later named SARS-CoV-2.

The mathematician in Hamburg downloaded the full data set and the appropriate software Fan Wu had used to claim the discovery of SARS-CoV-2, and then repeated Wu’s procedures. He returned to Dr. Lanka a clear refutation of the basic reasoning used to conclude that a novel virus had ever been discovered at all.

To understand this stunning work, one must understand the basic tenets of how Fan Wu and his colleagues ever claimed to have sequenced a virus in the first place. What they did is not a-traditional in the field of virology, but once understood, it beggars the imagination how such a sequence of steps could ever have been accepted as the central basis upon which to claim anything at all, let alone a scientific field, let alone the terrorizing and shutting down of the entire world.

Some background: By the 1980s, virology still had yet to find and isolate a single virus (it still hasn’t), and had changed little since its seminal claims in the 1950’s that placing snot mixed with antibiotics on monkey kidney cells proved the existence of a virus in the snot if the kidney cells deteriorated – ignoring the many other reasons such deterioration might take place. The second, and frankly, only other significant process done in virology at the time was taking photographs of obliterated snot under an electron-micrograph. If “virologists” saw circles (or another predetermined shape) in the imagery, they claimed this was further proof that a “virus” had been found – again ignoring the problem that they had no reason to conclude that their theoretical “viruses” were the only possible reason one might see a circle or another predetermined shape.

The obvious inconclusiveness and gaping logical flaws of these “experiments” was perhaps beginning to wear thin and the field had made few advancements upon the imagination of the public sphere.

When the computer revolution emerged simultaneously with the study of genomics, virology cast about for a way to study its theorized (yet still never found, isolated or proven to exist) particles using the new technology.

It’s worth noting that this was an entirely different process than what was used more generally in genomics. In other fields of genomics, one began with an actual isolated sample of the material in question (e.g a HORSE, a FLY, or a strain of BACTERIA, etc.) and catalogued what RNA could be found consistently in the isolated sample of such material. However, in virology, as they never had an actual sample of a “virus” in question, isolated from the rest of human fluid, all they could do was catalogue the entirety of the genetic material in their snot samples, and then take guesses as to what their imagined virus might be made from. (Revealed: The SARS-CoV-2 Sequencing Sham.)

House Judiciary Committee chairman Jim Jordan accused Dr. Anthony Fauci of making “false” testimony to Congress earlier this week and requested the former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) director return for another interview about alleged attempts to interfere with investigations into the origins of COVID-19.

In a Friday letter exclusively obtained by The Post, Jordan (R-Ohio) called out Fauci’s participation in President Biden’s COVID-19 Response Team, which pressured Big Tech companies in 2021 to censor critics of COVID lockdowns and other restrictions as well as proponents of the so-called “lab leak theory.”

Jordan also noted that former Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Director Dr. Robert Redfield testified in 2023 to the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic that Fauci “sidelined” him from internal COVID origins debates.

In his testimony Monday before the House COVID subcommittee, Fauci said he “kept an open mind” throughout the pandemic about the possibility of SARS-CoV-2 escaping through a laboratory accident

Jordan in his Friday letter called the testimony “false on its face.”

“During your tenure, the Response Team participated in extensive efforts to unconstitutionally monitor and censor Americans’ speech on social media platforms,” the chairman wrote. “Accordingly, we request that you appear for a transcribed interview and produce documents relevant to our investigation.”

Emails obtained by the House subcommittee and media outlets via Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests show Fauci and then-National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director Dr. Francis Collins declined to invite Redfield to join a conference call with top virologists about the origins of the novel coronavirus on Feb. 1, 2020.

That phone call led to the publication of a now-controversial paper, “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2,” which sought to debunk the lab leak theory and was later cited by Fauci at a White House press conference.

“[A] group of highly qualified evolutionary virologists looked at the sequences … in bats as they evolve and the mutations that it took to get to the point where it is now is totally consistent with a jump of a species from an animal to a human,” he told reporters on April 17, 2020, when asked if the virus could have come from a Chinese lab.

“I don’t have the authors right now, but we can make it available to you,” he added — despite having been on a call and traded emails with its co-authors before publication.

Two of those scientists who wrote the study — Dr. Kristian Andersen and Dr. Robert Garry — testified before the subcommittee last year that Fauci “prompted” their work after one of them suggested to the NIAID head that COVID-19 had “unusual features” that “(potentially) look engineered.”

The day before his White House press conference in April 2020, Collins had also emailed Fauci asking if there was “something NIH can do to help put down this very destructive conspiracy, with what seems to be growing momentum.”

“I hoped the Nature Medicine article on the genomic sequence of SARS-CoV-2 would settle this. But probably didn’t get much visibility,” Collins said before asking, “Anything more we can do?”

“I would not do anything about this right now,” Fauci answered the morning of April 17, hours before he would address reporters at the White House. “It is a shiny object that will go away in times [sic].”

Two months earlier, Fauci had said in a podcast interview that there were “conspiracy theories” about COVID-19 leaking out of a lab in Wuhan, China, potentially the US-funded Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), in connection with research done by Beijing’s military.

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence, in a June 2023 declassified report, found that the WIV conducted research between 2017 and 2019 on “pathogens and early disease warning capabilities for defensive and biosecurity needs of the military.”

An explosive trove of more than 150 emails released by the House COVID subcommittee last month show that Fauci’s former senior adviser, Dr. David Morens, further participated “in a conspiracy amongst the highest levels” of the agency to “hide” and potentially “destroy official records regarding the origins of COVID-19,” majority staff wrote in a memo.

Fauci in his testimony this week downplayed Morens’ role as an “adviser” and denied having joined in “secret back channel” communications with an NIH grantee that has since been barred from federal funding for conducting experiments at unsafe levels and failing to report risky experiments of viral growth.

Jordan’s panel and the House subcommittee, led by chairman Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio), have both requested access to Fauci’s private email records after revealing that Morens worked to protect and reinstate that grantee, Manhattan-based EcoHealth Alliance.

NIH principal deputy director Dr. Lawrence Tabak testified last month to the subcommittee that EcoHealth conducted gain-of-function experiments at the Wuhan Institute of Virology — but Fauci rejected the assessment in his own grilling.

The president of EcoHealth, Dr. Peter Daszak, has denied wrongdoing and, like Fauci, expressed natural spillover from animals to humans as the most likely origin for COVID-19.

Wenstrup’s panel has since recommended a criminal investigation into Daszak — and floated the possibility of another probe for Morens and others who covered up congressional efforts to shine a light on COVID origins.

Redfield, the FBI and the US Energy Department have said SARS-CoV-2 most likely leaked out of a Chinese lab — and former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe has called it the “only” explanation for the start of the pandemic.

COVID-19 emerged from Wuhan, China, in late 2019 and went on to kill more than 1.1 million Americans.

Jordan’s panel has asked Fauci to hand over all communications and documents between Jan. 1, 2019, and the present related to executive branch suppression of the lab leak theory; coordination with Collins, Daszak and others to evade FOIA or delete federal records; and communication with big tech platforms.

The chairman requested the comprehensive records by June 21 and for a subsequent transcribed interview with Fauci to be scheduled by that date.

Jordan noted that in a federal deposition in November 2022, Fauci said “I do not recall,” “I don’t remember” or similar statements “at least 212 times.”

In a two-day January interview with the House COVID subcommittee, Wenstrup’s staff pointed out that Fauci evaded questions in a similar way “more than 100 times.”

David Schertler, Fauci’s attorney who received the letter from Jordan, declined to comment. (House Judiciary chair Jim Jordan rips Fauci for 'false' testimony on COVID cover-up. Also see: Ex-Fauci top adviser offers apologies and excuses after COVID email revelations.)

Trying to nail the arrogant sociopath named Anthony Fauci, whose NIAID did indeed fund gain-of-function studies at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in 2013 at a time when then President Barack Hussein Obama/Barry Soetoro had banned such finding, is the equivalent of trying to JELL-O brand gelatin to the wall. Nothing, it would appear, fazes this sociopathic monster, who must give not a care in the world for how he will have to answer to his abominable crimes before Christ the King at the Particular Judgment when he dies. There will be no arrogant smirking possible at that time.

Contrary to what Fauci could not “recall,” the former deputy director at the National Institutes for Health, Lawrence Tabak, has testified that American taxpayers did fund gain-of-function research at the infamous Wuhan Institute of Virology in Red China even he maintained the disproved claim that the novel coronavirus emerged from a “wild animal market” and not from a leak at the Wuhan Institute of Virology:

At long last, National Institutes of Health (NIH) principal deputy director Lawrence Tabak admitted to Congress Thursday that US taxpayers funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China in the months and years before the COVID-19 pandemic.

“Dr. Tabak,” asked Rep. Debbie Lesko (R-Ariz.) of the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, “did NIH fund gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology through [Manhattan-based nonprofit] EcoHealth [Alliance]?”

“It depends on your definition of gain-of-function research,” Tabak answered. “If you’re speaking about the generic term, yes, we did.”

The response comes after more than four years of evasions from federal public health officials — including Tabak himself and former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) director Dr. Anthony Fauci — about the controversial research practice that modifies viruses to make them more infectious.

Tabak added that “this is research, the generic term [gain-of-function], is research that goes on in many, many labs around the country. It is not regulated. And the reason it’s not regulated is it poses no threat or harm to anybody.”

Dr. Bryce Nickels, a professor of genetics at Rutgers University and co-founder of the pandemic oversight group Biosafety Now, told The Post the exchange “was two people talking past each other.”

“Tabak was engaging in the usual obfuscation and semantic manipulation that is so frustrating and pointless,” Nickels said, adding that the NIH bigwig was resisting accountability for risky research that can create pathogens of pandemic potential.

“Instead of addressing this directly, Tabak launched into a useless response about how ‘gain-of-function’ encompasses many types of experiments,” he added.

In July 2023, the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) barred the Wuhan Institute of Virology from receiving federal grants for the next 10 years.

EcoHealth Alliance, whose mission statement declares it is “working to prevent pandemics,” had all of its grant funding pulled by HHS for the next three years on Tuesday.

EcoHealth Alliance president Dr. Peter Daszak, in a hearing earlier this month before the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, testified that his organization “never has and did not do gain-of-function research, by definition.”

But that claim directly contradicted Daszak’s private correspondence, including a 2016 email in which he celebrated the end of an Obama administration pause on gain-of-function research.

The EcoHealth head was also called out in sworn testimony to the COVID panel by Dr. Ralph Baric, a leading coronavirologist who initiated the research himself and declared it was “absolutely” gain-of-function.

In an October 2021 letter to Congress, Tabak had acknowledged NIH funded a “limited experiment” at the Wuhan Institute of Virology that tested whether “spike proteins from naturally occurring bat coronaviruses circulating in China were capable of binding to the human ACE2 receptor in a mouse model.”

He did not describe it as gain-of-function research — but disclosed that EcoHealth “failed to report” the bat coronaviruses modified with SARS and MERS viruses had been made 10,000 times more infectious, in violation of its grant terms.

The NIH scrubbed its website of a longstanding definition for gain-of-function research the same day that the letter was sent.

Tabak also noted in his October 2021 letter that the “sequences of the viruses are genetically very distant” from COVID-19 — but other grant proposals from EcoHealth have since drawn scrutiny for their genetic similarities.

Fauci has repeatedly denied that the Wuhan lab research involved gain-of-function experiments, clashing with Republicans in high-profile hearings and “playing semantics” with the term during a closed-door interview with the House COVID panel earlier this year.

“He needs to define his definition of gain-of-function research, because as I have through this process in the last three years, read many, many published articles about gain-of-function research, or creation of a chimera, this is a new one,” COVID subcommittee Chairman Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio) said following Fauci’s grilling in January.
The ex-NIAID head and White House medical adviser under President Biden was escorted by Capitol Police and his attorneys to and from the committee room for his two days of interviews — and repeatedly dodged The Post’s questions about gain-of-function research and pandemic lockdown restrictions.

In 2021, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) held Fauci’s feet to the fire over the evasions in several hearings.

“The NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” Fauci declared that May.

In another House hearing the same month, then-NIH director Dr. Francis Collins testified that researchers at the Wuhan lab “were not approved by NIH for doing gain-of-function research.”

“We are, of course, not aware of other sources of funds or other activities they might have undertaken outside of what our approved grant allowed,” Collins added cautiously at the time.

That ignorance about what experiments came about as a result of the NIH grants was underscored by Daszak during his COVID subcommittee hearing last week.

The EcoHealth leader acknowledged he had not asked longtime collaborator and Wuhan Institute of Virology deputy director Shi Zhengli for any viral sequences since before the pandemic began.

In his own closed-door testimony to the House subcommittee released Thursday, Collins echoed Tabak’s comments but went further by saying there “is a generic description of gain-of-function which is utilized in scientific and public conversation, but is not appropriate to apply that to a circumstance where we’re talking about a potential pathogen.”

“We need to be highly cognizant of the risks of gain-of-function technology now that scientific capabilities exist for creating something in a lab that didn’t exist 100 years ago, or even 50 years ago,” Wenstrup told The Post following Thursday’s hearing.

“Drs. Fauci and Collins, over a decade ago, both conceded that there are risks associated with gain-of-function research.”

EcoHealth received more than half a million dollars for its work with the Wuhan Institute of Virology as part of a grant of more than $4 million to study the emergence of bat coronaviruses between 2014 and 2024.

That grant was revoked in 2020, reinstated in 2023 and finally suspended and proposed for debarment this week.

The House subcommittee is still investigating whether COVID-19 accidentally leaked out of a lab in Wuhan, which has been described as the most likely cause of the pandemic by the FBI, US Energy Department, ex-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) director Dr. Robert Redfield and former Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe.

Nickels also slammed Tabak Thursday for still claiming the evidence points to SARS-CoV-2 originating in a “wild animal market in Wuhan.”

“No credible scientist still believes this. In fact, the wet market theory has even been refuted by the world’s leading coronavirus expert, Ralph Baric, in his testimony from January,” Nickels said.

The Rutgers prof added that Thursday’s hearing highlighted the lack of oversight for scientific research on pathogens that poses a threat to humans, making it “up to the grantee to oversee themselves,” as Wenstrup put it.

“It’s pure insanity to continue to delegate responsibly for risk/benefit analysis of research that poses an existential threat to humanity to the scientist that will perform the work and their institutions,” Nickels claimed.

“We just had a devastating pandemic likely caused by creation of a [Pathogen with Enhanced Pandemic Potential] in a lab, and yet scientists want the public to trust them that they can police themselves?” he balked. “That’s just total and complete nonsense.”

Fauci is scheduled to answer questions about the gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab and theories of the origin of the pandemic in a public subcommittee hearing set for June 3. (NIH director admits taxpayers funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan — four years after COVID pandemic began.)

Even though Dr. Francis Boyle was able to ascertain the likely source of novel SARS-CoV-2 virus as early as February of 2020 in an interview with Geopolitics that was republished in Christian Order, the Mister Magoos of the medical, scientific, intelligence, academic, and media worlds continued to lie and lie and lie about the virus’s origins and then liked about to treat those infected with it. It was those lies and arrogant mismanagement that caused the death of most of those who were infected with the disease:

COVID-19, which killed 1.1 million Americans and destroyed the lives and livelihoods of millions more, is a man-made virus that escaped from a Chinese lab partly funded by the US government.

Even today, you’re not suppose to say that — even though it’s the only plausible scenario.

No, “fact checkers” will rush in to claim that eminent scientists deny this. Which is because those scientists have too much invested — in money, in time, in their own beliefs — to admit the truth.

But as Congress continues to probe, that truth is coming out, little by little, and the lies are being exposed:

LIE: The virus didn’t come from the lab in Wuhan.

Anyone who questioned this claim — including The Post — were censored online in 2020. The reason? A statement published in Lancet by 27 scientists calling it a “conspiracy theory.”

We now know that statement was drafted by Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance, the company working on research in the Wuhan lab. He was just trying to cover his own complicity.

All signs point to a lab leak. The only reason we can’t say it conclusively is because China has been allowed to destroy all evidence.

LIE: The US didn’t fund “gain of function” research.

Scientists sometimes experiment with viruses, making them easier to catch or more deadly as a way to determine what might happen or what vaccines may be needed.

But in May 2021, Fauci stated unequivocally that the US “has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”

On Thursday, NIH Deputy Director Lawrence Tabak directly contradicted that. US taxpayers did fund EcoHealth, which was working on gain-of-function research in Wuhan.

Tabak’s new excuse? “Gain of function” doesn’t mean what we’ve always been told it means. It’s perfectly “safe,” he claimed.

On cue, the National Institute of Health has changed the definition of the term on its website to make it sound benign.

Except it isn’t benign. EcoHealth was specifically working in China because such work was not allowed in the United States. What researchers were doing with coronaviruses was very dangerous.

And while there may be a scientific debate about whether such inquiries are worthwhile, deadly viruses have leaked from Chinese labs before. It is the height of irresponsibility for the US to be involved.

On cue, the National Institute of Health has changed the definition of the term on its website to make it sound benign.

Except it isn’t benign. EcoHealth was specifically working in China because such work was not allowed in the United States. What researchers were doing with coronaviruses was very dangerous.

And while there may be a scientific debate about whether such inquiries are worthwhile, deadly viruses have leaked from Chinese labs before. It is the height of irresponsibility for the US to be involved.

The Heritage Foundation has called the coverup of the origins of COVID “The Lie of Century.” We agree. This is a scandal of colossal scale, one that requires a complete overhaul of the entire National Institutes of Health.

They lied about a weapon that devastated our country. They can’t be allowed to get away with it. (We now know the likely truth about COVID, and how scientists lied.)

Dr. Anthony Fauci -- the embodiment of Science Itself, in his own mind -- appeared before a House panel yesterday, his first testimony since quasi-retiring from public life.  The session arrived on the heels of several revelations, including Fauci's apparent admission that some of the "science" we were indignantly instructed to follow by people like him was effectively made up, saying that it "sort of just appeared."  This included the six-foot distancing guidance, as well as child masking.  Neither practice, implemented far and wide, was harmless.  The former policy wreaked havoc in all sorts of ways, especially for business owners struggling to comply with the nonsense "science" while trying to keep their doors open.  The latter policy amounted to anti-scientific cruelty to kids, whose faces were muzzled with no strong medical basis, exacerbating learning and cognitive setbacks for many.  Another recent development revealed that Fauci's right-hand man had boasted in emails about suppressing information and bypassing legally-mandatory transparency (FOIA) requests, including via evidence destruction:

Subpoenaed private emails from Dr. Fauci’s senior adviser, David Morens, now show how NIH officials and EcoHealth President Peter Daszak sought to conceal their lapses. After the Trump administration in April 2020 suspended funding for EcoHealth, Dr. Morens rallied to Mr. Daszak’s defense. “There are things I can’t say except Tony [Fauci] is aware and I have learned there are ongoing efforts within NIH to steer through this with minimal damage to you, Peter, and colleagues, and to nih and niaid,” Dr. Morens wrote to Mr. Daszak on April 26, 2020. “I have reason to believe that there are already efforts going on to protect you.” (NIAID is the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which Dr. Fauci directed from 1984 through 2022.) Dr. Morens led the Daszak protection program. His subpoenaed emails show that he helped edit EcoHealth’s press releases and worked to get its funding restored. He also sought to thwart Freedom of Information Act requests by outside groups regarding the EcoHealth grant. On Feb. 24, 2021, Dr. Morens wrote to Boston University scientist Gerald Keusch: “I learned from our foia lady here how to make emails disappear after i am fioa’d [sic] but before the search starts, so i think we are all safe. Plus i deleted most of those earlier emails after sending them to gmail.”

You'll recall that Daszak is the figure who was desperate to derail the (almost certainly correct) 'lab leak theory,' based on his own professional and financial interests, to which Fauci was also tied.  Daszak famously thanked Fauci for running interference on the subject, as Fauci had fairly aggressively downplayed the Wuhan Lab hypothesis that was privately discussed as highly likely from the earliest days, before everyone was told to shut up about it.  Morens assured Daszak that there were "efforts" afoot to "protect" him.  Morens also breathed a sigh of relief that "we are all safe" due to a process he'd discovered to delete evidence that had been requested.  "Safe"?  From what?  That bolded portion of the excerpt above describes outright illegal conduct.  This is sinister stuff, especially considering the stakes.  More explosive findings from these non-deleted emails:

Government officials are required by law to preserve their emails and to conduct government business on government accounts. Dr. Morens didn’t, and his emails suggest Dr. Fauci might also have used private addresses in this manner. Dr. Morens wrote to Mr. Daszak on April 21, 2021: “PS, i forgot to say there is no worry about FOIAs. I can either send stuff to Tony on his private gmail, or hand it to him at work or at his house. He is too smart to let colleagues send him stuff that could cause trouble.”...Dr. Morens wrote to another outside collaborator, Baylor College of Medicine’s Peter Hotez, on June 28, 2021, that he had deleted all his emails related to the Covid origin “when the s— started hitting the fan.” “I feel pretty sure Tony’s was too. The best way to avoid FOIA hassles is to delete all emails when you learn a subject is getting sensitive.”

This Morens figure isn't some random, fringe character. He was a very close Fauci associate for decades, described by some as his 'right-hand man.' His title was 'senior adviser' to Fauci. Given the absolutely scandalous nature of his admissions, Moren's stated behavior is a real problem for Fauci, so Fauci decided to try to pretend that he didn't really work too closely with Morens, who didn't really advise him very much, per se. Slippery, credulity-straining damage control:

Another telling exchange on Monday occurred when Fauci was pinned down with his own words, describing how deputizing institutions like schools and businesses to make people's lives difficult for unvaccinated people would successfully coerce many people into getting the shots.  Rather than owning his vindictive-sounding comments, Fauci claimed the plain meaning of his words, very much in context, was "not what I was referring to."  Yes, it most certainly was:

He said what he said, on tape. It's crystal clear what he meant. Other Fauci deflections, obfuscations, dissembling, and parsing might succeed in confusing a lot of people who aren't following these twists and turns closely. But this one is easy to understand. Fauci was reveling in the reality that universities and employers could make people's lives miserable unless or until they complied with vaccine guidelines or requirements. To attempt 'that's not what I really meant' spin is not merely feeble, but obviously dishonest. And if he's willing to mislead so brazenly about something this unambiguous -- just like trying to convince people that his own senior adviser didn't really advise him -- people are well within their rights to distrust anything or everything else Fauci asserts. He insists that any allegation that he helped cover-up the lab leak theory are "absolutely false and simply preposterous.” Based on quite a bit of evidence, and his untrustworthiness, I simply don't believe him. My overall reaction:

When Fauci wants credit, as he almost always does, he is The Science.  When there's a problem, it's suddenly someone else's issue, over which he suddenly wields no real control or authority:

A weaselly, cowardly performance. I'll leave you with Dr. Marty Makary's review of Fauci's Hill visit.  Be sure to listen all the way to the end for a substantive rebuttal to Fauci's freshly-repeated claim that sensible, Sweden-style COVID policies (as laid out in the suppressed Great Barrington Declaration) would have killed an additional one million Americans: (Fauci Just Keeps Lying and Lying and Lying. Also see: (Fauci & Co. need to pay a price for funding Wuhan lab research — and trying to cover it up, Fauci & Co. need to pay a price for funding Wuhan lab research — and trying to cover it up, Grant Stinchfield Exposes Dr. Fauci as a Tyrant. Grant Stinchfield Exposes Dr. Fauci as a Tyrant, and

There was never any “science” to support “social distancing” and masking mandates.

There was no “science” to support the monstrous lockdowns.

There was no “science” to the fearmongering that was used to get the public “in line” with their statist program of social control in the name of “public health.”

There was no “science” to support the ascribing of deaths caused by heart attacks, accidents, or old age to the Wuhan virus.

There was no “science” to support the use of ventilators, which caused the deaths of thousands upon thousands of people who had been urged to wait to seek early intervention treatment once they realized they had contracted the virus.

There was no “science” to support the “medical protocols” Anthony Fauci’s campaign against hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, NAC, and massive doses of Zinc and Vitamins C and D as treatments for those infected with the Wuhan Virus.

And there was no “science” to support the suppression of  all scholarly studies that were produced to document the true source of the SARS-CoV-2 novel coronavirus, something that Dr. Deborah Birx, now admits four years after the fact:

Dr. Deborah Birx, a former White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator under Donald Trump, told CNN on Tuesday that there was an effort to squash scientists suggesting the COVID-19 virus started in a lab in Wuhan, China. 

"I think early on, people did take very definitive sides, and it did divide along party lines, and we're still suffering from that four years later," Birx told CNN's Kasie Hunt, who asked if there was any substance to the argument that the lab leak theory was suppressed. 

"I do think it happened. If you look at what people said about Bob Redfield and how they disparaged him as a scientist because he wanted to bring forward the lab leak potential," the former top medical official said.

Redfield, a former director of the CDC, suggested early on that the COVID-19 pandemic started in a lab, which was widely dismissed by the media and other prominent health officials. 

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the former Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, denied during a hearing on Capitol Hill on Monday that he suppressed the theory. 

Birx told Hunt on Tuesday, "And I think the reason he felt he [Redfield] needed to bring it forward to push, was to push against this, ‘it had to be this way.’ Because we didn‘t know, and we knew we would never know. I mean, we knew as SARS that China was not transparent. We knew with the second SARS, China was not transparent, so we were not going to get an answer, but that shouldn‘t have held us back 4.5 years later from both ensuring that we protect against lab leaks and we protect that public."

She added that lab leaks "definitely" happen and noted, "people got infected with HIV in the lab."

"And so we have to put different rules and regulations and guidelines in place to protect the public. We can do that. We‘ve done that before," Birx said. 

Birx also discussed the House Oversight Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic hearing on Monday. 

"The one thing good coming out of the hearing, I believe, and I think Dr. Fauci made this point over and over again, we’re at a place where we can definitively say we do not know if it was lab or zoonotic, from animals. We do a lot of zoonotic work. It’s our opportunity to really decide as a global community how we’re going to control laboratory experiments in a way that protects the public," she said.

Fauci, during the hearing on Monday, also defended vaccine mandates for students, employees and the military. 

"Vaccines save lives. It is very, very clear that vaccines have saved hundreds of thousands of Americans and millions worldwide," he said. 

"In the beginning, it clearly prevented infection in a certain percentage of people but the durability of its ability to prevent infection was not long. It was measured in months," he added. (Dr. Deborah Birx admits there was an effort to squash COVID lab leak theory.) 

As will be shown later in this commentary, the vaccines do not save lives. They have maimed and killed untold numbers of human beings, and millions of others are walking with time bombs that will destroy their health over time because of the mRNA technology used in the Moderna line of poisoned jabs.

Insofar as Deborah Birx’s ex post facto admission concerning the suppression of the Wuhan laboratory leak studies, suffice it to say that various academics were forced to retract their own studies, something that is common in Communist countries but has become all too common among the Marxist-influence elites of the supposedly “civilized” West. (Please see: University forced retraction of study linking COVID shot with cancer risk, co-author says. Also see Stanford, Silicon Valley, and the Rise of the Censorship Industrial Complex, NIAID Advisor Caught in COVID-19 Cover-up, Gain-of-Function H5N1 Influenza, Kaiser Begs Unvaccinated Employees to Return and NIH scientists made $710M in royalties from drug makers, a fact they tried to hide.)

Anyone who doubts that totalitarianism is upon us as most people live contented with their bread and circuses ought to remember that the institutionalization of a not-so-soft tyranny is the direct result of what happens when men dethrone of the only true standard of human liberty, the Holy Cross of the Divine Redeemer, Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, and thus become allured by the goddess of a false liberty that is used by the adversary over time to use his minions to enslave the multitudes in this passing, moral vale of tears and thence for all eternity with him in hell to be tortured ceaselessly:

In this regard, therefore, it would be wise to consider the words spoken by Our Lady to the Venerable Mary of Agreda that are contained in The Mystical City of God, which explains that we are far from the sort of governance whereby those who exercise civil authority do so according to the mind of her Divine Son, Christ the King, as He has discharged It entirely to His Holy Church:

587. From many kingdoms and provinces where the Apostles were preaching numbers of converts came to Jerusalem in order to visit and converse with the Mother of the Redeemer of the world, at the same time offering rich gifts. Among others four sovereign princes, who were royal governors of provinces, visited Her and brought many valuable presents which they placed at her disposal for her own use and for the Apostles and disciples. The great Lady answered that She was poor like her Son, and the Apostles likewise were poor in imitation of their Master, and thus these riches were not appropriate to the life they professed. They begged Her to console them by accepting their gifts for the poor or for divine worship. Due to their persistent requests She received part of what they offered, and from some of it She wove rich vestments for the altar, while the rest She distributed among the indigent and the infirmaries, for She was accustomed to visit such places and often served and washed the poor with her own hands, performing such services, as well as distributing the alms, on her knees. Whenever it was possible She consoled the needy and assisted the sick in their last agony, nor did She ever rest from works of charity, either actually engaging in them or pleading and praying for others in her retirement.

588. She gave salutary advice to those princes or kings at their visit, admonishing them and instructing them in regard to the good government of their provinces. She charged them to watch over the equitable administration of justice without acceptation of persons; to consider themselves mortal men as all the rest; to fear the supreme Judge, by whom all are to be judged according to their own works; and above all to further the exaltation of the name of Christ and the propagation and security of the holy faith, in which alone the governments and monarchies can be solidly established, for without this government is but a lamentable and most unhappy slavery of the demons which is permitted by the hidden judgments of God for the punishment of both those who govern and who are governed. The fortunate princes promised faithfully to execute all of her instructions, and they afterwards remained in communication with the heavenly Queen through letters and other correspondence. The same happened to each one in particular who visited Her, for all of them left her presence more ardent in virtue, full of light, joy, and unspeakable consolation. Many upon seeing Her who were as yet unbelievers loudly professed their belief in the true God, for they were unable to restrain the interior forces awakened by the presence of his Blessed Mother. (The New English Edition of The Mystical City of God: The Coronation, Book 8, Chapter 10.)

This is the most precise summary of the Social Reign of Christ the King and what happens to men and their nations absent it that can be found.

Are there any more questions about why the world is in a mess?

Nations that do not acknowledge Christ the King and do not promote public no devotion to Our Lady, especially through her Most Holy Rosary, are doomed to be in “a lamentable and most unhappy slavery of the demons which is permitted by the hidden judgments of God for the punishment of both those who govern and who are governed.”

Systematic Social Control and Behavior Modification Under the Guise of “Vaccines”

Although most of the American lords of “science” and the largely faceless apparatchiks who live in their own delusional world of moral superiority refuse to admit the harm that has been and continues to be done by the poisoned jabs, there are others elsewhere in the world who admit that the Covid-19 jabs have been an exercise in mass murder:

The most senior medical oncologist in Japan recently slammed the COVID-19 mRNA shots as “the work of evil” that has caused “essentially murder.”

In an interview published April 19, Dr. Masanori Fukushima, who spearheaded the first cancer outpatient clinic at Kyoto University and launched the first course in pharmacoepidemiology there, listed a slew of problems with the COVID mRNA jabs, evidencing what he called an evil “abuse of science.”

He pointed out that “turbo cancers,” a kind “previously unseen by doctors” that progress extremely quickly and are typically in stage four by the time they are diagnosed, have started to appear after the jab rollouts. These “turbo cancers” are emerging along with excess mortality due to cancer in general, which Fukushima says cannot be explained only by lost opportunities for screenings or treatment during the COVID outbreak.

As a tragic example of the fatal danger of the COVID shots, the oncologist shared the story of a 28-year-old man who was found dead by his wife when she tried to wake him in the morning, five days after he received his second Pfizer shot. 

“The doctor who did the autopsy said that when he tried to remove the heart, it was soft and had disintegrated,” Fukushima said. “And even just one case like this shows how dangerous this vaccine can be.”

He pointed out that these severe harms, including death, have been afflicting people – post-jab – who have a history of good health.

“It’s serious. It’s essentially murder. In the end, I want to state clearly that this is my view,” the doctor said.

He lamented that the media, including newspapers, generally have not reported on these harms, and that in fact those who question the safety of the COVID shots – just as with the flu shots – have been characterized as anti-science “heretics.” He described the attitude of those who shut down the voices COVID “vaccine” critics, however, as far from scientific, and “more akin to faith, hysteria or even cult behavior.”

“I am now deeply concerned not only about a serious crisis in medicine but in science and democracy,” Fukushima said.

He highlighted the fact that countries that most aggressively pushed the COVID shot, such as Israel, saw the highest rates of death and infection, as shown by studies comparing Middle Eastern countries, including Jordan, Syria and Egypt. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu arranged a special deal with Pfizer to use Israelis as lab rats in a national injection program with the Pfizer Covid “vaccine.”

“Israel led in early and widespread vaccination but also had the highest death and infection rates. The less aggressively vaccinated areas saw less harm,” said Fukushima, noting that “Israel was quick to halt the vaccine.” 

There were problems, moreover, with the very technology used to administer the mRNA – the lipid nanoparticles – that the doctor said result in “off-target effects” on various organs, including the ovaries, brain, liver, and bone marrow.

Worse, the spike proteins produced by the mRNA have been detected in the human body more than a year after the administration of the COVID shot, noted the oncologist, indicating “a severe problem.”

The doctor took aim at the World Health Organization (WHO) for “hastily” pushing the COVID shots without proper investigation, and moreover for trying to enforce a one-size-fits-all approach in countries with widely varying “medical circumstances, habits, and systems,” calling it “somewhat absurd.”

He argued that it is “crucial” that the WHO take responsibility for the harms of the COVID shots, which he called “an abuse, a misuse of science and an evil practice of science, to be frank.”

Fukushima pointed out that the WHO is “aware” of harms from the so-called vaccines because they are compensating for these damages in certain countries, and yet they are not properly addressing the COVID shot-induced death and injury through an investigation and report.

“Imagine finding your spouse dead in the morning. It’s no joke. A vaccine that causes such outcomes, even a single death, is unacceptable,” said Fukushima, adding that in Japan alone, the government has documented 2,134 deaths reported due to the COVID shot, which is likely a low estimate.

“There are tens of thousands of people who must see a doctor because of vaccine-related issues,” he continued, asserting that a big chunk of them – 30 percent – are “suffering from ME (myalgic encephalomyelitis) or chronic fatigue syndrome.” 

This is just the beginning, according to Fukushima, because the rates of all sorts of diseases have been spiking since the COVID shot rollout, including “autoimmune disease, neurodegenerative diseases, cancer, and infections.”

“It’s as if we’ve opened Pandora’s box… We must take these damages seriously and address them earnestly. Any efforts to dismiss these damages as if they didn’t happen are frankly the work of evil. This is a quintessential example of the evil practice of science,” Fukushima said.

He called on scientific and medical institutions, led by the WHO, to directly confront these outcomes through research efforts in order to “shine the light of science” on the shots.

“We should never again use such vaccines,” he said. “This is a shame for humanity. It’s a disgrace that we did this.” (Japan’s most senior cancer doctor: COVID shots are ‘essentially murder’.)

This kind of honesty is very rare from someone as respected in his field as Dr. Fukushima is in Japan, and it also stands in sharp contrast with the delusional world in which so-called “experts” such as Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the director general of the World Health Organization, who has just recently stated that “it’s time to be more aggressive in pushing back on anti-vaxxers”:

The director-general of the World Health Organization (WHO), Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, declared “it’s time to be more aggressive in pushing back on anti-vaxxers.”

During a talk titled “Celebrating 50 years of immunization progress,” Ghebreyesus said: “You know the serious challenge that’s posed by anti-vaxxers, and I think we need to strategize to really push back.”

“I think it’s time to be more aggressive in pushing back on anti-vaxxers,” he stated. “I think they used COVID as an opportunity, and you know all the havoc they are creating.”

The WHO has previously attacked people opposed to the dangerous, ineffective, and abortion-tainted COVID shots, baselessly smearing critics of the experimental injections as a “major killing force” and attempting to link them to the “far right.”

The WHO and Ghebreyesus completely disregard overwhelming evidence that the experimental COVID injections have caused millions of deaths and serious injuries and the dramatic recent pronouncement from a former Japanese government minister apologizing for such deaths.

In his talk, Ghebreyesus addressed the supposed achievements of vaccines in general and childhood vaccination in particular, failing to mention the role of improved nutrition and sanitation in reducing child and maternal mortality.

“More than 14 million children in 2022 did not receive a single dose of vaccine; working together with partners like GAVI [the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization] and UNICEF, we aim to halve that number by 2030,” the WHO chief said.
Ghebreyesus praised GAVI’s role “in supporting access to vaccines around the world” and called on people to donate to its “replenishment letter” program. Both GAVI and the WHO receive hundreds of millions of dollars in funding from the Gates Foundation every year.

Prominent critics of Big Pharma and the medical establishment, such as eminent cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough, have stated that surging rates of autism and gender confusion in children may be connected to over-vaccination in early childhood years. (WHO Director Tedros: ‘It’s Time To Be More Aggressive in Pushing Back on Anti-Vaxxers.)

Well, even a judge on the most “progressive” court in the United States of America, the uber-liberal United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, has ruled, quite to the contrary of Tedros, that the so-called Covid vaccines do not stop transmission of the disease:

An appeals court ruled that mRNA COVID-19 shots do not prevent viral transmission and therefore that mandating COVID injections lacks legal basis.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on Friday vacated the dismissal of a lawsuit against a California school district for mandating COVID shots, brought forth by the Health Freedom Defense Fund, California Educators for Medical freedom, and other plaintiffs.

The Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) had required that employees get the injections or “lose their jobs,” which the plaintiffs said “interfered with their fundamental right to refuse medical treatment,” the appeals court noted.

The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California had defended LAUSD’s jab mandate on the grounds that the 1905 Supreme Court decision Jacobson v. Massachusetts upheld the right of states to mandate smallpox vaccinations.

However, in an opinion penned by Judge R. Nelson, the Ninth Circuit appeals court said that the whole basis of Jacobson was the assumption that vaccines prevented the transmission of smallpox, whereas the plaintiffs in this case “have plausibly alleged that the COVID-19 vaccine does not effectively ‘prevent the spread’ of COVID-19.”

“At this stage, we must accept Plaintiff’s allegations that the vaccine does not prevent the spread of COVID-19 as true. And, because of this, Jacobson does not apply,” wrote Judge Nelson.

The plaintiffs also asserted that the mRNA COVID shots are not “traditional” vaccines, in part because the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) changed its definition of a “vaccine” in September 2021, from a product that “produce[s] immunity” to a “preparation” which “stimulate[s] the body’s immune response.”

“Their complaint’s crux is that the COVID-19 ‘vaccine’ is not a vaccine,” Nelson explained. “’Traditional’ vaccines, Plaintiffs claim, should prevent transmission or provide immunity to those who get them. But the COVID-19 vaccine does neither.”

As LifeSiteNews has previously reported, Pfizer’s president of international developed markets, Janine Small, affirmed during a European Union (EU) hearing that the pharma giant did not test the ability of its mRNA COVID-19 jabs to stop transmission of the virus, but pushed them through anyway to keep up with “the speed of science.”

This contradicted prior claims by CDC Director Rochelle Walensky and other prominent U.S. “experts” that the vast majority of people who had gotten “fully vaccinated” would not get or transmit COVID-19. U.S. President Joe Biden also falsely asserted that people who had gotten jabbed couldn’t spread COVID to others. Their claims lent credence to efforts in the United States and abroad to require people to get injected with the experimental shots before being allowed to participate in social life.

Dr. Anthony Fauci himself declared numerous times that people who take the injections become “dead ends to the virus,” before later reversing himself, as others supporters of the COVID jabs have done, including Bill Gates. 

Small’s admission that Pfizer did not determine whether the COVID shots could stop transmission prompted Member of European Parliament Rob Roos to publicly declare that it was “shocking” and “even criminal” that governments allowed vaccine passports to become a reality when Pfizer had not even tested whether the shots stopped transmission.

A significant body of evidence links serious risks to the COVID shots. Among it, VAERS reports 37,544 deaths, 216,213 hospitalizations, 21,668 heart attacks, and 28,366 myocarditis and pericarditis cases as of April 26, among other ailments. U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) researchers have recognized a “high verification rate of reports of myocarditis to VAERS after mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination,” leading to the conclusion that “under-reporting is more likely” than over-reporting. (Federal court rules COVID shots don't stop transmission of virus, sides with anti-mandate lawsuit.)

Yes, yes, yes, those vaccine passports, which reminds me that Jorge Mario Bergoglio, who is fully supportive of the “undocumented” and their “right” to break just immigration laws of other nations at will, wanted to see the paperwork of all those seeking to travel with him to various destinations once the vaccine mandates were rolled out, following in short order by the vaccine mandates. He is but a tool of the globalist elites in the construction of a new world order with which a lot of people in Europe have had quite enough (see Right-wing populists make huge gains in European Parliament elections).

It is perhaps apropos at this point to note infants and toddlers today are subjected to a staggering number of “vaccines” and boosters throughout their childhood and adolescence. This was so much the case that cartoonist Gary Larson drew the following Far Side panel in 1987:

The reality of what the “vaccines” developed during former President Donald John Trumps’s warped “Operation Warp Speed” is not funny, and it contrasts sharply with the unreal, ideologically incestuous world in which men such as Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus and his stooge behind the walls of the Occupied Vatican on the West Bank of the Tiber River, Jorge Mario Bergoglio, live and move and have their being.

In addition to the Covid-jab induced phenomenon of Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS), Dr. Peter McCullough has documented how the longstanding phenomenon of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) is entirely caused by those childhood vaccines:

I spoke at Louisiana Health Freedom Day, April, 2024, and met Louisiana State Representative Beryl A. Amedee (R-District 51). She told me about legislation (HB288) that was rejected by the medical examiners and the house of representatives concerning mandatory review of the vaccine record for any death under age 1 without an obvious cause. She felt they were willfully blind to the possibility that a battery of vaccines within a few days could provoke an acute inflammatory reaction resulting in respiratory arrest, in other words, causing the baby to stop breathing (SIDS). I wondered what was the scientific basis for her concern.

Miller reviewed the CDC Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System for death after routine childhood vaccination. Deaths are reported mainly by doctors and health care personnel who have determined the vaccine is the cause of death. Otherwise, it would not be reported given severe fines or federal imprisonment for false entries. So by proxy, all the deaths reported in VAERS are caused by vaccination unless there is a clinical and or autopsy that rules out the vaccine. Miller found:

“Of 2605 infant deaths reported to VAERS from 1990 through 2019, 58 % clustered within 3 days post-vaccination and 78.3 % occurred within 7 days post-vaccination, confirming that infant deaths tend to occur in temporal proximity to vaccine administration. The excess of deaths during these early post-vaccination periods was statistically significant (p < 0.00001). A review of the medical literature substantiates a link between vaccines and sudden unexplained infant deaths.”

Miller found that VAERS is strikingly consistent with seven other sources of data within the medical literature. The most common products implicated was DPT and Infanrix Hexa (diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B (HBV), inactivated poliomyelitis and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) conjugate vaccine) given at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 5 months. Despite public health efforts focussing on sleep position and other factors, SIDS still commonly occurs after a battery of routine infant vaccines.

The 2023 revised package insert for Infanrix lists “Sudden Infant Death Syndrome” as a safety event reported in post-marketing surveillance. So why wouldn’t the Louisiana medical examiners want to know if the baby had just received one of these shots?

The important points of this analysis are that 1) SIDS is very strongly temporally associated with a battery of vaccines given at one sitting, 2) the medical investigative community is willfully blind to vaccination as a cause of serious adverse events including death. Young parents facing this tragedy should request an autopsy, present the vaccine record, and tell their physicians what has happened after the well-baby visit and request the physician report it to VAERS with confirmation of the VAERS number. (https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/routine-vaccines-and-sudden-inf...">Routine Vaccines and Sudden Infant Death: Analysis of VAERS 1990–2019 and Review of the Medical Literatures.)

What is true for Sudden Infant Death Syndrome is also true for the new phenomenon of Sudden Adult Death Syndrome because of the warped “vaccines” produced during Operation Warp Speed then mandated by the Federal government and many state governments as well as private companies, medical and educational facilities for both employees and those seeking entry to access their services:

We previously brought you https://open.substack.com/pub/petermcculloughmd/p/breaking-seattle-king-...">news from King County, Seattle Washington about cardiac arrests from the elite MEDIC ONE EMS system which has the most accurate data in the country. It also happens to be one of the most heavily vaccinated metro areas in America.

www.preprints.org/manuscript/202405.1665/v1">https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202405.1665/v1">Hulscher et al from the www.mcculloughfnd.org/">http://www.mcculloughfnd.org/">McCullough Foundation led a team of investigators that relied on the annual data reports and integrated them with COVID-19 vaccination and population statistics. This is an ecological analysis without individual case record data, so only broad population level inferences can be made.

“Approximately 98% of the King County population received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine by 2023. Our analysis revealed a 25.7% increase in total cardiopulmonary arrests and a 25.4% increase in cardiopulmonary arrest mortality from 2020 to 2023 in King County, WA. Excess cardiopulmonary arrest deaths were estimated to have increased by 1,236% from 2020 to 2023, rising from 11 excess deaths (95% CI: -12, 34) in 2020 to 147 excess deaths (95% CI: 123, 170) in 2023. A quadratic increase in excess cardiopulmonary arrest mortality was observed with higher COVID-19 vaccination rates. The general population of King County sharply declined by 0.94% (21,300) in 2021, deviating from the expected population size. Applying our model from these data to the entire United States yielded 49,240 excess fatal cardiopulmonary arrests from 2021-2023.”

These data are extremely worrisome given the rise in all-cause mortality observed in the United States that has been thoroughly investigated and reported by analyst Edward Dowd in his book www.amazon.com/Cause-Epidemic-Sudden-Childrens-Defense-dp-1648210732/dp/...">https://www.amazon.com/Cause-Epidemic-Sudden-Childrens-Defense-dp-164821...">"Cause Unknown": The Epidemic of Sudden Deaths in 2021 & 2022 & 2023www.amazon.com/Cause-Epidemic-Sudden-Childrens-Defense-dp-1648210732/dp/...">https://www.amazon.com/Cause-Epidemic-Sudden-Childrens-Defense-dp-164821...">. Hulscher and colleagues found despite a pandemic decline in county population, both cardiac arrest events and fatal outcomes increased with vaccination. These findings among many others strongly support removal of all COVID-19 vaccines from public use and immediate clinical and research programs to stem the tide of vaccine cardiac arrests as they occur over the years after injection.

Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH

President, McCullough Foundation (https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/breaking-publication-excess-car...">BREAKING PUBLICATION--Excess Cardiopulmonary Arrest and Mortality after COVID-19 Vaccination in King County, Washington.)

This increase in cardiac arrests is unprecedented. The excess death rate caused by the poisoned jabs has far surpassed even the inflated death rates attributed to the SAR-CoV-2 virus, something that has caught the attention of some members of the Australian Senate, whose government imposed some of the worst concentration camp lockdowns imaginable upon those who refused to get jabbed by the abortion-tainted, genetic altering depopulation poisons marketed as “vaccines”:

(LifeSiteNews) – This week, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released 780,000 previously undisclosed reports about a wide array of adverse effects after COVID-19 vaccination, years after the federal government undertook an intensive campaign to delegitimize such talk as “harmful misinformation.”

The Epoch Times reported that the reports, submitted to the agency’s V-Safe reporting system, allege experiencing heart inflammation, miscarriages, seizures, unconsciousness, Bell’s palsy (a partial and temporary facial paralysis), and more.

One shot recipient reported being taken by ambulance to an emergency room for “loss of consciousness and seizure immediately following injection.” Another reported, “For 24 hrs after shot I was so fatigued I could not stay awake. I also have some very strong suicidal thoughts. Zero appetite.” Still more expressed worry about potential allergic reactions.

The new information was released as a result of a January court order from U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk. It follows V-Safe data previously detailed by civil rights attorney Aaron Siri in a 2022 roundtable hosted by Republican U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin. That data revealed that 800,000 of the system’s 10 million participants, or approximately 7.7 percent, reported needing medical care after COVID injection. “Twenty-five percent of those people needed emergency care or were hospitalized, and another 48 percent sought urgent care,” Siri said at the time. “Also, another 25 percent on top of the 7.7 percent reported being unable to work or go to school.”

“When people report the same symptoms over and over again after getting a biological product — in this case ’shortness of breath’ and ‘heart palpitations,’ which are both symptoms of myocarditis, that has been causally linked to mRNA COVID shots — the public should be warned, not kept in the dark,” National Vaccine Information Center president Barbara Loe Fisher told Epoch of the newest revelations. “It raises questions about what else government health officials are hiding.”

A significant body of evidence links significant risks to the COVID vaccines, which were developed and reviewed in a fraction of the time vaccines usually take under former President Donald Trump’s Operation Warp Speed initiative. Among it, the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) reports 37,231 deaths, 214,906 hospitalizations, 21,524 heart attacks, and 28,214 myocarditis and pericarditis cases as of February 23, among other ailments. CDC researchers have recognized a “high verification rate of reports of myocarditis to VAERS after mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination,” leading to the conclusion that “under-reporting is more likely” than over-reporting.

A 2010 report submitted to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services’ (HHS’s) Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality (AHRQ) warned that VAERS caught “fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events.” On the problem of under-reporting, the VAERS website offers only that “more serious and unexpected medical events are probably more likely to be reported than minor ones” (emphasis added).

In 2021, Project Veritas shed light on some of the reasons for such under-reporting with undercover video from inside Phoenix Indian Medical Center, a facility run under HHS’s Indian Health Service program in which emergency room physician Dr. Maria Gonzales laments that myocarditis cases go unreported “because they want to shove it under the mat,” and nurse Deanna Paris attests to seeing “a lot” of people who “got sick from the side effects” of the COVID shots, but “nobody” is reporting them to VAERS “because it takes over a half hour to write the damn thing.”

Recently, an analysis of 99 million people across eight countries published February in the journal Vaccine – the largest analysis to date – “observed significantly higher risks of myocarditis following the first, second and third doses” of mRNA-based COVID vaccines, as well as signs of increased risk of “pericarditis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis,” and other “potential safety signals that require further investigation.”

In Florida, a grand jury impaneled by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis is currently investigating the manufacture and rollout of the COVID vaccines. In February, it released its first interim report on the underlying justification for Operation Warp Speed, which determined that lockdowns did more harm than good, that masks were ineffective at stopping COVID transmission, that COVID was “statistically almost harmless” to children and most adults, and that it is “highly likely” that COVID hospitalization numbers were inflated. The grand jury’s report on the vaccines themselves is highly anticipated. (CDC discloses 780,000 new reports of serious side effects after COVID-19 vaccination.)

The Australian Senate has begun an inquiry into excess deaths since the mass vaccination program of 2021 in an effort to isolate the causes of what is described as the worst level of excess mortality since World War II. It is being touted as the first instance in the world of a Parliament formally examining the issue.

The successful motion, brought by United Australia Party (UAP) Senator Ralph Babet, was his fifth attempt to launch a parliamentary inquiry in two years. Previously, the left-wing Labor government and the Greens had blocked the motion, without explaining why. The Senate’s Community Affairs References Committee is now required to investigate the factors contributing to the abnormally high mortality. The report is expected by the end of August.

It will be a difficult task, and the likelihood that there will be any admissions of wrongdoing by government bureaucrats and politicians is vanishingly small, even if the findings compellingly point to the vaccination program as the reason behind the excess deaths.

A range of excuses and misdirection will be used to confound the picture. The most obvious is the point that correlation does not prove causation. It will likely be argued that just because the excess deaths happened at about the same time as the mass inoculations it does not necessarily mean there is a causal connection. This is true, but it only means that the evidence is circumstantial, which is valid and can be conclusive, especially when there is no obvious alternative explanation and similar surges in deaths have been observed in most countries that were heavily vaccinated.

here are likely to be arguments about the precision of the data and the establishment of an appropriate base line. There is little doubt about the overall trend. The Australian Actuaries Institute sounded the alarm in early 2023. But a favoured tactic of bureaucrats is to argue over fine detail in order to distract from the big picture.

There will thus need to be work to get precise data, if that is possible. For example, according to Babet on March 26 this year, the Therapeutic Goods Administration’s (TGA) provisional mortality figures “confirm that to November 2023 there were 15,114, or 10 percent, more deaths than the baseline average.”

Different figures are in an article in globalresearch.ca (referencing figures from Mortality Watch). The excess death figures were below 4 percent in 2021, just under 14 percent in 2022, and just over 7 percent in 2023.

The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) has different figures again: -3.1 percent in 2020 (when politicians were saying a deadly pandemic was ravaging the country), 1.4 percent in 2021, 10.9 percent in 2022, and 9.1 percent in 2023. These inconsistencies will have to be resolved.

Ed Dowd, author of Cause Unknown: The Epidemic of Sudden Deaths in 2021 & 2022, observes that Australian data has several limitations, one of which is that it “does not allow us to observe the excess mortality in younger age groups with sufficient detail.” His figures, which are broken down by age, show that the excess deaths were worst for most ages in 2022 and then declined in 2023. The exception was the 75-84 age bracket, where excess deaths rose in 2023.

Another likely tactic is that it will be argued that the problem is “multi-factorial”: that the deaths were caused by many things. This will have some truth to it – the lockdowns probably led to increased suicide rates, for example – and it is likely that it will be used to confuse the picture. But it will not explain the size of the excess mortality, which is the equivalent of what happens in a war. To explain that a novel reason is required, not causes of death that have existed for a long time.

The aggregate mortality statistics are not the only relevant data; there are other pieces of evidence that can help fill in the picture. One is that the excess deaths, which have occurred in all age groups, do not seem to have been the result of COVID itself. According to the ABS in 2022, when the excess deaths were at their peak, the median (average) age of death for COVID-19 was 86, significantly higher than average life expectancy in Australia. That suggests relatively few working age and younger people died from the disease. So, what killed them?

Another pointer is a report that there have been 20 percent more sudden cardiac arrests in Victoria than five years ago – and more than 95 percent of the patients are dying. “Of the 7,830 people whose hearts stopped beating due to this condition in 2022/23, just 388 survived, the latest Ambulance Victoria figures reveal,” reports the Herald Sun. The ABC, the national broadcaster, reported that many of the heart attack victims are young, but did not investigate any further.

The state government’s response has been to buy more defibrillators. There has been no mention of the vaccines as a possible cause despite accumulating evidence that the heart conditions myocarditis and pericarditis are the most commonly reported adverse events associated with the vaccines.

Especially telling has been the TGA’s response. They simply stopped reporting on myocarditis and pericarditis. Such tactics are typical of Australian bureaucrats’ efforts to protect themselves.

The biggest challenge will be analyzing causation of the deaths in an environment where most of the people providing the data have a vested interest in not having their actions exposed, especially when the evidence might show that they have committed a homicide. Australian doctors and academics are also under threat of losing their careers if they voice their doubts about the vaccines. They, too, are hardly likely to be eager to take responsibility for deadly mistakes.

It is more likely that the exposing of the truth in Australia will have to wait for the insights of experts such as Dr. Francis Boyle, who was responsible for drafting the United States’ 1989 Biological Weapons and Antiterrorism Act. He recently testified in a Florida court case that the “mRNA nanoparticle injections” are “biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction.”

If true, it seems very unlikely that Australian health authorities knew. The TGA admitted that it just followed the FDA’s recommendations throughout the crisis. But given that it is supposed to be their job to know it is no excuse. (www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/australian-senate-launches-landmark-excess-de...">https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/australian-senate-launches-landmark-e...">Australian Senate launches landmark excess death inquiry following COVID shot rollout.)

There’s that name again, the name of Dr. Francis Boyle, whose prescient comments in Geopolitics & Empire that were republished in Christian Order over four years ago were the first to identify the Wuhan Institute of Virology as the likely source of the coronavirus and that it was a biological weapon. I, for one, trust that Dr. Boyle’s assessment of the “mRNA nanoparticle injections” are “biological weapons and “weapons of mass destruction” is entirely correct as they are certainly wiping out large numbers of people with the phenomenon reported as “sudden death” without the slightest bit of intellectual inquiry on the part of those who report these devastating stories:

A 25-year-old Bank of America trader suddenly died Thursday –  just two weeks after the shocking death of Leo Lukenas III, a 35-year-old banker who had been working 100-hour work weeks at the financial giant, The Post has learned.

Adnan Deumic, who was based at the bank’s London office, was playing in a casual “five-a-side” charity soccer tournament with other finance employees when he collapsed and was administered CPR, a source with knowledge of the matter said.

No cause of death has been announced, but this person told The Post cardiac arrest is suspected.

“The death of our teammate is a tragedy, and we are shocked by the sudden loss of a popular, young colleague,” a spokesman for Bank of America told The Post. “We are committed to providing our full support to Adnan’s family, his friends and to our many employees grieving his loss.”

There is no known connection between Deumic’s unexpected death and his job at Bank of America. The Swedish-born trader was hired in 2022 and worked on the Credit Portfolio and Algorithmic desk.

Unlike Lukenas, Deumic worked closer to 60 hours a week – but his shift was highly stressful, another source with direct knowledge told The Post.

He was involved in trades worth as much as $1 billion some days despite his lack of experience, the person said.

“He probably worked 11 to 12 hours a day and those hours were incredibly intense… he didn’t have time to get coffee,” the source said.

“The stress he was under was so much more than any of the other analysts… and he couldn’t take a day off. He was learning to do this all when he was very new to the job.”

Before his tragic death, Deumic seemed to be the picture of health, running a marathon in Spain last month and had played hockey in high school.

However, his affable nature hid a growing displeasure with the bank, the source said.

The “abysmal” management didn’t treat him well or give him the bonus or the affirmation he deserved, according to the insider.

It was enough to make Deumic “desperate to get out” and find a similar job at another bank.

“He was not happy… he was looking at other jobs,” the source said.

Deumic was primarily motivated to make enough money so he could move back to Sweden to be nearer his friends, his family and his girlfriend — who had been visiting him this week, the person added.

People who knew Deumic said his colleagues are devastated.

“He was one of the nicest guys on the floor,” the source said. “The interns loved him because he was so open to helping other people even though there was no incentive to.”

Deumic’s death was the second to rock the bank this month. Lukenas, a former Green Beret, died from acute coronary artery thrombus. The married father of two worked in New York. (https://nypost.com/2024/05/17/business/bank-of-america-trader-dies-follo...">Bank of America trader dies following death of Leo Lukenas.)

Sean Burroughs, who threw back-to-back no-hitters in the Little League World Series, has died, Little League International announced Friday. He was 43.

California's Long Beach Little League confirmed Burroughs' death and said in a social media post he "tragically passed away" Thursday. Burroughs' mother, Debbie, told the Southern California News Group her son went into cardiac arrest.

Burroughs' Long Beach team won two Little League World Series championships. He went on to play for four big league teams and won an Olympic gold medal in 2000.

"We at USA Baseball are heartbroken to hear of the tragic passing of Sean," USA Baseball CEO Paul Seiler said in a statement. "Sean was a part of one of our most beloved teams, and he represented our country on and off the field in a first-class manner. Our thoughts and prayers are with the Burroughs family during this time."

Burroughs was found unconscious near his car shortly after he dropped his son, Knox, off for a Little League baseball game, Long Beach Little League President Doug Wittman said. Efforts to revive Burroughs were unsuccessful.

"It was very shocking," Wittman told The Orange County Register. "It's a real sense of family at Long Beach Little League. So, when we lose one of our own, it hurts."

"Sean was a legend in LBLL and the baseball community for winning back-to-back Little League World Series Championships for LBLL in 1992 and 1993," Long Beach Little League wrote in an Instagram post. "To say this is a huge loss is an understatement. ... We will have his family in our thoughts and prayers during this time and try to end the season playing the kind of baseball Coach Sean would be proud of."

Burroughs followed in the footsteps of his father, Jeff Burroughs. The elder Burroughs was named the American League MVP in 1974.

Burroughs spent the first four seasons of his big league career with the San Diego Padres. He was traded to the Tampa Bay Rays in late 2005. After appearing in eight games with the Rays in 2006, Burroughs hit the pause button on his career when he came to the realization he no longer had "the passion" for the game. He also battled substance abuse issues.

"I just didn't have the drive or the passion," Burroughs told ESPN in June 2011. "I was spent physically and spent mentally. It just wasn't there. I was emotionally drained. I still loved the game and respected the game, but I didn't have the drive to go to the park every day. I kind of lost the desire."

He returned to the game in 2011 with the Arizona Diamondbacks. He later appeared in 10 games for the Minnesota Twins before his career came to an end in 2012. (www.foxnews.com/sports/little-league-world-series-hero-olympic-gold-meda...">https://www.foxnews.com/sports/little-league-world-series-hero-olympic-g...">Little League World Series hero, Olympic gold medalist Sean Burroughs 'tragically passed away' at 43.)

Beloved entertainment journalist Sam Rubin died on Friday. He was 64.

Rubin reportedly suffered a heart attack at his home, per TMZ. He was transported to UCLA West Hills by ambulance at the time.

According to Variety, the incident occurred after he conducted his regular Hollywood news segments on KTLA’s 7-9 a.m. “Morning News” program on Friday.

KTLA confirmed his death in a statement on X (formerly known as Twitter).

“KTLA 5 is profoundly saddened to report the death of Sam Rubin. Sam was a giant in the local news industry and the entertainment world, and a fixture of Los Angeles morning television for decades,” the statement read. “His laugh, charm and caring personality touched all who knew him. Sam was a loving husband and father: the roles he cherished the most. Our thoughts are with Sam’s family during this difficult time.”

Rubin, a graduate of LA’s Occidental College, joined KTLA in 1991. He was a staple on red carpets through the years, and hosted the station’s “Live From the Academy Awards” segment. Outside Hollywood, he appeared on BBC’s TV and radio segments and Channel 9 in Australia.

Some of the A-listers he’s interviewed include Zendaya, Mariah Carey, Sting, Usher and Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson.

He was also one of the founding members of the Broadcast Film Critics’ Association and led his own show, “Hollywood Uncensored with Sam Rubin,” for 120 episodes.

Rubin received several accolades during his career. He was also honored by the National Hispanic Media Coalition in 2013, receiving its annual Impact Award for outstanding integrity in broadcast journalism.

Additionally, he was a recipient of a Golden Mic award, a lifetime achievement award from the Southern California Broadcasters Association, and was named the best entertainment reporter by the Los Angeles Press Club.

Rubin is survived by his wife, Leslie, and their four children. (https://nypost.com/2024/05/10/entertainment/sam-rubin-dead-ktla-entertai...">Sam Rubin dead: KTLA entertainment reporter dies at 64.)

The death of a Bank of America associate last week has ignited a firestorm on Wall Street as some bankers slam the toxic work culture they feel contributed to his death — including reported complaints over 100-hour work weeks.

Leo Lukenas III, a former Green Beret who was part of the bank’s Financial Institutions Group, died of “acute coronary artery thrombus” at age 35 last Thursday, according to a Reuters report.

He leaves behind a wife and two young children.

His death came after he had allegedly been working some 100 hours a week for several weeks in a row on a $2 billion merger that was completed last Monday — three days before his tragic death.

Much of the outcry on social media site Reddit from purported bank staffers has been directed at Lukenas’ boss Gary Howe, co-head of the financial institutions group. Howe took down his LinkedIn page during the last few days.

Some employees have reportedly messaged each other about a possible walkout in an effort to bargain for better working conditions, according to popular financial website and chat board Wall Street Oasis.

One post from an anonymous banker highlighted a list of demands for employees’ welfare that generated more than 450 comments in response.

The demands include “proactive policies” that cap work schedules at an average of 80 hours over a seven-day period, and that employees get at least one weekend off per month. It also called for an investigation into Lukenas’ death.

So far, workers have remained at their desks — in part because they fear retribution for raising concerns about the toxic culture, sources said.

A Bank of America spokesperson did not comment about a possible walkout or the accusations of retribution when reached by The Post.

The rep said the bank has no plans to take any action against Howe or to investigate complaints that its junior bankers are forced to put in 100-hour weeks.

“We are very saddened by the loss of our teammate. We continue to focus on doing whatever we can to support the family and our team especially those who worked closely with him,” the BoA spokesperson told The Post.

Howe did not reply to multiple requests for comment.

Lukena, who lived in Brooklyn, had been a Green Beret for more than a decade — from 2013 until he joined the bank as a full-time employee last July — according to his LinkedIn page.

He posted news about the deal between UMB Financial and Heartland Financial on LinkedIn days before his death.

He was a member of 51 Vets, a nonprofit dedicated to connecting transitioning and transitioned veterans from elite military communities with leading businesses, according to its website.

“51 Vets completely changed the trajectory of my post military career. Outstanding organization with an incredible mission,” Lukenas had recently posted on LinkedIn.

A fundraiser for his family, launched by 51 Vets, has already raised $258,962 as of early Thursday afternoon, including $10,000 from hedge fund titan Bill Ackman.

“This was an organic campaign organized by our members,” 51 Vets founder Jordan Selleck told The Post.

“This speaks to the pain in the veteran community and Leo’s reputation in the community.”

“On May 2nd, 2024, 51 Vets lost a father, husband, son, Green Beret and member,” 51 Vets says on its site.

“Leo left behind a wife, and two young children. Leo spent over a decade in Army Special Operations, deploying multiple times with 1st Special Forces Group. He was dedicated to everything he did, never settling for good enough. He always set the example and held himself to the highest standards, prioritizing the team and mission success over himself.”

Lukenas’ dedication to work is why some on Wall Street are quick to link his passing to a culture they believe values wealth over well-being.

While there is no direct evidence to suggest his work had anything to do with his death, numerous studies have linked acute stress to thrombosis.

Lukenas’ shocking death reopened a longstanding debate on Wall Street about a bank’s responsibility to employees.

More than a decade ago, Moritz Erhardt, a 21-year-old intern at Bank of America in London, died after working until 6 a.m. three nights in a row.

A coroner concluded that Erhardt’s death from an epileptic seizure that limited his oxygen supply may have been triggered by fatigue.

Following his death, banks made an effort to restrict employee work hours.

That discussion was reignited in 2021 after a PowerPoint presentation, compiled by 13 Goldman Sachs junior bankers and calling out brutal workweeks, leaked to the popular Wall Street influencer Litquidity.

“What is not ok to me is 110-120 hours over the course of a week! The math is simple, that leaves 4 hours for eating, sleeping, showering bathroom and general transition time. This is beyond the level of ‘hard-working,’ it is inhuman/ abuse,” one analyst wrote at the time.

In response, banks began hiring more staff to lighten junior employees’ workloads and limit hours.

But over the last year, as Wall Street profits dropped and firms prepared for a possible recession, several banks — including Bank of America — cut the workforce once again. (https://nypost.com/2024/05/09/business/wall-street-bankers-death-ignites...">Wall Street banker's death ignites anger at long work weeks, could prompt walkout.)

Former Michigan football star linebacker Obi Ezeh is dead at only 36, according to his mother, who announced the passing on social media on Sunday.

“My very own! My Obi. My #2. My heart. My father’s heart. My quiet giant!” his mother, Nkechy, posted on Facebook. “Grand child of an elephant. Journey well to your maker oo. Mother Mary please hold his hands for me. St. Peter open the gate for him as the celestial choirs marshal him in to Jesus,” the player’s mother, Nkechy Ekere Ezeh, wrote on Facebook.

My Obinna Ezeh, you will always be in my heart my beloved son.”

The 6-foot-4, 244-pound Ezeh played in 50 games for the University of Michigan from 2006 to 2010, according to the Detroit Free Press.

In 2007, he became a freshman All-American and earned an All-Big Ten honorable mention in 2008

Ezeh ended his college career with 293 tackles, three sacks, three fumble recoveries, a pair of interceptions, and eight passing breakups. He also had nine games with ten or more tackles.

Michigan lamented his passing in an X post, saying, “We are saddened to hear about the passing of former Wolverine linebacker Obi Ezeh. Our prayers go out to his family, friends, and former teammates. May he rest in peace.”

No cause of death has yet been reported. (www.breitbart.com/sports/2024/05/06/former-michigan-football-star-obi-ez...">https://www.breitbart.com/sports/2024/05/06/former-michigan-football-sta...">Former Michigan Football Star Obi Ezeh, Dies Suddenly at 36.)

Former NBA player Darius Morris died Saturday at the age of 33.

Morris was selected by the Los Angeles Lakers in the second round of the 2011 NBA Draft.

"With great sadness we announce the passing of our dearly beloved son, Darius Aaron Morris," his family said in a statement, according to TMZ. "During this time of transition, his family asks that you please respect their wishes for privacy and grace."

His first NBA team also posted on social media in his honor.

"We are heartbroken by the passing of Darius Morris," the organization posted on X, formerly Twitter, with a purple heart and a photo of Morris celebrating on the court.

Morris spent two seasons with the Lakers between the pro club and its G-League affiliate, before signing with the Philadelphia 76ers in 2013. He also played for the Clippers and Grizzlies on 10-day contracts that season.

He played his final NBA season in 2014-15 with the Brooklyn Nets.

He played 132 NBA games, starting 17 of them, all of which came in the 2012-13 season.

He averaged 3.3 points per game, but his best performance was his 24-point effort in the first round of the 2013 playoffs as a Laker against the San Antonio Spurs. It was his career high, including regular-season games.

Morris starred at the University of Michigan for two seasons, setting the school record for the most assists in a single season with 235 as a sophomore. That record has since been broken.

His 15 points per game in 2010-11 were also a team high.

No cause of death has been released. (www.foxnews.com/sports/lakers-heartbroken-death-2011-draft-pick-age-33">https://www.foxnews.com/sports/lakers-heartbroken-death-2011-draft-pick-...">Lakers 'heartbroken' over death of 2011 draft pick at age 33.)

Former Red Sox player — and 2004 World Series champion — Dave McCarty died due to a “cardiac event” in California, the team announced Friday.

He was 54 years old.

The team released a statement Friday night, expressing sadness over the loss of the first baseman and outfielder who spent three seasons in Boston.

“Our hearts are heavy with the passing of Dave McCarty. Playing 3 seasons with the Red Sox, he will forever be a part of the curse-breaking 2004 World Series championship team. We send our love to his wife, Monica, and their children, Reid and Maxine,” the team shared on X.

Pitcher Lenny DiNardo, McCarty’s former teammate in Boston during the 2004 and 2005 seasons, also shared a message on social media.

“Just awful news. I was happy to be able to spend time with him at our reunion,” the former lefty pitcher wrote on X.

“Such a great guy. He’ll be missed. Hug your loved ones.”

McCarty was first drafted by the Twins in the first round (third overall) of the 1991 MLB Draft out of Stanford to start his 11-year big league career.

He went on to play 630 games in the majors for seven different teams — the Twins (1993-95), Giants (1995-96), Mariners (1998), Royals (2000-02), Rays (2002), A’s (2003), and Red Sox (2003-05).

McCarty was a part of the Red Sox’s 2004 team, suiting up in 89 regular season games.

McCarty was present at Fenway Park when the team honored the late Tim Wakefield and celebrated the 20th anniversary of the 2004 World Series title, which was the team’s first in 86 years.

In his three seasons with Boston, McCarty held a .286 batting average and .794 OPS and tallied five home runs and 25 RBIs.

After retirement, he served as a NESN analyst from July 2005 through the end of the 2008 season. (https://nypost.com/2024/04/19/sports/2004-red-sox-world-series-champion-...">2004 Red Sox World Series champion Dave McCarty dead at 54.)

When the “sudden and unexpected” becomes the “usual and ordinary” a person with even the smallest amount of curiosity might wonder, “What changed?” Even doctors or scientists might ask that question and would make an effort to answer it. At least one would think so.

Mandisa, a gospel singer who kicked off her singing career as a contestant on "American Idol," died. She was 47.

Mandisa's father, John Hundley, confirmed her death to Fox News Digital, saying it was a shock. It's unclear what caused the singer's death.

Authorities are "conducting an active death investigation stemming from a body that was discovered Thursday evening at a residence," Franklin Police Department Public Information manager Max Wintz told Fox News Digital.

Mandisa competed on season 5 of "American Idol," which aired in 2006. She made it to the top nine in the music competition show. A year later, she released her first full-length album, "True Beauty."

During her time on "American Idol," she became known not only for her powerhouse vocals, but also for an inspiring speech she gave to judge Simon Cowell. After her audition, Cowell made remarks about her weight, and later in the process she confronted him about his comments in a conversation with him and his fellow judges Paula Abdul and Randy Jackson.

"Simon, a lot of people want me to say a lot of things to you," she began. "But this is what I want to say to you is that, yes, you hurt me, and I cried and it was painful. It really was. But I want you to know that I've forgiven you and that you don't need someone to apologize in order to forgive somebody. I figure that if Jesus could die so that all of my wrongs could be forgiven, I can certainly extend that same grace to you."

Cowell immediately gave her a hug, telling her that he felt "humbled," then noting he felt "one millimeter small."

His comments helped inspire the name of her first album. In 2013, she told The Hollywood Reporter, "Coming straight off ‘American Idol,’ and having Simon Cowell talk to me about the way I look, I recorded ‘True Beauty,’ [asking questions like] 'Where am I going to put my value?’, ‘Am I going to determine my worth by people like Simon or am I going to put my trust into what God says about me?’"

The gospel album went on to do well on music charts, landing at no. 43 on the Billboard 200 after its release. It also earned her a Grammy nomination for best pop/contemporary gospel album. (www.foxnews.com/entertainment/american-idol-alum-gospel-singer-mandisa-d...">https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/american-idol-alum-gospel-singer-m...">'American Idol' alum, gospel singer Mandisa dead at 47, police investigating.)

Albany defensive lineman Amitral “AJ” Simon, who had hopes of getting selected in the 2024 NFL Draft, has died, the university announced Wednesday.

He was 25.

No cause of death was provided.

“The UAlbany football program was deeply saddened to learn of the passing of former student-athlete Amitral “AJ” Simon this morning,” the football team said in a statement Wednesday.

“AJ was a tremendous young man and even better teammate throughout his time at UAlbany. He was a role model both on and off the field, serving as a pillar to this program over the last two years. He will be profoundly missed.” (https://nypost.com/2024/04/17/sports/aj-simon-ex-albany-star-and-2024-nf...">AJ Simon, ex-Albany star and 2024 NFL Draft hopeful, dead at 25.)

“One Life to Live” star Amanda Davies, who played the teenage version of her real-life mother Erika Slezak‘s character, Victoria “Viki” Lord, on the long-running ABC soap opera has died. She was 42.

Slezak, 77, confirmed the news of her daughter’s passing on the homepage of her official website.

“It is with great sadness that I share the news of the passing of Erika’s daughter Amanda Elizabeth Davies, who died very suddenly,” a message posted Monday read. “The family is heartbroken and would appreciate privacy at this time.”

At this time, no cause of death has been revealed. (https://nypost.com/2024/01/29/entertainment/one-life-to-live-star-amanda...">'One Life to Live' star Amanda Davies, daughter of soap legend Erika Slezak, dead at 42.)

Shawn Barber, the Canadian pole vault record holder and 2015 world champion, has died from medical complications.

He was 29.

Barber died Wednesday at home in Kingwood, Texas, his agent, Paul Doyle, confirmed to The Associated Press.

A cause of death was not yet known.

Barber had been experiencing health issues.

“More than just an incredible athlete, Shawn was such a good-hearted person that always put others ahead of himself,” Doyle said Thursday. “It’s tragic to lose such a good person at such a young age.”

Barber was a standout pole vaulter at the University of Akron, where he captured back-to-back NCAA indoor championships in 2014 and 2015.

He won the NCAA outdoor crown as well in 2015, before taking gold later that summer at the Pan-Am Games. (https://nypost.com/2024/01/18/sports/shawn-barber-world-champion-pole-va...">Shawn Barber, world champion pole vaulter, dead at 29.)

Golden State Warriors assistant coach Dejan Milojevic died on Wednesday after suffering a heart attack the day prior, the team announced.

“We are absolutely devastated by Dejan Milojević’s sudden passing,” the Warriors said in a statement. “This is a shocking and tragic blow for everyone associated with the Warriors and an incredibly difficult time for his family, friends, and all of us who had the incredible pleasure to work with him.

“… We grieve with and for his wife, Natasa, and their children, Nikola and Masa.”

The 46-year-old Serbian coach was hospitalized in Salt Lake City, Utah, Tuesday night after he suffered a medical emergency at a private team dinner, according to the Warriors.

The NBA postponed Wednesday’s Warriors-Jazz game to an unspecified date due to a “medical emergency in the Warriors family.”

The men’s pro basketball team, BC Crvena zvezda Meridianbet in Serbia, said Milojević died of a heart attack. (https://nypost.com/2024/01/17/sports/warriors-assistant-dejan-milojevic-...">Warriors assistant Dejan Milojevic dead at 46 after heart attack.)

Heart attacks.

Died suddenly.

No cause of death was given.

Cause of death unknown.

This is not normal, ladies and gentlemen, and neither is the fact over sixty—you got, sixty—doctors have died suddenly around the world in the last six months alone: https://makismd.substack.com/p/winter-of-died-suddenly-60-doctors?utm_ca...">Winter of DIED SUDDENLY - 60 DOCTORS from around the world, who died suddenly recently (COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine mandated). Sixty doctors.

Gee, what do you think they have in common?

Getting jabbed?

It does not a degree in epidemiology to figure this out and come to the proper conclusions, which autopsy results around the world are demonstrating in addition to the clinical cases brought to the attention of Dr. Peter A. McCullough.

One living permanently maimed victim of the poisoned jabs has written a poem about his or her experience:

The poem, titled “We’re Not Invisible,” was published under the pseudonymous author Caustly Lessens to pro-freedom Dr. Pierre Kory’s substack and sought to bring awareness to the struggles of those facing COVID vaccine injuries.

“It poignantly details the plight of the Covid mRNA vaccine injured in these dark times of rigid censorship, medical gaslighting, and anti-vaxxer/un-vaxxed demonizing,” Kory wrote of the poem.

The poem is as follows:

We’re Not Invisible

We’re not invisible

We’re here in plain sight

You just refuse to look

And understand our plight

We suffer in silence

As you smother our voice

We trusted the fraud

And made the wrong choice

Some of us have perished

Some of us remain

Those who have been damaged

Will never be the same

Those who have been injured

And in constant pain

These are the people

You seek to blame

You knocked us off balance

With jabs and gaslighting

But we remain steadfast

And we’ll keep on fighting

We’re not invisible

We’re just not recognized

When even friends and family

Leave us feeling ostracized

You still flood the channels

With those deadly lies

As the losses mount

Before our eyes

With your mainstream madness

You deceive with impunity

While only the manufacturers

Are receiving immunity

You’re on the wrong side of history

The wrong side of humanity

The wrong side of morality

And the wrong side of sanity

We stepped into a nightmare

That will not end

But we’re resilient

And we will not bend

When the poisoned apple

Is offered anew

We won’t take a bite

No more witches brew

We’re not invisible

We have names and faces

Yet It seems like you would

Rather erase us

The poem comes as Americans and Canadians alike are increasingly standing up to Big Pharma and Globalist politicians by publicly sharing their vaccine injury stories.

Earlier this month, former CNN anchor Chris Cuomo, who is known for pushing COVID regulations and the experimental vaccines, admitted that he is suffering from side effects from the shot.

“We know that vaccines can have unintended consequences, a.k.a. side effects,” Cuomo said in his opening. “But nobody’s really talking about it because they’re too afraid of blame, and they just want it to go away.”

Similarly, in Canada, pro-vaccine and Liberal funded CBC published a story featuring a Quebec man who developed a severe skin condition after taking Moderna’s mRNA experimental COVID-19 shot.

Like many Canadians, the man is still waiting to receive compensation from Canada’s vaccine injury program, which has only paid out 138 of the 2,233 claims made to the program.

LifeSiteNews has published an extensive amount of research on the dangers of receiving the experimental COVID mRNA jabs, which include heart damage and blood clots.

The mRNA shots have also been linked to a multitude of negative and often severe side effects in children.

Since the vaccine rollout, excess deaths have skyrocketed in countries where the mRNA vaccines were administered en masse. Similarly, CDC recently disclosed 780,000 new reports of serious side effects from the shot.

The latest conservative estimate is that over 17 million worldwide died from receiving the injections, making this the worst man-caused medical catastrophe in history. (www.lifesitenews.com/news/were-not-invisible-patient-injured-by-covid-sh...">https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/were-not-invisible-patient-injured-by-...">'We're not invisible': Patient injured by COVID shot writes moving poem on isolation, suffering .)

Dr. Peter Kory, who published the pseudonymous poem on his website, has reported that there are now forty-seven countries where notice is being taken—and reported upon—about all the excess deaths that have occurred as a result of the “miracle” “vaccines”:

Excess death data from 47 countries in the Western world show that excess mortality has remained high for the last three consecutive years — despite COVID-19 lockdown measures and COVID-19 vaccines, concluded the authors of a peer-reviewed study published Monday in https://bmjpublichealth.bmj.com/content/2/1/e000282">BMJ Public Health.

“This is unprecedented and raises serious concerns,” said the team of Dutch researchers, who analyzed all-cause mortality reported in the “https://ourworldindata.org/excess-mortality-covid">Our World in Data” database.

The open-access database included reports from the https://mortality.org/">Human Mortality Database — known as “the world’s leading scientific data resource on mortality in developed countries” — and the www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7852240/">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7852240/">World Mortality Dataset, which researchers used to track excess mortality during the https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender_category/covid/">COVID-19 pandemic.

In addition to presenting excess death figures, the Dutch authors cited research showing negative https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender_category/health-conditions/">health outcomes related to COVID-19 vaccination programs and lockdown measures.

The researchers called on government leaders and policymakers to “thoroughly investigate underlying causes of persistent excess mortality.”

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/06/04/covid-vaccines-may-have-helped-fuel-...">https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/06/04/covid-vaccines-may-have-help...">The Telegraph — a prominent mainstream U.K. newspaper — today ran a front-page article on the study with the headline, “https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/steve-connolly-obituaries-wo...">Covid vaccines may have helped fuel rise in excess deaths.”

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/jimmy-dore-meryl-nass-who-pa...">Dr. Meryl Nass posted a photo of the article on Substack, writing, “https://merylnass.substack.com/p/the-dam-has-broken-uks-telegraph">The dam has broken.”

Earlier this year, Norwegian researchers published a https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-023-17515-5">peer-reviewed study in BMC Public Health, showing an increase in excess non-COVID-19 mortality — or deaths attributed to causes other than a COVID-19 infection — in Norway in 2021 and 2022. www.trialsitenews.com/a/surge-of-cardiovascular-deaths-in-norway-drives-...">https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/surge-of-cardiovascular-deaths-in-norway...">TrialSite News reported on the Norway study last week.

The study authors noted a “temporal concordance” between Norway’s increase in non-COVID-19 excess mortality and the country’s increase in mRNA COVID-19 vaccination.

https://drpierrekory.com/">Dr. Pierre Kory told https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/">The Defender, “This is unsurprising and totally in line with what we have argued is the effect of the mRNA vaccines.”

Kory — who has written numerous op-eds calling for an investigation into https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/young-people-cancer-crisis-p...">what’s causing excess deaths — said there are “numerous mechanisms of the spike protein used in the shots [that] cause https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/23230-endothelial-dysfunc...">endothelial damage and www.heart.org/en/health-topics/venous-thromboembolism/what-is-excessive-...">https://www.heart.org/en/health-topics/venous-thromboembolism/what-is-ex...">hypercoagulability [excessive blood clotting] leading to heart attacks, strokes, aortic aneurysms.”

“Other mechanisms increase the risk of cancer,” he said, “in particular the ubiquitous findings of https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/dna-contamination-pfizer-cov...">DNA contamination of the vials with cancer-promoting sequences such as https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/chatgpt-ai-covid-vaccine-dna/">SV40.”

‘Every death needs to be acknowledged’

The Dutch team’s study on excess deaths in 47 countries showed that excess mortality in 2020 was documented in 41 of the 47 countries.

Over the next two years, that number increased to 42 and 43 countries in 2021 and 2022, respectively.

Overall, there were 3,098,456 excess deaths from Jan. 1, 2020, to Dec. 31, 2022, with just over 1 million of those occurring in 2020.

“In 2021,” they wrote, “the year in which both containment [i.e., lockdown] measures and COVID-19 https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender_category/toxic-exposures/">vaccines were used to address virus spread and infection, the highest number of excess deaths was reported: 1,256,942 excess deaths.”

They reported that in 2022 — “when most containment measures were lifted and COVID-19 vaccines were continued” — there were 808,392 excess deaths.

The authors pointed out that during the pandemic, politicians and the media emphasized “on a daily basis that every COVID-19 death mattered and every life deserved protection through containment measures and COVID-19 vaccines.”

“In the aftermath of the pandemic, the same morale should apply,” they said. “Every death needs to be acknowledged and accounted for, irrespective of its origin.”

The authors of the Dutch study called for government transparency in cause-of-death data so researchers can do “direct and robust analyses to determine the underlying contributors.”

This also means that autopsies need to be done to determine the exact reason for death, they added.

The Dutch authors noted that the data they analyzed may not have recorded all actual deaths because “countries may lack the infrastructure and capacity to document and account for all deaths.”

Record-keeping mishaps or delays may also cause deaths to go unrecorded.

Cardiovascular deaths driving non-COVID excess mortality in Norway

The Dutch authors’ findings were corroborated by the earlier Norwegian study on https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-023-17515-5">non-COVID-19 excess mortality in Norway from 2020 to 2022.

Researchers at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health analyzed death records in which a COVID-19 infection was not listed as the cause of death to discover the causes of non-COVID-19 excess deaths.

They used data from the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry, known for www.trialsitenews.com/a/surge-of-cardiovascular-deaths-in-norway-drives-...">https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/surge-of-cardiovascular-deaths-in-norway...">high data quality and reliability.

The Norwegian authors found “significant” excess mortality in 2021 and 2022 for all causes (3.7% and 14.5%), for cardiovascular diseases (14.3% and 22.0%), and for malignant tumors in 2022 (3.5%).

When discussing their findings, the authors noted that some people opposed COVID-19 mass vaccination campaigns “due to concerns about potential harmful effects of allegedly insufficiently tested vaccines.”

They noted that the uptick in non-COVID-19 excess deaths happened at the same time that most Norwegians had received an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine — but they were careful to avoid outright stating a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and excess deaths.

“From data available to us, it was not possible to compare excess mortality in vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals,” they said.

They said preliminary analyses from the www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X22013676">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X22013676">National Preparedness Register for COVID-19 in Norway did not show signs of increased mortality among vaccinated older people.

TrialSite News speculated that the study’s authors avoided suggesting that the surge in excess cardiovascular deaths could be tied to Norway’s mass vaccination program because they may have faced difficulty getting their work published.

The Norwegian authors said lockdowns may also have contributed to the increase in non-COVID-19 excess deaths.

“There has been concern that lockdowns have resulted in less use of health care, leading to diseases that otherwise would have been discovered remaining undiagnosed, possibly with increased mortality,” they wrote.

Studies need to be done to assess this possibility, they said.

“Researchers,” they added, “should also investigate whether the [lockdown] restrictions have resulted in deterioration of lifestyle factors, such as less physical activity, a less healthy diet and even social and mental health issues that influence mortality.” (https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/media-covid-vaccine-rise-exc...">‘The Dam Has Broken’: Mainstream Media Reports on Study Showing COVID Vaccines Likely Fueled Rise in Excess Deaths.)

The facts are there, but there are none so blind as those who refuse to see:

They have a mouth, but they speak not: they have eyes, but they see not 17 They have ears, but they hear not: neither is there any breath in their mouths.  18 Let them that make them be like to them: and every one that trusteth in them.  19 Bless the Lord, O house of Israel: bless the Lord, O house of Aaron.  20 Bless the Lord, O house of Levi: you that fear the Lord, bless the Lord.

 21 Blessed be the Lord out of Sion, who dwelleth in Jerusalem. (Psalm 134: 16-20.)

Ultimately, of course, to see the world and the events in it as they are truly one needs to have the spiritual vision provided only by being baptized member of the Catholic Church in a state of Sanctifying Grace, something that Pope Leo XIII pointed out in Mirae Caritas, May 25, 1902:

But alas! we see with sorrow that such men too often proudly flatter themselves that they have conferred upon this world as it were a fresh lease of life and prosperity, inasmuch as by their own energetic action they are urging it on to the race for wealth, to a struggle for the possession of commodities which minister to the love of comfort and display. And yet, whithersoever we turn, we see that human society, if it be estranged from God, instead of enjoying that peace in its possessions for which it had sought, is shaken and tossed like one who is in the agony and heat of fever; for while it anxiously strives for prosperity, and trusts to it alone, it is pursuing an object that ever escapes it, clinging to one that ever eludes the grasp. For as men and states alike necessarily have their being from God, so they can do nothing good except in God through Jesus Christ, through whom every best and choicest gift has ever proceeded and proceeds. But the source and chief of all these gifts is the venerable Eucharist, which not only nourishes and sustains that life the desire whereof demands our most strenuous efforts, but also enhances beyond measure that dignity of man of which in these days we hear so much. For what can be more honourable or a more worthy object of desire than to be made, as far as possible, sharers and partakers in the divine nature? Now this is precisely what Christ does for us in the Eucharist, wherein, after having raised man by the operation of His grace to a supernatural state, he yet more closely associates and unites him with Himself. For there is this difference between the food of the body and that of the soul, that whereas the former is changed into our substance, the latter changes us into its own; so that St. Augustine makes Christ Himself say: "You shall not change Me into yourself as you do the food of your body, but you shall be changed into Me" (confessions 1. vii., c. x.).

Moreover, in this most admirable Sacrament, which is the chief means whereby men are engrafted on the divine nature, men also find the most efficacious help towards progress in every kind of virtue. And first of all in faith. In all ages faith has been attacked; for although it elevates the human mind by bestowing on it the knowledge of the highest truths, yet because, while it makes known the existence of divine mysteries, it yet leaves in obscurity the mode of their being, it is therefore thought to degrade the intellect. But whereas in past times particular articles of faith have been made by turns the object of attack; the seat of war has since been enlarged and extended, until it has come to this, that men deny altogether that there is anything above and beyond nature. Now nothing can be better adapted to promote a renewal of the strength and fervour of faith in the human mind than the mystery of the Eucharist, the "mystery of faith," as it has been most appropriately called. For in this one mystery the entire supernatural order, with all its wealth and variety of wonders, is in a manner summed up and contained: "He hath made a remembrance of His wonderful works, a merciful and gracious Lord; He hath given food to them that fear Him" (Psalm cx, 4-5). For whereas God has subordinated the whole supernatural order to the Incarnation of His Word, in virtue whereof salvation has been restored to the human race, according to those words of the Apostle; "He hath purposed...to re-establish all things in Christ, that are in heaven and on earth, in Him" (Eph. i., 9-10), the Eucharist, according to the testimony of the holy Fathers, should be regarded as in a manner a continuation and extension of the Incarnation. For in and by it the substance of the incarnate Word is united with individual men, and the supreme Sacrifice offered on Calvary is in a wondrous manner renewed, as was signified beforehand by Malachy in the words: "In every place there is sacrifice, and there is offered to My name a pure oblation" (Mal. i., 11). And this miracle, itself the very greatest of its kind, is accompanied by innumerable other miracles; for here all the laws of nature are suspended; the whole substance of the bread and wine are changed into the Body and the Blood; the species of bread and wine are sustained by the divine power without the support of any underlying substance; the Body of Christ is present in many places at the same time, that is to say, wherever the Sacrament is consecrated. And in order that human reason may the more willingly pay its homage to this great mystery, there have not been wanting, as an aid to faith, certain prodigies wrought in His honour, both in ancient times and in our own, of which in more than one place there exist public and notable records and memorials. It is plain that by this Sacrament faith is fed, in it the mind finds its nourishment, the objections of rationalists are brought to naught, and abundant light is thrown on the supernatural order. (Pope Leo XIII, Mirae Caritatis, May 28, 1902.) 

Pope Leo XIII went on to explain that the results of an abandonment of the worthy reception of the Blessed Sacrament and of time spent before It in fervent prayer are tragic for societies, which can be set aright only by the Catholic Faith. There is never any short-cut to the betterment of men and/or the world in which they live at any given point in time. It is the Faith and only the Faith that can help souls to know, to love and to serve God as He has revealed Himself to us exclusively through His Catholic Church, which alone is the repository and infallible explicator all that He has revealed in the Deposit of Faith. To Pope Leo in Mirae Caritatis:

But that decay of faith in divine things of which We have spoken is the effect not only of pride, but also of moral corruption. For if it is true that a strict morality improves the quickness of man's intellectual powers, and if on the other hand, as the maxims of pagan philosophy and the admonitions of divine wisdom combine to teach us, the keenness of the mind is blunted by bodily pleasures, how much more, in the region of revealed truths, do these same pleasures obscure the light of faith, or even, by the just judgment of God, entirely extinguish it. For these pleasures at the present day an insatiable appetite rages, infecting all classes as with an infectious disease, even from tender years. Yet even for so terrible an evil there is a remedy close at hand in the divine Eucharist. For in the first place it puts a check on lust by increasing charity, according to the words of St. Augustine, who says, speaking of charity, "As it grows, lust diminishes; when it reaches perfection, lust is no more" (De diversis quaestionibus, Ixxxiii., q. 36). Moreover the most chaste flesh of Jesus keeps down the rebellion of our flesh, as St. Cyril of Alexandria taught, "For Christ abiding in us lulls to sleep the law of the flesh which rages in our members" (Lib. iv., c. ii., in Joan., vi., 57). Then too the special and most pleasant fruit of the Eucharist is that which is signified in the words of the prophet: "What is the good thing of Him," that is, of Christ, "and what is His beautiful thing, but the corn of the elect and the wine that engendereth virgins" (Zach. ix., 17), producing, in other words, that flower and fruitage of a strong and constant purpose of virginity which, even in an age enervated by luxury, is daily multiplied and spread abroad in the Catholic Church, with those advantages to religion and to human society, wherever it is found, which are plain to see. (Pope Leo XIII, Mirae Caritas, May 28, 1902.)

Yes, the keenness of the mind is blunted by the sort of bodily pleasures that most people in the world  have partaken throughout the course of their adult lives. Such men can never come to act in a truly wise manner as they respond to the provocations of the moment and are without any thought about horror of, no less possessing any remorse for, their own personal sins. Men who live in such a way will always be lost in a sea of confusion that will never lift from their minds until they embrace the true Faith and make a good, integral Confession of their sins to a true priest. It is after such a conversion that one can come to grow spiritually as an adorer of Our Blessed Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ in His Real Presence before the Blessed Sacrament. Those who spend such time with Christ the King receive infused graces into their souls.

Pope Leo XII noted the ineffable ability of the Blessed Sacrament to quicken the mind and strengthen the will:

To this it must be added that by this same Sacrament our hope of everlasting blessedness, based on our trust in the divine assistance, is wonderfully strengthened. For the edge of that longing for happiness which is so deeply rooted in the hearts of all men from their birth is whetted even more and more by the experience of the deceitfulness of earthly goods, by the unjust violence of wicked men, and by all those other afflictions to which mind and body are subject. Now the venerable Sacrament of the Eucharist is both the source and the pledge of blessedness and of glory, and this, not for the soul alone, but for the body also. For it enriches the soul with an abundance of heavenly blessings, and fills it with a sweet joy which far surpasses man's hope and expectations; it sustains him in adversity, strengthens him in the spiritual combat, preserves him for life everlasting, and as a special provision for the journey accompanies him thither. And in the frail and perishable body that divine Host, which is the immortal Body of Christ, implants a principle of resurrection, a seed of immortality, which one day must germinate. That to this source man's soul and body will be indebted for both these boons has been the constant teaching of the Church, which has dutifully reaffirmed the affirmation of Christ: "He that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood hath everlasting life; and I will raise him up at the last day" (St. John vi., 55).

In connection with this matter it is of importance to consider that in the Eucharist, seeing that it was instituted by Christ as "a perpetual memorial of His Passion" (Opusc. Ivii. Offic. de festo Corporis Christi), is proclaimed to the Christian the necessity of a salutary selfchastisement. For Jesus said to those first priests of His: "Do this in memory of Me" (Luke xxii, 18); that is to say, do this for the commemoration of My pains, My sorrows, My grievous afflictions, My death upon the Cross. Wherefore this Sacrament is at the same time a Sacrifice, seasonable throughout the entire period of our penance; and it is likewise a standing exhortation to all manner of toil, and a solemn and severe rebuke to those carnal pleasures which some are not ashamed so highly to praise and extol: "As often as ye shall eat this bread, and drink this chalice, ye shall announce the death of the Lord, until He come" (1 Cor. xi., 26).

Furthermore, if anyone will diligently examine into the causes of the evils of our day, he will find that they arise from this, that as charity towards God has grown cold, the mutual charity of men among themselves has likewise cooled. Men have forgotten that they are children of God and brethren in Jesus Christ; they care for nothing except their own individual interests; the interests and the rights of others they not only make light of, but often attack and invade. Hence frequent disturbances and strifes between class and class: arrogance, oppression, fraud on the part of the more powerful: misery, envy, and turbulence among the poor. These are evils for which it is in vain to seek a remedy in legislation, in threats of penalties to be incurred, or in any other device of merely human prudence. Our chief care and endeavour ought to be, according to the admonitions which We have more than once given at considerable length, to secure the union of classes in a mutual interchange of dutiful services, a union which, having its origin in God, shall issue in deeds that reflect the true spirit of Jesus Christ and a genuine charity. This charity Christ brought into the world, with it He would have all hearts on fire. For it alone is capable of affording to soul and body alike, even in this life, a foretaste of blessedness; since it restrains man's inordinate self-love, and puts a check on avarice, which "is the root of all evil" (1 Tim. vi., 10). And whereas it is right to uphold all the claims of justice as between the various classes of society, nevertheless it is only with the efficacious aid of charity, which tempers justice, that the "equality" which St. Paul commended (2 Cor. viii., 14), and which is so salutary for human society, can be established and maintained. This then is what Christ intended when he instituted this Venerable Sacrament, namely, by awakening charity towards God to promote mutual charity among men. For the latter, as is plain, is by its very nature rooted in the former, and springs from it by a kind of spontaneous growth. Nor is it possible that there should be any lack of charity among men, or rather it must needs be enkindled and flourish, if men would but ponder well the charity which Christ has shown in this Sacrament. For in it He has not only given a splendid manifestation of His power and wisdom, but "has in a manner poured out the riches of His divine love towards men" (Conc. Trid., Sess. XIII., De Euch. c. ii.). Having before our eyes this noble example set us by Christ, Who bestows on us all that He has assuredly we ought to love and help one another to the utmost, being daily more closely united by the strong bond of brotherhood. Add to this that the outward and visible elements of this Sacrament supply a singularly appropriate stimulus to union. On this topic St. Cyprian writes: "In a word the Lord's sacrifice symbolises the oneness of heart, guaranteed by a persevering and inviolable charity, which should prevail among Christians. For when our Lord calls His Body bread, a substance which is kneaded together out of many grains, He indicates that we His people, whom He sustains, are bound together in close union; and when He speaks of His Blood as wine, in which the juice pressed from many clusters of grapes is mingled in one fluid, He likewise indicates that we His flock are by the commingling of a multitude of persons made one" (Ep. 96 ad Magnum n. 5 (al.6)). In like manner the angelic Doctor, adopting the sentiments of St. Augustine (Tract. xxxvi., in Joan nn. 13, 17), writes: "Our Lord has bequeathed to us His Body and Blood under the form of substances in which a multitude of things have been reduced to unity, for one of them, namely bread, consisting as it does of many grains is yet one, and the other, that is to say wine, has its unity of being from the confluent juice of many grapes; and therefore St. Augustine elsewhere says: 'O Sacrament of mercy, O sign of unity, O bond of charity!' " (Summ. Theol. P. III., q. Ixxix., a. 1. . All of which is confirmed by the declaration of the Council of Trent that Christ left the Eucharist in His Church "as a symbol of that unity and charity whereby He would have all Christians mutually joined and united. . . a symbol of that one body of which He is Himself the head, and to which He would have us, as members attached by the closest bonds of faith, hope, and charity" (Conc. Trid., Sess. XIII., De Euchar., c. ii.). The same idea had been expressed by St. Paul when he wrote: "For we, being many, are one bread, one body, all we who partake of the one bread" (I Cor. x., 17). Very beautiful and joyful too is the spectacle of Christian brotherhood and social equality which is afforded when men of all conditions, gentle and simple, rich and poor, learned and unlearned, gather round the holy altar, all sharing alike in this heavenly banquet. And if in the records of the Church it is deservedly reckoned to the special credit of its first ages that "the multitude of the believers had but one heart and one soul" (Acts iv., 32), there can be no shadow of doubt that this immense blessing was due to their frequent meetings at the Divine table; for we find it recorded of them: "They were persevering in the doctrine of the Apostles and in the communion of the breaking of bread" (Acts ii., 42).

Besides all this, the grace of mutual charity among the living, which derives from the Sacrament of the Eucharist so great an increase of strength, is further extended by virtue of the Sacrifice to all those who are numbered in the Communion of Saints. For the Communion of Saints, as everyone knows, is nothing but the mutual communication of help, expiation, prayers, blessings, among all the faithful, who, whether they have already attained to the heavenly country, or are detained in the purgatorial fire, or are yet exiles here on earth, all enjoy the common franchise of that city whereof Christ is the head, and the constitution is charity. For faith teaches us, that although the venerable Sacrifice may be lawfully offered to God alone, yet it may be celebrated in honour of the saints reigning in heaven with God Who has crowned them, in order that we may gain for ourselves their patronage. And it may also be offered-in accordance with an apostolic tradition-for the purpose of expiating the sins of those of the brethren who, having died in the Lord, have not yet fully paid the penalty of their transgressions.

That genuine charity, therefore, which knows how to do and to suffer all things for the salvation and the benefit of all, leaps forth with all the heat and energy of a flame from that most holy Eucharist in which Christ Himself is present and lives, in which He indulges to the utmost. His love towards us, and under the impulse of that divine love ceaselessly renews His Sacrifice. And thus it is not difficult to see whence the arduous labours of apostolic men, and whence those innumerable designs of every kind for the welfare of the human race which have been set on foot among Catholics, derive their origin, their strength, their permanence, their success. (Pope Leo XIII, Mirae Caritatis, May 28, 1902.) 

When was the last time you heard someone in public life citing the example of Saint Henry the Emperor or Saint Edward the Confessor or Saint Stephen of Hungary or Saint Wenceslaus of Bohemia or Saint Louis IX, King of France, or Saint Casimir of Poland or Saint Elizabeth of Hungary as the example of civil leadership that would shape their own exercise of civil power? No, candidates for public office cite the "plaster saints" of Modernity who reject the Social Reign of Christ the King as their models for civil governance, believing in the "sovereignty of the people" and/or in some sort of nebulous, generic "common ground" about God that is of the essence of the naturalism of Judeo-Masonry.

Concluding Remarks

 perhaps it would be good to consider the following words from Pope Pius XII’s encyclical letter on the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus in order to contrast the spirit of hatred that motivates the leaders of this passing world with the tender mercies of the Divine Redeemer, Christ the King, Who was made manifest to the Gentile Kings on the Feast of the Epiphany, January 6, that is still observed as octave in those chapels that adhere to the General Roman Calendar of 1954.

Pope Pius XII emphasized that devotion to the Most Sacred Heart is not “burdensome” and is at the heart of fighting for Christ the King and His rights in the midst of a world that is cold and hostile to Him:

8. The Church has always valued, and still does, the devotion to the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus so highly that she provides for the spread of it among Christian peoples everywhere and by every means. At the same time she uses every effort to protect it against the charges of so-called “naturalism” and “sentimentalism.” In spite of this it is much to be regretted that, both in the past and in our own times, this most noble devotion does not find a place of honor and esteem among certain Christians and even occasionally not among those who profess themselves moved by zeal for the Catholic religion and the attainment of holiness.

9. “If you but knew the gift of God.”[7] With these words, venerable brethren, We who in the secret designs of God have been elected as the guardians and stewards of the sacred treasures of faith and piety which the divine Redeemer has entrusted to His Church, prompted by Our sense of duty, admonish them all.

10. For even though the devotion to the Sacred Heart of Jesus has triumphed so to speak, over the errors and the neglect of men, and has penetrated entirely His Mystical Body; still there are some of Our children who, led astray by prejudices, sometimes go so far as to consider this devotion ill-adapted, not to say detrimental, to the more pressing spiritual needs of the Church and humanity in this present age. There are some who, confusing and confounding the primary nature of this devotion with various individual forms of piety which the Church approves and encourages but does not command, regard this as a kind of additional practice which each one may take up or not according to his own inclination.

11. There are others who reckon this same devotion burdensome and of little or no use to men who are fighting in the army of the divine King and who are inspired mainly by the thought of laboring with their own strength, their own resources and expenditures of their own time, to defend Catholic truth, to teach and spread it, to instill Christian social teachings, to promote those acts of religion and those undertakings which they consider much more necessary today. (Pope Pius XII, Haurietis Aquas, May 15, 1956.)

A Brief Comment:

Paragraph 11, above, summarizes the beliefs of so many Catholics who permit themselves to be drawn into the agitation of the conflicts between the false opposites of the naturalist “left” and “right” that are simply manifestations of the anti-Incarnational Judeo-Masonic spirit of Modernity and can never be in the service of promoting a genuine social order.

Pope Pius XII went on to explain the attitude of those who consider devotion to the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus to be suited only for women and not for “educated men” even though it is a strong antidote to the sophistries of Modernity:

12. Again, there are those who so far from considering this devotion a strong support for the right ordering and renewal of Christian morals both in the individual’s private life and in the home circle, see it rather a type of piety nourished not by the soul and mind but by the senses and consequently more suited to the use of women, since it seems to them something not quite suitable for educated men.

13. Moreover there are those who consider a devotion of this kind as primarily demanding penance, expiation and the other virtues which they call “passive,” meaning thereby that they produce no external results. Hence they do not think it suitable to re-enkindle the spirit of piety in modern times. Rather, this should aim at open and vigorous action, at the triumph of the Catholic faith, at a strong defense of Christian morals. Christian morality today, as everyone knows, is easily contaminated by the sophistries of those who are indifferent to any form of religion, and who, discarding all distinctions between truth and falsehood, whether in thought or in practice, accept even the most ignoble corruptions of materialistic atheism, or as they call it, secularism.

14. Who does not see, venerable brethren, that opinions of this kind are in entire disagreement with the teachings which Our predecessors officially proclaimed from this seat of truth when approving the devotion to the Sacred Heart of Jesus.? Who would be so bold as to call that devotion useless and inappropriate to our age which Our predecessor of immortal memory, Leo XIII, declared to be “the most acceptable form of piety?” He had no doubt that in it there was a powerful remedy for the healing of those very evils which today also, and beyond question in a wider and more serious way, bring distress and disquiet to individuals and to the whole human race. “This devotion,” he said, “which We recommend to all, will be profitable to all.” And he added this counsel and encouragement with reference to the devotion to the Sacred Heart of Jesus: “. . .hence those forces of evil which have now for so long a time been taking root and which so fiercely compel us to seek help from Him by Whose strength alone they can be driven away. Who can He be but Jesus Christ, the only begotten Son of God? ‘For there is no other name under heaven given to men whereby we must be saved.’[8] We must have recourse to Him Who is the Way, the Truth, and the Life.”[9]

15. No less to be approved, no less suitable for the fostering of Christian piety was this devotion declared to be by Our predecessor of happy memory, Pius XI. In an encyclical letter he wrote: “Is not a summary of all our religion and, moreover, a guide to a more perfect life contained in this one devotion? Indeed, it more easily leads our minds to know Christ the Lord intimately and more effectively turns our hearts to love Him more ardently and to imitate Him more perfectly.”[10]

16. To Us, no less than to Our predecessors, these capital truths are clear and certain. When We took up Our office of Supreme Pontiff and saw, in full accord with Our prayers and desires, that the devotion to the Sacred Heart of Jesus had increased and was actually, so to speak, making triumphal progress among Christian peoples, We rejoiced that from it were flowing through the whole Church innumerable and salutary results. This We were pleased to point out in Our first encyclical letter.[11]

17. Through the years of Our pontificate — years filled not only with bitter hardships but also with ineffable consolations these effects have not diminished in number or power or beauty, but on the contrary have increased. Indeed, happily there has begun a variety of projects which are conducive to a rekindling of this devotion. We refer to the formation of cultural associations for the advancement of religion and of charitable works; publications setting forth the true historical, ascetical and mystical doctrine concerning this entire subject; pious works of atonement; and in particular those manifestations of most ardent piety which the Apostleship of Prayer has brought about, under whose auspices and direction local gatherings — families, colleges, institutions — and sometimes nations have been consecrated to the Sacred Heart of Jesus. To all these We have offered paternal congratulations on many occasions, whether in letters written on the subject, in personal addresses, or even in messages delivered over the radio.[12]

18. Therefore when We perceive so fruitful an abundance of healing waters, that is, heavenly gifts of divine love, issuing from the Sacred Heart of our Redeemer, spreading among countless children of the Catholic Church by the inspiration and action of the divine Spirit; We can only exhort you, venerable brethren, with fatherly affection to join Us in giving tribute of praise and heartfelt thanks to God, the Giver of all good gifts. We make Our own these words of the Apostle of the Gentiles: “Now to Him Who is able to do all things more abundantly than we desire or understand, according to the power that worketh in us, to Him be glory in the Church and in Christ Jesus unto all generations world without end. Amen.”[13]

19. But after We have paid Our debt of thanks to the Eternal God, We wish to urge on you and on all Our beloved children of the Church a more earnest consideration of those principles which take their origin from Scripture and the teaching of the Fathers and theologians and on which, as on solid foundations, the worship of the Sacred Heart of Jesus rests. We are absolutely convinced that not until we have made a profound study of the primary and loftier nature of this devotion with the aid of the light of the divinely revealed truth, can we rightly and fully appreciate its incomparable excellence and the inexhaustible abundance of its heavenly favors. Likewise by devout meditation and contemplation of the innumerable benefits produced from it, we will be able to celebrate worthily the completion of the first hundred years since the observance of the feast of the Sacred Heart of Jesus was extended to the Universal Church. (Pope Pius  XII, Haurietis Aquas, May 15, 1956.)

Our last true Holy Father thus far explained the spirit of the hatred of God that was at work in the world sixty-six years ago and can be said to be at the foundation of modern politics as nihilists of the “left” and the “right” eschew the life-giving waters of the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus and the truths of the Holy Faith that can and do lift the minds and hearts of men to the things that eternal, in the light of which all things earthy must be judged: 

117. And there is more. For if We experience bitter sorrow at the feeble loyalty of the good in whose souls, tricked by a deceptive desire for earthly possessions, the fire of divine charity grows cool and gradually dies out, much more is Our heart deeply grieved by the machinations of evil men who, as if instigated by Satan himself, are now more than ever zealous in their open and implacable hatred against God, against the Church and above all against him who on earth represents the Person of the divine Redeemer and exhibits His love towards men, in accordance with that well-known saying of the Doctor of Milan: “For (Peter) is being questioned about that which is uncertain, though the Lord is not uncertain; He is questioning not that He may learn, but that He may teach the one whom, at His ascent into Heaven, He was leaving to us as ‘the representative of His love.'”[116]

118. But, in truth, hatred of God and of those who lawfully act in His place is the greatest kind of sin that can be committed by man created in the image and likeness of God and destined to enjoy His perfect and enduring friendship for ever in heaven. Man, by hatred of God more than by anything else, is cut off from the Highest Good and is driven to cast aside from himself and from those near to him whatever has its origin in God, whatever is united with God, whatever leads to the enjoyment of God, that is, truth, virtue, peace and justice.[117]

119. Since then, alas, one can see that the number of those whose boast is that they are God’s enemies is in some places increasing, that the false slogans of materialism are being spread by act and argument, and unbridled license for unlawful desires is everywhere being praised, is it remarkable that love, which is the supreme law of the Christian religion, the surest foundation of true and perfect justice and the chief source of peace and innocent pleasures, loses its warmth in the souls of many? For as our Savior warned us: “Because iniquity hath abounded, the charity of many shall grow cold.”[118]

120. When so many evils meet Our gaze — such as cause sharp conflict among individuals, families, nations and the whole world, particularly today more than at any other time — where are We to seek a remedy, venerable brethren? Can a form of devotion surpassing that to the most Sacred Heart of Jesus be found, which corresponds better to the essential character of the Catholic faith, which is more capable of assisting the present-day needs of the Church and the human race? What religious practice is more excellent, more attractive, more salutary than this, since the devotion in question is entirely directed towards the love of God itself?[119] (Pope Pius XII, Haurietis Aquas, May 15, 1956.)

Pope Pius XII was referring to the false slogans of materialism being spread by Communists sixty-six years ago, but we know only too well that Communist apologists, if not actual Communists, hold the levers of global power today, including here in the United States of America, where many “respected” opinion-makers believe that the time has come for a formal censorship of any speech that is opposed to “democracy,” meaning opposed to the statist/globalist program for the New World Order. The charity of men hath indeed grown cold because of men’s hatred of God, and it is an easy thing to hate His rational creatures if one hates the very Creator, Redeemer, and Sanctifier. Hence the reason for so much violent crime today and its indemnification by prosecutors who care not for the protection of innocent life but do everything imaginable to defend and excuse the guilty so that they can kill and maraud again and again.

Linking devotion to the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus with devotion to the Immaculate Heart of Mary, Pope Pius XII explained that a rekindling of a love for God in the hearts of men would lead to the reconstruction of a just social order on the right principles of the true Faith:

123. Finally, moved by an earnest desire to set strong bulwarks against the wicked designs of those who hate God and the Church and, at the same time, to lead men back again, in their private and public life, to a love of God and their neighbor, We do not hesitate to declare that devotion to the Sacred Heart of Jesus is the most effective school of the love of God; the love of God, We say, which must be the foundation on which to build the kingdom of God in the hearts of individuals, families, and nations, as that same predecessor of pious memory wisely reminds us: “The reign of Jesus Christ takes its strength and form from divine love: to love with holiness and order is its foundation and its perfection. From it these must flow: to perform duties without blame; to take away nothing of another’s right; to guide the lower human affairs by heavenly principles; to give the love of God precedence over all other creatures.”[124]

124. In order that favors in greater abundance may flow on all Christians, nay, on the whole human race, from the devotion to the most Sacred Heart of Jesus, let the faithful see to it that to this devotion the Immaculate Heart of the Mother of God is closely joined. For, by God’s Will, in carrying out the work of human Redemption the Blessed Virgin Mary was inseparably linked with Christ in such a manner that our salvation sprang from the love and the sufferings of Jesus Christ to which the love and sorrows of His Mother were intimately united. It is, then, entirely fitting that the Christian people — who received the divine life from Christ through Mary — after they have paid their debt of honor to the Sacred Heart of Jesus should also offer to the most loving Heart of their heavenly Mother the corresponding acts of piety affection, gratitude and expiation. Entirely in keeping with this most sweet and wise disposition of divine Providence is the memorable act of consecration by which We Ourselves solemnly dedicated Holy Church and the whole world to the spotless Heart of the Blessed Virgin Mary.[125] (Pope Pius XII, Haurietis Aquas, May 15, 1956.)

Men and their nations must necessarily fall under the cruel tyranny of the adversary and his minions when they turn away from the Catholic Church and the Social Reign of Christ the King.

Today, Monday, June 10, 2024, is the semi-double feast of Saint Margaret of Scotland within the Octave of the Most Sacred Heart of Jesus. Saint Margaret was inflamed with love for the Prince of Peace Himself and sought to effect peace even within her own family.

We are eleven hundred years removed from the time when a valiantly saintly woman, Saint Margaret of Scotland, was called to lead her beloved kingdom at a time of great turmoil caused by the vagaries of fallen human nature. Saint Margaret rode on horseback to make peace between her own husband and their son at a time when they were literally at war with each other. The Queen of Scotland sought to establish peace and order as a Catholic who subordinated her own life to the sweet yoke of Christ the King as she sought the temporal and eternal good of souls.

Dom Prosper Gueranger, O.S.B.’s narrative of our Saint provides quite a contrast to our times of conflict based not merely upon the vagaries of fallen human nature but principally upon the results of the metastatic growth of errors and thus of the preponderance of sin over virtue in the hearts and souls of men and thus of their nations:

Scotland had long been Christian, when Margaret was given to her, not to lead her to the baptismal font, but to establish, amidst a population so diversified and so often at mutual enmity, as was hers, that unity which makes a Nation. Ancient Caledonia defended by her lakes, mountains, and rivers, had, up to the fall of the Roman empire, kept her independence. But while herself inaccessible to invading troops, she had become the refuge of the vanquished of every race, and the proscribed of every epoch. Many an advancing wave that had paused and crouched at the feet of her granite frontiers had swept pitilessly over the Southern provinces of the great British island. Britons, Saxons, and Danes in turn, dispossessed and driven from their homes, fleeing northwards had successively crept in, and settling down, as best they might, had maintained their own customs, in juxtaposition with those of the first inhabitants, adding consequently their own mutual jealousies to the inveterate divisions of the Picts and Scots. But from the very evil itself, the remedy was to come. God, in order to show that he is master of revolutions, just as he is of the surging waves, was about to confide the execution of his merciful designs upon Scotland, to such casual instruments as a storm or a political overthrow may sometimes prove to be. 

At the opening of the eleventh century, Danish invasion had driven from the English shore the sons of the Saxon king, Edmund Ironside. The crowned apostle of Hungary, Saint Stephen I, generously received the fugitives at his court, welcoming in these helpless children, the great-nephews of a Saint, namely Edward the Martyr. To the eldest, he gave his own daughter in marriage, and the second he affianced to the niece of St. Henry, Emperor of Germany. Of this last mentioned union, were born three children, Edgar, surnamed Atheling, Christian afterwards a nun, and Margaret whose feast the Church is keeping today. Ere long by the turning tide of fortune, the exile once more returned to their country and Edgar was brought to the very steps of the English throne. For in the meanwhile, the scepter had passed from the Danish princes, back again to the Saxon line, in the person of their uncle, Saint Edward the Confessor, and by very birth-right, seemed destined to pass ultimately to Edgar Atheling. But almost immediately after their return from exile, the death of St. Edward and the Norman conquest, again banished the royal Saxon family. The ship bearing these noble fugitives, bound for the continent, was driven in an opposite direction by a hurricane, and stranded on the Scottish shore. Edgar Atheling, despite the efforts of the Saxon party, was never to raise up the fallen throne of his sires; but his sister, the Saint of this day, made conquest of the land whither the storm, God’s instrument, had carried her. (Dom Prosper Gueranger, O.S.B., The Liturgical Year, The Feast of Saint Margaret of Scotland, June 10.)

One can see here the felicitous charity of Saint Stephen of Hungary, who, we should remember, had a holy son, Saint Emerick, after whom Amerigo Vespucci was named, for fellow Catholic monarchs, whose were known for their own works of charity and justice, at times when they had to seek refuge away from their homelands. A world based on Catholic principles will not be free of wars and divisions. However, as those who know true history understand, Christendom did produce countless numbers of truly saintly rulers who governed for the great honor and glory of the Most Holy Trinity and who kept uppermost in their minds the simple fact that it is impossible for men to know any semblance of order in their kingdoms (nations) when they are at war with God by means of their unrepentant sins.

Pope Pius XII made this point in his first encyclical letter, Summi Pontificatus, October 10, 1939:

It is true that even when Europe had a cohesion of brotherhood through identical ideals gathered from Christian preaching, she was not free from divisions, convulsions and wars which laid her waste; but perhaps they never felt the intense pessimism of today as to the possibility of settling them, for they had then an effective moral sense of the just and of the unjust, of the lawful and of the unlawful, which, by restraining outbreaks of passion, left the way open to an honorable settlement. In Our days, on the contrary, dissensions come not only from the surge of rebellious passion, but also from a deep spiritual crisis which has overthrown the sound principles of private and public morality. (Pope Pius XII, Summi Pontificatus, October 10, 1939.)

During the era of Christendom, however, there were Catholic monarchs who healed bitter divisions by appealing to the common bond of the Catholic Faith that bound men together in this life as a preparation for a joyful and glorious reunion without any divisions in eternity, and this is what Saint Margaret of Scotland effect in the kingdom that became her own because of her marriage to King Malcolm III:

Having become the wife of Malcolm III, her gentle influence softened the fierce instincts of the son of a Duncan, and triumphed over the barbarism still so dominant in those parts of the country, as to separate them utterly from the rest of the known world. The fierce highlander and haughty lowlander, reconciled at last, now followed their gentle queen along hitherto unknown paths, thrown open by her to the light of the Gospel. The strong now bent him down to meet the weak or the poor; and all alike, casting aside the rigidity of their hardy race, let themselves be captured by the alluring charms of Christian charity. Holy penitence resumed its rights over the gross instincts of mere nature. The frequentation of the sacraments once more brought into esteem, produced seasonable fruits. Everywhere, whether in Church or in state, abuses vanished. The whole kingdom became one family, whereof Margaret was called the Mother; for Scotland was born by her to true civilization. David I (inscribed like his mother in the catalogue of Saints) completed the work begun by her; and another child of Margaret’s, alike worthy of her, Matilda of Scotland, surnamed the “good Queen Maude,” was married to Henry I of England; and thus, an end was put on the English soil, to the persistent rivalries of victors and vanquished, by this admixture of Saxon blood with the Norman race. (Dom Prosper Gueranger, O.S.B., The Liturgical Year, Feast of Saint Margaret of Scotland, June 10.)

Reconciliations such as those brought about by the prayers, sacrifice and loving nature of Saint Margaret of Scotland are not about to happen in the United States of America anytime soon as this nation is founded on such a welter of anti-Incarnational, Judeo-Masonic errors that have finally begun to manifest the perfection of the inherent degeneracy of the founding principles.

Turn away from the conflicts between the false opposites of the naturalist “left” and “right” that are nothing other than sideshows concocted in the laboratories of hell and designed to convince men that it is through violent confrontations that injustices can be remedied and a sense of “liberty” that has always been licentiousness and not true liberty can be “enjoyed” again while the sociopaths who plotted to kill, maim, and sterilize people with their biological, depopulating weapons injected into the bodies of unsuspecting victims with a syringe after having first plotted a genocide against the preborn and thence on all the vulnerable thereafter (“brain death”/human organ vivisection, the starvation and dehydration of brain-damaged human beings, “palliative care”/hospice, direct euthanasia, assisted-suicide) are vanquished by the Triumph of the Immaculate Heart of  Mary.

Rembember, it is only by adherence to our Catholic Faith as we prostrate ourselves before Our Eucharistic King and pledge ourselves to His Most Sacred Heart through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary that we can find a remedy in the souls of individual men to help them overcome the conflicts and agitations of the moment and thus rise to the heights of personal sanctity.

This world in which we live is passing away. The triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary will be made manifest ‘ere long. We must be focused on the sanctification and salvation of our own immortal souls as we keep our First Friday devotions with fervor and pray Our Lady’s Most Holy Rosary every day, including on each First Saturday for the intentions specified by the Mother of God in the Cova da Iria near Fatima, Portugal, and to Sister Lucia dos Santos in Tuy, Spain.

Put your trust in the Most Sacred Heart of Christ the King and the Immaculate Heart of Mary, praying as many Rosaries each day as one’s state-in-life permits.

Vivat Christus Rex!

Vivat Regina Mariae Immaculate!

Our Lady of the Rosary, pray for  us.

Saint Joseph, pray for us.

Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us. 

Saint John the Baptist, pray for us.

Saint John the Evangelist, pray for us.

Saint Michael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Gabriel the Archangel, pray for us.

Saint Raphael the Archangel, pray for us.

Saints Joachim and Anne, pray for us. 

Saints Caspar, Melchior, and Balthasar, pray for us.

Saint Margaret of Scotland, pray for us.

Appendix

Reprising Dr. Francis Boyle’s Observations Made in 2020

HM: Now let’s get to what’s been on the news recently. This coronavirus in Wuhan. There have been some reports recently, there’s a really interesting website called Great Game India that has been reporting on this. They’ve been talking about China, which they say has been complying with biological weapons convention in recent years. But then there are some people in the US and experts that have been saying that in reality, China isn’t complying with the weapons convention. And I think neither, perhaps the US as well. I’m wondering if China is developing its own Biosafety Level 4 [BSL-4] lab in Wuhan and elsewhere, as you know, as a type of deterrence. Is it a type of a biological arms race that we have going on?

You told me in an email that you suspect China was developing the coronavirus as a dual use of biowarfare weapons agent. Also, what do you make of reports that Chinese scientists have been stealing research and viruses, including the coronavirus, from a Canadian bio lab this past December?3 And as well, Chinese nationals have been charged with smuggling vials of biological research to China from the US — with the aid of Charles Lieber who was the chair of Harvard’s chemistry department.4 And he also happens to be, in 2011, a strategic scientist at Wuhan University. So, can you tell us what’s going on with this recent outbreak in Wuhan?

FB: Well, that’s a lot of questions. I guess we can take them one at a time. But if you just do a very simple Google search on “Does China have a BSL-4 laboratory?”, Wuhan comes up right away. It’s at the top of the list. At the moment this type of thing happened I began to do that. So a BSL-4 is the most serious type. And basically, BSL-4 labs, we have many of them here in the United States, are used to develop offensive biological warfare weapons with DNA genetic engineering.

So it does seem to me that the Wuhan BSL-4 is the source of the coronavirus. my guess is that they were researching SARS, and they weaponised it further by giving it gain of function properties, which means it could be more lethal. And indeed, the latest report now is [that] it’s 15% fatality rate, which is more than SARS at 83% infection rate. So, typical gain of function. It travels in the air, so it could reach out maybe six feet or more from someone emitting a sneeze or a cough. Likewise, this is a specially designated WHO research lab. So the WHO is in on it and they knew full well what was going on there.

Yes, it’s also been reported that Chinese scientists stole coronavirus materials from the Canadian lab at Winnipeg. Winnipeg is Canada’s foremost centre for research, developing, testing, biological warfare weapons. It’s along the lines of Fort Detrick here in the United States of America. I have three degrees from Harvard. It would not surprise me if something was being stolen out of Harvard to turn over to China. I read that report. I don’t know what was in those vials one way or the other.

But the bottom line is — and I drafted the US domestic implementing legislation for the Biological Weapons Convention that was approved unanimously by both Houses of the United States Congress, signed into law by President Bush Sr. — that it appears the coronavirus that we’re dealing with here is an offensive biological warfare weapon that leaked out of that Wuhan BSL-4. I’m not saying it was done deliberately. But there have been previous reports of problems with that lab and things leaking out of it. And I’m afraid, that is what we are dealing with today.

HM: We’ll be talking about the Wuhan and the coronavirus and China, but can you give us kind of like a bigger context. I know you’ve previously in interviews said that since 9/11, you think that the US has spent $100 billion on biological warfare research. We know the Soviet Union, if I’m not mistaken, developed anthrax as a bioweapon. And you’ve also mentioned that UK, France, Israel and China are all involved in biological warfare weapons research. And something interesting, I believe one or two years ago a Bulgarian journalist and the Russian government shared their concern of the discovery of a US bioweapons lab in the country of Georgia. You’ve commented how in Africa, [the]US has set up bioweapons labs to work on Ebola, which I think is illegal under international law. But they were allowed somehow to put those in Africa. Can you give us like a bigger picture? What’s going on with these different countries and what’s the purpose of this research?

FB: All these BSL-4 labs — by United States, Europe, Russia, China, Israel — are all there to research, develop, test biological warfare agents. There’s really no legitimate scientific reason to have BSL-4 labs. That figure I gave, $100 billion, that was about 2015 I believe. I had crunched the numbers and came up with that figure [for] the United States since 9/11. To give you an idea: that’s as much in constant dollars as the US spent to develop the Manhattan Project and the atom bomb. So it’s clearly all weapons related. We have well over 13,000 alleged life science scientists involved in research development testing biological weapons here in the United States. Actually this goes back, it even precedes 9/11, 2001. I have another book, The Future of International Law and American Foreign Policy, tracing that all the way back to the Reagan administration under the influence of the neocons. And they got very heavily involved in research development testing of biological weapons with DNA genetic engineering. It was because of that I issued my plea in 1985 in a Congressional briefing sponsored by the Council for Responsible Genetics — I’m a lawyer for them; they’re headquartered in Cambridge, Massachusetts. All the MIT [Massachusetts Institute of Technology], Harvard people are involved in that, the principal ones, and then they asked me to draft the implementing legislation.

The implementing legislation that I drafted was originally designed to stop this type of work. Death science work, I call it, by the United States government. After 9/11, 2001, it just completely accelerated. My current figure [is] that last figure, a 100 billion [dollars]. I haven’t had a chance to re-crunch the numbers because I just started classes. But you have to add in about another 5 billion per year. Basically, this is an offensive biological weapons race by the United States government, and with its assistance in Canada and Britain. And so other States of the world have responded accordingly, including Russia and China. They were going to set up a whole series of BSL-4 facilities as well. And you know Wuhan was the first. It backfired on them.

HM: So would you boil down what happened [in] Wuhan to ineptitude or incompetence on the Chinese part?

FB: Well, it’s criminality. It does appear they stole something there from Winnipeg. This activity that they engaged in clearly violates the Biological Weapons Convention. Research development of biological weapons these days is an international crime. I mean the use of it would be. That was criminal. I’m not saying they deliberately inflicted this on their own people, but it leaked out of there. And all these BSL-4 facilities leak. Everyone knows that who studies this. So, this was a catastrophe waiting to happen. Unfortunately, it happened. The Chinese government under Xi and his comrades there have been covering this up from the get-go. The first reported case was December 1, so they’ve been sitting on this until they couldn’t anymore. And everything they’re telling you is a lie. It’s propaganda. The WHO still refuses to declare a global health emergency. It said Tedros [Adhanom], Director-General of the WHO] was over there shaking hands with Xi and smiling and yucking it up. The WHO was in on it. They’ve approved many of these BSL-4 labs, they know exactly what’s going on. And that is a WHO research approved laboratory. So they know what’s going on too. You can’t really believe anything the WHO is telling you about this either, they’re up to their eyeballs in it, in my opinion.

HM: I’d probably agree with you that this outbreak in Wuhan was an accidental leak from the laboratory. But just your thoughts: it’s happening at quite an opportune time because we’re smack in the middle of a US-China new Cold War, which is currently characterised by economic warfare such as the trade war among other forms of hybrid and technological warfare. And it seems the Wuhan outbreak will likely hit the Chinese economy hard. The Chinese are flat out dismissing any idea that the US is involved. Like I said, it’s probably they made the mistakes in the Wuhan lab. But what are your thoughts. Seemingly, this would benefit the US.

FB: When the outbreak occurred, of course I considered that alternative too. When you have an outbreak you’re never quite sure who or what is behind it. It certainly isn’t bats, that’s ridiculous. They made the same argument on Ebola in West Africa. I demolished that online, you can check it out. So I kept competing theories about this. But right now, when you originally contacted me, I said I wasn’t prepared to comment because I was weighing the evidence. I’m a law professor and a lawyer, I try to do the best I can to weigh the evidence. But right now, that Wuhan BSL-4 in my opinion is the most likely source. Apply Occam’s razor, the simplest explanation. I’m not ruling out some type of sabotage. But right now, I believe that is the source here. HM: You mentioned WHO. I’d like to just get your thoughts on the WHO and the Big Pharma [pharmaceutical companies]. There’s also some analysts who are downplaying this news media hype of the coronavirus. You’ve just said that it seems to be lethal, but if we go back a decade to the 2009 swine flu, which I believe didn’t have too many casualties, but I think profited greatly the pharmaceutical companies. And if I recall, back in 2009, many countries purchased great stocks of the vaccines and they ended up not using anywhere from 50 to 80% of the vaccines that they purchased. You’ve previously stated in an interview that the World Health Organisation is a front for Big Pharma, if I’m not mistaken. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. also agrees and he says, you know, 50% of WHO funding comes from pharmaceutical companies, and that the CDC itself is also severely compromised. What are your thoughts on the WHO, the CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention]?

FB: You can’t trust anything the WHO says because they’re all bought and paid for by Big Pharma. And they work in cahoots with the CDC, which is the United States government, they work in cahoots with Fort Detrick, so you can’t trust any of it. However, the swine flu — and yes, I agree pharma made a lot of money — but that swine flu which I looked at it, it did seem to me to be a genetically modified biological warfare weapon. It was a chimera of three different types of genetic strains that someone put together in a cocktail. Fortunately, it was not as lethal as all of us fear. So fine. But as I said, this figure I just gave to you was Saturday from Lancet, which is a medical publication, saying it’s a 15% fatality rate and an 83% infection rate. So it’s quite serious, I think, far more serious than swine flu.

As for Big Pharma, sure they’re all trying to profit off this today as we speak. There was a big article yesterday in the Wall Street Journal, all Big Pharma trying to peddle whatever they can over there in China even if it’s worthless and won’t help. We do know you know if you read the mainstream news media they say that there isn’t a vaccine. Well, there is. It’s by the Pirbright Institute in Britain that’s tied into their biological warfare program over there. They were behind the hoof-and-mouth [aka foot-and-mouth] disease outbreak over there that wiped out their cattle herd and it leaked out of there. So it’s clear they’re working on a hoof and mouth biological warfare weapon. But the vaccine is there. I have the patent for it here — I haven’t had a chance to read the patent, it’s about 25 pages long and my classes [have] just resume[d]. So eventually, I'll get some free time and I’ll read the patent.

You can’t patent a vaccine with the United States patent office unless the science is there. So there is a vaccine. Everyone’s lying about that, no one’s pointing this out. There’s a vaccine but instead Big Pharma wants to make money and the researchers say, well, it’ll take three months and we’re racing forward, you know. Everyone’s gonna make a buck off of this, that’s for sure. But there is a vaccine, I have the patent here. It’s been patented by the United States government. So, obviously, I don’t know exactly how workable it is, but it’s a vaccine. I don’t know why it isn’t out there now? Why isn’t someone saying there is a vaccine? Perhaps political leaders have already been vaccinated for all I know. I really don’t know. But there is a vaccine. Pirbright is well known there in Britain, and it’s tied into Fort Detrick, and CDC is tied into Fort Detrick too. So they all know there’s a patented vaccine.

HM: Just to get your comment on something related to this... I think, I’m not sure, if it’s that same Institute that you just mentioned that has the patent. I read somewhere that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation maybe funds or has some connection to that Institute that has the patent.

FB: I think they do. Yeah. The Bill & Melinda Gates [Foundation], they fund this type of DNA genetically-engineered biological warfare work. That’s correct. So you can’t trust anything they’re telling you, that somehow they’re out there trying to make the world a better place. I mean, we have Bill Gates publicly admitting that the world be a better place if there were a lot less people. So, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, they are wolves in sheep’s clothing, and they are funding this type of stuff. Sure. [Now allied with the Vatican, arch population controller Gates has been touted as a potential funding partner of the Pope's sulphurous Global Education Pact, due to kick off in Rome this May, with a view to creating a "new humanism."]

HM: And just your comment: there was also the report that — I guess it was a consortium of companies which included the Gates Foundation — that just two or three months ago in October of 2019 they held a pandemic exercise simulating an outbreak. I mean, what are the chances specifically of a coronavirus. It was called Event 201. People can find this online online and they gave a list of seven recommendations for governments and international organisations to take. I also find that kind of interesting, how they had this simulation.

FB: That’s correct. It raises that question: the origins of what happened here. But right now, I’m just looking at the evidence I have, and applying Occam’s razor. And we know that Wuhan BSL-4 was researching, developing, testing, SARS as a biological warfare agent. So it could have been they gave it this DNA genetic engineering enhanced properties, gain of function, which we do here in the West, in the United States all the time. We have all sorts of research that is clearly bio-warfare research that has been approved by the National Institutes of Health. It’s a joke. They know full well they are approving all kinds of biological warfare research. And it gets funded by the United States government.

HM: And you’ve also mentioned in an email to me that what happened in the Biosafety Lab level 4 in Wuhan calls into question the safety of all of these level 3 and 4 four labs around the world.

FB: They’re completely unsafe. BSL-3 and BSL-4 labs are only designed for research, development, testing of offensive biological warfare agents. In my opinion they serve no legitimate purpose at all. They should all be shut down. Every one of them. Simply, they’re too dangerous. If you want, there’s an excellent documentary called Anthrax Wars, by Nadler and Coen, and I’m in there repeatedly, and at the end I say, with respect to these labs, 3 and 4, this is a catastrophe waiting to happen.

HM: We’ll be talking about the Wuhan and the coronavirus and China, but can you give us kind of like a bigger context. I know you’ve previously in interviews said that since 9/11, you think that the US has spent $100 billion on biological warfare research. We know the Soviet Union, if I’m not mistaken, developed anthrax as a bioweapon. And you’ve also mentioned that UK, France, Israel and China are all involved in biological warfare weapons research. And something interesting, I believe one or two years ago a Bulgarian journalist and the Russian government shared their concern of the discovery of a US bioweapons lab in the country of Georgia. You’ve commented how in Africa, [the]US has set up bioweapons labs to work on Ebola, which I think is illegal under international law. But they were allowed somehow to put those in Africa. Can you give us like a bigger picture? What’s going on with these different countries and what’s the purpose of this research?

FB: All these BSL-4 labs — by United States, Europe, Russia, China, Israel — are all there to research, develop, test biological warfare agents. There’s really no legitimate scientific reason to have BSL-4 labs. That figure I gave, $100 billion, that was about 2015 I believe. I had crunched the numbers and came up with that figure [for] the United States since 9/11. To give you an idea: that’s as much in constant dollars as the US spent to develop the Manhattan Project and the atom bomb. So it’s clearly all weapons related. We have well over 13,000 alleged life science scientists involved in research development testing biological weapons here in the United States. Actually this goes back, it even precedes 9/11, 2001. I have another book, The Future of International Law and American Foreign Policy, tracing that all the way back to the Reagan administration under the influence of the neocons. And they got very heavily involved in research development testing of biological weapons with DNA genetic engineering. It was because of that I issued my plea in 1985 in a Congressional briefing sponsored by the Council for Responsible Genetics — I’m a lawyer for them; they’re headquartered in Cambridge, Massachusetts. All the MIT [Massachusetts Institute of Technology], Harvard people are involved in that, the principal ones, and then they asked me to draft the implementing legislation. The implementing legislation that I drafted was originally designed to stop this type of work. Death science work, I call it, by the United States government. After 9/11, 2001, it just completely accelerated. My current figure [is] that last figure, a 100 billion [dollars]. I haven’t had a chance to re-crunch the numbers because I just started classes. But you have to add in about another 5 billion per year. Basically, this is an offensive biological weapons race by the United States government, and with its assistance in Canada and Britain. And so other States of the world have responded accordingly, including Russia and China. They were going to set up a whole series of BSL-4 facilities as well. And you know Wuhan was the first. It backfired on them.

Well, I’m afraid the catastrophe is now happened. So, there it is.

HM: I was just watching that documentary before we connected and I recommend the listeners go check that out. Do you see, in the future, any countries, if we come to a conflict between US, EU, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Iran, China, Russia, I mean you name it, do you see any of these countries actually utilising these biological weapons? I mean, it’s illegal under international law but we know like in the past that international law isn’t followed. Do you think that there’s a real danger of this escalating?

FB: For sure. That’s the only reason they develop these biological weapons, is, eventually, to be used, sure. I mean, it’s like the Manhattan project. We put all that money into developing an atom bomb, and even though it was not needed to end World War II, they still nuked Hiroshima and Nagasaki. So, yes, I think that’s correct. And also these can be used covertly. Anytime you see an unexplained, sudden outbreak of a disease like this anywhere in the world, both for human beings and/or animals, I always suspect the bio-warfare agent is at work. And I monitor the situation, like I did at Wuhan, until I can reach a conclusion. So, yes, they can be used.

As for the United States government, today they are fully prepared, armed, equipped, supplied to wage biological warfare with anthrax. These other more exotic things I don’t know. But they have the weapons, they're stockpiled. We have to understand ... if you read Seymour Myron Hersh’s book, published about 1968, he won the Pulitzer prize for My Lai, he had the whole offensive US biological warfare industry in there — back before it was illegal and criminal. Basically, after 9/11 2001, that entire industry — offensive biological warfare industry — has been reconstituted here in the United States, with all these BSL-4 BSL-3 labs, well over 13,000, alleged scientists, sort of like Dr. Mengele, working on these things. And so other countries have responded in kind, like Russia, like China. France is involved. Britain’s involved. Sure.

HM: You mentioned covert use. In the last few years there was the Russian double-agent spy, Sergei Skripal, who had been allegedly poisoned with Novichok out in Britain. And I thought it was funny [that] it just so happened where he was allegedly poisoned, he was right in Porton Down, the British bio weapons lab [near Salisbury], I guess the world’s first bio weapons lab created in 1916. I don’t know if you have thoughts on that whole incident.

FB: Yeah, well, it was right down the street from Porton Down, so apply Occam’s razor, who do you think might’ve been behind this? And, it was not a nerve agent, a nerve agent would have killed him immediately, this Novichok. It was something else, like VX or something like that. I would just say that I don’t think that [proximity to Porton Down] was a coincidence. But, you know, there you go. Obviously there’s a lot of speculation on that.

HM: Something else that’s kind of interesting. You’ve written in Biowarfare and Terrorism, your book, and there’s also Graeme MacQueen, I think your colleague, who wrote The 2001 Anthrax Deception : The Case for a Domestic Conspiracy...

FB: Right. I agree with everything he said in there. That’s correct.

HM: ... and I’m wondering, if this new war for biotechnological dominance, whatever you want to call it, if it can also be used kind of as a pretext for the centralisation of political power and the initiation of wars, like I guess it did in the 2003 Iraq war. Is this another danger that we get these events, like now this coronavirus, and then governments will call for centralisation of greater power, and taking away some of our civil liberties?

FB: Sure. If you look at the October, 2001 anthrax attacks here in the United States, that was clearly by elements of the United States government that was behind that. That was super weapons-grade anthrax, with a trillion spores per gram, and it floated in the air. Solely a very sophisticated biological weapons lab, like Fort Detrick, could produce that. And they used that anthrax attack, including on Congress, to ram through the USA Patriot act, which basically turned the United States into a police state, which is what we have now. So, you have to understand, the Pentagon, Fort Detrick, maybe Dugway Proving Ground [bio and chem weapons testing area in Utah], still has a stockpile of that super weapons-grade anthrax that we saw in October of 2001, that they can use the next time they want to do something like that, to further develop the American police state.

HM: Is there anything else you feel important to mention regarding this Wuhan Coronavirus outbreak or biological warfare, or any other thoughts you’d like to leave us with?

FB: Well, you just can’t believe anything the Chinese government, the WHO, the CDC are telling you. They’re all lying because they know what was going on there. And so, you’re going to have to figure it out as fast as you can. But in my opinion, as of this time, and I’m fully prepared to consider further evidence on this, it does seem to me that this was a DNA, genetically-engineered biological warfare agent leaking out of Wuhan, that has gain of function properties, which can make it more lethal. I think they're probably doing something with SARS to make it a lot more lethal and more infectious. And so for that reason, you have to take extreme precautions. And they’ve now finally admitted, well yeah, anyone within six feet can be infected, whereas with SARS it was about two feet. Well, that’s gain of function right there. And that should be a tip off.

So, I guess you’re gonna have to protect yourself. Laurie Garrett had a pretty good essay in Foreign Policy yesterday, and she was over there covering SARS, and she has very good advice in there, except that she took the SARS figure out two to three feet and said well, you gotta stay to two to three. I think you’ve got to stay at least six feet away, because this is gain of function. It can flow through the air and infect you. It can get you in the eyes. Any orifice, the mouth, maybe the ears. We’re not sure, at this point.

HM: I’m here on the border of China, in Kazakhstan, and I was just reading yesterday... they’re no longer allowing Chinese citizens into Kazakhstan without a medical, like a paper medical check, to get their visas to enter Kazakhstan.

FB: Those medical checks are worthless. This is just public relations by all the governments involved. Because there is a fourteen day incubation period where people can still be infected. So someone could walk right through a medical inspection and pass it, get into your country, and then they come down with the coronavirus. So that’s all public relations in my opinion by governments, and they know it. They’re just sending people out there, with temperatures and things like that. It’s not like SARS. This is more dangerous than SARS. As I said, I think that Wuhan lab, we know they had SARS in there that they were dealing with, and I think they enhanced it, and, I’m afraid, that’s what we’re dealing with. But you know I’m keeping an open mind as to what other sources it might have. And I wasn’t prepared to say anything until [I found] that Wuhan lab is right there and it’s dealing with coronavirus. So, again, apply Occam’s razor. It seems to me that’s the simplest explanation here.

HM: One of my final questions would be, in the months ahead, apart of what you say, staying six feet away from people, I’ve read taking high doses of vitamin C and other things like this can help you. But, if they come out as the situation develops, if it gets worse, and they come out with a coronavirus vaccine, should people take it or not? What are your thoughts?

FB: Well, what I would say is this. Right now, if you look at the article in the Wall Street Journal, Big Pharma is trying to sell all sorts of — they’re taking all their drugs off the shelf, and say, well, let’s see if it works. Which is preposterous. Okay. The scientists are saying, well, we can get you a vaccine, maybe two to three months, but they’re not testing. So, what we do know, however, is that Pirbright vaccine has been patented. So all I can assume is that that might work. But I don’t think I’d be taking any of these other vaccines. No, you have no idea what’s in there. You’ll be the guinea pig, for Big Pharma. And, you know, everyone figures they’re gonna make a lot of money here. So I’ll keep my eye open on this, and how it develops, but I wouldn’t trust anything they’re trying to sell right now. They’re just pulling these things off the shelf.

If they do come up with something in two to three months, even that’s not going to be tested, in accordance with normal scientific protocols. So it’s going to be a crap shoot. If it’s going to help you, indeed it might not help you because they’ll be using for these vaccines, these DNA genetic-engineered vaccines, they’ll be using live coronavirus, probably, and sticking it in there and giving you, some live coronavirus, on the theory you’ll develop an immunity. That’s the way a lot of these vaccines work out. That’s what happened with the Ebola vaccine that created the Ebola pandemic there in West Africa. They were testing out a vaccine on poor black Africans, as usual, and this vaccine had live Ebola in it, so it gave them live Ebola. So again, I’d be very careful, even if they do come up with these vaccines two to three months from now. Very careful. Why would you want to inject the live coronavirus in you?

HM: All right. I don’t believe you have a strong online presence. How can people best follow your work? I suppose to search for interviews as well as get your books.

FB: Well, basically I’m blackballed and blacklisted off all the mainstream news media here, on purpose. As far as I can figure out, the US government gave an order that I should not be interviewed by anyone, so I’m not. I guess you could just put my name in there under Google, a Google alert, and some interviews might come up.

But what happened was, right after the anthrax attacks of 9/11, 2001, I was giving a lecture out at Harvard, my Alma Mater. I was running a panel on biological warfare for the Council for Responsible Genetics, I'm their lawyer. It was at Harvard Divinity School, and as I was going in there was a Fox camera crew there from Boston, and I said it looks to me like this has come out of the US government's lab, and we know they do research and testing on anthrax. Then I said the same thing there at Harvard. Then I gave an interview to a radio station in Washington DC. Then I gave an interview on that to the BBC. So the whole world saw it. And at that point I was completely cut off. And I’ve been cut off ever since.

So, you're probably not going to hear too many interviews from me here. As for my book, Biowarfare and Terrorism, you can just get it at amazon.com. That picks up the story pretty much from 9/11, 2001, until it went to press. And then there are interviews I’ve given to an investigative reporter, Sherwood Ross. And a big one I just sent you, and you might want to put that on your web page. That was pretty comprehensive.

HM: I read that as well. I’ll include the link in the description of this interview, so people can go check that out. You’re not the only academic I know, I've heard of others that similar things have happened [to]. And that’s just, I guess, the price you, we, pay for telling the truth. Again, for listeners, if people want to have a broader context and deeper understanding of what’s happening today, especially with biological warfare, as well as US foreign policy and international affairs, I urge you to get Dr. Francis Boyle’s books and listen to his interviews, as well as his colleague's book, Graeme MacQueen, The 2001 Anthrax Deception, The Case For Domestic Conspiracy. Thank you for being with us, Dr. Boyle.

FB: Well, thank you. And again, please understand these are my current opinions. I could change my opinion here, based on more evidence. So I’m just looking at the evidence out there as I see it. And you have to understand, there is so much disinformation, lies and propaganda, that it’s kind of very difficult to distinguish truth from fact. I’m doing the best job I can here.

[Christian Order] Editor's Comment China's Genocidal Biowarfare Plan After reading Dr Boyle's expert, plain-speaking assessment, those still reliant, whether solely or mostly, on corporate media for their news may finally reconsider their self-harming habit and seek out alternative sources. He lays bare the disinformation put about (once again) on the origins and true nature of a virus: in this case not the random product of nature and "bats" as depicted, but of sinister experiments in a lab. His considered view, aggressively attacked by the media and big tech giants and labelled "misinformaton" and "fake news" by the WHO, was subsequently vindicated. A study by scientists at the prestigious South China University of Technology in Guangzhou confirmed that "the killer coronavirus probably originated from a laboratory in Wuhan." [Daily Mail, 16/2/20]

There is every reason to suspect the darkest reasons for shutting down truth-tellers. In this regard, readers who recall the murder of English bio-warfare expert Dr David Kelly in 2003, and the flagrant Establishment cover-up, will appreciate the courage of Dr Boyle in speaking out. Indeed, he mentions being deemed persona non grata ever since he depicted the anthrax-letters attacks just after 9/11 as the Deep State (CIA/Fort Derek biodefence centre) conspiracy it turned out to be. Later, in 2008, following the entirely predictable and convenient pre-indictment "suicide" of the (equally convenient) alleged sole perpetrator of those anthrax letters (microbiologist Bruce Ivins of Ft Derek), Dr Boyle said: “Ivins is only the latest dead microbiologist.” He had previously stated:

“You also have to tie into this the large numbers of dead microbiologists that have appeared since around the summer before these events, when the New York Times revealed the existence of the covert anthrax weapons programmes run by the CIA, and that too is in the public record.”

Fast forward to 2020. On cue, a renowned infectious disease specialist, Canadian Frank Plummer, who was the key to the entire investigation on the origins of the coronavirus bio-weapon, collapsed and died, suddenly and conveniently on 4 February, during an annual meeting at the University of Nairobi, Kenya, where he was a keynote speaker. Omitted from mainstream reports were some salient facts:

1. Plummer was working on a coronavirus (HIV) vaccine at his National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg, thanks to a SARS coronavirus sample he had received from the Saudis;

2. The Winnipeg lab had been targeted by Chinese bio-warfare agents. The chief Chinese scientist, Dr. Qiu, was allegedly making trips between Winnipeg and Wuhan. By July 2019 she and her Chinese compatriots had been kicked out of the facility, but not before they reportedly stole the SARS Coronavirus from the lab and smuggled it to none other than China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology — where, in the estimation of Dr Boyle and others, it is believed to have been weaponised and leaked.

Thankfully, independent outlets like Infowars, Natural News, Daily Caller, Breitbart, and in this case Geopolitics & Empire, along with many other sources, allow us to discern the deeper truths behind daily headlines long before the controlled corporate press is compelled to abandon its spurious narratives. In other words, despite both the unavoidable abundance of fake news to be found among millions of websites, and the official disinformation spewed forth by intelligence agencies (East and West) to distract, divide, confuse and demoralise us, the demonisation of alternative media as baseless "conspiracy" fare is itself fake news.

As truth-seekers know through years of weighing up reliability, the reporting, analysis and conclusions of countless credible sites and 'citizen journalist' bloggers are invariably based on brave investigative reporting (like the devastating undercover exposé of Planned Parenthood by David Daleiden); little publicised articles and reports already in the public domain (oftentimes irrefutable declassified documents); and the input of acknowledged experts and courageous whistleblowers sidelined by the press. Meanwhile, massive cyber-attacks were duly launched against Natural News, Zero Hedge, Great Game India and other sites reporting on the coronavirus. Natural News provided this sobering summation:

“Dr. Boyle’s position is in stark contrast to the mainstream media’s narrative of the virus being originated from the seafood market, which is increasingly being questioned by many experts,” reports GreatGameIndia.com [3/2/20], an independent news website that has also been subjected to aggressive cyber-attacks after it began publishing information about the coronavirus pandemic. (Natural News was also subjected to an extremely well-funded cyber takedown attack that disrupted our publishing operations for 2-3 days.) As Great Game India now reports:

[T]he mainstream media’s narrative still maintains that the origin of the 2019 Coronavirus is the Wuhan Seafood Market. After GreatGameIndia published the story on Coronavirus Bioweapon – not only were our database tinkered with and our reports blocked by Facebook on the flimsy reason that they could not find GreatGameIndia Facebook page, but the report itself was viciously attacked by Foreign Policy magazine, PolitiFact (known widely as Facebook’s propaganda arm) and BuzzFeedNews. (Facebook's laughable claim is no surprise given Mark Zuckerberg’s history of forgetting crucial information when grilled by authorities worldwide. So, we would just like to remind everyone "How Facebook’s Secret Unit created India’s Troll Armies for Digital Propaganda to Influence Elections."5 )

It is not GreatGameIndia alone which is being viciously attacked. Zero Hedge, a popular alternate media blog was suspended by Twitter for publishing a story related to a study by Indian scientists finding 2019 Wuhan Coronavirus to be not naturally evolved, raising the possibility of it being created in a lab. Shockingly, the study itself came under intense online criticism by Social Media experts resulting in the scientists withdrawing the paper. The coronavirus biological weapon development program was part of China’s long-admitted effort to weaponise viruses and wipe out the USA by deploying them on U.S. soil. “In a secret speech given to high-level Communist Party cadres nearly two decades ago, Chinese Defense Minister Gen. Chi Haotian explained a long-range plan for ensuring a Chinese national renaissance,” reports Great Game India: “We are not as foolish as to want to perish together with America by using nuclear weapons,” said the general. “Only by using non-destructive weapons that can kill many people will we be able to reserve America for ourselves.” The answer is found in biological weapons. “Of course,” he added, “we have not been idle, in the past years we have seized the opportunity to master weapons of this kind.” “In the long run,” said Gen. Chi, “the relationship of China and the United States is one of a life-and-death struggle.” This tragic situation must be accepted. According to Gen. Chi, “We must not forget that the history of our civilisation repeatedly has taught us that one mountain does not allow two tigers to live together.” According to Gen. Chi, China’s overpopulation problem and environmental degradation will eventually result in social collapse and civil war. General Chi estimated that “more than 800 million” Chinese would die in such a collapse. Therefore, the Chinese Communist Party has no policy alternative. Either the United States is “cleaned up” by biological attacks, or China suffers national catastrophe.6 In other words, China has been building a biological weapon to destroy the United States, and that weapon got loose in their own back yard. Now, it looks like China may have just nuked itself with that very same bioweapon, and the fate of China’s population, industrial output and political leadership looks very much in doubt. Perhaps it’s fitting that the coronavirus may be the vector by which China destroys itself before its treacherous philosophy of communism, tyranny and mass death infects the entire world. (The Coronavirus Cover-up, published in Christian Order, March 2020, issue. For ordering information, please see www.christianorder.com/subscribe.html">http://www.christianorder.com/subscribe.html">Christian Order)

A Few Pertinent Observations About the Boyle Interview (As found in Sin: More Deadly Than the Coronavirus, part two, revised.)

There are several important points that I want to highlight for the readers of Christ or Chaos.

First, the information provided by Dr. Francis Boyle is very important for all those who read this article to consider and digest.

Second, Catholics have got to understand and accept the fact that Dr. Francis Boyle is entirely correct when he states that one must believe nothing—as in absolutely nothing—that is said by officials of the United States Centers for Disease Control and the World Health Organization about how to “stop” the China Virus. It is thus nothing less than tragic that many fully traditional Catholic clergy believe anything these purveyors of evil say as their agenda is ideological and thus has nothing to do with legitimate public health. Once again, the China Virus crisis is all about social control, not public health. Does the fact that Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has cover-up cholera cases in his native Ethiopia and that he is a lifelong member of a terrorist organization mean anything? See https://dailycaller.com/2020/03/23/world-health-organization-tedros-adha...">World Health Organization President Tedro Adhaanom Ghebreyeus Covered Up Cholera Outbreaks in His Native Ethiopia.